Toward Smart Communication Components: Recent Advances in Human and AI Speaker Interaction

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper  investigates 
smart communication interaction bwteen  human and AI speaker. However, the contribution is weak. 
 The structure  is simple. The main results have less theoretic level since for the combinatorial  simple description  the  interaction human and AI speaker
 involves less creativity.   The writing is too poor.  The grammar  errors are found in many places. The uppercase and lowercase letters are chaos in the titles of the sections.   The tenses in the same paragraph should be unified. 
  Many figures are unclear.  The  following related complex system optimal control and analysis references should be cited to 
highlight the motivation. [1] Low-complexity tracking control of strict-feedback systems with unknown control directions, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2019, 64(12): 5175-5182.
[2]  Admissibility and robust stabilization of continuous linear singular fractional order systems with the fractional order α: The 0<α<1 case, ISA Transactions, 82:42-50, 2018.

Author Response

Please see the attach. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Your paper could improve in a number of areas such as a more thorough discussion of the design, development, testing and evaluation results; clarifying the key significance of the research contribution; ascertaining that the research fits the aims and scope of the journal; and a better command and flow of English writing throughout the paper.  
The references should be updated with the most recent in your paper's research field of relevance. I recommend the authors to consult the following survey and empirical papers to contextualize your findings. This should help the readers to understand the novelty of your work. 
A group decision making model for integrating heterogeneous information, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, DOI: HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2627050
Wang, J.S. Exploring biometric identification in FinTech applications based on the modified TAM. Financ Innov 7, 42 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00260-2

Hu, KH., Hsu, MF., Chen, FH. et al. Identifying the key factors of subsidiary supervision and management using an innovative hybrid architecture in a big data environment. Financ Innov 7, 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-020-00219-9

Author Response

Please see the attach. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors, 

The Paper is well written.  Here are a few suggestions. 

Please include the motivation section which introduced in detail the need for your experiments 

• The literature review can be explored further, such as conversation and dialogue-based search 
• Here are a few suggestive papers for you to review.
  • Kaushik, A., Loir, N., Jones, G.J.F. (2021). Multi-view Conversational Search Interface Using a Dialogue-Based Agent. In: Hiemstra, D., Moens, MF., Mothe, J., Perego, R., Potthast, M., Sebastiani, F. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12657. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72240-1_58
  • https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.03940.pdf
• Please also discuss the evaluation criteria of conversational agents  
  • https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9585/2/1/4
• Please discuss and define RQ with the Hypothesis 

Thanks 

Author Response

Please see the attach. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The comments are modified accordingly.  It is acceptable.

Reviewer 2 Report

I have looked at the revised submission, and I appreciate the effort the authors made. The authors have addressed the main remarks and comments, following the Reviewers' suggestions, and including them appropriately in the new version of the paper. The subject is interesting and the final aim of the contribution is clear. The paper is well written and well-structured enough. Overall, I am satisfied with the authors reply and I think this new version of the paper has earned in terms of completeness and it looks more solid with respect to previous submission. It is my pleasure to recommend for acceptance.