Previous Article in Journal
Designing Human–AI Collaboration for Hybrid Intelligence in Immersive Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Workforce Competencies in Data-Driven Decision-Making for Supply Chain Resilience Under Uncertainty
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis Approach for Group Decision-Making Under Heterogeneous Information Conditions

by
Yu-Dian Lai
and
Kuei-Hu Chang
*
Department of Management Sciences, R.O.C. Military Academy, Kaohsiung 830, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2026, 14(6), 640; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060640
Submission received: 6 May 2026 / Revised: 29 May 2026 / Accepted: 2 June 2026 / Published: 3 June 2026

Abstract

A central challenge in complex group decision-making is how to integrate heterogeneous types of information. Experts differ in background and experience, which leads to variation in their understanding of assessment attributes and in the forms of information they provide. Such information may include fuzzy semantic information, fuzzy semantic interval information, and uncertain information, increasing the complexity of the decision process. Traditional approaches commonly employ fuzzy set (FS) and intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) models to address group decision-making problems involving human cognitive judgments. These models constrain the sum of the membership degree (MD) and the non-membership degree (non-MD) to be equal to 1 and less than or equal to 1, respectively. However, when assessment information is insufficient, the MD and non-membership degree provided by experts may exceed this constraint. In addition, the score function (SF) and accuracy function (AF) used in FS and IFS do not account for indeterminacy, making them unsuitable for handling incomplete and hesitation information. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a Pythagorean fuzzy stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis-based method and introduces a new score function (NSF) and a new accuracy function (NAF) within the Pythagorean fuzzy set framework for complex group decision-making. An illustrative case on raw material vendor selection for shipbuilding enterprises is used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results demonstrate that the method produces more reasonable and accurate vendor ranking outcomes.
Keywords: group decision-making; Pythagorean fuzzy set; stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis; intuitionistic fuzzy set; artificial intelligence group decision-making; Pythagorean fuzzy set; stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis; intuitionistic fuzzy set; artificial intelligence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lai, Y.-D.; Chang, K.-H. A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis Approach for Group Decision-Making Under Heterogeneous Information Conditions. Systems 2026, 14, 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060640

AMA Style

Lai Y-D, Chang K-H. A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis Approach for Group Decision-Making Under Heterogeneous Information Conditions. Systems. 2026; 14(6):640. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060640

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lai, Yu-Dian, and Kuei-Hu Chang. 2026. "A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis Approach for Group Decision-Making Under Heterogeneous Information Conditions" Systems 14, no. 6: 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060640

APA Style

Lai, Y.-D., & Chang, K.-H. (2026). A Novel Pythagorean Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis Approach for Group Decision-Making Under Heterogeneous Information Conditions. Systems, 14(6), 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14060640

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop