Next Article in Journal
An Experimental Comparison of Galvanically Isolated DC-DC Converters: Isolation Technology and Integration Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of a Charge Pump Circuit and System with Input Impedance Modulation for a Flexible-Type Thermoelectric Generator with High-Output Impedance
Previous Article in Journal
Tracking Control of Single-Axis Feed Drives Based on ADRC and Feedback Linearisation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Valuation of Wind Energy Turbines Using Volatility of Wind and Price
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Fully Integrated AC-DC Converter in 1 V CMOS for Electrostatic Vibration Energy Transducer with an Open Circuit Voltage of 10 V

Graduate School of Integrated Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu 432-8561, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Anritsu Corp., Atsugi 243-8555, Japan.
Electronics 2021, 10(10), 1185; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10101185
Submission received: 11 April 2021 / Revised: 4 May 2021 / Accepted: 14 May 2021 / Published: 15 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Harvesting and Energy Storage Systems)

Abstract

:
This paper proposes an AC-DC converter for electrostatic vibration energy harvesting. The converter is composed of a CMOS full bridge rectifier and a CMOS shunt regulator. Even with 1 V CMOS, the open circuit voltage of the energy transducer can be as high as 10 V and beyond. Bandgap reference (BGR) inputs a regulated voltage, which is controlled by the output voltage of the BGR. Built-in power-on reset is introduced, which can minimize the silicon area and power to function normally found upon start-up. The AC-DC converter was fabricated with a 65 nm low-Vt 1 V CMOS with 0.081 mm2. 1 V regulation was measured successfully at 20–70 °C with a power conversion efficiency of 43%.

1. Introduction

Energy harvesting (EH) is technology for harvesting power for IoT edge devices from environmental energy using energy transducers [1]. Eliminating the replacement of batteries based on EH can reduce the total cost of IoT devices. Electrostatic energy transducers (ES-ETs) can convert vibration energy into electronic power [2,3]. Due to the high output impedance of 1 MΩ or larger, open circuit voltages have to go beyond 10 V to generate power of 10 μW or larger. In [4], a battery charger is proposed using two variable capacitors based on ES-ETs. Capacitance varies with vibration, resulting in variable voltage at the capacitor node. Two capacitors vary out of phase. Thus, the diode connected with those two capacitors flows current from one to the other. The latter capacitor is connected to the battery via another diode. As a result, with sufficient amplitude in the voltage at the capacitor node, the battery can be charged with vibration energy. Another power converter is proposed in [5,6] based on a full bridge rectifier (FBR) followed by a DC-DC buck converter, as shown in Figure 1a. An HV rectifier is composed of four diodes for converting the AC power of ES-ETs into DC power to the converter. As the DC voltage is much higher than the maximum voltage acceptable to sensor CMOS ICs, power management circuits (PMC) in DC/DC converters need to be fabricated using a BCD process, which provides an HV CMOS operating even at high voltages of 10 V or higher. Buck converters require external components such as inductors, capacitors, and resistor (LCRs) to convert the DC input voltage of an order of 10 V into an output voltage of an order of 1 V. The priority in design was power conversion efficiency at a power of 1 mW rather than the cost and form factor. What if the priority should be the cost and form factor? In this work, we focus on the full integration of a converter into the same chip for a sensor/RF, as shown in Figure 1b. Section 2 discusses key design features. Power-on-reset (POR) is a critical block to starting up the operation. A built-in POR with no additional power is proposed. The circuit was fabricated in 65 nm low-Vt CMOS. Experimental results are shown in Section 3. Section 4 compares the circuit features of the proposed circuit with previously reported converters.

2. Circuit Design

2.1. System Design

Figure 2 illustrates a proposed fully integrated AC-DC converter. A cross-coupled CMOS bridge circuit [7] is used in a full bridge rectifier (FBR). An additional diode-connected NMOS (ND) is needed in order to not flow reverse current when the voltages at IN1 and IN2 become lower than the regulated output voltage VDD. An active diode [8] can be placed in parallel with ND to reduce the voltage drop. In this design, low power is prioritized. An active diode requires an opamp, which consumes power. Bandgap reference (BGR) operates with VDD, which is controlled by the output voltage VREF.

2.2. Power Comversion Efficiency

Figure 3 is used to estimate the power conversion efficiency (PCE). When the voltage drop at a rectifier is sufficiently low in comparison with the amplitude of the voltage source (VA) and the DC output (VDD), an average output power can be estimated by (1) in a steady state. The maximum available power PAV, which is defined by the output power when the load resistance is as large as the output impedance of the transducer |ZS|, is given by (2). Then, PCE is calculated by (3). Figure 4 shows η vs. VDD at VA = 10 V, 30 V, 60 V, and 100 V. When VDD is controlled to be 1 V, η decreases as VA (>10 V) increases, which is the weakest point for the proposed circuit. Lower VA, or, in other words, lower output impedance, is preferred for an electrostatic energy transducer.
P OUT ¯ = 2 V OUT 2 π | Z S | { ( V m V OUT ) 2 1 cos 1 ( V OUT V m ) }
P AV ¯ = V m 2 8 | Z S |
η = P OUT ¯ P AV ¯

2.3. Bandgap Reference (BGR)

As the target VDD is 1 V, a current-mode bandgap reference (BGR) [9] was selected in this work. Using low-Vt CMOS, the reference voltage VREF is stable at 0.8 V and higher, as shown in Figure 5a. Operation current IDD, including a current generator, is about 200 nA at VDD = 1 V, as shown in Figure 5b. The detector (DET) controls VDD to be 2X VREF with R0 = R1 (see Figure 2). Table 1 summarizes the simulated results of the AC-DC converter at corner conditions.

2.4. Built-In Power-On Reset (POR)

After the transducer starts generating power, VDD is gradually increased from 0 V. Every building block has its own minimum operating VDD. If pull-down (PD) is enabled below the minimum VDD, the system is latched in that state and therefore VDD should no longer be increased. Power-on reset (POR) aims to remove such misbehavior. Additional low-power POR requires more silicon area and more power. As a result, we simply added a blocking PMOS (PPD), which has a standard threshold voltage in the pull-down path, as shown in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 6a, while VDD is low, VREF can be also lower than VDD/2 because of the misbehavior of the OPAMPs. In that case, the gate voltage VG of the pull-down NMOS (NPD) stays high. Even in such a case, PPD disconnects the path from VDD to ground. The necessary condition for normal operation is that PPD starts conducting after VREF > VDD/2. Figure 6b shows the simulated waveform of the entire system to verify the normal operation during power-up.

2.5. Decoupling Capacitor

To stabilize VDD even with AC input, a decoupling capacitor CVDD needs to be placed. When a maximum output current of 10 μA at AC power frequency of 100 Hz is needed, the capacitance of CVDD is required to be 10 μA X 5 ms/10 mV~5 μF for a ripple in VDD of 10 mV. The entire AC-DC converter is simulated in AC mode, as well as with different capacitance values of CVDD, as shown in Figure 7. The system can be stable with CVDD of 20 nF or larger.

3. Experiments

The proposed AC-DC converter was designed and fabricated in 65 nm low-Vt CMOS, as shown in Figure 8. The majority block was BGR in terms of area. The entire area was 0.081 mm2, which is so small that it can be integrated into the same IoT IC chip. The pulse generator available at the lab only generated an AC peak of 10 V. As a result, the AC-DC converter was measured with a 100 kΩ resistor connected with the AC voltage source to an input power larger than 10 μW. A 6 μF capacitor was connected with VDD.
Figure 9a shows IDD vs. VDD by varying the load resistance RL. The AC-DC converter regulates VDD at 1 V with 10 μA or below. Figure 9b shows the measured waveform at different temperatures. The voltage source starts at 0.1 s with an amplitude of 10 V at 100 Hz. The converter charges up the load capacitance CVDD for 0.25 s until VDD reaches about 1 V. The measured average and ripple of VDD are summarized in Table 2.
To verify the effect of the built-in POR, measurements were also performed by connecting the source and drain of PPD. As shown by “VDD without PMOS” in Figure 10, VDD was stuck at the ground level.

4. Discussions

4.1. Comparison with Previously Reported Converters

Circuit features are compared in Table 3. In [6], the AC-DC converter was composed of FBR and a buck DC-DC converter. To allow for a high voltage input of 60 V at the peak, a BCD process was used, which provided 60 V transistors. Discrete diodes for FBR were required in addition to a converter chip. A high power efficiency of 85% was realized by the buck converter. In [10], another AC-DC converter was presented, which was composed of capacitor divider, switched capacitor converter, and FBR to convert power from 120 V mains. Wiring capacitors were used to manage a high voltage of 168 V without adding extra process steps or devices. As capacitance density was quite low, the converter size needed to be as large as 9.8 mm2. In [11], another AC-DC converter was proposed to generate a standard CMOS-compatible voltage of 2 V from the magnetostrictive energy harvester (MS-EH) with a peak open circuit voltage of 0.5 V. Due to the on-chip oscillator running at 5 MHz to drive a charge pump circuit (CP), the control circuit consumed power of 18 µW. In [12], a DC-DC charge pump was developed for piezo-electric energy harvesting. The voltage conversion ratio was varied for energy efficient power conversion according to VA. Area per maximum output power was realized with 3.1 [mm2/mW]. On the other hand, a shunt regulator was used instead of the buck converter in this work at the cost of a reduction in PCE. However, when the transducer can generate sufficient power for the IoT chip even with the AC-DC converter with 43% PCE, it can be integrated into the same IoT chip without additional discrete components and the buck converter chip. Area per maximum output power was realized with 8.1 [mm2/mW] in measurement and 0.81 [mm2/mW] in simulation under the conditions of RS = 100 kΩ, RL = 10 kΩ, and VA = 30 V.

4.2. Limination of the Proposed Converter on VA and RS of ES-EH

To see which electrical parameters of ES-EH allowed the converter to output a regulated voltage of 1 V, SPICE simulation was performed with various amplitude voltages VA and output resistances RS of ES-EH under the condition of a load resistance of 1 MΩ, as shown in Figure 11. The middle area in blue shows that VDD is regulated between 0.95 V and 1.0 V. ES-EH with too high Rs inputs insufficient power into the regulator against the output power, whereas ES-EH with too low Rs injects too much power so that the PD path cannot pull down to the target regulation point. The lower bound on Rs can be reduced with a larger PD size.

5. Conclusions

This paper proposed an AC-DC converter which does not require external components for rectification and power conversion. It can be integrated in the same IoT chip with a small overhead area of 0.1 mm2. This converter can provide a better option for electrostatic energy harvesting where the cost is the highest priority.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.T.; methodology, Y.I. and T.T.; software, Y.I.; validation, Y.I. and T.T.; formal analysis, Y.I. and T.T.; investigation, Y.I. and T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.I.; writing—review and editing, T.T.; funding acquisition, T.T. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by d-lab.VDEC, Synopsys, Inc., Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Rohm Corp. and Micron Foundation. The authors wish to thank Associate M. Futagawa, H. Hirano and S. Ota for technical discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kazmiersuki, T.; Beedy, S. Energy Harvesting Systems: Principles, Modeling and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 1–78. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fu, Q.; Suzuki, Y.; Suzuki, Y. MEMS vibration electret energy harvester with combined electrodes. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), San Francisco, CA, USA, 26–30 January 2014; pp. 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hashiguchi, G. Electromechanical theory of microelectromechanical devices. IEICE Electron. Express 2014, 11, 20142007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. De Queiroz, A.C.M.; Domingues, M. The Doubler of Electricity Used as Battery Charger. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2011, 58, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stanzione, S.; Van Liempd, C.; Van Schaijk, R.; Naito, Y.; Yazicioglu, R.F.; Van Hoof, C. A self-biased 5-to-60 V input voltage and 25-to-1600 µW integrated DC-DC buck converter with fully analog MPPT algorithm reaching up to 88% end-to-end efficiency. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers, San Francisco, CA, USA, 17–21 February 2013; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 74–75. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stanzione, S.; Van Liempd, C.; Nabeto, M.; Yazicioglu, F.R.; Van Hoof, C. 20.8 A 500 nW batteryless integrated electrostatic energy harvester interface based on a DC-DC converter with 60 V maximum input voltage and operating from 1 μW available power, including MPPT and cold start. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference—(ISSCC) Digest of Technical Papers, San Francisco, CA, USA, 22–26 February 2015; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Peters, C.; Kessling, O.; Henrici, F.; Ortmanns, M.; Manoli, Y. CMOS Integrated Highly Efficient Full Wave Rectifier. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 27–30 May 2007; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 2415–2418. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ulusan, H.; Gharehbaghi, K.; Zorlu, O.; Muhtaroglu, A.; Kulah, H. A Fully Integrated and Battery-Free Interface for Low-Voltage Electromagnetic Energy Harvesters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 30, 3712–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Banba, H.; Shiga, H.; Umezawa, A.; Miyaba, T.; Tanzawa, T.; Atsumi, S.; Sakui, K. A CMOS bandgap reference circuit with sub-1-V operation. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 1999, 34, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. De Pelecijn, E.; Steyaert, M.S.J. A Fully Integrated Switched-Capacitor-Based AC–DC Converter for a 120 VRMS Mains Interface. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2019, 54, 2009–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kawauchi, H.; Tanzawa, T. A Fully Integrated Clocked AC-DC Charge Pump for Mignetostrictive Vibration Energy Harvesting. Electronics 2020, 9, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Z.; Law, M.-K.; Mak, P.-I.; Zeng, X.; Martins, R.P. Piezoelectric Energy-Harvesting Interface Using Split-Phase Flipping-Capacitor Rectifier with Capacitor Reuse for Input Power Adaptation. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2020, 55, 2106–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. IoT edge device with an ES-ET and (a) a buck converter with FBR and PMC in a BCD process [6] or (b) a proposed shunt regulator integrated into an IoT chip.
Figure 1. IoT edge device with an ES-ET and (a) a buck converter with FBR and PMC in a BCD process [6] or (b) a proposed shunt regulator integrated into an IoT chip.
Electronics 10 01185 g001
Figure 2. AC-DC converter for an ES-EH proposed in this work.
Figure 2. AC-DC converter for an ES-EH proposed in this work.
Electronics 10 01185 g002
Figure 3. Circuit model for estimating the power conversion efficiency. (a) Circuit model; (b) voltage waveform.
Figure 3. Circuit model for estimating the power conversion efficiency. (a) Circuit model; (b) voltage waveform.
Electronics 10 01185 g003
Figure 4. PCE η vs. VDD at VA = 10 V, 30 V, 60 V, and 100 V.
Figure 4. PCE η vs. VDD at VA = 10 V, 30 V, 60 V, and 100 V.
Electronics 10 01185 g004
Figure 5. (a) Simulated VREF vs. VDD and (b) IDD vs. VDD.
Figure 5. (a) Simulated VREF vs. VDD and (b) IDD vs. VDD.
Electronics 10 01185 g005
Figure 6. (a) Idea of a built-in POR and (b) the simulated waveform.
Figure 6. (a) Idea of a built-in POR and (b) the simulated waveform.
Electronics 10 01185 g006
Figure 7. Bode plots with CVDD varied. (a) Gain vs. freq.; (b) Phase vs. freq.
Figure 7. Bode plots with CVDD varied. (a) Gain vs. freq.; (b) Phase vs. freq.
Electronics 10 01185 g007
Figure 8. (a) Layout of the AC-DC converter and (b) a die photo.
Figure 8. (a) Layout of the AC-DC converter and (b) a die photo.
Electronics 10 01185 g008
Figure 9. Measured IDD vs. VDD (a) and waveform (b).
Figure 9. Measured IDD vs. VDD (a) and waveform (b).
Electronics 10 01185 g009
Figure 10. Measured waveform with and without PPD.
Figure 10. Measured waveform with and without PPD.
Electronics 10 01185 g010
Figure 11. Simulated VDD with different VA and RS under a load resistance of 1 MΩ in (a) 3D and (b) top view plots.
Figure 11. Simulated VDD with different VA and RS under a load resistance of 1 MΩ in (a) 3D and (b) top view plots.
Electronics 10 01185 g011
Table 1. Simulation result of VDD at corner conditions.
Table 1. Simulation result of VDD at corner conditions.
VDD[V]FFTTSS
0 °C1.01.01.0
27 °C1.01.01.0
70 °C0.901.01.0
Table 2. Measured VDD vs. temperature.
Table 2. Measured VDD vs. temperature.
Temp.VDD
0 °C 1.00   V   ± 20 mV
27 °C 1.05   V   ±   30 mV
70 °C 1.05   V   ±   22 mV
Table 3. Comparison table with previously reported converters.
Table 3. Comparison table with previously reported converters.
Stanzione [6]De Pelecijn [10]Kawauchi [11]Chen [12]This Work
Energy sourceES-EHAC mainsMR-EHPZ-EHES-EH
Voltage conversion: Up or Down?DownDownUpUp/DownDown
ArchitectureFBR and BuckCap-div, SC, and FBRFBR and AC-DC CPFBR and DC-DC CPFBR and Shunt
External componentsFBR (4 diodes)/LCR (1L,1C,2R) None (except for CVDD)
CMOS 0.25 µm 60 V BCD and 3 V CMOS0.35 µm 12 V HV-CMOS65 nm 1 V low-Vt CMOS0.18 µm CMOS65 nm 1 V low-Vt CMOS
VDD regulationN. A.N. A.No regulationN. A.±5%
Control power500 nW50 nW18 µW4 µW (*1)700 nW
Maximum input peak voltage60 V168 V1 VN. A.10 V (measured),
100 V (potentially)
Input power1 µW–1 mW20 µW22 µWN.A. 1 µW–100 µW
Output power1 µW–1 mW20 µW4 µW0.5–64 µW1 µW–100 µW
Power conversion efficiency85%81%23%72% (*1)43%
Die/circuit areaBCD (3 mm2) and CMOS (N.A.)9.8 mm20.11 mm20.2 mm20.081 mm2
Area [mm2]/Max. output power [mW]4.6612.527.53.18.1 (meas.),
0.81 (sim.) (*2)
(*1) The data were taken from the condition of VOUT = 2 V and VA = 3 V. (*2) The data were simulated under the conditions of RS = 100 kΩ, RL = 10 kΩ, and VA = 30 V.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ishida, Y.; Tanzawa, T. A Fully Integrated AC-DC Converter in 1 V CMOS for Electrostatic Vibration Energy Transducer with an Open Circuit Voltage of 10 V. Electronics 2021, 10, 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10101185

AMA Style

Ishida Y, Tanzawa T. A Fully Integrated AC-DC Converter in 1 V CMOS for Electrostatic Vibration Energy Transducer with an Open Circuit Voltage of 10 V. Electronics. 2021; 10(10):1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10101185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ishida, Yosuke, and Toru Tanzawa. 2021. "A Fully Integrated AC-DC Converter in 1 V CMOS for Electrostatic Vibration Energy Transducer with an Open Circuit Voltage of 10 V" Electronics 10, no. 10: 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10101185

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop