Next Article in Journal
Implementation of Circular Economy Principles in Regional Solid Municipal Waste Management: The Case of Sverdlovskaya Oblast (Russian Federation)
Previous Article in Journal
Opportunities and Threats of Implementing Drain Water Heat Recovery Units in Poland
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Physical and Monetary Methods for Estimating the Hidden Trade of Materials

1,2,3,*, 1,2,3, 4 and 5,6
1
Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
2
Xiamen Key Lab of Urban Metabolism, Xiamen 361021, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4
Industrial Ecology Group, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Strasse 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
5
Institute for Advanced Study, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
6
UNEP-Tongji Institute of Environment for Sustainable Development, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2019, 8(2), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020089
Received: 8 March 2019 / Revised: 15 April 2019 / Accepted: 3 May 2019 / Published: 6 May 2019
  |  
PDF [1857 KB, uploaded 6 May 2019]
  |  

Abstract

The hidden trade of a material (e.g., aluminum) refers to the trade of that material embedded in final products (e.g., automobiles). There are two methods for estimating the hidden trade amount of materials: (1) the physical method relies on the physical trade data (measured by physical units) in which products are categorized according to the standard international trade classification codes or the harmonized system codes; and (2) the monetary method relies on the monetary trade data (measured by monetary units) in which products are categorized in accordance to the sectors of an input–output (IO) table. Information on material concentrations in products can be relatively quickly estimated by an IO-based model in the monetary method, but will have to be collected from various sources with intensive time cost in the physical method. Exemplified by the U.S. hidden trade of aluminum, iron, and copper in 2007, this study attempts to compare the two methods. We find that, despite the unavoidable but reasonable differences in the amounts of three metals trade, the results generated by the two methods are consistent with each other pretty well for final products at the level of end-use product groups (e.g., total transportation facilities). However, the comparison for specific products (e.g., automobiles) is challenging or does not generate consistent enough results. We suggest that similar estimations be done for more materials, more countries/territories, and different years, to gain experience, reduce estimation time and costs, and increase the knowledge base on metal flows in society. View Full-Text
Keywords: material flow analysis; hidden trade of materials; anthropogenic metal cycles; industrial ecology material flow analysis; hidden trade of materials; anthropogenic metal cycles; industrial ecology
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, W.-Q.; Ma, Z.-J.; Pauliuk, S.; Wang, T. Physical and Monetary Methods for Estimating the Hidden Trade of Materials. Resources 2019, 8, 89.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Resources EISSN 2079-9276 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top