Next Article in Journal
Fractional Orthotriple Fuzzy Dombi Power Partitioned Muirhead Mean Operators and Their Application for Evaluating the Government Information Disclosure on Public Health Emergencies
Previous Article in Journal
A Model-Based Approach for the Methodical Development and Configuration of Modular Product Families
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Decision-Making on Selection of Talent Management Methods in the Era of Digitalization

School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200020, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2023, 11(9), 450; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090450
Submission received: 29 July 2023 / Revised: 22 August 2023 / Accepted: 22 August 2023 / Published: 31 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Data-Driven Group Decision-Making)

Abstract

:
The application of digital technologies has a significant impact on organizational performance by way of different talent management methods, thereby enabling the maintenance of the organization’s continuous competitive advantage. Therefore, this paper studied the four key factors that influence organizational performance: digital technology application (DTA), inclusive talent management (ITM), exclusive talent management (ETM), and non-equilibrium investment (NET), aiming to investigate how digital technology application and talent management methods positively affect organizational performance, explore how this relationship is regulated by NET, and provides suggestions for selecting appropriate talent management methods. To conduct quantitative analysis, questionnaires were used with a sample size of 534 middle and senior managers as well as human resources practitioners from different enterprises. The structural equation model (SEM) was employed along with 5000 iterations to test the research hypotheses. The results indicate a positive correlation between digital technology application and organizational performance. Furthermore, ITM and ETM act as intermediaries between digital technology application and organizational performance, whereas NET plays a regulatory role in relation to ITM and organizational performance. This paper offers comprehensive insights into the factors influencing organizational performance and sheds light on how organizations make decisions regarding data-driven talent management methods at different stages of development.

1. Introduction

As times have evolved, the use of data in human resource management has shifted from basic indicator analysis to big data analysis. Forward-thinking managers now prefer using big data and artificial intelligence for talent management because they recognize that talents are crucial strategic resources for organizations and key drivers of sustainable competitiveness [1,2,3]. For instance, Google utilizes its own forecasting algorithm to adjust employee salaries in a timely and flexible manner to prevent talent attrition [4]. Amazon employs artificial intelligence (AI) to monitor the productivity of warehouse workers. In one warehouse alone, over 300 employees were terminated due to failing to meet productivity targets. Public information suggests that AI automation decision-making leads to a more than 10% annual dismissal rate in this factory [5]. Inclusive talent management (ITM) emphasizes equal investment in all employees, whereas exclusive talent management (ETM) differentiates employees based on their relative potential for enhancing competitive advantage. Therefore, addressing the issue regarding the decision on talent management selection arising from the digital transformation of human resources is both theoretically and practically significant for organizations seeking to maintain and enhance their competitive edge. The key innovation of this study lies in its approach to talent management by integrating both ITM and ETM methodologies. This innovative approach addresses the gap in empirical research on talent management methods and sheds light on the underlying relationship between them. By doing so, it offers valuable insights to inform decision-making in talent management practices.
In recent years, there has been growing interest among scholars and managers in the digital transformation of human resources. Organizations are increasingly integrating talent management with sustainable competitive advantage [6,7,8]. ITM emerges as a comprehensive approach that focuses on promoting equal access to company resources, fulfilling employees’ material and spiritual needs, and ultimately enhancing their sense of responsibility toward contributing to organizational growth [9]. Consequently, many organizations have adopted inclusive talent management as a strategy for future development [10,11]. However, ITM also faces criticism due to potentially unnecessary and costly investments in human resources. Previous studies have shown that employee abilities and contributions are not evenly distributed within an organization; a few highly talented individuals can significantly impact organizational performance [12]. This has led to the practice of ETM—a distinct approach to management that is centered around harnessing the distinctive contributions of talented individuals to an organization. It places a strong emphasis on the attraction and retention of top-tier employees, as well as enhancing the overall value of an organization’s competitive advantage. This methodology has gained significant traction in the field of talent management and has been adopted extensively in practice [13]. The United States Office of Personnel Management recognizes this approach as focusing on managing incumbents and potential personnel crucial for achieving the organization’s mission rather than all employees. ETM is widely acknowledged in theory and extensively implemented in practice [14].
In previous studies, it has been suggested that talent management in organizations should focus on equal resource allocation, talent absorption, and the creation of an inclusive and equitable work environment. However, some researchers argue that a more differentiated approach is necessary when it comes to investing resources in high-performing employees who have the potential to contribute significantly to the organization’s success in the present and future. The debate over which talent management mode to adopt has largely been discussed at a theoretical level, with limited empirical evidence to support either approach. Furthermore, there have been few studies that directly compare and examine the two talent management modes simultaneously. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the internal logical relationship between these different talent management modes through empirical research, with a specific focus on their impact on organizational performance. Drawing on the fundamental principles of talent management, this paper argues that organizations must adapt to the rapidly evolving digital landscape and adopt talent management strategies that leverage digital technologies. Building upon this premise, the paper incorporates the theory that the environment determines organizational structure [15] and the decision-making research on the application of digital technology in human resources. It also explores the choice of talent management mode under the theory of unbalanced growth. Specifically, this study seeks to answer the following questions:
  • How does the implementation of digital human resources technology affect organizational performance?
  • How do ITM and ETM influence this relationship?
  • What is the interplay between ITM and ETM?
  • What moderating effect do different talent management methods have on organizational performance?
The research framework of this paper is based on the literature on talent management styles driven by the digitalization of human resources, which provides guidance for studying the antecedents and consequences of talent management style decisions and how to use these elements to achieve high organizational performance. Therefore, this paper focuses on enterprises that utilize digital technology in their human resources practices. The aim is to provide insights into talent management strategies that can enhance organizational performance. The structure of the paper is as follows: Section 1 introduces the research variables and provides a comprehensive explanation of the research theme. Section 2 presents the theoretical hypothesis and research model. Section 3 and Section 4 describe the research methods and measurements employed. Finally, in the last section, we discuss the findings, analysis, and draw conclusions.

2. Theoretical Basis and Research Hypotheses

2.1. Digital Technology Application in Talent Management

Talent management is a typical practical application that precedes theoretical research, and not all employees possess skills that are of equal strategic importance to the organization [16]. It has received groundbreaking empirical research in academia [1]. Although the application of digital technology in human resource management still requires significant data support for improved efficiency, it has become increasingly prevalent in various aspects of organizational management, including talent selection [17], training and development, assessment and supervision, rewards and incentives, talent evaluation, employee relations, and other areas of human resource management [18,19]. Research has shown that the introduction of artificial intelligence technology into human resource management functions can effectively change and manage organizations through their workforce, which is beneficial for improving internal and external performance as well as the work attitude of employees. Consequently, it positively impacts overall organizational performance [20,21]. IBM has launched Watson Recruitment, an innovative application powered by artificial intelligence (AI), aimed at revolutionizing the candidate selection process for organizations. By employing digital technology, organizations can enhance their employer brand, expand the pool of potential candidates, and ultimately improve the overall selection process. However, despite its numerous benefits, the adoption of AI technology in recruitment is hindered by concerns regarding security, privacy, and the so-called “black box problem [21].” Although there are ethical considerations surrounding its use at an individual level or with regard to employee emotions; at an organizational level digital technology is becoming increasingly prevalent.
In line with the theory that posits the influence of the environment on organizational structure, three key factors shape the design of organizational structures: overall ecology, system dynamics, and resource dependence. Specifically, the competitive environment, technical and task requirements and the size of the organization are key drivers that shape the organizational structure. In the context of human resource management, the introduction of digital technology necessitates adjustments to the organizational structure. This adaptation prompts changes in the management system, impacts the utilization of external resources, and ultimately affects talent effectiveness and organizational performance. It becomes evident that digital transformation is not merely a targeted adjustment but rather a Darwinian evolution process for organizations. When an organization fails to adapt its overall capabilities to meet competitive environmental demands adequately, it risks being replaced by more resilient entities. China’s “Digital China Development Report” from 2022 reveals that as global digital technology continues to develop rapidly, China’s digital economy scale amounts to 45.5 trillion yuan (39.8% of GDP). In light of this trend, numerous human resource management practices have emerged due to advancements in digital technology usage within organizations’ operations. Therefore, undertaking a digital transformation in talent management becomes an inevitable choice for evolutionary development based on Darwinian principles. Hence, this study presents several assumptions:
H1a: 
Digital technology application in human resource management has a positive influence on organizational performance.
Digital technology allows for the seamless integration of real-time data into talent management, connecting an organization’s human resource management system with external market dynamics, internal production information, and other management systems. This resolves issues related to delayed, inaccurate, or incomplete data analysis in traditional talent management approaches. Additionally, it addresses the limitations of talent management in terms of forecasting and its impact on team management [22,23]. The Uber platform utilizes real-time analysis of a driver’s braking and acceleration data to assess their driving behavior and provide timely reminders for necessary rest breaks. Previous studies suggest that ITM places significant emphasis on the strategic role of human resources in organizational development. It encompasses various aspects of talent management, including attraction, identification, development, retention, and deployment through systematic projects. ITM advocates for the interactive integration of people and technology to ensure equal development rights for every employee, and this approach promotes a people-oriented mindset that fosters harmonious development between organizations and employees [24]. Additionally, it highlights using digital technology to enhance individual work efficiency and team performance [25]. Research has shown that traditional talent management relies on static information stored within human resources information systems. In contrast, digital age talent analysis can span across entire business processes by accurately capturing dynamic data on talent characteristics. This allows for the efficient identification of proprietary talents within an organization—high-potential individuals who contribute directly or have a significant future impact on organizational performance [26]. By investing more resources into these talents’ growth and commitment to the organization, overall performance can be improved.
H1b: 
Digital technology application in human resource management has a positive influence on ITM.
H1c: 
Digital technology application in human resource management has a positive influence on ETM.

2.2. ITM and ETM

This paper examines the impact of digital technology on talent management, contributing to the existing empirical research in this field. Talent management encompasses two main areas: ITM and ETM. ITM focuses on analyzing human capital at the organizational level, aiming to improve individual efficiency and overall organizational performance. On the other hand, ETM concentrates on managing high-performance and high-potential employees within an organization [27]. These individuals are considered exclusive talents due to their relative value to the organization, leading to focused investment in their development. Digital talent management enables the establishment of a dynamic team operation model [22]. By leveraging comprehensive talent data prediction and analysis through digital technology, organizations can effectively identify and attract top talents as well as provide targeted training for new employees [28,29]. This approach improves decision-making by analyzing risk and sensitivity data. It efficiently meets business needs while seamlessly integrating human resources with front-end operations, transforming HR into effective business partners [30,31]. This study argues that both ITM and ETM have the potential to serve as valuable business partners. Therefore, this study puts forward the following assumptions:
H2a: 
ITM has a positive influence on organizational performance.
H2b: 
ETM has a positive influence on organizational performance.
After implementing digital technology and artificial intelligence equipment, organizations can transform the work environment for employees. This transformation provides effective technical support to enhance work efficiency and encourages employees to actively explore and adapt to changes in their roles. Inclusive talent management in organizations, where team members are treated fairly and their strengths are fully utilized, can significantly impact team performance [32]. The Annual Observation Report on Human Resource Management in China in 2022 issued by Beisen highlights that enterprises currently face a significant challenge of talent shortage, leading to intensified competition among them. Instead of relying solely on high salaries to attract external talents from the market, it is more practical for organizations to identify, develop, and retain exclusive talents within their existing teams using digital technology and talent inventory [33]. These efforts should primarily focus on key positions and proprietary talents within the organization. By leveraging big data and artificial intelligence technology, organizations can effectively label and externalize the work behavior of proprietary talents based on network node characteristics, connections, and content. This enables the efficient identification of talented individuals [34] who exhibit positive emotional responses toward their work while demonstrating higher dedication to the organization. They often find ways to complete tasks faster with lower costs while making contributions beyond their assigned roles. Both ETM—which enhances organizational competitive advantage through employee potential—and ITM should be implemented according to the organization’s development stage [35]. Hence, this study puts forward the following assumptions:
H3a: 
ITM plays an intermediary role between digital technology application and organizational performance.
H3b: 
ETM plays an intermediary role between digital technology application and organizational performance.

2.3. The Regulatory Role of NET

According to the resource-based theory, differences in organizational performance are attributed to variations in resource investment and efficiency levels. The uniqueness and scarcity of exclusive talents play a crucial role in achieving high performance and competitive advantage. Technology application across different organizational levels, as well as the varying contributions of talents, justifies uneven investment [14]. Albert Hirschman’s unbalanced development theory suggests that investing more resources in proprietary talents promotes inclusive talent development through the diffusion effect. Williamson’s inverted “U” theory further explains how different talent management approaches impact organizational performance. During the early stages of organizational development, growth disparities among talents are necessary for performance improvement. As organizations mature, talent level differences gradually diminish, allowing for inclusive talent management practices. In practice, having employees with high creative potential is the key to improving an organization’s innovation performance, and talent retention is proven to provide the best value to customers [36], Google’s talent analysis team maximizes retention of proprietary talents through salary policies but does not extend similar material and spiritual incentives to ordinary employees [37]. The following assumptions are put forward:
H4a: 
NET has a positive influence on organizational performance.
H4b: 
NET has a positive influence on the relationship between ITM and organizational performance.
In summary, the research model of this study is shown in Figure 1.

3. Research Design

3.1. Research Samples and Data Collection

From the perspective of urban development, this study focuses on analyzing and comparing first-tier developed cities and second-tier developing cities. From the perspective of geographical selection, this study selected cities in eastern, central, and western China, including Shanghai, Xi’an, and Zhengzhou, for data analysis. The data were gathered through various channels including the Shanghai University MBA Exchange Group, Xi’an Jiaotong University MBA Exchange Group, Zhengzhou Human Resources Exchange Group, and Shanghai Human Resources Exchange Group. To ensure the reliability and validity of the data, middle and senior managers along with human resources practitioners were selected to complete the questionnaire due to their clear understanding of organizational talent management. Before distributing the questionnaire formally, a Delphi research method was employed to review it with human resources experts. Additionally, small-scale interviews were conducted to fill out the questionnaire and make necessary revisions for clarity. A total of 534 questionnaires were collected; however, only 359 were considered valid after excluding responses from non-middle-/high-level executives and non-human resources practitioners. Table 1 provides specific details about the sample characteristics.

3.2. Variable Measurement

To ensure the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, we used established scales from the existing literature for all variables in this study and followed standard procedures of translation, back-translation, and revision for these scales. Additionally, we made necessary adjustments based on the specific requirements of our study. The scale was designed as a 5-point Likert scale with options ranging from 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = uncertain, 4 = agree, and 5 = highly agree.
  • Digital Technology Application. This paper draws on the work of Carvalho [38] and Carvalho and Dubey [33] on the Big Data-Driven AI Adoption Scale, which consists of the following key items: “The adoption of digital technology by a company improves decision making”, “The adoption of digital technology by a company enables easy integration of information from different data sources”, “The adoption of digital technology by a company enables better utilization and optimization of resources”, and “The goal of the adoption of digital technology by a company is based on a dynamic business environment”, etc.
  • ITM. The ITM framework aims to harness and leverage the skills and abilities of all individuals within a given organizational setting. Based on the inclusive talent development model by Fang Yangchun [39], this scale consists of four main items. These include “building a diverse talent team within the company”, “addressing and learning from the company’s shortcomings and failures in inclusivity towards employees”, and “focusing on showcasing employee strengths, fairness, and mutual benefit”.
  • ETM. The ETM framework aims to select a specific employee group that plays a decisive role in the current and future achievements of the organization. Drawing from Mousa and Ayoubi’s [40] ETM scale, it consists of five key items. These include statements such as “the company’s management training is limited to a few employees”, “the company categorizes employees into talented and non-talented groups”, “the company makes efforts to retain identified talented employees”, and “the company does not treat all employees equally”.
  • NET. This paper examines the staff salary scale of values proposed by Shao Jianping [41] in 2017 and draws important insights. Investing in employee resources is a way to recognize their abilities, which can be achieved through five key aspects: aligning resource investment with employees’ skill levels, position levels, job performance, and development potential, etc.
  • Organizational performance. This paper examines the organizational performance scale, known as the balanced scorecard proposed by Chen Guoquan [42] in 2009. The scale consists of four dimensions: finance, operations, customers, and learning development. It encompasses 12 items that assess various aspects such as profitability advantage, operational efficiency advantage, customer satisfaction advantage, and employee satisfaction advantage.

3.3. Statistical Analysis

In this study, we used SPSS 26.0 for descriptive statistical analysis and AMOS 26.0 for confirmatory factor analysis. We also included demographic factors such as gender, age, education level, and years of work in the questionnaire as control variables to account for their potential impact on talent management style and organizational performance.

4. Data Analysis and Results

4.1. Reliability and Validity Tests

The overall scale in this study has a KMO value of 0.902, indicating good sampling adequacy. The spherical test also yields a highly significant Sig value, allowing for factor analysis to be conducted. All items have standardized factor loads ranging from 0.58 to 0.82, which meets or exceeds the acceptance standard of 0.6. The variables demonstrate good internal consistency with Cronbach’s α coefficient greater than or close to 0.8. Additionally, each variable has an AVE value greater than or close to 0.5, indicating high convergence validity (see Table 2).
The standardized correlation coefficients between pairwise dimensions in this discriminant validity test are all less than the square root of the corresponding AVE value. This indicates that all dimensions exhibit good discriminant validity, as shown in Table 3.
The results of the confirmatory factor analysis are presented in Table 4. Among the four factor models, the five-factor model demonstrates the best-fit index, suggesting that there is no significant multicollinearity effect among variables and that the discrimination validity of the five constructs is satisfactory. The fitting indexes for the five-factor model are as follows: χ2 = 850.586, df = 395, RMSEA = 0.057, IFI = 0.906, TLI = 0.895, and CFI = 0.905. All these values meet the requirements of the fitting standard and indicate a good overall fit for the measurement model.

4.2. Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis

The descriptive statistical results of the main variables are presented in Table 5. Pearson correlation analysis is conducted to examine the relationships between these variables. The analysis reveals a significant positive correlation between digital technology application and ITM, proprietary talent management, NET, and organizational performance. Additionally, ITM shows a significant positive correlation with NET and organizational performance, whereas ETM exhibits a similar relationship with these factors. Furthermore, there is also a significant positive correlation observed between NET and organizational performance.

4.3. Hypothetical Test Results Analysis

4.3.1. Imaginary Relation Test

Based on the regression results presented in Table 6, several conclusions can be drawn. Firstly, we tested the relationship between digital technology application and ITM. Model M1 includes all control variables, whereas model M2 focuses solely on digital technology applications. After controlling for other factors, it was found that digital technology application has a significantly positive influence on ITM (β = 0.481, p < 0.001). Additionally, ΔR2 is 0.251 and significant, further supporting the notion that digital technology application positively influences ITM (H1b).
Secondly, we examined the relationship between variables and organizational performance. Building upon the control variables in model M1, we introduced a digital technology application to create model M4. The results revealed a significant positive influence of digital technology application on organizational performance (β = 0.328, p < 0.001), thereby confirming H1a.
Thirdly, by incorporating ITM into model M5 alongside the control variables, we assessed its influence on organizational performance. The findings indicated a significant positive effect of ITM on organizational performance (β = 0.431, p < 0.001), providing support for H2a.
Lastly, when investigating the link between NET and organizational performance, NET was added to model M1 to form model M6. The analysis demonstrated that NET has a substantial positive influence on organizational performance (β = 0.552, p< 0.001), thus corroborating H4a.
Based on the regression analysis in Table 7, we can conclude the following findings regarding the relationship between digital technology application and ETM. Firstly, when controlling for gender, age, education, and working years using model M11, adding digital technology application to form model M12 shows a significantly positive influence coefficient on ETM (β = 0.135, p < 0.05). Additionally, ΔR2 is found to be 0.021 with statistical significance. Secondly, when examining the relationship between variables and organizational performance, we incorporate ETM data into model M11 to create model M14. The results indicate that ETM has a significantly positive influence coefficient on organizational performance (β = 0.198, p < 0.001), thus supporting H2b.

4.3.2. ITM and ETM Mediation Effect Test

According to Wen Zhaolin’s [43] mediating effect test method, the mediating effect of ITM is examined. Firstly, after controlling for variables, it is found that digital technology application has a significant positive influence on organizational performance (β = 0.328, p < 0.001). Secondly, in model M2, there is a significant positive correlation between digital technology application and ITM (β = 0.481, p < 0.001). Additionally, ITM has a significantly positive influence on organizational performance (β = 0.431, p < 0.001). Finally, in model M7, where independent and intermediate variables are included in the regression equation simultaneously, it is observed that ITM positively affects organizational performance (β = 0.352, p < 0.001), whereas the regression coefficient for digital technology application decreases from 0.328 (p < 0.001). This indicates that ITM serves as an intermediary function, supporting H3a.
In testing the mediating effect of ETM using the same method, we observed that ETM has a positive influence on organizational performance (β = 0.156, p < 0.01) when both independent and intermediary variables are included in the regression equation in model M15. Additionally, the regression coefficient for digital technology application on organizational performance increased from 0.135 (p < 0.05) to 0.307 (p < 0.001), as shown in Table 7. This indicates that ETM serves as an intermediary function, supporting H3b.
The statistical effect of the mediation effect is improved using the bias-corrected percentile bootstrap method to test the mediation effect of two talent management methods (see Table 8). The data results indicate that:
-
The total mediation effect, with a 95% confidence interval [0.136, 0.279], is found to be significant as it does not include 0.
-
The indirect effect Ind1 (0.182), which consists of “digital technology application → ITM → organizational performance”, also shows a significant mediating effect with a 95% confidence interval [0.113, 0.254] that does not include 0. It indicates that ITM has a significant mediating effect, confirming that the mediating effect is established and H3a is supported.
-
Similarly, the indirect effect Ind2 (0.032), composed of “digital technology application → ETM → organizational performance”, has a significant mediating effect with a 95% confidence interval [0.008,0.063] that does not include 0. It indicates that ETM has a significant mediating effect, confirming that the mediating effect is established and H3b is supported.
-
The mediating effect value of Ind1-Ind2 is calculated as 0.150 with a bootstrap-based 95% confidence interval of [0.072, 0.230] that does not include 0. This indicates that the mediating effect of Ind1is significantly greater than the one for Ind2, and the mediating effect of ITM on organizational performance is significantly greater than that of ETM.
-
The mediating effect value of Ind1-Ind3 is calculated as 0.189 with a bootstrap-based 95% confidence interval of [0.121, 0.261] that does not include 0. This indicates that the mediating effect of Ind1 is significantly greater than the one for Ind3, thus further supporting H1a and H3a.
-
The mediating effect value of Ind2-Ind3 is calculated as 0.039 with a bootstrap-based 95% confidence interval of [0.008, 0.079] that does not include 0. This indicates that the mediating effect of Ind2 is significantly greater than the one for Ind3, thus further supporting H1a and H3b.

4.3.3. The Moderating Effect of NET

Based on M7, the variable of NET is included in the model to create M8. The interaction between ITM and NET is found to be significant (β = 0.170, p < 0.001), indicating that NET has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between ITM and organizational performance. To further analyze this relationship, we conducted a simple estimation using the average value of NET as well as one standard deviation above and below it as adjustment variables. Table 9 shows that under high levels of NET, the impact coefficient is 0.345 (p < 0.001), whereas under low levels of NET, it is 0.133 (p < 0.001). These results demonstrate that the adjustment effect of NET is significant.
Figure 2 shows that when NET is low (M-1SD), ITM has a negative impact on organizational performance (t = 2.837, p < 0.001). Conversely, when NET is high (M + 1SD), ITM has a positive influence on organizational performance (t = 5.750, p < 0.001). This suggests that as NET increases, the influence of ITM transitions to ETM and becomes stronger in impacting organizational performance. Figure 2 visually represents this transition with a larger positive slope for high NET.

5. Research Conclusions and Discussion

5.1. Research Conclusions and Theoretical Contributions

This paper examines the influence mechanism of NET on talent management and organizational performance in the context of digital technology application. The findings reveal that increasing NET in talent management weakens the negative impact of ITM on organizational performance. This shift leads to a change in talent management mode from ITM to ETM, resulting in improved organizational performance through the intermediary role of talent management. Additionally, NET regulates the relationship between ITM and organizational performance, further enhancing the positive influence of talent management on organizational performance. The theoretical contributions of this study are as follows:
Firstly, this study expands the research perspective on organizational performance. Previous studies have mainly focused on examining the mechanisms of organizational performance from the perspectives of human capital theory, social exchange theory, and resource-based theory. However, this paper introduces the development theory of economics into talent management to explain that ITM and ETM are different talent management methods adopted by organizations at various stages of development. This finding aligns with previous research conducted by Maniam Kaliannan [4] and Fang Yangchun [16], which concluded that both ITM and ETM significantly impact organizational performance. Therefore, this paper contributes to enriching our understanding of organizational performance.
Secondly, this study explores the boundary conditions for how talent management modes affect organizational performance from a NET perspective. In today’s digital transformation era, organizations respond to ITM through balanced investment in talent management while adopting ETM mode due to NET practices [8]. By considering NET as a moderating variable, this study explains the influencing factors between talent management modes and organizational performance while revealing their contingency relationship. Our findings support the contingency view and contribute to further developing research on NET within organizations. Additionally, based on the perspective of NET, we argue that organizations should selectively invest in talent management according to their developmental stage—a key focus for company reform efforts. This study demonstrates that a significant level of NET in talent management enhances its impact on organizational performance, thus expanding our understanding of its boundary conditions.

5.2. Implications for Practice

The promotion of organizational performance is crucial for organizational development. This paper examines the impact of digital technology on organizational performance through talent management and provides the following insights for management practice:
Firstly, digital transformation is an inevitable direction for future organizations, as it reveals the relationship between digital technology application and talent management, which ultimately impacts organizational performance. To avoid being surpassed by more innovative organizations and to maximize limited resources, managers must carefully consider how to allocate resources. In the early stages of an organization’s development, investing in high-potential and high-performance talents who can significantly impact performance is crucial. As the organization matures, attention should shift towards improving overall efficiency on a per capita basis while also focusing on ITM. It is important to tailor talent management methods based on the specific needs of each organization.
Secondly, this study reveals that different talent management methods can have both positive and negative effects on organizational performance. Talents serve as the foundation for organizations to achieve sustainable competitiveness, and the impact of various talent management methods varies at different stages of organizational development. To mitigate these effects, managers should prioritize employees’ individual characteristics, unleash their potential, motivate them through a combination of material and spiritual incentives, enhance the incentive system, and ultimately improve organizational performance by enhancing employee performance. Furthermore, when an organization heavily invests in a select few high-level talents, it may yield positive results for organizational performance. However, this approach also carries the risk of losing key talents which can negatively impact the organization. As managers, it is crucial to gradually establish a robust talent pipeline to prevent intermittent disruptions in organizational performance caused by the loss of key talents.

5.3. Research Deficiencies and Prospects

This study has made progress in researching the influence of digital technology application on organizational performance under talent management. However, there are still some shortcomings and limitations that need to be addressed. Firstly, this paper is a cross-sectional study, which limits its ability to fully understand the process mechanism of how talent management affects organizational performance. Future research should consider collecting data from multiple time points and adopting the qualitative method to overcome this limitation. Secondly, the data obtained carries uncertainty, and in future research, robust optimization methods can be employed to mitigate the risks associated with this uncertainty. Thirdly, it is important to note that digital technology application not only impacts organizational performance but also influences the development and performance of individual talents. Therefore, further investigation is needed to understand how digital technology affects personal talent performance. Fourth, whereas ETM has been successfully validated in practical organizational management settings, this study found a relatively low intermediary effect of ETM on organizational performance due to the limited use of widely accepted scales. Subsequent research should explore alternative evaluation scales for ETM. Lastly, under the context of digital technology applications, there is currently no accurate definition or measurement for talent management and NET. It is crucial for future research to address these gaps in order to keep up with the rapid development of emerging technologies such as digital technology applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C., Y.J. and Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, L.C. and Y.J.; methodology, Y.J. and C.W.; supervision, C.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers of this manuscript for their careful work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dries, N. Talent management, from phenomenon to theory: Introduction to the Special Issue. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2013, 23, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pagan-Castaño, E.; Ballester-Miquel, J.C.; Sánchez-García, J.; Guijarro-García, M. What’s next in talent management? J. Bus. Res. 2022, 141, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gallardo-Gallardo, E.; Thunnissen, M.; Scullion, H. Talent management: Context matters. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 457–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silverman, R.E.; Gellman, L. Apps to Battle Job Bias: Software Takes on Hiring and Workplace Practices. Wall Str. J. 2015, 7. Available online: http://www.wsj.com/articles/apps-take-on-workplace-bias-1443601027 (accessed on 25 August 2023).
  5. Colin, L. How Amazon automatically tracks and fires warehouse workers for ‘productivity’. The Verge. 26 April 2019. Available online: https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/25/18516004/amazon-warehouse-fulfillment-centers-productivity-firing-terminations (accessed on 25 August 2023).
  6. Kaliannan, M.; Darmalinggam, D.; Dorasamy, M.; Abraham, M. Inclusive talent development as a key talent management approach: A systematic literature review. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2023, 33, 100926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bag, S.; Pretorius, J.H.C.; Gupta, S.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 163, 120420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sparrow, P.R.; Makram, H. What is the value of talent management? Building value-driven processes within a talent management architecture. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2015, 25, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, X. Leadership-deployment exchange and employee service innovation: The mediating role of being regulated across levels based on different service teams. Manag. Mod. 2017, 37, 38–40. [Google Scholar]
  10. Asplund, K. When profession trumps potential:The moderating role of professional identification in employees’ reactions to talent management. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 539–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McDonnell, A.; Collings, D.G.; Mellahi, K.; Schuler, R. Talent management: A systematic review and future prospects. Eur. J. Int. Manag. 2017, 11, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sha, K.; Yang, Z. Review and the prospect of star research in organizations. Foreign Econ. Manag. 2016, 38, 86–95+112. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, Y.; Wan, Y. The impact of proprietary talent management approaches on individuals: A systematic review and research ideas. China Hum. Resour. Dev. 2022, 39, 23–41. [Google Scholar]
  14. Woerkommv, M. The influence of underlying philosophies on talent management: Theory, implications for practice, and research agenda. J. World Bus. 2014, 49, 192–203. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jeffrey, P.; Huseyin, L. The Effect of Competition on Some Dimensions of Organizational Structure. Soc. Forces 1973, 52, 268–279. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lepak, D.P.; Snell, S.A. The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1999, 24, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pillai, R.; Sivathanu, B. Adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for talent acquisition in IT-ITeS organizations. Benchmarking Int. J. 2020, 27, 2599–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garcia-Arroyo, J.; Osca, A. Big data contributions to human resource management: A systematic review. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 32, 4337–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xie, X.; Zuo, Y.; Hu, Q. Human resource management in the digital era: A perspective based on human-technology interaction. Manag. World 2021, 37, 200–216+13. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, Y.; Liu, Y. The bridge between “ideal” and “reality”: A review of human resource management implementation research. J. Manag. 2021, 18, 1881–1891. [Google Scholar]
  21. De Boeck, G.; Meyers, M.; Dries, N. Employee reactions to talent management: Assumptions versus evidence. J. Organ. Behav. 2018, 39, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xie, X.; Wei, J.; He, J.; Zuo, Y. Arrange the troops: A new practice of talent analysis in the era of online organization. Tsinghua Manag. Rev. 2022, 5, 71–90. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wiblen, S.; McDonnell, A. Connecting ‘talent’ meanings and multi-level context: A discursive approach. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 474–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fang, Y.; Jin, H. The Effect of Inclusive Leadership Style on Team Performance Based on the Mediating Role of Employee Self-Efficacy. Res. Manag. 2014, 35, 152–160. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Dai, X. The impact of inclusive talent development model on employees’ work investment—The mediating role of responsibility perception. Technol. Econ. 2019, 32, 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bonneton, D.; Festing, M.; Muratbekova-Touron, M. Exclusive Talent Management: Unveiling the Mechanisms of the Construction of an Elite Community. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2020, 17, 993–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meyers, M.C. The neglected role of talent proactivity: Integrating proactive behavior into talent-management theorizing. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020, 30, 100703. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bugg, K. Best practices for talent acquisition in 21st-century academic libraries. Libr. Leadersh. Manag. 2015, 29, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al Aina, R.; Atan, T. The Impact of Implementing Talent Management Practices on Sustainable Organizational Performance. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ji, Y.; Ma, Y. The robust maximum expert consensus model with risk aversion. Inf. Fusion 2023, 2023, 101866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Harsh, K.; Festing, M. Dynamic talent management capabilities and organizational agility—A qualitative exploration. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 59, 43–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Fang, Y. The influence of an inclusive atmosphere on the innovation behavior of scientific and technological talents. Sci. Res. Manag. 2017, 38, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J.; Bryde, D.J.; Giannakis, M.; Foropon, C.; Roubaud, D.; Hazen, B.T. Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 226, 107599. [Google Scholar]
  34. O’Connor, E.P.; Crowley-Henry, M. Exploring the relationship between exclusive talent management, perceived organizational justice and employee engagement: Bridging the literature. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 156, 903–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gelens, J.; Hofmans, J.; Dries, N.; Pepermans, R. Talent management and organizational justice: Employee reactions to high potential identification. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2014, 24, 59–175. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hughes, J.C.; Rog, E. Talent management: A strategy for improving employee recruitment, retention and engagement within hospitality organizations. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2008, 20, 743–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, X.; Fan, Z.; Tao, X. The application space and challenges of big data in human resource management-a comparative analysis based on Google and Tencent. China Hum. Resour. Dev. 2015, 22, 52–57+73. [Google Scholar]
  38. Carvalho, N.; Chaim, O.; Cazarini, E.; Gerolamo, M. Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: A positive prospect in Sustainable Manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 21, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fang, Y.; Chen, C. The impact of inclusive talent development model on employees’ craftsmanship. Sci. Res. Manag. 2018, 39, 154–160. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mousa, M.; Ayoubi, R.M. Inclusive/exclusive talent management, responsible leadership, and organizational downsizing: A study of academics in Egyptian public business schools. J. Manag. Dev. 2019, 38, 87–104. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shao, J.; Shan, W.; Si, X. Research on the development of a scale of employee value for a salary increase in enterprises. J. Manag. 2017, 14, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen, G. Organizational learning and learning organizations: The impact of the concept, competency model, and measurement discipline on performance. Manag. Rev. 2009, 21, 107–116. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wen, Z.; Zhang, L.; Hou, J.; Liu, H. Mediation effects test procedure and its application. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2004, 36, 614–620. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Theoretical framework.
Figure 1. Theoretical framework.
Systems 11 00450 g001
Figure 2. The moderating effect of NET on ITM and organizational performance.
Figure 2. The moderating effect of NET on ITM and organizational performance.
Systems 11 00450 g002
Table 1. Basic characteristics of samples.
Table 1. Basic characteristics of samples.
VariableOptionFrequencyPercentage
GenderMale17448.50%
Female18551.50%
AgeUnder 26 years old133.60%
26–30 years old6818.90%
31–35 years old10629.50%
36–40 years old10830.10%
Over 40 years old6417.80%
Education LevelTechnical secondary school and college154.20%
Bachelor’s degree or equivalent19955.40%
Master’s degree or above13938.70%
Other61.70%
Years of Work1–5 years5715.90%
6–10 years9526.50%
10–20 years17247.90%
Over 20 years359.70%
PositionMiddle to senior managers20857.90%
Human resources practitioners15142.10%
Company NatureState-owned enterprise8824.50%
Private enterprise21559.90%
Foreign enterprises4211.70%
Freelancer41.10%
Other102.80%
Company SizeMore than 1000 people13136.50%
500–1000 people8122.60%
200–500 people339.20%
Less than 20011431.80%
Table 2. Reliability and validity analysis.
Table 2. Reliability and validity analysis.
VariableCombined ReliabilityConvergent Validity
CRCronbach’αAVE
Digital technology application0.8150.8100.470
ITM0.8180.8160.530
ETM0.7930.7880.494
NET0.8490.8470.529
Organizational performance0.9180.9170.481
Table 3. Results of differentiated validity test for each dimension.
Table 3. Results of differentiated validity test for each dimension.
VariableDigital Technology ApplicationITMETMNETOrganizational Performance
Digital Technology Application0.470
ITM0.5780.530
ETM0.1680.0080.494
NET0.3080.4280.2580.529
Organizational Performance0.3770.4980.2180.5920.481
Square Root of AVE Value0.6860.7280.7030.7270.694
Table 4. Results of validation factor analysis.
Table 4. Results of validation factor analysis.
Modelχ2dfχ2/dfRMSEAIFITLICFI
Five-factor model850.5863952.1530.0570.9060.8950.905
Four-factor model1294.5053993.2440.0790.8140.7960.813
Three-factor model1520.4034023.7820.0880.7680.7470.766
Two-factor model2009.7614044.9750.1050.6670.6390.665
Single-factor mode2429.2494055.9980.1180.5800.5460.577
Note: There are different models that can be used to analyze the relationship between digital technology applications, ITM, ETM, NET, and organizational performance. These models include the five-factor model (digital technology application, ITM, ETM, NET, organizational performance), four-factor model (digital technology application, ITM + ETM, NET, organizational performance), three-factor model (digital technology application + ITM + ETM, NET, organizational performance), two-factor model (digital technology application + ITM + ETM + NET, organizational performance), and single-factor model (digital technology application + ITM + ETM + NET+ organizational performance). Each of these models includes varying combinations of digital technology applications, ITM, ETM, NET, and organizational performance.
Table 5. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis.
Table 5. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis.
VariableMSD12345
1. Digital Technology Application4.0570.5621
2. ITM3.8610.6700.483 **1
3. ETM3.2620.8340.138 **−0.0081
4. NET3.7160.6120.255 **0.348 **0.216 **1
5. Organizational Performance3.7110.5800.323 **0.420 **0.189 **0.535 **1
Note: ** At the 0.01 level (double-tailed), the correlation is significant.
Table 6. Model regression analysis 1.
Table 6. Model regression analysis 1.
VariableITMOrganizational Performance
M1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8
Gender0.0230.0380.0170.0280.0070.0560.0140.038
Age−0.093−0.0240.0880.1350.1280.1220.1440.147
Education Level−0.072−0.064−0.067−0.062−0.036−0.066−0.039−0.046
Years of Work0.242 *0.183 *−0.065−0.106−0.17−0.002−0.170−0.088
Digital Technology Application 0.481 *** 0.328 *** 0.159 **0.131 **
ITM 0.431 *** 0.352 ***0.257 ***
NET 0.552 *** 0.441 ***
ITM × NET 0.170 ***
R20.0310.2610.0070.1140.1870.3030.2060.394
ΔR20.0200.251−0.0040.1020.1750.2940.1920.380
F2.81824.9330.6299.09316.20930.75315.20228.410
Note: N = 500, * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, and *** represents p < 0.001.
Table 7. Model regression analysis 2.
Table 7. Model regression analysis 2.
VariableETMOrganizational Performance
M11M12M13M14M15M16M17
Gender0.0050.0090.0170.0160.0260.0590.043
Age−0.129−0.110.0880.1140.1520.1560.158
Education Level0.0480.05−0.067−0.077−0.07−0.067−0.05
Years of Work0.009−0.008−0.065−0.067−0.104−0.033−0.089
Digital Technology Application 0.135 * 0.307 ***0.195 ***0.115 *
ITM 0.277 ***
ETM 0.198 ***0.156 **0.0760.090 *
NET 0.475 ***0.384 ***
ITM × NET 0.171 ***
ETM × NET −0.023−0.073
R20.0160.0340.0070.0450.1380.3460.403
ΔR20.0050.021−0.0040.0320.1230.3310.386
F1.4462.5030.6293.3649.35323.17723.496
Note: N = 500, * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, and *** represents p < 0.001.
Table 8. Mediating effect analysis.
Table 8. Mediating effect analysis.
PathMediating EffectStandard Error95% Confidence IntervalEffect Proportion
Lower LimitUpper Limit
TOTAL0.2070.0370.1360.27961.04%
Ind1: Digital Technology Application—ITM—Organizational Performance0.1820.0360.1130.25453.71%
Ind2: Digital Technology Application—ETM—Organizational Performance0.0320.0140.0080.0639.37%
Ind3: Digital Technology Application—ITM-ETM—Organizational Performance−0.0070.006−0.0190.005−2.07%
Ind1–Ind20.1500.0400.0720.230——
Ind1–Ind30.1890.0360.1210.261——
Ind2–Ind30.0390.0180.0080.079——
Table 9. Moderating effect value and significance.
Table 9. Moderating effect value and significance.
Dependent
Variable
Independent VariableModerator VariableEffect ValueStandard Errort-Value95% Confidence Interval
Lower LimitLower Limit
Organizational PerformanceITMLow NET0.1330.0472.8370.0410.226
Medium NET0.2390.0465.1930.1490.330
High NET0.3450.0605.7500.2270.464
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, L.; Ji, Y.; Wijekoon, C.; Yuan, Y. Decision-Making on Selection of Talent Management Methods in the Era of Digitalization. Systems 2023, 11, 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090450

AMA Style

Cai L, Ji Y, Wijekoon C, Yuan Y. Decision-Making on Selection of Talent Management Methods in the Era of Digitalization. Systems. 2023; 11(9):450. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090450

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Lihong, Ying Ji, Chethana Wijekoon, and Yangyun Yuan. 2023. "Decision-Making on Selection of Talent Management Methods in the Era of Digitalization" Systems 11, no. 9: 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090450

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop