Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Spondias tuberosa and Spondias mombin: Nutritional Composition, Bioactive Compounds, Biological Activity and Technological Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Carbons on Metal Stabilization and the Reduction in Soil Phytotoxicity with the Assessment of Health Risks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Soybean Oil as a Green Solvent for the Recovery of Carotenoids from Banana Peel: Evaluation of the Storage and Processing on Final Product
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Chymotrypsin Purified and Biochemically Characterized from Digestive Organs of Bigfin Reef Squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana)

1
Aquatic Science and Innovative Management Division, Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agro and Bio Industry, Thaksin University, Phattalung Campus, Phattalung 93110, Thailand
3
Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
4
Division of Health and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90112, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2024, 13(5), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13050067
Submission received: 7 March 2024 / Revised: 21 April 2024 / Accepted: 9 May 2024 / Published: 14 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resource Extraction from Agricultural Products/Waste)

Abstract

:
Chymotrypsin from the digestive organs of bigfin reef squid, a major commercial squid species in Thailand, was purified to 41-fold with 5.7% yield by a sequential purification process including ammonium sulfate precipitation, size exclusion, and ion exchange chromatography. According to SDS-PAGE, the molecular weight of purified chymotrypsin was 43 kDa. Native-PAGE analysis revealed a single band for this purified enzyme. The optimum pH and temperature for chymotrypsin activity of the purified enzyme were a pH of 7.0 with a temperature of 55 °C. The purified chymotrypsin remained stable throughout a wide range of pH levels (6–11) and at relatively high temperature (55 °C). It was significantly inhibited by PMSF and TPCK. The values of the kinetic constants Km and Kcat were found to be 1.33 mM and 31.46 s−1, respectively. The purified chymotrypsin has the N-terminal amino acid IVGGQEATPGEWPWQAALQV. This study provided new information about the biochemical properties of pure chymotrypsin from bigfin reef squid, which will be useful in the future investigation, aquaculture, and application of bigfin reef squid.

1. Introduction

Cephalopods are a popular seafood worldwide. As protein accounts for approximately 70–80% of their total weight, they are a rich protein source in the human diet [1]. Various cephalopod species are farmed on an industrial scale [2], but the choice of feed for the various squid and octopus species is mainly based on research into the digestive physiology of the Mexican four-eyed octopus and the common octopus [3]. The lack of similar knowledge specific to squid species is a major obstacle to the growth of squid farming.
The bigfin reef squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana) has become a major commercial species in several countries [4]. In Thailand, S. lessoniana is found in both the Gulf of Thailand and the Andaman Sea [4]. The S. lessoniana presents great potential for aquaculture due to its popularity among consumers. Moreover, the digestive physiology of this squid has already been studied [5]. In the squid’s digestive system, several degrading enzymes exist to hydrolyze the main nutrients, but the types and functions of enzymes vary in different species. In our previous study of Sepioteuthis lessoniana, a chymotrypsin-like serine proteinase was detected in the viscera that was highly proteolytic, which could be of importance for the development of feeding strategies in bigfin reef squid farming [6]. However, more detailed information on its digestive physiology and enzyme characteristics is needed.
Chymotrypsin is a serine proteinase that cleaves peptide bonds on carbonyl groups of hydrophobic amino acid residues. Chymotrypsin is also crucial for the digestion of proteins [7]. It is synthesized in the form of chymotrypsinogen in the pancreas of vertebrates and in the digestive glands or hepatopancreas of invertebrates [7,8]. As reported previously, chymotrypsins have been extracted and biochemically characterized from the digestive organs of several species of fish and some marine invertebrates, such as the viscera of white shrimp [9], the pyloric caecum of Monterey sardine [10], and the hepatopancreas of cuttlefish [7]. To determine the potential viability of farming bigfin reef squid, we purified chymotrypsin from the digestive organs of the species and then studied the molecular and biochemical characteristics of the purified product. This information obtained could be applied for further study into the physiological and nutritional responses of bigfin reef squid and for formulating suitable artificial diets for future farming development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Sephacryl S-200 and DEAE-Sepharose were obtained from GE Healthcare Bio-Science AB (Uppsala, Sweden). All chemicals with analytical grade were acquired from Fluka Chemicals (Buchs, Switzerland).

2.2. Preparation of Squid and Crude Enzyme Extract

Fresh bigfin reef squid were acquired from the fishing port in Satun, Thailand. With a sample-to-ice ratio of 1:3 (w/w), all samples were kept in ice and delivered in less than three hours to Faculty of Agro and Bio Industry, Thaksin University, Phatthalung. The digestive organs were separated, collected, defatted [11], and prepared as a powder by powdering in a Model E8420 Waring® blender (E8420, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with cold acetone for the isolation of chymotrypsin.
The extraction of crude chymotrypsin from the powder followed the procedure developed by Poonsin et al. [12]. In brief, the defatted digestive organ powder (20 g) was suspended in starting buffer (SB) comprising 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, and 20 mM NaCl, at a 1:9 (w/v) ratio. After 30 min of continuous stirring at 4 °C, the mixture was centrifuged at 18,000× g at 4 °C for 30 min. The obtained supernatant was designated as “crude enzyme extract”.

2.3. Chymotrypsin Purification

The crude enzyme extract was precipitated with ammonium sulfate (0–40% saturation). The obtained pellets were collected, and solubilized in a small amount of SB before being dialyzed overnight with three changes of 15 volumes of SB in a dialysis bag (MW cut-off: 14,000 Da). The dialysate was then loaded for purification by size exclusion chromatography in a Sephacryl S-200 column (2.5 × 100 cm) that had been equilibrated with SB using a Minipuls 3 Gilson peristatic pump at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. Three-milliliter fractions were collected at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1 during the elution process, which was carried out with SB. Each eluted fraction was tested for protein concentration using A280 in a UV–visible spectrophotometer and chymotrypsin activity. The enzyme-active fractions were mixed and concentrated using Vivaspin Turbo 15 ultrafiltration (Goettingen, Germany). The concentrated fractions were further put onto a DEAE-Sepharose (Whatman, UK) anion exchange column (5 × 20 cm) equilibrated with SB at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1 using ÄKTA start (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Afterward, SB was used to wash the column until the A280 value was below 0.05. A linear gradient of NaCl (0.0 to 0.5 M) was used for the elution, with a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1. Three-milliliter fractions were collected and the ones with chymotrypsin activity were analyzed for enzymological characteristics. All the purification steps were performed at room temperature. The purity of chymotrypsin was determined by native-PAGE.

2.4. Chymotrypsin Activity Assay

Chymotrypsin activity was determined using the modified technique outlined by Rungruangsak-Torrissen [13]. In brief, chymotrypsin solution (200 μL) was combined with 350 μL of 0.3 mM N-succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide (SAPNA) as a substrate in 0.2 M McIlvaine’s buffer (0.1 M sodium citrate and 0.2 M sodium phosphate), pH 6.0, and the mixture was incubated for 60 min at 45 °C. To stop the reaction, 400 μL of 30% acetic acid was applied. The synthesis of p-nitroanilide was measured spectrophotometrically at 410 nm. One unit of chymotrypsin activity was expressed as 1 μmol of p-nitroanilide min−1.

2.5. Protein Concentration Measurement

The protein concentration of samples was evaluated by Lowry’s procedure with bovine serum albumin as a standard [14]. During the purification steps, the absorbance at 280 nm was applied to measure the protein concentration of eluted samples.

2.6. Determination of Optimal Activity and Stability of Chymotrypsin

2.6.1. Optimum pH and Temperature

Determination of optimal pH of chymotrypsin purified from bigfin reef squid was carried out over a pH range of 2.0–11.0 (0.2 M McIlvaine’s buffer for pH 2.0–7.5 and 0.1 M glycine-NaOH for pH 8.0–11.0) at 45 °C for 60 min and SAPNA was used as a substrate to evaluate the enzyme activity. Determination of optimal temperature of purified chymotrypsin was carried out at varying temperatures (25–80 °C) in a water bath (Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) for 60 min at pH 7.0, and the chymotrypsin activity was assessed using SAPNA as the substrate. Relative chymotrypsin activity (%) was determined by considering the maximum observed chymotrypsin activity as 100%.

2.6.2. pH and Thermal Stabilities

The stability of purified chymotrypsin was assessed by determining chymotrypsin activity after 1 h of enzyme incubation at different pH values (2.0–11.0) at ambient temperature. To study the thermal stability of purified chymotrypsin, chymotrypsin activity was examined after 1 h of enzyme incubation at temperatures ranging from 0 to 80 °C. Afterward, enzymes were cooled in iced water before determination of chymotrypsin activity. The residual chymotrypsin activity was tested by SAPNA as a substrate at pH 7.0, 55 °C, and the findings were presented as the relative activity (%) compared to the initial activity.

2.7. Determination of Inhibition against Chymotrypsin

The influences of different protease inhibitors on the inhibition of chymotrypsin activity were ascertained using the procedures outlined by Poonsin et al. [12]. Briefly, 0.1 mM 1-(L-trans-epoxysuccinyl-leucylamino)-4-guanidinobutane (E-64), 1 mM N-ethylmaleimide, 1.0 g L−1 soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI), 5 mM N-p-tosyl-L-Lys-chloromethyl ketone (TLCK), 5 mM N-tosyl-L-phechloromethyl ketone (TPCK), 0.01 mM pepstatin A, 5 mM benzamidine, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were the final concentrations of inhibitor solution that were incubated with the purified chymotrypsin. Incubation was carried out for 30 min at ambient temperature (26–28 °C), and the residual activity was evaluated using SAPNA as substrate at pH 7.0, 55 °C to calculate the percent inhibition.

2.8. Determination of Kinetics of Chymotrypsin

The activity of purified chymotrypsin from bigfin reef squid was investigated with SAPNA at final concentrations ranging from 100 to 400 mM, where the final concentration of the purified chymotrypsin was 0.1 μM. The Lineweaver and Burk [15] kinetic models were used to create various kinetic parameters, including the apparent Michaelis–Menten constant (Km), the maximum velocity (Vmax), and the catalytic efficiencies (Kcat/Km). Values of turnover number (Kcat) were also determined using the following equation: Vmax/[E] = Kcat, where [E] represents the concentration of purified chymotrypsin.

2.9. SDS-PAGE and Native-PAGE

SDS-PAGE was applied to assess the purity and molecular weight of purified chymotrypsin, as documented by Laemmli [16]. Samples were combined in a 1:1 ratio with 10% βME in sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, containing 4% SDS and 20% glycerol), and then boiled and loaded onto the gel at the protein level of 15 μg (4% stacking and 12% separating). Electrophoresis was carried out using a Mini-Protein II Cell equipment with a continuous current of 15 mA per gel. Afterward, the gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and destained as in Laemmli [16].
Native-PAGE was also performed using similar procedures for SDS-PAGE, but without heating the sample or adding SDS and reducing agents (βME) in the sample and the gel.

2.10. Molecular Weight Measurement

Using gel-filtration chromatography on a Sephacryl S-200 column, the molecular weight (MW) of purified chymotrypsin was determined. The available partition coefficient (Kav) of the chymotrypsin separated on gel-filtration chromatography was plotted against the logarithm of the MW of the protein standards to determine its MW. The elution volume (Ve) of each protein standard and chymotrypsin was determined. The elution volume of blue dextran was used to calculate the void volume (Vo) (MW 2,000,000). The standards utilized were aprotinin (MW 6500), trypsinogen (MW 24,000), bovine serum albumin (MW 66,000), and catalase (MW 232,000) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.11. Measurement of N-Terminal Amino Acid Sequence

The sequence of N-terminal amino acids of purified chymotrypsin was measured using the procedure outlined by Klomklao et al. [11]. The SDS-PAGE gel containing purified chymotrypsin band was moved to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The protein bands were excised after being stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and assessed with a Shimadzu PPSQ-33A protein sequencer (Kyoto, Japan).

2.12. Statistical Analysis

A completely randomized design was employed in this investigation. Three duplicates of the tests were conducted. Data were subjected to analysis of variance, and mean comparison was performed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test [17], and the analyses were carried out using SPSS version 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Purification of Chymotrypsin

The total and specific activity, total protein, yield, and purity of chymotrypsin from the digestive organs of bigfin reef squid are presented in Table 1. Ammonium sulfate fractionation was the first step used in the removal and separation of several proteins from a crude enzyme extract [12]. In this study, ammonium sulfate fractionation at saturations of 0–40% (w/v) obtained a chymotrypsin-specific activity at 7.7 U/mg protein. The ammonium sulfate-treated fraction was subsequently separated on Sephacryl S-200 column chromatography. Sephacryl S-200 column separated chymotrypsin from other proteins with lower molecular weight. The elution profiles of chymotrypsin using Sephacryl S-200 columns are shown in Figure 1a. After purification by the Sephacryl S-200 gel-filtration column, the obtained purity increased by 13-fold, indicating that a large number of ‘junk proteins’ were eliminated. Pooled active Sephacryl S-200 fractions were further purified using a DEAE-cellulose column. After loading and washing, the column was eluted by a 0.0–0.5 M NaCl linear gradient. A single chymotrypsin activity peak was observed (Figure 1b). After isolation by the DEAE-Sepharose anion exchange column, a large number of contaminated proteins was removed. The purity of the chymotrypsin was increased by 41-fold the purity of the crude enzyme, with a yield of 5.7% (Table 1).

3.2. Native- and SDS-PAGE

Chymotrypsin purified from the digestive organs of bigfin reef squid was estimated using native-PAGE (Figure 2a). Only one protein band was seen on the gel, demonstrating that chymotrypsin was homogeneous after the purification procedure. Previous research reported similar results on the native-PAGE gel from chymotrypsin isolated from red abalone, Haliotis rufescens [18], and cuttlefish [7].
The purified chymotrypsin analyzed using SDS-PAGE was presented in Figure 2b. The gel displayed one band with a chymotrypsin molecular weight (MW) of 43 kDa, which corresponded to the value obtained using gel-filtration chromatography on Sephacryl S-200 (Figure 3). This finding revealed that the purified chymotrypsin from bigfin reef squid digestive organs is a monomeric protein with a MW of 43 kDa. In general, chymotrypsin enzymes from aquatic animals have MWs from 22 to 35 kDa. Reported examples include MWs of 27 kDa in cod [19], 25.5 kDa in Monterey sardine [10], 31 kDa in jumbo squid [20], and 35.7 kDa in yellowleg shrimp, Penaeus californiensis [8]. The differences in molecular weight in chymotrypsins may be due to genetic variation among species [12]. However, the possibility that these differences are caused by autolytic degradation should not be excluded [12].

3.3. pH and Temperature Profiles

The purified chymotrypsin from bigfin reef squid digestive organs displayed a maximum activity at pH 7.0 (Figure 4a), which is similar to the pH of its digestive segments. At pH 6.0–8.0, relative chymotrypsin activity was still approximately 75%. As reported previously, the optimum pH values of chymotrypsin derived from marine invertebrates are in the neutral-to-alkaline range in cuttlefish and had a maximum activity at pH 8.5 [7]. Similar to the present finding, Marquez-Rios et al. [20] found an optimum pH of 7.0 for chymotrypsin from the hepatopancreas of the jumbo squid, and Bibo-Verdugo et al. [21] found an optimum pH between 7.0 and 8.0 for chymotrypsin from the viscera of the California spiny lobster. Chymotrypsin activity generally decreased at pHs higher and lower than the optimal pH. This was possibly because of the conformational changes of the enzyme under harsh conditions, resulting in the lower activity [12].
The optimal temperature profile of purified chymotrypsin is illustrated in Figure 4b. The highest chymotrypsin activity was observed at 55 °C. Above 60 °C, chymotrypsin activity rapidly declined. The purified chymotrypsin from bigfin reef squid was generally active at relatively high temperatures from 40 to 60 °C, probably because the bigfin reef squid has a habitat in relatively warm seas (around 30 °C) [11,20]. It was therefore concluded that the obtained chymotrypsin likely had an optimum conformation at relatively high temperatures. These profiles were similar to those of chymotrypsin enzymes extracted and purified from the cuttlefish [7], the scallop (Pecten maximus) [22], and the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [23]. In addition, a decrease in activity at high temperature was presumed to be the heat denaturation of the enzyme. A direct correlation was found between the temperature of the fish habitat and the optimum pH and thermal stability of fish enzymes such as trypsin and chymotrypsin [7,8,9,10,12]. Chymotrypsins from tropical fish showed higher optimum temperature and thermal stability compared with those in fish that adapted to cold environments. Temperature adaptation of enzymes is genetically determined and can involve phenotypic changes. These include differences in structure, affinity to substrates, and activation energy, as well as changes in the rate of secretion and production of isozymes, which catalyze the same reaction but with optimal efficiencies at different temperatures [24].

3.4. pH and Thermal Stabilities

As shown in Figure 4c, at pH values below five, the marked decrease in activity of the purified chymotrypsin was noticeable. But from pH 6.0 to 11.0, the enzyme was very stable with relative activities of over 80%. Thus, bigfin reef squid chymotrypsin was stable at a relatively wide pH range from weak acidic to moderate alkali conditions. Chymotrypsin derived from cuttlefish [7], jumbo squid [20], and yellowleg shrimp [8] showed similar trends of stability with regard to pH variation. In general, enzyme stability at a particular pH may be related to its net charge at that pH; a reduced stability corresponds with a net charge change that occurs below the enzyme’s pI, thus affecting its tertiary structure [23].
As shown in Figure 4d, the purified chymotrypsin was thermally stable at temperatures under 55 °C. This result is close to the thermal stability of cuttlefish, which is highly stable up to 50 °C [7]. However, the chymotrypsin quickly lost its stability above 60 °C, and was mostly inactive from 70 to 80 °C (Figure 4d), likely due to denaturation and loss of conformational structure [25]. The thermal stability profile of chymotrypsin in this study was unlike some fish-derived chymotrypsin enzymes whose stability was optimal at approximately 30 °C, and which became unstable above 55 °C [20]. The purified chymotrypsin in the present investigation remained stable at temperatures up to 55 °C. This degree of thermal stability is similar to that of chymotrypsin purified from the hepatopancreas of cuttlefish and white shrimp, which respectively showed 75% and 80% relative activity at 50 °C [13]. Navarrete-del-Toro et al. [8] found that chymotrypsin isolated from yellow shrimp showed 90% of its original activity at 50 °C. The thermal stability of enzymes is linked to the interactions that stabilize enzyme protein structures. These include hydrophobic interactions, disulfide linkages, and strong hydrophobic interactions within protein structures [12].

3.5. Influence of Protease Inhibitors

The influence of a variety of inhibitors of protease on bigfin reef squid chymotrypsin is described in Table 2. The purified enzyme was greatly inhibited by PMSF (9.05% relative activity), a serine proteinase inhibitor, and TPCK (27.59% relative activity), a specific chymotrypsin inhibitor. SBTI, a serine proteinase inhibitor, exhibited minimal inhibition against the purified chymotrypsin, which retained 89.23% of its original activity. Other studied inhibitors that are effective against cysteine (E-64), metallo (EDTA), and aspartic (pepstatin A) proteinases and trypsin (TLCK), barely inhibited our purified chymotrypsin. The findings of this study were similar to the findings of a study of chymotrypsin isolated from jumbo squid [20], which was strongly inhibited by TPCK (6% of original activity) and PMSF (0% of original activity). Moreover, Balti et al. [7] found that chymotrypsin obtained from the hepatopancreas of cuttlefish was fully inactivated by PMSF and SBTI. The inhibition study indicated that the purified enzyme was chymotrypsin.

3.6. Kinetics Studies

Using Lineveaver–Burk plots (Figure 5), the kinetic constants (Km and Kcat) of the bigfin reef squid chymotrypsin were measured. The Km, Kcat, and catalytic efficiency (Kcat/Km) of purified chymotrypsin were 1.33 mM, 31.46 s−1, and 23.65 s−1 mM−1, respectively. The Km is associated with the catalytic power of an enzyme. This reflects the affinity for the substrate. Each enzyme has a characteristic Km for a given substrate [11,12]. The Km value of the studied chymotrypsin was lower than that of chymotrypsin from the whiteleg shrimp, which was 1.6 mM [9], suggesting that bigfin reef squid chymotrypsin had a higher affinity to SAPNA. Kcat is another essential parameter determining an enzyme’s efficiency. The Kcat value of the studied chymotrypsin was higher than the Kcat values of chymotrypsin isolated from cattle (Bos taurus), which was 26.0 s−1 [26], indicating a higher rate of substrate hydrolysis. The catalytic efficiency (Kcat/Km) of the studied chymotrypsin showed a higher value than chymotrypsin from the carp, Cyprinus carpio (0.0146 s−1 μM−1) [27] and whiteleg shrimp (9.68 s−1 mM−1) [9]. The results suggest that chymotrypsin from bigfin reef squid digestive organs is more efficient in catalysis than some of its counterparts.

3.7. N-Terminal Amino Acid Sequence

Figure 6 illustrates the twenty amino acid sequences on the N-terminal of the purified chymotrypsin from the bigfin reef squid digestive organ and a comparison with the N-terminal sequences of chymotrypsin enzymes from other species. The N-terminal sequence of the purified chymotrypsin was IVGGQEATPGEWPWQAALQV. According to the comparison, amino acid residues such as I1, V2, G4, A7, Q15, and L18 were found in all samples of purified chymotrypsin (Figure 6). The studied chymotrypsin exhibited high similarity to cuttlefish chymotrypsin [7]. There was a difference of only two amino acid residues between the two enzymes. Chymotrypsin from white shrimp [28] and kuruma shrimp [29] exhibited moderate similarity (six different residues) with the proposed chymotrypsin.
According to the research, the major enzyme found in the digestive organs of bigfin reef squid is chymotrypsin. Like mammalian chymotrypsins, bigfin reef squid chymotrypsin is an endopeptidase that breaks down proteins by cleaving the peptide bond on the carboxyl side of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan. Therefore, artificial diets for bigfin reef squid could include ingredients that contain high amounts of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan.

4. Conclusions

A novel chymotrypsin was isolated to homogeneity from bigfin reef squid digestive organs, with an optimal temperature of 55 °C and pH of 7.0., and with PMSF and TPCK strongly inhibiting the purified chymotrypsin. The kinetics parameters Km, Kcat, and Kcat/Km were 1.33 mM, 31.46 s−1, and 23.65 s−1 mM−1, respectively. Its N-terminal amino acid sequence was IVGGQEATPGEWPWQAALQV, which displayed a high homology with cuttlefish chymotrypsin. This first report on the isolation and biochemical characteristics of chymotrypsin from the bigfin reef squid produced useful findings that could inform research into the physiological and nutritional responses of the species for future farming development and have potential applications in the food industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K. and K.T.; methodology, J.S. and S.K.; software, Y.Z.; validation, S.K., Y.Z. and K.T.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.; writing—review and editing, S.K., Y.Z. and K.T.; supervision, S.K. and K.T.; funding acquisition, J.S., S.K. and K.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Thailand Research Fund under the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program to Jirapan Satjarak, Grant Number: PHD/0038/2559. This work was also supported by the National Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation Policy Council, Thaksin University (Research project grant) Fiscal Year 2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal protocols, including sampling, euthanasia, and organ collection, were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Prince of Songkla University (Project Code 2564-01-075; date of approval 2 November 2022).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of the Food Chemistry Laboratory at the Faculty of Agro and Bio Industry, Thaksin University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lee, P.G.; Turk, P.E.; Yang, W.T.; Hanlon, R.T. Biological characteristics and biomedical applications of the squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana cultured through multiple generations. Biol. Bull. 1994, 186, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ibarra-García, L.E.; Tovar-Romírez, D.; Rosas, C.; Campa-Córdova, Á.I.; Mazón-Suástegui, J.M. Digestive enzymes of the California two-spot octopus, Octopus bimaculoides (Pickford and McConnaughey, 1994). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 215, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bastos, P.; Fracalossi, D.M.; Chimal, M.E.; Sánchez, A.; Rosas, C. Digestive enzymes and timing of digestion in Octopus vulgaris type II. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 16, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jivaluk, J.; Nabhitabhata, J.; Nateewathana, A.; Watprasit, P. Description of Thai type of bigfin reef squid, Sepioteuthis lessoniana, hatchling with note on comparison to Japanese types. Phuket Mar. Biol. Cent. Res. Bull. 2005, 66, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
  5. Semmens, J.M. Changes in the digestive gland of the loliginid squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana (Lesson 1830) associated with feeding. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 2002, 274, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Satjarak, J.; Klomklao, S.; Suanyuk, N.; Thongprajukaew, K. Biochemical characterization of protein-digesting enzymes from viscera of bigfin reef squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana) and implications for in vitro protein digestibility. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2023, 57, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Balti, R.; Bougherra, F.; Bougatef, A.; Hayet, B.K.; Nedjar-Arroume, N.; Dhulster, P.; Guillochon, D.; Nasri, M. Chymotrypsin from the hepatopancreas of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) with high activity in the hydrolysis of long chain peptide substrates: Purification and biochemical characterization. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Navarrete-del-Toro, M.A.; García-Carreño, F.L.; Hernández-Cortés, P.; Molnár, T.; Gráf, L. Biochemical characterisation of chymotrypsin from the midgut gland of yellowleg shrimp, Penaeus californiensis. Food Chem. 2015, 173, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hernández-Cortés, P.; Whitaker, J.R.; García-Carreño, F.L. Purification and characterization of chymotrypsin from Penaeus vannamei (Crustacea: Decapoda). J. Food Biochem. 1997, 21, 497–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castillo-Yañez, F.J.; Pacheco-Aguilar, R.; Lugo-Sanchez, M.E.; Garcia-Sanchez, G.; Quintero-Reyes, I.E. Biochemical characterization of an isoform of chymotrypsin from the viscera of Monterey sardine (Sardinops sagax caerulea), and comparison with bovine chymotrypsin. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 634–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Klomklao, S.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W.; Kishimura, H.; Simpson, B.K.; Saeki, H. Trypsins from yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albocores) spleen: Purification and characterization. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 144, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Poonsin, T.; Simpson, B.K.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W.; Yoshida, A.; Osatomi, K.; Klomklao, S. Anionic trypsin from the spleen of albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga): Purification, biochemical properties and its application for proteolytic degradation of fish muscle. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rungruangsak-Torrissen, K.; Moss, R.; Andresen, L.H.; Berg, A.; Waagbø, R. Different expressions of trypsin and chymotrypsin in relation to growth in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 32, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lineweaver, H.; Burk, D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1934, 56, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Steel, R.G.D.; Torrie, J.H. Principle and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  18. Groppe, J.C.; Morse, D.E. Molluscan chymotrypsin-like protease; structure, localization and substrate specificity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1993, 305, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Leth-Larsen, R.; Ásgeirsson, B.; Thórólfsson, M.; Nørregaard-Madsen, M.; Højrup, P. Structure of chymotrypsin variant B from Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1297, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Marquez-Rios, E.; Coto-Arriola, O.; Villalba-Villalba, A.G.; Ezquerra-Brauer, J.M.; Ocaño-Higuera, V.M.; Lopez-Corona, B.E.; Torres-Arreola, W. Chymotrypsin isolation from jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) hepatopancreas: Partial characterization and effect on muscle collagen. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bibo-Verdugo, B.; Rogo-Arreola, L.; Navarrete-del-Toro, M.A.; García-Carreño, F. A chymotrypsin from the digestive tract of California spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus: Purification and biochemical characterization. Mar. Biotechnol. 2015, 17, 416–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Le Chevalier, P.; Sellos, D.; Van Wormhoudt, A. Purification and partial characterization of chymotrypsin-like proteases from the digestive gland of the scallop Pecten maximus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995, 110, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kristjánsson, M.M.; Nielsen, H.H. Purification and characterization of two chymotrypsin-like proteases from the pyloric caeca of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1992, 101, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Volkloff, H.; Ronnestad, I. Effects of temperature on feedinf and digestive processes in fish. Temperature 2020, 7, 307–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Poonsin, T.; Simpson, B.K.; Visessanguan, W.; Yoshida, A.; Klomklao, S. Optimal immobilization of trypsin from the spleen of albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga) and its characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 143, 462–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. DelMar, E.G.; Largman, C.; Brodrick, J.W.; Geokas, M.C. A sensitive new substrate for chymotrypsin. Anal. Biochem. 1979, 99, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cohen, T.; Gertler, A.; Birk, Y. Pancreatic proteolytic enzymes from carp (Cyprinus carpio) I. purification and physical properties of trypsin, chymotrypsin, elastase and carboxypeptidase B. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1981, 69, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sellos, D.; Van Wormhoudt, A. Molecular cloning of a cDNA that encodes a serine protease with chymotryptic and collagenolytic activities in the hepatopancreas of the shrimp Penaeus vannamei (Crustacea, Decapoda). FEBS Lett. 1992, 309, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Danwattananusorn, T.; Kondo, H.; Aoki, T.; Hirono, I. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of a chymotrypsin-like serine protease from kuruma shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicas. Fish Sci. 2009, 75, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiang, Y.K.; Sun, L.C.; Cai, Q.F.; Liu, G.M.; Yoshida, A.; Osatomi, K.; Cao, M.J. Biochemical characterization of chymotrypsins from the hepatopancreas of Japanese sea bass (Lateolabrax japonicus). J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2010, 58, 8069–8076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Suzuki, T.; Srivastava, A.S.; Kurokawa, T. cDNA cloning and phylogenetic analysis of pancreatic serine proteases from Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 131, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lo, M.J.; Weng, C.F. Developmental regulation of gastric pepsin and pancreatic serine protease in larvae of the euryhaline teleost, Oreochromis mossambicus. Aquaculture 2006, 261, 1403–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Purification of chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid. Chymotrypsin elution profiles on Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration (a) and DEAE-Sepharose anion exchange columns (b). Pooled fractions were shown as “---“.
Figure 1. Purification of chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid. Chymotrypsin elution profiles on Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration (a) and DEAE-Sepharose anion exchange columns (b). Pooled fractions were shown as “---“.
Resources 13 00067 g001
Figure 2. Native-PAGE (a) and SDS-PAGE (b) of purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid. Lane M, molecular weight standard; lane 1, purified chymotrypsin; O, top of separating gel; TD, tracking dye.
Figure 2. Native-PAGE (a) and SDS-PAGE (b) of purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid. Lane M, molecular weight standard; lane 1, purified chymotrypsin; O, top of separating gel; TD, tracking dye.
Resources 13 00067 g002
Figure 3. Calibration curve for the molecular weight determination of the purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid on Sephacryl S-200 chromatography.
Figure 3. Calibration curve for the molecular weight determination of the purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid on Sephacryl S-200 chromatography.
Resources 13 00067 g003
Figure 4. pH (a) and temperature profiles (b) and pH (c) and thermal stabilities (d) of purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid. Bars represent the standard deviation from triplicate determinations.
Figure 4. pH (a) and temperature profiles (b) and pH (c) and thermal stabilities (d) of purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid. Bars represent the standard deviation from triplicate determinations.
Resources 13 00067 g004
Figure 5. The Lineweaver and Burk plot of purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid.
Figure 5. The Lineweaver and Burk plot of purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid.
Resources 13 00067 g005
Figure 6. Alignment of the N-terminal amino acid sequences of chymotrypsin purified from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid and compared with alignments from chymotrypsin enzymes from cuttlefish [7], abalone [18], white shrimp [28], kuruma shrimp [29], Atlantic cod [19], Japanese sea bass [30], Japanese flounder [31], zebrafish (GenBank BC078367), and Mozambique tilapia [32].
Figure 6. Alignment of the N-terminal amino acid sequences of chymotrypsin purified from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid and compared with alignments from chymotrypsin enzymes from cuttlefish [7], abalone [18], white shrimp [28], kuruma shrimp [29], Atlantic cod [19], Japanese sea bass [30], Japanese flounder [31], zebrafish (GenBank BC078367), and Mozambique tilapia [32].
Resources 13 00067 g006
Table 1. Purification profile of chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid.
Table 1. Purification profile of chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid.
Purification StepTotal Activity (U)Total Protein
(mg)
Specific Activity
(U/mg)
Yield
(%)
Purity
(fold)
Crude enzyme extract194212981.51001
Ammonium sulfate precipitation
(0–40% w/v)
13051707.7675
Sephacryl S-20073338193813
DEAE-Sepharose 1111.8625.741
Table 2. Influence of proteinase inhibitors on the activity of purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid.
Table 2. Influence of proteinase inhibitors on the activity of purified chymotrypsin from digestive organs of bigfin reef squid.
InhibitorsConcentrationRemaining Activity (%) *
Control 100.00 ± 1.60 e
E-640.1 mM98.60 ± 0.15 e
N-ethylmaleimide1 mM97.56 ± 1.80 de
Soybean trypsin inhibitor1.0 g/L89.23 ± 3.70 c
TLCK5 mM97.49 ± 0.50 de
TPCK5 mM27.59 ± 0.28 b
Benzamidine5 mM98.60 ± 0.80 e
PMSF1 mM9.05 ± 0.98 a
Pepstatin A0.01 mM94.99 ± 1.19 d
EDTA2 mM98.83 ± 0.88 e
Different letters in the same column denote significant differences (p < 0.05). * Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Satjarak, J.; Klomklao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Thongprajukaew, K. Novel Chymotrypsin Purified and Biochemically Characterized from Digestive Organs of Bigfin Reef Squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana). Resources 2024, 13, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13050067

AMA Style

Satjarak J, Klomklao S, Zhang Y, Thongprajukaew K. Novel Chymotrypsin Purified and Biochemically Characterized from Digestive Organs of Bigfin Reef Squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana). Resources. 2024; 13(5):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13050067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Satjarak, Jirapan, Sappasith Klomklao, Yi Zhang, and Karun Thongprajukaew. 2024. "Novel Chymotrypsin Purified and Biochemically Characterized from Digestive Organs of Bigfin Reef Squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana)" Resources 13, no. 5: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13050067

APA Style

Satjarak, J., Klomklao, S., Zhang, Y., & Thongprajukaew, K. (2024). Novel Chymotrypsin Purified and Biochemically Characterized from Digestive Organs of Bigfin Reef Squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana). Resources, 13(5), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13050067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop