Next Article in Journal
Protective Effect of Polysaccharides Isolated from Sargassum horneri against H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress Both In Vitro, in Vero Cells, and In Vivo in Zebrafish
Previous Article in Journal
The Fluorinated NAD Precursors Enhance FK866 Cytotoxicity by Activating SARM1 in Glioblastoma Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploration of Protease Resources in the Gut of Omnivorous Gryllotalpa orientalis (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae)

1
Laboratory of Enzyme Preparation, Hebei Research Institute of Microbiology Co., Ltd., Baoding 071051, China
2
College of Life Science, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
3
Institute of Biology, Hebei Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050052, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(9), 650; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090650
Submission received: 7 July 2024 / Revised: 19 August 2024 / Accepted: 22 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Microbiology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The digestive enzymes present in the insect gut play a crucial role in digesting food and extracting essential nutrients. The diverse range of digestive enzymes found in the insect gut serves as a valuable source of functional proteins. With a significant population of herbivorous insects, there has been extensive research on cellulase in the insect gut. This study utilized both culture-independent and culture-dependent methods to investigate the protease resources responsible for digesting animal and plant proteins, laying a solid foundation for future research and utilization of proteases derived from insect sources.

Abstract

An insect’s gut microbiome is an essential “organ” in their life cycle, playing a crucial role by aiding food digestion and nutrient absorption. This study employed both culture-independent and culture-dependent methods to explore the protease resources present in the gut of the omnivorous insect Gryllotalpa orientalis. The findings revealed that the gut extract of G. orientalis contained a diverse array of proteases, including cysteine proteases, pepsin, serine proteases, and trypsin, as well as some unidentified proteases. Furthermore, the protease gene htpX, derived from gut bacterium Priestia megaterium DX-3, has been cloned and recombinantly expressed. The recombinant DX-3-htpX protease exhibited a 61.9-fold increase in fermentation level compared to the DX-3 protease. This protease was characterized as a neutral, heat-resistant metalloprotease with an M48 peptidase domain, and it was observed that the binding of Ca2+ to the recombinant protease resulted in the formation of the largest active pocket. This study provides technical support for further development and utilization of functional protein resources in insect gut.

1. Introduction

The gut of insects is rich in microbial resources, and this diverse gut environment is home to highly diverse species and biological functions, making it a valuable resource for discovering new genes and active substances [1]. The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in helping insect hosts digest food and absorb nutrients [2], even improving the digestive ability of insects to quickly adapt to environmental changes in the face of food scarcity [3]. Nutrient supply is attained through the secretion of various necessary hydrolytic enzymes [4], such as lignocellulase [5], xylanase, protease [6], amylase, lipase [7], and pectinase, et al., for nutrient decomposition, digestion, and absorption.
Various enzyme-producing microorganisms have been screened and identified based on studying the gut of insects [8]. Due to the high proportion of insect species that feed on plant materials, screening enzyme-producing microorganisms in the gut mainly requires the study of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes [9]. Relevant research has been carried out on various insects, such as Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, and Isopteran. However, the gut of insects also possesses various proteases with superior catalytic performance and stable chemical properties, such as trypsin, chymotrypsin, elastase, cathepsin, aminopeptidase, carboxypeptidase, and serine protease [10], which play an essential role in the degradation and immunity of animal and plant proteins. Although microbial culture technology is the most direct means of screening functional microorganisms from nature, exploring novel microbial enzyme resources by using non-cultivation techniques is becoming increasingly popular due to the currently non-cultivable characteristics of most microorganisms. For a considerable number of unknown digestive enzymes in the insect gut, the gene sequence, classification, molecular weight, and functional information of the enzymes can be clarified through enzyme inhibitors [11], zymography [12], chromatography [13], mass spectrometry [11], proteomics [14], and metagenomics [15]. Microbial proteases can be used for the clean production of leather, for enhancing food flavors, as washing aids, and in silk degumming processes [16]. Therefore, proteases derived from insects’ guts have excellent potential for application.
This study utilized culture-independent and recombinant protein expression technology to explore protease resources from the gut of the omnivorous Gryllotalpa orientalis in Gryllotalpidae. This study provides a foundation for the application and development of insect gut resources for addressing issues in agriculture, industry, and environmental protection [17].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Analysis of Proteases Derived from Gut Extract

The G. orientalis were dissected under sterile conditions to obtain a solution of gut contents. After centrifugation at 6000 r/min at 4 °C for 30 min, the supernatant was collected for subsequent analysis of the gut proteins. The protein concentration of the gut extract was determined using a BCA protein concentration determination method. The protease activity of the gut extract was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method [18].
Zymography analysis [16,19]: Zymogram gel electrophoresis was conducted by applying gelatin with a final concentration of 0.1% to the separation gel, though β-mercaptoethanol was not used. We mixed each protein sample with denatured non-reducing loading buffer in a 4:1 ratio and left the mixture at room temperature for 5–10 min without boiling. After sample loading, electrophoresis was carried out at 150 V under ice-bath conditions. Then, the protein gel was first slowly shaken in 50 mL distilled water for 5 min and transferred to a pH 7.6 renaturation buffer containing 2.5% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCl, and 5 mM CaCl2, before being slowly shaken for 30 min. Then, it was transferred to a pH 7.5 incubation buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, and 0.02% NaN3 overnight and slowly shaken at 37 °C. Afterwards, protein gel staining and decolorization analysis were performed.
Protease inhibitor analysis [11,20]: We prepared 100 mM PMSF (phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, a serine protease inhibitor) solution, 30 mM TPCK (N-p-Tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone, a chymotrypsin inhibitor) solution, 10 mM IAA (indoleacetic acid, a cysteine protease inhibitor) solution, 1 mM E-64 (N-(trans-epoxysuccinyl)-L-leucine 4-guanidinobutylamide, a cysteine protease inhibitor) solution, 0.1 mM EGTA (ethylene glycol-bis (2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid, a metalloprotease inhibitor) solution, 1 mM pepsin inhibitor (an aspartate protease inhibitor) solution, and 0.2 mg/mL trypsin protease inhibitor solution. Eight portions of 100 μL prepared insect gut protein samples were taken and mixed with the protease inhibitor at the specified concentration in a ratio of 1:100. Additionally, 1 μL of sterile distilled water was added to one portion as a control. Then, zymography gel electrophoresis was conducted to observe the inhibition of gut protease activity and preliminarily infer the protease information.
LC-MS/MS (Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry) analysis [21,22]: We performed gel-cutting mass spectrometry on the target protease bands in protein gels. Then, enzymatic hydrolysis, liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry analysis of the target protein gels were performed at Beijing Protein Innovation Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The steps were as follows: We washed the protein gel twice with ddH2O and added 1 mL of digestion solution containing 50% acetonitrile and 25 mM NH4HCO3, cleaning twice more. We added acetonitrile to dehydrate and whiten the protein gel. The gel was incubated in the presence of 10 mM DTT at 56 °C for 1 h, placed in a dark room with 55 mM IAM for 45 min, washed twice with 25 mM NH4HCO3, and then rinsed twice with decolorization solution. We added acetonitrile to completely whiten the protein gel and added an enzyme storage solution with NH4HCO3 to a water bath at 37 °C, where it was kept overnight. Finally, 0.1% FA at the final concentration was added to terminate the reaction. The peptide segment was separated using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography system and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. The mass spectrometry database we used was Uniprot 20160315 (https://www.uniprot.org/, accessed on 9 February 2023), and the data were retrieved and analyzed using Mascot Server 2.3.0 (https://www.matrixscience.com, accessed on 10 February 2023).

2.2. Analysis of Proteases Derived from Gut Bacteria

Fermentation was conducted on Priestia megaterium (DX-3), a strain derived from the insect gut with protease activity, focusing on analyzing the properties of the proteases in a fermentation medium containing 3% maltose and 3% skimmed milk powder. We collected fermentation supernatants for 20, 28, 36, and 44 h and analyzed the optimal temperature and pH, as well as the tolerance of the DX-3 protease to the temperature and pH. Meanwhile, the fermentation supernatant was collected for SDS-PAGE electrophoresis analysis.
The protease gene htpX was obtained from the whole genome sequencing of strain DX-3. Primers containing recognition sites for the restriction endonucleases BamH I and Sma I were designed based on the gene sequence of htpX, including P1:5′-CGGATC CTG CTGCTAAAACATTCACTGTT-3′ and P2:5′-TCCCCGGGTTTATAGGAATGCAAGCGC-3′. The genomic DNA of strain DX-3 was as a template, and the protease gene htpX was amplified by PCR. After recovering the PCR amplification product, the vector pHT43 was treated with T4 ligase overnight, digested with BamH I and Sma I at 16 °C, and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α, before being validated through bacterial PCR and sequencing. The recombinant plasmid pHT43-htpX was further transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) to improve transformation efficiency. After successful transformation, it was electro-transformed into Bacillus subtilis WB800N and coated on LB plates containing Cm resistance to screen positive transformants. We inoculated the engineering strain WB800N/pHT43-htpX in LB medium with Cm at a final concentration of 10 μg/mL cultured it to OD600 ≈ 0.6–0.8 and added IPTG with a final concentration of 1 mM to induce recombinant protein expression. In contrast, no IPTG was added to the control. After centrifugation, the fermentation supernatant was obtained and subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis analysis, and enzymatic properties analysis of the recombinant protease DX-3-htpX was also carried out.
Tertiary structure prediction and D3 pocket analysis of the DX-3-htpX protease: The conserved domain was analyzed using the InterPro server (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/, accessed on 10 November 2023) [23]. The tertiary structure was predicted by AlphaFold3 [24]. The D3 pocket and its binding to metal ions were analyzed using CASTpFold (http://sts.bioe.uic.edu/castp/index.html, accessed on 20 May 2024) [25]. The selection of binding pockets was based on prominent concave protein regions frequently associated with binding events, utilizing the alpha shape and the pocket algorithm developed in computational geometry. Subsequently, PyMOL was used to display the tertiary structure of the DX-3-htpX protease.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the results are reported as the mean value ± SD. Line graphs were generated using Origin 2021.

3. Results

3.1. Exploration of Protease Resources from the Gut Extract

The protein content and protease activity of the gut protein samples were determined to be 39.43 ± 0.84 mg/g and 608.19 ± 11.11 U/g. These results indicated that the protease resources in the gut extract of G. orientalis could be effectively utilized for further exploitation and research purposes.
After low-temperature electrophoresis and substrate co-bath treatment, the protease in the gut extract of G. orientalis hydrolyzed the gelatin substrate in the gel. The light-colored area of the gel indicated that a protein hydrolysis reaction had occurred (Figure 1 and Figure S1). The most highly active protein had a molecular weight of approximately 45 kDa, and proteins with relatively high protease activity had molecular weight values of 28, 35, 60, 66, and 200 kDa. The zymogram gel electrophoresis results derived from mixing different protease inhibitors with gut extract samples showed that TPCK, EGTA, and IAA protease inhibitors had no inhibitory effect on the gut protease of G. orientalis. E-64, PMSF, pepsin inhibitors, and trypsin inhibitors had varying degrees of inhibitory effects on the gut proteases. E-64 exerted an inhibitory effect on the LGDBM-4 protease but had an activation effect on the LGDBM-5 protease. PMSF exerted and inhibitory effect on the LGDBM-2 and LGDBM-4 proteases and a slight inhibitory effect on the LGDBM-1 protease. Pepsin inhibitors had an inhibitory effect on the LGDBM-4 protease and a slight inhibitory effect on the LGDBM-1 protease. Trypsin inhibitors exerted an inhibitory effect on the LGDBM-4 protease, a slight inhibitory effect on the LGDBM-1 and LGDBM-3 proteases, and an activation effect on LGDBM-2 protease.
Overall, the LGDBM-1 protease was affected by pepsin inhibitors, PMSF, and trypsin inhibitors, suggesting that its components contain pepsin, serine protease, and trypsin. The LGDBM-2 protease was affected by PMSF, suggesting that its components contain serine protease. The LGDBM-3 protease was affected by trypsin inhibitors, suggesting that its components contain trypsin. The LGDBM-4 protease was affected by E-64, pepsin inhibitors, PMSF, and trypsin inhibitors, suggesting that its components contain cysteine protease, pepsin, serine protease, and trypsin. Various protease inhibitors did not inhibit the LGDBM-5 and LGDBM-6 proteases mentioned above, and E-64 activated the LGDBM-5 protease; their composition needs further analysis and identification (Table 1).
Mass spectrometry analysis of protein bands with protease activity in the zymogram gel showed that LGDBM-1, LGDBM-2, LGDBM-3, LGDBM-4, LGDBM-5, and LGDBM-6 were identified as having 101, 29, 60, 59, 52, and 58 proteins, and they contained 19, 8, 12, 18, 14, and 19 protein modification sites, respectively. Based on the Uniprot database, protein information related to the protease activity exhibited by each protein is shown in Table 2. Except for the LGDBM-2 protease, all other protein samples showed protease-related information upon mass spectrometry identification. The glutathione S-transferase (Uniprot ID: P08515) acted on glutathione and dermcidin (Uniprot ID: P81605), mainly hydrolyzed arginine, and was detected in all protein samples. Meanwhile, specific types of proteases were also found, such as proteasome subunit alpha type-6 (Uniprot ID: P28072) in LGDBM-1, which is a component of the core proteasome complex and participates in the proteolytic degradation of most intracellular proteins. The ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease (Uniprot ID: Q8W585) in LGDBM-3 is a part of the ATP-dependent zinc metalloproteinase complex. Gamma-glutamyl cyclotransferase (Uniprot ID: Q32LE4) in LGDBM-3 catalyzed the formation of 5-oxo proline from gamma-glutamyl dipeptides and may play an essential role in glutathione homeostasis. Cathepsin D (Uniprot ID: Q4LAL9) in LGDBM-4 belongs to the peptidase family A1 and functions similarly to pepsin A [26]. The proteases detected in LGDBM-5 and LGDBM-6 can also be found in the other protein samples, and no unique protease information was detected.

3.2. Exploration of Protease from Gut Bacteria

The strain Priestia megaterium DX-3, among those with protease activity extracted from the gut of G. orientalis, was fermented, and the supernatant was collected for electrophoresis analysis. The results showed that the 42 kDa protein band, i.e., the protein concentration increased by prolonging fermentation time (Figure 2A and Figure S2A), consistent with the dynamic trend in detected fermentation enzyme activity. The optimal reaction temperature of the DX-3 protease was 45 °C, which doubled the enzyme activity compared to 30 °C. The enzyme activity was lower at 60 °C and was greatly affected by temperatures above 60 °C. The DX-3 protease has a strong temperature tolerance, and the enzyme activity preservation rate was still over 90% at 50 °C for 8 h. However, it severely decreased at 60 °C for 8 h (Figure 2B). The optimal pH of the DX-3 protease was pH 7, and the enzyme activity was higher within the pH 7–9 range after storage in pH 6 buffer for 8 h. The enzyme activity preservation rate was the highest after storage in a pH 6 buffer for 8 h. However, the inactivation was more severe upon storage under acidic and alkaline conditions (Figure 2C). The DX-3 protease was neutral and heat-resistant.
The protease gene from strain DX-3 was recombined and expressed to explore the protease derived from gut bacteria. The primer was designed according to the protease gene htpX based on the whole genome sequencing of strain DX-3. We connected the htpX gene to the plasmid pHT43, then transformed it into Bacillus subtilis WB800N and constructed an engineered strain WB800N/pHT43-htpX. The recombinant strain was subjected to IPTG-induced fermentation in an LB medium and compared with the fermentation supernatant without IPTG induction for protein electrophoresis (Figure 2D and Figure S2B). The 42 kDa protein band was only expressed in the IPTG-induced process, indicating that the protease gene htpX was successfully expressed, and it was named DX-3-htpX protease.
After fermentation in LB medium, the DX-3-htpX protease exhibited a high fermentation activity of 135.68 ± 3.66 U/mL. In contrast, the fermentation activity of the DX-3 protease was relatively low, being about 2.19 ± 0.28 U/mL. The optimal reaction temperature for recombinant enzymes was still 45 °C, the enzyme activity increased by 250% from 30 °C to 45 °C (Figure 2E), and the optimal reaction pH was still 7. However, compared with the DX-3 protease, the high temperature resistance and the pH tolerance were improved (Figure 2F).

3.3. Homology Modeling and Binding Pocket Analysis of the DX-3-htpX Protease

The entire length of the protease gene htpX coding sequence was 909 bp. It encoded a protein of 290 amino acid residues with no signal peptide. InterPro analysis of the htpX gene revealed that it contained 203 amino acid peptidase M48 domains (87–289) and metalloprotease (zincin) catalytic domains. The 3D structure of the DX-3-htpX protease was predicted using alphafold3, and the first-ranked model was selected as the research object according to the score ranking. PYMOL was used to display the three-dimensional junction of the DX-3-htpX protease (Figure 3A,B). The model of the DX-3-htpX protease consisted of ten α-helixes, four strands, two 310 helixes, twelve turns, seven bends, and multiple coil regions. The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease and its binding to different ions was predicted using CASTpFold (Figure 3C–F, Table 3), whereby it was shown that Ca2+, Zn2+, Cl, and K+ binding to the DX-3-htpX protease could change the 3D structure and active sites of the DX-3-htpX protease. Ca2+, Zn2+, Cl, and K+, in combination with the DX-3-htpX protease, could help to obtain a larger active pocket, among them, the binding of Ca2+ to the DX-3-htpX protease helped to obtain the largest active pocket.

4. Discussion

The primary method for exploring microbial enzymes is screening cultivable microorganisms [27]. Enzymes can be obtained after fermentation using screening culture media to enrich and isolate target microorganisms [28]. However, the above method has limitations with regard to studying unknown enzyme resources in non-cultivable microorganisms and complex samples. The insect gut is a complex ecosystem containing microorganisms, enzymes, and metabolites, and exploring gut microbial enzyme resources requires a series of non-cultivation techniques. The enzymes with proteolytic activity in mixed-protein samples from the gut of G. orientalis could be identified based on gelatin zymography [12]. Moreover, conventional protease inhibitors did not affect LGDBM-5 and LGDBM-6, indicating that these two protein samples may contain unannotated protease types. Although some information on gut proteases was obtained with the use of gelatin zymography and mass spectrometry technology, due to the sample size requirements of protein mass spectrometry technology, from the mass spectrometry process, some protease information relating to the low-concentration protein content in the insect gut may be missing [29], and further research is needed to develop a method for exploring gut enzyme resources that combines gelatin zymography and mass spectrometry.
Alternatively, we could mine enzyme genes based on genome sequencing and predict their catalytic mechanisms and functions [30]. Functional genes from microorganisms could also be cloned, and efficient biomass conversion systems could be used to prepare recombinant proteins [31]. In this study, protease genes derived from gut microbiota were recombined and expressed. The binding conformation of recombinant protease molecules with metal ions was simulated and compared, providing a data-anchored basis for optimizing the molecular conformation of recombinant protease to improve enzyme catalytic efficiency and facilitate the development and utilization of protease resources derived from the insect gut [8].

5. Conclusions

The protease resources derived from G. orientalis gut extract include cysteine proteases, pepsin, serine proteases, and trypsin, and G. orientalis gut extract may contain unrecognized proteases. Furthermore, the protease gene htpX derived from the gut bacteria DX-3 was cloned and recombinantly expressed. The DX-3-htpX protease was neutral, heat-resistant, and exhibited a metalloproteinase containing an M48 peptidase domain. The binding of Ca2+ to the DX-3-htpX protease could help to obtain the largest active pocket.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13090650/s1, Figure S1: The zymography analysis of the gut protein sample of G. orientalis. Figure S2: SDS-PAGE analysis of the DX-3 protease (A) and DX-3-htpX protease (B).

Author Contributions

X.Z.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Visualization, Writing—Original Draft, and Funding acquisition. F.W.: Methodology, Validation, and Writing—Original Draft. L.Z.: Methodology, Data Curation, and Formal analysis. H.Z.: Software and Visualization. Z.Z.: Resources and Supervision. Z.J.: Supervision and Writing—Review and Editing. F.S.: Supervision, Project administration, and Writing—Review and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Project of Hebei Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2022Q2). The authors declare that this study received funding from Hebei Academy of Sciences. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Xiang Zheng, Fangtong Wu, Lu Zhao, He Zhou, and Zhenhua Jia were employed by the company Hebei Research Institute of Microbiology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Douglas, A.E. The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology. Funct. Ecol. 2009, 23, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Engel, P.; Moran, N.A. The gut microbiota of insects-diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 699–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iyeh, C.I.; Ademolu, K.O.; Osipitan, A.A.; Idowu, A.B. Circadian Variations in the Digestive Enzyme Activities of Gut Homogenates of Adult American Cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Afr. Entomol. 2021, 29, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Perera, O.P.; Shelby, K.S.; Pierce, C.A.; Snodgrass, G.L. Expression Profiles of Digestive Genes in the Gut and Salivary Glands of Tarnished Plant Bug (Hemiptera: Miridae). J. Insect Sci. 2021, 21, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shelomi, M.; Wipfler, B.; Zhou, X.; Pauchet, Y. Multifunctional cellulase enzymes are ancestral in Polyneoptera. Insect Mol. Biol. 2020, 29, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Grover, S.; Kaur, S.; Gupta, A.K.; Taggar, G.K.; Kaur, J. Characterization of Trypsin Like Protease from Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) and Its Potential Inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India B 2016, 88, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. MsangoSoko, K.; Gandotra, S.; Bhattacharya, R.; Ramakrishnan, B.; Sharma, K.; Subramanian, S. Screening and characterization of lipase producing bacteria isolated from the gut of a lepidopteran larvae, Samia ricini. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2022, 25, 101856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kannan, M.; Mubarakali, D.; Thiyonila, B.; Krishnan, M.; Padmanaban, B.; Shantkriti, S. Insect gut as a bioresource for potential enzymes-an unexploited area for industrial biotechnology. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 18, 101010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hori, C.; Song, R.; Matsumoto, K.; Matsumoto, R.; Minkoff, B.B.; Oita, S.; Hara, H.; Takasuka, T.E. Proteomic Characterization of Lignocellulolytic Enzymes Secreted by the Insect-Associated Fungus Daldinia decipiens oita, Isolated from a Forest in Northern Japan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e02350-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sanatan, P.T.; Lomate, P.R.; Giri, A.P.; Hivrale, V.K. Characterization of a chemostable serine alkaline protease from Periplaneta americana. BMC Biochem. 2013, 14, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Geib, S.M.; Tien, M.; Hoover, K. Identification of proteins involved in lignocellulose degradation using in gel zymogram analysis combined with mass spectroscopy-based peptide analysis of gut proteins from larval Asian longhorned beetles, Anoplophora glabripennis. Insect Sci. 2010, 17, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Javaheri-Kermani, M.; Asoodeh, A. A novel beta-1,4 glucanase produced by symbiotic Bacillus sp. CF96 isolated from termite (Anacanthotermes). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hatefi, A.; Makhdoumi, A.; Asoodeh, A.; Mirshamsi, O. Characterization of a bi-functional cellulase produced by a gut bacterial resident of Rosaceae branch borer beetle, Osphranteria coerulescens (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 103, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vilcinskas, A.; Schwabe, M.; Brinkrolf, K.; Plarre, R.; Wielsch, N.; Vogel, H. Larvae of the Clothing Moth Tineola bisselliella Maintain Gut Bacteria that Secrete Enzyme Cocktails to Facilitate the Digestion of Keratin. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sun, J.; Li, P.; Liu, Z.; Huang, W.; Mao, X. A novel thermostable serine protease from a metagenomic library derived from marine sediments in the East China Sea. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 9229–9238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kannan, M.; Ramya, T.; Anbalagan, S.; Suriya, J.; Krishnan, M. Proteomic analysis of pupal gut serine protease of Silkworm, Bombyx mori: Partial purification and biochemical characterization. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 12, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Banerjee, S.; Maiti, T.K.; Roy, R.N. Enzyme producing insect gut microbes: An unexplored biotechnological aspect. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 42, 384–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chauhan, J.V.; Mathukiya, R.P.; Singh, S.P.; Gohel, S.D. Two steps purification, biochemical characterization, thermodynamics and structure elucidation of thermostable alkaline serine protease from Nocardiopsis alba strain OM-5. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wilkesman, J. Cysteine Protease Zymography: Brief Review. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1626, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  20. Budatha, M.; Meur, G.; Dutta-Gupta, A. Identification and characterization of midgut proteases in Achaea janata and their implications. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 30, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ralhan, R.; Masui, O.; DeSouza, L.V.; Matta, A.; Macha, M.; Siu, K.W.M. Identification of proteins secreted by head and neck cancer cell lines using LC-MS/MS: Strategy for discovery of candidate serological biomarkers. Proteomics 2011, 11, 2363–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, Q.; Zhang, T.; Song, N.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lu, X.; Fang, J.; Chen, J. Purification and characterization of four key enzymes from a feather-degrading Bacillus subtilis from the gut of tarantula Chilobrachys guangxiensis. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 96, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Blum, M.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Pinto, B.L.; Salazar, G.A.; Bileschi, M.L.; Bork, P.; Bridge, A.; Colwell, L.; et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D418–D427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abramson, J.; Adler, J.; Dunger, J.; Evans, R.; Green, T.; Pritzel, A.; Ronneberger, O.; Willmore, L.; Ballard, A.J.; Bambrick, J.; et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 2024, 630, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ye, B.; Tian, W.; Wang, B.; Liang, J. CASTpFold: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of the universe of protein Folds. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W194–W199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ren, H.N.; Zhuo, T.X.; Bai, S.J.; Bai, Y.; Sun, X.Y.; Dan Liu, R.; Long, S.R.; Cui, J.; Wang, Z.Q. Proteomic analysis of hydrolytic proteases in excretory/secretory proteinsff from Trichinella spiralis intestinal infective larvae using zymography combined with shotgun LC-MS/MS approach. Acta Trop. 2021, 216, 105825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Thanh Ha, D.T.; Kim Thoa, L.T.; Phuong Thao, T.T.; Dung, T.T.; Minh Ha, T.T.; Phuong Lan, T.T.; Khoo, K.S.; Show, P.L.; Huy, N.D. Production of extracellular agarase from Priestia megaterium AT7 and evaluation on marine algae hydrolysis. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2024, 172, 110339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Adlakha, N.; Rajagopal, R.; Kumar, S.; Reddy, V.S.; Yazdani, S.S. Synthesis and characterization of chimeric proteins based on cellulase and xylanase from an insect gut bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 4859–4866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Petkauskaite, R.; Lukosius, D.; Dębski, J.; Jasilionis, A.; Dadlez, M.; Kieraite, I.; Timonina, A.; Kuisiene, N. Identification of proteins involved in starch and polygalacturonic acid degradation using LC/MS. Open Life Sci. 2014, 9, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Robinson, S.L.; Piel, J.; Sunagawa, S. A roadmap for metagenomic enzyme discovery. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 1994–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Munjal, N.; Jawed, K.; Wajid, S.; Yazdani, S.S. A constitutive expression system for cellulase secretion in Escherichia coli and its use in bioethanol production. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The zymography analysis of the gut protein sample of G. orientalis. (a) Collagenase. (b) Gut protein samples. (c) Gut extract with TPCK. (d) Gut extract with E-64. (e) Gut extract with Pepsin inhibitor. (f) Gut extract with EGTA. (g) Gut extract with IAA. (h) Gut extract with PMSF. (i) Gut extract with Trypsin inhibitor.
Figure 1. The zymography analysis of the gut protein sample of G. orientalis. (a) Collagenase. (b) Gut protein samples. (c) Gut extract with TPCK. (d) Gut extract with E-64. (e) Gut extract with Pepsin inhibitor. (f) Gut extract with EGTA. (g) Gut extract with IAA. (h) Gut extract with PMSF. (i) Gut extract with Trypsin inhibitor.
Biology 13 00650 g001
Figure 2. Enzymatic properties of proteases from gut bacteria. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the DX-3 proteases with different fermentation durations. Lanes 1–4 were fermented for 44, 36, 28, and 20 h, respectively. (B) Optimal temperature and temperature tolerance of the DX-3 protease. (C) Optimal pH and pH tolerance of the DX-3 protease. (D) Recombinant expression of recombinant plasmid pHT43-htpX in WB800N; 1: IPTG induction for 44 h; 2: without IPTG induction, 44 h. (E) Optimal temperature of the DX-3-htpX protease. (F) Optimal pH of the DX-3-htpX protease. The values represented the average of three independent experiments.
Figure 2. Enzymatic properties of proteases from gut bacteria. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of the DX-3 proteases with different fermentation durations. Lanes 1–4 were fermented for 44, 36, 28, and 20 h, respectively. (B) Optimal temperature and temperature tolerance of the DX-3 protease. (C) Optimal pH and pH tolerance of the DX-3 protease. (D) Recombinant expression of recombinant plasmid pHT43-htpX in WB800N; 1: IPTG induction for 44 h; 2: without IPTG induction, 44 h. (E) Optimal temperature of the DX-3-htpX protease. (F) Optimal pH of the DX-3-htpX protease. The values represented the average of three independent experiments.
Biology 13 00650 g002
Figure 3. The three-dimensional structure and D3 pocket of the DX-3-htpX protease and its binding to different ions are shown by PyMOL. (A) The three-dimensional structure of the DX-3-htpX protease is shown as a cartoon and colored with a rainbow spectrum (N-terminal was purple, C-terminal was red). (B) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease. (C) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease binding to Ca2+. (D) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease binding to Zn2+. (E) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease binding to Cl. (F) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease binding to K+.
Figure 3. The three-dimensional structure and D3 pocket of the DX-3-htpX protease and its binding to different ions are shown by PyMOL. (A) The three-dimensional structure of the DX-3-htpX protease is shown as a cartoon and colored with a rainbow spectrum (N-terminal was purple, C-terminal was red). (B) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease. (C) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease binding to Ca2+. (D) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease binding to Zn2+. (E) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease binding to Cl. (F) The active site of the DX-3-htpX protease binding to K+.
Biology 13 00650 g003
Table 1. Prediction of protease components in gut protein samples based on protease inhibitors.
Table 1. Prediction of protease components in gut protein samples based on protease inhibitors.
Gut Protease Effective Protease InhibitorsProtease Prediction
LGDBM-1Pepsin inhibitor, PMSF, trypsin inhibitorPepsin, serine protease, trypsin
LGDBM-2PMSFSerine protease
LGDBM-3Trypsin inhibitorTrypsin
LGDBM-4E-64, pepsin inhibitor, PMSF, trypsin inhibitorCysteine protease, pepsin, serine protease, trypsin
LGDBM-5--
LGDBM-6--
Table 2. Identification of protease types based on mass spectrometry.
Table 2. Identification of protease types based on mass spectrometry.
Gut ProteaseGene NamesProtein NamesAccession No.Protein Identification/%Score
LGDBM-1 Glutathione S-transferaseP0851535141
DCDDermcidinP8160519110
PSMA6Proteasome subunit alpha type-6P28072774
LGDBM-3DCDDermcidinP816051292
FTSH8ATP-dependent zinc metalloproteaseQ8W585457
Glutathione S-transferaseP085151246
GGCTGamma-glutamyl cyclotransferaseQ32LE4533
LGDBM-4 Glutathione S-transferaseP085152075
DCDDermcidinP816051274
groELChaperonin GroELQ0KDR7569
CTSDCathepsin DQ4LAL9227
LGDBM-5DCDDermcidinP816051274
Glutathione S-transferaseP085152666
groELChaperonin GroEL 1A0K536223
LGDBM-6 Glutathione S-transferaseP0851526110
DCDDermcidinP816051285
Table 3. Active sites in the D3 pocket of the DX-3-htpX protease and their binding to different ions.
Table 3. Active sites in the D3 pocket of the DX-3-htpX protease and their binding to different ions.
ProteaseArea (Å2)Volume (Å3)Active Sites in the D3 Pocket
HtpX557.472837.241ARG4, LEU7, PHE8, VAL11, ALA52, SER55, LEU56, SER59, MET62, ALA63, TRP65, MET66, MET67, ASN113, ALA114, PHE115, ALA116, THR117, GLY118, MET132, VAL144, HIS147, GLU148, HIS151, MET157, THR160, THR161, LEU162, GLN164, ILE214, HIS217, SER218, ARG221, GLU222, MET238, ALA241, LEU242, LEU254, THR276, HIS277, ARG283
HtpX-Ca2+918.1541378.221LEU1, LYS3, ALA110, GLU111, VAL112, ASN113, ALA114, MET132, VAL144, HIS147, GLU148, ARG219, MET238, ALA241, LEU245, ARG246, THR248, THR249, SER250, VAL252, ASP253, GLN256, LYS257, ALA260, LYS263, ILE264, SER265, LYS267, GLU268, PHE270, SER271, ARG272, PHE274, SER275, HIS277, PRO278, PRO279, LEU280
HtpX-Cl714.286867.364LEU1, LYS3, GLU111, VAL112, ASN113, ALA114, MET132, VAL144, HIS147, GLU148, ARG219, MET238, ALA241, LEU242, LEU245, ARG246, THR248, THR249, SER250, VAL252, ASP253, GLN256, LYS257, ALA260, LYS263, ILE264, SER265, LYS267, GLU268, SER271, ARG272, SER275, HIS277, PRO278, PRO279, LEU280, GLU281, LYS282, ARG283
HtpX-K+925.5441335.237LEU1, LEU2, LYS3, ALA110, GLU111, VAL112, ASN113, ALA114, MET132, VAL144, HIS147, GLU148, ARG219, MET238, ALA241, LEU242, LEU245, ARG246, THR248, THR249, SER250, VAL252, ASP253, GLN256, LYS257, ALA260, LYS263, ILE264, SER265, LYS267, GLU268, PHE270, SER271, ARG272, PHE274, SER275, HIS277, PRO278, PRO279, LEU280, GLU281, LYS282, ARG283
HtpX-Zn2+811.0231179.127LEU1, LEU2, LYS3, ALA110, GLU111, VAL112, ASN113, ALA114, MET132, VAL144, HIS147, GLU148, ARG219, MET238, ALA241, LEU242, LEU245, ARG246, THR248, THR249, VAL252, ASP253, GLN256, LYS257, ALA260, LYS263, ILE264, SER265, LYS267, GLU268, SER271, ARG272, SER275, HIS277, PRO278, PRO279, LEU280, GLU281, ARG283
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, X.; Wu, F.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, Z.; Jia, Z.; Shi, F. Exploration of Protease Resources in the Gut of Omnivorous Gryllotalpa orientalis (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Biology 2024, 13, 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090650

AMA Style

Zheng X, Wu F, Zhao L, Zhou H, Zhou Z, Jia Z, Shi F. Exploration of Protease Resources in the Gut of Omnivorous Gryllotalpa orientalis (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Biology. 2024; 13(9):650. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090650

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Xiang, Fangtong Wu, Lu Zhao, He Zhou, Zhijun Zhou, Zhenhua Jia, and Fuming Shi. 2024. "Exploration of Protease Resources in the Gut of Omnivorous Gryllotalpa orientalis (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae)" Biology 13, no. 9: 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090650

APA Style

Zheng, X., Wu, F., Zhao, L., Zhou, H., Zhou, Z., Jia, Z., & Shi, F. (2024). Exploration of Protease Resources in the Gut of Omnivorous Gryllotalpa orientalis (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Biology, 13(9), 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090650

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop