Deliberate and Emergent Strategic Outcomes for High-Growth IT SME Business Models
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Research Design and Methodology
3. Define and Design the Multiple Case Study
3.1. Literature Review
3.1.1. Average Annual Sales Growth (Turnover)
3.1.2. Average Annual Employment Growth
3.1.3. Average Annual Growth in Both Sales and Employment in Consecutive Years
3.1.4. Alternative Outcomes for High Growth
3.1.5. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem as a Moderator
3.2. Deduction of Predictors and Definition of Research Propositions and Questions
3.3. Regulation and Sample for Conducting Multiple Case Studies
4. Prepare, Collect, and Analyse
4.1. Crafting Instruments for Data Collection Protocols with Multiple Sources of Evidence
4.2. Conducting Pilot
4.3. Conducting the Multiple Case Studies
4.4. Triangulation Analysis of the Data Using the Five Sources of Evidence
4.5. Open Coding to Build Categories and Concepts
5. Conclude and Validate
5.1. Validating the Research Propositions: Enfolding the Literature (External Triangulation)
5.2. Modifying the Theory: Logic Model
6. Research Findings
7. Discussion and Conclusions
8. Research Contributions
8.1. Theoretical Contributions
8.2. Methodological Contributions
8.3. Empirical Contributions
9. Research Limitations
9.1. Theoretical Limitations
9.2. Methodological Limitations
10. Recommendations for Future Research
11. Practical Implications
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kotter, J.; Sathe, V. Problems of human resource management in rapidly growing companies. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1978, 21, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Financing Growth and Turning Data into Business: Helping SMEs Scale Up, OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Autio, E.; Rannikko, H. Retaining winners: Can policy boost high-growth entrepreneurship? Res. Policy 2016, 45, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Storey, D.J. Understanding the Small Business Sector; Routledge: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crnogaj, K.; Rus, M. From Start to Scale: Navigating Innovation, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, and Strategic Evolution. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jansen, J.J.; Heavey, C.; Mom, T.J.; Simsek, Z.; Zahra, S.A. Scaling-up: Building, leading and sustaining rapid growth over time. J. Manag. Stud. 2023, 60, 581–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bisztray, M.; de Nicola, F.; Muraközy, B. High-growth firms’ contribution to aggregate productivity growth. Small Bus. Econ. 2022, 60, 771–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erhardt, E.C. Measuring the persistence of high firm growth: Choices and consequences. Small Bus. Econ. 2021, 56, 451–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moen, Ø.; Heggeseth, A.G.; Lome, O. The Positive Effect of Motivation and International Orientation on SME Growth. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2016, 54, 659–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Understanding Firm Growth: Helping SMEs Scale Up, OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidsson, P.; Delmar, F. Hunting for new employment: The role of high-growth firms. In Small Firms and Economic Development in Developed and Transition Economies; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzman, J.; Kacperczyk, A.O. Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 2019, 48, 1666–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fazio, C.; Guzman, J.; Murray, F.; Stern, S. A New View of the Skew: Quantitative Assessment of the Quality of American Entrepreneurship; Kauffman Foundation New Entrepreneurial Growth: Kansas City, MO, USA, 2016; Available online: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5963ccedebbd1a0ffdb5ae00/t/5966278429687fe0ec33c53b/1499867013172/POLICY+REPORT+-+FGMS+New+View+of+the+Skew+KAUFFMAN+FINAL.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Hilmersson, M.; Johanson, M. Speed of SME internationalization and performance. Manag. Int. Rev. 2016, 56, 67–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lecuna, A.; Cohen, B.; Chavez, R. Characteristics of high-growth entrepreneurs in Latin America. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2017, 13, 141–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabrielsson, J.; Dahlstrand, A.L.; Politis, D. Sustainable high-growth entrepreneurship: A study of rapidly growing firms in the Scania region. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. 2014, 15, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goswami, A.G.; Medvedev, D.; Olafsen, E. High-Growth Firms: Facts, Fiction, and Policy Options for Emerging Economies; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/96a13576-bd21-5dad-96ed-075807b06707 (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Bryson, A.; Forth, J. The impact of management practices on SME performance. Natl. Inst. Econ. Soc. Res. 2018, 488. Available online: https://www.niesr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/DP488_0.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Demir, R.; Wennberg, K.; McKelvie, A. The strategic management of high-growth firms: A review and theoretical conceptualization. Long Range Plan. 2017, 50, 431–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ireta Sanchez, J.M. Attributes of scaling up SMEs in the IT sector towards sustaining high-performance business results. J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 2023, 15, 910–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed.; Cosmos Corporation, SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018; Available online: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150 (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Magretta, J. Why business models matter. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2002, 80, 86–92. Available online: https://designblog.uniandes.edu.co/blogs/dise2102pc/files/2013/08/Why_Business_Models_Matter2.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2025). [PubMed]
- Kuhn, T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions; University of Chicago press: Chicago, USA, 1997; Volume 962, Available online: https://www.lri.fr/~mbl/Stanford/CS477/papers/Kuhn-SSR-2ndEd.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Kim, W.; Mauborgne, R. Value innovation: A leap into the blue ocean. J. Bus. Strategy 2005, 26, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christensen, C.M.; Bartman, T.; Van Bever, D. The hard truth about business model innovation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2016, 48, 31–40. Available online: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-hard-truth-about-business-model-innovation/ (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Markides, C.C.; Williamson, P.J. Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 1994, 15, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghoshal, S. Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strateg. Manag. J. 1987, 8, 425–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yip, G.S. Global strategy... in a world of nations. Sloan Manag. Rev. 1989, 31, 29–41. Available online: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/global-strategy-in-a-world-of-nations/ (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Brynjolfsson, E.; McAfee, A. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies; WW Norton & company: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Available online: https://www.as.utexas.edu/astronomy/education/fall15/wheeler/secure/ExponentialGrowth.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Ireta-Sanchez, J.M.; Vásquez-Tejos, F.J. Los Nuevos Modelos de Negocio en la Era de la Tecnología. In Sociedad Tecnológica y Futuro Humano: Retos Sociales y Tecnología; Velázquez-Fernández, H., Ed.; Tirant humanidades: Valencia, Spain, 2022; Volume 3, pp. 43–60. Available online: https://editorial.tirant.com/cl/libro/sociedad-tecnologico-y-futuro-humano-vol-3-retos-sociales-y-tecnologia-hector-velazquez-fernandez-9788418970078 (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Eisenhardt, K.M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 532–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenhardt, K.M. What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strateg. Organ. 2021, 19, 147–160. [Google Scholar]
- Piekkari, R.; Welch, C. The case study in management research: Beyond the positivist legacy of Eisenhardt and Yin. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Graebner, M.E.; Eisenhardt, K.M. The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 2004, 49, 366–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gehman, J.; Glaser, V.L.; Eisenhardt, K.M.; Gioia, D.; Langley, A.; Corley, K.G. Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. J. Manag. Inq. 2018, 27, 284–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Block, J.; Fathollahi, R. Foundation ownership and firm growth. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2023, 17, 2633–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenzie, D. Identifying and spurring high-growth entrepreneurship: Experimental evidence from a business plan competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 2017, 107, 2278–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azoulay, P.; Jones, B.F.; Kim, J.D.; Miranda, J. Age and High-Growth Entrepreneurship. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights 2020, 2, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coad, A.; Srhoj, S. Catching Gazelles with a Lasso: Big data techniques for the prediction of high-growth firms. Small Bus. Econ. 2020, 55, 541–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, N. What holds back high-growth firms? Evidence from UK SMEs. Small Bus. Econ. 2014, 43, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fombrun, C.J.; Wally, S. Structuring small firms for rapid growth. J. Bus. Ventur. 1989, 4, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roure, J.B.; Keeley, R.H. Predictors of success in new technology based ventures. J. Bus. Ventur. 1990, 5, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willard, G.E.; Krueger, D.A.; Feeser, H.R. In order to grow, must the founder go: A comparison of performance between founder and non-founder managed high-growth manufacturing firms. J. Bus. Ventur. 1992, 7, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegel, R.; Siegel, E.; Macmillan, I.C. Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures. J. Bus. Ventur. 1993, 8, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldrich, H.E.; Ruef, M. Unicorns, Gazelles, and Other Distractions on the Way to Understanding Real Entrepreneurship in the United States. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 32, 458–472. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26586052 (accessed on 5 July 2025). [CrossRef]
- Todd, A.; Taylor, B. The baby sharks: Strategies of Britain’s supergrowth companies. Long Range Plan. 1993, 26, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birch, D.L.; Medoff, J. Gazelles. In Labor Markets, Employment Policy and Job Creation; Solmon, L.C., Levenson, A.R., Eds.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA, 1994; pp. 159–168. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429046834-7/gazelles-david-birch-james-medoff (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Birch, D.L.; Haggerty, A.; Parsons, W. Who’s Creating Jobs? Cognetics Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 1995. Available online: https://books.google.cl/books/about/Who_s_Creating_Jobs.html?id=toRXAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Chetty, S.; Campbell-Hunt, C. Paths to internationalisation among small- to medium-sized firms: A global versus regional approach. Eur. J. Mark. 2003, 37, 796–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Regan, N.; Ghobadian, A.; Gallear, D. In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation 2006, 26, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, A.M.; Casillas, J.C. High-growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: A discriminant analysis. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2007, 19, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, S.C.; Storey, D.J.; Van Witteloostuijn, A. What happens to gazelles? The importance of dynamic management strategy. Small Bus. Econ. 2010, 35, 203–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbero, J.L.; Casillas, J.C.; Feldman, H.D. Managerial capabilities and paths to growth as determinants of high-growth small and medium-sized enterprises. Int. Small Bus. J. Res. Entrep. 2011, 29, 671–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro, J.L.B.; Casillas, J.C.; Barringer, B. Forms of growth: How SMEs combine forms of growth to achieve high growth. J. Manag. Organ. 2012, 18, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hölzl, W. Persistence, survival, and growth: A closer look at 20 years of fast-growing firms in Austria. Ind. Corp. Change 2014, 23, 199–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. Scale-Up Success: What do SMEs Need to Supercharge Their Growth? ACCA: London, UK, 2018. Available online: https://www.accaglobal.com/gb/en/professional-insights/global-profession/scale-up.html (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Hambrick, D.C.; Crozier, L.M. Stumblers and stars in the management of rapid growth. J. Bus. Ventur. 1985, 1, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barringer, B.R.; Jones, F.F.; Neubaum, D.O. A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. J. Bus. Ventur. 2005, 20, 663–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Temouri, Y. High-growth firms and productivity: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Small Bus. Econ. 2015, 44, 123–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feeser, H.R.; Willard, G.E. Incubators and performance: A comparison of high-and low-growth high-tech firms. J. Bus. Ventur. 1989, 4, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gundry, L.K.; Welsch, H.P. The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. J. Bus. Ventur. 2001, 16, 453–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baum, J.R.; Bird, B.J. The Successful Intelligence of High-Growth Entrepreneurs: Links to New Venture Growth. Organ. Sci. 2010, 21, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez-Garcia, P.; Puente, S. What makes a high-growth firm? A dynamic probit analysis using Spanish firm-level data. Small Bus. Econ. 2012, 39, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brüderl, J.; Preisendörfer, P. Fast-Growing Businesses. Int. J. Sociol. 2000, 30, 45–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almus, M. What characterizes a fast-growing firm? Appl. Econ. 2002, 34, 1497–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, M.; Mcguinness, S. Small Firm Growth in the UK Regions 1994-1997: Towards an Explanatory Framework. Reg. Stud. 2003, 37, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goedhuys, M.; Sleuwaegen, L. High-growth entrepreneurial firms in Africa: A quantile regression approach. Small Bus. Econ. 2010, 34, 31–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawless, M. Age or size? Contributions to job creation. Small Bus. Econ. 2014, 42, 815–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smallbone, D.; Leig, R.; North, D. The characteristics and strategies of high growth SMEs. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 1995, 1, 44–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidsson, P.; Delmar, F. High-growth firms and their contribution to employment: The case of Sweden 1987–96. In Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms; Edward Elgar Publishing: Tallinn, Estonia, 2006; pp. 156–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ensley, M.D.; Pearson, A.W.; Sardeshmukh, S.R. The negative consequences of pay dispersion in family and non-family top management teams: An exploratory analysis of new venture, high-growth firms. J. Bus. Res. 2007, 60, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anyadike-Danes, M.; Bonner, K.; Hart, M.; Mason, C. Measuring Business Growth: High-Growth Firms and Their Contribution to Employment in the UK; Research Report; NESTA: London, UK, 2009; Available online: https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/18370/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Stam, E.; Wennberg, K. The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Bus. Econ. 2009, 33, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anyadike-Danes, M.; Bonner, K.; Hart, M. Exploring the Incidence and Spatial Distribution of High Growth Firms in the UK and Their Contribution to Job Creation; Working Paper No. 13/05; NESTA: London, UK, 2013; Available online: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/exploring-the-incidence-and-spatial-distribution-of-high-growth-firms-in-the-uk/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Senderovitz, M.; Klyver, K.; Steffens, P. Four years on: Are the gazelles still running? A longitudinal study of firm performance after a period of rapid growth. Int. Small Bus. J. 2016, 34, 391–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuman, J.C.; Shaw, J.J.; Sussman, G. Strategic planning in smaller rapid growth companies. Long Range Plan. 1985, 18, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halabisky, D.; Dreessen, E.; Parsley, C. Growth in firms in Canada, 1985–1999. J. Small Bus. Entrep. 2006, 19, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD/Eurostat. OECD-Eurostat Manual on Business Demography Statistics. 2007. Available online: https://web-archive.oecd.org/2012-06-25/130555-39974460.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Acs, Z.J.; Parsons, W.; Tracy, S. High-Impact Firms: Gazelles Revisited; Corporate Research Board, LLC: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; Volume 18, pp. 228–351. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267218946_High-Impact_Firms_Gazelles_Revisited (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Morris, R. High-Impact Entrepreneurship Global Report; Center for High-Impact Entrepreneurship at Endeavor and Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM): Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 2011; Available online: https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=47124 (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Keen, C.; Etemad, H. Rapid growth and rapid internationalization: The case of smaller enterprises from Canada. Manag. Decis. 2012, 50, 569–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segarra, A.; Teruel, M. High-growth firms and innovation: An empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Bus. Econ. 2014, 43, 805–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Autio, E.; Arenius, P.; Wallenius, H. Economic impact of gazelle firms in Finland. In Proceedings of the Babson-Kauffman Conference in Research on Entrepreneurship, Babson College, Babson, MA, USA, 8–10 June 2000; pp. 1–10. Available online: https://digitalcollections.babson.edu/digital/collection/ferpapers/id/2806/ (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Littunen, H.; Tohmo, T. The high growth in new metal-based manufacturing and business service firms in Finland. Small Bus. Econ. 2003, 21, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H. Does combining different types of innovation always improve SME performance? An analysis of innovation complementarity. J. Innov. Knowl. 2022, 7, 100192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coutu, S. The Scale-Up Review on Economic Growth 2016; Scale up Institute: London, UK, 2016; Available online: https://www.scaleupinstitute.org.uk/reports/annual-scaleup-review-2016/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Altinay, L.; Madanoglu, M.; De Vita, G.; Arasli, H.; Ekinci, Y. The Interface between Organizational Learning Capability, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and SME Growth. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2016, 54, 871–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, D.F. The microeconomic impact on growth of SMEs when the access to finance widens: Evidence from internet & high-tech industry. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 220, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whorwood, H. (Ed.) The Scaleup Index 2022; Scaleup Institute: London, UK, 2022; Available online: https://www.scaleupinstitute.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ScaleUp-Index-2022.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Markman, G.D.; Gartner, W.B. Is Extraordinary Growth Profitable? A Study of Inc. 500 High-Growth Companies. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2002, 27, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coad, A.; Daunfeldt, S.-O.; Johansson, D.; Wennberg, K. Whom do high-growth firms hire? Ind. Corp. Change 2014, 23, 293–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dillen, Y.; Laveren, E.; Martens, R.; De Vocht, S.; Van Imschoot, E. Growth persistence and profile robustness of high-growth firms. Int. J. Entrep. Ventur. 2014, 6, 299–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daunfeldt, S.O.; Halvarsson, D. Are high-growth firms one-hit wonders? Evidence from Sweden. Small Bus. Econ. 2015, 44, 361–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandberg, W.R.; Hofer, C.W. Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. J. Bus. Ventur. 1988, 2, 5–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahlqvist, J.; Davidsson, P.; Wiklund, J. Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: A replication and extension of the Cooper et al. study. Enterp. Innov. Manag. Stud. 2000, 1, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloodgood, J.M.; Sapienza, H.J.; Almeida, J.G. The Internationalization of New High-Potential U.S. Ventures: Antecedents and Outcomes. Entrep. Theory Pract. 1996, 20, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, G.N.; Hanks, S.H. Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study. J. Bus. Ventur. 1993, 8, 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achtenhagen, L.; Naldi, L.; Melin, L. Business Growth—Do Practitioners and Scholars Really Talk about the Same Thing? Entrep. Theory Pract. 2010, 34, 289–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannerjee, S.; Bielli, S.; Haley, C. Scaling Together: Overcoming Barriers in Corporate-Startup Collaboration; NESTA: London, UK, 2016; Available online: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/scaling-together-overcoming-barriers-in-corporate-startup-collaborations/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Love, J.H.; Roper, S. SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. Int. Small Bus. J. 2015, 33, 28–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barkham, R.; Gudgin, G.; Hanvey, E. Determinants of Small Firm Growth: An Inter-Regional Study in the United Kingdom 1986-90; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2002; Volume 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delmar, F.; Davidsson, P.; Gartner, W.B. Arriving at the high-growth firm. J. Bus. Ventur. 2003, 18, 189–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acs, Z.J. Foundations of high impact entrepreneurship. In Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship; Now Publishers Inc.: Delft, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 4, pp. 535–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Ma, F. A quantitative analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their entrepreneurs in China. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2008, 15, 675–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidsson, P.; Delmar, F. High-growth firms: Characteristics, job contribution and method observations. In Proceedings of the Rent XI Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 27–28 November 1997; Available online: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/68083/2/68083.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Richbell, S.M.; Watts, H.D.; Wardle, P. Owner-managers and business planning in the small firm. Int. Small Bus. J. 2006, 24, 496–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ireta-Sanchez, J.M. From establishment to scaling up of an SME in the IT sector: Deliberate and emergent strategies as critical essentials for the sustainable business model. J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 2024, 16, 1737–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henrekson, M.; Johansson, D. Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Bus. Econ. 2010, 35, 227–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreyer, P. High-Growth Firms and Employment. OECD Science, Technology and Industry; Working Papers, 2000/03; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidsson, P.; Henrekson, M. Determinants of the prevalance of start-ups and high-growth firms. Small Bus. Econ. 2002, 19, 81–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wadhwani, R.D.; Kirsch, D.; Welter, F.; Gartner, W.B.; Jones, G.G. Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2020, 14, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinoza-Benavides, J.; Guerrero, M.; Díaz, D. Dissecting the ecosystems’ determinants of entrepreneurial re-entry after a business failure. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2021, 33, 975–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrero, M.; Liñán, F.; Cáceres-Carrasco, F.R. The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: A comparison across developed and developing economies. Small Bus. Econ. 2021, 57, 1733–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bullough, A.; Guelich, U.; Manolova, T.S.; Schjoedt, L. Women’s entrepreneurship and culture: Gender role expectations and identities, societal culture, and the entrepreneurial environment. Small Bus. Econ. 2022, 58, 985–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dillen, Y.; Vandekerkhof, P. Does the sector matter? An analysis of high-growth firms and industry growth rates. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2021, 28, 927–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantner, U.; Cunningham, J.A.; Lehmann, E.E.; Menter, M. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A dynamic lifecycle model. Small Bus. Econ. 2021, 57, 407–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mintzberg, H.; Ahlstrand, B.; Lampel, J.B. Strategy Safari: The Complete Guide Through the Wilds of Strategic Management; Pearson: London, UK, 2020; Available online: https://myindustry.ir/files/Strategy-Safari-Mintzberg.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Hill, S.; Ionescu-Somers, A.; Coduras, A.; Guerrero, M.; Roomi, M.A.; Bosma, N.; Sahasranamam, S.; Shay, J. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2021/2022 Global Report: Opportunity Amid Disruption. In Expo 2020 Dubai; Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship, Strategy and Innovation: Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2022; Available online: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-20212022-global-report-opportunity-amid-disruption (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Barzelay, M. The Single Case Study as Intellectually Ambitious Inquiry. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 1993, 3, 305–318. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1181786 (accessed on 24 June 2024). [CrossRef]
- Bonache, J. The challenge of using a ‘non-positivist’ paradigm and getting through the peer-review process. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2021, 31, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graebner, M.E. Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 2004, 25, 751–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saldaña, J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers; SAGE Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 1–440, ISBN-13: 978-1529731743. Available online: https://www.karlancer.com/api/file/1689576529-m4EL.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Creswell, J.W. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research; SAGE publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014; Available online: https://books.google.cl/books/about/A_Concise_Introduction_to_Mixed_Methods.html?id=1xTYzQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Maxwell, J.A. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, 2nd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2005; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43220402_Qualitative_Research_Design_An_Interactive_Approach_JA_Maxwell (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques, 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008; Available online: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/basics-of-qualitative-research/toc (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Clark, D.R.; Crawford, G.C.; Pidduck, R.J. Exceptionality in entrepreneurship: Systematically investigating outlier outcomes. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 2023, 20, e00422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice; Sage publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2015; Available online: https://au.sagepub.com/en-gb/oce/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962 (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Zhang, D.; Lucey, B.M. Sustainable behaviors and firm performance: The role of financial constraints’ alleviation. Econ. Anal. Policy. 2022, 74, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanuddin, R.; Darman, D.; Taufan, M.Y.; Salim, A.; Muslim, M.; Putra, A.H.P.K. The effect of firm size, debt, current ratio, and investment opportunity set on earnings quality: An empirical study in Indonesia. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2021, 8, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansikkamäki, S. Firm growth and profitability: The role of age and size in shifts between growth–profitability configurations. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 2023, 19, e00372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rail Supply Group. Creating the Market Conditions for Growth. Retrieved 22 October 2019; Rail Supply Group: London, UK, 2019; Available online: https://www.railsupplygroup.org/workstream/growth/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Goldman & Sachs. Unlocking UK Productivity: Internationalization and Innovation in SMEs; Goldman & Sachs: London, UK, 2015; Available online: https://www.enterpriseresearch.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Internationalisation-and-Innovation-Report-web-pages-.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Léon, F. The elusive quest for high-growth firms in Africa: When other metrics of performance say nothing. Small Bus. Econ. 2022, 58, 225–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coad, A.; Karlsson, J. A field guide for gazelle hunters: Small, old firms are unlikely to become high-growth firms. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 2022, 17, e00286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Nicola, F.; Muraközy, B.; Tan, S.W. Spillovers from high-growth firms: Evidence from Hungary. Small Bus. Econ. 2021, 57, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannò, M.; Varum, C.A. Champions during Crises Scenarios: High Growth and Persistent High Growth Firms. Res. Appl. Econ. 2021, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabinovich, J. Tangible and intangible investments and sales growth of US firms. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 2023, 66, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fariborzi, H.; Osiyevskyy, O.; DaSilva, C. The effect of geographic scope on growth and growth variability of SMEs. J. World Bus. 2022, 57, 101371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Kim, A. Going viral or growing like an oak tree? Towards sustainable local development through entrepreneurship. Acad. Manag. J. 2022, 65, 1709–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meuric, P.L.; Favre-Bonté, V. International high-growth of early internationalizing firms: A feedback loop experience. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2024, 62, 1781–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henn, R.; Terzidis, O.; Kuschel, K.; Leiva, J.C.; Alsua, C. One step back, two steps forward: Internationalization strategies and the resilient growth of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Enterp. Res. 2022, 29, 273–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srhoj, S.; Coad, A.; Walde, J. HGX: The anatomy of high-growth exporters. Small Bus. Econ. 2024, 63, 1695–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianchini, S.; Bottazzi, G.; Tamagni, F. What does (not) characterize persistent corporate high-growth? Small Bus. Econ. 2017, 48, 633–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cusmano; Koreen, M.; Pissareva, L. 2018 OECD Ministerial Conference on SMEs: Key Issues Paper; OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, No. 7; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatti, S.H.; Ahmed, A.; Ferraris, A.; Hussain, W.M.H.W.; Wamba, S.F. Big data analytics capabilities and MSME innovation and performance: A double mediation model of digital platform and network capabilities. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Audretsch, D.B.; Belitski, M.; Caiazza, R.; Phan, P. Collaboration strategies and SME innovation performance. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 164, 114018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niyi Anifowose, O.; Ghasemi, M.; Olaleye, B.R. Total quality management and small and medium-sized enterprises’(SMEs) performance: Mediating role of innovation speed. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostaghel, R.; Oghazi, P.; Parida, V.; Sohrabpour, V. Digitalization driven retail business model innovation: Evaluation of past and avenues for future research trends. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 146, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escoz Barragan, K.; Hassan, S.S.; Meisner, K.; Bzhalava, L. Dynamics of digital change–measuring the digital transformation and its impacts on the innovation activities of SMEs. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2025, 28, 1625–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latifi, M.A.; Nikou, S.; Bouwman, H. Business model innovation and firm performance: Exploring causal mechanisms in SMEs. Technovation 2021, 107, 102274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rumanti, A.A.; Rizana, A.F.; Achmad, F. Exploring the role of organizational creativity and open innovation in enhancing SMEs performance. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bresciani, S.; Huarng, K.-H.; Malhotra, A.; Ferraris, A. Digital transformation as a springboard for product, process and business model innovation. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 128, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardito, L.; Raby, S.; Albino, V.; Bertoldi, B. The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 123, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standaert, T.; Collewaert, V.; Vanacker, T. Regulatory institutions and cross-country differences in high-growth entrepreneurship rates: A configurational approach. J. Bus. Ventur. 2025, 40, 106469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fotopoulos, G. Knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurial ecosystems and the geography of high-growth firms. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2023, 47, 1877–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stam, E.; Van de Ven, A. Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Bus. Econ. 2021, 56, 809–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Audretsch, D.B.; Belitski, M. Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: The role of creative class and entrepreneurship. Reg. Stud. 2021, 55, 735–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elia, G.; Margherita, A.; Passiante, G. Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 150, 119791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratten, V. Coronavirus and international business: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2020, 62, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GEM (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2023/2024 Global Report: 25 Years and Growing; GEM: London, UK, 2023; Available online: https://gemconsortium.org/report/global-entrepreneurship-monitor-gem-20232024-global-report-25-years-and-growing (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Carrasco-Carvajal, O.; García-Pérez-de-Lema, D.; Castillo-Vergara, M. Impact of innovation strategy, absorptive capacity, and open innovation on SME performance: A Chilean case study. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2023, 9, 100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rompho, N. Operational performance measures for startups. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2018, 22, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamakawa, Y.; Peng, M.W.; Deeds, D.L. Rising from the ashes: Cognitive determinants of venture growth after entrepreneurial failure. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2015, 39, 209–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author(s) | % Avg. Annual Growth | Consecutive Years of HG | Established Definition | Country | Period Analysis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Small Firms | Fombrun & Wally (1989) [42] | 159 avg. | 5 | 5 years 1 | USA | 1980–1985 |
Roure & Keeley (1990) [43] | 25+ | 59 months | First funding 2 | USA | 1974–1982 | |
Willard et al. (1992) [44] | 151 avg. 3 | >5 | USD 100,000 4 | USA | 1985–1990 | |
Siegel et al. (1993) [45] | Double 5 | >3 | Less than 5 years 6 | USA | 1974–1982 | |
Storey (2016) [4] | Double 7 | >10 | UK | 1990 | ||
Aldrich & Ruef (2018) [46] | >20% | >5 | Profitable 6 years | USA | 1990–2017 | |
SMEs | Todd & Taylor (1993) [47] | >20% | >10 | 5–7 years 8 | UK | 1980–1990 |
Birch & Medoff (1994) [48] | Double | Over period | USA | |||
Birch et al. (1995) [49] | >20% | Annual | USD 100,000+ | USA | ||
Chetty et al. (2003) [50] | Double 9 | 3–4 10 | Exporting before 1984 | New Zealand | 1984 | |
O’Regan et al. (2006) [51] | >30% | >3 | 5+ | UK | 2000 | |
Moreno & Casillas (2007) [52] | >100% | 3–4 | Less than 10 years | Spain | 1998–2001 | |
Parker et al. (2010) [53] | >30% | 4 | Sales GBP 5 to GBP 100 millions | UK | 1992–2010 | |
Barbero et al. (2011) [54] | >10% | >5 | Less than 250 emp. | Spain | 2001–2005 | |
Navarro et al. (2012) [55] | >10% | >5 | Avg. 32 emp. 11 | Spain | 2001–2005 | |
Hölzl (2014) [56] | >50% | 3 | At least 1 emp. | Austria | 1972–2007 | |
ACCA (2018) [57] | Avg. 20–30% | >3 | Fewer than 250 emp. 12 | 179 countries | 2018 | |
Large | Hambrick et al. (1985) [58] | >20 13 | >5 | Sales no more than 25 m | USA | 1976–1980 |
Barringer et al. (2005) [59] | >80% | 3 | 10 years younger | USA | 1998 | |
Du & Temouri (2015) [60] | >20% | >3 | 10 or more emp. | UK | 2001–2010 | |
All Sizes | Feeser & Willard (1989) [61] | 62.5% avg. | >5 | Sales USD 100,000–USD 25 m | USA | 1981–1985 |
Gundry & Welsch (2001) [62] | >23% | >2 | Germany | 2000 | ||
Baum & Bird (2010) [63] | 11% avg. | 4 | 5 emp. | USA | 2001–2005 | |
Lopez-Garcia et al. (2012) [64] | Double | 5 | Sales more than USD 100,000 | Spain | 1996–2003 |
Author(s) | % Avg. Annual Growth | Consecutive Years of HG | Established Definition | Country | Period Analysis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Small Firms | Brüederl et al. (2000) [65] | Double 2 | >4 | >4 years 3 | Germany | 1986–1990 |
Almus (2002) [66] | Double 4 | >5 | 1st few years | Germany | 1999 | |
Hart & McGuinness (2003) [67] | 13.3% | >3 | <500% 5 | UK | 1994–1997 | |
Goedhuys & Sleuwaegen (2010) [68] | >30% 8 | 3 | 5–500 jobs | 11 African | 2002–2005 | |
Lawless (2014) [69] | 11.3% 9 | >7 | 50–250 jobs 10 | USA | 2007–2010 | |
SMEs | Smallbone et al. (1995) [70] | Avg. 159% | 10 | >GBP 0.5 millions 1 | UK | 1979–1990 |
Davidsson & Delmar (2006) [71] | >10% | 10 | >20 jobs | Sweden | 1987–1996 | |
Ensley et al. (2007) [72] | 10.4–25.3% | 3 | 6.6–7.75 years | USA | 1996–2003 | |
Anyadike-Danes et al. (2009) [73] | >20% 6 | >2–3 | >5 years 7 | UK | 2002–2008 | |
Lee (2014) [41] | +20% | 2 | +10–250 jobs | UK | 1996–2003 | |
All Sizes | Stam & Wennberg (2009) [74] | >50% 11 | First 6 | 6+ years | Netherlands | 1994–2000 |
Anyadike-Danes et al. (2013) [75] | 22–27% | 3 | >10 jobs 12 | UK | 1998–2010 | |
Senderovitz et al. (2016) [76] | 9 jobs | 4 | >20% ROE | Denmark | 1998–2010 |
Autor(s) | Avg. Sales Annual Growth | Avg. Emp. Annual Growth | Consecutive Years of HG | Established Definition | Country | Period Analysis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Small Firms | Shuman et al. (1985) [77] | 71.76% | 38% | >5 | >USD 100,000−USD 25 millions | USA | 1978–1982 |
Halabisky et al. (2013) [78] | >33.96% 1 | >33.9% | >4 | 20–49 jobs | Canada | 1985–1999 | |
OECD Eurostat (2007) [79] | >206% | >20% | >4 | >10 jobs <5 yr | International | ||
Acs et al. (2008) [80] | Doubled | Doubled | >4 | 25 yr old 2 | USA | 1994–2006 | |
Morris (2011) [81] | Moderate 5–20 | 38% | >5 | >10 Yr. >34 jobs | >60 countries | 2006–2016 | |
Keen et al. (2012) [82] | 82.27% | 461.10% | >5 | >10.64 Yr. 3 | Canada | 2003–2008 | |
Segarra et al. (2014) [83] | >80% | >80% | >4 | >10 jobs | Spain | 2004–2008 | |
SMEs | Autio et al. (2000) [84] | Doubled; <506% | Doubled; Avg. 8 | 3 | <20 jobs | Finland | 1994–1997 |
Littunen & Tohmo (2003) [85] | Doubled 4 | >7 jobs | >7 | Start-up 1990 | Finland | 1990–1997 | |
Zhang et al. (2008) [86] | >USD 40; Slow < 5 | >40%; Slow < 5 jobs | 3 | <50 jobs | China | 2001–2003 | |
Coutu (2016) [87] | >20% | >20% | >3 | >10 jobs | UK | 2016 | |
Altinay et al. (2016) [88] | 564% | 243% | >2 | 2–50 jobs 10 Yr. | Cyprus | 2011–2012 | |
Moreira (2016) [89] | >20% | >20% | 3 | >10 jobs | Europa | 2015 | |
OECD (2021) [10] | >20% | >20% | 3 | >6 Yr.; >10 jobs | Intl. | 2015–2017 | |
Bisztray et al. (2022) [7] | 20–30% | 20–30% | 3 | >10 jobs | Hungary | 2013–2016 | |
OECD (2022) [2] | 10% | 10% | 3 | >10 jobs | OECD | 2021–2022 | |
Whorwood, H. (Ed). (2022) [90] | >20% | >20% | 5–10 | >10 jobs | UK | 2017–2021 | |
Ireta Sanchez (2023) [20] | 73.30% | 73.30% | 4 | 2 Yr. | Chile | 2015–2018 | |
Large | Kotter & Sathe (1978) [1] | 40% | >20% | >4–5 | USA | 1971–1977 | |
Markman et al. (2002) [91] | >500% | >18% | >5 | >USD 200,000 sales | USA | 1992–1998 | |
Coad et al. (2014) [92] | >5–10% | >5–10% | 3 | 1–5% fast | Swedeen | 1999–2002 | |
All Sizes | Dilllen et al. (2014) [93] | >72.8% | >72.8% | 3 | 10 jobs | Belgium | 2000–2009 |
Daunfeldt et al. (2015) [94] | SME 15.8–18.2% 6 | SME 11.8; Large 12.8 | >3 | >10 jobs 7 | Sweden | 1999–2008 | |
Coad & Srhoj (2020) [40] | 20% | >7.8% | 4 | >3 jobs | Croatia 5 | 2003–2016 | |
Erhardt (2021) [8] | 20% | >21.3% | >3 | >10 jobs | Bulgari | 2001–2010 | |
Jansen et al. (2023) [6] | >20% | >20%; >50 jobs | >3 | >10 jobs <10 Yr. | International | 1995–2022 |
Case | Business Description | Start-Up Year | High-Growth Period | Established Years Before High Growth | Founder Profession |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-A | Develop telemedicine and technological platforms for health care institutions | 2009 | 2010–2013 | 2 | Electronic Engineer, MBA |
2017-B | Provide telecommunications and IT Equipment | 2013 | 2014–2017 | 2 | Industrial Engineer, MBA |
2018-C | Develop business platforms B2B | 2014 | 2014–2017 | 1 | Business Management, MBA |
2018-D | Develop business platforms for education and smart cities | 2014 | 2014–2017 | 1 | Electronic Engineer, Master’s in Innovation |
2018-E | Provides IT consulting services | 2009 | 2010–2013 | 2 | Electronic Engineer, MBA |
2018-F | Provides IT consulting services | 2014 | 2014–2017 | 1 | Computer Engineer |
2018-G | Develop business platforms B2B | 2015 | 2015–2018 | 1 | Electrical Engineer, MBA |
2018-H | Provide IT consulting services | 2014 | 2014–2018 | 1 | Computer Engineer |
2018-I | Provide business intelligence for used car sales | 2015 | 2015–2018 | 1 | Computer Engineer |
2018-J | Provide IT consulting services | 2016 | 2016–2018 | 1 | Computer Engineer |
2018-K | Provide IT consulting services | 2008 | 2013–2016 | 6 | Computer Engineer |
2018-L | Provide B2B supply chain solutions | 2013 | 2014–2017 | 2 | Computer Engineer, MBA |
2018-M | Provide automotive information and technology | 2011 | 2014–2016 | 4 | Industrial Engineer |
2018-N | Provide a platform for bank transfer | 2012 | 2015–2018 | 4 | Computer Engineer |
2018-O | Develop platforms for academic programming | 2013 | 2015–2018 | 3 | Electronic Engineer, MSC in Electronics |
Documentation | Archival Records | Direct Observation | Physical Artefacts | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case | Interviews Quote | Financial Reports | Business Plan | Budget | Structure | Surveys | Annual Sales Growth Since Start-Up | Annual Employment Growth Since Start-Up | Annual Increase in Sales During High-Growth Period | Years of HG | Staff 2018 | Export 1 | Web Page | Business Platform |
2017-A | “Expansion can generate sales at the same time, but sales must go hand in hand with internationalization”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 38.2% | 44.2% | 114.7% | 4 | 54 | Ar Col Pr | √ | √ | |
2017-B | “Most [entrepreneurs] have to achieve exponential growth [profits] when they start an SME because they are usually new businesses”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 77.8% | 23.2% | 100.0% | 4 | 7 | Col | √ | √ | |
2018-C | “The services that do not rent a little and then become products will rent us a lot more [profits]”. | √ | √ | √ | 58.5% | 31.6% | 91.3% | 4 | 6 | Bl Col | √ | |||
2018-D | “And from the moment we achieved positive profits, almost 3 years have passed”. | √ | √ | √ | 73.2% | 18.9% | 81.5% | 4 | 12 | Col Mx | √ | |||
2018-E | “It is necessary to have very good years [positive profits]”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 25.9% | 32.4% | 71.0% | 4 | 25 | Local | √ | ||
2018-F | “It started with profits of more than 20 million dollars, which is enough”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 29.5% | 49.5% | 30.0% | 4 | 10 | Local | √ | ||
2018-G | “You can grow little by little [profits]. Not all entrepreneurships can be the same”. | √ | √ | √ | 100.0% | 10.7% | 100.0% | 4 | 2 | Local | √ | |||
2018-H | “The market is highly competitive, which affects prices and profitability”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 31.5% | 25.7% | 31.5% | 5 | 5 | Local | √ | ||
2018-I | “A development [new service]. should give us practically 50% revenue”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 25.0% | 26.0% | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | Local | √ | ||
2018-J | “Compared to 2017, we have very good projections for scaling up in terms of projects and sales”. | √ | √ | 100.0% | 41.4% | 100.0% | 3 | 4 | Local | √ | ||||
2018-K | “They hired people, they expanded, they increased their physical space, but they didn’t do it very well because of lack of sales”. | √ | √ | 21.7% | 29.2% | 26.0% | 4 | 26 | Ar Col Pr | √ | ||||
2018-L | “We are the Chileans who went to the United States to sell technology”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 110.7% | 82.1% | 121.0% | 4 | 40 | Ar Br Col Mx Pr | √ | √ | |
2018-M | “Now, yes, now we are [making positive profits]”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 60.3% | 50.5% | 69.0% | 3 | 35 | Col Mx Pr | √ | √ | |
2018-N | “Positive profits, but to generate money in the short term”. | √ | √ | √ | √ | 54.0% | 39.9% | 100.0% | 4 | 15 | Bl Co | √ | √ |
Themes | Categories | Sub Categories | Open Codes | 2017-A | 2017-B | 2018-C | 2018-D | 2018-E | 2018-F | 2018-G | 2018-H | 2018-I | 2018-J | 2018-K | 2018-L | 2018-M | 2018-N | 2018-O |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Profits | Financial contingency strategy | Lack of liquidity | Securing the financial structure | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Start-up financial investment | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Lack of funds | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
New funding plan | Emergency financial plan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Agreements with financial institutions | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Family loans | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Lack of funds | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Reluctance to invest | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Securing the financial structure | Optimisation | Cost reduction | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Efficient technological resources | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Contingency plan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Best suppliers | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Productivity | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Operational excellence and lean management | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Management & control | Securing the financial structure | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Ensuring availability of internal funding | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Controlled growth | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate governance | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Systems documentation of the process | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Rapid Sales | Staying engaged with customers | Efficient business solutions | Immediate solutions | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Solving problems efficiently | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Meeting customer requirements | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Consultancy services—IT Solutions | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Effective business solutions for clients | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Competitive price | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
High level of customer experience | Close connection with clients | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Complementary services | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Empathy with clients | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Listening customer | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Extended warranties | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
High level of service | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Strong customer loyalty | Customer loyalty | |||||||||||||||||
Customer recommendation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Customer satisfaction | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Strategic alliances with clients | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Customer trust | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Breakthrough customer strategy | Marketing strategy | Digital marketing | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Market focus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Competitive market | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Market position | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing plan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Sales roadmap | Strategic alliances with clients | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Rapid positive sales results | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Sales strategies | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Sales team | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Strategic alliances with clients | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Business trade shows | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Geographical Expansion | Favourable domestic trading | Impact of international competition | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Joint ventures | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Regional business focus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Growing into new markets | International competitiveness | Outstanding product brands worldwide | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Distribution channel | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Impact of international competition | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
International certifications and patents | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
International diversification | Solid international diversification | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Product diversification | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Leading products and advanced technology | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Innovation | Competitive Advantage | Uniqueness performance | Innovative business model | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Operational excellence | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Efficient technological resources | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Significant improvements | Business differentiation | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Vanguard in products and advanced technologies | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Adapting to change | Recently created | International certifications and patents | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Management innovation | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
New products and services | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Rapid adaptations | Flexible set of services and support | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Knowledge limitation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Talent to react to the new business market | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem | External threats | Adverse public environment | Government situation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
No regulations to stimulate entrepreneurship | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
Economic fluctuations | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Variation in reforms | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Tax payment systeT | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Business context difficulties | Structural changes in sectors | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Constraints in the business environment | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Market saturation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Business opportunities | Favourable business environment | Dynamic business environment | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Positive public policy & regulatory intervention | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Positive IT environment | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ireta-Sánchez, J.M. Deliberate and Emergent Strategic Outcomes for High-Growth IT SME Business Models. Systems 2025, 13, 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080621
Ireta-Sánchez JM. Deliberate and Emergent Strategic Outcomes for High-Growth IT SME Business Models. Systems. 2025; 13(8):621. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080621
Chicago/Turabian StyleIreta-Sánchez, Juan Martín. 2025. "Deliberate and Emergent Strategic Outcomes for High-Growth IT SME Business Models" Systems 13, no. 8: 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080621
APA StyleIreta-Sánchez, J. M. (2025). Deliberate and Emergent Strategic Outcomes for High-Growth IT SME Business Models. Systems, 13(8), 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080621