Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Land Use Mix on Urban Vitality: A Systemic Conceptualization and Mechanistic Exploration
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Affective Mechanisms in Relaxing Video Games: Sentiment and Topic Analysis of User Reviews
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Robustness of the Global LNG Trade Network: The Impact of the Russia–Ukraine Conflict
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Time-Varying Reliability Analysis of Integrated Power System Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network

Department of Management Engineering and Equipment Economics, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2025, 13(7), 541; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070541
Submission received: 12 May 2025 / Revised: 27 June 2025 / Accepted: 1 July 2025 / Published: 2 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Reliability Engineering for Complex Systems)

Abstract

In response to the limitations of traditional static reliability analysis methods in characterizing the reliability changes of the Integrated Power System, this paper proposes a time-varying reliability analysis framework based on a Dynamic Bayesian Network. By embedding a multi-physics coupled degradation model into the conditional probability nodes of the Dynamic Bayesian Network, a joint stochastic differential equation for the degradation process was constructed, and the dynamic correlation between continuous degradation and discrete fault events throughout the entire life cycle was achieved. A modified method for modeling continuous degradation systems was proposed, which effectively solves the numerical stability problem of modeling complex degradation systems. Finally, the applicability and correctness of the model were verified through numerical examples, and the results showed that the analysis framework can be effectively applied to time-varying reliability assessment and dynamic health management of complex equipment systems such as the Integrated Power System.

1. Introduction

The Integrated Power System (IPS) for warships combines a traditional warship power system with an electric system, resulting in increased systemic interdependencies and complexity. It is a typical complex equipment system, and its reliability will directly affect the stable operation of the system and the smooth completion of tasks [1]. During service, the system is affected by factors such as dynamic degradation, time-varying loads, and multi-state coupling. Consequently, the focus of its reliability analysis has been shifting from static scenarios to high-dynamic time-varying scenarios. For dynamic reliability, its reliability index can be considered as the probability of equipment operating without faults during a certain period of time. Traditional static reliability analysis methods have difficulty effectively describing its time-varying characteristics. Therefore, accurately analyzing the reliability variation law of the IPS, obtaining more accurate life assessment parameters, is conducive to mastering the health of the system, guiding maintenance work, and improving economic benefits [2].
The operation of the IPS involves multiple dynamic variables and is influenced by various factors. Firstly, during its service life, the system is affected by factors such as temperature changes and vibrations. The coupled stress of temperature vibration triggers a chain reaction of multi-scale multi-physics field failure. At the micro level, it manifests as material performance degradation and structural dynamic characteristic shift, forming nonlinear coupling effects. At the macro level, it manifests as cascading failures of functional chains under dynamic load interactions, leading to reliability degradation. The degradation has non-stationary and polymorphic correlation characteristics [3]. Second, the complex and ever-changing marine environment, coupled with frequent switching of system operating condition (SOC), often has an impact on key nodes in the system, thereby affecting system reliability [4]. In addition, the IPS has numerous subsystems, a large number of key nodes, and coupling relationships between nodes, which cannot be ignored in terms of system reliability. Therefore, system failures often exhibit significant dynamic accumulation and uncertainty, with distinct time-varying characteristics [5].
Traditional reliability analysis methods, such as Markov Chain (MC) [6,7,8] and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) [9,10], typically assume that system state transitions satisfy static probability or independent identically distributed conditions, are typically based on the assumption that system state transitions satisfy static probability or independent identically distributed conditions. This makes dynamic coupling failure mechanisms difficult to be characterized, leading to prediction results deviating from engineering reality. Therefore, building a time-varying reliability analysis method that combines dynamic modeling capabilities and computational feasibility has become a research hotspot in this field. Among them, the Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) has become an effective tool for dynamic reliability analysis due to its modeling ability for time-varying failure logic and bidirectional reasoning advantages, demonstrating potential in fault diagnosis and risk prediction [11].
The DBN algorithm is mainly divided into two categories: the Discrete Time Bayesian Network (DTBN) algorithm and the Continuous Time Bayesian Network (CTBN) algorithm. Posterior probability of the system at predetermined discrete time points is solved by DTBN through setting a Conditional Probability Table (CPT) and a Marginal Probability Table (MPT). However, with the continuous increase in system complexity, the computational burden of DTBN has sharply increased. In contrast, CTBN significantly reduces computation time in the continuous time domain by constructing analytical solutions of Probability Density Functions (PDFs) for nodes [12].
With the flourishing development of machine learning [13] and data mining [14] technologies, the application scope of DBN continues to expand. Guo et al. [15] proposed a dynamic system reliability modeling method based on DTBN to address the issue of common cause failures in the nuclear power plant control system, achieving precise control of reliability. Huang et al. [16] addressed the issue of dynamic reliability assessment of hierarchical multi-state systems when observation data are inaccurate and improved analysis accuracy by fusing multi-level evidence using Dempster’s rule within the DTBN framework. Wang et al. [17] established a dynamic reliability model for remote-controlled unmanned underwater vehicles under the combined effects of human and equipment factors, combining GO method, fault tree, and human factor analysis, further expanding the application scenarios of DTBN. Cheng et al. [18] proposed a dynamic reliability analysis method for the vehicle transmission system based on the direct conversion between DTBN and reliability block diagrams. Through sensitivity analysis, key subsystems were identified, providing a quantitative basis for system optimization. Wei et al. [19] converted the dynamic fault tree into a DTBN model and applied it to the dynamic time series reliability analysis of the main feedwater system of pressurized water reactors. The results showed that it is closer to the actual operating state than traditional methods and improves decision accuracy. However, as the number of nodes and time slices increases, the dimensionality of CPT&MPT increases exponentially [20], and the computational complexity also increases exponentially. CTBN provides a solution to this problem.
Computational complexity is greatly reduced by CTBN through establishing analytical solutions for each node’s PDF and obtaining posterior probabilities. Yang et al. [21] proposed a generalized CTBN model with dual state CPT for reliability analysis of mixed temporal and non-temporal events in wireless communication networks, effectively reducing the errors of discrete models. Yao et al. [22] proposed the CTBN method considering common cause failure, which uses a time series conditional probability table and impulse function sampling method to solve the overlapping problem of system dynamic failure and correlation. The model’s analysis accuracy under long task times is verified to be better than traditional methods through examples. Although DBN has demonstrated many advantages, there are still shortcomings in the dynamic description of continuous degradation processes in the field of time-varying reliability analysis of the complex equipment system [23,24], as well as the high dependence of parameter learning on prior assumptions [25,26].
In response to the above issues, an improved DBN time-varying reliability analysis framework is proposed in this paper, which embeds a multi-physics coupling degradation model into the DBN node conditional probability, eliminates the limitation of discrete time points, dynamically fuses multi-source heterogeneous data, and provides support for the dynamic reliability analysis and health management of warship integrated electric propulsion system.
This section introduces the purpose and significance of the study and reviews previous research related to this study. Section 2 introduces the construction process of a multi-physics coupled degradation model. Section 3 conducted a system-level decomposition and node definition for the IPS, demonstrating the logical relationships. In Section 4, a DBN model for the IPS was constructed by setting dynamic evolution rules and time slicing, combined with the generation of conditional probability tables. Section 5 uses the method proposed in this article to conduct experimental verification of a certain case, obtain the reliability variation law, and verify the effectiveness of the method through comparison. Finally, Section 6 presents the conclusion and future research directions.

2. Multi-Physics Coupling Degradation Model

2.1. Model Description and Basic Assumptions

Research on the time-varying reliability of the IPS requires an accurate understanding of the physical characteristics, environmental factors, system hierarchy, and interaction relationships of key components. But in order to apply the model to practical engineering problems with sufficient accuracy, parameter abstraction and model assumptions need to be made. The following assumptions can be made:
1.
Continuous degradation: The degradation of equipment performance X t is a right-continuous random process that satisfies lim h 0 + X t + h = X t and lim h 0 + X t h exists;
2.
Interference randomness: The random interference events caused by SOC switching follow a Poisson process, and the degradation amplitude J k follows a normal distribution;
3.
Stress independence: The continuous degradation process, random interference events N t , and random noise Y t are independent of each other, and the coupled effects on degradation are linearly superimposed;
4.
Temperature vibration coupling: There is a coupling relationship between temperature T t and vibration stress S t .

2.2. Model Construction

2.2.1. Continuous Degradation Term

According to reference [27], temperature changes accelerate the degradation of system components to a certain extent. Therefore, based on the Arrhenius equation, the time-varying degradation rate caused by temperature can be expressed as follows:
μ T t = A 1 e E a K B T t
where A 1 is the temperature stress acceleration coefficient, which is usually fitted by constant temperature tests; E a is apparent activation energy; K B is the Boltzmann constant; T t is the thermodynamic temperature of the environment at a given moment t .
Vibration stress induces material fatigue damage accumulation and structural dynamic response mismatch, leading to microcrack initiation and propagation, resulting in natural frequency shift and modal parameter degradation of key components, significantly affecting system reliability [28].
According to reference [29], based on Miner’s linear cumulative damage theory, the time-varying degradation rate caused by vibration stress can be expressed as follows:
μ S t = A 2 1 t 0 t S 2 t d t
where A 2 is the vibration stress sensitivity coefficient, usually calibrated by experiments; 0 t S 2 t d t is the accumulated vibration energy from time 0 to t .

2.2.2. Random Interference Term

According to the basic assumption, the interference events caused by the switching of SOC are random. Therefore, the degradation caused by the switching of SOC can be described by a composite Poisson process:
J t = k = 1 N t J k
where N t represents the number of SOC switching occurrences within time 0 , t and obeys the Poisson distribution N t P λ t ; J k represents the degradation amplitude of the k th time SOC switch and obeys the normal distribution J k N μ j , σ j 2 .

2.2.3. Random Noise Term

To describe small disturbances that have not been explicitly modeled, such as measurement errors and manufacturing defects, a random noise term is introduced, and the resulting degradation can be expressed as follows:
Y t = σ W t
where σ is the diffusion coefficient; W t is the standard Wiener process; d W t is the increment of the standard Wiener process, following a normal distribution with a mean of 0 and a variance of d t , namely, d W t N 0 , d t .

2.2.4. Coupled Degradation Model

In order to consider the coupling effect of temperature vibration, quantify the synergistic amplification effect of vibration stress on thermal damage rate, and describe the nonlinear modulation effect of temperature on the cumulative rate of vibration damage, it is necessary to modify Equations (1) and (2).
Therefore, Equation (1) can be expressed as follows:
μ T t = A 1 e E a K B T t · 1 + α rms S t
where α is the vibration enhancement coefficient, which is usually obtained by measuring the growth rate of μ at different S t values through vibration temperature dual-stress acceleration tests.
Equation (2) can be expressed as follows:
μ S t = A 2 1 t 0 t S 2 t e β T t d t
where β is the temperature modulation coefficient, which is obtained by changing the temperature under constant amplitude vibration and fitting the slope of the ln μ S vs .   T curve.
By linearly superimposing the continuous degradation term, random interference term, and random noise term and expressing them in the form of stochastic differential equations, the multi-physics coupled degradation model can be obtained as follows:
d X t = μ t d t + σ d W t + d J t

3. System-Level Decomposition and Node Definition

The first step in DBN modeling is to clarify the hierarchical structure, node definitions, and dynamic coupling relationships of the IPS [21]. This section proposes a four-layer decomposition integration framework based on a multi-physics coupled degradation model to support the requirements of time-varying reliability analysis.
A typical complex equipment system can be decomposed into the following four levels:
1.
Environment Layer (EL)
External dynamic input variables E t , including temperature stress sequence T t and vibration stress sequence S t .
2.
Component Layer (CL)
Contains a set of basic functional units C = C 1 , C 2 , , C m ,   i 1 , m , and the degradation process of each component C i is driven by a multi-physics coupled degradation model.
3.
Subsystem Layer (SL)
The set S k = S k 1 , S k 2 , , S k n ,   j 1 , n containing n components and functionality associated, whose reliability logic is determined by the architecture:
R S k t = Ψ k R k 1 t , R k 2 t ,
where series subsystem Ψ k = R k i t ; parallel subsystem Ψ k = 1 1 R k i t .
4.
System Layer (SysL)
Global reliability is defined jointly by the subsystem:
R Sys t = Φ R S 1 t , R S 2 t ,
where Φ · is the mapping function, used to describe the significant nonlinear relationship between degradation X t and reliability R t .
Using an improved logistic function as the mapping function:
Φ X t = 1 1 + exp γ X t X t h + δ γ
where X t h is the failure threshold, defined as the critical value of degradation, calibrated through historical data. γ is the curvature parameter that controls the rate of reliability decay. δ is the offset parameter, which modifies the symmetry of the function to adapt to the asymmetric degradation process. γ and δ can be calibrated based on historical failure data using maximum likelihood estimation.
Therefore, the hierarchical structure of the system is shown in Figure 1.
Based on system-level decomposition, DBN nodes can be divided into three categories, as shown in Table 1.

4. Construction of DBN

4.1. Time Slice Design and Dynamic Evolution Rules

To accurately characterize the time-varying reliability of a warship’s integrated electric propulsion system using dynamic Bayesian networks, it is necessary to systematically construct time-slice design criteria and dynamic evolution rules from the time dimension.
To ensure that the increment of degradation X t within Δ t does not exceed the failure threshold, thereby maintaining the smoothness of the degradation process. Therefore, based on Equation (7), the upper bound of time slicing Δ t is determined and expressed as follows:
Δ t X t h X 0 max μ T t , μ S t
At the same time, in order to achieve a computable expression of the continuous degradation process, X t need to be discretized into m state intervals (such as normal, slight degradation, failure), whose boundaries are calibrated by historical data quantiles. The discretization process needs to balance the physical meaning and computational efficiency of state partitioning, ensuring a smooth transition of probability distributions between adjacent states.
The dynamic evolution rules unify the representation of multi-source uncertainty through the modeling of composite degradation processes. In DBN, the state evolution of degraded nodes satisfies Markov properties, namely:
P X t + 1 | X t , X t 1 , , X 0 = P X t + 1 | X t
So, the evolution of degradation includes continuous degradation terms, random interference terms, and noise terms. The evolution process can be represented by the joint distribution of independent random processes, that is:
P X i t + 1 | X i t , E j t = N X i t + μ t Δ t , σ 2 Δ t C P λ Δ t ,   N μ J , σ J 2
where N represents the joint normal distribution of the continuous degradation term and random noise term, C P term represents the composite Poisson process of the random interference term, and represents the convolution operation of the two.

4.2. Generation and Update of Conditional Probability Table

The multi-physics coupled degradation model is a complex nonlinear model, and it is difficult to obtain conditional probabilities through analytical solutions. Therefore, the MCS method is introduced to achieve refined modeling.
First, discretize Equation (7) into a recursive form with a time step of Δ t , expressed as follows:
X i l + 1 = X i l + μ t l Δ t + σ Δ t · ε + k = 1 K J k
where μ t l = μ T t l + μ S t l is the degradation rate at the current moment. ε N 0 , 1 is the standard normal distribution noise. K P λ Δ t , is the number of random interferences within Δ t .
Then, generate a degradation trajectory, as shown in Figure 2.
Finally, calculate the probability of state transition. After generating N trajectories, calculate the frequency of the degradation amount X i l + 1 falling into each state Z interval at the next moment, and normalize it to obtain the conditional probability:
P X i l + 1 = Z n | X i l = Z m , T l , S l = count X i l + 1 Z n N
To achieve online parameter updates and dynamic adjustment of CPT, the Particle Filter (PL) is introduced. The core process can be decomposed into the following steps [30]:
  • Particle Initialization
Extract M particles θ 0 m m = 1 M from the prior distribution P θ 0 , each particle represents the possible values of the degradation model parameter θ , and these are μ T , μ S , σ , λ , μ j , σ j . The initial weights of all particles are set to w 0 m = 1 / M , indicating that the initial credibility of each parameter is consistent.
2.
State Prediction
Generate degradation trajectories for each particle θ m through a Monte Carlo simulation.
3.
Weight Update
After obtaining real-time observation data Y l + 1 , it is necessary to adjust the weights of each particle to reflect its degree of matching with the real state. The weight update equation is as follows:
w l + 1 m w l m · exp Y l + 1 X i l + 1 , m 2 2 σ Y 2 · μ d λ m
where represents that the new weight is proportional to the right-hand equation. exp ( · ) is the Gaussian likelihood function of the observed data, used to quantify the deviation between the predicted degradation X and the measured value Y . σ Y 2 is the variance of observation data errors. μ d λ m is a fuzzy membership function introduced for maintaining records and modify the parameter distribution through implicit knowledge, to achieve the fusion of observation data and maintenance data. The fuzzy membership function can be expressed as follows:
μ d λ m = exp λ m k / τ 2 2 ε 2
where k is the maintenance frequency within the time window τ ; ε is the tolerance for ambiguity, and the larger the value of ε , the more deviation of λ m from the expected value is allowed.
Realize the fusion weight adjustment of observation data and maintenance knowledge through Equations (16) and (17). As shown in Figure 3, this process can effectively track the SOC switching frequency of PMSM.
4.
Resampling
To avoid the degradation of particle weights (i.e., most particle weights tend to zero), resampling operations need to be performed. To ensure that the starting point of each sampling is different and evenly covers the entire weight distribution, it is necessary to first generate uniformly distributed random numbers u 1 = U 0 , 1 / M , then construct a sequence u k = u 1 + k 1 / M , k = 1 , 2 , , M , and then select high-weight particles for replication based on the cumulative weight distribution, eliminating low-weight particles, thereby ensuring that the total number of particles remains unchanged while improving the accuracy of parameter estimation.
5.
Parameter Estimation
By fusing all particle information through a weighted average, calculate the posterior estimation parameters as follows:
θ ^ l + 1 = m = 1 M w l + 1 m θ l + 1 m
Based on the updated particle set, the state transition frequency of the degraded trajectory is recalculated, normalized to generate a new CPT, and fed back to the DBN to complete the model iteration. Adopting an adaptive dual-mode update strategy to balance computational efficiency and tracking accuracy, with a time step of 0.1 h.
  • Regular update mechanism
The structural parameters that characterize the long-term degradation trend are updated regularly every 50 steps.
  • Event triggering mechanism
Real-time response updates are performed on transient parameters that are sensitive to operating conditions, and parameter re-estimation is completed within 2 steps to capture dynamic changes.
This dual-mode update mechanism, based on parameter characteristics and system state, not only ensures the dynamic tracking ability of key degradation processes but also optimizes resource allocation.
The pseudocode of the particle filter algorithm is as follows (Algorithm 1):
Algorithm 1 Particle Filter for CPT Adjustment [30]
Input: Prior distribution P θ 0 , Observations Y , Maintenance parameters k , τ , ε , Particle count M
Output: Posterior estimate θ ^ , Updated CPT
1: Initialize particles:
  for m = 1 to M :
     θ 0 m ~ P θ 0     //   μ T , μ S , σ , λ , μ j , σ j
     w 0 m = 1 / M
2: for each time step t = 1 to T :
3:  // State prediction
4:  for each particle m :
5:     X t m ← MCS θ t 1 m     //  Degradation trajectory
6:  // Weight update
7:  for each particle m :
8:     L = exp Y t X t m 2 / 2 σ i 2     //  Gaussian likelihood (Equation (16))
9:     μ d = exp λ m k / τ 2 / 2 ε 2     //  Fuzzy fusion (Equation (17))
10:    w t m w t 1 m · L · μ d         // Weight update (Equation (16))
11:  Normalize weights: w t m = 1
12:  // Resampling
13:   u 1 ∼ Uniform [0, 1/ M ]
14:  for k = 1 to M :
15:      u k = u 1 + k 1 / M
16:     Select particle with cumulative weight > u k
17:     Reset w t m = 1 / M
18:  // Parameter estimation
19:   θ ^ l + 1 = m = 1 M w l + 1 m θ l + 1 m    // Posterior estimate (Equation (18))
20:  // CPT update
21:  Calculate state transition frequency
22:  Normalize → New CPT
23:  Update DBN model
24: end for

5. Case Study

5.1. Case Background and Experimental Design

In order to evaluate the time-varying reliability analysis method proposed in this study, the IPS used in a certain type of warship is taken as an example. The system includes key subsystems such as power generation, transmission and distribution, and propulsion system. It is greatly affected by temperature and vibration and has the characteristics of multi-physical field coupling degradation. There is also a switching of SOC under different power requirements, which meets the complexity requirements of time-varying reliability analysis. The composition structure is shown in Figure 4.
The IPS comprises four mission-critical subsystems working in concert to generate, distribute, manage, and utilize electrical energy. The power generation system converts mechanical energy from prime movers into electrical power via generators, with governors ensuring stable frequency output. This electricity is routed through the power transmission and distribution system—the central power backbone operating at medium-to-high-voltage levels (typically 4 kV–15 kV DC/AC). This subsystem employs distribution panelboards for load allocation, circuit-breakers for millisecond-level fault protection, and transformers for voltage conversion, collectively minimizing ohmic losses during ship-wide power transfer. Simultaneously, the energy management system monitors operational parameters via data acquisition units and dynamically optimizes energy flow through predictive control modules. Finally, the propulsion system transforms this regulated electrical energy into thrust via permanent magnet synchronous motors, which are driven by IGBT-based frequency converters and transfer torque through transmission shafting to high-efficiency screw propellers [4,5].
According to the structural diagram of the IPS, its DBN can be constructed as shown in Figure 5, and the node numbers are shown in Table 2.
For the convenience of discussion, taking the permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) component in the system as an example, the degradation model parameters are set as shown in Table 3. Environmental loads, random interference, and noise caused by SOC switching are monitored. After inputting DBN-related parameters, the model is solved to obtain the time-varying reliability curve of PMSM.
The following four steps are followed to solve and then referred to other components. The time-varying reliability curve of the IPS can ultimately be obtained.
  • Data preprocessing
Integrating real-time monitoring data (temperature, vibration spectrum) with maintenance records, calibrating the initial degradation state X 0 , and removing abnormal data points.
Monitor temperature data through K-type thermocouples (accuracy ± 0.5 °C) on the stator winding of permanent magnet synchronous motors, and monitor vibration data through ICP accelerometers (0.5–5 kHz frequency response) at a sampling rate of 10 kHz. Select temperature and vibration stress data of the permanent magnet synchronous motor within a certain task cycle, as shown in Figure 6.
From Figure 6, it can be seen that within the 10 h task cycle, the PMSM power is low within 0–1 h, normal power within 1–6 h, and system failure due to external impact at 6 h, resulting in a sudden increase in temperature and vibration stress. To clearly indicate the impact stage, highlight it in pink line in the figure. After troubleshooting, the vibration stress immediately returns to the normal range, and the temperature gradually returns to the normal range. The magnified image of the impact phase is shown in Figure 7.
In the actual operation of IPS, sensors will monitor a large amount of data, but these data are multi-source and heterogeneous, and there is a large amount of invalid data. After data cleaning, it is difficult to support subsequent reliability analysis. Therefore, it is necessary to combine historical operational data of the system. The Bayesian estimation method can obtain more accurate estimates through maximum a posteriori estimation by integrating population information, prior information, and sample information, significantly improving the accuracy of reliability analysis. In practical operation, acceleration test data, expert experience, and historical databases can be integrated as prior information, and real-time monitoring data can be used as sample information.
Due to the coupling effect of temperature and vibration stress in characterizing degradation, it is necessary to consider the synergistic amplification effect of vibration stress on thermal damage rate and the nonlinear modulation effect of temperature on vibration damage rate. Based on the temperature vibration data during the PMSM task period, the degradation rate variation law is obtained by linearly superimposing random interference terms and random noise terms, as shown in Figure 8.
The degradation amount is the accumulation of the degradation rate over time, obtained by integrating the degradation rate. Therefore, the degradation variation curve can be obtained, as shown in Figure 9.
From Figure 9, it can be seen that the overall degradation amount shows a slightly fluctuating upward trend, and the incremental degradation amount is also clearly segmented at different stages, such as low power, normal power, and under impact in PMSM. At low power, the temperature and vibration stress are relatively low, and the degradation caused is not significant. After being impacted, there is a significant increase in temperature, vibration stress, and degradation.
2.
Dynamic evolutionary simulation
Generate degradation trajectories based on Equation (14) and update environmental nodes E t synchronously; dynamically adjust model parameters θ and update CPT through particle filtering.
3.
Reliability calculation
According to the logistic mapping function of Equation (10), convert the degradation X t into subsystem and global reliability R t .
4.
Validation design
Compare the prediction error of traditional Static Bayesian Networks (SBNs) with the method proposed in this paper and validate the advantages of the proposed model.

5.2. Result Analysis

By running custom code in MATLAB R2023a software and following the above steps to calculate the reliability of components and subsystems, the variation pattern of the IPS reliability is finally obtained, as shown in Figure 10.
As shown in Figure 10, the time-varying reliability evolution process of the IPS can be divided into three stages:
  • Initial Stable Stage (0–1000 h)
The system maintains an ideal reliability ( R Sys = 1 ), indicating that the IPS has complete reliability characteristics in the initial stage of operation, which conforms to the typical “bathtub curve” initial stable stage of engineering systems.
2.
Initial degradation stage (1000–1200 h)
As can be seen from the magnified local image, the system has entered the initial degradation stage, and the reliability shows a linear decay trend, with a cumulative reliability loss of Δ R Sys = 1.3 % This stage conforms to the early failure characteristics described by the Weibull distribution.
3.
Accelerated Failure Stage (>1200 h)
At this stage, the system exhibits nonlinear accelerated degradation characteristics, with a significant increase in the rate of reliability degradation and a clear change in curvature indicating the existence of a multi-factor coupled failure mechanism. After 1800 h, due to the saturation of microcrack propagation inside the material, further degradation requires higher energy input, resulting in a gradual trend at the end of the accelerated failure stage.
To verify the adequacy of the multi-physics coupled degradation model, this study used the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test method for statistical verification: Empirical distribution analysis was conducted on 105 degradation trajectories generated by Monte Carlo simulation and compared with the theoretical distribution based on Equation (7). The test results at the 2000 h task endpoint (t = 2000 h) showed that the K-S statistic calculated p = 0.18 (greater than the significance level of 0.05), indicating that there is no significant deviation between the simulated distribution and the theoretical distribution (the null hypothesis H0 cannot be rejected at the α = 0.05 level). This result statistically confirms that the model can accurately capture the intrinsic coupling mechanism of multi-physics field degradation.
In order to evaluate the performance differences between the proposed DBN method and SBN, MCS, and MC in long-term system operation, Figure 11 shows the comparison results of the system reliability of the four methods within 1400–2000 h. The stability and robustness characteristics of the four methods can be intuitively compared through the curve variation pattern. Table 4 compares the performance and root mean square error (RMSE) of four methods in actual operation.
As shown in Figure 11, the overall decreasing trend of R Sys for the four methods is similar, showing a trend of slow first, then fast, and then slow again. The curve solved by the Proposed DBN is located in the middle of the other three methods, which preliminarily indicates the feasibility of the method. To further quantify the comparison, as shown in Table 4, RMSE vs. MCS was used to represent the root mean square error of the other three methods relative to MCS. The results further showed that the average error between Proposed DBN and MCS was 1.64%, while SBN’s was 3.92% and MC’s was 5.17%. This ratio further validates the feasibility and correctness of the Proposed DBN method in this paper. Meanwhile, although the computation time of the Proposed DBN is higher than SBN and MC, it is significantly lower than MCS and within an acceptable range.
To evaluate the impact of each subsystem on the global reliability of the IPS, Figure 12 visually presents the sensitivity levels of the AF, BF, CF, and DF subsystems through sensitivity analysis.
Analysis shows that the DF subsystem has a decisive impact on the global reliability of the IPS, with a sensitivity value 11.8% higher than the second-ranked AF, highlighting its critical role in system reliability. The main reasons for the highest sensitivity of DF are as follows: The terminal nature of the load makes it a stress convergence point, the multi-field coupling catalyzes an increase in damage index, and the topological criticality amplifies the consequences of failure. BF and CF exhibit moderate and low sensitivity characteristics, respectively, forming significant gradient differences, which is consistent with the redundancy setting in engineering practice. This further validates the superiority of the multi-factor coupling analysis method proposed in this paper.

6. Conclusions

A time-varying reliability analysis framework based on dynamic Bayesian networks is proposed in this study. By embedding a multi-physics coupled degradation model into the conditional probability nodes of DBN, a joint stochastic differential equation for the degradation process is constructed, achieving dynamic correlation between continuous degradation and discrete fault events. The improved modeling method for continuous degradation systems effectively solves the numerical stability problem of complex degradation systems, and the effectiveness of the model is verified through numerical simulations and case studies. Taking a certain type of ship’s IPS as an example, the influence of temperature vibration coupling stress and system operating condition switching on reliability was quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that this method can accurately capture the three-stage evolution law of system reliability (initial stability, linear regression, accelerated failure), which is highly consistent with the characteristics of the “bathtub curve” in engineering practice. Compared with SBN and MC, its root mean square error relative to MCS is the smallest, and the sensitivity of the propulsion subsystem (DF) is 11.8% higher than other subsystems, which is consistent with engineering redundancy design practices. The dynamic fusion of multi-source heterogeneous data has been achieved through a particle filtering algorithm, which supports online updating of model parameters and significantly improves the prediction robustness under extreme working conditions. The research results provide theoretical support for the dynamic health management of complex equipment systems, and their universal design can be extended to fields such as energy and transportation.
In future research, deep learning-driven degradation failure coupling modeling and cross-scale correlation mechanisms can be further explored to enhance predictive adaptability under non-stationary conditions. Meanwhile, the universality of the verification method can be considered for applications in different fields, such as hydropower plant power systems and mine power supply systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W. and T.C.; data curation, H.W.; formal analysis, J.W.; investigation, H.L.; methodology, J.W.; project administration, T.C. and H.W.; resources, T.C.; software, J.W. and H.L.; supervision, H.L.; validation, J.W., T.C. and H.W.; visualization, H.W.; writing—original draft, J.W.; writing—review and editing, T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Nomenclature

Symbol
X t Performance degradation sequence (dimensionless)
T t Temperature stress sequence (K)
S t Vibration stress sequence (m/s2)
N t Random interference process
Y t Random noise process
A 1 Temperature stress acceleration coefficient (h−1)
E a Apparent activation energy (eV)
K B Boltzmann constant (J/K)
A 2 Vibration stress sensitivity coefficient ((m/s2)−1·h−1/2)
J k Degradation amplitude (dimensionless)
C Component layer collection
S k Subsystem layer components collection
X t h Failure threshold (dimensionless)
Δ t Time slicing (h)
K Random interference frequency
Greek
σ Diffusion coefficient (h−1/2)
α Vibration enhancement coefficient ((m/s2)−1)
β Temperature modulation coefficient (K−1)
Φ Mapping function
γ Curvature parameter (dimensionless)
δ Offset parameter (dimensionless)
ε Tolerance for ambiguity (dimensionless)
λ SOC switching frequency (h−1)
Abbreviations
IPSIntegrated Power System
SOCSystem Operating Condition
MCMarkov Chain
MCSMonte Carlo Simulation
DBNDynamic Bayesian Network
DTBNDiscrete Time Bayesian Network
CTBNContinuous Time Bayesian Network
CPTConditional Probability Table
MPTMarginal Probability Table
PDFsProbability Density Functions
CLComponent Layer
SLSubsystem Layer
SysLSystem Layer
ELEnvironment Layer
PLParticle Filter
SBNsStatic Bayesian Networks

References

  1. Fang, Z.G. Complex Equipment System Digital Twin; China Machine Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wan, Z.B.; Hu, J.G.; Li, J.J.; Chen, L.; Mao, Y.K.; Ye, M.Y. Effectiveness Evaluation of Land-based Intelligent Unmanned Combat Systems Based on Graph Convolutional Networks. Acta Armamentarii 2024, 45, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gao, Q.; Lu, L.H.; Zhang, R.; Song, L.Y.; Huo, D.H.; Wang, G.L. Investigation on the thermal behavior of an aerostatic spindle system considering multi-physics coupling effect. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 102, 3813–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Z.; Hu, Z.Y.; Yang, X.F. Multi-agent and ant colony optimization for ship integrated power system network reconfiguration. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 2022, 33, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vizentin, G.; Vukelic, G.; Murawski, L.; Recho, N.; Oeovic, J. Marine Propulsion System Failures-A Review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pan, X.L.; Chen, H.X.; Shen, A.; Zhao, D.D.; Su, X.Y. A Reliability Assessment Method for Complex Systems Based on Non-Homogeneous Markov Processes. Sensors 2024, 24, 3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kou, L.L.; Chu, B.Q.; Chen, Y.; Qin, y. An Automatic Partition Time-Varying Markov Model for Reliability Evaluation. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, X.; Wang, L.J. Reliability Assessment of Cyber-physical Distribution System Based on Continuous time Markov Chains. Guangdong Electr. Power 2023, 36, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shekhar, C.; Devanda, M.; Sharma, K. Reliability analysis of imperfect repair and switching failures: A Bayesian inference and Monte Carlo simulation approach. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2025, 461, 116–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruan, Y.P.; He, Z. Reliability evaluation of complex systems with common cause failures based on dbn-CA. Syst. Eng. Electron. 2013, 35, 900–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, C.; Guo, Y.J.; Zhong, M.J.; Liang, X.F.; Wang, H.D.; Yi, H. Reliability analysis based on dynamic Bayesian networks: A case study of an unmanned surface vessel. Ocean. Eng. 2021, 240, 3514–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, X.; Huang, H.Z.; Huang, P.; Li, Y.F. Reliability Analysis and Fault Diagnosis for Power System via Dynamic Bayesian Network. J. Univ. Electron. Sci. Technol. China 2021, 50, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, C.G.; Huang, H.Z.; Li, Y.F. A bidirectional LSTM prognostics method under multiple operational conditions. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 66, 8792–8802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peng, W.W.; Li, Y.F.; Yang, Y.J.; Mi, J.H.; Huang, H.Z. Bayesian degradation analysis with inverse Gaussian process models under time-varying degradation rates. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2017, 66, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, Y.J.; Zhong, M.J.; Gao, C.; Wang, H.D.; Liang, X.F.; Yi, H. A discrete-time Bayesian network approach for reliability analysis of dynamic systems with common cause failures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 216, 1208–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, T.D.; Xiahou, T.F.; Mi, J.H.; Chen, H.; Huang, H.Z.; Liu, Y. Merging multi-level evidential observations for dynamic reliability assessment of hierarchical multi-state systems: A dynamic Bayesian network approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2024, 249, 1492–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, C.; Yuan, S.; Yu, C.; Deng, X.; Chen, Q.F.; Ren, L. Operational reliability analysis of remote operated vehicle based on dynamic Bayesian network synthesis method. J. Risk Reliab. 2025, 239, 162–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, T.T.; Fan, D.Q.; Liu, X.T.; Wang, J.G. Reliability analysis for manufacturing system of drive shaft based on dynamic Bayesian network. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2024, 40, 4482–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, W.T.; Li, M.F.; Zhu, D.H.; Zhong, M.J.; Guo, Y.J.; Du, Z.Y.; Jiang, X.W. Research on Reliability Evaluation Method of Nuclear Energy System Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network. Nucl. Power Eng. 2023, 44, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Li, Y.F.; Li, H.; Huang, H.Z. An algorithm of discrete-time Bayesian network for reliability analysis of multilevel system with warm spare gate. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2020, 37, 1116–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, S.Q.; Zeng, Y.; Li, X.; Li, Y.F.; Huang, H.Z. Reliability analysis for wireless communication networks via dynamic Bayesian network. J. Syst. Eng. Electron. 2023, 34, 1368–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yao, C.Y.; Han, D.D.; Chen, D.N.; Liu, Y.M. A novel continuous-time dynamic Bayesian network reliability analysis method considering common cause failure. Chin. J. Sci. Instrum. 2022, 43, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tao, H.H.; Jia, P.; Wang, X.Y.; Wang, L.Q. Reliability analysis of subsea control module based on dynamic Bayesian network and digital twin. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2024, 248, 1201–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hongseok, K.; Dooyoul, L. An efficient discretization scheme for a dynamic Bayesian network in structural reliability analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 2024, 238, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Y.D.; Wang, S.P.; Zio, E.; Zhang, C.; Dui, H.Y.; Chen, R.T. Model-guided system operational reliability assessment based on gradient boosting decision trees and dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2025, 259, 348–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Y.Y.; Qian, L.X.; Hong, M.; Li, D.Y. Navigation risk assessment for ocean-going ships in the north pacific ocean based on an improved dynamic Bayesian network model. Ocean. Eng. 2025, 315, 1198–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dania, B.H.; Raed, A.; Mohammed, A.; Sa, H. Reliability modeling of the fatigue life of lead-free solder joints at different testing temperatures and load levels using the Arrhenius model. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2493–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qu, X.Z. Time-varying reliability analysis of stochastic process discretization method for train traction power impeller vibration. J. Vib. Shock. 2024, 43, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weber, F.; Wu, H.R.; Starke, P. A new short-time procedure for fatigue life evaluation based on the linear damage accumulation by Palmgren–Miner. Int. J. Fatigue 2023, 172, 1352–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yan, X.J.; Zhu, H.M.; Sun, S.Y.; Shi, Z.S.; Jiang, S. A UAV Target Positioning Method Based on Improved Mutant Firefly Algorithm Optimized Particle Filter. Acta Armamentarii 2025, 46, 250459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. System hierarchical structure.
Figure 1. System hierarchical structure.
Systems 13 00541 g001
Figure 2. Monte Carlo simulation process.
Figure 2. Monte Carlo simulation process.
Systems 13 00541 g002
Figure 3. Particle filter tracking effect of λ parameter over time steps.
Figure 3. Particle filter tracking effect of λ parameter over time steps.
Systems 13 00541 g003
Figure 4. Structural diagram of the IPS.
Figure 4. Structural diagram of the IPS.
Systems 13 00541 g004
Figure 5. DBN of the IPS.
Figure 5. DBN of the IPS.
Systems 13 00541 g005
Figure 6. Temperature vibration characteristic curve during PMSM task cycle.
Figure 6. Temperature vibration characteristic curve during PMSM task cycle.
Systems 13 00541 g006
Figure 7. Temperature vibration characteristic curve during the impact phase.
Figure 7. Temperature vibration characteristic curve during the impact phase.
Systems 13 00541 g007
Figure 8. Degradation rate of PMSM under temperature vibration coupling.
Figure 8. Degradation rate of PMSM under temperature vibration coupling.
Systems 13 00541 g008
Figure 9. Degradation change curve of PMSM.
Figure 9. Degradation change curve of PMSM.
Systems 13 00541 g009
Figure 10. The IPS reliability variation curve.
Figure 10. The IPS reliability variation curve.
Systems 13 00541 g010
Figure 11. Comparative analysis of reliability.
Figure 11. Comparative analysis of reliability.
Systems 13 00541 g011
Figure 12. Sensitivity analysis of subsystems.
Figure 12. Sensitivity analysis of subsystems.
Systems 13 00541 g012
Table 1. Node classification.
Table 1. Node classification.
Node TypeSymbolic RepresentationVariable Definition
Degenerate nodes X i t Degradation of components C i
Environmental nodes E j t Environment variable
Reliability nodes R k t Reliability of the system
Table 2. Node number.
Table 2. Node number.
Node NumberNameNode NumberName
SFIPSB2Circuit-breaker
AFPower generation system B3Transformer
BFPower transmission and distribution system C1Data acquisition unit
CFEnergy management system C2Control module
DFPropulsion system D1Permanent magnet synchronous motor
A1Prime mover D2Frequency converter
A2Generator D3Transmission shafting
A3Governor D4Screw propeller
B1Distribution panelboard
Table 3. Multi-physics coupled degradation model parameters for PMSM.
Table 3. Multi-physics coupled degradation model parameters for PMSM.
ParameterPhysical MeaningUnitValue RangeCalibration and Verification
A 1 Temperature stress acceleration coefficienth−12.5×10−4 ± 0.3×10−480 °C constant-temperature accel-erated aging tests [27]
A 2 Vibration stress sensitivity coefficient(m/s2)−1·h−1/21.2×10−3 ± 0.2×10−3Vibration table acceleration test (100 Hz sine vibration)
E a Apparent activation energyeV0.45 ± 0.05Material properties of NdFeB magnets [27]
α Vibration enhancement coefficient(m/s2)−10.15 ± 0.03Dual-stress accelerated tests (100 Hz vibration platform)
β Temperature modulation coefficientK−10.08 ± 0.01Variable-temperature vibration tests (20–120 °C)
σ Diffusion coefficienth−1/20.015 ± 0.002Factory test data (100-unit sample)
λ SOC switching frequencyh−10.06 ± 0.01Warship power system operation logs
μ j Mean degradation amplitude from transient load shocksDimensionless0.02 ± 0.005Sudden load test data [4]
σ j Standard deviation of transient load degradationDimensionless0.003 ± 0.001Failure event statistics
X t h Failure threshold (15% efficiency drop)Dimensionless0.25 ± 0.03Historical maintenance records (200 failure cases)
Table 4. Performance comparison of four methods.
Table 4. Performance comparison of four methods.
MethodRun Time (s)RMSE vs. MCS
Proposed DBN15.200.0164
MCS85.720.0000
SBN9.540.0392
MC11.370.0517
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, J.; Chen, T.; Wen, H.; Liu, H. Time-Varying Reliability Analysis of Integrated Power System Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network. Systems 2025, 13, 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070541

AMA Style

Wei J, Chen T, Wen H, Liu H. Time-Varying Reliability Analysis of Integrated Power System Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network. Systems. 2025; 13(7):541. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Jiacheng, Tong Chen, Haolin Wen, and Haobang Liu. 2025. "Time-Varying Reliability Analysis of Integrated Power System Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network" Systems 13, no. 7: 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070541

APA Style

Wei, J., Chen, T., Wen, H., & Liu, H. (2025). Time-Varying Reliability Analysis of Integrated Power System Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network. Systems, 13(7), 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop