Eight Tons of Material Footprint—Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Material Footprint and Resource Efficiency Potential Calculations
2.2. The System Boundaries of Household Consumption
- (1)
- Nutrition, including all the foodstuffs and drinks consumed;
- (2)
- Housing, including the housing infrastructure, as well as the use of energy (electricity and heating) for household purposes;
- (3)
- Household goods, including the 12 product groups used by Kotakorpi et al. [39]: clothes, home textiles, furniture, electric appliances, electronic appliances, paper products, jewellery, dishes, tools, toys and leisure equipment, daily consumer goods, other goods;
- (4)
- Mobility, including the use of cars, bicycles and public transport for both everyday mobility and tourism;
- (5)
- Leisure activities including sport and cultural activities either actively or as a spectator;
- (6)
- Other purposes, including goods or services consumed, e.g., accommodation during holiday trips, but excluding services provided by public systems like health care and education.
2.3. Basic Methodological Procedures and Assumptions
3. Literature Review on the Present and Sustainable Resource Use by Households
3.1. Present Level, Composition and Diversity of Resource Use
3.2. Sustainable Future Level of Resource Use
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. A Sustainable Lifestyle of Eight Tons Material Footprint
Consumption component | Status quo material footprint | Sustainable material footprint | Change required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
kg/(person·a) | Share | kg/(person·a) | Share | % | Factor | |
Nutrition | 5,900 | 15% | 3,000 | 38% | –49% | 2.0 |
Housing | 10,800 | 27% | 1,600 | 20% | –85% | 6.8 |
Household goods | 3,000 | 7% | 500 | 6% | –83% | 6.0 |
Mobility | 17,300 | 43% | 2,000 | 25% | –88% | 8.7 |
Leisure activities | 2,000 | 5% | 500 | 6% | –75% | 4.0 |
Other purposes | 1,400 | 3% | 400 | 5% | –71% | 3.5 |
Total | 40,400 | 100% | 8,000 | 100% | –80% | 5.1 |
4.2. Nutrition
Nutrition—from 5.9 to 3 tons/(person·a) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction required by | Factor 2 | Direct consumption amount | Present | 840 kg (including drinks) [45] | |
Future | 600 kg (including drinks) | ||||
Share in household’s material footprint | Present | 15% | Material intensity | Present | 7 kg/kg (including drinks) [45] |
Future | 38% | Future | 5 kg/kg (including drinks) | ||
Core statement | The material footprint for nutrition can be reduced from 5.9 to 3 tons/(person·a):
|
4.3. Housing
Housing—from 10.8 to 1.6 tons/(person·a) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction required by | Factor 6.8 | Direct consumption amount | Present | 38 m2/capital (house) [45] 11500 kWh (heat and electricity) [45] | |
Future | 20 m2/capital (zero energy house) 1000 kWh (electricity) | ||||
Share in household’s material footprint | Present | 27% | Material intensity | Present | 65 kg/ m2/a (house, unheated/uncooled) [39] 0.6 kg/kWh (Finnish heat and electricity) [39] |
Future | 20% | Future | 65 kg/ m2/a (house, heated/cooled) 0.3 kg/kWh (European electricity) | ||
Core statement | The material footprint for housing can be reduced from 10.8 to 1.6 tons/(person·a):
|
4.4. Household Goods
Household goods production (cradle to retail)—from 3 to 0.5 tons/(person·a) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction required by | Factor 6 | Direct consumption amount | Present | 1943 items/household (avg), out of which 568 second hand or similar [39] |
Future | less own items | |||
Share in household’s material footprint | Present 7% | Material intensity | Present | 200 kg/(person·a) as an average for the 12 product groups, with a range from 15 to 420 kg/(person·a) per one product group and with only 3 product groups below 170 kg/(person·a) [39] |
Future 6% | Future | 42 kg/(person·a) on average for each of the 12 product groups | ||
Core statement | The material footprint for household goods can be reduced from 3 to 0.5 tons/(person·a) by increasing longevity, decreasing ownership of equipment, increasing sharing options, improving reuse and second hand schemes, etc. |
4.5. Mobility
Mobility—from 17.3 to 2 tons/(person·a) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction required by | Factor 8.7 | Direct consumption amount | Present | 17,500 km | |
Future | 10,000 km | ||||
Share in household’s material footprint | Present | 43% | Material intensity | Present [61] | 1.44 kg/person-km* (private car) 0.53–1.2 kg/person-km (train) 0.06–0.56 kg/person-km (plane) 0.26–0.38 kg/person-km (bus, coach, tram, metro, ferry, bike) |
Future | 25% | Future | 0.2 kg/person-km | ||
Core statement | The material footprint for mobility can be reduced from 17.3 to 2 tons/(person·a):
|
4.6. Leisure Activities
- (1)
- low-infrastructure activities with low material footprints, such as jogging;
- (2)
- group or mass activities with an apparent need for infrastructure, such as using a swimming hall or fitness club, thus requiring a higher amount of resources; and
- (3)
- highly individual and/or infrastructure-intensive activities showing also the highest material footprints, such as golf or sailing.
Leisure Activities—from 2 to 0.5 tons/(person·a) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction required by | Factor 4 | Direct consumption amount | Present | 3.5 h of physical exercise or other leisure activities outside the home [45] | |
Future | 3 h but strongly dependent on the material intensity of the activity | ||||
Share in household’s material footprint | Present | 5% | Material intensity | Present [39] | 1 kg/h for low-infrastructure outdoor activities; 5–15 kg/h for activities requiring infra-structure like buildings, harbours, slopes; ≥30 kg/h for resource-intensive individu-al activities like sailing, golf, motor sport |
Future | 6% | Future | 1–6 kg/h (e.g., 2 × 50 h/a × 1 kg/h + 1 × 50 h/a × 6 kg/h) | ||
Core statement | The material footprint for leisure can be reduced from 2 to 0.5 tons/(person·a):
|
4.7. Resource Use for Other Purposes
Other purposes—from 1.4 to 0.4 tons/(person·a) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction required by | Factor 3.5 | Direct consumption amount | not specified | |
Share in household’s material footprint | Present | 3% | Material intensity | not specified |
Future | 5% | |||
Core statement | The material footprint for other purposes should be reduced from 1.4 to 0.4 tons/(person·a) in order to keep the material footprint of household consumption within the limits of 8 tons/(person·a). |
5. Conclusions
- -
- A reduced consumption of meat and other animal-based foodstuffs;
- -
- A radical reduction of the heating and cooling energy demand of houses;
- -
- A strongly dematerialized, fossile-free electricity production, and a lower level of mobility including a drastically decreased use of private cars.
Acknowledgments
Appendix
Nutrition—from 5.9 to 3 tons/(person·a) | |
---|---|
Central consumption-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Central production-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Housing—from 10.8 to 1.6 tons/(person·a) | |
---|---|
Central consumption-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Central production-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Household goods production (cradle to retail)—from 3 to 0.5 tons/(person·a) | |
---|---|
Central consumption-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Central production-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Mobility—from 17.3 to 2 tons/(person·a) | |
---|---|
Central consumption-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Central production-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Leisure activities—from 2 to 0.5 tons/(person·a) | |
---|---|
Central consumption-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Central production-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Other purposes—from 1.4 to 0.4 tons/(person·a) | |
---|---|
Central consumption-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Central production-related arguments, examples, promising practices |
|
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dittrich, M.; Giljum, S.; Lutter, S.; Polzin, C. Green Economies around the World? Implications of Re-source Use for Development and the Environment; Sustainable Europe Research Institute: Wien, Austria, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Bringezu, S.; Schütz, H.; Saurat, M.; Moll, S.; Acosta-Fernández, J.; Steger, S. Europe’s Resource Use. Basic Trends, Global and Sectoral Patterns and Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts. In Sustainable Resource Management. Global Trends, Visions and Policies; Bringezu, S., Bleischwitz, R., Eds.; Greenleaf: Sheffield, UK, 2009; pp. 52–154. [Google Scholar]
- Bringezu, S. Visions of a sustainable resource use. In Sustainable Resource Management. Global Trends, Visions and Policies; Bringezu, S., Bleischwitz, R., Eds.; Greenleaf: Sheffield, UK, 2009; pp. 155–215. [Google Scholar]
- World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). Living Planet Report 2012: Biodiversity, Biocapacity and Better Choices; Grooten, M., Almond, R., McLellan, R., Eds.; WWF International: Gland, Switzerland, 2012. Available online: http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/1_lpr_2012_online_full_size_single_pages_final_120516.pdf (accessed on 27 June 2014).
- Spangenberg, H.J. Environmental space and the prism of sustainability: Frameworks for indicators measuring sustainable development. Ecol. Indic. 2002, 2, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Münz, R.; Reiterer, A.F. Overgrowded World: Population Explosion and International Migration, 1st ed.; Haus Publishing: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Müller, H. Building a New World Order—Sustainable Policies for the Future, 1st ed.; Haus Publishing: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Jäger, J. Our Planet: How Much More can Earth Take? 1st ed.; Haus Publishing: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Rockström, J. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A. The Wealth of Nations: (A Modern Library E-Book); Random House Publishing Group: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Defila, R.; Guilio, A.; Kaufmann-Hayoz, R. Wesen und Wege Nachhaltigen Konsums: Ergebnisse aus dem Themenschwerpunkt “Vom Wissen zum Handeln—Neue Wege zum Nachhaltigen Konsum”, 1st ed.; Oeconom Verlag: München, Germany, 2011. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Baedeker, C.; Bahn-Walkowiak, B.; Bleischwitz, R.; Kolberg, S.; Mont, O.; Stengel, O.; Stenbæk Hansen, M.; Welfens, M.J. Survey on Consumption Behaviour and Its Driving Forces; European Environment Agency, European Topic Centre on Resource and Waste Management: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Welfens, J.M.; Liedtke, C.; Nordmann, J. Sustainable consumption: Between unsustainable reality and people’s willingsness to act. In Proceedings of the Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation ERSCP-EMSU conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 25–29 October.
- Mont, O. Concept paper for the International Task Force on Sustainable Lifestyles. In Proceedings of the Third International Expert Meeting on Sustainable Consumption and Production; Stockholm, Sweden: 26–29 June 2007.
- Nissinen, A.; Grönroos, J.; Heiskanen, E.; Honkanen, A.; Katajajuuri, J.-M.; Kurppa, S.; Mäkinen, T.; Mäenpää, I.; Seppälä, J.; Timonen, P.; et al. Developing benchmarks for consumer-oriented life cycle assessment-based environmental information on products, services and consumption patterns. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 538–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuittinen, O.; Mokka, R.; Neuvonen, A.; Orjasniemi, M.; Ritola, M.; Wikholm, M. iFuture—The Diversity of Sustainable Lifestyles. In Report D7.3 People’s Forum Workshop Summaries of the Project SPREAD Sustainable Lifestyles 2050; Demos Helsinki: Helsinki, Finland; Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP): Wuppertal, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Liedtke, C.; Buhl, J.; Ameli, H. Microfoundations for sustainable growth with eco-intelligent product service-arrangements. Sustainability 2013, 5, 1141–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Druckman, A.; Chitnis, M.; Sorell, S.; Jackson, T. Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 3572–3581. [Google Scholar]
- Höjer, M.; Mattsson, L. Determinism and backcasting in future studies. Futures 2000, 32, 613–634. [Google Scholar]
- Neuvonen, A.; Kaskinen, T.; Leppänen, J.; Lähteenoja, S.; Mokka, R.; Ritola, M. Lifestyles backcasting as an agency-orientated method for creating sustainable futures. Futures 2014, 58, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholz, R.W.; Lang, D.J.; Wiek, A.; Walter, A.I.; Stauffacher, M. Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2006, 7, 226–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rotmans, J.; Loorbach, D. Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance—A systemic and reflexive approach. In Transitions to Sustainable Development—New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformation Change, 1st ed.; Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J., Eds.; Routledge Chapman & Hall: Loorbach, Germany, 2010; pp. 205–220. [Google Scholar]
- Schneidewind, U. Ein institutionelles Reformprogramm zur Förderung transdisziplinärer Nachhaltigkeitsforschung. GAIA 2010, 19, 122–128. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Geels, F.W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven Transitions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2011, 1, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talwar, S.; Wiek, A.; Robinson, J. User engagement in sustainability research. Sci. Public Policy 2011, 38, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU). World in Transition. A Social Contract for Sustainability. In Flagship Report; WGBU: Berlin, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Lettenmeier, M.; Rohn, H.; Liedtke, C.; Schmidt-Bleek, F. Resource Productivity in 7 Steps. How to Develop Eco-innovative Products and Services and Improve Their Material Footprint; Wuppertal Spezial 41; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt-Bleek, F. Wieviel Umwelt Braucht der Mensch? MIPS—Das Maß für Ökologisches Wirtschaften, 1st ed.; Birkhäuser: Berlin, Germany, 1993. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Lettenmeier, M.; Hirvilammi, T.; Laakso, S.; Lähteenoja, S.; Aalto, K. Material footprint of low-income households in Finland—Consequences for the sustainability debate. Sustainability 2012, 4, 1426–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritthoff, M.; Rohn, H.; Liedtke, C. Calculating MIPS—Resource Productivity of Products and Services, 1st ed.; Wuppertal Spezial 27e; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt-Bleek, F.; Bringezu, S.; Hinterberger, F.; Liedtke, C.; Spangenberg, J.H.; Stiller, H.; Welfens, M.J. MAIA Einführung in Die Material-Intensitäts-Analyse nach dem MIPS Konzept, 1st ed.; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Bringenzu, S.; Schütz, H.; Moll, S. Rationale for and interpretation of economy-wide materials flow analysis and derived indicators. J. Ind. Ecol. 2003, 7, 43–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lähteenoja, S.; Lettenmeier, M.; Kotakorpi, E. The Ecological Rucksack of Households: Huge Differences, Huge Potential for Reduction? In Proceedings of the Sustainable Consumption and Production: Framework for Action: 2nd Conference of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange (SCORE!) Network (Refereed Sessions III-IV), Brussels, Belgium, 10–11 March 2008; Ken, T.G., Tukker, A., Vezzoli, C., Ceschin, F., Eds.; Flemish Institute for Technological Research NV (VITO): Mol, Belgium; The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO): Delft, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 319–337. [Google Scholar]
- Rohn, H.; Pastewski, N.; Lettenmeier, M.; Wiesen, K.; Bienge, K. Resource efficiency potential of selected technologies, products and strategies. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 473–474, 32–35. [Google Scholar]
- Sinivuori, P.; Saari, A. MIPS analysis of natural resource consumption in two university buildings. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saari, A.; Lettenmeier, M.; Pusenius, K.; Hakkarainen, E. Influence of vehicle type and road category on the natural resource consumption in road transport. Transp. Res. Part D 2007, 12, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watson, D.; Acosta Fernández, J.; Wittmer, D.; Gravgård Pedersen, O. Environmental Presssures from European Consumption and Production. A study in integrated environmental and economic analysis. In EEA Technical Report; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2013; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Acosta Fernández, J. Durch den Konsum der Privaten Haushalte Direkt und Indirekt Induzierter TMR, Deutschland; Wuppertal Institute: Wuppertal, Germany, 2005. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Kotakorpi, E.; Lähteenoja, S.; Lettenmeier, M. Household MIPS. Natural resource consumption of Finnish households and its reduction. In The Finnish Environment; Ministry of the Environment: Helsinki, Finland, 2008; p. 43. [Google Scholar]
- Mäenpää, I.; Juutinen, A. Materials Flows in Finland: Resource Use in a Small Open Economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2001, 5, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mäenpää, I. Kansantalouden ainevirtatilinpito. Laskentamenetelmät ja käsitteet. Suomen ainetaseet (National material flow accounting. Calculation methods and glossary. Finnish material balance); Edita Prima Oy: Helsinki, Finland, 1999. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
- Mancini, L.; Lettenmeier, M.; Rohn, H.; Liedtke, C. Application of the MIPS Method for assessing the sustainability of production-consumption systems of food. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2011, 81, 779–793. [Google Scholar]
- Rohn, H.; Lettenmeier, M.; Pastewski, N. Ressourceneffizienz—Potenziale von Technologien, Produkten und Strategien, 1st ed.; Fraunhofer Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 2013. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Geibler, J.; Rohn, H.; Schnabel, F.; Meier, J.; Wiesen, K.; Ziema, E.; Pastewski, N.; Lettenmeier, M.; Resource Efficiency Atlas. An International Perspective on Technologies and Products with Resource Efficiency Potential. In Wuppertal Spezial; Wuppertal Institute: Wuppertal, Germany, 2011; Volume 44. [Google Scholar]
- Lähteenoja, S.; Lettenmeier, M.; Kauppinen, T.; Luoto, K.; Moisio, T.; Salo, M.; Tamminen, P.; Veuro, S. Natural Resource Consumption Caused by Finnish Households. In Proceedings of the Nordic Consumer Policy Research Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 3–5 October 2007; Nordic Council of Ministers, Ministry of Trade and Industry, National Consumer Research Centre: Helsinki, Finland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Laakso, S. Onko Elämä Perusturvan Varassa Kestävää? Ympäristövara Ekologisesti ja Sosiaalisesti Kestävän Kulutuksen Tarkastelussa. Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, December 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Tukker, A.; Cohen, M.J.; Hubacek, K.; Mont, O. The impacts of household consumption and options for change. J. Ind. Ecol. 2010, 14, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seppälä, J.; Mäenpää, I.; Koskela, S.; Mattila, T.; Nissinen, A.; Katajajuuri, J.; Härmä, T.; Korhonen, M.; Saarinen, M.; Virtanen, Y. An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and material flows caused by the Finnish economy using the ENVIMAT model. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1833–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tukker, A.; Huppes, G.; Guinée, J.; Heijungs, R.; De Koning, A.; Oers, L.; Suh, S.; Geerken, T.; Holderbecke, M.; Jansen, B.; Nielsen, P. Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO)—Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25. Main report. IPTS/ESTO project; In Technical Report EUR 22284 EN; European Commission, Joint Research Centre (DG JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies: Seville, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Lettenmeier, M.; Lähteenoja, S.; Hirvilammi, T.; Aalto, K.; Laakso, S. Maximum and Minimum Consumption—A Two-Dimensional Approach in Defining a Decent Lifestyle. In Proceedings of Trends and Future of Sustainable Development, Tampere, Finland, 9–10 June 2011; Lakkala, H., Vehmas, J., Eds.; Finland Futures Research Centre, University of Turku: Turku, Finland, 2011; pp. 202–212. [Google Scholar]
- Lehtinen, A.-R.; Varjonen, J.; Raijas, A.; Aalto, K. What Is the Cost of Living? Reference Budgets or a Decent Minimum Standard of Living. In National Consumer Research Centre Working papers 132/2011; National Consumer Research Centre: Helsinki, Finland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Groezinger, R.; Verbree, R.; Hicks, C.; Ritola, M. Scenarios for sustainable lifestyles. Pathways toward a positive future. Ökom: Ökologisches Wirtschaften, Munich, 2013; Jg. 28, No. 3; pp. 41–46. [Google Scholar]
- Nurmela, J.; Mäenpää, I. Kulutettu Euro Haukkaa 1,5 Kiloa Luontoa (One Euro Consumed Requires 1.5 Kilos of Nature In Finnish); Tieto&trendit 8/2009; Statistics Finland: Helsinki, Finland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ayres, R.U.; Knees, A.V. Production, consumption, and externalities. Am. Econ. Rev. 1969, 59, 282–297. [Google Scholar]
- Baccini, P.; Brunner, P.H. Metabolism of the Anthroposphere, 1st ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt-Bleek, F. The Earth: Natural Resources and Human Intervention, 1st ed.; Haus Publishing: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ekins, P.; Meyer, B.; Schmidt-Bleek, F. Reducing Resource Consumption. A Proposal for Global Resource and Environmental Policy. In Discussion Paper 5; Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung mbH: Osnabrück, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Bringenzu, S.; Schütz, H. Ziele und Indikatoren für die Umsetzung von ProgRess; Ressourcen Politik Arbeitspapier, Arbeitspapier AS 1.2/1.3; Wuppertal Institute: Wuppertal, Germany, 2013; p. 35. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Liedtke, C.; Lettenmeier, M.; Buhl, J.; Teubler, J.; Greiff, K.; Schipperges, M. Discussing the usefulness of statistics for assessing the resource use of households. In Proceedings of the World Resources Forum 2013, Davos, Switzerland, 6–9 October 2013.
- Bringezu, S. Key elements for Economy-wide Sustainable Resource Management (1). Ann. Mines Ser. Responsab. Environ. 2011, 61, 78–87. [Google Scholar]
- Lähteenoja, S.; Lettenmeier, M.; Saari, A. Transport MIPS. Natural Resource Consumption of the Finnish Transport System. In The Finnish Environment; Ministry of the Environment: Helsinki, Finland, 2006; Volume 820. [Google Scholar]
- Leppänen, J.; Neuvonen, A.; Ritola, M.; Ahola, I.; Hirvonen, S.; Hyötyläinen, M.; Kaskinen, T.; Kauppinen, T.; Kuittinen, O.; Kärki, K.; et al. Scenarios for Sustainable Lifestyles 2050: From Global Champions to Local Loops. In Report D4.1 Future Scenarios for New European Social Models with Visualisations of the Project SPREAD Sustainable Lifestyles 2050; Demos Helsinki: Helsinki, Finland; Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP): Wuppertal, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Power, K.; Mont, O. Dispelling the myths about consumption behaviour. In Proceedings of the ERSCP-EMSU Conference “Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation”, Delft, The Netherlands, 25–29 October 2010.
- Kaskinen, T.; Kuittinen, O.; Neuvonen, A.; Mokka, R. Gatekeepers changing consumers’ behaviour in energy consumption. In Future of the Consumer Society, Proceedings of the Conference Future of the Consumer Society, Tampere, Finland, 28–29 May 2009; Koskela, M., Vinnari, M., Eds.; Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Ecnomics: Turku, Finland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Luoto, K.; Lähteenoja, S.; Lettenmeier, M. Liikunta MIPS—Liikuntaharrastusten Luonnonvarojen Kulutus (Exercise MIPS—Consumption of Natural Resources in Exercise); Publications of the National Consumer Research Centre Series 4; National Consumer Research Centre: Helsinki, Finland, 2008. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
- Veuro, S.; Satu, L.; Lettenmeier, M. Vapaa-aikaMIPS—Vapaa-ajan Vieton Luonnonvarojen Kulutus (Hobby MIPS—Consumption of Natural Resources in Leisure Time); Publications of the National Consumer Research Centre Series 5; National Consumer Research Centre: Helsinki, Finland, 2008. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
- Handy, S.L.; Clifton, J.K. Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation 2001, 28, 317–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dombois, O.T.; Braun-Fahrländer, C.; Martin-Diener, E. Comparison of adult physical activity levels in three Swiss alpine communities with varying access to motorized transportation. Health Place 2007, 13, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lettenmeier, M.; Autio, S.; Jänis, R. Project-based learning on life-cycle management—A case study using material flow analysis. In Proceedings of the World Resources Forum 2013, Davos, Switzerland, 6–9 October 2013.
- Türk, V.; Kuhndt, M.; Alakeson, V.; Aldrich, T.; Geibler, J. The Environmental and Social Impacts of Ebanking: A Case Study with Barclays PLC, Final Report; Digital Europe, Wuppertal Institute: Wuppertal, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Rohn, H.; Pastewski, N.; Lettenmeier, M. Resource efficiency of selected technologies, products and strategies: Executive Summary. In Resource Efficiency Paper 1/7; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Leismann, K.; Schmitt, M.; Rohn, H.; Baedeker, C.; Collaborative Consumption. Towards a resource-saving consumption culture. Resources 2013, 2, 184–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lettenmeier, M.; Göbel, C.; Liedtke, C.; Rohn, H.; Teitscheid, P. Material Footprint of a Sustainable Nutrition System in 2050—Need for Dynamic Innovations in Production, Consumption and Politics. In Proceedings of the 6th International European Forum (Igls-Forum) on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks (PFSD 2012), Innsbruck, Austria, 13–17 February 2012; pp. 484–598.
- Kaskinen, T. Peloton Magazine, 1st ed.; Demos Helsinki: Helsinki, Finland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Rohn, H.; Lettenmeier, M. Reducing the Material Footprint of Meals. In Proceedings of the World Resources Forum 2013, Davos, Switzerland, 6–9 October 2013.
- Lettenmeier, M.; Rohn, H. Ökologische Bewertung der Warenverluste: Ressourcennutzung und Umweltbelastung in der Vorkette von Lebensmittelabfällen. In iSuN, Fachhochschule Münster, Münster, Germany (ed.): Verringerung von Lebensmittelabfällen—Identifikation von Ursachen und Handlungsoptionen in Nordrhein-Westfalen; University of Applied Sciences Münster: Münster, Germany; pp. 98–107. (In Germany)
- Bates, A.; Hemenway, T. From agriculture to permaculture. In State of the World 2010: Transforming Cultures from Consumerism to Sustainability; Starke, L., Mastny, L., Eds.; The Worldwatch Institute, WW Norton: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 47–53. [Google Scholar]
- Mancini, L. Food Habits and Environmental Impact: An Assessment of the Natural Resource Demand in Three Agri-Food Chains. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- iSuN (Ed.) Verringerung von Lebensmittelabfällen—Identifikation von Ursachen und Handlungsoptionen in Nordrhein-Westfalen; Fachhochschule Münster: Münster, Germany, 2012. (In Germany)
- Backhaus, J.; Breukers, S.; Mont, O.; Paukovic, M.; Mourik, R. Sustainable lifestyles: Today’s facts & tomorrow’s trends. In D1.1 Sustainable Lifestyles Baseline Report. European Commission, SPREAD Sustainable Lifestyles 2050; ECN: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP): Wuppertal, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Grinewitschus, V.; Lovrić, T.; Rumler, N. Influence of user behavior and home automation on energy consumption. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Domestic Appliances and Lighting (EEDAL’13), Coimbra, Portugal, 11–13 September 2013.
- Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, 53, 13–35.
- Cree Homepage. Available online: http://www.cree.at/en/ (accessed on 18 November 2012).
- Fechner, J.; Lipp, B.; Lechner, R. Bewertete Realisierungsbeispiele im “Haus der Zukunft”. Herausgeber: bmvit, ÖKOinFORM Folder 6. Available online: http://www.hausderzukunft.at/results.html/id1719 (accessed on 14 May 2013.).
- Nieminen, A.; Lettenmeier, M.; Saari, A. Luonnonvarojen Kulutus Suomen Lentoliikenteessä—LentoMIPS. (Natural Resource Consumption in Finnish Air Transport—Flying MIPS); Publications of the Ministry of Transport and Communications Series 57; The Ministry of Transport and Communications: Helsinki, Finland, 2005. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
- Wiesen, K.; Teubler, J.; Rohn, H. Resource use of two wind farms in the German North Sea—The examples of Alpha Ventus and Bard Offshore I. Resources 2013, 2, 504–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samus, T.; Lang, B.; Rohn, H. Assessing the natural resource use and the resource efficiency potential of the Desertec concept. Sol. Energy 2013, 87, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt-Bleek, F. Der Ökologische Rucksack. Wirtschaft für eine Zukunft mit Zukunft, 1st ed.; Hirzel: Stuttgart, Germany, 2004. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Leismann, K.; Schmitt, M.; Rohn, H.; Baedeker, C. Nutzen statt Besitzen. Auf dem Weg zu einer ressourcenschonenden Konsumkultur. In Schriften zur Ökologie, Band 27; Heinrich Böll Stiftung: Berlin, Germany, 2010. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Autio, S.; Lettenmeier, M. Ekotehokkuus—Business as Future. Yrityksen ekoteho-opas. (Eco-efficiency guide for companies. In Finnish.). In Dipoli-raportit/Dipoli-reports C, ympäristökoulutus; TKK Dipoli: Espoo, Finland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Salo, V.; Lettenmeier, M. Sähkölaite MIPS. Käyttöiän ja energiatehokkuuden vaikutus sähkölaitteiden aiheuttamaan materiaalipanokseen (MIPS of electric and electronic equipment. Influence of life-time and energy efficiency on the material input of electric and electronic equipment); Helsingin Reuse Centre: Helsinki, Finland, 2006. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
- Material Intensity Factors. Available online: http://wupperinst.org/en/info/details/wi/a/s/ad/365/ (accessed on 22 April 2013).
- Institut für Umweltkommunikation (INFU); Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie GmbH (WI); Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS); Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Projektgruppe Wissenschaftsjahr Zukunftsprojekt Erde (Eds.) Die Rohstoff-Expedition: Entdecke, was in (d)einem Handy Steckt! Lern- und Arbeitsmaterial: Bonn, Germany, 2012; Available online: http://www.die-rohstoff-expedition.de (accessed on 27 June 2014).
- Buhl, J.; Greiff, K.; Lettenmeier, M.; Liedtke, C.; Meyer, M.; Steger, S.; Teubler, J. Global Nachhaltige Materielle Wohlstandsniveaus—Analyse und Veranschaulichung Global Nachhaltiger Materieller Versorgungsgrade auf der Ebene von Haushalten; Intermediate report April 2013; Gws: Osnabrück, Germany; Wuppertal Institute: Wuppertal, Germany, 2013. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
- Ornetzeder, M.; Hertwich, E.G.; Hubacek, K.; Korytarovad, K.; Haas, W. The environmental effect of car-free housing: A case in Vienna. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 516–530. [Google Scholar]
- Talja, S.; Lettenmeier, M.; Saari, A. Luonnonvarojen Kulutus Paikallisessa Liikenteessä—Menetelmänä MIPS (Natural Resource Consumption of Local Transport according to the MIPS Concept. Finnish). Publication of the Ministry of Transport and Communications Series 14; The Ministry of Transport and Communications: Helsinki, Finland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Partanen, R.; Paloheimo, H.; Waris, H. Suomi Öljyn Jälkeen (Finland after oil); Into Kustannus: Helsinki, Finland, 2013. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
- Salo, M.; Lähteenoja, S.; Lettenmeier, M. Matkailu MIPS—Matkailun luonnonvarojen kulutus (Tourism MIPS—Consumption of natural resources by tourism); Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy Series 8; The Ministry of Employment and the Economy: Helsinki, Finland, 2008. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Share and Cite
Lettenmeier, M.; Liedtke, C.; Rohn, H. Eight Tons of Material Footprint—Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland. Resources 2014, 3, 488-515. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3030488
Lettenmeier M, Liedtke C, Rohn H. Eight Tons of Material Footprint—Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland. Resources. 2014; 3(3):488-515. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3030488
Chicago/Turabian StyleLettenmeier, Michael, Christa Liedtke, and Holger Rohn. 2014. "Eight Tons of Material Footprint—Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland" Resources 3, no. 3: 488-515. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3030488
APA StyleLettenmeier, M., Liedtke, C., & Rohn, H. (2014). Eight Tons of Material Footprint—Suggestion for a Resource Cap for Household Consumption in Finland. Resources, 3(3), 488-515. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources3030488