Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying Autonomy Levels of Traffic Signal Control Within Autonomous Traffic Systems Based on AHP–TOPSIS
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

A Systematic Review of the Need for Conceptual Models of Imagery Experiences

Department of Information Technologies in Industry, Faculty of Computer Systems and Technology, Technical University of Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2025, 13(12), 1051; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121051 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 September 2025 / Revised: 18 November 2025 / Accepted: 18 November 2025 / Published: 21 November 2025

Abstract

It is reasonable to argue that researching imagery experiences requires substantial use of conceptual modeling. Cognitive architectures have been used to explain cognitive phenomena like perception, action, and information gathering, and to model them in computational solutions. However, the question arises: Is there a lack of cognitive architectures or models that represent relational and classificatory knowledge of imagery experiences? This systematic review defines the concepts of cognitive architecture and cognitive model and examines how recent research relates the concepts to imagery experiences. A concept token research methodology is applied in search of keywords and key phrases that signify occurrences of targeted concepts. The methodology is viewed as a way to define a research area based on the concept of mental imagery and other related concepts that expand this area. The results demonstrate a significant and steady upward trend in publications from the research area in the last few years. The concepts of mental imagery and motor imagery emerged as the most regularly discussed, while others, such as imagery experiences, sensorimotor, mental model and active vision, were addressed rather rarely and thus represent new avenues for investigation.
Keywords: imagery experiences; cognitive model; cognitive architecture; conceptual design imagery experiences; cognitive model; cognitive architecture; conceptual design

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ukov, T.; Sharabov, M.; Tsochev, G. A Systematic Review of the Need for Conceptual Models of Imagery Experiences. Systems 2025, 13, 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121051

AMA Style

Ukov T, Sharabov M, Tsochev G. A Systematic Review of the Need for Conceptual Models of Imagery Experiences. Systems. 2025; 13(12):1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ukov, Teodor, Maksim Sharabov, and Georgi Tsochev. 2025. "A Systematic Review of the Need for Conceptual Models of Imagery Experiences" Systems 13, no. 12: 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121051

APA Style

Ukov, T., Sharabov, M., & Tsochev, G. (2025). A Systematic Review of the Need for Conceptual Models of Imagery Experiences. Systems, 13(12), 1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13121051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop