This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Dynamic Financing and Subsidy Allowances in Low-Carbon Supply Chains Under Consumption Preference Updating
by
Mingyun Gao
Mingyun Gao 1,
Qinzi Xiao
Qinzi Xiao 2,*,
Ruiping Wu
Ruiping Wu 1 and
Lixin Xia
Lixin Xia 1
1
School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2
School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2026, 14(6), 649; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060649 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 21 March 2026
/
Revised: 27 May 2026
/
Accepted: 31 May 2026
/
Published: 5 June 2026
Abstract
Growing awareness of low-carbon environmental protection necessitates incorporating the dynamic evolution of consumer preferences into supply chain management. Unlike prior research focusing on single financing or static preferences, this paper uniquely integrates financing choice under mixed-financing conditions and government incentives under dynamic information updating. We investigate a low-carbon supply chain where a capital-constrained retailer combines low-carbon credit financing (LCF) and trade credit financing (TCF) and under the updating of consumption preferences during the lead time, and build a carbon reduction optimization model. The manufacturer’s abatement and production, the retailer’s financing balancing LCF and TCF under bankruptcy risk, and ordering are modeled within a two-period newsvendor framework with demand information updating. Result analysis reveals the following: (i) Under preference updating and equal subsidy amounts, LCF consistently induces higher carbon reduction efficiency than promotion allowances. (ii) Counterintuitively, promotion allowances dynamically enhance the supply chain’s total profit more effectively than LCF, exposing a critical divergence between environmental efficiency and economic performance. (iii) Across all incentive schemes (single or combined), the marginal gain in carbon reduction efficiency declines with increasing subsidy intensity. These findings imply that policymakers should flexibly align the choice of incentive instrument with the prioritized objective—carbon reduction or supply chain profitability—given the diminishing marginal returns.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Gao, M.; Xiao, Q.; Wu, R.; Xia, L.
Dynamic Financing and Subsidy Allowances in Low-Carbon Supply Chains Under Consumption Preference Updating. Systems 2026, 14, 649.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060649
AMA Style
Gao M, Xiao Q, Wu R, Xia L.
Dynamic Financing and Subsidy Allowances in Low-Carbon Supply Chains Under Consumption Preference Updating. Systems. 2026; 14(6):649.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060649
Chicago/Turabian Style
Gao, Mingyun, Qinzi Xiao, Ruiping Wu, and Lixin Xia.
2026. "Dynamic Financing and Subsidy Allowances in Low-Carbon Supply Chains Under Consumption Preference Updating" Systems 14, no. 6: 649.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060649
APA Style
Gao, M., Xiao, Q., Wu, R., & Xia, L.
(2026). Dynamic Financing and Subsidy Allowances in Low-Carbon Supply Chains Under Consumption Preference Updating. Systems, 14(6), 649.
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060649
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.