An Integrated Smart Manufacturing System for Customer Design Experience
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Excellence in Design and Smart Manufacturing Practices
2.2. Customer Design and Experience: A Key Competitive Advantage and Challenge in Smart Manufacturing
2.3. The Innovation Engine and Digital Transformation
3. Research Design and Conceptual Framework
3.1. Conceptual Framework
3.2. Setting System Objectives Using the DFX Methodology
3.3. Smart Integrated Systems Framework
4. Case Study Analysis
4.1. Operational Process before Implementation at the Case Company
4.2. Construction of Smart Production Integration System
4.2.1. Phase One: System Cabinet Modeling Logic
- (1)
- Over 10,000 online cabinet sizes are modeled, and dimensional parameters are set. This reduces the number of cabinet bodies to over 2000 standard units that can be adjusted according to size. These data are integrated into the custom drawing software to achieve custom drawing and ensure that production parameters are connected to manufacturing and assembly.
- (2)
- The system modeling supports flexible product design due to the varied custom order requirements, with the manufacturing system’s instant connection to smart production manufacturing.
- (3)
- All design links can be highly customized in real-time: designers, through different parameter settings and size adjustments, can dynamically generate virtual furniture. This is depicted in Figure 9.
- (4)
- The system instantly generates corresponding structural diagrams and related data reports, including material lists, hardware lists, cost accounting, hole positioning diagrams, and packaging list data linked to the production and manufacturing end for precise material arrangement and manufacturing.
4.2.2. Phase Two: Storefront Simulation Scenario Drawing Process for Production Operations (Figure 10)
- (1)
- A virtual reality (VR) is generated in real-time for the customer, allowing them to preview and experience the product design details and structural layout. The precise modeling and design enable customers to browse the physical installation scenarios of the products, as illustrated in Figure 11.
- (2)
- Through the storefront scenario drawing software, data are uploaded to the cloud at the storefront level, extending to the smart manufacturing system. The modeling operations directly interpret all product combinations, leading to the production of BOM tables, which then transition to smart manufacturing.
4.2.3. Phase Three: Smart Production Integration Operations as Depicted in Figure 12
- (1)
- Smart Production and Sales Order Verification: Production control personnel use the system to receive and review orders in real-time. Once the review is complete, optimal order scheduling is conducted using the Sakura system based on delivery deadlines, regions, etc. This is illustrated in Figure 13.
- (2)
- Order Decomposition: After automatic order breakdown, Artificial Intelligence (AI technology) is applied to compute the best order combination, automatically calculating the most optimal material production or the fastest production mode, as shown in Figure 14.
- (3)
- Automatic Material Requisition: Material requisition, usage forms, and processing orders with QR codes for the materials are automatically generated. Each processing station can simply scan the code to retrieve the material information and processing instructions, thereby enhancing production efficiency.
- (4)
- Smart Production Line and Intelligent Layout: With zero layout errors, there is a reduction in material waste and an increase in production efficiency. Processing machines can flexibly adjust processing based on the characteristics of the materials and custom requirements.
- (5)
- Process Optimization: The system helps to eliminate redundant production processes, reduce production loss and product anomalies, and enhance on-time delivery capabilities. The aim is to achieve manufacturing precision and further improve production efficiency.
- (6)
- Production Control: By managing the production process via the system, batch production replaces the past practice of single-set production. This streamlined process shortens product delivery times by 30%, reduces the error rate, and creates a new production and supply model.
5. Research Findings and Discussion
5.1. Research Results
- (1)
- Customized Design and Value of Customer Integrated Virtual and Physical Experience: Designers personally measure the actual dimensions of consumers’ kitchens and use a 3D design system to depict the future look of the kitchen based on family needs and habits. This integrated approach not only enhances the visual presentation but also significantly impacts key operational metrics in stores.
- Average Design Days: Prior to the implementation of the 3D design software, the average time required for design completion across stores was 9.52 days (SD = 3.73). After adopting the system, this time decreased to 8.47 days (SD = 3.82). The paired sample t-test showed a t-value of 6.86 and a highly significant p-value of 7.08 × 10−10 (p < 0.001), confirming a statistically significant improvement in design efficiency
- Customer Satisfaction: Similarly, the system’s impact on customer satisfaction was notable. Before the system’s implementation, the average satisfaction score was 5.60 (SD = 1.70), which increased to 6.89 (SD = 1.65) after implementation. A paired sample t-test yielded a t-value of −12.27 and a p-value of 2.63 × 10−21 (p < 0.001), demonstrating a significant enhancement in customer satisfaction.
- (2)
- Manufacturing Benefits of Automated Smart Production Integration System: With one-click ordering at the storefront, the manufacturing system groups orders based on order characteristics, schedules production, and automatically reviews and breaks down each order, calculating the best use of materials or the fastest production mode. The automatic generation of instructions, drawings, and documentation for machinery significantly improves production efficiency and reduces error rates.
- (3)
- Integrated System Benefits of Design, Production, and Quotation Capability: The system integrates production information to automatically calculate the materials, panels, parts used, instantly analyzes product quotes, and automates all operations, reducing manual order transfer, verification, and sales-production reconciliation.
- (4)
- Digital Transformation for Value Design: Differentiating from competitors, with realistic design outputs and in-store VR experiences, achieving design, production, and sales capabilities. Customers can experience their future kitchen directly in the store and proceed to purchase after the experience. For the system kitchen cabinet industry, this moves beyond price competition by offering home living proposals, enhancing industry value after digital transformation.
5.2. Research Contributions and Managerial Implications
5.3. Research Limitations and Future Research Suggestions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sun, X.; Ji, X. Integrated kitchen design and optimization based on the improved particle swarm intelligent algorithm. Comput. Intell. 2020, 36, 1638–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonova, A. Smart services as scenarios for digital transformation. Industry 4.0 2018, 3, 301–304. [Google Scholar]
- Bralla, J.G. Design for Excellence; McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Chiu, M.C.; Okudan, G.L.E. Evolution of design for X tools applicable to design stages: A literature review. In Proceedings of the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 15–18 August 2010; Volume 44144, pp. 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benabdellah, A.C.; Benghabrit, A.; Bouhaddou, I.; Benghabrit, O. Design for relevance concurrent engineering approach: Integration of IATF 16949 requirements and design for X techniques. Res. Eng. Des. 2020, 31, 323–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulrich, K.T.; Ellison, D.J. Holistic customer requirements and the design-select decision. Manag. Sci. 1999, 45, 641–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wechsler, J.; Schweitzer, J. Creating customer-centric organizations: The value of design artefacts. Des. J. 2019, 22, 505–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhavnani, R.; Sosa, M. IDEO: Service Design (A&B); INSEAD Case Study; INSEAD: Fontainebleau, France, 2006; Volume 11, pp. 2006–5276. [Google Scholar]
- Weiss, L. Developing tangible strategies. Des. Manag. J. Former Ser. 2002, 13, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.Y.M. Customer interface design for customer co-creation in the social era. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 73, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koomsap, P. Design by customer: Concept and applications. J. Intell. Manuf. 2013, 24, 295–311. [Google Scholar]
- Gentile, C.; Spiller, N.; Noci, G. How to sustain the customer experience: An overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. Eur. Manag. J. 2007, 25, 395–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoef, P.C.; Lemon, K.N.; Parasuraman, A.; Roggeveen, A.; Tsiros, M.; Schlesinger, L.A. Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics, and management strategies. J. Retail. 2009, 85, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gitman, L.J.; Carl, M.D. The Future of Business: The Essentials; South-Western College Publishing: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Jiao, J.R.; Zhang, Y.; Helander, M. A Kansei mining system for affective design. Expert Syst. Appl. 2006, 30, 658–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.; Li, P.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, B.; Zang, J.; Meng, L. Toward new-generation intelligent manufacturing. Engineering 2018, 4, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naiju, C.D. DFMA for product designers: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 7473–7478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoque, A.S.M.; Halder, P.K.; Parvez, M.S.; Szecsi, T. Integrated manufacturing features and Design-for-manufacture guidelines for reducing product cost under CAD/CAM environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2013, 66, 988–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehab, E.M.; Abdalla, H.S. Manufacturing cost modeling for concurrent product development. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2001, 17, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roto, V.; Heikkila, M. Design for value in a digital supply chain ecosystem. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Edinburgh, UK, 10–14 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, S.Q.; Zhou, Z.D. Internet-based DFX for rapid and economical tool/mould making. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2004, 24, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metric | Before Implementation (Mean, SD) | After Implementation (Mean, SD) | t-Value | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Average Design Days (days) | 9.52 (3.73) | 8.47 (3.82) | 6.86 | 7.08 × 10−10 (p < 0.001) |
Customer Satisfaction (1~10) | 5.60 (1.70) | 6.89 (1.65) | −12.27 | 2.63 × 10−21 (p < 0.001) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hsieh, Y.-J.; Huang, W.-J.; Lan, L.-H. An Integrated Smart Manufacturing System for Customer Design Experience. Systems 2024, 12, 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100426
Hsieh Y-J, Huang W-J, Lan L-H. An Integrated Smart Manufacturing System for Customer Design Experience. Systems. 2024; 12(10):426. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100426
Chicago/Turabian StyleHsieh, Ying-Jiun, Wan-Ju Huang, and Li-Hung Lan. 2024. "An Integrated Smart Manufacturing System for Customer Design Experience" Systems 12, no. 10: 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100426
APA StyleHsieh, Y. -J., Huang, W. -J., & Lan, L. -H. (2024). An Integrated Smart Manufacturing System for Customer Design Experience. Systems, 12(10), 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100426