Next Article in Journal
Bstick: Handheld Virtual Reality Haptic Controller for Hand Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
Perspectives Organize Information in Mind and Nature: Empirical Findings of Point-View Perspective (P) in Cognitive and Material Complexity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ethical Regulators and Super-Ethical Systems
Communication

Problems with Abstract Observers and Advantages of a Model-Centric Cybernetics Paradigm

by 1,2,3,†
1
The Cybernetics Society, London WC2R 1ES, UK
2
The American Society for Cybernetics, Washington, DC 20052, USA
3
The International Society for the Systems Sciences, Ashland, TN 41101, USA
The W. Ross Ashby Digital Archive, http://rossashby.info (accessed on 3 April 2022).
Academic Editor: William T. Scherer
Systems 2022, 10(3), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030053
Received: 8 March 2022 / Revised: 5 April 2022 / Accepted: 15 April 2022 / Published: 19 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Collected papers from ISSS)
Since 1974, when Heinz von Foerster made the distinction between “the cybernetics of observed systems” as first-order cybernetics (1oC) and “the cybernetics of observing systems” as second-order cybernetics (2oC), cybernetics has been dominated by this observer-centric paradigm that he claimed cannot be extended meaningfully to a third order. Rather than attempting to extend his paradigm, we derive an alternative, model-centric cybernetics paradigm from the first principles of regulation, which naturally extends to three orders, where the third order is ethical regulation. We thus consider a type of regulator that requires a third model and a third observer: if the third model is a model of acceptable (ethical) situations, then a third observer is a necessary element of the system’s “conscience” that prevents any violations of the model of ethical situations. In this paradigm, the cybernetics of systems that are designed to exhibit ethical behaviour can be characterized as third-order cybernetics (3oC). By being able to extend the paradigm to include ethical systems, the model-centric paradigm brings clarity and utility that is not possible using the observer-centric paradigm and its under-specified (abstract) observers. Finally, new definitions for cybernetics are proposed that clearly differentiate between the science of cybernetics and the philosophy of cybernetics. View Full-Text
Keywords: ethical robots; ethical artificial intelligence; ethical cybernetics; third-order cybernetics; philosophy of cybernetics; empathy; sapientocracy ethical robots; ethical artificial intelligence; ethical cybernetics; third-order cybernetics; philosophy of cybernetics; empathy; sapientocracy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ashby, M. Problems with Abstract Observers and Advantages of a Model-Centric Cybernetics Paradigm. Systems 2022, 10, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030053

AMA Style

Ashby M. Problems with Abstract Observers and Advantages of a Model-Centric Cybernetics Paradigm. Systems. 2022; 10(3):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ashby, Mick. 2022. "Problems with Abstract Observers and Advantages of a Model-Centric Cybernetics Paradigm" Systems 10, no. 3: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030053

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop