Next Article in Journal
A Cybertaxonomic Revision of the “Crocidura pergrisea” Species Complex with a Special Focus on Endemic Rocky Shrews: Crocidura armenica and Crocidura arispa (Soricidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Travelling in Microphis (Teleostei: Syngnathidae) Otoliths with Two-Dimensional X-ray Fluorescence Maps: Twists and Turns on the Road to Strontium Incorporation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification, Elucidation and Deployment of a Cytoplasmic Male Sterility System for Hybrid Potato

1
Solynta, Dreijenlaan 2, 6703 HA Wageningen, The Netherlands
2
Plant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands
3
Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
4
Hogeschool Arnhem Nijmegen, Laan van Scheut 2, 6525 EM Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(6), 447; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060447
Submission received: 22 May 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 14 June 2024 / Published: 18 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pollination Biology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Conventional potato breeding has produced only limited genetic gain due to the polyploid nature of the crop. In recent years, hybrid potato breeding at the diploid level has been developed to overcome this limited genetic gain. In diploid potato breeding, homozygous inbred lines are developed by self-fertilization, enabling incremental improvements of the material in each generation. This type of breeding requires self-fertility, which makes hybridization of inbred lines labor-cumbersome and results in hybrids that produce many undesirable berries in the field. In many crop species, cytoplasmic male sterility is used to produce maternal inbred lines that are male sterile. In this study, we explore the antherless cytoplasmic male sterility system in potato. We identify a recessive locus that is required for sterility and we show that this trait is expressed in Phureja cytoplasm but not in Andigena or Tuberosum cytoplasm. We implemented this system in hybrid seed production and show that the resulting hybrids set far fewer berries in the field than male fertile controls.

Abstract

Recent advances in diploid F1 hybrid potato breeding rely on the production of inbred lines using the S-locus inhibitor (Sli) gene. As a result of this method, female parent lines are self-fertile and require emasculation before hybrid seed production. The resulting F1 hybrids are self-fertile as well and produce many undesirable berries in the field. Utilization of cytoplasmic male sterility would eliminate the need for emasculation, resulting in more efficient hybrid seed production and male sterile F1 hybrids. We observed plants that completely lacked anthers in an F2 population derived from an interspecific cross between diploid S. tuberosum and S. microdontum. We studied the antherless trait to determine its suitability for use in hybrid potato breeding. We mapped the causal locus to the short arm of Chromosome 6, developed KASP markers for the antherless (al) locus and introduced it into lines with T and A cytoplasm. We found that antherless type male sterility is not expressed in T and A cytoplasm, proving that it is a form of CMS. We hybridized male sterile al/al plants with P cytoplasm with pollen from al/al plants with T and A cytoplasm and we show that the resulting hybrids set significantly fewer berries in the field. Here, we show that the antherless CMS system can be readily deployed in diploid F1 hybrid potato breeding to improve hybridization efficiency and reduce berry set in the field.

1. Introduction

In recent years, potato (Solanum tuberosum) breeding has seen a shift towards breeding on the diploid level [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Conventional potato breeding is usually performed at the tetraploid level, where two heterozygous clones are crossed and selections take place among large numbers of F1 offspring. It requires many locations and years (10–15 years) of testing to select a single commercial cultivar and genetic gain is relatively low [6,7,8]. The push towards inbred line-based diploid F1 hybrid breeding is expected to speed up the breeding process and improve genetic gain by allowing continuous improvement of inbred lines. In addition, bulking up a new cultivar is fast as millions of hybrid seeds can be produced per year. Elite inbred lines can be further improved by introgression of favorable genes, such as resistance genes, by means of a backcrossing program [9].
To allow inbreeding of self-incompatible diploid potato clones, these clones can be crossed with a line containing the dominant allele of the Sli (S-locus inhibitor) gene, which enables self-fertilization [10,11,12]. The Sli gene, which encodes an F-box PP2-B10 protein, is expressed in pollen and interacts with the maternal components of the gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) system, the S-RNases, during pollination, leading to a breakdown of the GSI system [13,14]. From a breeding point of view, this system works well and has resulted in the production of inbred lines in multiple programs [4,5,6,15,16,17,18]. However, as a consequence of the presence of Sli, maternal inbred lines are self-fertile, which necessitates emasculation for hybrid seed production. The manual emasculation process takes time and may lead to reduced hybrid seed set due to the mechanical stress imposed on the flower buds. Another, more detrimental, effect is that the resulting F1 hybrid offspring are self-fertile as well. While F1 hybrid fertility is essential in crops where seeds are the end product, for potato, where the tubers are the end product, this is not the case. Primarily, this is because the seeds in the berries can remain viable in the field and produce a volunteer crop, which may act as a reservoir for diseases and disrupt crop rotation schemes [19]. Additionally, the growth of these berries and seeds may sequester photo-assimilates that might otherwise have been directed to tuber bulking [20]. A straightforward route to resolve these problems would be to introduce cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) to the maternal lines as is commonly performed in many F1 hybrid crops [21]. CMS systems exploit incongruities between organellar genomes and nuclear genomes, which lead to a failure to produce fertile pollen.
Sterilizing cytoplasms have been identified in many crop species, like rice, wheat, soybean, sunflower, rapeseed and several more [21]. CMS has been successfully implemented in breeding programs [22,23,24,25,26]. However, deployment of CMS in crops has not always gone smoothly. For instance, CMS has been associated with deleterious effects such as susceptibility to southern corn blight in maize and the inefficiencies of pollen donors or insect vectors in soybean [27,28]. In crop species where the end product is seed, implementations of CMS rely on the three-line system in which a CMS line is maintained by an isogenic maintainer line and male fertility in the hybrid is restored by crossing the CMS line to the restorer [29,30,31,32]. In potato, the end product is the belowground tubers, and restorer lines are not required. In fact, a major goal of implementing CMS in hybrid potato breeding would be to avoid fertility in the F1 hybrid to ensure minimal berry and seed production in the field.
Among potato and its wild relatives, many cytoplasm types are present. In a study of cultivated potato and closely related wild species, Hosaka and Sanetomo distinguished 129 chloroplast DNA (ctDNA) types and 63 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) types using RFLP, CAPS, SSR and SCAR markers, resulting in 164 unique cytoplasm types [33]. Hosaka and Sanetomo proposed to group these 164 cytoplasm types into 6 types (T, D, P, A, M and W). Cytoplasm types T, D and W have been associated with male sterility in multiple breeding populations, whereas P and A cytoplasm are usually associated with male fertility [34,35,36,37,38,39]. Recently, Santayana et al. observed segregation for male fertility among CIP potato breeding populations with T and D cytoplasm and identified parental lines that potentially contain nuclear Restorer of Fertility (Rf) genes for D and T cytoplasm [40]. On the cytoplasmic side, Sanetomo et al. identified a recombinant mitochondrial DNA molecule, RC-I, the presence of which is completely associated with tetrad sterility (T-CMS) among interspecific hybrids derived from S. stoloniferum Schltdl. & Bouché [41]. Interestingly, T-CMS must be the result of an interaction between a dominant S. tuberosum nuclear gene and the mitochondrial RC-I molecule, since hexaploid interspecific hybrids containing the complete S. stoloniferum genome still show T-CMS and thus should contain all dominant Rf genes present in the S. stoloniferum genome [42]. For the present study, only three cytoplasm types are relevant: A, P and T cytoplasm, originating from S. tuberosum ssp andigenum Hawkes, S. phureja Juz. et Buk. and S. tuberosum, respectively.
While most genotypes with P cytoplasm are male fertile, Endelman and Jansky observed segregation for anther length in an F2 derived from the cross DM × M6, whereby DM carries the P cytoplasm. In this population, 23% of the progeny had short anthers (SA) that did not shed any pollen. QTL analysis revealed a single recessive allele (sa) on the short arm of Chromosome 6 to be responsible for this SA phenotype. Interestingly, the recessive allele was inherited from the male fertile M6 genotype whose self-fertilized progeny do not show the SA phenotype, leading the authors to suggest that the SA phenotype is the result of an interaction between the recessive sa allele from M6 and the P cytoplasm from DM [43]. At Solynta, we observed complete absence of anthers (which we named antherless) in F2 genotypes derived from an interspecific hybrid S. tuberosum × S. microdontum subs. gigantophyllum. The antherless phenotype is similar to the short anther phenotype, except that the level of malformation varies, ranging from complete absence of anthers to somewhat malformed anthers. Given the importance of CMS for diploid hybrid potato breeding, we set out to elucidate the genetics and applicability of the antherless trait. We aimed to localize the causal locus in the nuclear genome via QTL analysis and to determine whether it is a form of CMS by introducing the trait to lines with non-P cytoplasm types. Here, we report on the mapping of the causal gene and the characterization of this CMS system for fertility traits. Proof of principle was obtained by exploiting this CMS system to produce male sterile maternal lines and hybrids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

An overview of all plant materials used in this study is available in Table S1. All S. tuberosum genotypes used in this study are derived from the founders of the Solynta breeding program as described in Lindhout et al. (2016) [1]. The donor of the antherless trait was derived from a CGN accession of S. microdontum subs. gigantophyllum, which is available from CGN (Wageningen, The Netherlands) under accession number CGN18200. S. microdontum subs. gigantophyllum is a potato wild relative with resistance against late blight and wart disease [44,45]. It is diploid and has an endosperm balance number of 2 and is therefore crossable with diploid S. tuberosum.

2.2. Crossing Conditions

To avoid any unwanted out-crossing and control plant growth as best as possible, experiments involving crossing were conducted in a greenhouse. Greenhouse conditions were the same as described in Eggers et al. (2021) [13].

2.3. Phenotypic Analysis of Male Fertility

Anther malformation was assessed on a scale from 0 to 3, where a score of 0 means complete absence of anthers and a score of 3 means normal anthers (Figure 1a). Flowers with anthers (scores 1–3) were vibrated using an electronic toothbrush while collecting the pollen in a micro-centrifuge tube. The amount of pollen shed was scored on a scale from 0–3 (where a score of 0 means no pollen shed, and a score of 3 means abundant pollen shed). Self-pollinations were made using the collected pollen, and the micro-centrifuge tubes with leftover pollen were placed in sealed containers with abundant silica gel beads to dry. To assess the viability of the pollen, one drop of acetocarmine was added to the pollen and incubated for one minute. The samples were then vortexed and 10 µL of the mix were pipetted into a counting chamber and observed with normal light microscopy. Stained and unstained pollen were counted and viability was scored using the formula: V i a b l e   p o l l e n   ( % ) = S t a i n a b l e   p o l l e n T o t a l   p o l l e n × 100 .

2.4. SeqSNP Genotyping, Linkage Analysis and QTL Mapping of Population BC2(P)-1

Leaf discs from 249 individuals of population BC2(P)-1 were sampled in 96-well plates and were genotyped via SeqSNP™ (LGC Genomics GmbH, Berlin, Germany) [46]. SNPs were extracted from the SeqSNP™ reads using the method described in Adams et al. (2023) [47], resulting in 2116 SNPs. SNPs that were homozygous alternate between F2-1 and Solyntus were selected. SNPs with more than 10% missing data and duplicate SNPs originating from the same SeqSNP™ probes were removed, resulting in a genotypic dataset of 244 SNPs (Table S2). This dataset was converted to Joinmap coding and genetic maps for all 12 chromosomes were created using Joinmap 4.1 [48] with population type BC1 and default settings (Table S3). QTL mapping was performed using interval mapping in MapQTL6 [49].

2.5. KASP Marker Development and Genotyping

Between 30 and 50 mg of leaf material was collected from genotype F2-1 and submitted for DNA extraction, library preparation and Illumina PE150 sequencing with 30× coverage by Novogene UK Company LTD (Cambridge, UK). The reads were mapped to DM4.03 with BWA and variants were called using BCFtools. Several thousand high-quality variants in F2-1 and Solyntus were inspected in jBrowse to determine suitability for KASP genotyping. For KASP genotyping, leaf discs from population BC2(P)-1 were sampled in 96-well plates and submitted to VHLgenetics (Wageningen, The Netherlands) for DNA extraction and KASP analysis as described in Eggers et al. (2021) [13]. The quality of the resulting KASP marker data was assessed using SNPviewer (lgcgroup.com/products/genotyping-software/snpviewer); markers that did not segregate or showed unexpected segregation were discarded from further analysis. For the remaining markers, segregation ratios were tested using χ2 tests with the null hypothesis that the antherless locus segregates in mendelian 1:2:1 ratio. p-values were calculated from the χ2 to determine the likelihood that the null hypothesis of mendelian 1:2:1 segregation is true.

2.6. Field Experiment

The field trial was designed with plots of four ridges of 32 plants per plot with 8 plants per ridge and with plots replicated in two randomized blocks. The plants were spaced at 25 cm on each ridge, and the distance between ridges was 75 cm. Plots were separated by an empty row, one row of cultivar Bergerac, and then another empty row. The design included the 13 antherless proof-of-concept hybrids and three male fertile hybrids as controls. The seeds were sown and raised in a greenhouse and transplanted six weeks after sowing to a field in Heelsum, The Netherlands on the 17th of May 2023. Crop handling was performed according to standard agricultural practices, as described by Kacheyo et al. (2023) [50]. At 108 days after transplanting, we harvested all berries from the plants on the middle two ridges of each plot, including the berries that were already detached from the plants but were present between the two middle ridges. All berries were bulked per plot in a mesh bag and fresh weight was determined and used for analysis. The significance of the difference in berry weight per plant between the antherless plants and male fertile controls was determined using a t-test. Two datapoints with more than two times the standard deviation from the mean among the antherless plants were removed for the t-test.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of the Antherless Phenotype and Development of a Mapping Population

In a breeding program at Solynta, we identified plants lacking anthers in an F2 population derived from a cross between S. tuberosum × S. microdontum subs. gigantophyllum (F2-1). We designated this phenotype “antherless”. In this small population of 50 plants, we identified three individuals that completely lacked anthers (Figure 1a, score = 0), suggesting that the phenotype is caused by two recessive loci or one locus with severely skewed inheritance. We set out to characterize the loci that are responsible for the antherless phenotype, to elucidate the genetics and to determine the contribution of cytoplasm types. To generate a dedicated mapping population, we pollinated one antherless plant, F2-1, with pollen from the S. tuberosum genotype Solyntus [51]. In the resulting BC1 population BC1(P), all plants had normal anthers, confirming the recessive nature of the antherless gene(s). To study this locus in more detail, we backcrossed BC1(P)-1 to F2-1 to generate population BC2(P)-1.

3.2. Segregation of the Antherless Phenotype in Population BC2(P)-1

In the BC2(P)-1 population, we distinguished four anther phenotypes, complete absence of anthers (score 0), severely reduced anthers (score 1), moderately reduced anthers (score 2) and normal anthers (score 3) (Figure 1a). Plants that lacked anthers or showed reduced anthers (scores 0–2) never released any pollen upon vibration with an electric toothbrush. We grew 252 individuals from this BC2 population in the greenhouse and obtained 225 flowering plants (Table S4). We identified 84 genotypes which lacked or had reduced anthers, whereas the remaining 141 plants all had normal anthers. Among the 84 plants with malformed anthers, 32 showed complete absence of anthers, 35 had severely reduced anthers, and 17 plants had moderately reduced anthers. We genotyped the population using SeqSNP, resulting in 656 segregating markers. After removing non-informative markers, we generated a map with 153 SNPs covering 12 chromosomes which we used for QTL mapping of the anther phenotype. We found one highly significant QTL on the top of Chromosome 6 (LOD = 80.92 Figure 1c). Interestingly, other flower-related traits, such as number of floral buds, bud abortion and corolla shape, mapped to this locus as well (Table S5). Further inspection of individual recombinants showed that the causal locus is located in a 25.12 Mb interval between 5.59 and 30.71 Mb on the reference genome DM6.1 [52]. All plants that are heterozygous in this interval have normal anthers (score = 3), whereas those individuals that are homozygous for the S. microdontum haplotype all have reduced or absent anthers (score = 0, 1 or 2), indicating that in this population, antherless is effectively a monogenic recessive trait (Figure 1c). This locus is designated Al. We observed significant segregation distortion at the top of Chromosome 6, where the Al locus is located (χ2 = 14.33, p < 0.001) (Figure 1d).
To reduce the size of the interval, we screened 2011 new seedlings from a closely related BC2 (BC2(P)-2). We screened this population for recombination in the interval using four KASP markers, two of which were located at the proximal side and the other two located at the distal side of the 25.12 Mb interval. We identified only 16 putative recombinants in this region. As the number of these putative recombinants compared to the size of the population (n = 2011) was low, these results could also be explained by some rare errors in the marker analyses. Therefore, we genotyped these 16 putative recombinants with 25 additional KASP markers. Indeed, the genotypic data of these additional markers showed that 2 of the 16 putative recombinants had a recombination just outside the interval at the centromeric side, whereas the other 14 likely resulted from genotyping errors in the initial genotyping with the flanking markers (Table S6).
Figure 1. Population BC2(P)-1 segregates for anther length. (a) Anther phenotypes in BC1 population BC2(P)-1 scored from 0 (complete absence of anthers) to 3 (normal anthers). (b) Genetic map of Chromosome 6. (c) QTL analysis for anther score reveals a significant QTL on the top of Chromosome 6. (d) Segregation distortion on the top of Chromosome 6 reduces the number of antherless plants. In red, the fraction of plants heterozygous per locus is shown and in green the fraction of plants homozygous for the antherless donor allele is shown.
Figure 1. Population BC2(P)-1 segregates for anther length. (a) Anther phenotypes in BC1 population BC2(P)-1 scored from 0 (complete absence of anthers) to 3 (normal anthers). (b) Genetic map of Chromosome 6. (c) QTL analysis for anther score reveals a significant QTL on the top of Chromosome 6. (d) Segregation distortion on the top of Chromosome 6 reduces the number of antherless plants. In red, the fraction of plants heterozygous per locus is shown and in green the fraction of plants homozygous for the antherless donor allele is shown.
Biology 13 00447 g001

3.3. Expression of the Antherless Phenotype in A and T Cytoplasm Types

The results so far show that homozygosity for the recessive al allele leads to the antherless phenotype in material with P cytoplasm. However, to apply the antherless system in breeding for male sterile hybrids, it is important to know whether it is a form of CMS, and we set out to introduce the al allele in lines with different cytoplasm types. We selected one clone from the proprietary Solynta genebank, D02, that has the A-type cytoplasm, and D03, D12 and two dihaploids from cultivar VR808 that have the T-type cytoplasm. These cytoplasm types were identified using pedigree analyses and were confirmed by using the multiplex PCR markers as described by Hosaka and Sanetomo [53] (Figure S1). We crossed these five cytoplasm type genitors as females with BC1-1 (Alal) and used six al-specific KASP markers to identify BC2 plants that received the recessive al allele from BC1-1. We selected eight self-fertile Alal heterozygous BC2 plants and self-fertilized these to proceed to the BC2F2 generation. The BC2F2 populations were genotyped with four KASP markers in the interval to determine the genotype at the Al locus. Interestingly, we observed distorted segregation in both directions; two populations, BC2F2(A)-1 and BC2F2(A)-2, showed significant distortion towards the Al allele, five populations showed no significant distortion, and one population showed significant distortion in favor of the al allele (Table 1). From all eight populations, we selected all plants that were homozygous for the antherless haplotype (alal) and transplanted these to pots. For the populations for which we had fewer than 25 alal plants, we added Alal and AlAl plants to fill up to at least 25 genotypes per population, allowing us to compare the effects of the genotype of the Al locus on the anther phenotype (Table S7).
Generally, we observed poor fertility in the F2 populations, with 80 of the 200 BC2F2 plants not producing any open flowers. Among the flowering F2 plants, anther morphology segregated, ranging from severely reduced anthers to normal anthers, which we scored using the same 0–3 scale. Pollen release segregated as well, with many plants not releasing any pollen at all. Interestingly, the level of anther malformation and pollen release was independent of the genotype of the Al locus, suggesting that factors other than the antherless locus cause reduced fertility in these populations. Most importantly, from the 120 flowering F2 plants, 8 produced seed after self-pollination, of which three plants were homozygous alal while the other four were heterozygous Alal (Figure 2, Table 2). Two of the alal homozygous self-fertile F2 plants have the A-type cytoplasm, and the third has the T-type cytoplasm. These results are in line with the hypothesis that the homozygous alal genotype results in male sterility in the P cytoplasm type but not in T and A cytoplasm.
To provide further evidence for the male fertility of alal plants with A and T cytoplasm, we planted five tubers each from four alal F2 plants with A cytoplasm and two alal F2 plants with the T cytoplasm. In addition, we sowed F3 seed from seven self-fertile F2 plants (two with A cytoplasm and fixed for the al allele and five with T cytoplasm of which four are fixed for the al allele, and two of which segregate for Al and al (Table 2)). We genotyped the tuber-grown BC2F2 plants, as well the TPS-grown F3 seedlings with the same KASP markers that we used in the TPS-raised BC2F2 populations. All tuber-grown F2 plants and F3 populations derived from alal F2 plants were confirmed to be alal, whereas the F3 populations derived from Alal heterozygous F2 plants segregated for the Al locus. Interestingly, the BC2F2 plants raised from tubers from genotypes BC2F2(A)-1-29, BC2F2(A)-2-44 and BC2F2(T)-3-16 showed improved self-fertility compared to the same genotypes raised from TPS, suggesting improved vigor of the tuber-raised plants compared to seedling-raised plants (Table 3). The F3 populations suffered from inbreeding depression showing overall poor fertility. Nevertheless, seven alal homozygous F3 plants with A cytoplasm and six alal homozygous F3 plants with T cytoplasm produced berries and seed upon self-pollination, ranging from 15 to 297 seeds per plant (Table 4).
Taken together, the apparent male fertility of the tuber-raised alal homozygous F2 plants and the seedling-raised alal homozygous F3 plants provide clear evidence that homozygosity for the al allele does not result in male sterility in T and A cytoplasm, providing convincing evidence that the antherless trait is a form of cytoplasmic male sterility.

3.4. Application and Deployment of the Antherless Gene

With the antherless CMS system, an improved inbred line-based hybrid breeding system becomes feasible, whereby male sterile inbred lines and hybrids are generated. After an initial cross between an elite inbred line with P cytoplasm and an al donor line, markers can be used to select heterozygous Alal progeny after the initial cross and after each round of self-fertilization or backcrossing. When a sufficient level of homozygosity has been achieved, a final round of self-fertilization can be performed and homozygous alal progeny can be selected using the same markers, resulting in a male sterile maternal inbred line. Similarly, after an initial cross between an elite line with T or A cytoplasm and an al donor, the markers can be used to select for heterozygosity during backcrossing or homozygosity during inbreeding, resulting in male fertile alal inbred lines. With this system, emasculation of the maternal lines is no longer necessary and hybridization will result in male sterile F1 hybrids. To determine the feasibility of this system, we fertilized five male sterile alal homozygous lines in P cytoplasm with pollen from four male fertile alal homozygous lines with A or T cytoplasm and obtained seeds from 13 crosses (Table S8). Next, we planted these 13 male sterile hybrids together with male fertile control hybrids in a field trial and harvested all berries at the end of the growing season. While the male sterile antherless hybrids did set some berries, the total be yield was significantly lower than those of male fertile control hybrids (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

Diploid hybrid potato breeding is based on the generation of homozygous inbred parent lines by continuous self-fertilization and hybrid cultivars by crossing these parent lines. For inbreeding, self-fertilized berry set is crucial, while this is an undesired character for the cultivation of potato in the field. In this study, we investigated the antherless CMS system which can be used to generate potato hybrids that set few berries in the field. We identified a recessive allele (al) on the short arm of Chromosome 6 of S. microdontum subsp. gigantophyllum which results in complete male sterility due to malformed or absent anthers in the presence of the P cytoplasm (Figure 1a).
Previously, Endelman and Jansky identified the Sa locus, involved in male sterility, which was mapped to the short arm of Chromosome 6 in an F2 population from the cross between DM and M6. The recessive allele sa originates from the M6 parent, and the short anther phenotype is likely a result of an interaction between the Sa locus and the P cytoplasm from DM [43]. Given the similarity between the antherless and short anther traits of the Al and the Sa locus, it is possible that these loci are identical. However, as both loci originate from distant Solanum species, these loci might also be different. Therefore, here we use the designation “Al locus” to refer to the antherless locus from S. microdontum subsp. gigantophyllum
In this study, we have found that the antherless trait is expressed in P, but not in T and A cytoplasm, proving that antherless is a form of CMS and that it is the result of an interaction between the nuclear genome and the cytoplasm. It is likely that the dominant allele of the Al locus encodes a fertility restorer that is required for fertility in genotypes carrying the P cytoplasm. Unfortunately, our efforts to fine-map the Al locus were hindered by a lack of recombination in the region of the Al locus. Among 2011 BC2 individuals, we did not find any true recombinants in the 25.12 Mb interval on the short arm of Chromosome 6 (Table S3). The suppression of recombination in this interval on Chromosome 6 is observed in many potato genetic maps, suggesting that this region is pericentromeric and that fine-mapping approaches will not reduce the size of the interval [16,43,54,55,56,57]. Thus, identification of the causal gene requires an alternative strategy. One strategy would be to perform untargeted mutagenesis on seed from a population derived from a cross between an alal and an AlAl individual wherein the maternal parent has the P cytoplasm. All progeny from such a cross are heterozygous Alal and should have normal male fertile anthers. However, when the dominant Al allele of such a genotype is knocked out, it results in an alal genotype, which is antherless and can easily be identified among the fertile plants of this backcross population. The causal mutation can then be identified by comparing sequence data from the mutant with the parental genomes. Such a strategy has been successful in the cloning of several genes from genomic regions with suppressed recombination and could be used to identify the al allele [58,59,60]. Alternatively, a targeted mutagenesis approach could reveal the causal gene for the antherless phenotype. This approach would rely on knowledge about nuclear Restorer of Fertility (Rf) genes involved in CMS in other crops and targeted knock-out of candidate genes using CRISPR-Cas. Multiple Rf genes have been identified, and the majority of those encode pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins [61,62]. PPR encoding genes have been implicated in restoration of fertility in crop species such as pepper [63], rice [64], radish [65,66], sorghum [67], soybean [68], cotton [69,70], and others. These Rf-PPR exert their function in mitochondria, where they bind CMS inducing mitochondrial mRNAs, leading to reduced levels of sterilizing protein via mRNA destabilization, modification or translation inhibition [64,71,72,73]. In potato, Anisimova et al. identified 38 sequence fragments with homology to petunia Rf-PPR592 and Capsicum annuum CaPPR6. These fragments map to five genomic loci of the potato reference genome DM [74]. Interestingly two of the identified Rf-PPR genes are located within the interval of the Al locus and are good candidates as causal genes underlying the antherless and short anther traits.
The Al locus is located on the short arm of Chromosome 6 in a pericentromeric region where other floral traits like bud abortion and corolla shape mapped to as well. It is unclear whether the same causal genes are involved in anther malformation, bud abortion and corolla shape. It is not possible to remove any linked deleterious alleles from the interval due to the lack of recombination. However, in this study we did not observe obvious deleterious linkage drag associated with the antherless locus, but it is possible that linkage drag may reveal itself in more advanced materials and more detailed agronomical studies. We observed variation in the severity of anther malformation among the alal homozygous plants from population BC2(P)-1, but the genetic background of this variation remains unknown. The severity of anther malformation is relatively stable within individual plants and their clonal offspring, but genetic analysis within the alal homozygous group did not reveal any significant QTL (Table S5). It is possible that the combined effect of multiple segregating small-effect loci are responsible for the observed variation in anther malformation, although epigenetic control of such loci cannot be excluded. Further studies with large populations which are fixed for the al allele could resolve this question.
The implementation of CMS in hybrid potato breeding will provide two major advantages: (1) seed production becomes more efficient by eliminating the need to emasculate maternal flowers and (2) ware crop production will benefit from significantly reduced berry set on the field. In contrast to crops like maize and rice, where the seed are the commercial end product, implementation of CMS in potato does not require fertility to be restored in the hybrid, and hence a three-line system is redundant. Here, we show that the antherless CMS system can be used to develop alal male sterile maternal lines with P cytoplasm and male fertile alal lines with T or A cytoplasm and that the hybrids derived from crosses between these parental lines hardly set any berries in the field. Male sterile maternal alal lines can be generated by introduction of the al allele in the breeding germplasm and subsequent marker-assisted selection for Alal heterozygosity upon inbreeding. When such an inbred line has met the criteria for becoming a female parent, breeders can easily select alal homozygotes based on the clear anther phenotype and proceed with test crosses or commercial seed production. We observed a reduction in fertility upon inbreeding in the BC2F2 and BC2F3 populations; it is not clear to what extent this is caused by the cytoplasm type. While it is possible that T and A cytoplasm affect fertility upon inbreeding, the BC2F2 and BC2F3 populations were derived from crosses with non-inbred cytoplasm donors which likely contained significant recessive genetic load. This genetic load may have resulted in inbreeding depression and the associated reduction in fertility, which are commonly observed during inbreeding of potato, especially in early inbred generations [75,76,77,78]. So, we successfully inbred alal lines with T and A cytoplasm up to the BC2F4 generation, used the alal BC2F2 as male parents in hybrid crosses with male sterile alal lines and showed that the resulting hybrids produce far fewer berries than male fertile controls. However, the antherless hybrids did still set some berries, likely caused by insect or wind-driven cross-pollination. Many male fertile diploid potato genotypes were present in and around our field experiment, providing ample fertile pollen which could have fertilized the antherless hybrids. In future commercial application of the antherless CMS system, the produced CMS hybrids will likely be grown in fields without male fertile diploid pollen donors where the CMS hybrids would likely set fewer or no berries at all. We consider this an effective proof of principle of the antherless CMS system. Further research is needed to determine how inbreeding depression in T and A cytoplasm affects fertility and plant vigor and whether linkage drag is an issue for the Al locus. Future research may also focus on identification of the causal gene and several good leads are available.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, in this study we identified the recessive al locus on chr06 that causes male sterility in diploid potato with P cytoplasm but not in A and T cytoplasm. Efforts to more precisely localize the locus were not successful due to a lack of recombination in this region of chr06. We implemented the antherless CMS system in a hybrid breeding scheme and show that the resulting F1 hybrid set significantly fewer berries under field conditions. Further exploration of this trait could focus on the identification of the causal nuclear gene via a candidate gene approach and CRISPR-Cas-induced knock-out, as well as the identification of the corresponding mitochondrial or chloroplast gene.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13060447/s1, Figure S1: Cytoplasm type determination using multiplex PCR markers as described by Hosaka and Sanetomo; Table S1: Plant materials used in this study; Table S2: Genotypic data of population BC2(P)-1; Table S3: Genetic map of population BC2(P)-1; Table S4: Phenotypic data from population BC2(P)-1; Table S5: QTL identified in population BC2(P)-1; Table S6: Genotypic data from putative recombinants from population BC2(P)-2; Table S7: Phenotypic data from BC2F2 populations with A and T cytoplasm; Table S8: Berry weights per plant of antherless and male fertile control plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.-J.E., M.E.d.V., Y.S., P.L. and R.G.F.V.; methodology, E.-J.E., M.E.d.V. and P.L.; formal analysis, E.-J.E.; investigation, E.-J.E., E.v.d.P. and M.F.; resources, Y.S.; data curation, E.-J.E., E.v.d.P. and M.F.; writing—original draft preparation, E.-J.E.; writing—review and editing, E.-J.E., M.E.d.V., C.W.B.B., R.G.F.V. and P.L.; visualization, E.-J.E.; supervision, M.E.d.V., P.L., C.W.B.B. and R.G.F.V.; project administration, M.E.d.V., R.G.F.V. and E.-J.E.; funding acquisition, E.-J.E., P.L. and R.G.F.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Dutch Research Council, grant number NWA.17.023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the help from Shadee Martis and Alycia Klerkx for their efforts in the phenotypic analysis of the recombinant screening population and the BC2F3 populations. We also acknowledge the Solynta bioinformatics, greenhouse and agronomy teams for their help with WGS data analysis, marker development, plant raising and maintenance and field trial execution.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Ernst-Jan Eggers, Ying Su, Michiel Erik de Vries, Christian Bachem and Pim Lindhout were employed by the company Solynta. Authors Esmee van der Poel, Martijn Flipsen and Richard Visser declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lindhout, P.; de Vries, M.; ter Maat, M.; Ying, S.; Viquez-Zamora, M.; van Heusden, S. Hybrid Potato Breeding for Improved Varieties. In Achieving Sustainable Cultivation of Potatoes; Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: London, UK, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, C.; Yang, Z.; Tang, D.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, P.; Li, D.; Zhu, G.; Xiong, X.; Shang, Y.; Li, C.; et al. Genome Design of Hybrid Potato. Cell 2021, 184, 3873–3883.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jansky, S.H.; Charkowski, A.O.; Douches, D.S.; Gusmini, G.; Richael, C.; Bethke, P.C.; Spooner, D.M.; Novy, R.G.; De Jong, H.; De Jong, W.S.; et al. Reinventing Potato as a Diploid Inbred Line-Based Crop. Crop Sci. 2016, 56, 1412–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alsahlany, M.; Enciso-Rodriguez, F.; Lopez-Cruz, M.; Coombs, J.; Douches, D.S. Developing Self-Compatible Diploid Potato Germplasm through Recurrent Selection. Euphytica 2021, 217, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hosaka, K.; Sanetomo, R. Creation of a Highly Homozygous Diploid Potato Using the S Locus Inhibitor (Sli) Gene. Euphytica 2020, 216, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lindhout, P.; Meijer, D.; Schotte, T.; Hutten, R.C.B.; Visser, R.G.F.; van Eck, H.J. Towards F1 Hybrid Seed Potato Breeding. Potato Res. 2011, 54, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Douches, D.S.; Maas, D.; Jastrzebski, K.; Chase, R.W. Assessment of Potato Breeding Progress in the USA over the Last Century. Crop Sci. 1996, 36, 1544–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jansky, S. Breeding, Genetics, and Cultivar Development. In Advances in Potato Chemistry and Technology; Singh, J., Kaur, L., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 26–27. [Google Scholar]
  9. Su, Y.; Viquez-Zamora, M.; den Uil, D.; Sinnige, J.; Kruyt, H.; Vossen, J.; Lindhout, P.; van Heusden, S. Introgression of Genes for Resistance against Phytophthora Infestans in Diploid Potato. Am. J. Potato Res. 2020, 97, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hosaka, K.; Hanneman, R.E. Genetics of Self-Compatibility in a Self-Incompatible Wild Diploid Potato Species Solanum Chacoense. 1. Detection of an S Locus Inhibitor (Sli) Gene. Euphytica 1998, 99, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Clot, C.R.; Polzer, C.; Prodhomme, C.; Schuit, C.; Engelen, C.J.M.; Hutten, R.C.B.; van Eck, H.J. The Origin and Widespread Occurrence of Sli-Based Self-Compatibility in Potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2713–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Birhman, R.K.; Hosaka, K. Production of Inbred Progenies of Diploid Potatoes Using an S -Locus Inhibitor (Sli) Gene, and Their Characterization. Genome 2000, 502, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Eggers, E.J.; van der Burgt, A.; van Heusden, S.A.W.; de Vries, M.E.; Visser, R.G.F.; Bachem, C.W.B.; Lindhout, P. Neofunctionalisation of the Sli Gene Leads to Self-Compatibility and Facilitates Precision Breeding in Potato. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, B.; Tang, F.; Li, F.; Liao, Q.; Tang, D.; Peng, Z.; Jia, Y.; Gao, M.; et al. A NonS-Locus F-Box Gene Breaks Self-Incompatibility in Diploid Potatoes. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Phumichai, C.; Mori, M.; Kobayashi, A.; Kamijima, O.; Hosaka, K. Toward the Development of Highly Homozygous Diploid Potato Lines Using the Self-Compatibility Controlling Sli Gene. Genome 2005, 48, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kaiser, N.R.; Billings, G.; Coombs, J.; Buell, C.R.; Enciso-Rodríguez, F.; Douches, D.S. Self-Fertility and Resistance to the Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa Decemlineata) in a Diploid Solanum Chacoense Recombinant Inbred Line Population. Crop Sci. 2021, 61, 3392–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jansky, S.H.; Chung, Y.S.; Kittipadukal, P. M6: A Diploid Potato Inbred Line for Use in Breeding and Genetics Research. J. Plant Regist. 2014, 8, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, C.; Wang, P.; Tang, D.; Yang, Z.; Lu, F.; Qi, J.; Tawari, N.R.; Shang, Y.; Li, C.; Huang, S. The Genetic Basis of Inbreeding Depression in Potato. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 374–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Veerman, A.; Van Loon, C.D. Prevention of Berry Formation in Potato Plants (Solanum tuberosum L.) by Single Foliar Applications of Herbicides or Growth Regulators. Potato Res. 1993, 36, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bartholdi, W.L. Influence of Flowering and Fruiting Upon Vegetative Growth and Tuber Yield in the Potato; Minn. Tech. Bull 150; University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1942. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ter Steeg, E.M.S.; Struik, P.C.; Visser, R.G.F.; Lindhout, P. Crucial Factors for the Feasibility of Commercial Hybrid Breeding in Food Crops. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gramaje, L.V.; Caguiat, J.D.; Enriquez, J.O.S.; dela Cruz, Q.D.; Millas, R.A.; Carampatana, J.E.; Tabanao, D.A.A. Heterosis and Combining Ability Analysis in CMS Hybrid Rice. Euphytica 2020, 216, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martín, A.C.; Atienza, S.G.; Ramírez, M.C.; Barro, F.; Martín, A. Male Fertility Restoration of Wheat in Hordeum Chilense Cytoplasm Is Associated with 6HchS Chromosome Addition. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2008, 59, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Martín, A.C.; Castillo, A.; Atienza, S.G.; Rodríguez-Suárez, C. A Cytoplasmic Male Sterility (CMS) System in Durum Wheat. Mol. Breed. 2018, 38, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tyagi, V.; Dhillon, S.K.; Kaushik, P.; Kaur, G. Characterization for Drought Tolerance and Physiological Efficiency in Novel Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Sources of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Agronomy 2018, 8, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, J.; Nadeem, M.; Sun, G.; Wang, X.; Qiu, L. Male Sterility in Soybean: Occurrence, Molecular Basis and Utilization. Plant Breed. 2019, 138, 659–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bruns, H.A. Southern Corn Leaf Blight: A Story Worth Retelling. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Graybosch, R.A.; Palmer, R.G. Male Sterility in Soybean (Glycine max). I. Phenotypic Expression of the Ms2 Mutant. Am. J. Bot. 1985, 72, 1738–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Balaji Suresh, P.; Srikanth, B.; Hemanth Kishore, V.; Subhakara Rao, I.; Vemireddy, L.R.; Dharika, N.; Sundaram, R.M.; Ramesha, M.S.; Sambasiva Rao, K.R.S.; Viraktamath, B.C.; et al. Fine Mapping of Rf3 and Rf4 Fertility Restorer Loci of WA-CMS of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Validation of the Developed Marker System for Identification of Restorer Lines. Euphytica 2012, 187, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, X.; Guo, L.; Qi, T.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Xing, C. Genome-Wide Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of CMS-D2 and Its Maintainer and Restorer Lines in Upland Cotton. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. El-Rady, A.; Ayman, G.; Soliman, G. Identification of Maintainer and Restorer Lines Based on CMS System for Developing Hybrid Wheat in Egypt. Egypt. J. Agric. Res. 2023, 101, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, Y.J.; Zhang, D. Molecular Control of Male Fertility for Crop Hybrid Breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hosaka, K.; Sanetomo, R. Comparative Differentiation in Mitochondrial and Chloroplast DNA among Cultivated Potatoes and Closely Related Wild Species. Genes Genet. Syst. 2009, 84, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dionne, L.A. Cytoplasmic Sterility in Derivatives of Solanum Demissum. Am. Potato J. 1961, 38, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ortiz, R.; Iwanaga, M.; Peloquin, S.J. Male Sterility and 2n Pollen in 4x Progenies Derived from 4x × 2x and 4x × 4x Crosses in Potatoes. Potato Res. 1993, 36, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lössl, A.; Götz, M.; Braun, A.; Wenzel, G. Molecular Markers for Cytoplasm in Potato: Male Sterility and Contribution of Different Plastid-Mitochondrial Configurations to Starch Production. Euphytica 2000, 116, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hoopes, R.W.; Plaisted, R.L.; Cubillos, A.G. Yield and Fertility of Reciprocal-Cross Tuberosum-Andigena Hybrids. Am. Potato J. 1980, 57, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Staub, J.E.; Grun, P.; Amoah, V. Cytoplasmic Evaluations during Substitution Backcrossing in Solanum. Potato Res. 1982, 25, 299–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grun, P. Cytoplasmic Sterilities That Separate the Group Tuberosum Cultivated Potato from Its Putative Tetraploid Ancestor. Evolution 1973, 27, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Santayana, M.; Aponte, M.; Kante, M.; Gastelo, M. Cytoplasmic Male Sterility Incidence in Potato Breeding Populations with Late Blight Resistance and Identification of Breeding Lines with a Potential Fertility Restorer Mechanism. Plants 2022, 11, 3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sanetomo, R.; Akai, K.; Nashiki, A. Discovery of a Novel Mitochondrial DNA Molecule Associated with Tetrad Pollen Sterility in Potato. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sanetomo, R.; Nashiki, A. Identification of the Tetrad-Sterility-Causing Solanum Stoloniferum Schltdl. & Bouché Cytoplasm in Interspecific Hybrids with S. tuberosum L. Genet Resour. Crop Evol. 2021, 68, 3383–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Endelman, J.B.; Jansky, S.H. Genetic Mapping with an Inbred Line-Derived F2 Population in Potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Spooner, D.M.; Ghislain, M.; Simon, R.; Jansky, S.H.; Gavrilenko, T. Systematics, Diversity, Genetics, and Evolution of Wild and Cultivated Potatoes. Bot. Rev. 2014, 80, 283–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lin, X.; Torres Ascurra, Y.C.; Fillianti, H.; Dethier, L.; de Rond, L.; Domazakis, E.; Aguilera-Galvez, C.; Kiros, A.Y.; Jacobsen, E.; Visser, R.G.F.; et al. Recognition of Pep-13/25 MAMPs of Phytophthora Localizes to an RLK Locus in Solanum microdontum. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1037030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Parmentier, J.; Fartmann, B.; Winkler, S.; Arvidsson, S.; Osterkamp, S.; Zimmermann, W.; Heath, J.D. SeqSNP, a Massively Parallel Marker Screening Approach–High-Speed and High-Throughput Genomic Selection for Plants and Livestock. In Proceedings of the Plant and Animal Genome XXVI Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 13–17 January 2018. [Google Scholar]
  47. Adams, J.; de Vries, M.; van Eeuwijk, F. Efficient Genomic Prediction of Yield and Dry Matter in Hybrid Potato. Plants 2023, 12, 2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Van Ooijen, J.W. JoinMap®4, Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps in Experimental Populations; Kyazma BV: Wagening, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  49. van Ooijen, J.W. Accuracy of Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci in Autogamous Species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1992, 84, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kacheyo, O.C.; de Vries, M.E.; van Dijk, L.C.M.; Schneider, H.M.; Struik, P.C. Agronomic Consequences of Growing Field-Transplanted Hybrid Potato Seedlings. Crop Sci 2024, 64, 1093–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. van Lieshout, N.; van der Burgt, A.; de Vries, M.E.; ter Maat, M.; Eickholt, D.; Esselink, D.; van Kaauwen, M.P.W.; Kodde, L.P.; Visser, R.G.F.; Lindhout, P.; et al. Solyntus, the New Highly Contiguous Reference Genome for Potato (Solanum tuberosum). G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2020, 10, 3489–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pham, G.M.; Hamilton, J.P.; Wood, J.C.; Burke, J.T.; Zhao, H.; Vaillancourt, B.; Ou, S.; Jiang, J.; Robin Buell, C. Construction of a Chromosome-Scale Long-Read Reference Genome Assembly for Potato. Gigascience 2020, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hosaka, K.; Sanetomo, R. Development of a Rapid Identification Method for Potato Cytoplasm and Its Use for Evaluating Japanese Collections. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125, 1237–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Massa, A.N.; Manrique-Carpintero, N.C.; Coombs, J.J.; Zarka, D.G.; Boone, A.E.; Kirk, W.W.; Hackett, C.A.; Bryan, G.J.; Douches, D.S. Genetic Linkage Mapping of Economically Important Traits in Cultivated Tetraploid Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2015, 5, 2357–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. da Silva Pereira, G.; Mollinari, M.; Schumann, M.J.; Clough, M.E.; Zeng, Z.B.; Yencho, G.C. The Recombination Landscape and Multiple QTL Mapping in a Solanum Tuberosum Cv. ‘Atlantic’-Derived F1 Population. Heredity 2021, 126, 817–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bourke, P.M.; Voorrips, R.E.; Kranenburg, T.; Jansen, J.; Visser, R.G.F.; Maliepaard, C. Integrating Haplotype-Specific Linkage Maps in Tetraploid Species Using SNP Markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 2211–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sharma, S.K.; Bolser, D.; de Boer, J.; Sønderkær, M.; Amoros, W.; Carboni, M.F.; D’Ambrosio, J.M.; de la Cruz, G.; Di Genova, A.; Douches, D.S.; et al. Construction of Reference Chromosome-Scale Pseudomolecules for Potato: Integrating the Potato Genome with Genetic and Physical Maps. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2013, 3, 2031–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Harkess, A.; Zhou, J.; Xu, C.; Bowers, J.E.; Van Der Hulst, R.; Ayyampalayam, S.; Mercati, F.; Riccardi, P.; McKain, M.R.; Kakrana, A.; et al. The Asparagus Genome Sheds Light on the Origin and Evolution of a Young Y Chromosome. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Harkess, A.; Huang, K.; van der Hulst, R.; Tissen, B.; Caplan, J.L.; Koppula, A.; Batish, M.; Meyers, B.C.; Leebens-Mack, J. Sex Determination by Two Y-Linked Genes in Garden Asparagus. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 1790–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Underwood, C.J.; Vijverberg, K.; Rigola, D.; Okamoto, S.; Oplaat, C.; Camp, R.H.M.O.d.; Radoeva, T.; Schauer, S.E.; Fierens, J.; Jansen, K.; et al. A PARTHENOGENESIS Allele from Apomictic Dandelion Can Induce Egg Cell Division without Fertilization in Lettuce. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dahan, J.; Mireau, H. The Rf and Rf-like PPR in Higher Plants, a Fast-Evolving Subclass of PPR Genes. RNA Biol. 2013, 10, 1469–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gaborieau, L.; Brown, G.G.; Mireau, H. The Propensity of Pentatricopeptide Repeat Genes to Evolve into Restorers of Cytoplasmic Male Sterility. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 225677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jo, Y.D.; Ha, Y.; Lee, J.H.; Park, M.; Bergsma, A.C.; Choi, H.I.; Goritschnig, S.; Kloosterman, B.; van Dijk, P.J.; Choi, D.; et al. Fine Mapping of Restorer-of-Fertility in Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Identified a Candidate Gene Encoding a Pentatricopeptide Repeat (PPR)-Containing Protein. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 2003–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, Z.; Zou, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, L.; Wu, H.; Su, D.; Chen, Y.; Guo, J.; Luo, D.; et al. Cytoplasmic Male Sterility of Rice with Boro II Cytoplasm Is Caused by a Cytotoxic Peptide and Is Restored by Two Related PPR Motif Genes via Distinct Modes of MRNA Silencing. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Brown, G.G.; Formanová, N.; Jin, H.; Wargachuk, R.; Dendy, C.; Patil, P.; Laforest, M.; Zhang, J.; Cheung, W.Y.; Landry, B.S. The Radish Rfo Restorer Gene of Ogura Cytoplasmic Male Sterility Encodes a Protein with Multiple Pentatricopeptide Repeats. Plant J. 2003, 35, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Koizuka, N.; Imai, R.; Fujimoto, H.; Hayakawa, T.; Kimura, Y.; Kohno-Murase, J.; Sakai, T.; Kawasaki, S.; Imamura, J. Genetic Characterization of a Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein Gene, Orf687, That Restores Fertility in the Cytoplasmic Male-Sterile Kosena Radish. Plant J. 2003, 34, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Madugula, P.; Uttam, A.G.; Tonapi, V.A.; Ragimasalawada, M. Fine Mapping of Rf2, a Major Locus Controlling Pollen Fertility Restoration in Sorghum A1 Cytoplasm, Encodes a PPR Gene and Its Validation through Expression Analysis. Plant Breed. 2018, 137, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, D.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Hu, G.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, H.; Huang, Z. The Restorer Gene for Soybean M-Type Cytoplasmic Male Sterility, Rf-m, Is Located in a PPR Gene-Rich Region on Chromosome 16. Plant Breed. 2016, 135, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gao, B.; Ren, G.; Wen, T.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Lin, Z. A Super PPR Cluster for Restoring Fertility Revealed by Genetic Mapping, Homocap-Seq and de Novo Assembly in Cotton. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022, 135, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhang, B.; Zhang, X.; Guo, L.; Qi, T.; Wang, H.; Tang, H.; Qiao, X.; Shahzad, K.; Xing, C.; Wu, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of Rf-PPR-like (RFL) Genes and a New InDel Marker Development for Rf1 Gene in Cytoplasmic Male Sterile CMS-D2 Upland Cotton. J. Cotton Res. 2018, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, C.; Lezhneva, L.; Arnal, N.; Quadrado, M.; Mireau, H. The Radish Ogura Fertility Restorer Impedes Translation Elongation along Its Cognate CMS-Causing MRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2105274118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Liu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, K.; An, H.; Liu, J.; Yang, G.; Fu, T.; Yi, B.; Hong, D. A Mitochondria-Targeted PPR Protein Restores Pol Cytoplasmic Male Sterility by Reducing Orf224 Transcript Levels in Oilseed Rape. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1082–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tang, H.; Luo, D.; Zhou, D.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, D.; Zheng, X.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.-G. The Rice Restorer Rf4 for Wild-Abortive Cytoplasmic Male Sterility Encodes a Mitochondrial-Localized PPR Protein That Functions in Reduction of WA352 Transcripts. Mol. Plant 2014, 9, 1497–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Anisimova, I.N.; Alpatieva, N.V.; Karabitsina, Y.I.; Gavrilenko, T.A. Nucleotide Sequence Polymorphism in the RFL-PPR Genes of Potato. J. Genet. 2019, 98, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Phumichai, C.; Hosaka, K. Cryptic Improvement for Fertility by Continuous Selfing of Diploid Potatoes Using Sli Gene. Euphytica 2006, 149, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Peterson, B.A.; Holt, S.H.; Laimbeer, F.P.E.; Doulis, A.G.; Coombs, J.; Douches, D.S.; Hardigan, M.A.; Buell, C.R.; Veilleux, R.E. Self-Fertility in a Cultivated Diploid Potato Population Examined with the Infinium 8303 Potato Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array. Plant Genome 2016, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. De Jong, H.; Rowe, P.R. Inbreeding in Cultivated Diploid Potatoes. Potato Res. 1971, 14, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hutten, R.C.B.; Soppe, W.J.J.; Hermsen, J.G.T.; Jacobsen, E. Evaluation of Dihaploid Populations from Potato Varieties and Breeding Lines. Potato Res. 1995, 38, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Flowers of alal homozygous genotypes with A and T cytoplasm have anthers that produce pollen and set self-seed.
Figure 2. Flowers of alal homozygous genotypes with A and T cytoplasm have anthers that produce pollen and set self-seed.
Biology 13 00447 g002
Figure 3. Berry yield of antherless POC hybrids and male fertile controls in a field trial. Antherless hybrids (n = 26) produce significantly fewer berries than male fertile controls (n = 8) (p < 0.001). The boxes represent the 1st and 3rd quartiles, the horizontal lines in the box represent the medians, and the × represent the means.
Figure 3. Berry yield of antherless POC hybrids and male fertile controls in a field trial. Antherless hybrids (n = 26) produce significantly fewer berries than male fertile controls (n = 8) (p < 0.001). The boxes represent the 1st and 3rd quartiles, the horizontal lines in the box represent the medians, and the × represent the means.
Biology 13 00447 g003
Table 1. Segregation distortion in F2 populations with T and A cytoplasm.
Table 1. Segregation distortion in F2 populations with T and A cytoplasm.
PopulationAntherless Genotypeχ2p-Value
AlAlAlalalal
BC2F2(A)-13338618.950.00008
BC2F2(A)-2233478.250.01616
BC2F2(T)-6162183.040.21823
BC2F2(T)-11223100.20.90484
BC2F2(T)-2101990.050.97404
BC2F2(T)-311221101
BC2F2(T)-4831205.030.08071
BC2F2(T)-51453934.270.00001
Table 2. Fertility characteristics of eight self-fertile F2 genotypes and their genotype at the Al locus.
Table 2. Fertility characteristics of eight self-fertile F2 genotypes and their genotype at the Al locus.
GenotypeCytoplasm Type# Observed FlowersAnther Phenotype (0–3)Pollen Shed (0–3)# Self-Berries# Spontaneous Berries# SeedsAntherless GenotypeF3 Population
BC2F2(A)-1-29A20335223alalBC2F3(A)-1
BC2F2(A)-2-44A112230305alalBC2F3(A)-2
BC2F2(T)-2-07T233121106AlalBC2F3(T)-1
BC2F2(T)-2-20T253352220AlalBC2F3(T)-2
BC2F2(T)-3-06T6313097AlalBC2F3(T)-3
BC2F2(T)-4-16T30331016140alalBC2F3(T)-4
BC2F2(T)-4-17T1423206Alal
BC2F2(T)-6-02T2721219AlalBC2F3(T)-5
Table 3. Flowering, berry and seed set of tuber-grown BC2F2 genotypes.
Table 3. Flowering, berry and seed set of tuber-grown BC2F2 genotypes.
GenotypeCytoplasm TypeAntherless Genotype# FlowersAnther PhenotypePollen Shed (0–3)# Selfings# Berries# SeedsPollen Viability
BC2F2(A)-1-29-C1Aalal1131-26412960.9
BC2F2(A)-1-29-C2Aalal731421350.9
BC2F2(A)-1-29-C3Aalal173141220.9
BC2F2(A)-1-29-C4Aalal931-23340.9
BC2F2(A)-1-29-C5Aalal1131-211490.9
BC2F2(A)-2-09-C1Aalal172-31626120.8
BC2F2(A)-2-09-C2Aalal0N.DN.D0N.DN.DN.D
BC2F2(A)-2-09-C3Aalal33111310.8
BC2F2(A)-2-09-C4Aalal72-31-222500.8
BC2F2(A)-2-09-C5Aalal112-3111230.8
BC2F2(A)-2-39-C1Aalal4200N.DN.DN.D.
BC2F2(A)-2-39-C2Aalal3200N.DN.DN.D.
BC2F2(A)-2-39-C3Aalal0N.DN.D0N.DN.DN.D.
BC2F2(A)-2-39-C4Aalal1200N.DN.DN.D.
BC2F2(A)-2-39-C5Aalal0N.DN.D0N.DN.DN.D.
BC2F2(A)-2-44-C1Aalal322-3317197400.9
BC2F2(A)-2-44-C2Aalal322-33242824570.9
BC2F2(A)-2-44-C3Aalal112-33102323200.9
BC2F2(A)-2-44-C4Aalal152-3312197190.9
BC2F2(A)-2-44-C5Aalal242-33133412460.9
BC2F2(T)-3-07-C1Talal17314218N.D.
BC2F2(T)-3-07-C2Talal20316340N.D.
BC2F2(T)-3-07-C3Talal2430-1323N.D.
BC2F2(T)-3-07-C4Talal3330-18482N.D.
BC2F2(T)-3-07-C5Talal3830-18775N.D.
BC2F2(T)-4-16-C1Talal523316215500.9
BC2F2(T)-4-16-C2Talal473317219060.9
BC2F2(T)-4-16-C3Talal40331071770.9
BC2F2(T)-4-16-C4Talal443314101990.9
BC2F2(T)-4-16-C5Talal433320378430.9
Table 4. Flowering, berry and seed set of TPS-grown BC2F3 genotypes.
Table 4. Flowering, berry and seed set of TPS-grown BC2F3 genotypes.
GenotypeParentCytoplasm TypeAntherless Genotype# FlowersAnther Phenotype (0–3)Pollen Shed (0–3)# Selfings# Berries# SeedsPollen Viability
BC2F3(A)-1-11BC2F2(A)-1-29Aalal21315515N.D.
BC2F3(A)-1-12BC2F2(A)-1-29Aalal12339348N.D.
BC2F3(A)-2-04BC2F2(A)-2-44Aalal92271498N.D.
BC2F3(A)-2-05BC2F2(A)-2-44Aalal22321125N.D.
BC2F3(A)-2-14BC2F2(A)-2-44Aalal5235324285%
BC2F3(A)-2-17BC2F2(A)-2-44Aalal72371027890%
BC2F3(T)-2-06BC2F2(T)-2-20TAlAl533548360%
BC2F3(T)-2-09BC2F2(T)-2-20TAlal932-3853070%
BC2F3(T)-2-24BC2F2(T)-2-20TAlal1332-3181133670%
BC2F3(T)-3-27BC2F2(T)-3-06TAlal22231812151490%
BC2F3(T)-3-29BC2F2(T)-3-06TAlal4531-2222170790%
BC2F3(T)-4-01BC2F2(T)-4-16Talal352-32-324105585%
BC2F3(T)-4-07BC2F2(T)-4-16Talal3232-31911060%
BC2F3(T)-4-13BC2F2(T)-4-16Talal1533242112270%
BC2F3(T)-4-25BC2F2(T)-4-16Talal1731-27105960%
BC2F3(T)-4-31BC2F2(T)-4-16Talal4932231169N.D.
BC2F3(T)-5-02BC2F2(T)-4-16Talal2233191329790%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eggers, E.-J.; Su, Y.; van der Poel, E.; Flipsen, M.; de Vries, M.E.; Bachem, C.W.B.; Visser, R.G.F.; Lindhout, P. Identification, Elucidation and Deployment of a Cytoplasmic Male Sterility System for Hybrid Potato. Biology 2024, 13, 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060447

AMA Style

Eggers E-J, Su Y, van der Poel E, Flipsen M, de Vries ME, Bachem CWB, Visser RGF, Lindhout P. Identification, Elucidation and Deployment of a Cytoplasmic Male Sterility System for Hybrid Potato. Biology. 2024; 13(6):447. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eggers, Ernst-Jan, Ying Su, Esmee van der Poel, Martijn Flipsen, Michiel E. de Vries, Christian W. B. Bachem, Richard G. F. Visser, and Pim Lindhout. 2024. "Identification, Elucidation and Deployment of a Cytoplasmic Male Sterility System for Hybrid Potato" Biology 13, no. 6: 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060447

APA Style

Eggers, E. -J., Su, Y., van der Poel, E., Flipsen, M., de Vries, M. E., Bachem, C. W. B., Visser, R. G. F., & Lindhout, P. (2024). Identification, Elucidation and Deployment of a Cytoplasmic Male Sterility System for Hybrid Potato. Biology, 13(6), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop