Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Eco-Packaging? Insights from LDA and Conjoint Analysis: Evidence from Republic of Korea
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Theory
2.1. Literature on Consumer Perspectives on Eco-Packaging
2.2. LDA Topic Modeling
2.3. Conjoint Analysis
3. Methods
4. Data Analysis
5. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Topic Title | Keywords | |||||||||
| Carbon neutrality of Product | Topic 1 | Expert | Start-up | Carbon neutral | Job | Automobile | Product | Vice-Chairman | User | Seoul city |
| Reusable ice pack, buffer material | Topic 2 | Ten thousand | Minimization | Company | Reuse | Ice pack | EV | Contents | Gift set | Buffer material |
| Minimization of disposable use | Topic 3 | Disposable | Governance | Tumbler | Carbon dioxide | CJ | China | Vegan | Minimization | Eco |
| Zero waste | Topic 4 | Pollution | COVID-19 | Solar energy | Company | Department store | First half | Meanwhile | Gift set | Tumbler |
| Minimization of Pet | Topic 5 | Job | Pollution | Environment | COVID-19 | Pet | Minimization | Homepage | Sustainable | Seafood |
| Waste plastic upcycling | Topic 6 | China | Waste plastic | Gift set | Upcycling | Carbon dioxide | Samsung Electronics | Japan | Disabled person | Ten thousand |
| Minimization of polyethylene | Topic 7 | Republic of Korea | Eco | Minimization | Ice pack | Gyeonggi-do | Ingredients | Polyethylene | Start-up | Contents |
| Sustainable buffer material | Topic 8 | Republic of Korea | Sustainable | Buffer materials | COVID-19 | Minimization | Villager | Jeonnam | Product | Citizen |
| Label-free | Topic 9 | Distribution | Label-free | Fresh | Samsung Electronics | Distribution industry | Meanwhile | Customer | Sustainable | Pollution |
| Separate discharge of buffer material and waste plastic | Topic 10 | Buffer material | CJ Logistics | Carbon dioxide | Automobile | Waste plastic | Microbe | COVID-19 | Ten thousand | Separate waste collection |
| Eco ice pack | Topic 11 | Gift set | Ice pack | Europe | Jeonnam-city | China | Microbe | COVID-19 | Utilization | Sales volume |
| Minimization of buffer material | Topic 12 | Minimization | Ice pack | Job | Micro enterprise | Buffer material | Off-line | New-deal | Affiliate | Coronavirus |
| Topic | “Reusable ice pack, buffer material (Topic 2),” “Label-free (Topic 9),” “Separate discharge of buffer material and waste plastic (Topic 10)” | “Minimization of polyethylene (Topic 7)” | “Sustainable buffering materials (Topic 8),” “Minimization of polyethylene (Topic 7)” | “Minimization of buffer material (Topic 12),” “Minimization of disposable use (Topic 3)” |
| Keyword using CAGR | “Convenience” | “Reusable container,” “Eco-bag,” “Paper,” “Corrugated cardboard,” “Polypropylene” | “Paper,” “Plastic,” “Corrugated cardboard” | “Overpackaging,” “Each piece” |
| Four themes related to eco-friendly packaging | Topics related to ease of reuse/use | Topics related to eco-friendly products used for outer packaging | Topics related to eco-friendly products used for inner packaging | Topics related to form of packaging |
| Packaging process | Packaging attached to the product | Outer packaging for delivery | Inner packaging for delivery | Form of packaging |
| Ease of Recycling | Packaging Material | Tape | Buffer Material | Ice Pack | Form of Packaging | Delivery Speed | Price | |
| 1 | High | Reusable eco-bag | Paper tape | Plastic | Gel-type | Individual | Same-day | KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) |
| 2 | Low | Reusable eco-bag | Transparent box tape | Vinyl bubble wrap | Gel-type | Individual | Same-day | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30) |
| 3 | High | Paper | Paper tape | Vinyl bubble wrap | Gel-type | Individual | Next-day | KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) |
| 4 | Medium | Paper | Transparent box tape | Plastic | Gel-type | Individual | More than 2 days | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30) |
| 5 | Low | Paper | Transparent box tape | Paper | Water-type | Individual | Same-day | KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) |
| 6 | Medium | Reusable eco-bag | Paper tape | Vinyl bubble wrap | Water-type | Bundle | Same-day | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30) |
| 7 | Low | Paper | Paper tape | Plastic | Water-type | Bundle | Next-day | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30) |
| 8 | Low | Reusable eco-bag | Paper tape | Paper | Gel-type | Bundle | More than two days | KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) |
| 9 | High | Reusable eco-bag | Transparent box tape | Paper | Gel-type | Bundle | Next-day | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30) |
| 10 | High | Paper | Transparent box tape | Vinyl bubble wrap | Water-type | Bundle | More than two days | KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) |
| 11 | High | Paper | Transparent box tape | Paper | Gel-type | Bundle | Same-day | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30) |
| 12 | High | Paper | Paper tape | Paper | Water-type | Individual | Same-day | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30) |
| 13 | Medium | Paper | Paper tape | Paper | Gel-type | Bundle | Same-day | KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) |
| 14 | Medium | Reusable eco-bag | Transparent box tape | Paper | Water-type | Individual | Next-day | KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) |
| 15 | High | Reusable eco-bag | Transparent box tape | Plastic | Water-type | Bundle | Same-day | KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) |
| 16 | High | Reusable eco-bag | Paper tape | Paper | Water-type | Individual | More than 2 days | KRW 3000 (USD2.30) |

References
- Beckers, J.; Weekx, S.; Beutels, P.; Verhetsel, A. COVID-19 and retail: The catalyst for e-commerce in Belgium? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 62, 102645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kim, M.; Im, S.; Choi, D. Competitiveness of E Commerce firms through ESG logistics. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savelsbergh, M.; Van Woensel, T. 50th Anniversary Invited Article—City Logistics: Challenges and Opportunities. Transp. Sci. 2016, 50, 363–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unctad, E. (Ed.) The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2021, 23rd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.; Peterle, E. The E-Commerce Market in South Korea; Nowak & Partner: Warsaw, Poland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.; Shu, E.; Ye, D.; Zhou, S.; Sun, H. Study on green packaging diffusion in logistics enterprise clusters based on complex network evolutionary game. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 499, 145166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Niu, S.; Wang, Y.; Sima, H. Does atypical packaging design enhance the appeal of healthy food? Evidence from multiple experiments. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2025, 87, 104458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabbour, C.J.C.; Seuring, S.; de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Jugend, D.; Fiorini, P.D.C.; Latan, H.; Izeppi, W.C. Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 264, 110416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orzan, G.; Cruceru, A.F.; Bălăceanu, C.T.; Chivu, R.G. Consumers’ behavior concerning sustainable packaging: An exploratory study on Romanian consumers. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, P.E.; Rao, V.R. Conjoint measurement-for quantifying judgmental data. J. Mark. Res. 1971, 8, 355–363. [Google Scholar]
- Green, P.E.; Srinivasan, V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J. Consum. Res. 1978, 5, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinho, G.; Pires, A.; Portela, G.; Fonseca, M. Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 103, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, R.; Xu, X.; Li, Z.; Bai, Q. Reusable packaging adoption in e-commerce markets with green consumers: An evolutionary game analysis. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 81, 103818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koenig-Lewis, N.; Palmer, A.; Dermody, J.; Urbye, A. Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging–Rational and emotional approaches. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014, 37, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, H.; Sha, Y.; Ji, H.; Fan, J. What affect consumers’ willingness to pay for green packaging? Evidence from China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Cai, L.; Yuen, K.F.; Wang, X. Exploring consumers’ usage intention of reusable express packaging: An extended norm activation model. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 72, 103265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, S.; Ahn, H.K.; Jeong, J.; Moon, J. Consumers’ attitude toward sustainable food products: Ingredients vs. Packaging. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, G.; Pathak, P. Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: A study on developing nation. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 141, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cronin, J.J., Jr.; Smith, J.S.; Gleim, M.R.; Ramirez, E.; Martinez, J.D. Green marketing strategies: An examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2011, 39, 158–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rokka, J.; Uusitalo, L. Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices–do consumers care? Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2008, 32, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Birgelen, M.; Semeijn, J.; Keicher, M. Packaging and proenvironmental consumption behavior: Investigating purchase and disposal decisions for beverages. Environ. Behav. 2009, 41, 125–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magnier, L.; Crié, D. Communicating packaging eco-friendliness: An exploration of consumers’ perceptions of eco-designed packaging. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2015, 43, 350–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Cai, L.; Gong, X.; Li, X.; Yang, M.; Long, R. Enhancing acceptance of reusable express packaging: A mixed-method study to reveal the net effects and configurational effects of consumers’ perceptions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2025, 87, 104438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SHARMA, V.K.; BABEL, R. Eco-friendly packaging and consumer buying behaviour in india a case study of mumbai. J. Adv. Sci. 2002, 13, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popovic, I.; Bossink, B.A.G.; van der Sijde, P.C.; Fong, C.Y.M. Why are consumers willing to pay more for liquid foods in environmentally friendly packaging? Sustainability 2020, 12, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delen, D.; Crossland, M.D. Seeding the survey and analysis of research literature with text mining. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 34, 1707–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.; Tamakloe, R.; Lee, G.; Park, D. Insight from scientific study in logistics using text mining. Transp. Res. Rec. 2019, 2673, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blei, D.M. Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 2012, 55, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blei, D.M.; Ng, A.Y.; Jordan, M.I. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3, 993–1022. [Google Scholar]
- Song, B.; Suh, Y. Identifying convergence fields and technologies for industrial safety: LDA-based network analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 138, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.S.; Han, E.J.; Sohn, S.Y. Predicting the pattern of technology convergence using big-data technology on large-scale triadic patents. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2015, 100, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detthamrong, U.; Nguyen, L.T.; Jaroenruen, Y.; Takhom, A.; Chaichuay, V.; Chotchantarakun, K.; Chansanam, W. Topic Modeling Analytics of Digital Economy Research: Trends and Insights. J. Scientometr. Res. 2024, 13, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Mengoni, P. How pandemic spread in news: Text analysis using topic model. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), Melbourne, Australia, 14–17 December 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 764–770. [Google Scholar]
- Park, H.J.; Cho, S.G.; Lee, K.W.; Lee, S.J.; Oh, J. Topic Modeling Analysis of Children’s Food Safety Management Using BigKinds News Big Data: Comparing the Implementation Times of the Comprehensive Plan for Children’s Dietary Safety Management. Foods 2025, 14, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Yang, Y.; Tso, G.K.; Li, Y. Analysis of launch strategy in cross-border e-Commerce market via topic modeling of consumer reviews. Electron. Commer. Res. 2019, 19, 863–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kojcic, I.; Kuzmanovic, M. Conjoint Analysis of Green Consumer Preferences for Electronic Products. Int. J. Qual. Res. 2022, 16, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Branca, G.; Resciniti, R.; Loureiro, S.M.C. Virtual is so real! Consumers’ evaluation of product packaging in virtual reality. Psychol. Mark. 2023, 40, 596–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, J.L. What is field theory? Am. J. Sociol. 2003, 109, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkowitsch, N.A.; Scheibehenne, B.; Rieskamp, J. Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models. J. Exp. Psychol. 2014, 143, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Busemeyer, J.R.; Townsend, J.T. Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychol. Rev. 1993, 100, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meyerding, S.G.; Bauchrowitz, A.; Lehberger, M. Consumer preferences for beer attributes in Germany: A conjoint and latent class approach. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 47, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gawor, T.; Hoberg, K. Customers’ valuation of time and convenience in e-fulfillment. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2019, 49, 75–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.; Rahman, A.; Karim, M.R.; Khan, M.S.I.; Islam, M.J. Normalized approach to find optimal number of topics in Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 17–18 December 2020; pp. 341–354. [CrossRef]
- Li, K.J.; Jain, S. Behavior-based pricing: An analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness. Manag. Sci. 2016, 62, 2705–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peine, K.; Heitmann, M.; Herrmann, A. Getting a feel for price affect: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of consumers’ emotional responses to price information. Psychol. Mark. 2009, 26, 39–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, T.Y.; Dekker, R.; Heij, C. Cross-border electronic commerce: Distance effects and express delivery in European Union markets. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2017, 21, 184–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekaran, U.; Bougie, R. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Hogg, R.V.; Tanis, E.A. Probability and Statistical Inference, 8th ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- McCullough, D. A user’s guide to conjoint analysis. Mark. Res. 2002, 14, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
- Chung, T.W.; Lee, Y.J.; Jang, H.M.A. comparative analysis of three major transfer airports in Northeast Asia focusing on Incheon International Airport using a conjoint analysis. Asian J. Shipp. Logist 2017, 33, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Company (Region) | Market Share of Each Company in the Industry | Business Overview |
| Market Kurly (Republic of Korea) | 8.4% | It was established in 2014 and is divided into two main service areas: Market Kurly, specializing in food sales, and Beauty Kurly, specializing in cosmetics sales. It has a strong advantage in delivering fresh food through its representative early-morning delivery service called “Early bird Delivery.” |
| 11st (Republic of Korea) | 6% | It started its service as an open market in 2008. It currently offers next-day delivery service through “Shooting delivery.” |
| Coupang (Republic of Korea) | 13% | It was founded in August 2010 as an online shopping mall. Through its internally built logistics network, it has experienced rapid growth, with its service “Rocket Delivery” offering next-day shipping. |
| SSG.Com (Republic of Korea) | 15% | Established on 1 March 2019, it is an integrated online shopping mall under the umbrella of the Shinsegae Group. It is transitioned from a food-focused service called “SSG Delivery” to introducing “SSG 1 day Delivery,” to expand its product range and complement and expand its existing “SSG Delivery” service. |
| Samdasoo (Republic of Korea) | 43% | Established in 1998, it offers “Samdasoo,” a volcanic rock water, in the market. It has constantly maintained the top market share position since its launch. |
| Amazon (U.S.) | 38% | Established in 1994, it is a U.S. company providing e-commerce and cloud computing services under the name Amazon and Amazon Web Service. |
| Coca-Cola (U.S.) | 46% | Established in 1892, it is a cola brand launched by the Coca-Cola Company in the U.S. |
| Wal Mart (U.S.) | 6.3% | Established in 1969, it is a distribution company that holds 19% of the grocery sales in the U.S. |
| Keywords | Frequency | CAGR |
| Paper cup | 133 | 46% |
| Shopping bag | 132 | 97% |
| Each piece | 53 | 25% |
| Convenience | 50 | 4% |
| Wrapping paper | 93 | 25% |
| Reusable container | 125 | 178% |
| Polypropylene | 81 | 90% |
| Paper box | 54 | 4% |
| Durability | 67 | 53% |
| Plastic | 487 | 13% |
| Eco-friendliness | 71 | 63% |
| One-time | 119 | 16% |
| Recyclable materials | 57 | 24% |
| Reusable | 226 | 105% |
| Deposit | 61 | 87% |
| Recycling rate | 60 | 28% |
| Eco-bag | 78 | 18% |
| Sugar cane | 86 | 13% |
| Microplastic | 53 | 11% |
| Corrugated cardboard | 88 | 50% |
| Overpackaging | 134 | 39% |
| Paper | 507 | 22% |
| Container | 391 | 37% |
| Packaging Process | Attribute | Attribute Level | Attribute Level Descriptions and Examples |
| Packaging attached to the product | Ease of recycling | High/medium/low | Ease of recycling of packaging materials attached to products |
| Outer packaging for delivery | Packaging material | Paper/reusable eco bag | Disposable or reusable packaging materials used in packaging |
| Tape | Paper/transparent box tape | Types of tape used for packaging | |
| Inner packaging for delivery | Buffer material | Paper/vinyl bubble wrap/plastic | Types of buffer material used in packaging |
| Ice pack | Water-type/gel-type | Types of ice packs used when packaging ((ex) fresh food)) | |
| Form of packaging | Form of packaging | Individual packaging/ bundle packaging | When several products are packaged individually or in batches at the time of delivery |
| Delivery service | Delivery speed | Same-day/next-day/more than 2 days | How long it takes to receive the product |
| Price | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30)/KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) | Price of a delivery service |
| Attribute | Attribute Level | Utility | Standard Error |
| Ease of recycling | High | 0.462 | 0.156 |
| Medium | 0.267 | 0.183 | |
| Low | −0.729 | 0.183 | |
| Packaging material | Paper | 0.077 | 0.117 |
| Reusable Eco bag | −0.077 | 0.117 | |
| Tape | Paper tape | 0.214 | 0.117 |
| Transparent box tape | −0.214 | 0.117 | |
| Buffer material | Paper | 0.300 | 0.156 |
| Vinyl bubble wrap | −0.002 | 0.183 | |
| Plastic | −0.298 | 0.183 | |
| Ice pack | Water-type | 0.196 | 0.117 |
| Gel-type | −0.196 | 0.117 | |
| Form of packaging | Individual packaging | −0.191 | 0.117 |
| Bundle packaging | 0.191 | 0.117 | |
| Delivery speed | Same-day | 0.781 | 0.156 |
| Next-day | 0.040 | 0.183 | |
| More than 2 days | −0.821 | 0.183 | |
| Price | KRW 3000 (USD 2.30) | 0.570 | 0.117 |
| KRW 4500 (USD 3.46) | −0.570 | 0.117 | |
| Correlation | Pearson’s R | Kendall’s tau | |
| 0.978 | 0.933 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Park, D.; Choi, D.; Kim, M.; Song, B. Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Eco-Packaging? Insights from LDA and Conjoint Analysis: Evidence from Republic of Korea. Systems 2026, 14, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020128
Park D, Choi D, Kim M, Song B. Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Eco-Packaging? Insights from LDA and Conjoint Analysis: Evidence from Republic of Korea. Systems. 2026; 14(2):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020128
Chicago/Turabian StylePark, Dahyeon, Donghyun Choi, Minseok Kim, and Bomi Song. 2026. "Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Eco-Packaging? Insights from LDA and Conjoint Analysis: Evidence from Republic of Korea" Systems 14, no. 2: 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020128
APA StylePark, D., Choi, D., Kim, M., & Song, B. (2026). Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Eco-Packaging? Insights from LDA and Conjoint Analysis: Evidence from Republic of Korea. Systems, 14(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14020128

