Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Speed Control and Performance Investigation of a Vector Controlled Electric Vehicle Considering Driving Cycles
Next Article in Special Issue
Is Initial Performance in a Course Informative? Machine Learning Algorithms as Aids for the Early Detection of At-Risk Students
Previous Article in Journal
A Compact and Wideband Dashboard Antenna for Vehicular LTE/5G Wireless Communications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Will–Skill–Tool Components as Key Factors for Digital Media Implementation in Education: Austrian Teachers’ Experiences with Digital Forms of Instruction during the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Influencing Students’ Continuous Intentions for Using Micro-Lectures in the Post-COVID-19 Period: A Modification of the UTAUT-2 Approach

by
Tommy Tanu Wijaya
1 and
Robert Weinhandl
2,*
1
School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
Linz School of Education, STEM Education, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 4040 Linz, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2022, 11(13), 1924; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131924
Submission received: 8 May 2022 / Revised: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 26 May 2022 / Published: 21 June 2022

Abstract

:
Micro-lectures, i.e., short learning videos on a specific aspect of a topic, have become one of the most effective technology-based learning media approaches and were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in the post-pandemic era starting from early 2022, as K-12 students have been allowed to resume going to school, it is necessary to evaluate students’ intentions to continuously use micro-lectures for learning mathematics. Therefore, this study aims to explore attitudes and continuous intentions of students towards the utilization of micro-lectures. To investigate students’ intentions of using micro-lectures, we utilized the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT-2). Data were collected from 321 junior high school students (14–17 years old) in Bandung, Indonesia, who used online classes and micro-lectures to learn mathematics during the pandemic. A structural equation model was also used to analyze the independent (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating condition, hedonic motivation, and habit) and dependent (attitude and continuous intention) variables. Furthermore, online questionnaires were used to obtain data on students’ attitudes and continuous intention to utilize micro-lectures in the post-COVID-19 era. The results suggested that effort expectancy (EE) and hedonic motivation (HM) had a significant effect on attitudes, whose correlation with habit also influenced the continuous intention during this post-pandemic period. Despite these results, the habit variable was found to be the factor most influencing continuous intention. These results provide information to teachers, schools, and the government to continuously increase the use of micro-lectures based on improving student learning performances in the post-pandemic era.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has reportedly caused significant changes in many sectors, including education [1], as people are advised to develop and rely on technologies towards carrying out activities while avoiding direct contact [2]. This has led to the rapidly increasing demand for the use of appropriate technologies [3]. Due to the increasing number of positive Indonesian COVID-19 patients in March 2020 [4,5], the government declared a lockdown where students were temporarily unable to attend school towards carrying out face-to-face teaching and learning activities, leading to the commencement of online education [6,7]. To ensure the effectiveness of these online activities, various learning approaches were applied to all educational levels [8,9,10]. Many Indonesian institutions utilized video conferencing tools such as Zoom and Google Meet as learning media [11,12], due to their having a similar traditional style to schools where the teacher explains and the students listen. Based on these conditions, the pandemic situation is a challenge for institutions and teachers in this country, where circumstances forced the transformation of teaching and learning in classrooms to online learning. During the lockdown period, micro-lectures were observed as one of the most widely used learning media to help students understand mathematical materials [13,14]. In 2020, the pandemic condition became an opportunity for this medium to develop and support online learning [10,15,16]. Additionally, the initial aim of the learning medium was to focus on important understandable points towards improving students’ comprehensive ability when learning new concepts and knowledge [17].
Despite these advantages of online learning, some previous studies have argued that the pandemic shifted from a face-to-face teaching method to online learning to deliver new knowledge to students [18,19]. According to Kramarski [20], the use of the formative assessment concept was very important to continue teaching and learning activities through online educational media. In online education, the model for delivering materials is divided into two categories, namely synchronous and asynchronous [21]. The combination of several digital platforms based on increasing communication and interaction in teaching and learning activities is observed in the synchronous approach [22], while the asynchronous method uses technology-based media to enrich educational processes, as well as help students, by repeating the subject matter taught when taking virtual lessons [23]. This confirms that one of the asynchronous-based learning media is the utilization of micro-lectures. Before the pandemic, the development of this learning medium was not widely used as a supplement to improve students’ understanding of new theories [24,25]. However, teachers were increasingly using micro-lectures in learning activities after the emergence of COVID-19, although video conferencing and other media had weaknesses within the country, such as a lack of virtual facilities or expensive internet prices [26,27,28]. This proves that micro-lectures are likely to essentially increase the usefulness of their effects and uses due to the pandemic situation, which forced the transformation of the learning approaches [29].
Previous studies are observed to be very limited in the analysis of students’ intention towards micro-lectures. There is only one study from K. Wang et al. [25] based on the use of micro-lectures learning media before the pandemic (2016–2017), through the technology acceptance model (TAM). However, the other reports focused more on experimental pretest–posttest analyses to evaluate the effect of micro-lectures on student outcomes [30,31,32]. This shows that no experiment has been carried out on the factors influencing students to continuously utilize micro-lectures after the COVID-19-related school shutdowns. By June 2022, Indonesia is expected to return to the “new normal” era, where all business and trade sectors are to be carried out as previously performed [2,33]. In the education sector, students are also expected to start attending school for face-to-face learning for the new academic year (2021–2022). Therefore, this study aims to determine the continuous intention of students towards using micro-lectures as a supplement for mathematics learning in the post-pandemic period. This is expected to provide several contributions towards appropriately understanding the factors influencing students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures when returning to the traditional direct learning method. The results are also expected to help in appropriately understanding the use and benefits of the learning media, especially in mathematics, to improve academic performance in the post-pandemic period. In addition, it contributes to the provision of significant suggestions to micro-lecture developers, school principals, and policymakers, to relevantly consider the factors influencing students’ continuous intention during this period.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Micro-Lectures in Mathematics Education

Micro-lectures have been widely used and proven to improve students’ mathematical abilities, as studies have continuously promoted in the educational sector since the early 2000s [24,34], and were also increasingly used during the COVID-19 pandemic [29]. This explains that the learning media aims to actively promote students to learn according to their needs, through the combination with online education [25]. Before and during the pandemic, micro-lectures were often used to review lessons [24,35], defined as a short, less than 10 min, video focusing on new knowledge and concepts [36]. When students do not understand the teacher’s in-class explanation, this learning media helped them in reviewing important points [31,34]. Many platforms were also used before and during the COVID-19 pandemic as the sources of micro-lectures, such as Moodle [37,38], YouTube [39,40], and others. Due to the convenience of this media, teachers created their educational sources according to the learning circumstances and needs. In this decade, micro-lectures are often used in schools to support the flipped learning approach and review lessons capable of meeting the needs of students as individualized education (Zhang and Xu, 2015). Meanwhile, there is no empirical study analyzing students’ continuous intention towards the utilization of micro-lectures after a post-pandemic period.
In such learning environments, a significant change was observed before and after the pandemic. This explained that some studies emphasized specific influential factors and analyzed the effectiveness of these learning tools before and during the pandemic, respectively [29,41,42]. Before this condition, many reports focused on increasing the use of micro-lectures as learning media for students [24,25,43]. Meanwhile, the online learning approach became more advanced, with the educational tools being increasingly used as complementary media after the 2-year existence of the pandemic [8,44]. This indicates the need for subsequent studies on the factors influencing the continuous intention to use micro-lectures during a post-pandemic period when more strong evidence is observed on the effect of the learning media on students’ abilities.

2.2. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

Based on many technological models, UTAUT has been widely used as a comprehensive tool for measuring the acceptance and use of online learning media [45,46,47]. Venkatesh et al. (2012) believe that the original UTAUT model can still be developed to predict better user behavior intention and usage behavior towards new technologies. This led to the development of the UTAUT-2 by Venkatesh et al. [48] from the previous 2003 UTAUT model. The UTAUT model is also a combination of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior (TRA and TPB), as well as the technology acceptance model (TAM) [2,49].
Based on Figure 1, the UTAUT2 model was formed from 7 elements, namely performance and effort expectancies, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, price value, and habit [50]. Compared to the initial version, the proposed UTAUT-2 extension produces a substantial increase to explain the variance (R2) in intention behavior from 56% to 74% and usage behaviors from 40% to 52%, respectively [51]. Moreover, the model is used to explain students’ behavioral intentions and teachers’ attitudes towards online learning media [38,51,52]. Despite these conditions, some studies criticized that UTAUT-2 was still rarely used in various countries and contexts [51]. This led to the selection of the proposed model, which is expected to increase the variance explained in the factors influencing students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures after the pandemic. Figure 2 shows a proposed model illustrating the initial hypothesis to explain the assumed influential factors of the learning media’s continuous intention. This proposed model was derived from UTAUT-2 (Venkatesh et al. [48]) and modified through the addition of attitude, as a variable affecting students’ continuous intention based on previous reports. The hypotheses of this study are as follows.

2.2.1. Performance Expectancy (PE)

Performance expectancy is the level to which a person believes that technology improves efficiency and effectiveness [48,53,54]. It is also the degree to which students believe that using micro-lectures enhances their mathematical abilities and scores in the post-pandemic period. This shows that students need to have a positive attitude and believe that the learning media has mathematical improvement capabilities. In this condition, intentions are mostly predicted based on the confidence level of people in the assistance system or tool used in their daily lives. This shows that performance expectancy is significant when students believe that micro-lectures have the capability to improve their mathematical abilities and learning outcomes in the post-pandemic period. For example, students believed that these tools often helped in understanding mathematical materials when used at the end of the pandemic. In this case, their continuous intention to keep using the micro-lectures after the COVID-19 condition is very possible. Thus, in the present study the following is hypothesized:
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
There is a significant positive effect of PE on students’ attitudes towards micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period.
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
There is a significant positive effect of PE on the continuous intention to use micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period.

2.2.2. Effort Expectancy (EE)

Effort expectancy is the degree to which a person does not have a problem with the use of the technology (costly and slow) [53]. This often occurs when a person has previous experience with the utilized technologies [55]. Furthermore, UTAUT has been widely used to analyze the influential level of EE on a person, as well as students and teachers, towards the acceptance of online learning media in the educational sector [56,57]. Effort expectancy is also confirmed to have a strong influence on the intention to use technology-based media, as some previous reports explained that it was an essential factor affecting the utilization of online learning in the educational sector [58,59,60]. In this present study, EE was effortlessly used to explore students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period. Based on the mathematics teachers, previous reports stated that EE affected the use of the learning media in China [35]. Despite these results, it was still not significant for technology-based learning media according to a few reviews [59], [61]. Thus, in the present study the following is hypothesized:
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
There is a significant positive effect of EE on students’ attitudes towards micro-lectures in the post-COVID-19 period.
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
Effort expectancy has a significant effect on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lecture in the post-pandemic period.

2.2.3. Habit (HB)

Habit is one of the interesting determinants introduced by Venkatesh in the development of UTAUT-2 [48]. In some previous reports, habit was observed as a determinant with a greatly significant effect on a person towards the utilization of online learning media [51,62]. Meanwhile, it was the main factor influencing the use of new technologies according to other reviews [51,52]. This confirms that the intention of people towards the use of habit increases when they utilize new technologies [51]. These observations are reinforced by the study of de Guinea and Markus [63], where intention behavior is transformed into a habit. This explained that when the use of technologies became a person’s habit, the utilization intention was no longer needed. These results were due to the definition of habit as a mechanism for the repetition of unrealized behaviors, indicating its ineffectiveness on a person’s attitude. Thus, in the present study the following is hypothesized:
Hypothesis 5 (H5).
Habit does not have a significant effect on students’ attitude to use micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period.
Hypothesis 6 (H6).
Habit has a significant effect on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period.

2.2.4. Hedonic Motivation (HM)

The pleasure obtained when using a new technology affects the intention to utilize digital media [40,64]. This is because some previous studies confirmed that hedonic motivation (HM) predicted behavioral intention (BI) towards using online learning media [40,65,66]. It is also observed to have influential abilities on teachers and students regarding the utilization of mobile learning technology [62,67]. Furthermore, various reports have reportedly used HM with ATT (attitude toward technology) in UTAUT-2, with a positive effect being observed on attitude towards the use of interactive social media [68]. Another result also indicated that the enjoyment felt by students significantly influenced the use of online media [69], leading to the hypothesis that HM affects the continuous intention to use micro-lectures in a post-pandemic period. The pleasure obtained from using this media to learn mathematics also positively affects students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures even when the pandemic is over. Thus, in the present study the following is hypothesized:
Hypothesis 7 (H7).
Hedonic motivation affects students’ attitudes towards micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period.
Hypothesis 8 (H8).
Hedonic motivation influences students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period.

2.2.5. Social Influence (SI)

Social influence is the degree to which a person believes that the environment leads to the use of technologies in their daily activities [53]. This has a big impact, especially at the beginning of technological utilization [70]. It also affects the intention to use new technologies when an individual obtains societal support for utilization [38,71,72]. Moreover, social influence affects the utilization of online learning media even when unwanted [71,73]. Using UTAUT-2, Venkatesh (2012) found that it was the biggest factor influencing an individual towards the use of technological equipment under mandatory conditions. These effects nevertheless become insignificant when observed under voluntary conditions. Based on various reports, SI was found to have a positive and significant effect on a person’s and students’ intentions to ordinarily and educationally use technology-based media, respectively [53,74,75]. This was in line with other previous studies, where SI affected students towards using video-based learning media [35]. Thus, in the present study the following is hypothesized:
Hypothesis 9 (H9).
Social Influence has a significant effect on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period.

2.2.6. Facilitating Conditions (FC)

The intention to use new technology is influenced by resources and institution support, which are often observed as facilitating conditions [38,69,76]. This indicates that a supportive team and knowledge are very important in innovative technological utilization [37]. According to some previous reports, FC had a significant impact on BI [35], with a direct influence observed on the intention of an individual to use online media [69]. However, others found that FC did not have a significant impact on BI and UB [46,77]. This is then analyzed as a factor influencing the continuous intention of junior high school students in using micro-lectures during the post-pandemic period. Thus, in the present study the following is hypothesized:
Hypothesis 10 (H10).
Facilitating conditions have a significant effect on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures in the post-COVID-19 period.

2.2.7. Price Value (PV)

Price value is widely used to predict teacher intentions to use online learning media [62], with a study confirming a positive relationship between PV and mobile internet utilization [52]. These conditions revealed that the micro-lectures used by students required an internet quota to download and replay learning activities, with price value determining its significance level on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures after the pandemic. In addition, sensible and low-cost mobile internet access influences the intention to use the learning media during this period [69]. Thus, in the present study the following is hypothesized:
Hypothesis 11 (H11).
Price value has a significant effect on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period.

2.2.8. Attitudes towards Micro-Lectures (ATT)

According to a previous review, the attitude towards behavior measured a person’s interest and use of new technologies [78]. This confirmed that the factor defined students’ feelings when using micro-lectures to help them learn mathematics during the post-pandemic period. Meanwhile, other reports proved that attitude was influenced by several factors, namely performance and effort expectancies, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, price value, and habit [51,79]. A positive correlation was also found between the attitude towards technology and the intention to use new technology [80,81]. This verified that the factor was important in influencing students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures after the pandemic. Thus, in the present study the following is hypothesized:
Hypothesis 12 (H12).
Attitude has a significant effect on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures post-COVID-19.

3. Methods

This study used a quantitative approach: the researcher made an initial hypothesis about what factors influence the students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures in the post-COVID-19 period and finally tested the initial hypothesis using the SEM technique to find the answer. The UTAUT-2 model (Venkatesh et al., 2012) was developed to analyze the determinants with a positive influence on students’ intention to use micro-lectures after the pandemic. The adopted questionnaire used a 5-point Likert scale [82], where 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 = SD, D, n, A, and SA (strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree), respectively [83]. Subsequently, each question item was developed based on the existing literature and instruments in previous studies, as shown in Appendix A.

3.1. Study Instrument

The original English questionnaire was translated and validated by two professors and doctoral students, containing nine determinants with a total of 23 items. Subsequently, the link was transferred to the mathematics teacher for distribution to the students experienced in the utilization of micro-lectures during the pandemic. From January to March 2022, 336 data were obtained, with 321 analytically used due to the incomplete nature of 15. Based on the average, each respondent filled out the questionnaire more than 8 min before submission, with the complete instrument containing various demographic data, such as gender, class, and micro-lectures experience (Table 1).
According to Table 1, 60.44% and 39.56% were female and male students, with 29.28, 34.58, and 36.14% being 9th, 8th, and 7th graders, respectively. Based on the device of study, more than 60% of students had smartphones, tablets, and laptops regarding the utilization of micro-lectures during the pandemic. Approximately 62.62, 28.35, and 9.03% also used micro-lectures to learn mathematics more than four times, once–thrice (1–3), and once a week, respectively.

3.2. Data Collection Technique

A purposive sampling technique [65] was used at one public junior high school in Bandung, where the target samples were students from grades 7–9 (14–17 years) who used micro-lectures as a supplement to learning mathematics during the pandemic. This selection process was conducted based on experience and familiarity with micro-lectures, as participation was voluntary without any form of duress. The samples were also provided with a gift in the form of learning tools as a sign of gratitude for seriously participating in the exercise. In addition, informed consent was obtained from all the study participants.

3.3. Ethical Considerations

Although the participants were provided with rewards, compliance with all study ethics was still very important during coding, analysis, and data collection. All responses also remained anonymous for the prevention of bias [8].

3.4. Data Analysis

A structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to test the predictive models and analyze the relationship among variables. This approach has been widely used in the social science fields to analyze and evaluate the suitability of the theoretical model through empirical data [60,84,85]. SEM is also appropriately considered to test the assumptions in student or teacher acceptance of online learning media [86,87], such as micro-lectures. Meanwhile, the literature on SEM has demonstrated the need to adopt different approaches, based on the type of study, as well as sample normality and size [88]. In the present report, covariance-based SEM was used according to the referential recommendations from Hair et al. [89], where the objectives were to test, confirm, and compare alternative theories. This indicated that the first and second reflective measures were used according to the techniques frequently used in UTAUT-2, the theoretical approach, and the modelling. Based on a strong literature review, UTAUT-2 was modified by adding an attitude being influenced by PE, EE, HB, and HM, with SEM analyzing and interpreting the reliability of measurement and structural models, which specifically incorporated a linear specification reflecting the dependencies between the latent and the measured variable. In this present condition, all the analyses were performed with AMOS software, with the reliability test being conducted through the CFA-based Cronbach alpha and CR (composite reliability) [90,91]. Additionally, subsequent analysis was performed on each latent variable, t-value, as well as the item loading and AVE for each question and construct, respectively [84,92].

4. Results

Before conducting a path analysis and developing conclusions on the influential factors, the data normality, as well as assessment of the measurement and structural models, were initially evaluated. In this condition, the reliability, as well as convergent and discriminant validity (CV and DV) tests, were used to evaluate the measurement model based on suggestions [93,94]. Furthermore, the structural models were often used to measure the strength and direction of each construct.

4.1. Normality Analysis

The data normality test (Table 2) was analyzed with the skewness and kurtosis values on each variable, which were between −0.795 and −0.112 and between −0.978 and 4.156. With both values between ±3 and ±10 for skewness and kurtosis, the data were observed to be normally distributed [50].

4.2. Measurement Model for Measuring Reliability and Validity

The reliability test is often found to reflect the internal stability and consistent level of each measurement questionnaire [95]. This indicated that a good reliability questionnaire was obtained when the Cronbach α > 0.7 [89]. In this report, the Cronbach’s alpha value on each construct ranged between 0.74–0.95, confirming the existence of high questionnaire reliability and internal consistency between latent variables. It also analyzed the loading factor, composite reliability, and average extraction variation to assess convergence validity. In Table 3, the AVE, loading factor, and CR values are found to be more than 0.5, 0.7, and 0.5, respectively [96], indicating a very good convergent validity for this model.

4.3. Discriminant Validity

To analyze the discriminant validity (DV) for each construct, the square root of the AVE values was calculated and compared with the correlation coefficient. The bold diagonal values are the square root of AVE, which needs to be greater than the inter-construct correlations below to meet discriminant validity. This shows that DV is accepted when the results are greater than the correlations for each construct. In this case, the square root of the AVE values exceeded the correlation coefficients for all constructs [97], as shown in Table 4.

4.4. Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Based on the recommendation from Hair et al. [98], the structural model should be measured using the highest likelihood estimation process, through the goodness-of-fit analysis. Table 5 shows the goodness-of-fit values for the assessment model. This revealed that the absolute (CMIN/df = 2.83; GFI = 0.87, RMR = 0.02; RMSEA = 0.07), incremental (AGFI = 0.82; NFI = 0.92; CFI = 0.95), and parsimonious (PNFI = 0.72; PGFI = 0.62) SEM measurements of the proposed model had a good fit. According to Doll [99] and Hair [100], the GFI and NFI greater than 0.8 showed acceptable fits.
For endogenous variables, the R2 data were considered the most important criterion when testing a structural model, although no agreed standard was recently observed [60]. Based on this condition, a Cohen’s standard [102] was used to interpret the R2 value, where a large and small explanatory power was found above 0.26 and 0.02, respectively. Furthermore, the R2 values for students’ attitude and continuous intention towards the use of micro-lectures in the post-pandemic period were 0.745 (74.5%) and 0.781 (78.1%), respectively, indicating that the model had a large explanatory power. This was then compared to the UTAUT-2 model (54% explanatory power) to explain usage behavior for new technology.

4.5. Structural Model and Hypothesis Test

An assessment of the structural coefficient was presented to analyze the proposed model, which aimed to predict students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures in mathematics lessons (Figure 3). The results confirmed that this model was quite suitable for behavioral explanations, due to the goodness-of-fit being observed in acceptable ranges.
Based on Figure 3 and Table 6, students’ attitude towards mathematical micro-lectures was positively influenced by EE (β = 0.620, p < 0.001) and HM (β = 0.313, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the continuous intention to use micro-lectures during the post-pandemic period was positively influenced by ATT (β = 0.175, p < 0.05) and HB (β = 0.445, p < 0.001). This states that two constructs had significant positive and direct impacts on students’ attitudes and continuous intention.
The most significant positive factor that directly affects students’ attitudes towards micro-lectures was found to be effort expectation. The results show that micro-lectures were easy to use during the post-pandemic period, so students’ attitudes towards micro-lectures also improved. The factor that had a positive direct effect on attitude was hedonic motivation. The enjoyable learning experience felt by students has a relationship with students’ attitudes towards micro-lectures. Furthermore, the most significant factor that had a direct effect on continuous intention was habit. The results of this study suggest that when the use of micro-lectures has become a habit, the continuous intention of students will also increase. Finally, students’ attitudes towards micro-lectures have a relationship with the continuous intention to use micro-lectures post-COVID-19. If students’ attitudes towards micro-lectures are high, then their continuous intention to use micro-lectures is also high.

5. Discussion

The proposed model was developed by extending the UTAUT-2 to examine the factors affecting students’ attitudes and continuous intention to use micro-lectures in mathematics lessons. This experiment succeeded in theoretically and empirically supporting the applicability of UTAUT-2 as a useful model for appropriately understanding CI (continuous intention). Using questionnaires and SPSS/AMOS software, data were also obtained from junior high school students and analyzed through the SEM technique. The influence results showed that effort expectancy affected the attitude towards micro-lectures. This proved that if students find that reviewing mathematics lessons with the help of micro-lectures did not require a big effort, then students will have a good attitude towards mathematics learning. Moreover, attitude also had an indirect effect on continuous intention. This was in line with a previous study, which showed that effort expectancy affected attitude and intention towards using new technologies [79,103,104]. Another report also verified that people often utilize new technology that is easily understood [105]. Furthermore, hedonic motivation was found to positively affect the attitude towards micro-lectures, indicating that students observed the media to be fun and exciting when learning mathematics. Based on the results, the HM-based micro-lecture had the ability to transform students’ perceptions of the difficulties and boringness of the subject. Hedonic motivation also had a large indirect effect on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures after the pandemic. This was in line with previous studies, where HM had a positive effect on the intention to use new technology. Hedonic motivation is the strongest factor and has the most significant effect on students using animation-based media because of the entertainment effect that exists in animation-based media [106]. In addition, the HM factor also has a significant positive effect that affects the possibility of teachers increasing their use of the mobile internet for teaching because they feel that using mobile internet is an enjoyable experience [62].
Attitude also had a direct effect on students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures after the pandemic. This was in line with previous reports, where attitude was the main factor influencing the intention to use new technologies [77,107,108]. However, it was not the determinant with the biggest effect on students’ CI in the present analysis. This suggests that subsequent experiments should conduct additional analyses to appropriately understand the effect of attitude on the intentions to use new technologies. According to the results, no significant effect was observed for facilitating conditions due to its inability to influence students’ CI to use micro-lectures during the post-pandemic period, as consistently observed in other reports [109]. Moreover, price value did not have a significant effect on mathematical micro-lectures continuous intention, as shown in Martins et al. [68], where PV did not influence the students using digital textbooks. This was not in line with Choi [110], where the factor affected a person’s use of MOOC. It was also supported by a previous report, where PV was more significant in the business and economic fields than in the educational sector [48]. Habit was observed to have the most significant effect on students’ CI to use micro-lectures after the pandemic. This was because the utilization of the media to learn mathematics had become a habit during the COVID-19 period, for approximately 2 years. In this condition, students were found to often use micro-lectures to prepare and review lessons before and after classes. The results also stated that they liked watching micro-lectures while performing their homework. Therefore, both students and teachers are found to continuously use new technology when it has become a habit. This was in line with a previous review, where HB affected the intention and behavior to use new technology.

6. Theoretical and Practical Implications

Theoretical and practical implications are provided for the maintenance of using micro-lectures during the post-pandemic period. The increased use of this media is also expected to improve students’ learning outcomes and mathematical abilities.
This is the first study to extend UTAUT-2 in explaining the continuous intention of using micro-lectures after the COVID-19 pandemic. The results suggest that the extended model provided empirical evidence of CI in the mathematical learning media. This theoretically provides valuable insight into the attitude and continuous intention of this educational field. It also provides additional knowledge on the CI theory of using micro-lectures. Therefore, the development of the UTAUT-2 model theoretically provides possible prospects for future reports. This is useful for micro-lecture developers and schools to identify the influential factors that should be considered when developing several strategies. It also confirms that habit is a significantly important predictor in influencing students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures after the pandemic.
Firstly, principals and teachers should continuously familiarize students with the internal and external use of micro-lectures as additional learning media, based on the influence of ATT, EE, and HB on CI. Secondly, mathematics teachers need to create many interesting and attractive educational media. Thirdly, the resolution of micro-lectures should be optimal and appropriate to meet the needs of students, as problems are often encountered with internet quotas. Fourthly, the ease of using this media for learning must be considered, with teachers also explaining the methods of effectively using the educational tools for mathematical knowledge. Fifthly, the duration of the micro-lectures is also another factor to be considered, as a long watch often breaks concentration and causes fatigue. When developing this learning media, teachers and schools should abide by the duration suggested by previous studies, which is not more than 10 min. This enables students to stay focused, as well as to not become bored and frustrated when using micro-lectures to learn mathematics.
After the pandemic, mathematics teachers are expected to be busy again with various activities, such as teaching preparation, administration, homework, and developing practice questions, which allows less time to create micro-lectures as a supplement for students. This explains that the key to using the learning media remains with the teacher, as the school and creation team are expected to support the educator’s development needs. When supported with adequate infrastructures such as hardware, software, and the internet, teachers are more likely to continuously develop micro-lectures for students. This confirms that the habit of using the media for learning is influenced by many aspects, including teachers and schools. Therefore, familiarizing students with the use of micro-lectures as an additional mathematical learning supplement is one of the methods of improving and increasing educational abilities and effectiveness during the post-pandemic period.

7. Conclusions

This study was conducted to explain and predict the factors influencing students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures to learn mathematics after the pandemic based on the UTAUT-2 model, with SEM being utilized to validate and develop conclusions. The empirical results showed that ATT and HB were the strongest predictors of factors influencing students’ continuous intention to use micro-lectures after the pandemic, with HM and EE also having a significant effect on learning attitude. Moreover, habit was the most significant factor influencing the CI to use this educational media. This report contributed to the increase in using micro-lectures after the COVID-19 period, which proved to improve learning outcomes. It also contributed to the awareness of developing countries with various factors in mathematical fields, such as attitudes towards online learning media.

8. Limitations

Firstly, the study is limited to the junior high school level in Bandung, Indonesia, with the sole focus on the continuous intention to use mathematical micro-lectures after the COVID-19 pandemic. The results are also not generalized to all educational levels, indicating a lack of studies at elementary, senior high, and tertiary institutions. Secondly, other reports commonly considered the extension of the TAM-2 model, due to it being widely used to analyze behavioral intention towards the use of new technology. Thirdly, it is undeniable that the use of micro-lectures is also influenced by teachers and schools, with many studies showing that students often used online learning media when instructed. Therefore, a subsequent study is suggested to examine the factors influencing the intention of teachers to teach mathematical micro-lectures. Fourthly, the moderating effects of gender and educational level were not assessed on the continuous intention to use this learning media. This indicates that subsequent studies need to examine this relationship. Fifthly, there is a need for future research to support a deeper understanding through a mixed-method approach when investigating the factors affecting junior high school students to use mathematical micro-lectures after the pandemic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.T.W.; methodology, T.T.W.; validation, R.W.; formal analysis, T.T.W. and R.W.; investigation, R.W.; project administration, T.T.W.; writing—original draft, T.T.W. and R.W.; writing—review and editing, T.T.W. and R.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous region postgraduate Education Project (2020JGA129) and improve teaching ability of elementary and secondary school teaching project (JSSKT2020012).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Professor Jianlan Tang and Professor Yiming Cao who generously offered their time, insights in our study. And we also wish to thank Professor Zsolt Lavicza for his valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

ItemPerformance ExpectancySource
PE1I continue to use YouTube after the pandemic because it helps me understand math material[53]
PE2I continue to use YouTube after the pandemic because it improves my math scores
Effort expectancy
EE1I do not need much effort when using micro-lectures to learn math[53]
EE2I assume learning math through YouTube is easy
EE3 Micro-lectures are easy to use
Social influence
SI1My teacher advised me to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic
SI2My friends use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic
Facilitating condition
FC1I have a cellphone, laptop, or tablet to learn math through YouTube [53]
FC2People are helping me when I do not know how to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic
Hedonic motivation [48]
HM1I continue to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic because it is fun
HM2I continue to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic because it is entertaining
HM3I continue to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic because it is so much fun
Price value [48]
PV1I continue to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic because it is cheap
PV2I continue to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic because internet costs are affordable
PV3I continue to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic because the internet price is acceptable
Continuous intention[111,112]
CI1I continue to use YouTube to learn math after the pandemic
CI2I recommend the micro-lectures to learn maths to my friends
Habits
HB1I continue to use YouTube to learn math after the pandemic because I am used to it[48]
HB2I continue to use YouTube to learn after the pandemic because I am used to repeating math lessons
HB3I continue to use YouTube to study maths after the pandemic because I am used to using it to do my homework
Attitude
ATT1Learning math using YouTube after the pandemic is a good idea[92,113]
ATT2Learning math using YouTube after the pandemic is very interesting for me
ATT3Learning math using YouTube after the pandemic is so much fun

References

  1. Al-Balas, M.; Al-Balas, H.I.; Jaber, H.M.; Obeidat, K.; Al-Balas, H.; Aborajooh, E.A.; Al-Taher, R.; Al-Balas, B. Correction to: Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: Current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Med. Educ. 2020, 20, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Prasetyanto, D.; Rizki, M.; Sunitiyoso, Y. Online Learning Participation Intention after COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Do Students Still Make Trips for Online Class? Sustainability 2022, 14, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rannastu-Avalos, M.; Siiman, L.A. Challenges for Distance Learning and Online Collaboration in the Time of COVID-19: Interviews with Science Teachers; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 12324 LNCS. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nuere, S.; de Miguel, L. The Digital/Technological Connection with COVID-19: An Unprecedented Challenge in University Teaching. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 2020, 26, 931–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nayak, B.; Bhattacharyya, S.S.; Goswami, S.; Thakre, S. Adoption of online education channel during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic lockdown: An empirical study from push–pull-mooring framework. J. Comput. Educ. 2022, 9, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Navarro, M.M.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Young, M.N.; Nadlifatin, R.; Redi, A.A.N.P. The perceived satisfaction in utilizing learning management systems among engineering students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Integrating task technology fit and extended technology acceptance model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Uymaz, P.; Uymaz, A.O. Assessing acceptance of augmented reality in nursing education. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mulyono, H.; Suryoputro, G.; Jamil, S.R. The application of WhatsApp to support online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kusumadewi, R.F.; Islam, U.; Agung, S. Developing electronic teaching materials through comic mathematics media to increase student learning independence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. İlköğretim Online 2021, 20, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramadhani, R.; Fitri, Y. EPUB3 Based Mathematical E-Modules Using the Sigil Application as A Solution in Teaching and Learning Process through COVID-19 Pandemic. Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA 2021, 11, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Amalia, R.R.; Anggoro, S.; Eka, K.I. Identification of Teachers and Students’ Readiness to E-Learning Implementation. J. Teach. Learn. Elem. Educ. 2021, 4, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarah, L.L. The implementation of discovery learning using personal site in physics online classroom. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1957, 012042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aryanti; Wijaya, T.T. Elementary Students ’ Attitudes towards an Online Visiting Lecture in COVID-19 School Closure Period. J. Teach. Learn. Elem. Educ. 2022, 5, 81–94. [Google Scholar]
  14. Weinhandl, R.; Houghton, T.; Lindenbauer, E.; Mayerhofer, M.; Lavicza, Z. Integrating Technologies Into Teaching and Learning Mathematics at the Beginning of Secondary Education in Austria Integrating Technologies into Teaching and Learning Mathematics at the Beginning of Secondary Education in Austria. EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2021, 17, em2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, X.; Liu, J. Education in and after COVID-19: Immediate Responses and Long-Term Visions. Postdigital Sci. Educ. 2020, 2, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Maqableh, M.; Alia, M. Evaluation online learning of undergraduate students under lockdown amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The online learning experience and students’ satisfaction. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2021, 128, 106160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jevsikova, T.; Stupuriene, G.; Stumbriene, D.; Juškevičiene, A.; Dagiene, V. Acceptance of Distance Learning Technologies by Teachers: Determining Factors and Emergency State Influence. Informatica 2021, 32, 517–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Chan, M.C.E.; Kang, Y. Post-pandemic reflections: Lessons from Chinese mathematics teachers about online mathematics instruction. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2021, 22, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alabdulwahhab, K.M.; Kazmi, S.Y.; Sami, W.; Almujel, K.N.; Alanazi, M.H.; Alanazi, K.F.; Moyana, A.M.; Ahmad, M.S.; Alasbali, T.A.; Al Alwadani, F. Use of online resources by undergraduate medical students at College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kramarski, B.; Liberman, A. Using Electronic Mail Communication and Metacognitive Instruction to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Padaguri, V.; Pasha, S.A. Investigating the Intentions to Adopt E-Learning using UTAUT-3 model: A Perspective of COVID-19. In Proceedings of the AUBH E-Learning Conference Innovative Learning and Teaching: Lessons from COVID-19 SYNCHRONOUS, Manama, Bahrain, 24–26 May 2021; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fitzgerald, D.A.; Scott, K.M.; Ryan, M.S. Blended and e-learning in pediatric education: Harnessing lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2021, 181, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lapitan, L.D.; Tiangco, C.E.; Sumalinog, D.A.G.; Sabarillo, N.S.; Diaz, J.M. An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 35, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, M. An Overview of Micro-Lecture in College English Teaching in Mainland China. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2017, 5, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, K.; Zhu, C.; Tondeur, J.; Wang, K. Using micro-lectures in small private online courses: What do we learn from students ’ behavioural intentions? Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 2021, 30, 427–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fauzi, I.; Hermawan, I.; Khusuma, S. Teachers’ Elementary School in Online Learning of COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions. J. Iqra’ Kaji. Ilmu Pendidik. 2020, 5, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chick, R.C.; Clifton, G.T.; Peace, K.M.; Propper, B.W.; Hale, D.F.; Alseidi, A.A.; Vreeland, T.J. Using Technology to Maintain the Education of Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Surg. Educ. 2020, 77, 729–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Osorio-saez, E.M.; Eryilmaz, N.; Sandoval-hernandez, A. Parents’ Acceptance of Educational Technology: Lessons from around the World. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 719430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, Z.; Xiao, L.; Hou, M.; Liu, X.; Liu, J. Micro classes as a primary school–level mathematics education response to COVID-19 pandemic in China: Students’ degree of approval and perception of digital equity. Educ. Stud. Math. 2021, 108, 65–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Peng, Y. Application of Micro-lecture in Computer Teaching. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 234, 012053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, S. The Application of Micro Lecture in English Reading Teaching. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Tianjin, China, 11–12 June 2016; pp. 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, N.; Tan, L.; Li, F.; Han, B.; Xu, Y. Development and application of digital assistive teaching system for anatomy. Virtual Real. Intell. Hardw. 2021, 3, 315–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sartika, N.S.; Mauladaniyati, R. Analysis of Prospective Mathematics Teachers ’ Reading Interest Through E-Book for Geometry Systems Course in New Normal Era. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Studies in Mathematics (ICoESM 2021), Virtual, 13 August 2021; Volume 611, pp. 353–359. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, X.; Xu, J. Integration of Micro Lectures into the Blended Learning Discourse in Tertiary Education. Asian Assoc. Open Univ. J. 2015, 10, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wijaya, T.T.; Cao, Y.; Weinhandl, R.; Yusron, E. Applying the UTAUT Model to Understand Factors Affecting Micro-Lecture Usage by Mathematics Teachers in China. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tian, D. Micro-Lecture Design and Practice In The Internet Plus Era. Adv. Comput. Sci. Res. 2017, 74, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lavidas, K.; Komis, V.; Achriani, A. Explaining faculty members’ behavioral intention to use learning management systems. J. Comput. Educ. 2022, 5, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Taamneh, A.; Alsaad, A.; Elrehail, H.; Al-Okaily, M.; Lutfi, A.; Sergio, R.P. University lecturers acceptance of moodle platform in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Glob. Knowl. Mem. Commun. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, D.; Luo, J. College Learning from Classrooms to the Internet: Adoption of the YouTube as Supplementary Tool in COVID-19 Pandemic Environment. Educ. Urban Soc. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fitriani, W.R.; Mulyono, A.B.; Hidayanto, A.N.; Munajat, Q. Reviewer’s communication style in YouTube product-review videos: Does it affect channel loyalty? Heliyon 2020, 6, e04880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wijaya, T.T.; Ying, Z.; Purnama, A. Using Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics Software in Teaching Trigonometry. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020, 15, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hermita, N.; Putra, Z.H.; Alim, J.A.; Tang, J.; Wijaya, T.T.; Li, L.; Pereira, J.; Tamur, M. The Hungry Ant: Development of Video-Based Learning on Polyhedron. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 2021, 15, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Han, J. Micro-lecture Teaching for Improving the Learning Effect of Non-English Majors at North China Electric Power University. English Lang. Teach. 2019, 12, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. El Said, G.R. How Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Higher Education Learning Experience? an Empirical Investigation of Learners’ Academic Performance at a University in a Developing Country. Adv. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2021, 2021, 6649524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Piramanayagam, S.; Seal, P.P. Hospitality students’ adoption of e-Books during the COVID-19 pandemic: A developing country perspective. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2021, 2021, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wah, L.L.; Hashim, H. Determining pre-service teachers’ intention of using technology for teaching english as a second language (Esl). Sustainability 2021, 13, 7568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nikou, S.; Aavakare, M. An assessment of the interplay between literacy and digital Technology in Higher Education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26, 3893–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Venkatesh, V.Y.L.; Thong, J.; Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information Technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhao, W.; Mok, I.A.C.; Cao, Y. Factors influencing teachers’ implementation of a reformed instructional model in China from the theory of planned behavior perspective: A multiple case study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Moorthy, K.; Chun T’ing, L.; Ming, K.S.; Ping, C.C.; Ping, L.Y.; Joe, L.Q.; Jie, W.Y. Behavioral Intention to Adopt Digital Library by the Undergraduates. Int. Inf. Libr. Rev. 2019, 51, 128–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chávez Herting, D.; Cladellas Pros, R.; Castelló Tarrida, A. Habit and social influence as determinants of PowerPoint use in higher education: A study from a technology acceptance approach. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2020, 8, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, C.W.; Chao, C.M.; Chang, C.F.; Chen, R.J.; Chen, P.C.; Liu, Y.X. Exploring Behavioral Intention to Use a Mobile Health Education Website: An Extension of the UTAUT 2 Model. SAGE Open 2021, 11, 21582440211055721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Venkatesh, M.; Morris, G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Wijaya, T.T.; Zhou, Y.; Houghton, T.; Weinhandl, R.; Lavicza, Z.; Yusop, F.D. Factors affecting the use of digital mathematics textbooks in indonesia. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chatti, H.; Hadoussa, S. Factors Affecting the Adoption of E-Learning Technology by Students during the COVID-19 Quarantine Period: The Application of the UTAUT Model. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2021, 11, 6993–7000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Balkaya, S.; Akkucuk, U. Adoption and use of learning management systems in education: The role of playfulness and self-management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shao, D.; Lee, I.J. Acceptance and influencing factors of social virtual reality in the urban elderly. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alvi, I. College students’ reception of social networking tools for learning in India: An extended UTAUT model. Smart Learn. Environ. 2021, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Khalid, B.; Chaveesuk, S.; Chaiyasoonthorn, W. Moocs adoption in higher education: A management perspective. Polish J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 23, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shen, C.W.; Ho, J.T.; Ly, P.T.; Kuo, T.C. Behavioural intentions of using virtual reality in learning: Perspectives of acceptance of information technology and learning style. Virtual Real. 2019, 23, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Alowayr, A. Determinants of mobile learning adoption: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol. 2021, 39, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nikolopoulou, K.; Gialamas, V.; Lavidas, K. Habit, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy and technological pedagogical knowledge affect teachers’ intention to use mobile internet. Comput. Educ. Open 2021, 2, 100041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. de Guinea, A.O.; Markus, M.L. Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Q. 2009, 33, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Garg, A. Investigating the Moderating Effects of Age and Gender on Customers’ Use of Tablet Menu in Casual Dining Restaurants. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2021, 22, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Abdul Rabu, S.N.; Hussin, H.; Bervell, B. QR code utilization in a large classroom: Higher education students’ initial perceptions. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 24, 359–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Faqih, K.M.S.; Jaradat, M.I.R.M. Integrating TTF and UTAUT2 theories to investigate the adoption of augmented reality technology in education: Perspective from a developing country. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hu, S.; Laxman, K.; Lee, K. Exploring factors affecting academics’ adoption of emerging mobile technologies-an extended UTAUT perspective. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2020, 25, 4615–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Martins, M.; Farias, J.S.; Albuquerque, P.H.M.; Pereira, D.S. Adoption of technology for reading purposes: A study articles of e-books acceptance. Brazilian Bus. Rev. 2018, 15, 568–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kosiba, J.P.B.; Odoom, R.; Boateng, H.; Twum, K.K.; Abdul-Hamid, I.K. Examining students’ satisfaction with online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic—An extended UTAUT2 approach. J. Furth. High. Educ. 2022, 46, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alyoussef, I.Y. Massive open online course (Moocs) acceptance: The role of task-technology fit (ttf) for higher education sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Alenezi, A.R. Modeling the Social Factors Affecting Students’ Satisfaction with Online Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Educ. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 2594211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yu, H.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Shi, G.; Yang, J. Influence of Online Merging Offline Method on University Students’ Active Learning through Learning Satisfaction. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 842322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, B. Influence of MOOC learners discussion forum social interactions on online reviews of MOOC. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26, 3483–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ly, H.T.; Khuong, N.V.; Son, T.H. Determinants Affect Mobile Wallet Continuous Usage in COVID 19 Pandemic: Evidence From Vietnam. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2022, 9, 2041792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Raffaghelli, J.E.; Rodríguez, M.E.; Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E.; Bañeres, D. Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of an early warning system in Higher Education. Comput. Educ. 2022, 182, 104468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dahri, N.A.; Vighio, M.S.; Bather, J.D.; Arain, A.A. Factors influencing the acceptance of mobile collaborative learning for the continuous professional development of teachers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Acharjya, B.; Das, S. Adoption of E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol. 2022, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pando-Garcia, J.; Periañez-Cañadillas, I.; Charterina, J. Business simulation games with and without supervision: An analysis based on the TAM model. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 1731–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Taylor, S.; Todd, P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 1995, 6, 144–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alamri, M.M. Using blended project-based learning for students’ behavioral intention to use and academic achievement in higher education. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cabero-Almenara, J.; Barroso-Osuna, J.; Martinez-Roig, R. Mixed, augmented and virtual, reality applied to the teaching of mathematics for architects. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. McCarthy, J.W.; Cooley, J.A.; Benigno, J.P. Integrating music into small-group book reading activities increases the engagement of students with autism. Evid. Based. Commun. Assess. Interv. 2010, 4, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Anthony, B.; Kamaludin, A.; Romli, A. Predicting Academic Staffs Behaviour Intention and Actual Use of Blended Learning in Higher Education: Model Development and Validation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Almulla, M.A.; Alamri, M.M. Using conceptual mapping for learning to affect students’ motivation and academic achievement. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kokkinou, E.; Kyriakides, L. Investigating differential teacher effectiveness: Searching for the impact of classroom context factors. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 2022, 33, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Edumadze, J.K.E.; Barfi, K.A.; Arkorful, V.; Baffour, N.O., Jr. Undergraduate student’s perception of using video conferencing tools under lockdown amidst COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Al-Maroof, R.S.; Alnazzawi, N.; Akour, I.A.; Ayoubi, K.; Alhumaid, K.; AlAhbabi, N.M.; Alnnaimi, M.; Thabit, S.; Alfaisal, R.; Aburayya, A.; et al. The effectiveness of online platforms after the pandemic: Will face-to-face classes affect students’ perception of their behavioural intention (BIU) to use online platforms? Informatics 2021, 8, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Morchid, N. The Determinants of Use and Acceptance of Mobile Assisted Language Learning: The Case of EFL Students in Morocco. Arab World Engl. J. 2019, 5, 76–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  90. Castéra, J.; Marre, C.C.; Yok, M.C.; Sherab, K.; Impedovo, M.A.; Sarapuu, T.; Pedregosa, A.D.; Malik, S.K.; Armand, H. Self-reported TPACK of teacher educators across six countries in Asia and Europe. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2020, 25, 3003–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wang, Q.; Zhao, G. ICT self-efficacy mediates most effects of university ICT support on preservice teachers’ TPACK: Evidence from three normal universities in China. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2021, 52, 2319–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Smeda, A.; Shiratuddin, M.F.; Wong, K.W. A structural equation modelling approach for adoption of e-book amongst mathematics and statistics (MAS) students at higher education institutions in Libya. Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol. 2018, 35, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Akbulut, C.; Dindar, A.; Kucuk, S.; Sesen, B. Development and Validation of the ICT-TPACK-Science Scale. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2020, 29, 185–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Elyazgi, M. Validating pupils’ behaviour intention to use e-book technology in their learning. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ahmad, F.A.R.O.B. The Effect of Augmented Reality in Improving Visual Thinking in Mathematics of 10th-Grade Students in Jordan. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  98. Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. Partial least squares: The better approach to structural equation modeling? Long Range Plann. 2012, 45, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Doll, W.; Xia, W.; Torkzadeh, G. A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Q. 1994, 18, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hair, J.; Black, B.; Babin, B.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Prentice Hall: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  101. Browne, M.W.; Cudeck, R. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit; Sage: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  102. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Lawrance Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  103. Lawson-Body, A.; Willoughby, L.; Lawson-Body, L.; Tamandja, E.M. Students’ acceptance of E-books: An application of UTAUT. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2020, 60, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Abu-Al-Aish, A.; Love, S. Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 2013, 14, 82–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. David, A. Relative Effectiveness of Computer-based Instruction, Digital Video and Audio Packages on Students Achievement in ALgebra. Int. J. Res. Sci. Technol. Math. Educ. 2014, 2, 164–180. [Google Scholar]
  106. Dajani, D.; Abu Hegleh, A.S. Behavior intention of animation usage among university students. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Kala, D.; Chaubey, D.S. Examination of relationships among technology acceptance, student engagement, and perceived learning on tourism-related MOOCs. J. Teach. Travel Tour. 2022, 22, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Jiang, H. Students’ Attitudes and Competences in Modeling Using 3D Cartoon Toy Design Maker. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Teo, T. Examining the influence of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2010, 11, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Choi, H.; Hoo-Jo, H. Influential Factors on Elementary School Teachers’ Intention to Use MOOC. Teach. Educ. Res. 2018, 57, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rohan, R.; Pal, D.; Funilkul, S.; Chutimaskul, W.; Eamsinvattana, W. How Gamification Leads to Continued Usage of MOOCs? A Theoretical Perspective. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 108144–108161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Arpaci, I.; Basol, G. The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2020, 25, 3503–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Agustyaningrum, N.; Kepulauan, U.R.; Mahmudi, A. Dominant Factors that Cause Students ’ Difficulties in Learning Abstract Algebra: A Case Study at a University in Indonesia. Int. J. Instr. 2021, 14, 847–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The original UTAUT-2 model with moderator variable.
Figure 1. The original UTAUT-2 model with moderator variable.
Electronics 11 01924 g001
Figure 2. The proposed model and hypothesis.
Figure 2. The proposed model and hypothesis.
Electronics 11 01924 g002
Figure 3. The SEM for the proposed model. Note: PV = price value, FC = facilitating conditions, SI = social influence, HM = hedonic motivation, HB = habit, EE = effort expectancy, PE = performance expectancy, ATT = attitude, and CI = continuous intention.
Figure 3. The SEM for the proposed model. Note: PV = price value, FC = facilitating conditions, SI = social influence, HM = hedonic motivation, HB = habit, EE = effort expectancy, PE = performance expectancy, ATT = attitude, and CI = continuous intention.
Electronics 11 01924 g003
Table 1. The demographic data.
Table 1. The demographic data.
Factor n%
GenderMale19460.44%
Female12739.56%
Use micro-lectures to learn mathMore than 4 times a week20162.62%
1–3 times a week9128.35%
Once a week299.03%
Class711636.14%
811134.58%
99429.28%
The device used to open the micro-lecturesSmartphone29792.5%
Tablet24175.08%
Laptop/computer20162.61%
Table 2. Normality testing and descriptive statistics.
Table 2. Normality testing and descriptive statistics.
VariableMinMaxSkewnessc.r.Kurtosisc.r.
HM11.0005.000−0.332−2.4300.5441.989
HM21.0005.000−0.216−1.5790.4791.753
HM31.0005.000−0.395−2.8920.5572.036
PE11.0005.000−0.475−3.4730.2420.887
PE21.0005.000−0.387−2.8300.0020.006
CI21.0005.000−0.136−0.9970.4631.692
CI11.0005.000−0.138−1.0090.8383.063
ATT11.0005.000−0.112−0.8180.4881.783
ATT21.0005.000−0.418−3.0570.5391.972
ATT31.0005.000−0.169−1.2360.4431.621
PV11.0005.000−0.318−2.324−0.267−0.978
PV21.0005.000−0.382−2.797−0.067−0.244
PV31.0005.000−0.427−3.1270.0620.225
FC11.0005.000−0.795−5.8150.9653.530
FC21.0005.000−0.512−3.7410.1110.404
SI11.0005.000−0.474−3.4690.5141.879
SI21.0005.000−0.262−1.9151.1374.156
HB11.0005.000−0.192−1.4060.4631.693
HB21.0005.000−0.182−1.3340.0310.114
HB31.0005.000−0.268−1.9590.4691.716
EE11.0005.000−0.343−2.5080.3041.111
EE21.0005.000−0.233−1.7070.0770.283
EE31.0005.000−0.197−1.4420.0410.149
Multivariate 196.09951.802
Table 3. The measurement construct validity (n = 321).
Table 3. The measurement construct validity (n = 321).
ConstructItemsMeanSDFactor LoadingCronbach AlphaCRAVE
Performance
expectancy
PE23.560.900.810.9270.810.68
PE33.420.940.80
Effort
expectancy
EE13.550.830.560.7420.770.53
EE23.380.860.65
EE33.270.890.78
Habit HB13.360.820.920.8920.930.81
HB23.430.870.86
HB33.350.830.81
Hedonic motivationHM13.340.830.930.9550.960.90
HM23.340.880.93
HM33.330.870.93
Social influenceSI13.450.900.820.760.830.71
SI23.310.750.76
Facilitating conditionsFC13.780.890.750.780.710.55
FC23.430.930.66
Price valuePV13.421.030.890.930.930.81
PV23.310.970.90
PV33.290.950.89
Attitudes towards micro-lecturesATT13.520.860.900.940.960.89
ATT23.420.780.94
ATT33.420.830.92
Continuous intentionCI13.310.750.940.910.950.90
CI23.380.810.91
Table 4. The discriminant validity test.
Table 4. The discriminant validity test.
PVFCSIHMHBEEPEATTCI
PV0.770
FC0.3700.375
SI0.4000.3090.325
HM0.5430.3430.3830.673
HB0.4750.3660.3690.5070.554
EE0.4090.2930.3110.3840.3600.322
PE0.2750.2330.2540.3220.3160.2490.530
ATT0.4810.3320.3560.5090.4490.3620.2820.587
CI0.4250.3130.3380.4250.4410.3310.2860.4160.494
Table 5. Measurement for model fit *.
Table 5. Measurement for model fit *.
MeasurementFit IndicationObtained ValueRecommended Criteria
Absolute fit measuresCMIN/df2.831< x < 3
GFI0.87>0.8
RMSEA0.07<0.08
RMR0.02<0.08
Incremental fit measuresNFI0.92>0.8
CFI0.95>0.8
AGFI0.822>0.8
Parsimonious fit measuresPNFI0.72>0.05
PGFI0.62>0.05
* Source: Browne and Cudeck [101].
Table 6. Hypothetical analysis. Note: *** p < 0.001.
Table 6. Hypothetical analysis. Note: *** p < 0.001.
HypothesisRelationshipEstimateS.E.C.R.p-ValueInterpretation
0.050.01
H1APerformance expectancyAttitude−0.0310.058−0.5370.591RejectedRejected
H1BPerformance expectancyContinuous intention0.0280.0600.4620.644RejectedRejected
H2AEffort expectancyAttitude0.6200.1623.834***AcceptedAccepted
H2BEffort expectancyContinuous intention0.0630.6200.1020.919RejectedRejected
H3AHabitAttitude0.1380.1061.3010.193RejectedRejected
H3BHabitContinuous intention0.4450.1143.892***AcceptedAccepted
H4AHedonic motivationAttitude0.3130.0793.974***AcceptedAccepted
H4BHedonic motivationContinuous intention−0.1250.087−1.4310.152RejectedRejected
H5Social InfluenceContinuous intention0.6240.7580.8240.410RejectedRejected
H6Facilitating conditionsContinuous intention−0.2140.244−0.8730.382RejectedRejected
H7Price valueContinuous intention−0.0090.072−0.1270.899RejectedRejected
H8AttitudeContinuous intention0.1750.0762.2880.022AcceptedRejected
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wijaya, T.T.; Weinhandl, R. Factors Influencing Students’ Continuous Intentions for Using Micro-Lectures in the Post-COVID-19 Period: A Modification of the UTAUT-2 Approach. Electronics 2022, 11, 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131924

AMA Style

Wijaya TT, Weinhandl R. Factors Influencing Students’ Continuous Intentions for Using Micro-Lectures in the Post-COVID-19 Period: A Modification of the UTAUT-2 Approach. Electronics. 2022; 11(13):1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131924

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wijaya, Tommy Tanu, and Robert Weinhandl. 2022. "Factors Influencing Students’ Continuous Intentions for Using Micro-Lectures in the Post-COVID-19 Period: A Modification of the UTAUT-2 Approach" Electronics 11, no. 13: 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131924

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop