Next Article in Journal
On the Isomorphism between Dissipative Systems, Fractal Self-Similarity and Electrodynamics. Toward an Integrated Vision of Nature
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring and Explaining Complex Allometric Relationships: A Case Study on Amniote Testes Mass Allometry
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Allometric Relations and Scaling Laws for the Cardiovascular System of Mammals
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Systems 2014, 2(2), 186-202;

A Sceptics View: “Kleiber’s Law” or the “3/4 Rule” is neither a Law nor a Rule but Rather an Empirical Approximation

Metabolic Research Centre & School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Received: 24 February 2014 / Revised: 18 April 2014 / Accepted: 23 April 2014 / Published: 28 April 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Allometric Scaling)
Full-Text   |   PDF [494 KB, uploaded 28 April 2014]


Early studies showed the metabolic rate (MR) of different-sized animals was not directly related to body mass. The initial explanation of this difference, the “surface law”, was replaced by the suggestion that MR be expressed relative to massn, where the scaling exponent “n” be empirically determined. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) conditions were developed and BMR became important clinically, especially concerning thyroid diseases. Allometry, the technique previously used to empirically analyse relative growth, showed BMR of endotherms varied with 0.73–0.74 power of body mass. Kleiber suggested that mass3/4 be used, partly because of its easy calculation with a slide rule. Later studies have produced a range of BMR scaling exponents, depending on species measured. Measurement of maximal metabolism produced scaling exponents ranging from 0.80 to 0.97, while scaling of mammalian MR during growth display multi-phasic allometric relationships with scaling exponents >3/4 initially, followed by scaling exponents <3/4. There is no universal metabolic scaling exponent. The fact that “allometry” is an empirical technique to analyse relative change and not a biological law is discussed. Relative tissue size is an important determinant of MR. There is also a need to avoid simplistic assumptions regarding the allometry of surface area. View Full-Text
Keywords: allometry; basal metabolic rate; maximal metabolic rate; relative growth allometry; basal metabolic rate; maximal metabolic rate; relative growth
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hulbert, A.J. A Sceptics View: “Kleiber’s Law” or the “3/4 Rule” is neither a Law nor a Rule but Rather an Empirical Approximation. Systems 2014, 2, 186-202.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Systems EISSN 2079-8954 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top