Previous Article in Journal
Knowledge Graph-Enabled Prediction of the Elderly’s Activity Types at Metro Trip Destinations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pit-Stop Manufacturing: Decision Support for Complexity and Uncertainty Management in Production Ramp-Up Planning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

How Does AI Transform Cyber Risk Management?

by
Sander Zeijlemaker
1,*,
Yaphet K. Lemiesa
1,
Saskia Laura Schröer
2,
Abhishta Abhishta
3 and
Michael Siegel
1
1
Cyber Security at MIT Sloan, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 245 First St., E94-1567, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
2
Data and Application Security, University of Liechtenstein, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse, 9490 Vaduz, Liechtenstein
3
Industrial Engineering and Business Information Systems, University of Twente, Ravelijn (Building No. 10), Room 3351, Hallenweg 17, 7522 NH Enschede, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2025, 13(10), 835; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100835
Submission received: 7 August 2025 / Revised: 3 September 2025 / Accepted: 11 September 2025 / Published: 23 September 2025

Abstract

Digital transformation embeds smart cities, e-health, and Industry 4.0 into critical infrastructures, thereby increasing reliance on digital systems and exposure to cyber threats and boosting complexity and dependency. Research involving over 200 executives reveals that under rising complexity, only 15% of cyber risk investments are effective, leaving most organizations misaligned or vulnerable. In this context, the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in cybersecurity requires systemic scrutiny. This study analyzes how AI reshapes systemic structures in cyber risk management through a multi-method approach: literature review, expert workshops with practitioners and policymakers, and a structured kill chain analysis of the Colonial Pipeline attack. The findings reveal three new feedback loops: (1) deceptive defense structures that misdirect adversaries while protecting assets, (2) two-step success-to-success attacks that disable defenses before targeting infrastructure, and (3) autonomous proliferation when AI applications go rogue. These dynamics shift cyber risk from linear patterns to adaptive, compounding interactions. The principal conclusion is that AI both amplifies and mitigates systemic risk. The core recommendation is to institutionalize deception in security standards and address drifting AI-powered systems. Deliverables include validated systemic structures, policy options, and a foundation for creating future simulation models to support strategic cyber risk management investment.
Keywords: cybersecurity; artificial intelligence; systemic structure change; qualitative modeling cybersecurity; artificial intelligence; systemic structure change; qualitative modeling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeijlemaker, S.; Lemiesa, Y.K.; Schröer, S.L.; Abhishta, A.; Siegel, M. How Does AI Transform Cyber Risk Management? Systems 2025, 13, 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100835

AMA Style

Zeijlemaker S, Lemiesa YK, Schröer SL, Abhishta A, Siegel M. How Does AI Transform Cyber Risk Management? Systems. 2025; 13(10):835. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100835

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeijlemaker, Sander, Yaphet K. Lemiesa, Saskia Laura Schröer, Abhishta Abhishta, and Michael Siegel. 2025. "How Does AI Transform Cyber Risk Management?" Systems 13, no. 10: 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100835

APA Style

Zeijlemaker, S., Lemiesa, Y. K., Schröer, S. L., Abhishta, A., & Siegel, M. (2025). How Does AI Transform Cyber Risk Management? Systems, 13(10), 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100835

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop