Next Article in Journal
Genomic Analysis of Adaptability and Genetic Structure of Jabal Akhdar Goats: Evidence of Positive Selection in an Indigenous Omani Breed
Previous Article in Journal
Whole-Transcriptome Sequencing and Differential Expression Analysis of the Epididymis in Junggar Bactrian Camels Before and After Sexual Maturity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification, Exogenous Hormone Response, Gene Structure, and Conserved Motif Analysis of the GRF Gene Family in Cerasus humilis

Pharmacy of College, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Heping Road, Harbin 150040, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2025, 14(7), 763; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070763 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 May 2025 / Revised: 19 June 2025 / Accepted: 23 June 2025 / Published: 25 June 2025

Simple Summary

GRF, a transcription factor unique to plants, is crucial for plant growth and development as well as for reacting to environmental pressures. This encompasses treatments for cold, oxidation, osmotic stress, and hormones to control growth and development. The medicinal benefits of C. humilis are immense, earning it widespread affection and trust. Despite reports of the GRF gene in numerous species, research on C. humilis remains inadequate. The research not only verified the comprehensive bioinformatics examination of every GRF gene throughout C. humilis’s genome. Concurrently, the expression levels of the ChGRF gene in different tissues were studied, and the expression of the ChGRF gene under gibberellin treatment was also explored. These results provide a theoretical basis for understanding the function of GRF genes.

Abstract

The Cerasus humilis, a perennial shrub belonging to the Cerasus genus, is native to China and holds significant ecological and economic importance. Growth regulation factors (GRF) are a family of transcription factors (TF) that play a key role in plant growth and development. This research entailed an in-depth examination of the GRF family in C. humilis, exploring its significance in the evolution of C. humilis. Twelve GRF genes were identified in the C. humilis genome. Named separately as ChGRF1-Chumilis15987.1, ChGRF2-Chumilis25207.1, ChGRF3-Chumilis26233.1, ChGRF4-Chumilis08578.3, ChGRF5-Chumilis18808.1, ChGRF6-Chumilis12052.1, ChGRF7-Chumilis10417.1, ChGRF8-Chumilis01608.1, ChGRF9-Chumilis14057.1, ChGRF10-Chumilis12169.1, ChGRF11-Chumilis14952.1, and ChGRF12-Chumilis07534.1. Phylogenetic analysis divided twelve GRF genes into five subfamilies. The gene structure, pattern, and cis-regulatory components of the GRF gene family were analyzed. In addition, according to collinearity analysis, there are six collinearity with Arabidopsis, twelve collinearity with Malus pumila, eight collinearity with Vitis vinifera, and three collinearity with Oryza sativa. Intraspecific collinearity analysis revealed the presence of three pairs of tandem repeat genes in the dwarf cherry genome. Identifying cis-acting elements revealed the prominent presence of gibberellin reaction elements, which are widely distributed in the promoter region. Cluster heatmap analysis showed that ChGRF2 had the highest expression levels in fruits and stems. ChGRF3 is highly expressed in red fruits of different colors, while ChGRF6 and ChGRF12 are highly expressed in yellow fruits. This study mainly focused on dwarf cherries treated with gibberellin. As the treatment time increased, the ChGRF gene showed different expression levels. ChGRF2, ChGRF3, ChGRF6, and ChGRF12 were up-regulated under gibberellin treatment. These genes all contain hormone-responsive cis-acting elements, indicating tht the ChGRF gene family plays a vital role under gibberellin treatment in C. humilis. The results laid the foundation for further research on the biological functions of the GRF genes in C. humilis.

1. Introduction

Transcription factors play an essential role in the growth, development, metabolism, reproduction, and differentiation of plants [1]. Growth-regulating factors (GRF) are a family of small transcription factors that play an important role in plant growth, development, and lifespan [2,3,4,5]. GRF genes are an important class of genes. They have two conserved domains at the N-terminus, namely, QLQ (Gln, Leu, Gln) and WRC (Trp, Arg, Cys) at the N-terminus, respectively [6]. Resembling the N-terminal end of SWI2/SNF2 in yeast, the SWI2/SNF2 protein structure participates in chromatin remodeling complexes in yeast, suggesting that the QLQ domain may also have this function [7]. Furthermore, the QLQ domain can engage with the preserved configuration of the GIF protein SNH to execute the transcription activation process. In the WRC domain, along with the zinc finger motif involved in DNA binding, there is a nuclear localization signal (NLS). Binding to the cis-acting regions of target genes, it can regulate the expression of downstream genes [8]. OsGRF1 is the first GRF gene cloned from Oryza sativa L, and it plays an important role in the regulation of stem growth [9]. On this basis, GRF transcription factors in a variety of plants have been identified and analyzed.
The GRF gene family is involved in various physiological activities, especially at the early stage. These include leaf development [10], root growth [11], floral organ formation [12], seed formation [13], hormonal signaling, etc. [14]. Among them, plant hormones include auxin, cytokinin (CK), abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellin (GA), etc., and they play roles by responding to the signal transduction of hormones [15]. Strong expression of the GRF family is evident in the tips of roots, buds of flowers, and immature leaves. Elevating the levels of BnGRF2a can boost Brassica napus oil production by 50%, accelerate leaf growth by 20%, and enhance photosynthesis efficiency by 40%. The overexpression or disruption of AtGRF5 will affect the size of A. thaliana leaves. The function of AtGRF5 is more crucial in the processes of growth and development [16]. AtGRF8 participates in the development of plant flowers. Furthermore, in A. thaliana, the overexpression of the BnGRF2a gene promotes the elongation of the pistil, resulting in a low selfing rate. Therefore, deep research on the GRF gene family of C. humilis is fundamental.
C. humilis, also known as Chinese dwarf cherry, is a dwarf fruit tree belonging to the genus Cerasus in the Rosaceae family. The appearance of its fruits is identical to that of cherries, and the taste is similar to that of plums. They are sweet and sour, quite delicious, and possess a unique flavor and fruit fragrance [17,18]. The pulp of C. humilis is rich in nutrients such as sugar, protein, mineral elements, vitamins, and amino acids. In particular, it has high contents of calcium and iron. The calcium and iron content in every 100 g of fresh fruits can reach 60 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively, seven and six times that of apples. Moreover, they are mainly water-soluble calcium and calcium phosphate, and therefore easily absorbed by the human body [19]. These nutritional components make C. humilis an ideal choice for health-conscious people. Nonetheless, the conveyance and preservation of C. humilis may be influenced by non-living environmental factors like temperature. Therefore, choosing appropriate methods to improve the quality of fruits becomes exceptionally crucial. Gibberellin (GA), as a hormone originating from within plants, is generally regarded as a key signaling molecule in plants. GA, a plant growth regulator, is extensively utilized in agriculture, significantly aiding in seed sprouting, stem extension, fruit growth, and enhancing the plant’s resilience to stress. Therefore, in this study, C. humilis was treated with 0.5 mmol L−1 GA, and the deterioration of the fruits under different treatment times was observed, aiming to provide new ideas for the storage and transportation of C. humilis. There is increasing evidence that the GRF family is also involved in abiotic stress response [20,21]. However, no research has been reported on the connection between the GRF gene of C. humilis and GA treatment. Therefore, we identified the ChGRF gene family of C. humilis and further investigated the changes in the expression of the C. humilis GRF genes under low-temperature GA treatment.
To this end, the project selected C. humilis as material and conducted functional studies of the GRF genes. It is speculated that gibberellin has a delaying effect on the excessive ripening of C. humilis and provides a preservation effect. With the rapid development of genome sequencing technology, the GRF family has been reported in recent years. Based on earlier work, this project aims to investigate the response of ChGRFs to exogenous hormones (gibberellin) via whole-genome sequencing. This project plans to further clarify the GRF gene family in C. humilis by researching aspects such as the structure, evolutionary pattern, chromosomal location, collinearity relationship, and expression pattern of the GRF genes in C. humilis. These results may be helpful for further research on GRF function in C. humilis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Genome sequencing of C. humilis was downloaded from the National Genomics Data Center [22], accessed on 25 December 2024. The GRF protein sequence was downloaded from the TAIR database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 28 December 2024). Access to the GRF protein sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana was obtained from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (https://www.arabidopsis.org (accessed on 28 December 2024)), rice sequences from the Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/analyses_search_locus.shtml (accessed on 28 December 2024)), Chinese cabbage sequences from the Brassica database (http://brassicadb.org/brad/ (accessed on 28 December 2024)), rapeseed sequences from BrassicaDB (http://www.brassicadb.cn (accessed on 28 December 2024)), poplar and maize sequences from Phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html (accessed on 28 December 2024)), and strawberry sequences from the Genome for Rosaceae (https://www.rosaceae.org (accessed on 28 December 2024)). In this study, the samples were taken from the healthy C. humilis in the orchard of Heilongjiang Province, China. This study used healthy dwarf cherries from the Medicinal Plant Garden of Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine as experimental materials. The fruits were immersed in a 0.5 mmol L−1 GA [23,24] solution, stored at 4 °C, and collected after treatment for 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, and 5 d, and repeated the biological process three times to confirm the reliability of the experimental data. The samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C, awaiting RNA extraction. (GA purchased from Beijing Kulaibo Technology Co., Ltd. in China (item number: CG5571)).

2.2. Identification and Characterization of ChGRF Genes

We extracted the CDS [25] sequences of these data using the following formula TBtools-II (v2.136) and convert it into protein sequences, submitted to Plant Transcription Factor Database (PlantTFDB, http://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/index.php, accessed on 28 December 2024) for transcription factor prediction. During candidate sequencing, to further screen for conservative structural domains, we used the CD search tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 28 December 2024) and Pfam database (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/, accessed on 28 December 2024). Download hidden Markov files of WRC (PF08879) and QLQ (PF08880) domains to validate the ChGRF gene family, manually remove redundant sequences, retain the longest gene sequence, and ultimately identify the sequence as a candidate member of the ChGRF gene family. Predicting the physicochemical properties of proteins using the ExPASy website (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 28 December 2024) [26], including the isoelectric point (PI), molecular weight (MW), and chromosomal position (CP) of the proteins of ChGRFs.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis of the ChGRF

In order to gain a better understanding of the ChGRF gene family, the full-length amino acid sequences of nine AtGRF proteins from A. thaliana and twelve ChGRF proteins from C. humilis were aligned using ClustalX (2.1). Based on the following parameters, the MEGA-X11.0.11 [27] software was used to construct the phylogenetic tree of the ChGRF gene family system.

2.4. Collinearity and Evolutionary Gene Analysis

Necessary data for pinpointing the ChGRF gene family’s chromosomal location, encompassing initial and final positions, chromosome length, and count, were acquired through the TBtools-II (v2.136) software in C. humilis genome annotation file. The Circus of TBtools-II was utilized to draw the gene chromosomes. MCScanX (V1.0.0) [28] software was used to identify the repetitive sequences of the GRF gene and conduct visual analysis using TBtools-II.

2.5. Gene Structure and Motifs of ChGRF

The ChGRF sequences were submitted to MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 28 December 2024) [29]. The ChGRF motif was predicted, and the position distribution of each sequence was selected. The number of motifs preserved was fixed at 10, while all other variables were adjusted to their standard values. The TBtools-II software’s Gene Structure View feature was employed, merged with the phylogenetic tree, to display C. humilis’ annotation files. The files encompass coding and non-coding segments of the gene architecture, along with the internal exons and preserved domains.

2.6. Cis-Element Analysis and GO Analysis of the ChGRF Promoter

In this study, the ChGRF gene initiation codon (ATG) was extracted and presented to PlantCare (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 28 December 2024). On the website, cis-acting elements were forecasted using standard settings, and the outcomes of Plantcare analysis were streamlined by incorporating categories related to stress, hormones, and growth. Visualization was conducted using TBtools-II software, while the Evolview website served the purpose of beautification. GO analysis of ChGRF protein sequences (http://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/, accessed on 28 December 2024). The results are displayed on the website.

2.7. Protein–Protein Interaction Network Analysis

The prediction of interactions between C. humilis GRF proteins used the online STRING website (https://cn.string-db.org/, accessed on 28 December 2024). The information is stored in a TSV format and is rendered visually using the Cytoscape software (3.7.2) (www.cytoscape.org). Moreover, we analyzed the three-dimensional structure of the C. humilis GRF genes and visualized them using the Swiss model website (SWISS-MODEL Interactive Workspace) (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive/, accessed on 28 December 2024).

2.8. Expression Analysis of ChGRF Genes in Different Tissues and Developmental Stages

To investigate the differences in the expression patterns of GRF in various tissues, the previously published transcriptome data of C. humilis were used, including the expression in different tissues and at different fruit developmental stages. The transcriptome data were transformed using the Log2 (FPKM + 1) algorithm to determine the gene expression levels. Then, the TBtools-II software was applied to visualize the results of GRF gene expression.

2.9. RNA Extraction Andq qRT-PCR Analysis

Take out the fruits of C. humilis frozen in the −80 °C refrigerator and extract RNA at time intervals after storage. According to the instructions, use the plant total RNA extraction kit (Simgen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). Then, the Surescript TM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Simgen Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) is used to reverse transcribe the total RNA. The test is then performed with a QPCR kit, BlazeTaqTM SYBR ® Green QPCR-Mix 2.0 (Guangzhou, China), and the primers are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The PCR procedure comprises heating for 30 s at 95 °C, then heating for 45 s at 95 °C for 12 s, heating at 58 °C for 30 s, heating at 58 °C for 45 s, and finally for one second at 79 °C. Following a last PCR cycle, raise the temperature at 0.5 °C to 99 °C from 55 °C to 99 °C to create a melting curve for the sample [30]. Internal reference proteins are used as reference genes, and the 2−∆∆Ct technique is employed to measure and compare gene expression [31]. Each sample was tested three times.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of GRF Genes

To determine the GRF gene sequences of C. humilis, the Hidden Markov Model search (HMMER search) method was adopted. The Hidden Markov Models PF08880 (QLQ domain) and PF08879 (WRC domain) were used to verify the candidate GRF genes of C. humilis. BLASTP searches were conducted using the GRF proteins of A. thaliana. As a result, twelve ChGRF genes were identified, and each gene contained the GRF domain. The names of ChGRF were designated as ChGRF1ChGRF12, originating from their distribution on seven chromosomes. Furthermore, we have extended our analysis to the physical and chemical properties of twelve ChGRF proteins. The sequence length ranged from 331 to 1034, and the molecular weight ranged from 36,302.21~117,919.96. The isoelectric point ranged from 5.56 to 9.29. The basic information of each member of the ChGRF family is concisely presented in Supplementary Table S1.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

For a more thorough confirmation of the evolutionary connections among GRF genes, a phylogenetic tree was constructed by comparing the full-length amino acid sequence alignments of nine identified A. thaliana GRFs, twelve rice (Oryza sativa) GRFs, several Fragaria vesca GRFs, nineteen poplar GRFs, fifteen Brassica napus GRFs, seventeen Brassica rapa GRFs, and thirty-five rapeseed GRFs (Supplementary Table S2). The phylogenetic tree is divided into five subgroups (A–E) based on phylogenetic and species evolutionary relationships. Among them, the GRF proteins of C. humilis were split into five lineages. ChGRF1 and ChGRF2 belonged to the D family, ChGRF5 and ChGRF11 belonged to the C family, ChGRF7 belonged to the B family, ChGRF3, ChGRF4, and ChGRF9 belonged to the E family, and ChGRF6, ChGRF8, ChGRF10, and ChGRF12 belonged to the A family (Figure 1).

3.3. Chromosome Localization Analysis

To further study the distribution of the ChGRF gene, this study located all members of the ChGRF gene family on the chromosomes (Figure 2). The ChGRF genes are unevenly distributed on each chromosome. Twelve ChGRF genes are evenly distributed on seven chromosomes. Among them, Chr3 contains the most significant number of ChGRF genes (three members), followed by Chr2, Chr4, and Chr7, each with two ChGRF members, and finally, Chr1, Chr5, and Chr6 each contain one member of the ChGRF gene family. In addition, according to our research findings, there is no direct connection between the length of chromosomes and the number of GRF genes. This distribution pattern of chromosomes is similar to that of the GRF genes in strawberry [32].

3.4. Collinearity and Evolutionary Analysis

As can be seen from the figure, in the genome of C. humilis, six ChGRF genes are located on the duplicated segments, and they are paired with three pairs of segmental duplications (ChGRF1 and ChGRF2), (ChGRF5 and ChGRF11), (ChGRF8 and ChGRF10) (Figure 3A). These duplicated segments are the main driving forces for the evolution of ChGRF genes [33]. In addition, the ChGRF duplicated genes are evenly distributed among subfamilies A, C, and D, indicating that these chromosomal segments may not have undergone complete differentiation during the evolutionary process and may be functionally redundant or superfluous [34].
To conduct a more in-depth study on the occurrence and development of genes in the ChGRF family, we compared three dicotyledonous plants, namely, A. thaliana, Malus pumila Mill, and grapevine, with one monocotyledonous plant, Oryza sativa L. There are six collinear genes between ChGRF and AtGRF, twelve pairs between ChGRF and MmGRF, eight pairs between ChGRF and VvGRF, and three pairs between ChGRF and OsGRF (Figure 3B). Compared with monocotyledonous plants, the number of collinear genes in dicotyledonous plants was higher than that in monocotyledonous plants, among which Malus pumila Mill had a relatively large number of collinear genes.

3.5. Analysis of the GRF Gene Structure and Conserved Motifs

To better understand the genetic structure and distribution of GRF genes in C. humilis, we conducted a detailed study on the gene structures of all twelve GRF genes by using the GSDS online server (Figure 4A). We investigated the intron–exon composition of the 12 ChGRF genes (Figure 4B). The count of introns in the ChGRF genes varied between 0 and 14. Among them, the ChGRF3 gene contained 14 introns, while most genes contained 3 introns, indicating that some introns in the ChGRF genes might have been lost during the evolutionary process. For example, ChGRF10 in subfamily A and ChGRF4 in subfamily E did not contain untranslated regions (UTRs), while ChGRF2, ChGRF5, and ChGRF11 had two coding sequence (CDS) regions and two UTR regions. It was speculated that some members of this subclass might have undergone gene splicing or gene fragment insertion in the evolutionary process [25].
Meanwhile, we also studied their conserved structures. We analyzed 10 representative motifs using the MEME software (5.5.8), selected 10 conserved motifs (Motifs 1–10) from them, and located them in each gene. Our previous studies found that, except for ChGRF9, all the other GRF genes contain Motif 1 and Motif 2. The ChGRF1 gene contains Motif 3, while the ChGRF3 gene contains Motif 6. These three segments form a classic GRF gene family. We speculate that most members in the same branch have similar motifs, indicating that homologous proteins may play similar roles during the evolutionary process. The results of this study further prove that the ChGRF gene family can be divided into different clusters.

3.6. Cis-Elements of ChGRF Genes and Their Functional Analysis

Forecasting of cis-acting elements in the 2000 bp segment before the GRF gene family in C. humilis revealed the presence of several TATA boxes and CAAT boxes in ChGRF, suggesting standard transcription. Using the PlantCRAE website, we successfully identified the cis-elements within the ChGRF genes. We then synthesized and outlined their potential functions, visualizing this information through a comprehensive plot. (Figure 5A). Furthermore, the promoters of the ChGRF genes contain numerous cis-regulatory components. Our analysis pinpointed 302 cis-acting elements, which can be categorized into four groups: those associated with development, environmental stress-related elements, and light-responsive elements (Figure 5B,C). The B-binding site associated with photoreactivity is a major hormone-responsive element that can react with abscisic and salicylic acid. In the upstream ChGRF gene family, the ABA is the most abundant in hormone-related cis-elements. The next largest group is light-sensitive elements with 121 elements (40.1%). The third category consists of elements associated with environmental stress, comprising 63 elements (20.8%). The fourth group is development-related, with 29 elements (9.6%).

3.7. GO Analysis of the ChGRF Gene Family

GO conducted functional verification on twelve ChGRF genes. Previous studies have found that the ChGRF genes possess ten major functional components, molecular functions, and biological processes. During this process, hormones, light, and low temperature can all regulate them. The ChGRF genes are mainly located in the Golgi apparatus cytoplasm, that is, within the chloroplasts. In terms of molecular functions, these genes can bind to proteins both at the post-transcriptional and molecular levels and can also assist in their expression (Figure 6).

3.8. Protein–Protein Interaction Network Analysis and Homology Modeling

Using the STRING database, we predicted the protein–protein interaction characteristics of the ChGRF family. In Figure 7A, a node represents the name of a protein. When the number of nodes connected to a node increases, its degree value will become larger. The node’s dimensions and the color’s depth signify the degree value. Studies have shown that ChGRF1 is highly expressed and interacts strongly with other proteins. These results suggest that this protein is vital in regulating plant growth.
The SWISS-MODEL interactive workspace website was used to predict the twelve types of ChGRF further. The results showed that the RMSD for the majority of ChGRF proteins after superposition was below 1, suggesting the reliability of the prediction (Figure 7B). Therefore, the study of the 3D spatial structure of ChGRF is critical to elucidate its biological function.

3.9. Analysis of ChGRF Gene Expression

To delve deeper into the possible functions of ChGRF genes, our research focused on examining their expression across other tissues and growth phases. Figure 8A shows the expression profiles of the ChGRF genes in different tissues. Among them, six members (ChGRF1, ChGRF2, ChGRF3, ChGRF8, ChGRF9, ChGRF12) had high expression levels in flowers. Eight members had high expression levels in fruits (ChGRF1, ChGRF2, ChGRF3, ChGRF8, ChGRF9, ChGRF10, ChGRF11, ChGRF12). Two genes are highly expressed in leaves (ChGRF3, ChGRF9). ChGRF3, ChGRF9, ChGRF10, and ChGRF12 had high expression levels in roots. ChGRF1, ChGRF2, ChGRF3, ChGRF9, ChGRF10, and ChGRF12 had high expression levels in stems. ChGRF4, ChGRF5, and ChGRF6 were expressed in all tissues; however, their expression levels were relatively low. While ChGRF7 was not expressed in the tissue parts shown in the figure below, this does not mean that it is not expressed. This could manifest in different tissues or throughout various growth and development phases. The expression patterns of ChGRF genes during various developmental phases of C. humilis are depicted in Figure 8B. There were three replicates at each developmental stage. A total of eight members (ChGRF2, ChGRF4, ChGRF5, ChGRF6, ChGRF8, ChGRF10, ChGRF11, ChGRF12) had higher expression levels in the young fruit stage than in the other three stages. The findings suggest that these genes are crucial in the growth and maturation of C. humilis fruits, having developed distinct regulatory mechanisms.

3.10. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

To investigate the role of ChGRF genes, the effect of exogenous hormone GA on the expression of ChGRF was investigated, resulting in twelve specific ChGRF genes being analyzed. A comparative analysis was conducted on C. humilis fruits that underwent GA treatment for 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, and 5 d. The results showed that as the storage time prolonged, the degree of surface folding of C. humilis fruits increased and the degree of fruit softening became more severe (Figure 9).
Based on this heat map, screening and analysis were carried out using qRT-PCR (Figure 10). The impact of gibberellin on the preservation effect of apple fruits was studied. The expression of ChGRF11 and ChGRF12 was first reduced, then increased, while ChGRF1, ChGRF2, ChGRF6, and ChGRF8 tended to rise and decrease. ChGRF9 and ChGRF10 were highest at 0 h. Through verification using qRT-PCR, we found that the ChGRF genes showed differential expression during the gibberellin response process and might cooperate in development (Supplementary Table S3).

4. Discussion

Not only can the fruit of C. humilis be eaten fresh, but it can also be made into wine, fruit juice, jam, and sweets [35]. In addition, due to its high content of flavonoids, the fruits of C. humilis can serve as an effective natural antioxidant and prevent damage to the human body caused by free radicals to varying degrees. It has high application potential in the medical and healthcare industries [36]. Therefore, studying and analyzing the transcription factors related to fruit quality is essential. The plant-specific GRFs act as attractants and play a key role in regulating the different stages of plant growth and development and in a number of aspects of the response to stress. There has been no research on the GRF genes of C. humilis. A comprehensive analysis of ChGRFs was conducted, focusing on their expression changes in fruits during the storage process and after treatment with the GA hormone.
GA3 enhances seed sprouting and affects protein metabolism through the regulation of hydrolysis in embryonic reserve tissues. When present in sufficient amounts in seeds, GA3 enhances cell growth by prompting the primary roots to fracture tissues that hinder their development [37]. Similarly, gibberellins affect protein metabolism by creating enzymes that compromise the seed coat, playing a part in the growth and extension of the primary root.
Santos and colleagues (2016) noted enhanced vitality in Passiflora alata Curtis seeds when submerged in GA3 solution at 500 mg/L and 1000 mg/L levels. Additionally, gibberellins neutralize the suppression caused by abscisic acid, leading to a natural rise in GA3 levels, showcasing their function in breaking down seed dormancy and improving the physical condition of seedlings [37]. This has been confirmed in grape varieties such as Thompson Seedless [24] and Syrah [38]. Moreover, the application of red elements can improve the quality of pre-grape fruits, enhance their commercial value, and increase economic benefits.
Twelve ChGRFs in C. humilis were identified. We constructed the phylogenetic trees of ChGRF, AtGRF, BnGRF, BrGRF, PtGRF, FvGRF, ZmGRF, and OsGRF proteins. Based on the 12 kinds of ChGRF proteins and 9 kinds of AtGRF proteins, they were divided into five groups (Groups A–E). The ChGRF proteins were evenly distributed among these five groups. From a phylogenetic point of view, an analysis of the subfamily standings of various ChGRF gene family members revealed significant homology and structural resemblance among those grouped in the same branch [2]. It has been shown that ChGRF1 and ChGRF2 are homologous to AtGRF1 and are highly expressed in the roots. The expression of OsGRF10 was high in the rice leaf [39]. ChGRF12, ChGRF10, and ChGRF6 were found to be homozygous and highly expressed in leaves. It is speculated that this group has relatively high functions in leaves. Under normal circumstances, the expression level of GRF genes in vigorously growing tissues is higher than that in mature tissues [7]. This indicates that, as both are dicotyledonous plants, their taxonomical conclusions are basically the same. This suggests that ChGRF has good gene structure stability. Despite some differences, the phylogenetic tree is mainly consistent with the results of earlier studies [40]. Genes with similar functions tend to be classified into the same subclass, which offers a crucial basis for predicting gene functions [25].
Gene duplication promotes the generation and function of new genes, significantly influencing the evolutionary process. During the evolutionary process, there are three ways of gene duplication: segmental duplication, tandem duplication, and translocation events. In expanding plant gene families, segmental and tandem duplication are mainly observed. Chromosome localization analysis revealed their irregular distribution on seven chromosomes. A total of six segmental duplications were identified, while there were only three tandem duplications between ChGRF1 and ChGRF7, ChGRF5 and ChGRF11, and ChGRF8 and ChGRF10 [20,41]. Changes in the upstream and the coding regions may influence the function of the duplicated genes [42]. Comparative studies of the C. humilis genome with the genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, apple, grape, and rice plants have shown significant collinearity between C. humilis GRF and dicotyledonous plants.
The configuration of genes and the spread of motifs offer corroborative proof for the evolutionary links between various species or genes. The analysis of amino acid sequences indicated that the ChGRF genes shared the same gene structure and motif, suggesting that the GRF had similar functions in the same branch [43,44]. Besides the GRF domains, ten different motifs were also found, which are distributed differently in ChGRF. There is a close relationship between intron differentiation and the evolution of plants. There are often similar exon–introns and quantificational distributions in the same subfamily.
In the promoter region, cis-acting elements are essential to control gene expression [45] and play a key role in controlling the expression of downstream associated genes during the transcription phase, thereby increasing the plant’s resistance to pressures from the outside world. At 2000 bp upstream of the promoter, we identified a number of ChGRF responses.
GRF is key in synthesizing plant hormones, stress response, and regulation. Adverse environmental stress is a significant constraint on crop growth and the improvement of agricultural product quality [46]. As a key regulatory protein, GRF plays an essential role in regulating hormonal signals [47]. The growth regulator (GRF) in tobacco is a key transcription factor in GA biosynthesis [15]. We analyzed the ChGRF sequences and found multiple hormone-regulatory elements in ChGRFs, suggesting that ChGRFs may play an essential role in hormone signal transduction [48].
More and more evidence has emerged that genes play an essential role in plant development [49]. Generally, gene expression patterns are key indicators for predicting gene functions [50]. The GA signaling pathway plays an important regulatory role in plant stress conditions. Among the GFR genes of C. humilis, ChGRF2 reached the highest expression level 3 d after GA treatment, ChGRF3 reached the highest level at 24 h, ChGRF6 had the highest expression at 3 d, and ChGRF4, ChGRF11, and ChGRF12 reached the highest levels at 5 d. Based on previous speculation, we can conclude that gibberellin specifically delays excessive fruit ripening and preservation. Through fluorescence quantitative PCR, it was found that the delay in excessive maturation under gibberellin treatment may be due to the role of ChGRF genes. Therefore, our study is very necessary to provide a theoretical basis for understanding the function of GRF genes.

5. Conclusions

This research pinpointed 12 individuals belonging to the ChGRF gene family for the first time. These elements are spread across seven chromosomes in the C. humilis genome, each housing QLQ and WRC domains. Based on the evolutionary connections among species, it was segmented into five distinct categories. Family members exhibit preserved exon–intron configurations, motifs, and categories. At the same time, gibberellin has a preservative effect on C. humilis fruit, and it is further speculated that ChGRF2, ChGRF6, and ChGRF12 may play a key role. In summary, this is a preliminary study of the GRF gene family in C. humilis fruits, providing a reference for further investigating the functions of GRF genes in different species and expanding our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of C. humilis fruit’s response to gibberellin.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology14070763/s1, Table S1: Chromosomal location, and subfamilial classification of the encoded protein for Cerasus humilis ChGRF family members; Table S2: Primers used for this study; Table S3: GRF genes were identified in Arabidopsis thaliana, Fragaria vesca, Oryza sativa L, Populus L, Zea mays L, and Brassica napus L.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.K. and L.M.; methodology, S.J.; software, X.Z.; validation, J.M. and M.P.; data curation, W.W.; writing—original draft preparation, L.K.; writing—review and editing, W.L.; visualization, W.R.; supervision, W.M.; funding acquisition, W.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by National Key Research and Development Project, research and demonstration of collection, screening, and breeding technology of ginseng and other genuine medicinal materials, Project No. 2021YFD1600901, The sponsor is the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China; Heilongjiang Province “double first-class” discipline collaborative innovation achievement project: Quality optimization and deep processing of characteristic Chinese medicinal materials in the lower cold region of great health industry, Project No. LJGXCG2023-058, The sponsor is the Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, China; Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program (Grant Number: [2019] No. 5), The sponsor is the Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in the main text and its Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hoe Kim, J.; Tsukaya, H. Regulation of plant growth and development by the GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR duo. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6093–6107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bao, M.; Bian, H.; Zha, Y.; Li, F.; Sun, Y.; Bai, B.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhu, M.; Han, N. miR396a-Mediated Basic Helix–Loop–Helix Transcription Factor bHLH74 Repression Acts as a Regulator for Root Growth in Arabidopsis Seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1343–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Debernardi, J.M.; Mecchia, M.A.; Vercruyssen, L.; Smaczniak, C.; Kaufmann, K.; Inze, D.; Rodriguez, R.E.; Palatnik, J.F. Post-transcriptional control of GRF transcription factors by microRNA miR396 and GIF co-activator affects leaf size and longevity. Plant J. 2014, 79, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, H.; Guo, S.; Xu, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Xu, S.; Zhang, C.; Chong, K. OsmiR396d-Regulated OsGRFs Function in Floral Organogenesis in Rice through Binding to Their Targets OsJMJ706 and OsCR4. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Omidbakhshfard, M.A.; Proost, S.; Fujikura, U.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Growth-Regulating Factors (GRFs): A Small Transcription Factor Family with Important Functions in Plant Biology. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 998–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khatun, K.; Robin, A.H.K.; Park, J.-I.; Nath, U.K.; Kim, C.K.; Lim, K.-B.; Nou, I.S.; Chung, M.-Y. Molecular Characterization and Expression Profiling of Tomato GRF Transcription Factor Family Genes in Response to Abiotic Stresses and Phytohormones. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dongsu Choi, J.H.K.H.K. Whole Genome Analysis of the OsGRF Gene Family Encoding Plant-Specific Putative Transcription Activators in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 2004, 45, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, F.; Qiu, N.; Ding, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Gao, J. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the growth-regulating factor family in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. van der Knaap, E.; Kim, J.H.; Kende, H. A Novel Gibberellin-Induced Gene from Rice and Its Potential Regulatory Role in Stem Growth. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Horiguchi, G.; Kim, G.T.; Tsukaya, H. The transcription factor AtGRF5 and the transcription coactivator AN3 regulate cell proliferation in leaf primordia of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005, 43, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liang, G.; He, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Yu, D. Molecular Mechanism of microRNA396 Mediating Pistil Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 164, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lee, S.-J.; Lee, B.H.; Jung, J.-H.; Park, S.K.; Song, J.T.; Kim, J.H. GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR Specify Meristematic Cells of Gynoecia and Anthers. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, S.; Gao, F.; Xie, K.; Zeng, X.; Cao, Y.; Zeng, J.; He, Z.; Ren, Y.; Li, W.; Deng, Q.; et al. The OsmiR396c-OsGRF4-OsGIF1 regulatory module determines grain size and yield in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 2134–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Che, R.; Tong, H.; Shi, B.; Liu, Y.; Fang, S.; Liu, D.; Xiao, Y.; Hu, B.; Liu, L.; Wang, H.; et al. Control of grain size and rice yield by GL2-mediated brassinosteroid responses. Nat. Plants 2015, 2, 15195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Jin, J.; Xie, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Q.; Luo, Z.; Yang, J. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the growth-regulating factor family in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Gene 2018, 639, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, G.-Z.; Huang, J.; Zhou, X.-Q.; Hao, Y.; Chen, J.-L.; Zhou, Y.-Z.; Ahmad, S.; Lan, S.; Liu, Z.-J.; Peng, D.-H. Comprehensive Analysis for GRF Transcription Factors in Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, Q.; Yuan, R.-Y.; Feng, C.-Y.; Li, S.-S.; Wang, L.-S. Analysis of Polyphenols Composition and Antioxidant Activity Assessment of Chinese Dwarf Cherry (Cerasus humilis (Bge.) Sok.). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X19856509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, P.; Mu, X.; Du, J.; Gao, Y.G.; Bai, D.; Jia, L.; Zhang, J.; Ren, H.; Xue, X. Flavonoid content and radical scavenging activity in fruits of Chinese dwarf cherry (Cerasus humilis) genotypes. J. For. Res. 2017, 29, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, P.; Yi, S.; Mu, X.; Zhang, J.; Du, J. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Cerasus humilis Using PacBio and Hi-C Technologies. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, B.; Huang, Z.; Ma, R.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yrjälä, K. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of LBD transcription factor genes in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, S.; Ren, W.; Ma, L.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wu, W.; Kong, L.; He, J.; Ma, W.; Liu, X. Identification of the lateral organ boundary domain gene family and its preservation by exogenous salicylic acid in Cerasus humilis. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2024, 30, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao, Y.; Fu, G.; Jiang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Sun, J.; Wang, Q.; Liu, D.; Luo, Z.; et al. Chromosome-scale Cerasus humilis genome assembly reveals gene family evolution and possible genomic basis of calcium accumulation in fruits. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 299, 111012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, S.; Bai, Y.; Shen, C.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, D.; Guilfoyle, T.J.; Chen, M.; Qi, Y. Auxin-related gene families in abiotic stress response in Sorghum bicolor. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2010, 10, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jadhav, U.; Mundhe, S.; Kumar, Y.; Jogaiah, S.; Upadhyay, A.; Gupta, V.S.; Kadoo, N.Y. Gibberellic Acid Induces Unique Molecular Responses in ‘Thompson Seedless’ Grapes as Revealed by Non-targeted Metabolomics. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 40, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Song, B.; Tang, Z.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, K.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J. Mining and evolution analysis of lateral organ boundaries domain (LBD) genes in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Artimo, P.; Jonnalagedda, M.; Arnold, K.; Baratin, D.; Csardi, G.; de Castro, E.; Duvaud, S.; Flegel, V.; Fortier, A.; Gasteiger, E.; et al. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, W597–W603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016, 33, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; DeBarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.h.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, P.; Qin, C.; He, L.; Kong, L.; Ren, W.; Liu, X.; Ma, W. Genome-wide identification of the NAC transcription factors family and regulation of metabolites under salt stress in Isatis indigotica. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 240, 124436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. LiLi, Z.; Xie, Q.; Yan, J.; Chen, J.; Chen, Q. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Abiotic-Stress-Responsive GRF Gene Family in Diploid Woodland Strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Plants 2021, 10, 1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lynch, M.; Conery, J.S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 2000, 290, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kong, L.; Sun, J.; Jiang, Z.; Ren, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Ma, W.; Xu, J. Identification and expression analysis of YABBY family genes in Platycodon grandiflorus. Plant Signal. Behav. 2023, 18, 2163069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, W.; Ren, W.; Liu, X.; He, L.; Qin, C.; Wang, P.; Kong, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, W. Identification and characterization of Dof genes in Cerasus humilis. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, B.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, H.; Ma, H.; Dong, A.; Huang, H. Arabidopsis GenesAS1,AS2, andJAGNegatively Regulate Boundary-Specifying Genes to Promote Sepal and Petal Development. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 323–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Santos, T.P.; Sá, M.E.; Malagutti, E.S.; Pinto, M.S.; Ferreira, A.F.A.; Monteiro, L.N.H.; Silva, A.C.C. Effects of gibberellic acid concentration and fruit maturation stage on seed germination and vigor of pitahaya seedlings. Braz J Biol. 2022, 3, e260650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xie, S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Yang, B.; Ge, M.; Zhang, Z. Effects of gibberellin applications before flowering on the phenotype, ripening, and flavonoid compounds of Syrah grape berries. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 6100–6111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rodriguez, R.E.; Mecchia, M.A.; Debernardi, J.M.; Schommer, C.; Weigel, D.; Palatnik, J.F. Control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development 2010, 137, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liang, J.; Hou, Z.; Liao, J.; Qin, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Su, W.; Cai, Z.; Fang, Y.; Aslam, M.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of LBD Transcription Factor Genes in Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iwakawa, H.; Ueno, Y.; Semiarti, E.; Onouchi, H.; Kojima, S.; Tsukaya, H.; Hasebe, M.; Soma, T.; Ikezaki, M.; Machida, C.; et al. The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana, required for formation of a symmetric flat leaf lamina, encodes a member of a novel family of proteins characterized by cysteine repeats and a leucine zipper. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Derelli Tufekci, E. Genome-wide identification and analysis of Lateral Organ Boundaries Domain (LBD) transcription factor gene family in melon (Cucumis melo L.). PeerJ 2023, 11, e16020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kim JH, K.H. A transcriptional coactivator, AtGIF1, is involved in regulating leaf growth and morphology in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 13374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, X.; Guo, L.-X.; Jin, L.-F.; Liu, Y.-Z.; Liu, T.; Fan, Y.-H.; Peng, S.-A. Identification and transcript profiles of citrus growth-regulating factor genes involved in the regulation of leaf and fruit development. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2016, 43, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yao, W.; Zhao, K.; Liu, L.; Fan, G.; Zhou, B.; Jiang, T. Genome-wide search and structural and functional analyses for late embryogenesis-abundant (LEA) gene family in poplar. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.; Tu, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Li, H. Genome-wide identification of GROWTH-REGULATING FACTORs in Liriodendron chinense and functional characterization of LcGRF2 in leaf size regulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 206, 108204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chang, I.F.; Curran, A.; Woolsey, R.; Quilici, D.; Cushman, J.C.; Mittler, R.; Harmon, A.; Harper, J.F. Proteomic profiling of tandem affinity purified 14-3-3 protein complexes inArabidopsis thaliana. Proteomics 2009, 9, 2967–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sakuma, Y.; Liu, Q.; Dubouzet, J.G.; Abe, H.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. DNA-Binding Specificity of the ERF/AP2 Domain of Arabidopsis DREBs, Transcription Factors Involved in Dehydration- and Cold-Inducible Gene Expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 290, 998–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nawaz, T.; Nelson, D.; Saleem, A.; Bibi, M.; Joshi, N.; Fahad, S.; Saud, S.; Adnan, M.; Rasheed Khan, M.N.; Hassan, S.; et al. Genetic Engineering for Crop Biofortification. In Crop Biofortification; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2025; pp. 263–294. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, X.; He, Y.; He, W.; Su, H.; Wang, Y.; Hong, G.; Xu, P. Structural and functional insights into the LBD family involved in abiotic stress and flavonoid synthases in Camellia sinensis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic and classification analysis of GRF proteins in C. humilis, Fragaria vesca, poplar, Brassica napus, Brassica rapa, A. thaliana, Zea mays, and Oryza sativa. A. B, C, D, and E represent five different subfamilies. Branches are represented by different colors to indicate GRF subfamilies. C. humilis is indicated by a red five-pointed star; strawberry is represented by a pink circle; poplar is indicated by a blue tick; rapeseed is represented by a light-colored triangle; Chinese cabbage is represented by a blue circle; A. thaliana is represented by a green triangle; maize is represented by a green triangle; and rice is represented by a yellow tick.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic and classification analysis of GRF proteins in C. humilis, Fragaria vesca, poplar, Brassica napus, Brassica rapa, A. thaliana, Zea mays, and Oryza sativa. A. B, C, D, and E represent five different subfamilies. Branches are represented by different colors to indicate GRF subfamilies. C. humilis is indicated by a red five-pointed star; strawberry is represented by a pink circle; poplar is indicated by a blue tick; rapeseed is represented by a light-colored triangle; Chinese cabbage is represented by a blue circle; A. thaliana is represented by a green triangle; maize is represented by a green triangle; and rice is represented by a yellow tick.
Biology 14 00763 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of the ChGRF gene in C. humilis genome. The chromosome localization of each ChGRF gene was determined according to the genome assembly of C. humilis. Each chromosome’s number is displayed atop the chromosome.
Figure 2. Distribution of the ChGRF gene in C. humilis genome. The chromosome localization of each ChGRF gene was determined according to the genome assembly of C. humilis. Each chromosome’s number is displayed atop the chromosome.
Biology 14 00763 g002
Figure 3. Chromosome localization and interspecific collinearity analysis: (A) The grey lines represent all collinearity genes in the C. humilis genome, and the red line represents the tandem replication line relationship between ChGRF genes. (B) Collinear relationship between C. humilis and other species. The red lines represent collinear gene pairs.
Figure 3. Chromosome localization and interspecific collinearity analysis: (A) The grey lines represent all collinearity genes in the C. humilis genome, and the red line represents the tandem replication line relationship between ChGRF genes. (B) Collinear relationship between C. humilis and other species. The red lines represent collinear gene pairs.
Biology 14 00763 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic and conserved motif analysis of ChGRF: ((A) ChGRF conserved motif analysis; (B) exon–intron structure analysis. Yellow blocks, black lines, and green blocks, respectively, denote exons, introns, and non-coding region).
Figure 4. Phylogenetic and conserved motif analysis of ChGRF: ((A) ChGRF conserved motif analysis; (B) exon–intron structure analysis. Yellow blocks, black lines, and green blocks, respectively, denote exons, introns, and non-coding region).
Biology 14 00763 g004
Figure 5. Analysis of cis-regulatory elements of ChGRF genes in C. humilis: ((A) Distribution of cis-acting elements in the promoter region of the ChGRF gene. (B,C) ChGRF gene promoter. Yellow represents light response elements, orange represents environmental stress-related elements, gray represents hormone response elements, and blue represents development-related elements).
Figure 5. Analysis of cis-regulatory elements of ChGRF genes in C. humilis: ((A) Distribution of cis-acting elements in the promoter region of the ChGRF gene. (B,C) ChGRF gene promoter. Yellow represents light response elements, orange represents environmental stress-related elements, gray represents hormone response elements, and blue represents development-related elements).
Biology 14 00763 g005
Figure 6. GO annotations of members of the ChGRF gene family: (A) green represents biological processes, orange represents cellular components, and purple represents molecular functions. (B) GO term enrichment analysis of ChGRF genes.
Figure 6. GO annotations of members of the ChGRF gene family: (A) green represents biological processes, orange represents cellular components, and purple represents molecular functions. (B) GO term enrichment analysis of ChGRF genes.
Biology 14 00763 g006
Figure 7. Protein interaction analysis and three-dimensional structure diagrams of ChGRF genes: (A) ChGRF protein interaction network; (B) three-dimensional structure of ChGRF gene.
Figure 7. Protein interaction analysis and three-dimensional structure diagrams of ChGRF genes: (A) ChGRF protein interaction network; (B) three-dimensional structure of ChGRF gene.
Biology 14 00763 g007
Figure 8. Analysis of ChGRF gene expression: (A) The expression of ChGRF in different tissue sites. (B) The different manifestations of ChGRF in fruits of different colors (GF: green fruit; RF: red fruit; SRF: small red fruit; YF: yellow fruit).
Figure 8. Analysis of ChGRF gene expression: (A) The expression of ChGRF in different tissue sites. (B) The different manifestations of ChGRF in fruits of different colors (GF: green fruit; RF: red fruit; SRF: small red fruit; YF: yellow fruit).
Biology 14 00763 g008
Figure 9. Phenotypic characteristics analysis of C. humilis under gibberellin treatment (0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, 5 d).
Figure 9. Phenotypic characteristics analysis of C. humilis under gibberellin treatment (0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, 5 d).
Biology 14 00763 g009
Figure 10. qRT-PCR analysis of ChGRF genes under GA hormone treatment. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the significance of copper stress treatment for 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, 5 d, and CK samples (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 10. qRT-PCR analysis of ChGRF genes under GA hormone treatment. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the significance of copper stress treatment for 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, 5 d, and CK samples (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).
Biology 14 00763 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kong, L.; Ma, L.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, X.; Ma, J.; Pan, M.; Wu, W.; Liu, W.; Ren, W.; Ma, W. Genome-Wide Identification, Exogenous Hormone Response, Gene Structure, and Conserved Motif Analysis of the GRF Gene Family in Cerasus humilis. Biology 2025, 14, 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070763

AMA Style

Kong L, Ma L, Jiang S, Zhang X, Ma J, Pan M, Wu W, Liu W, Ren W, Ma W. Genome-Wide Identification, Exogenous Hormone Response, Gene Structure, and Conserved Motif Analysis of the GRF Gene Family in Cerasus humilis. Biology. 2025; 14(7):763. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070763

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kong, Lingyang, Lengleng Ma, Shan Jiang, Xinyi Zhang, Junbai Ma, Meitong Pan, Wei Wu, Weili Liu, Weichao Ren, and Wei Ma. 2025. "Genome-Wide Identification, Exogenous Hormone Response, Gene Structure, and Conserved Motif Analysis of the GRF Gene Family in Cerasus humilis" Biology 14, no. 7: 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070763

APA Style

Kong, L., Ma, L., Jiang, S., Zhang, X., Ma, J., Pan, M., Wu, W., Liu, W., Ren, W., & Ma, W. (2025). Genome-Wide Identification, Exogenous Hormone Response, Gene Structure, and Conserved Motif Analysis of the GRF Gene Family in Cerasus humilis. Biology, 14(7), 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070763

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop