Next Article in Journal
A New Multiteam System (MTS) Effectiveness Model
Previous Article in Journal
Applying Control Abstraction to the Design of Human–Agent Teams
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Governance Perspective for System-of-Systems

A Method for Measuring Systems Thinking Learning

School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, 204 Rogers Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Science and Math Investigative Learning Experiences (SMILE) Program, Oregon State University, 18 Gladys Valley Center, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2020, 8(2), 11;
Received: 6 February 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 17 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Systems Sciences 2018)
The myriad of problems facing the world today are increasingly complex, dynamic, and transcend multiple domains. This necessitates the need for trans-disciplinary approaches capable of providing a framework to help solve these problems. Systems thinking provides the skills necessary for people to approach these types of problems. However, a lack of awareness and understanding of systems thinking hinders a potential systems-literate and systems-capable society. Systems thinking is comprised of four underlying concepts or skills: distinction-making, organizing systems, inter-relating, and perspective-taking. The path to becoming a systems thinker follows a process comprised of three levels—sensibility (awareness of systems), literacy (knowledge of systems), and capability (understanding of systems)—repeated across multiple learning phases. During this research study, a method was defined to measure whether non-experts learned the underlying systems thinking concepts according to this learning process. An experiment was conducted with 97 middle and high school students who were asked to draw a fish-tank system before and after being taught to apply the systems thinking concepts as skills for identifying elements, interactions, and roles/purposes. The results provide evidence to conclude that student learning of systems thinking significantly increased from the first drawing to the second drawing. View Full-Text
Keywords: systems thinking; systems education; systems skills; systems sensibility; systems literacy systems thinking; systems education; systems skills; systems sensibility; systems literacy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Taylor, S.; Calvo-Amodio, J.; Well, J. A Method for Measuring Systems Thinking Learning. Systems 2020, 8, 11.

AMA Style

Taylor S, Calvo-Amodio J, Well J. A Method for Measuring Systems Thinking Learning. Systems. 2020; 8(2):11.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taylor, Seth, Javier Calvo-Amodio, and Jay Well. 2020. "A Method for Measuring Systems Thinking Learning" Systems 8, no. 2: 11.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop