Next Article in Journal
Biparental Inheritance and Instability of kDNA in Experimental Hybrids of Trypanosoma cruzi: A Proposal for a Mechanism
Previous Article in Journal
Detectability of Crown-of-Thorns Starfish and Consequences for Culling or Removal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hepatocyte Growth Factor Differentially Modulates Oral Microbiota in Early vs. Late Experimental Periodontitis

1
School of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
2
Department of Periodontology, Jinan Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Binzhou Medical College, Yantai 264000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2025, 14(10), 1393; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14101393 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 August 2025 / Revised: 4 October 2025 / Accepted: 8 October 2025 / Published: 11 October 2025

Abstract

Simple Summary

Periodontitis is a chronic disease caused by an imbalance in oral bacteria. We previously found that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) can protect against early-stage disease but worsen it later. In this study, we examined how HGF affects bacteria attached to ligatures placed around teeth in mice with periodontitis. We compared normal mice and mice with high HGF levels, analyzing bacterial composition, inflammatory markers, and bone metabolism indicators at different disease stages. HGF significantly changed bacterial diversity and composition over time. Some bacteria, like Lactobacillus, showed opposite patterns in early and late stages, matching the different effects of HGF. Certain bacteria were linked to inflammation and bone loss, and predicted inflammatory pathways varied with disease stage. These findings suggest HGF shapes bacterial communities in ways that may explain its stage-dependent impact on periodontitis.

Abstract

Background: Periodontitis is a chronic disease triggered by disturbed oral microbiota. We have previously reported that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) could mitigate early-stage experimental periodontitis but exacerbate the condition in its late stage. Here, we investigated the impact of HGF on the periodontal microbiome during periodontitis progression. Methods: We established ligation-induced periodontitis in wild-type (WT) mice and HGF high-expression transgenic (HGF-Tg) mice. We quantified the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in periodontal tissues, as well as the serum concentrations of CTXI and PINP. Ligatures were collected on days 0, 7, and 28 after ligation for 16S rRNA sequencing and microbial analysis. Results: HGF significantly altered the diversity of ligatures during periodontitis. Interestingly, specific microbial genera, such as Lactobacillus, exhibited opposing trends between the two disease stages of HGF-Tg mice, aligning with the different effects of HGF on periodontitis progression. We also identified some taxa, such as Sphingomonas, associated with IL-6, TNF-α, CTXI, and PINP. The predicted inflammatory pathways (e.g., IL-17 signaling pathways) were enriched in HGF-Tg mice on day 28 but decreased on day 7. Conclusions: HGF exerted different influences on the microbiota of ligatures during early and late stages of periodontitis, which may account for the divergent effects of HGF on periodontitis progression.

1. Introduction

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by the progressive degradation of periodontal tissues [1]. It is widely accepted that periodontitis is instigated by oral microbial dysbiosis, characterized by distinct alterations in microbial structure, composition, and metabolic activities [2,3]. Specific pathogens and their virulence factors have been shown to promote the progression of periodontitis [4,5,6]. Clinical evidence and animal experiments have also revealed that targeting microbial imbalances can be an effective treatment for periodontitis [7,8,9]. Although the contribution of periodontitis-associated species cannot be ignored, the comprehensive interaction between the entire microbial community and the host response may play a more important role in the progression of periodontitis [2]. On the one hand, dysbiosis of the periodontal microbiome drives both local and systemic host responses that exacerbate inflammation and tissue degradation [10]. On the other hand, the specific oral microenvironment and host responses, influenced by the microbial community, may further create conditions conducive to the proliferation of periodontitis-associated pathogens and microbial imbalance [11,12]. Active management of inflammation led to the natural elimination of periodontal pathogens without the need for mechanical or antimicrobial treatments [13]. Overall, susceptibility to periodontitis and subsequent tissue damage is influenced by the interplay between bacteria and host response [2].
Multiple cytokines, such as human growth factors, have been reported to be involved in the interaction between the host response and microbiome alteration during periodontitis [14]. Current research has also highlighted hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a pleiotropic cytokine, responsible for inflammatory and immune responses in various diseases [15]. Elevated levels of HGF in oral rinse and gingival cervical fluids (GCFs) were associated with the severity of periodontitis [16]. A recent study also demonstrated a negative correlation between serum HGF levels and the abundance of Firmicutes in gut microbiota [17]. However, direct mechanistic evidence from genetically modified models, such as HGF overexpression or knockout mice, remains lacking, and no prior research has specifically explored the role of HGF in shaping the oral microbiota.
Our preliminary findings revealed that HGF played a protective role in the early stage of experimental periodontitis but exacerbated the bone destruction and inflammation in the late phase [18]. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that HGF exerts stage-specific effects on periodontitis, which are associated with distinct changes in microbiota at different stages. This study aims to elucidate the impact of HGF on the microbiota of ligatures using ligature-induced periodontitis in wild-type (WT) and HGF high-expression transgenic (HGF-Tg) mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Twelve wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 (control, C) and twelve HGF high-expression transgenic (HGF-Tg, H) male mice aged 6 weeks were used in this study. Wild-type mice were purchased from Guangdong Experimental Animal Center (Guangzhou, China). The creation and genotyping of HGF-Tg mice were conducted in accordance with protocols previously established [18,19]. In brief, these mice exhibit elevated HGF expression in oral tissues [18]. The mice were housed under standardized conditions of humidity (50–60%) and temperature (20–24 °C) with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle. The Guangdong Huawei Testing Co., Ltd.’s (Guangzhou, China) Animal Research Ethics Committee approved all animal care and experimental protocols (Approval No. HWT-BG-117).

2.2. Ligature-Induced Periodontitis (LIP) Model

A ligature-induced periodontitis model was established by placing a 5-0 silk around the right maxillary second molar, following established procedures [18]. The mice were randomly divided into six groups: WT mice ligated for 0 days (C0); WT mice ligated for 7 days (C7); WT mice ligated for 28 days (C28); HGF-Tg mice ligated for 0 days (H0); HGF-Tg mice ligated for 7 days (H7); HGF-Tg mice ligated for 28 days (H28). Ligation for 7 days was classified as the early stage of periodontitis, and ligation for 28 days was defined as the late stage of periodontitis [20]. Ligatures were collected and stored at −80 °C under sterile conditions for use as previously described [10]. The periodontal tissues surrounding the teeth affected by periodontitis and the serum were collected and stored at −80 °C.

2.3. Protein Expression Analysis by ELISA

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels in periodontal tissue around the teeth were assessed using mouse ELISA Kits following the manufacturer’s instructions (Cusabio, Wuhan, China). The levels of C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTXI) and procollagen I N-terminal pro-peptide (PINP) in serum were determined using mouse ELISA Kits in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines (Elabscience, Wuhan, China). These measurements have been previously reported [18], and the data were used here to examine correlations with the oral microbiota composition.

2.4. 16S rRNA Sequencing, Bioinformatic, and Statistical Analysis

Following the sample collection of ligatures, DNA extraction was performed using E.Z.N.A.® soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA), with subsequent quantification of DNA concentration and assessment of purity. PCR amplification of the V3–V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene was then carried out using the previous primers on an ABI GeneAmp® 9700 PCR thermocycler (ABI, Vernon, CA, USA), with optimization of PCR conditions for specificity and yield [21]. After library preparation, sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using standard protocols provided by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Bioinformatic microbiome of ligatures was analyzed on the Majorbio Cloud platform (http://cloud.majorbio.com, accessed on 20 February 2025) [22]. Data analysis encompassed quality control and trimming of raw reads, as well as classification of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 97% sequence similarity level [23]. Subsequent to rarefaction, α-diversity indices were measured by Mothur v1.30.1, and β-diversity was visualized by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity [24]. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was employed to determine the significant taxa of bacteria among the different groups, with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score > 3 and p < 0.05 [25]. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to identify the relationship between clinical parameters and oral microbiota [26]. Spearman correlations were also conducted to delineate the relationship between taxa and environmental indices. PICRUSt2 analysis and STAMP software (version 2.1.0) facilitated the prediction and verification of distinct microbial pathways [27,28].
Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism version 8.0 or R software (version 4.2.2). The Gaussian distribution of the data was evaluated with the Shapiro–Wilk test, while Levene’s test was used to assess the homogeneity of variances. Multigroup comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA for normally distributed data and the Kruskal–Wallis test for non-normally distributed data. Depending on the data distribution, we employed either Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. HGF Altered LIP Microbial Diversity During Periodontitis Development

In both WT and HGF-Tg mice, α-diversity significantly decreased on days 7 and 28 compared to day 0 (p < 0.01), indicating a reduction in microbial diversity as periodontitis developed (Figure 1A). On days 0 and 7, the α-diversity was not different between the WT and HGF-Tg mice. However, HGF-Tg mice presented statistically higher α-diversity compared with WT mice on day 28 (p < 0.05) (Figure 1A). Differences between the LIP microbial construction of groups were analyzed by PCoA (β-diversity) and cluster analysis. Generally, the ligature microbial community of LIP groups on different time points tended to cluster separately at the genus level when compared with the controls (Figure 1B,F). It was also worth noting that the H7 group exhibited distinct segregation from other LIP groups according to the PCoA plot (Figure 1B). At baseline, the microbial compositions in ligature sites from HGF-Tg and WT mice were similar (p ≥ 0.05) (Figure 1C). Significant differences in ligature microbiota were observed between HGF-Tg and WT mice on day 7 (Figure 1D), as well as between the two groups on day 28 (p < 0.05) (Figure 1E).

3.2. HGF Contributed to Community Shifts in LIP During Periodontitis Progression

A stacked bar chart illustrated the difference in dominant taxa among all groups at the phylum and genus levels (Figure 2A,B). H7 group showed distinctly different composition compared with C7, C28, and H28 groups at the genus level (Figure 2B). The LEfSe analysis further revealed alterations in the oral microbiota of WT and HGF-Tg mice with periodontitis compared with controls (Figure 2C,D). On day 7, the proportions of class_Gammaproteobacteria and genus_Streptococcus were elevated in both WT and HGF-Tg mice. On day 28, an increased enrichment of order_Bacillales was observed in both WT and HGF-Tg mice (Figure 2C,D). The above results indicated a partially similar pattern in microbial shift during periodontitis progression in both WT and HGF-Tg mice.
Then, we further demonstrated microbial taxa alteration between WT and HGF-Tg mice at different ligation time points. On day 0, phylum_Campilobacterota, genus_Bradyrhizobium, and genus_Helicobacter were more abundant in WT mice, while genus_Alistipes and family_Desulfovibrionaceae displayed a higher proportion in HGF-Tg mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 3A,B). On day 7, we found the abundance of phylum_Actinobacteriota, genus_Klebsiella, genus_Lactobacillus, genus_Escherichia-Shigella, genus_Enterococcus, and genus_Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002 were elevated, and genus_Rodentibacter, genus_Veillonella, genus_Gemella together with genus_Bergeyella exhibited lower prevalence in HGF-Tg mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 3C,E). On day 28, phylum_Campilobacterota, genus_Bergeyella, and genus_Blautia accounted for a higher proportion in HGF-Tg mice, contrasting with the enrichment of genus_Veillonella, genus_Parabacteroides, and genus_Bacteroides in WT mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 3D,F).
Notably, changes in certain flora, including genus_Lactobacillus, showed contrasting trends during the two disease periods of HGF-Tg mice, consistent with the different effects of HGF on periodontitis progression. Moreover, the abundance of the probiotic genus_Bifidobacterium was diminished in the H28 group compared with the C28 group. Concurrently, the proportion of pro-inflammatory genus_Rodentibacter in the C7, C28, and H28 groups was richer than the C0, H0, and H7 groups (Figure 3G).

3.3. Identification of LIP Microbiota Correlated with Inflammation and Bone Metabolism

Typically, IL-6 and TNF-α were positively associated with bone destruction and inflammation of periodontitis; blood CTXI and PINP serve as markers of bone resorption and bone formation, respectively [20,29]. We previously found that HGF significantly decreased the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and CTXI on day 7 but increased these indicators on day 28, and PINP showed no significant difference between WT and HGF-Tg mice [18]. Therefore, we examined the correlation between microbial community structure and these indices of laboratory tests. The Mantel test heatmap demonstrated IL-6 and TNF-α were positively associated with the community distance matrix (Figure 4A). RDA (Figure 4B, Table 1) revealed that IL-6, TNF-α, and CTXI showed a significantly positive correlation with the alterations in the C7, C28, and H28 groups, and a negative correlation with the microbial distribution of the H7 group (p < 0.05). We also employed the Spearman correlation test to investigate the association between these selected biomarkers and microbial taxa at the genus level. Sphingomonas, Clostridium-innocuum-group, Aquabacterium, Enterobacterales, Rhodococcus, Staphylococcus, Bergeyella, Bacillus, Dubosiella, and Gemella were positively associated with IL-6 and TNF-α. Conversely, Bacteroides and Coriobacteriaceae were negatively correlated with IL-6 and TNF-α. Dubosiella, Bergeyella, and Gemella were positively associated with CTXI, and Proteus were positively associated with PINP (Figure 4C).

3.4. HGF Shifted Microbial Function During Periodontitis Progression

To investigate the potential effects of HGF on the microbiota biological pathways of LIP, the abundance of functional categories was predicted using PICRUSt2 analysis. Our prior findings indicated that HGF reduced the expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17 on day 7, but enhanced these indices on day 28 [18]. This led us to hypothesize a connection between these alterations and the microbiota at ligature sites. As shown in Figure 5, the richness of inflammatory pathways, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt), forkhead box O (FoxO), and interleukin-17 (IL-17) signaling pathway, was higher in the H28 group than the C28 group. In addition, HGF also diminished the abundance of the FoxO signaling pathway at the early stage of periodontitis.

4. Discussion

In this study, we examined the ligature microbiota of HGF-Tg mice during the early and late stages of experimental periodontitis. Our findings revealed that HGF significantly altered microbial diversity and composition, which were linked to inflammation and bone metabolism during periodontitis. The changes in certain bacterial taxa and predicted inflammatory pathways showed different trends between the two stages, consistent with the different impact of HGF on periodontitis. These results suggested that the tissue destruction may be associated with a disease-oriented microbial shift affected by HGF.
Our study demonstrated that periodontitis reduced α-diversity in both WT and HGF-Tg mice, and HGF elevated α-diversity in the late stage of periodontitis. Reduced diversity, reflecting a single and unstable microbial community, was identified as a feature associated with the loss of commensals and the accumulation of pathogens [30]. A previous study also verified that the microbial structure was significantly shifted from control to periodontitis at all time points according to β-diversity [31], which was consistent with our result. Notably, the β-diversity exhibited clear spatial segregation between WT and HGF-Tg mice. These results suggested the distribution and composition of ligature microbiota may be partially influenced by HGF.
Further analysis identified specific microorganisms implicated in periodontitis. We observed that Bifidobacterium was less prevalent in the H28 group than in the C28 group. A randomized clinical trial displayed that Bifidobacterium enhanced additional clinical, microbiological, and immunological benefits in the treatment of periodontitis [32]. We also found that Lactobacillus was more or less prevalent in the C7, C28, and H28 groups than in the controls and the H7 group, and Lactobacillus served as a prebiotic beneficial for the treatment of periodontitis [8]. The underlying mechanisms mainly included its anti-inflammatory responses and suppression of periodontal pathogens [33]. Rodentibater, which participated in the development of experimental periodontitis [31], was also significantly more abundant in the C7, C28, and H28 groups but declined in the H7 group. This may be one of the reasons why the H7 group showed less bone damage and inflammation compared with other LIP groups.
It has been widely recognized that inflammation and bone destruction can be influenced by microbiota [34]. Therefore, we performed a correlation analysis to identify a specific genus linked with inflammation and bone metabolism in our study. Among them, the periodontitis-associated genus Rodentibater was positively correlated with TNF-α but inversely associated with PINP, further indicating that Rodentibater may be involved in inflammation and bone metabolism during periodontitis. Moreover, Sphingomonas, another microorganism positively associated with IL-6 and TNF-α in our study, was identified as more abundant in the gut of patients with colitis-associated cancer [35] and in an inflammation-associated animal model [36]. Sphingomonas paucimobilis (a species belonging to Sphingomonas) was the most frequently isolated subgingival non-oral Gram-negative bacterium from periodontitis [9]. We observed IL-6 and TNF-α were also positively related to Clostridium-innocuum-group, which was classified as a risk factor for hypertension, with IL-1R2 (an inflammation-associated receptor) being identified as a significant mediator [37]. The above evidence suggests that Sphingomonas and the Clostridium-innocuum group might participate in the inflammation of periodontitis. On the contrary, Bacteroides might exert an anti-inflammatory effect according to our analysis. Bacteroides is widely known as a dominant butyrate-producing bacterium in the intestine, and butyrate plays an anti-inflammatory role in periodontitis [38]. However, Bacteroides may act as an infecting organism to enhance damage to tissue [39]. Therefore, the precise causal relationship between these taxa and periodontitis is required for more sufficient and rigorous verification.
Our previous study demonstrated that HGF decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17 on day 7 but elevated these indices on day 28 compared with WT mice [18]. Considering oral microbial function involved in inflammation, we utilized PICRUSt2 analysis to depict the different microbial pathways modified by HGF. Intriguingly, MAPK, PI3K-Akt, FoxO, and IL-17 signaling pathways were activated in the H28 group but suppressed in the H7 group. It has been widely recognized that FoxO proteins, which are modulated by the MAPK and PI3K-Akt pathways, play a crucial role in regulating the transcription of IL-6 and TNF-α [40]. G. Calissi et al. also revealed that the FoxO signaling pathway was involved in Th17 differentiation and IL-17 secretion [41]. IL-17 is regarded as an inducer of osteoclast differentiation via upregulating TRAF6 expression and RANKL/OPG ratio, thus enhancing bone loss in periodontitis [42,43]. Interestingly, our prior findings also indicated that HGF exerted divergent regulatory effects on the IL-17/RANKL/OPG axis in different stages of periodontitis [18]. The above evidence demonstrates that HGF may contribute to the inflammatory response and bone metabolism at different stages of periodontitis by affecting microbial functions.
Nevertheless, this study had several limitations. We examined the ligature microbiota, which did not fully capture the complexity of the periodontal microbiota. Although PICRUSt2 provides useful insights into potential microbial functions, it relies on reference genome annotations and does not directly measure gene expression or biological activity. The specific mechanism by which periodontitis is altered by microbes in the presence of HGF remains unclear. Possible explanations include indirect regulation through modulation of host immune responses, epithelial barrier integrity, or inflammatory mediators, which in turn reshape the microbial community. Future studies integrating metatranscriptomics, metabolomics, and host–microbe interaction models will be crucial to elucidate how HGF mechanistically influences the oral microbiome.

5. Conclusions

Overall, our findings revealed stepwise shifts in the ligature-associated microbiome during the development of periodontitis. While microbial dysbiosis was a common feature, the influence of HGF varied according to the disease stage. Specifically, HGF appeared to mitigate dysbiosis in the early stage but exacerbate microbial imbalance in the late stage. These findings not only provide new insight into the complex interactions between host factors and microbial ecology during periodontal disease progression but also suggest that therapeutic strategies targeting HGF–microbiota interactions may need to be stage-tailored to achieve optimal outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: X.W.; methodology: R.J., X.Z. and Z.C.; validation: R.J., X.Z., Z.C., Y.G. and Z.W.; formal analysis: R.J., X.Z. and Z.C.; investigation: R.J., X.Z. and Z.C.; resources: X.W.; data curation: R.J., X.Z. and Z.C.; writing—original draft preparation: R.J., X.Z. and Z.C.; writing—review and editing: X.W.; visualization: Z.C.; supervision: X.W.; project administration: X.W.; funding acquisition: X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81700985), the Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (grant number 2024A03J0138), the Plan on Enhancing Scientific Research in Guangzhou Medical University (grant numbers 02-408-2304-05037XM and 02-408-240603131063), and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Program (grant number 202201020203). The APC was funded by the Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Guangdong Huawei Testing Co., Ltd. (protocol code HWT-BG-117).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw 16S rRNA sequencing data have been submitted to NCBI under the SRA database [PRJNA1088630]. All authors have approved the data in this study for publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HGFHepatocyte Growth Factor
WTWild Type
HGF-TgHepatocyte Growth Factor High-Expression Transgenic
TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor-α
IL-6Interleukin-6
IL-17Interleukin-17
LIPLigature-induced periodontitis
CTXIC-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen
PINPN-terminal pro-peptide of type I procollagen
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
PI3K/AktPhosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B
FoxOForkhead box O
TRAF6TNF receptor-associated factor 6
RANKLReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κ B Ligand
OPGOsteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor
OTUOperational Taxonomic Units
PCoAPrincipal coordinate analysis
LDALinear Discriminant Analysis
LEfSeLinear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size
PICRUStPhylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States
RDARedundancy Analysis

References

  1. Kassebaum, N.J.; Bernabé, E.; Dahiya, M.; Bhandari, B.; Murray, C.J.L.; Marcenes, W. Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990–2010: A systematic review and meta-regression. J. Dent. Res. 2014, 93, 1045–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Curtis, M.A.; Diaz, P.I.; Van Dyke, T.E. The role of the microbiota in periodontal disease. Periodontology 2000 2020, 83, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, W.; Lin, C.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X. HGF Aggravated Periodontitis-Associated Gut Barrier and Microbial Dysfunction: Implications for Oral–Gut Axis Regulation. Biology 2025, 14, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Blasco-Baque, V.; Garidou, L.; Pomié, C.; Escoula, Q.; Loubieres, P.; Le Gall-David, S.; Lemaitre, M.; Nicolas, S.; Klopp, P.; Waget, A.; et al. Periodontitis induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis drives periodontal microbiota dysbiosis and insulin resistance via an impaired adaptive immune response. Gut 2017, 66, 872–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pan, C.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Song, J.; Tan, L.; Zhao, H. Porphyromonas gingivalis can invade periodontal ligament stem cells. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, T.; Shen, S.; Li, Z.; Ma, X.; Gu, X.; Zhang, X.; Peng, A.; Xu, X.; et al. Study of the inflammatory activating process in the early stage of Fusobacterium nucleatum infected PDLSCs. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2023, 15, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hajishengallis, G.; Liang, S.; Payne, M.A.; Hashim, A.; Jotwani, R.; Eskan, M.A.; McIntosh, M.L.; Alsam, A.; Kirkwood, K.L.; Lambris, J.D.; et al. Low-abundance biofilm species orchestrates inflammatory periodontal disease through the commensal microbiota and complement. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 10, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Homayouni Rad, A.; Pourjafar, H.; Mirzakhani, E. A comprehensive review of the application of probiotics and postbiotics in oral health. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1120995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. van Winkelhoff, A.J.; Rurenga, P.; Wekema-Mulder, G.J.; Singadji, Z.M.; Rams, T.E. Non-oral gram-negative facultative rods in chronic periodontitis microbiota. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 94, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ribeiro, A.A.; Jiao, Y.; Girnary, M.; Alves, T.; Chen, L.; Farrell, A.; Wu, D.; Teles, F.; Inohara, N.; Swanson, K.V.; et al. Oral biofilm dysbiosis during experimental periodontitis. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2022, 37, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dutzan, N.; Kajikawa, T.; Abusleme, L.; Greenwell-Wild, T.; Zuazo, C.E.; Ikeuchi, T.; Brenchley, L.; Abe, T.; Hurabielle, C.; Martin, D.; et al. A dysbiotic microbiome triggers TH17 cells to mediate oral mucosal immunopathology in mice and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaat0797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kittaka, M.; Yoshimoto, T.; Schlosser, C.; Kajiya, M.; Kurihara, H.; Reichenberger, E.J.; Ueki, Y. Microbe-Dependent Exacerbated Alveolar Bone Destruction in Heterozygous Cherubism Mice. JBMR Plus 2020, 4, e10352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, C.-T.; Teles, R.; Kantarci, A.; Chen, T.; McCafferty, J.; Starr, J.R.; Brito, L.C.N.; Paster, B.J.; Van Dyke, T.E. Resolvin E1 Reverses Experimental Periodontitis and Dysbiosis. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 2796–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Afacan, B.; Keleş Yücel, Z.P.; Paşali, Ç.; Atmaca İlhan, H.; Köse, T.; Emingil, G. Effect of non-surgical periodontal treatment on gingival crevicular fluid hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels in generalized aggressive periodontitis patients. J. Periodontol. 2020, 91, 1495–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Molnarfi, N.; Benkhoucha, M.; Funakoshi, H.; Nakamura, T.; Lalive, P.H. Hepatocyte growth factor: A regulator of inflammation and autoimmunity. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015, 14, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nagaraja, C.; Pradeep, A.R. Hepatocyte growth factor levels in gingival crevicular fluid in health, disease, and after treatment. J. Periodontol. 2007, 78, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alamri, T.; Alkhaldy, A.A.; Gauthaman, K.; Pushparaj, P.N.; Moulay, M.; Mirza, A.A.; Azhar, E.I.; Barnawi, S.; Papadopoulou, G.; Karamitros, T.; et al. Growth factors in relation to obesity, food habits, and microbiota among healthy Saudis: Preliminary results. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 26, 9311–9326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhao, X.; Liu, W.; Wu, Z.; He, X.; Tang, Y.; He, Q.; Lin, C.; Chen, Y.; Luo, G.; Yu, T.; et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is protective in early stage but bone-destructive in late stage of experimental periodontitis. J. Periodontal Res. 2024, 59, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Yan, L.; Tang, Y.; He, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, W.; Wu, Z.; Luo, G. Anti-inflammatory effect of HGF responses to oral traumatic ulcers using an HGF-Tg mouse model. Exp. Anim. 2022, 71, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Molon, R.S.; Park, C.H.; Jin, Q.; Sugai, J.; Cirelli, J.A. Characterization of ligature-induced experimental periodontitis. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2018, 81, 1412–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, C.; Zhao, D.; Ma, W.; Guo, Y.; Wang, A.; Wang, Q.; Lee, D.-J. Denitrifying sulfide removal process on high-salinity wastewaters in the presence of Halomonas sp. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 1421–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ren, Y.; Yu, G.; Shi, C.; Liu, L.; Guo, Q.; Han, C.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B.; Gao, H.; et al. Majorbio Cloud: A one-stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses. iMeta 2022, 1, e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schloss, P.D.; Westcott, S.L.; Ryabin, T.; Hall, J.R.; Hartmann, M.; Hollister, E.B.; Lesniewski, R.A.; Oakley, B.B.; Parks, D.H.; Robinson, C.J.; et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7537–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Oksanen, J.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; O’hara, B.; Stevens, M.; Oksanen, M.; Suggests, M. The Vegan Package: Community Ecology Package; R Foundation: Vienna, Austria, 2007; Volume 1, pp. 1–190. [Google Scholar]
  27. Douglas, G.M.; Maffei, V.J.; Zaneveld, J.R.; Yurgel, S.N.; Brown, J.R.; Taylor, C.M.; Huttenhower, C.; Langille, M.G.I. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Parks, D.H.; Tyson, G.W.; Hugenholtz, P.; Beiko, R.G. STAMP: Statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 3123–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eastell, R.; Szulc, P. Use of bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017, 5, 908–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Petersen, C.; Round, J.L. Defining dysbiosis and its influence on host immunity and disease. Cell. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arce, M.; Endo, N.; Dutzan, N.; Abusleme, L. A reappraisal of microbiome dysbiosis during experimental periodontitis. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2022, 37, 180–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Invernici, M.M.; Salvador, S.L.; Silva, P.H.F.; Soares, M.S.M.; Casarin, R.; Palioto, D.B.; Souza, S.L.S.; Taba, M.; Novaes, A.B.; Furlaneto, F.A.C.; et al. Effects of Bifidobacterium probiotic on the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45, 1198–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. İnce, G.; Gürsoy, H.; İpçi, Ş.D.; Cakar, G.; Emekli-Alturfan, E.; Yılmaz, S. Clinical and Biochemical Evaluation of Lozenges Containing Lactobacillus reuteri as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Chronic Periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2015, 86, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ebersole, J.; Kirakodu, S.; Chen, J.; Nagarajan, R.; Gonzalez, O.A. Oral Microbiome and Gingival Transcriptome Profiles of Ligature-Induced Periodontitis. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 746–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Richard, M.L.; Liguori, G.; Lamas, B.; Brandi, G.; da Costa, G.; Hoffmann, T.W.; Pierluigi Di Simone, M.; Calabrese, C.; Poggioli, G.; Langella, P.; et al. Mucosa-associated microbiota dysbiosis in colitis associated cancer. Gut Microbes 2018, 9, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gao, W.-T.; Liu, J.-X.; Wang, D.-H.; Sun, H.-J.; Zhang, X.-Y. Melatonin reduced colon inflammation but had no effect on energy metabolism in ageing Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 273, 109731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhao, S.; Zhang, J.; Ding, F.; Sun, S. Relationships among gut microbes, the interleukin family, and hypertension: A mediation Mendelian randomization study. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1293170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wu, L.; Luo, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yan, Z.; Fu, J.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y. Butyrate Inhibits Dendritic Cell Activation and Alleviates Periodontitis. J. Dent. Res. 2023, 102, 1326–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wexler, H.M. Bacteroides: The good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 593–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, M.E.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, J.S. FoxO Transcription Factors: Applicability as a Novel Immune Cell Regulators and Therapeutic Targets in Oxidative Stress-Related Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hedrick, S.M.; Hess Michelini, R.; Doedens, A.L.; Goldrath, A.W.; Stone, E.L. FOXO transcription factors throughout T cell biology. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xiao, E.; Mattos, M.; Vieira, G.H.A.; Chen, S.; Corrêa, J.D.; Wu, Y.; Albiero, M.L.; Bittinger, K.; Graves, D.T. Diabetes Enhances IL-17 Expression and Alters the Oral Microbiome to Increase Its Pathogenicity. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 120–128.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, Z.; Weng, J.; Du, X.; Ji, R.; Yang, X.; Yang, Y.; Ma, M. Quaternized chitosan/glycyrrhizic acid co-decorated titanium with enhanced antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and osteogenic properties for dental implant applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 367, 123984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Assessment of ligature microbiota α-diversity among WT mice (control, C) on day 0 (C0), day 7 (C7), and day 28 (C28) together with HGF-Tg mice (H) on day 0 (H0), day 7 (H7), and day 28 (H28). (BE) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots illustrating the genus-level distribution, utilizing Bray–Curtis distance metrics. (F) Cluster analysis of all samples across six groups. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 1. (A) Assessment of ligature microbiota α-diversity among WT mice (control, C) on day 0 (C0), day 7 (C7), and day 28 (C28) together with HGF-Tg mice (H) on day 0 (H0), day 7 (H7), and day 28 (H28). (BE) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots illustrating the genus-level distribution, utilizing Bray–Curtis distance metrics. (F) Cluster analysis of all samples across six groups. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Biology 14 01393 g001
Figure 2. The relative abundance of microbiota in ligature sites at the phylum level (A) and genus level (B). (C,D) LEfSe analysis identified taxa with differential abundance, characterized by an LDA score exceeding 3.0 and a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Figure 2. The relative abundance of microbiota in ligature sites at the phylum level (A) and genus level (B). (C,D) LEfSe analysis identified taxa with differential abundance, characterized by an LDA score exceeding 3.0 and a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Biology 14 01393 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of proportions between the C0 and H0 groups at the phylum level (A) and genus level (B). Difference in microbial abundance between the C7 and H7 groups at the phylum level (C) and genus level (E). The differential taxa were identified between the C28 and H28 groups at the phylum level (D) and genus level (F). (G) The proportions of g_Lactobacillus, g_Bifidobacterium, and g_Rodentibacter among 6 groups. *, p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Comparison of proportions between the C0 and H0 groups at the phylum level (A) and genus level (B). Difference in microbial abundance between the C7 and H7 groups at the phylum level (C) and genus level (E). The differential taxa were identified between the C28 and H28 groups at the phylum level (D) and genus level (F). (G) The proportions of g_Lactobacillus, g_Bifidobacterium, and g_Rodentibacter among 6 groups. *, p < 0.05.
Biology 14 01393 g003
Figure 4. (A) A network heatmap generated from the Mantel test, showcasing the overarching relationships between the microbiota composition and inflammatory as well as bone metabolic markers. (B) RDA of microbial diversity and environmental indices. (C) Spearman correlation between genus and environmental indices was illustrated by a heatmap. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 4. (A) A network heatmap generated from the Mantel test, showcasing the overarching relationships between the microbiota composition and inflammatory as well as bone metabolic markers. (B) RDA of microbial diversity and environmental indices. (C) Spearman correlation between genus and environmental indices was illustrated by a heatmap. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Biology 14 01393 g004
Figure 5. Comparative analysis of 4 pro-inflammatory PICRUSt-predicted pathways, including MAPK (A), PI3K-Akt (B), FoxO (C), and IL-17 (D) signaling pathways, was shown using violin plots. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Comparative analysis of 4 pro-inflammatory PICRUSt-predicted pathways, including MAPK (A), PI3K-Akt (B), FoxO (C), and IL-17 (D) signaling pathways, was shown using violin plots. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Biology 14 01393 g005
Table 1. The RDA between oral microbiota and selected indicators.
Table 1. The RDA between oral microbiota and selected indicators.
RDA1 RDA2 R2 p Value
TNF-α−0.9987−0.05150.42890.034
IL-6−0.99920.04040.36570.045
CTXI−0.82090.5710.46130.013
PINP0.7857−0.61860.27930.104
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ji, R.; Zhao, X.; Chen, Z.; Ge, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, X. Hepatocyte Growth Factor Differentially Modulates Oral Microbiota in Early vs. Late Experimental Periodontitis. Biology 2025, 14, 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14101393

AMA Style

Ji R, Zhao X, Chen Z, Ge Y, Wu Z, Wang X. Hepatocyte Growth Factor Differentially Modulates Oral Microbiota in Early vs. Late Experimental Periodontitis. Biology. 2025; 14(10):1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14101393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ji, Ruotong, Xiaomin Zhao, Zhen Chen, Yifei Ge, Zhicong Wu, and Xinhong Wang. 2025. "Hepatocyte Growth Factor Differentially Modulates Oral Microbiota in Early vs. Late Experimental Periodontitis" Biology 14, no. 10: 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14101393

APA Style

Ji, R., Zhao, X., Chen, Z., Ge, Y., Wu, Z., & Wang, X. (2025). Hepatocyte Growth Factor Differentially Modulates Oral Microbiota in Early vs. Late Experimental Periodontitis. Biology, 14(10), 1393. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14101393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop