Next Article in Journal
For a Colorful Life: Recent Advances in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis during Leaf Senescence
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Combined Live Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Bacillus Cereus Tablets on the Structure and Function of the Intestinal Flora in Rabbits Undergoing Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities of Essential Oil from Satureja montana L., a Medicinal Plant Grown under the Influence of Fertilization and Planting Dates

by
Hussein A. H. Said-Al Ahl
1,*,
Miroslava Kačániova
2,3,*,
Abeer A. Mahmoud
4,
Wafaa M. Hikal
5,
Natália Čmiková
2,
Małgorzata Szczepanek
6,
Karolina Błaszczyk
6,
Siham M. Al-Balawi
5,
Alessandro Bianchi
7,
Slim Smaoui
8 and
Kirill G. Tkachenko
9
1
Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Department, Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries Research Institute, National Research Centre (NRC), 33 El-Behouth St. Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt
2
Institute of Horticulture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia
3
School of Medical & Health Sciences, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw, Okopowa 59, 01-043 Warszawa, Poland
4
Department of Botany (Plant Physiology Section), Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
5
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Agronomy, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
7
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy
8
Laboratory of Microbial Biotechnology and Engineering Enzymes (LMBEE), Center of Biotechnology of Sfax (CBS), University of Sfax-Tunisia, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
9
Peter the Great Botanical Garden of the V.L. Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 197376, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(5), 328; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13050328
Submission received: 13 April 2024 / Revised: 5 May 2024 / Accepted: 7 May 2024 / Published: 8 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Concerted efforts by scientists and researchers are still being made to ensure the medicinal plants will be available on a continuing basis as a result of their medicinal, pharmaceutical, food, and other uses and to meet the increasing demands for them globally. Satureja montana is one of the multi-use medicinal plants that was introduced to Egypt to study the effect of planting dates, nitrogen, phosphorus, and fertilizers, and their interaction on the production of fresh herb and essential oil. Planting in the autumn gave the highest fresh herb, with 55 kg of nitrogen/ha and 37 kg of phosphorus/ha fertilization. For the highest essential oil production, spring planting with 55 kg of nitrogen/ha and 74 kg of phosphorus/ha was used. Much of the knowledge on its use as raw material in traditional medicine has been reported. Also, this study’s emphasis has been put on essential oil composition. This study highlights that the cultivated species belongs to S. montana L., a carvacrol chemotype. There is antioxidant, antimicrobial, and insecticidal activities shown by S. montana essential oil. Due to the limited information recorded about the influence of different agronomic factors on the plant, there needs to be agronomic studies conducted on S. montana, and a selection of the best ones in order to maximize its production.

Abstract

The rising demand for safe plant compounds and herbal products that contribute positively to human health is in line with current market trends. Plants belonging to the Satureja genus, particularly the aromatic medicinal S. montana L. from the Lamiaceae family, are well suited to these trends as they serve as pharmaceutical raw materials. This research aimed to assess the influence of sowing date and fertilization doses, as well as their interaction, on the fresh weight, essential oil content, and composition of S. montana. Experimental cultivation involved varying nitrogen and phosphorus levels. The second cut had the highest fresh weight and oil production compared to the first cut. The highest total plant biomass was achieved with autumn sowing and fertilization at 55 kg N/ha and 37 kg P/ha, whereas Spring sowing exhibited higher essential oil production, with the maximum oil % with 74 kg P/ha and oil yield after applying 55 kg N/ha and 74 kg P/ha. The GC-MS analysis revealed that carvacrol was the predominant compound, with it being recommended to grow S. montana in Spring at doses of 55 kg N/ha and 74 kg P/ha for the superior oil yield. Additionally, S. montana essential oil demonstrated notable biological and antimicrobial activity, positioning it as a potential alternative to chemical food preservatives.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Winter savory (Satureja montana) is a medicinal herb belonging to the Lamiaceae family, predominantly found in the Mediterranean region of Southern Europe and Northern Africa, with a presence in other global regions [1,2,3]. Highly regarded for its pharmacological activity, S. montana serves a multitude of purposes. It not only functions as a culinary herb, but also contributes to perfumery and serves as an active ingredient in medical preparations. Traditional medicine extensively utilizes S. montana for treating various conditions, including respiratory system inflammation, antiseptic needs, carminative properties, digestive aid, expectorant stimulation, gastrointestinal support, and antidiarrheic effects [4]. The prominence of essential oil in S. montana underscores its biological significance, driving demand for this herb in therapeutic, pharmaceutical, and industrial applications. Essential oils, especially those obtained from natural sources, have attracted growing attention from researchers due to their multifaceted benefits. The essential oil of S. montana stands out for its rich phytochemical composition, featuring compounds like carvacrol, thymol, β-caryophyllene, γ-terpinene, p-cymene, and linalool. These constituents provide potent antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antioxidant, anti-catarrhal, antitumor, antidiarrheal, stimulant, and expectorant properties, establishing. S. montana as a valuable resource for various health-related and industrial purposes [1,5,6,7].
The biomass and essential oil productivity of plants, as well as the composition of their essential oils, are significantly influenced by factors such as plant origin, species, environmental conditions, agronomic practices, climate, soil, harvesting period, plant part, post-harvest management, and isolation procedures [8,9]. These variables play a crucial role in shaping the plant’s biosynthetic pathways, thereby impacting the relative proportions of essential oil constituents. Achieving optimal cultivation conditions for S. montana is essential to ensure the production of high-quality raw material suitable for pharmaceutical purposes.
Fertilization affects plant growth and total biomass accumulation, as well as the efficiency of accumulating key bioactive compounds such as essential oils and their composition [10]. Nitrogen is widely acknowledged as the primary building block of protein and has a significant impact on plant growth. Studies have shown that nitrogen fertilizers not only increase biomass and protein accumulation, but also influence the quantity and quality of key bioactive compounds including essential oils [11,12]. Phosphorus is a crucial macronutrient involved in numerous biochemical processes that impact plant yield components [13]. In addition, it plays a key role in the metabolism of secondary compounds in plants [10,14]. While the effects of macronutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus on key herbaceous traits are well understood, less attention has been given to the effects of fertilization with each element individually or in combination, as well as the dosages, on S. montana production.
Studies have demonstrated the significant impact of planting dates on plant growth, biomass production, and essential oil yield. Weather conditions, particularly temperature, play a crucial role in plant growth and yield by influencing metabolic activities such as photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration. Variations in herb and essential oil yields have been linked to changes in photosynthetic activities [15]. Consequently, harvest timing has received considerable attention as an important agronomic trait due to its effect on herb and oil yields, as well as essential oil composition [11,16].
S. montana is recognized as a promising industrial crop, particularly as it emerges as a newly cultivated medicinal plant in Egypt. Therefore, there is a scarcity of research on S. montana in Egypt. The optimal agrotechnical factors for S. montana and their influence on the productivity of fresh herb and essential oil have not been extensively studied. With no available data on planting dates and its important role in plant productivity, as well as its effect on essential oil of the S. montana, they have not been studied before. Moreover, there is no information concerning its nutrient requirements in Egypt; only one study conducted by Said-Al Ahl and Hussien [4] reported the positive effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on the yield of dry herb and essential oil. The aim of this study is to determine appropriate production strategies for the S. montana carvacrol chemotype to effectively manage supply and demand in the global markets for carvacrol-bearing essential oils. However, further studies are needed to fully address this objective.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of various nitrogen and phosphorus doses, both individually and in combination, along with different planting dates, on the fresh herb biomass, essential oil yield, and its composition in S. montana. An innovative aspect of this research was the exploration of the combined impact of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization with optimal planting dates (autumn and spring) to enhance S. montana productivity under Egyptian conditions, which represents a novel area of investigation for S. montana plants. Additionally, the study investigated the in vitro and in situ antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and insecticidal activities of the essential oil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

This research was conducted at the experimental farm of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, located in Giza governorate, Egypt. Prior to sowing, the soil’s physical and chemical characteristics were assessed following the method outlined by Jackson [17]. The soil was classified as sandy loam, with the following physical composition: 51.1% sand, 25% silt, 23.9% clay, and 0.47% organic matter. The soil’s chemical properties were determined as follows: Electrical Conductivity (E.C) = 4.3 ds/m, pH = 7.85, and total nitrogen (N), available phosphorus (P), and exchangeable potassium (K) content were 0.07, 0.53, and 2.8 mg/kg, respectively [17].

2.2. Plant Materials and Experimental Design

Satureja montana seeds, sourced from HEM ZADEN B.V (Venhuizen, Netherlands) underwent nursery sowing on 15 October and 15 March for winter and summer planting, respectively, across two consecutive growing seasons. Following a two-month period in the nursery, uniform seedlings were transplanted into the field on 15 December (autumn sowing) and 15 May (spring sowing) in both seasons into 3 × 3.5 m plots on rows with 60 cm apart and 20 cm between seedlings; the seedlings were thinned 30 days after being transplanted to leave one plant per hill to give 85 plants/plot. The seedlings were irrigated, and the soil was kept moist. The study employed a factorial design, implemented in a complete randomized block with three replications. Phosphorus treatments ((P0) = 0, (P1) = 37, and (P2) = 74 kg P/ha, as calcium superphosphate (P2O5, 15.5%)), were applied prior to transplanting on both sowing dates. Nitrogen application, as a dressing application ((N0) = 0, (N1) = 55, and (N2) = 110 kg N/ha, as urea (46% N), was divided into two equal portions at 30 and 45 days from transplanting. The fertilizer treatments are T1(N0P0), T2(N55P0), T3(N110P0), T4(N0P37), T5(N0P74), T6(N55P37), T7(N55P74), T8(N110P37), and T9(N110P74). All other recommended agricultural practices were uniformly applied during the period of the experiments.

2.3. Measurement of Fresh Weight and Oil Yield

On July 15 and September 15 of both seasons, plant harvesting occurred, and the fresh herb was weighed (g/plant). Essential oil extraction from the fresh herb was determined by hydro-distillation for 3 h of each experimental unit according to Guenther [18]. Essential oil content (%) was quantified as ml per 100 g of fresh herb, and essential oil yield was expressed as ml per plant by multiplying the oil content (%) by the average yield per plant of fresh herb. For each experimental unit, three internal replications were hydro-distilled and their average was used for statistical analysis. The collected essential oils underwent dehydration over anhydrous sodium sulfate and were stored in a refrigerator until subjected to GC-MS analyses.

2.4. GC-MS Analyses and Identification of Components

The GC-MS analysis was performed using a TRACE GC Ultra Gas Chromatograph (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a THERMO mass spectrometer detector (ISQ Single Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A TGWAX MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness) was employed in the GC/MS system. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min with a split ratio of 1:10. The temperature program was composed of an initial 1 min at 40 °C, followed by a ramping at 4.0 °C/min to 160 °C (held for 6 min), and then a further increase at 6.0 °C/min to 210 °C (held for 1 min). Both the injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 210 °C. Diluted samples (1:10 hexane, v/v) of 0.2 μL were consistently injected. Mass spectra, obtained via electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV in the m/z range of 40–450, were used for compound identification, utilizing authentic chemicals, the Wiley spectral library collection, and the NIST library [19,20].

2.5. Antioxidant Potential

This method was adapted from a previous study [21]. The antioxidant activity of essential oil was assessed using the method of radical scavenging with 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, Sigma Aldrich, Germany). A solution of DPPH (0.025 g/L dissolved in methanol) was adjusted to an absorbance of 0.7 at a wavelength of 515 nm. In a 96-well microplate, 5 μL of essential oil sample was added to 195 μL of DPPH solution, and the reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min in the dark with continuous shaking at 1000 rpm. The antioxidant activity was quantified as the percentage of DPPH inhibition using the formula (A0 − AA)/A0 × 100, where A0 represents the absorbance of DPPH and AA represents the absorbance of the sample. To standardize the results, antioxidant activity was compared to a standard reference, Trolox (Sigma Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany), dissolved in methanol (Uvasol® for spectroscopy, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) within a concentration range of 0–100 µg/mL.

2.6. Antimicrobial Assay

2.6.1. Tested Microorganisms

The essential oil’s antimicrobial effectiveness was assessed against various strains of bacteria and yeast. Gram-positive bacteria included Micrococcus luteus CCM 732, Listeria monocytogenes CCM 4699, and Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus CCM 3953, while Gram-negative bacteria included Escherichia coli CCM 3953, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica CCM 3807, and Yersinia enterocolitica CCM 7204T. Yeast strains included Candida albicans CCM 8186, C. glabrata CCM 8270, C. krusei CCM 8271, and C. tropicalis CCM 8223. All microbial strains were obtained from the Czech Collection of Microorganisms in Brno, Czech Republic. Prior to analysis, bacterial and yeast cultures were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 25 °C in Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), respectively. The bacterial and yeast inoculum’s optical density was standardized to 0.5 McFarland standard on the day of the experiment [22].

2.6.2. Disk Diffusion Method

The disc diffusion sensitivity test used the same method as in a previous study [22]. The antimicrobial activity of the microorganisms listed in Section 2.6.1 was evaluated. Mueller–Hinton Agar (MHA) and Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) were utilized for culturing bacterial and yeast strains, respectively. Discs impregnated with S. montana essential oil were placed on the agar surface. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C for bacteria and 25 °C for yeast, the inhibition zones were measured. Positive controls (gentamicin, cefoxitin, and fluconazole) were included, and each experiment was conducted in triplicate [22].

2.6.3. Minimal Inhibition Concentration

The determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC50 and MIC90) values followed the methodology by Kačániová et al. [23]. A 96-well microtiter plate was filled with 50 μL of microbial inoculum, and S. montana essential oil was added at various concentrations in Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB). Negative and positive control wells were established, and plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C for bacteria and 25 °C for yeast. Absorbance at 570 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer (Glomax, Promega Inc., Madison, WI, USA). MIC50 and MIC90 values, representing the concentrations inhibiting 50% and 90% of bacterial growth, respectively, were determined. The procedure was repeated three times for reliability [23].

2.6.4. In Situ Analyses on the Vegetable

In this study, we investigated the antibacterial properties of S. montana essential oil in the vapor phase and its ability to inhibit the growth of yeasts and bacteria. To ensure proper sealing, we applied MHA and SDA to both the lid and the bottom of Petri dishes. The kohlrabi (fresh bought from a regular supermarket) was cut into 0.5 mm rounds and served as a food model, rinsed three times in distilled water. Using disposable bacterial eyelets, selected bacteria were introduced into the kohlrabi, and yeasts were cultured on MHA and SDA. To assess S. montana essential oil’s effects, filter paper was cut to fit the diameter (60 mm) of the Petri dish lid, and 100 μL of different S. montana essential oil concentrations (diluted in ethyl acetate to achieve 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 μg/mL) were pipetted onto the paper [24]. The control group received ethyl acetate treatment. The Petri dishes containing yeast and bacteria were then incubated at 25 °C and 37 °C for seven days in a dark, hermetically sealed environment. Three replicates were performed for each measurement. Using stereological analysis, we determined the inhibition of microorganism growth. We employed ImageJ software 1.50i (The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) to calculate the volumetric density (Vv) of the microbes. The stereological network points for the colony (P) and substrate (p) were counted. The microorganism’s growth density was calculated as a percentage using the formula Vv = P/p × 100. The growth inhibition of microorganisms (MGI) as a percentage was used to express the S. montana essential oil’s antimicrobial activity in vapor form, calculated as MGI = [(C − T)/C] × 100, where C represents the growth density of microorganisms in the control group and T represents the growth density of microorganisms in the treated group.

2.7. Biofilm Development Study

Crystal Violet Assay

The assessment of Minimal Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration (MBIC) followed the methodology outlined by Kačániová et al. [23]. Bacterial suspensions were incubated in Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) for 24 h at 37 °C in an aerobic environment. An inoculum with an optical density of 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared, and a microtiter plate with 96 wells was utilized. Each well received 50 μL of the prepared inoculum and 100 μL of MHB, with the first column of the microplate receiving 100 μL of the essential oil. A two-fold dilution resulted in concentrations from 100 mg/mL to 0.049 mg/mL. Maximal growth control used MHB with a bacterial inoculum, while MHB with essential oil served as the negative control. After a 24 h incubation period at 37 °C, the absorbance was measured at 570 nm using the Glomax spectrophotometer (Promega Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The MBIC, defined as the concentration at which the absorbance equaled or was less than the negative control, was determined. The concentrations inhibiting 50% and 90% of biofilm development were designated as MBIC50 and MBIC90. This process was repeated for validation [23].

2.8. Insecticidal Activity

Harmonia axyridis was employed as the model organism for assessing S. montana essential oil insecticidal activity. Groups of 100 individuals were exposed to various S. montana essential oil concentrations (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, and 3.125%) on filter paper in Petri dishes. After 24 h, living and deceased individuals were counted. The experiment was conducted in triplicate to validate results [22].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The acquired data underwent analysis involving mean and standard deviation. Normal distribution was confirmed through the Shapiro–Wilk test. Multi-variate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was employed to scrutinize fresh weight (g), oil content per 100 g of fresh weight (mL/100 g FW), and oil yield per plant (mL/plant). The study explored the impact of N and P fertilization, sowing date, and their interactions. Tuckey’s HSD test assessed mean differences at a significance level of p = 0.05. Statistical calculations utilized the Statistical 13.0 PL package (Stat soft, Poland). Graphs illustrating the fresh weight, oil content (mL/100 g FW), and oil yield (mL/plant) of S. montana, encompassing the first and second cuts, were generated using Grapher 21 (Golden Software, Golden, CO, USA). For antimicrobial activity assessments, conducted in triplicate, mean values ± standard deviation (SD) was reported. One-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05 significance, was performed using CoStat version 6.3 (Cohort software, Santa USA).

3. Results

3.1. Fresh Weight

Our study confirmed the impact of sowing date (p < 0.001), fertilization doses (p < 0.001), and their interaction (p < 0.001) on the fresh weight of S. montana plants during the first and second cuts (Supplementary Materials, Table S1; Table 1). Specifically, S. montana sown in autumn exhibited a significant increase in herb fresh weight compared to those sown in spring in both cuts. S. montana fresh weight was increased with increasing fertilization doses of nitrogen and/or phosphorus. In general, plants fertilized with 55 kg N/ha and 37 kg P/ha gave higher herb fresh weight compared to other doses. The maximum plant weight in the first cut was achieved with fertilization doses of 55 kg N/ha and 37 kg P/ha (Table 1). In the second cut, 55 kg N/ha and 37 kg P/ha and 55 kg N/ha and 74 kg P/ha gave a higher fresh weight.
Regarding the interaction treatments between planting dates and fertilization doses, the interaction treatments showed a significant clear effect on herb fresh weight compared to unfertilized plants. Plants sowing in autumn and fertilized with 55 kg N/ha and 37 kg P/ha gave the maximum values (245.4 and 405.6 g per plant) during the first and second cuts, respectively. As a result of our findings, we recommend that planting S. montana plants in autumn and fertilizing with 55 kg N/ha and 37 kg P/ha to obtain the highest fresh herb productivity (Figure 1).

3.2. Essential Oil Content

The results about essential oil content indicate a significant influence of sowing date (p < 0.001), fertilization doses (p < 0.001), and their interaction (p < 0.001) on the essential oil content (%) of S. montana plants (Supplementary Materials, Table S1; Table 2).
Our investigations demonstrated that the oil content (mL/100 g FW) in S. montana plants was significantly higher in spring sowing than in autumn sowing in the first and second cuts (Table 2). S. montana essential oil was increased with increasing fertilization doses of nitrogen and/or phosphorus. Phosphorus fertilization showed the most significant impact on increasing the oil content compared to nitrogen fertilization alone or in combination with phosphorus. As the phosphorus fertilization doses increased, so did the essential oil content. Interestingly, it was observed that fertilizing with nitrogen at 55 kg/ha resulted in a higher oil percentage compared to the higher dose of 110 kg/ha. Moreover, the oil content in plants was higher during the second cut compared to the first cut. It is worth noting that the oil content in plants, during both the first and second cuts for both autumn and spring sowings, was lowest in the treatment without fertilization.
Regarding the interaction treatments between planting dates and fertilization doses, the interaction treatments showed a significant clear effect on essential oil compared to unfertilized plants. Plants sowing in spring and fertilized with 74 kg P/ha only gave the maximum values (0.438 and 0.458 mL/100 g FW) during the first and second cuts, respectively. The maximum essential oil content was achieved by sowing in spring with phosphorus fertilization at 74 kg/ha during the second cut.

3.3. Essential Oil Yield

The effect of sowing date, fertilization doses, and their interaction on the oil yield of S. montana was also found to be significant (Supplementary Material, Table S1). Essential oil yield of S. montana was higher in the second cut compared to the first cut (Table 3). A significant increase in oil yield was found when S. montana was planted in the autumn compared to when it was planted in the spring during the first cut. On the other hand, there is a conflict during the second cut, i.e., there was a significant increase in oil yield in plants planted through spring compared to autumn planting.
There was a difference in the oil yield with respect to the fertilization treatments. It was found that, plants fertilized with 55 kg N/ha and 74 kg P/ha, gave the highest oil yield (0.729 and 1.426 mL per plant FW) in the first and second cuts, respectively. By increasing the fertilization doses of nitrogen and/or phosphorus, the oil yield increased. Control lants that were not fertilized gave the lowest values in both cuts.
Regarding the interaction treatments between planting dates and fertilization doses, the interaction treatments showed a significant difference in essential oil yield for most treatments. Plants sowing in spring and fertilized with 55 kg N/ha and 74 kg P/ha gave the maximum values (0.762 and 1.553 mL per plant FW) during the first and second cuts, respectively. It is also clear from Figure 2 that the highest essential oil yield (1.553 mL per plant FW) was obtained from sowing S. montana in the spring and fertilization with 55 kg n/ha and 74 kg p/ha in the second cut.

3.4. Essential Oil Composition

The detailed composition of essential oil isolated from S. montana in our study is provided in tables (Table 4, Tables S2 and S3). The analysis reveals that the essential oil extracted from fresh S. montana herb predominantly contains carvacrol as its major compound, constituting over 10% of the oil. Additionally, there are five minor compounds, including thymol, p-cymene, γ-terpinene, β-caryophyllene, and linalool, each with concentrations exceeding 1% but less than 10% (Table 4). Compounds with concentrations less than 1% are traces, as shown in Table S2. It is also clearly shown that four main chemical groups can be distinguished based on their chemical properties: monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, and oxygenated sesquiterpenes. Oxygenated monoterpenes and monoterpene hydrocarbons constitute the largest share, ranging from 69.84% to 84.71% and 8.97% to 19.98% for both autumn and spring sowings (Table S3).
Carvacrol was found to be the most abundant compound in S. montana during both autumn and spring sowings, followed by thymol, another significant oxygenated monoterpene. Linalool ranked third among the terpenes identified (Table 4). Monoterpene hydrocarbons, including p-cymene and γ-terpinene, were the most abundant in plants sown both in October and March (Table 4). Additionally, our study identified β-caryophyllene, a sesquiterpene hydrocarbon, as an important compound (Table 4).
However, the applications of N, P, and their interaction fertilizers appeared to exert a more pronounced influence on the essential oil composition, especially in the case of high concentration compounds like carvacrol, p-cymene, γ-terpinene, and thymol (Table 4). Although phosphate fertilization had greater effect than nitrogen, while the interaction treatments between nitrogen and phosphorus had the highest effect, and accordingly the application of the highest dosages of N and P (110 and 74 kg/ha, respectively) resulted in the greatest quantity of carvacrol (77.35%, 76.67%) and thymol (5.87%, 4.76%) during autumn and spring planting dates, respectively. The control plants contained the lowest amount of carvacrol (65.32%, 65.41%) and thymol (2.56%, 1.97%) during autumn and spring planting dates, respectively. Conversely, linalool and the most significant monoterpene hydrocarbons, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene have the opposite behavior, with its highest concentration observed in control plants (without fertilization) and the lowest concentration was obtained from the highest dosages of N and P (110 and 74 kg/ha) compared to the control plants (Table 4). For β-caryophyllene, there was no specific effect for fertilizer on its content.
According to Table 4 and Table S3, the total percentage of oxygenated compounds exceeded that of non-oxygenated compounds, and this ratio varied depending on the applied parameters. The highest proportion of oxygenated compounds (94.13%) was observed in the essential oils of plants fertilized with N110 + P74 kg/ha, while the lowest proportion (86.67%) was found in the essential oils of non-fertilized plants (control). This trend was consistent with the distribution of carvacrol. It was noted that between 86.67% and 94.13% of the identified compounds were monoterpenes, with the remaining compounds being sesquiterpenes, the proportions of which varied according to the treatments applied.

3.5. Antioxidant Activity

The assessment of the antioxidant potential of S. montana essential oil relied on its ability to counteract the stable cation DPPH radical. The findings revealed a significant inhibition of 69.37% by S. montana essential oil against the DPPH radical.

3.6. Antimicrobial Activity

This study investigated the inhibitory effects of S. montana essential oil on the growth of different bacterial and fungal strains, employing disc diffusion and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods. Interestingly, among Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus displayed the highest level of resistance, while L. monocytogenes showed the greatest susceptibility. Among the Gram-negative bacterial strains, E. coli demonstrated the greatest resistance, while S. enterica and Y. enterocolitica showed heightened sensitivity. Additionally, the study unveiled significant antimicrobial activity of S. montana essential oil against the yeast strain C. krusei, as outlined in Table 5.
After obtaining the results from the disk diffusion method, further investigation of the antibacterial properties of S. montana essential oil was carried out using microdiffusion experiments. The results, including the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC50 and MIC90), are shown in Table 6. Among Gram-positive bacterial strains, S. aureus showed the lowest MIC50 (2.19 mg/mL) and MIC90 (2.35 mg/mL) values, while M. luteus exhibited the highest MIC50 and MIC90 values. In Gram-negative bacteria, Y. enterocolitica was the most sensitive strain, with an MIC50 of 18.43 mg/mL and an MIC90 of 18.65 mg/mL, while E. coli displayed the highest resistance, with an MIC50 of 13.16 mg/mL and an MIC90 of 13.37 mg/mL. Yeasts demonstrated varying MIC against C. albicans (MIC50 of 22.18 mg/mL and MIC90 of 22.35 mg/mL) and C. glabrata (MIC50 of 23.43 mg/mL and MIC90 of 23.74 mg/mL). Gram-positive bacteria exhibited higher sensitivity to S. montana essential oil, with an MIC50 range of 2.19 to 3.34 mg/mL, compared to Gram-negative bacteria, which showed a higher range of 13.16 to 18.43 mg/mL. The study indicated that very low concentrations of the essential oil effectively inhibited all tested strains, showcasing strong antibacterial activity.
S. montana essential oil exhibited significant antibiofilm activity against S. enterica, with a MBIC50 of 4.56 mg/mL and a MBIC90 of 4.79 μg/mL, as determined through the crystal violet technique (Table 6). The effectiveness of S. montana essential oil in preventing biofilm formation or eliminating preexisting biofilm by strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes was assessed using the crystal violet staining method. Specifically, concentrations of 1/4 and 1/8 MIC of S. montana essential oil were employed to evaluate the impact of S. montana essential oil on bacterial biofilm formation activity. Increased concentrations of the essential oil led to a notable decrease in biofilm formation across all strains examined. Particularly, the L. monocytogenes strain displayed a dose-dependent decrease, suggesting that higher concentrations of S. montana essential oil were linked to a corresponding reduction in biofilm formation.
Our study aimed to explore the effectiveness of S. montana essential oil in the vapor phase. Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and yeast bacteria were cultivated on kohlrabi to assess the impact of S. montana essential oil, as outlined in Table 7. In a kohlrabi model contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria, the most effective concentration of S. montana essential oil against S. aureus (86.46%) was observed at a concentration of 62.5 µg/mL. Additionally, in the vapor phase against the Gram-negative bacterial strain, 62.5 µg/mL was identified as the most effective concentration in inhibiting the growth of Y. enterocolitica (96.37%). For C. albicans and C. krusei in the kohlrabi model, S. montana essential oil exhibited maximum efficacy at a concentration of 62.5 µg/mL, achieving inhibition rates of 76.56% and 76.43%, respectively.
The insecticidal activity of S. montana essential oil against H. axyridis was evaluated, and the results are presented in Table 8. The data indicate that the highest insecticidal activity of the assessed essential oil was observed at concentrations of 50% and 100%. However, at concentrations of 6.25% and 3.15%, S. montana essential oil did not exhibit significant repellent properties against H. axyridis.

4. Discussion

Fertilization plays a crucial role in providing the necessary elements for plant growth and development. Ninou et al. [25] reported that nitrogen fertilizer increased plant growth and biomass production of Greek oregano. Further studies on S. hortensis have corroborated the beneficial effects of nitrogen fertilization, leading to a notable enhancement in plant growth and overall herbage yield [26,27]. This stimulation, as reported by Abd-Allah et al. [28], is achieved through the activation of photosynthetic pigments and enzymatic reactions within the plant. Nitrogen plays a crucial role in plant biology, as it contributes to the synthesis of essential compounds such as nucleic acids, proteins, phytohormones, and chlorophyll. These substances are vital for various cellular processes, including growth and biomass production. Additionally, nitrogen facilitates proton and electron transport during photosynthesis and respiration, which are fundamental metabolic processes in plants. Moreover, it is involved in signaling pathways that enable communication between different organs within the plant [29,30]. Also, an adequate nitrogen source is essential for increasing in phosphorus uptake may be attributed to rhizosphere acidification [31] or the mobilization of soil phosphorus, enhancing phosphorus uptake efficiency by the roots [32]. Lima et al. [33], in their study on Ocimum kilimandscharicum plants, reported that plant growth and yield were positively influenced by phosphorus addition. Phosphorus is essential for plant growth and development, serving as a critical component of the plant nucleus and protoplast. It plays a vital role in the formation of nucleic acids and phosphoesters, which are essential for various cellular processes. Additionally, phosphorus is involved in the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which serves as an energy currency for the plant. Furthermore, phosphorus supports root development, promotes flower bud differentiation, and facilitates flowering, contributing to overall plant health and reproductive success [29]. Additionally, morphological characteristics and mass production exhibited significant increases with higher P doses [34,35,36,37]. On Satureja khuzestanica, Nooshkam et al. [38] observed that the dry weight increased with the application of (50 N and 30 P kg/ha) or (100 and 60 kg/ha). Previous studies reported that nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization, alone or in combination, has a positive effect on morphological parameters and herb productivity [34,35,36].
Overall, there is a lack of research addressing the impact of planting dates, as well as nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization, on the productivity of S. montana or other Satureja species. Specifically, there have been no prior studies investigating the influence of autumn and spring planting dates on S. montana. This highlights the novelty and importance of the current research in expanding our understanding of the optimal cultivation practices for S. montana. A study conducted on S. sahendica revealed that the choice of sowing dates, whether in autumn or spring, had a significant impact on various plant attributes, including the number of tillers, plant height, the quantity of lateral branches on the main stem, and the yield of individual plant shoots [39]. Notably, autumn planting out-performed spring sowing in all the mentioned traits. Similarly, research conducted by Righini et al. [40] on Camelina sativa emphasized the advantages of autumn sowing dates, correlating them with increased plant aboveground biomass.
The limited available information highlights the need for further exploration into the fertilization practices for optimal cultivation of Satureja plants. Sahzabi et al. [41] conducted a study on summer savory, showing that the application of soil nitrogen effectively promotes plant growth, resulting in higher shoot yield. Additionally, the application of 100 kg/ha phosphorus was found to increase the fresh weight yield compared to control plants [42]. The application of phosphorus fertilizer, as observed by Said-Al Ahl and Abdou [10] significantly influenced the growth parameters of dragonhead. Alharbi et al. [13] demonstrated that phosphorus application led to increased fresh biomass in parsley cultivars. Additionally, research by Mehanna et al. [43] confirmed that simultaneous application of phosphorus fertilizer significantly enhanced various plant growth characteristics, including plant height, number of branches, number of umbels per plant, and seed yield in coriander. Additionally, a single study by Said-Al Ahl and Hussien [4] indicated that the individual or combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers significantly increased the herb dry weight of S. montana. Our study reinforces these findings, highlighting the importance of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application rates in influencing the biomass production of S. montana.
Previous research indicated that the essential oil % in S. montana dried herb varied from 0.22 to 2.80% depending on the origin [4,30,44,45,46,47]. Sowing date has a significant impact on the percentage of essential oil in Satureja species. A study on S. sahendica revealed that the oil concentration was markedly higher in autumn sowing compared to spring sowing [39]. Piccaglia et al. [48] noted that peppermint plants planted in autumn displayed higher essential oil percentages and oil yields compared to those planted in spring. Similarly, in the case of S. montana, plants fertilized with NP in the second cut exhibited the highest oil yield compared to the first cut, which was attributed to increased herb weight and essential oil content. [4]. The formation of essential oils in medicinal and aromatic plants typically fluctuates based on crucial factors, contributing to significant variations in essential oil as temperature, day-light hours, light intensity, promoting increased photosynthesis as well as soil conditions, and the growth period [46,47,49,50,51]. Specifically, spring cultivation (February and March) resulted in the highest essential percentage in the first cut, while autumn cultivation (October and November) during both seasons yielded the highest percentage for R. officinalis in the second cut under the study conditions [52].
Prior investigations have revealed the effect of fertilization on oil content. Nooshkam et al. [38] observed a higher oil concentration in S. khuzestanica plants with 50 kg N/ha and 30 kg P/ha compared to the dose 50 kg N/ha and 30 kg P/ha. Abd-Allah et al. [28] found a positive effect of high NPK doses (476, 238, and 119 kg/ha) on oil concentration in S. hortensis. Essential oil content displayed an increasing trend with elevated nitrogen or phosphorus application rates, consistent with previous findings, indicating that increased N or P fertilization can enhance essential oil production in certain aromatic plants [25,26,27,34,35,36]. Phosphorus might influence enzymes within the mevalonate pathway, crucial for terpene biosynthesis [53], and, consequently, essential oil production appears to be impacted by P fertilization [54]. Nitrogen fertilization plays a significant role in essential oil biosynthesis by influencing plant metabolism and contributing to the synthesis of plant constituents through various enzymes. Baranauskienne et al. [55] observed that nitrogen fertilizer increased the essential content of thyme and basil. These findings align with previous research indicating that the addition of phosphate and nitrogen fertilization, or their interaction, has a positive effect on essential oil content [43,55,56].
Prior research highlights that achieving a high oil yield in the cultivation of Satureja species is closely linked to either high biomass production or elevated essential concentration [39,44,57,58]. The increased biomass production and essential oil percentage in autumn sowing compared to spring positively influenced the oil yield of S. sahendica [39]. Studies involving S. khuzestanica demonstrated that fertilization dose (50 N and 30 P kg/ha) led to a higher essential content and yield compared to higher doses (100 N and 60 P kg/ha) [38]. Additionally, in other investigations on this species, NPK fertilization (50-25-25 kg/ha) also spurred the essential oil percentage and yield of S. macrantha [59]. Compared to the control, there was a positive trend in essential oil yield with increasing rates of N and P application, indicating that the application of N and P fertilizers enhanced essential oil production in S. montana. This finding is consistent with previous research, suggesting that increased N and P fertilization contributes to higher essential oil production in certain aromatic plant [4,25,26,27,34,35,36], where the greatest increase in essential oil formation is due to phosphorus fertilizer. A plausible explanation for this phenomenon lies in the fact that plant terpenoids are synthesized through a biosynthetic pathway utilizing acetyl coenzyme A as a crucial substrate [59,60], and since P is a constituent element of acetyl-coenzyme A, elevating the P fertilizer amount can stimulate the biosynthesis of plant terpenoids, consequently boosting essential oil yield in S. montana plants.
Our findings align with previous research that identified carvacrol, p-cymene, γ-terpinene, and β-caryophyllene as the predominant compounds in S. montana [1,53]. Kulić et al. [61] reported that the essential of S. montana from Herzegovina was composed of carvacrol (54.9%), γ-terpinene (14.5%), p-cymene (8.8%), β-caryophyllene (3.2%), linalool (1.2%), and thymol (0.3%). However, variations in the composition of essential oils are influenced by factors such as the altitude of plant growth, the time of collection during the season, and the variability of S. montana genotypes [45,62].
A review of the literature indicates substantial variations in the relative concentrations of principal components, including carvacrol, thymol, linalool, γ-terpinene, and p-cymene in S. montana essential oil due to the existence of different chemotypes [63]. Our study revealed that carvacrol was the predominant compound of the essential oil of S. montana cultivated in Egypt, as previously confirmed by [4,64], up to 80%, and so this indicates the promising antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of S. montana essential oil, and from here, S. montana essential oil of Egyptian origin belongs to the carvacrol chemotype and is considered an important agent for potential biological activities.
Piccaglia et al. [48] observed no impact of planting date on oil composition in peppermint plants. In our study, as shown in Table 4, we noticed an increase in carvacrol content when planting in spring compared to autumn. However, the sowing date did not have a clear impact on the composition of linalool, γ-terpinene, β-caryophellene, p-cymene, and thymol compounds.
Previous studies on S. montana have highlighted that ecological factors, characteristic of growth habitats, significantly impact the quantitative and qualitative chemical composition of the essential oil [1,5,6]. Piccaglia and Marotti [48] noted that variations in the relative amounts of thymol, carvacrol, γ-terpinene, and p-cymene in the S. montana essential oil grown in Italy were attributed to the effects of environmental conditions. Kustrak et al. [65] observed variations in oil composition content from plants collected at ten ecologically distinct locations in Croatia, Bosnia, and Herzegovina. The major constituents were carvacrol (30.83–84.19%), thymol (0.45–13.61%), p-cymene (3.36–26.28%), γ-terpinene (0.16–15.87%), linalool (0–11.49%), and β-caryophyllene (0–10.68%). Mirjana and Nada [47] found that carvacrol was the main constituent, especially before flowering, while p-cymene increased through flowering in S. montana. It has also been shown that γ-terpinene and p-cymene are the biogenetic precursors of thymol and carvacrol, and that there is a negative relationship between γ-terpinene and carvacrol [11].
The impact of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on the essential oil composition of S. montana has not been extensively studied. One notable study by Said-Al Ahl and Hussien [4] delved into this, focusing on the chemical composition of essential oils and how it is affected by NP fertilizer. Their findings highlighted changes in the levels of carvacrol, thymol, and their precursors p-cymene and γ-terpinene due to NP fertilizer. Specifically, they observed a decrease in the contents of p-cymene and γ-terpinene compounds with fertilization, while carvacrol and thymol showed an increase. However, the behavior of β-caryophyllene with fertilization was not as clearcut. On the other hand, the second cut gave the highest content of carvacrol, thymol, and β-caryophyllene, while the highest content of p-cymene and γ-terpinene was obtained at the first cut. The highest percentage of carvacrol (80.39%) recorded with fertilization dose (50 Kg N + 30 Kg P/fed.) was in the second cut.
Research on S. hortensis has demonstrated that increased nitrogen fertilization can have an effect on essential oil content and its compositions; the highest carvacrol content was noted for nitrogen dose (4 g N/m) [12]. Nitrogen fertilizer increased the essential oil content and differences in its compositions percentages in Dracocephalum moldavica and Plectranthus amboinicus [56,66]. The authors emphasized that nitrogen directly influences terpene synthesis in plants by being a component of structures involved in the biosynthesis process. Additionally, nitrogen has indirect effects through its impact on photosynthesis, which in turn influences terpene production. This is especially significant in the promotion of carvacrol synthesis, a compound influenced by nitrogen, which results in a reduction in monoterpene hydrocarbons [11,67], a finding that is consistent with our study results.
Additionally, Lima et al. [33] observed differences in oil compounds in Ocimum kilimandscharicum due to phosphorus application. Peng and Ng [34] observed that increasing P fertilization rates led to higher concentrations of β-caryophyllene in the essential oil of Vitex negundo. Also, phosphorus fertilization causes an increase in the essential oil content and differences in the percentages of the compounds of these essential oils for Dracocephalum moldavica, Petroselinum crispum, and Coriandrum sativum [10,13,43].
Bakhtiari et al. [57] observed alterations in the essential oil composition of S. macrantha upon the application of NPK fertilizers, particularly influencing the levels of thymol. Mohammadi et al. [58] suggested that biofertilizers and organic fertilizers (NPK) enhanced the percentage and phenolic compounds (carvacrol) in the essential oil of S. khuzistanica. Peng and Ng [34] also reached the same result that fertilization (NPK) increases essential oils and bioactive compounds in Vitex negundo. As mentioned previously, nitrogen and phosphorus play crucial roles in various biochemical pathways responsible for the synthesis of important plant compounds, including secondary metabolites. The synergistic action of N and P may contribute to more pronounced effects on these processes, potentially accounting for substantial changes in essential oil composition [67]. Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential structural components of proteins, phospholipids, and coenzymes structures, and also participate in various physiological metabolisms of plants and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. P is used in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites such as monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes, components of essential oils [34].
The chemical composition of S. montana essential oil appears to be influenced by factors such as geographic origin and environmental conditions, particularly temperature and light exposure. Additionally, fertilization practices have a noticeable impact on the makeup of essential oils. These findings suggest that the quantity, method, and type of fertilization should be carefully adjusted to optimize the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and consequently enhance the content of the desired bioactive components.
S. montana under study in Egypt is classified as a carvacrol chemotype as it is the only main compound whose percentage exceeds 80% [4,64]. The importance of carvacrol as an oxygenated monoterpenes that has known antimicrobial, anti-septic, and antioxidant agents with low acute toxicity and weak genotoxic potential [4,68]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Commission (EC) have approved carvacrol as an additive [68]. We recommended cultivation S. montana L., a carvacrol chemotype in Egypt, as a new and important source of carvacrol used as potent agents in food preservation and for the therapeutic or nutraceutical industries.
In a study by Marin et al. [67], S. montana was collected from various regions, and its essential oil was extracted, revealing significant antioxidant activity measured at 4.21 mg/mL, surpassing results obtained from S. montana samples collected in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The essential oils of many Satureja species, including thymol and carvacrol, exhibit antimicrobial activity, making S. montana a promising source for the production of food products with antioxidant effects and herbal preparations with antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [69,70]. In a study by Tumbas et al. [71], various extracts derived from S. montana essential oil, including n-butanol, methanol, and water extracts, showed significant antioxidant effects against DPPH radicals at concentrations of 0.20 and 0.30 mg/mL. These extracts demonstrated antioxidative activity equivalent to 100%. On the other hand, the ethyl acetate extract did not display notable antioxidative effects at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.15 mg/mL. However, at higher concentrations (0.15 to 0.3 mg/mL), the ethyl acetate extract showed improved antioxidative activity, with antioxidative activity values ranging from 16.88% to 32.5%. Mihajilov-Krstev et al. [44] also reported that S. montana essential oil displayed antimicrobial, antioxidant activity, and antifungal compounds. In a study by Lin et al. [72], they tested 42 of the most commonly used essential oils. Among them, cinnamon bark (91.4 ± 0.002%), origanum (86.66 ± 0.008%), and wild thyme (52.54 ± 0.016%) showed the strongest DPPH free-radical scavenging activity at a concentration of 5 mg/mL. In our work, S. montana essential oil showed 69.37% activity against DPPH radical, which is among the second most potent EO among all the EOs tested compared to the reported study.
Our results are consistent with prior research highlighting the antibacterial efficacy of S. montana essential oil against various microorganisms, attributed to the potent antimicrobial properties of carvacrol and thymol [73,74,75]. Pino-Otín et al. [76], in their study on S. montana, documented the bactericidal properties against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria, along with fungicidal effects on C. albicans. The essential oil, particularly rich in carvacrol and thymol, demonstrated significant efficacy against priority 1 bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aerogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Acinetobacter baumannii, as designated by the World Health Organization (WHO). Given the antimicrobial efficacy of S. montana essential oil and ethanol extracts, they could serve as valuable ingredients in medicinal formulations such as oral liquids, foodborne disease treatments, and sprays for wound care, oral infections, and other infectious ailments [5]. Further research has highlighted the abundance of essential oils in S. montana, particularly carvacrol and thymol, which are oxygen-containing phenolic monoterpenes [77]. These compounds, notably carvacrol and thymol isomers, found in winter savory, exhibit a range of beneficial biological activities [78,79]. Vladic et al. [80] concluded that carvacrol content ranged from 71% to 82%, with an average of 78.61%. Furthermore, carvacrol has been confirmed as an antitumor agent. The antibacterial efficacy of essential oils has been extensively examined using direct contact antimicrobial assays, including diffusion and dilution techniques, confirming their well-established antibacterial properties against various pathogens [81]. The study conducted by Mihajilov-Krstev et al. [44] found that Gram-positive bacteria, including S. aureus, exhibited greater susceptibility to S. montana essential oil. Ćavar et al. [82] observed varying levels of resistance in different bacterial strains, with P. aeruginosa displaying higher resistance. Carramiñana et al. [83] demonstrated the efficacy of S. montana essential oil against clinical entero-pathogens such as Vibrio parahaemolyticus, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Plesiomonas shigelloides, Shigella flexneri, and Yersinia enterocolitica. Our findings support the sensitivity of S. aureus to S. montana essential oil, aligning with previous studies on Gram-positive bacteria. Our research further validates the established efficacy of S. montana essential oil in inhibiting the growth and survival of Listeria monocytogenes [83] and preventing food contamination from Bacillus cereus [84]. Additionally, the observed antibacterial properties against pathogenic and spoilage yeasts, as highlighted by Ciani et al. [85], underscore the broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity of S. montana essential oil. Notably, S. montana essential oil demonstrates potent antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive (Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus haemolyticus) and Gram-negative clinical isolates (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens) [1].
Our findings, in line with Vitanza et al. [84], highlight the potential of S. montana essential oil to effectively inhibit biofilm formation and disrupt preexisting biofilm, particularly demonstrating a dose-dependent effect against L. monocytogenes. Pino-Otín et al. [76] suggest that S. montana oil could serve as an alternative to conventional antibiotics.
With growing concerns about the safety of food additives, consumers are increasingly turning to natural options to replace chemical preservatives. These alternatives include plant extracts, in particular essential oils, which are gaining attention for their potential use in food preservation. Essential oils derived from plants, which are generally considered safe, are becoming increasingly popular due to their widespread acceptance among consumers and their consistency with the growing demand for natural alternatives [86,87]. These compounds are considered safe for application in food products, and their use as preservatives is driven by their antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties, providing a natural alternative to synthetic preservatives [86,87,88,89].
Numerous species within the Satureja genus, such as S. aintabensis Davis, S. bachtiarica Bung, S. cilicica Davis, S. cuneifolia Ten, S. hellenica Halásky, S. hortensis L., and S. intermedia, have shown promising potential. Evaluations of S. montana essential oil have demonstrated their efficacy against a diverse range of arthropods, including mites, ticks, and plant-harming nematodes. These insects belong to various orders, such as Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Homoptera, Lepidoptera, Phthiraptera, and Thysanoptera [90].

5. Conclusions

In our investigation of S. montana, we established the impact of sowing date and NP fertilization doses on fresh weight, essential oil, and its composition. In fact, a significant effect of planting date on the fresh weight was observed during the two cuts. Fresh weight values were significantly higher when S. montana planted in autumn compared to planted in spring. Also, there was significant effect from planting date and fertilizer treatments observed in the first cut, but not significant during the second cut. The opposite result was obtained regarding to oil content (%), while in the oil yield, there was a discrepancy between the first and second cuts, as planting in the autumn gave a significant increase in the first cut, while planting in March gave a significant increase in the second cut. Higher total plant biomass was obtained by sowing in autumn with N fertilization at 55 kg/ha and P fertilization at 37 kg/ha (245.4 and 405.6 fresh weight, g per plant) during the first and second cuts, respectively. However, under phosphorus fertilization, increasing P application rates can effectively promote essential oil production; furthermore, the application of 74 kg P kg/ha has the optimal essential oil content (0.458 and 0.458%) in March sowing during the first and second cuts. The highest total oil yield (1.553 mL per plant) resulted from spring sowing with 55 kg N/ha and 74 kg P/ha at the second cut. Carvacrol was the predominant compound of the essential oil of S. montana cultivated in Egypt, up to 80%. Its percentage increased with increasing NP fertilization, reaching the highest (76.67 and 77.37%) of the highest dose of fertilization (110 kg N/ha and 74 kg P/ha) during autumn and spring planting, respectively. S. montana essential oil is biologically effective, as a result of carvacrol, with thymol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene compounds show promise as antioxidants, antimicrobial agents, and anti-insect agents. As a final consideration emerging from the study, S. montana essential oil exhibited notable antioxidant activity. The most potent in vitro antimicrobial effect was observed against Gram-positive S. aureus, and the in situ method on the kohlrabi model demonstrated efficacy against all three Gram-negative bacteria. S. montana essential oil emerges as a potential method for extending the shelf-life of vegetables. Therefore, we recommend the cultivation of S. montana L., especially the chemotype with carvacrol, as a valuable medicinal plant that has recently begun to be cultivated in Egypt. For optimum results, we recommend autumn planting with nitrogen fertilization at 55 kg/ha and phosphorus fertilization at 37 kg/ha in order to obtain the highest yield of fresh herb. Conversely, spring sowing combined with nitrogen fertilization at 55 kg/ha and phosphorus fertilization at 74 kg/ha is recommended to achieve the highest yield of essential oil. Further agricultural research on S. montana is warranted to maximize fresh herb and essential oil production under Egyptian conditions. In addition, investigation of its diverse chemical constituents may increase its biological importance and expand its use in the pharmaceutical, nutritional, and cosmetic fields.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13050328/s1, Table S1. Analysis of statistical significance (p-value) of sowing date and N-P fertilization for fresh weight, oil content and oil yield; Table S2. Effect of fertilization with N and P as well as their combination on the trace constituents of S. montana essential oil at 2nd cut in the second season during planting dates at 2nd cut in the second season; Table S3. Effect of sowing date and fertilization with N and P as well as their combination on the major chemical compound groups of S. montana essential oil at 2nd cut in the second season.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A.H.S.-A.A., A.A.M. and K.G.T.; methodology, H.A.H.S.-A.A., A.A.M., M.K. and N.Č.; software, M.S., K.B., A.B. and H.A.H.S.-A.A.; validation, A.A.M., H.A.H.S.-A.A. and K.B.; formal analysis, M.S., M.K., N.Č., A.B. and K.B.; investigation, H.A.H.S.-A.A., M.S. and K.B.; resources, M.S., K.B., K.G.T., H.A.H.S.-A.A., W.M.H., S.S., S.M.A.-B., M.K. and N.Č.; data cu-ration, K.B., M.K., S.M.A.-B., W.M.H., M.K., N.Č. and K.G.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.A.-B., M.K., N.Č., A.B., M.S., K.B., S.S. and W.M.H.; writing—review and editing, K.G.T.; H.A.H.S.-A.A., A.A.M., N.Č., A.B. and M.K.; visualization, S.M.A.-B., W.M.H., M.K., N.Č. and H.A.H.S.-A.A.; supervision, H.A.H.S.-A.A. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the grant APVV-20-0058 “The potential of the essential oils from aromatic plants for medical use and food preservation”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Maccelli, A.; Vitanza, L.; Imbriano, A.; Fraschetti, C.; Filippi, A.; Goldoni, P.; Maurizi, L.; Ammendolia, M.G.; Crestoni, M.E.; Fornarini, S.; et al. Satureja montana L. essential oils: Chemical profiles/phytochemical screening, antimicrobial activity and O/W nano-emulsion formulations. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bastami, A.; Amirnia, R.; Sayyed, R.Z.; El Enshasy, H.A. The effect of mycorrhizal fungi and organic fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative traits of two important Satureja species. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vilmosh, N.; Georgieva-Kotetarova, M.; Dimitrova, S.; Zgureva, M.; Atanassova, P.K.; Hrischev, P.I.; Kostadinova, I. Composition and chronic toxicity of dry methanol-aqueous extract of wild-growing Satureja montana. Folia Med. 2023, 65, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H.; Hussien, M.S. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus application on herb and essential oil composition of Satureja montana L. ‘carvacrol’ chemotype. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2016, 8, 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hudz, N.; Makowicz, E.; Shanaida, M.; Biało, M.; Jasicka-Misiak, I.; Yezierska, O.; Svydenko, L.; Wieczorek, P.P. Phytochemical evaluation of tinctures and essential oil obtained from Satureja montana Herb. Molecules 2020, 25, 4763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Acimovic, M.; Šovljanski, O.; Pezo, L.; Travičić, V.; Tomić, A.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Ćetković, G.; Švarc-Gajić, J.; Brezo-Borjan, T.; Sofrenić, I. Variability in biological activities of Satureja montana subsp. montana and subsp. variegata based on different extraction methods. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dordevic, N.; Karabegovic, I.; Cvetkovic, D.; Šojic, B.; Savic, D.; Danilovic, B. Assessment of chitosan coating enriched with free and nanoencapsulated Satureja montana L. essential oil as a novel tool for beef preservation. Foods 2022, 11, 2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H.; Sabra, A.S.; Alataway, A.; Astatkie, T.; Mahmoud, A.A.; Bloem, E. Biomass production and essential oil composition of Thymus vulgaris in response to water stress and harvest time. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2018, 31, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Soltanbeigi, A.; Özgüven, M.; Hassanpouraghdam, M.B. Planting-date and cutting-time affect the growth and essential oil composition of Mentha × piperita and Mentha arvensis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 170, 113790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H.; Abdou, M.A.A. Impact of water stress and phosphorus fertilizer on fresh herb and essential oil content of dragonhead. Int. Agrophysics 2009, 23, 403–407. [Google Scholar]
  11. Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H.; Omer, E.A.; Naguib, N.Y. Effect of water stress and nitrogen fertilizer on herb and essential oil of oregano. Int. Agrophysics 2009, 23, 269–275. [Google Scholar]
  12. Skubij, N.; Dzida, K. Essential oil composition of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.) cv. Saturn depending on nitrogen nutrition and plant development phases in raw material cultivated for industrial use. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 135, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alharbi, B.M.; Mahmoud, A.A.; Astatkie, T.; Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H. Growth and essential oil composition responses of parsley cultivars to phosphorus fertilization and harvest date. J. Plant Nutr. 2018, 42, 2395–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Saharkhiz, M.J.; Estahbanati, M.N.; Rezaei, M.; Tafazoli, E.; Delavar, H. Foliar application of diammonium phosphate increases essential oil content and changes its compositions in Mexican marigold (Tagetes minuta L.). J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2012, 15, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Letchamo, W.; Xu, H.L.; Gosselin, A. Variations in photosynthesis and essential oil in thyme. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 147, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Damjanovic-Vratnica, B.; Perovic, A.; Sukovic, D.; Perovic, S. Effect of vegetation cycle on chemical content and antibacterial activity of Satureja montana L. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2011, 63, 1173–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jackson, M.L. Soil Chemical Analysis; Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  18. Guenther, G. The Essential Oils VIII, E.D. Robert; Nastrand Comp. Inc.: Toronto, ON, Canada; New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1961. [Google Scholar]
  19. Masada, Y. Analysis of Essential Oils by Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  20. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oils Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadruple Mass Spectroscopy, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing Corp: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sánchez-Moreno, C.; Larrauri, J.A.; Saura-Calixto, F. A procedure to measure the antiradical efficiency of polyphenols. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998, 76, 270–276. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kačániová, M.; Vukovic, N.L.; Čmiková, N.; Galovičová, L.; Schwarzová, M.; Šimora, V.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Kluz, M.I.; Puchalski, C.; Bakay, L.; et al. Salvia sclarea essential oil chemical composition and biological activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kačániová, M.; Galovičová, L.; Ivanišová, E.; Vukovic, N.L.; Štefániková, J.; Valková, V.; Borotová, P.; Žiarovská, J.; Terentjeva, M.; Felšöciová, S.; et al. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) essential oil for its application in foods. Foods 2020, 9, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kačániová, M.; Galovičová, L.; Valková, V.; Ďuranová, H.; Borotová, P.; Štefániková, J.; Vukovic, N.L.; Vukic, M.; Kunová, S.; Felsöciová, S.; et al. Chemical composition and biological activity of Salvia officinalis essential oil. Acta Hortic. Regiotect. 2021, 24, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ninou, E.; Cook, C.M.; Papathanasiou, F.; Aschonitis, V.; Avdikos, I.; Tsivelikas, A.L.; Stefanou, S.; Ralli, P.; Mylonas, I. Nitrogen effects on the essential oil and biomass production of field grown Greek oregano (Origanum vulgare subsp. hirtum) Populations. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Malaka, M.J.; Araya, N.A.; Soundy, P.; du Plooy, C.P.; Araya, H.T.; Van Rensburg, W.S.J.; Watkinson, E.; Levember, E.; Wadiwala, E.; Amoo, S.O. Biomass, essential oil yield, and composition of marjoram as influenced by interactions of different agronomic practices under controlled conditions. Plants 2023, 12, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Muetasam Jafr, S.; Rahimi, A.R.; Hashemi, M.; Rokhzadi, A. Influence of N, K, and seaweed extract fertilization on biomass, photosynthetic pigments, and essential oil of Thymus vulgaris: Optimization study by response surface methodology. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abd-Allah, W.H. Effect of chemical fertilization and biofertilization on growth and productivity of savory (Satureja hortensis L.) plants. Egypt. J. Desert Res. 2015, 65, 101–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lawlor, D.W.; Mengel, K.; Kirkby, E.A. Principles of plant nutrition. Ann. Bot. 2004, 93, 479–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dunkić, V.; Bezić, N.; Vuko, E.; Cukrov, D. Antiphytoviral activity of Satureja montana L. spp. variegata (Host) P. W. Ball Essential oil and phenol compounds on CMV and TMV. Molecules 2010, 15, 6713–6721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thomson, C.; Marschner, H.; Römheld, V. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer form on pH of the bulk soil and rhizosphere, and on the growth, phosphorus, and micronutrient uptake of bean. J. Plant Nutr. 1993, 16, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ruan, J.; Zhang, F.; Wong, M.H. Effect of nitrogen form and phosphorus source on the growth, nutrient uptake and rhizosphere soil property of Camellia sinensis L. Plant Soil 2000, 223, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lima, V.T.; Vieira, M.C.; Formagio, A.S.N.; Zárate, N.A.H.; Cardoso, C.A.L.; Gonçalves, W.V.; Aran, H.D.V.R.; Carnevali, T.O. Chicken manure and phosphorus influence on biomass production and chemical composition of the essential oil of Ocimum kilimandscharicum. J. Agri. Sci. 2020, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peng, L.-C.; Ng, L.-T. Impacts of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on biomass, polyphenol contents, and essential oil yield and composition of Vitex negundo Linn. Agriculture 2022, 12, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Matłok, N.; Gorzelany, J.; Stępień, A.E.; Figiel, A.; Balawejder, M. Effect of fertilization in selected phytometric features and contents of bioactive compounds in dry matter of two varieties of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Sustainability 2019, 11, 6590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Matłok, N.; Stępień, A.E.; Gorzelany, J.; Wojnarowska-Nowak, R.; Balawejder, M. Effects of organic and mineral fertilization on yield and selected quality parameters for dried herbs of two varieties of oregano (Origanum vulgare L.). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H.; Mehanna, H.M.; Ramadan, M.F. Impact of water regime and phosphorus fertilization and their interaction on the characteristics of rapeseed (Brassica napus) and fatty acid profile of extracted oil. Commun. Biometry Crop. Sci. 2016, 11, 64–76. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nooshkam, A.; Hosseini, N.M.; Hadian, J.; Jahansooz, M.R.; Khavazi, K.; Salehnia, A.N.; Hedayatpour, S. Study the effects of biological and chemical fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of savory species (Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad). J. Crop Prod. 2016, 8, 87–103. [Google Scholar]
  39. Abbaszadeh, B.; Sefidkon, F.; Haghighi, M.L.; Hajiabadi, E.K. The Effect of planting time and planting density on yield and essential oil of Satureja sahendica Bornm. J. Med. Plants By-Prod. 2014, 3, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Righini, D.; Zanetti, F.; Martínez-Force, E.; Mandrioli, M.; Toschi, T.G.; Monti, A. Shifting sowing of camelina from spring to autumn enhances the oil quality for bio-based applications in response to temperature and seed carbon stock. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 137, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sahzabi, A.A.; Ashoorabadi, E.S.; Shiranirad, A.H.; Bohlool; Farahani, H.A. The methods of nitrogen application influence on essential oil yield and water use efficiency of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.). Int. J. Hortic. Floric. 2010, 7, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pirzad, A.; Mashmoul, A.; Hassani, A. Effect of chemical and biological phosphorus on the yield of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.). J. Med. Plants By-Prod. 2016, 1, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehanna, H.M.; Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H.; Mursy, M.H.; Ngezimana, W.; Mudau, F.N. Yield and essential oil response in coriander to water stress and phosphorus fertilizer application. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2015, 18, 82–92. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mihajilov-Krstev, T.; Radnović, D.; Kitić, D.; Jovanović, V.; Mitić, V.; Stojanović-Radić, Z.; Zlatković, B. Chemical composition, antimicrobial, antioxidative and anticholinesterase activity of Satureja montana L. ssp montana essential oil. Open Life Sci. 2014, 9, 668–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ibraliu, A.; Dhillon, B.S.; Faslia, N.; Stich, B. Variability of essential oil composition in Albanian accessions of Satureja montana L. J. Med. Plants. Res. 2010, 4, 1359–1364. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fraternale, D.; Giamperi, L.; Bucchini, A.; Ricini, D.; Epifano, F.; Genovese, S.; Curini, M. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of the essential oil of Satureja montana from central Italy. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2007, 43, 622–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mirjana, S.; Nada, B. Chemical composition and antimicrobial variability of Satureja montana L. essential oils produced during ontogenesis. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2004, 16, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Piccaglia, R.; Dellacecca, V.; Marotti, M.; Giovanelli, E. Agronomic factors affecting the yields and the essential oil composition of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). Acta Hortic. 1993, 344, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baydar, H. The effects of different harvest dates on essential oil content and essential oil composition in Origanum minutiflorum O. Schwarz et. P.H. Davis. Akdeniz Univ. J. Fac. Agricult. 2005, 18, 175–178. [Google Scholar]
  50. Saeb, K.; Gholamrezaee, S. Variation of essential oil composition of Melissa officinalis L. leaves during different stages of plant growth. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S547–S549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Türkmen, M.; Kara, M.; Maral, H.; Soylu, S. Determination of chemical component of essential oil of plants grown at different altitudes and antifungal activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e15787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Massoud, H.Y.A.; Abd El-Shafy, M.K.; El-Eraky, M. Influence of planting dates and distances on growth and essential oil productivity of Rosmarinus officinalis L. plant. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 2007, 32, 2937–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bruneton, J. Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry, Medicinal Plants, 2nd ed.; Lavoisier and Publishing: Paris, France, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kapoor, R.; Giri, B.; Mukerji, K.G. Improved growth and essential oil yield and quality in Foeniculum vulgare mill on mycorrhizal inoculation supplemented with P-fertilizer. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Baranauskienne, R.; Venskutonis, P.R.; Viskelis, P.; Dambrausiene, E. Influence of nitrogen fertilizers on the yield and composition of thyme (Thymus vulgaris). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7751–7758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H.; Hussein, M.S.; Abd El-Kader, A.A. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and/or some foliar application on growth, herb yield, essential oil and chemical composition of dragonhead. J. Med. Food Plants 2010, 2, 12–28. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bakhtiari, M.; Mozafari, H.; Karimzadeh Asl, K.; Sani, B.; Mirza, M. Bio-organic and inorganic fertilizers modify leaf nutrients, essential oil properties, and antioxidant capacity in medic savory (Satureja macrantha). J. Biol. Res. 2020, 93, 8477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mohammadi, S.M.; Sefidkon, F.; Asadi-Sanam, S.; Kalatejari, S. The changes of carvacrol content and essential oil yield of Satureja khuzestanica Jamzad in response to different fertilizer sources. Flavour. Fragr. J. 2023, 38, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gershenzon, J. Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20, 1281–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, D.; Du, X.; Liang, X.; Han, R.; Liang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhao, J. Different roles of the mevalonate and methylerythritol phosphate pathways in cell growth and tanshinone production of Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kulić, M.; Drakul, D.; Sokolović, D.; Kordić-Bojinović, J.; Milovanović, S.; Blagojević, D. Essential oil of Satureja montana L. from Herzegovina: Assessment of composition, antispasmodic, and antidiarrheal effects. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2023, 17, 3. [Google Scholar]
  62. Bojović, D.; Šoškić, M.; Tadić, V. Comparative study of chemical composition of the essential oils from Satureja cuneifolia Ten. and Satureja montana L., lamiaceae collected at National Park Lovćen, Montenegro. Stud. Univ. Babeș-Bolyai Chem. 2018, 63, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Čopra-Janićijević, A.; Vidic, D.; Maksimović, M. Chemical composition of the essential oil and headspace of Satureja montana L. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2020, 7, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hassanein, H.D.; Said-AL Ahl, H.A.H.; Abdelmohsen, M.M. Antioxidant polyphenolic constituents of Satureja montana L. grown. in Egypt. Int J. Pharm. Pharm. 2014, 6, 578–581. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kustrak, D.; Kuftinec, J.; Blazevic, N.; Maffei, M. Comparison of the essential oil composition of two subspecies of Satureja montana. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1996, 8, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Abdelrazik, T.M.; Sabra, A.S.; Astatkie, T.; Hegazy, M.H.; Grulova, D.; Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H. Response of growth, essential oil content and its constituent’s of Plectranthus amboinicus to iron and/or urea foliar application under saline irrigation. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 8, 223–231. [Google Scholar]
  67. Marin, M.; Novaković, M.; Tešević, V.; Vučković, I.; Milojević, N.; Vuković-Gačić, B.; Marin, P.D. Antioxidative, antibacterial and antifungal activity of the essential oil of wild-growing Satureja montana L. from Dalmatia, Croatia. Flavour Fragr. J. 2012, 27, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. De Vincenzi, M.; Stammati, A.; De Vincenzi, A.; Silano, M. Constituents of aromatic plants: Carvacrol. Fitoterapia 2004, 75, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tepe, B.; Cilkiz, M.A. A pharmacological and phytochemical overview on Satureja. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 54, 375412. [Google Scholar]
  70. Hajdari, A.; Mustafa, B.; Kaçiku, A.; Xhavit, M.; Brigitte, L.; Alban, I.; Gjoshe, S.; Johannes, N. Chemical composition of the essential oil, total phenolics, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts of Satureja montana L. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2016, 10, 750–760. [Google Scholar]
  71. Tumbas, V.; Djilas, S. Antioxidative and antiproliferative effects of Satureja montana L. extracts. J. BUON 2004, 9, 443–449. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lin, C.W.; Yu, C.W.; Wu, S.C.; Yih, K.H. DPPH free-radical scavenging activity, total phenolic contents and chemical composition analysis of forty-two kinds of essential oils. J. Food Drug Anal. 2009, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lombrea, A.; Antal, D.; Ardelean, F.; Avram, S.; Pavel, I.Z.; Vlaia, L.; Mut, A.-M.; Diaconeasa, Z.; Dehelean, C.A.; Soica, C.; et al. A Recent insight regarding the phytochemistry and bioactivity of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Memar, M.Y.; Raei, P.; Alizadeh, N.; Aghdam, M.A.; Kafil, H.S. Carvacrol and thymol: Strong antimicrobial agents against resistant isolates. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 28, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kachur, K.; Suntres, Z. The antibacterial properties of phenolic isomers, carvacrol and thymol. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3042–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pino-Otín, M.R.; Gan, C.; Terrado, E.; Sanz, M.A.; Ballestero, D.; Langa, E. Antibiotic properties of Satureja montana L. hydrolate in bacteria and fungus of clinical interest and its impact in non-target environmental microorganisms. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dunkić, V.; Kremer, D.; Dragojević Müller, I.; Stabentheiner, E.; Kuzmić, S.; Jurišić Grubešić, R.; Vujić, L.; Kosalec, I.; Randić, M.; Srěcec, S.; et al. Chemotaxonomic and micromorphological traits of Satureja montana L. and S. subspicata Vis. (Lamiaceae). Chem. Biodivers. 2012, 9, 2825–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Parsaei, P.; Bahmani, M.; Naghdi, N.; Asadi-Samani, M.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. A review of therapeutic and pharmacological effects of thymol. Der Pharm. Lett. 2016, 8, 150–154. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Varoni, E.M.; Iriti, M.; Martorell, M.; Setzer, W.N.; del Mar Contreras, M.; Salehi, B.; Soltani-Nejad, A.; Rajabi, S.; Tajbahshs, M.; et al. Carvacrol and human health: A comprehensive review. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 1675–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Vladić, J.; Ćebović, T.; Vidović, S.; Jokić, S. Evaluation of anticancer activity of Satureja montana supercritical and spray-dried extracts on Ehrlich’s ascites carcinoma bearing mice. Plants 2020, 9, 1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Holley, R.A.; Patel, D. Improvement in shelf-life and safety of perishable foods by plant essential oils and smoke antimicrobials. Food Microbiol. 2005, 22, 273–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ćavar, S.; Maksimović, M.; Šolić, M.E.; Jerković-Mujkić, A.; Bešta, R. Chemical composition and antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of two Satureja essential oils. Food Chem. 2008, 111, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Carramiñana, J.J.; Rota, C.; Burillo, J.; Herrera, A. Antibacterial efficiency of Spanish Satureja montana essential oil against Listeria monocytogenes among natural flora in Minced Pork. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Vitanza, L.; Maccelli, A.; Marazzato, M.; Scazzocchio, F.; Comanducci, A.; Fornarini, S.; Crestoni, M.E.; Filippi, A.; Fraschetti, C.; Rinaldi, F.; et al. Satureja montana L. essential oil and its antimicrobial activity alone or in combination with gentamicin. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 126, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ciani, M.; Menghini, L.; Mariani, F.; Pagiotti, R.; Menghini, A.; Fatichenti, F. Antimicrobial properties of essential oil of Satureja montana L. on pathogenic and spoilage yeasts. Biotechnol. Lett. 2000, 22, 1007–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Gutierrez, J.; Barry-Ryan, C.; Bourke, P. Antimicrobial activity of plant essential oils using food model media, efficacy, synergisticpotential and interactions with food components. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Smith-Palmer, A.; Stewart, J.; Fyfe, L. Antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils and essences against five important food-borne pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 26, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ebadollahi, A.; Jalali Sendi, J.; Ziaee, M.; Krutmuang, P. Acaricidal, insecticidal, and nematicidal efficiency of essential oils isolated from the Satureja genus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fresh weight of Satureja montana (g per plant) as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization, sum from the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons. Data are the mean (±SD) of 3 samples. a–j Different letters refer to significant differences for D × F (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Fresh weight of Satureja montana (g per plant) as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization, sum from the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons. Data are the mean (±SD) of 3 samples. a–j Different letters refer to significant differences for D × F (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Biology 13 00328 g001
Figure 2. Oil yield (ml/per plant FW) of Satureja montana as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization, sum from the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons. Data are the mean (±SD) of three samples. a–i Different letters refer to significant differences for D × F (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Oil yield (ml/per plant FW) of Satureja montana as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization, sum from the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons. Data are the mean (±SD) of three samples. a–i Different letters refer to significant differences for D × F (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Biology 13 00328 g002
Table 1. Fresh weight (FW) (g per plant) of S. montana as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization in the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons.
Table 1. Fresh weight (FW) (g per plant) of S. montana as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization in the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons.
Fertilization
(F)
Cut
1st Cut2nd Cut
Date of Sowing (D)
OctoberMarchMeanOctoberMarchMean
N0_P0140.5 ± 8.73 f–h102.5 ± 8.12 i121.5 ± 22.2 F218.6 ± 9.19 f210.2 ± 0.884 f214.4 ± 7.43 F
N0_P37145.8 ± 4.92 fg112.7 ± 1.70 ij129.2 ± 18.5 F247.9 ± 5.23 e222.0 ± 3.01 ef235.0 ± 14.7 E
N0_P74185.9 ± 5.28 e118.2 ± 9.81 ij151.5 ± 38.3 E307.6 ± 10.6 cd302.7 ± 4.40 cd305.1 ± 7.72 CD
N55_P0 205.4 ± 7.95 c–e128.7 ± 5.84 g–i167.0 ± 42.5 D308.8 ± 6.29 cd288.7 ± 4.03 d298.7 ± 12.0 D
N55_P37245.4 ± 7.33 a199.5 ± 9.41 c–e222.4 ± 26.3 A405.6 ± 14.5 a373.9 ± 1.58 b389.7 ± 19.6 A
N55_P74214.2 ± 10.0 bc192.1 ± 2.07 de203.2 ± 13.7 B375.9 ± 22.2 b380.5 ± 8.00 ab378.2 ± 15.2 A
N110_P0228.3 ± 3.52 ab150.8 ± 4.31 f189.5 ± 42.6 C362.7 ± 7.00 b325.2 ± 4.18 c343.9 ± 21.1 B
N110_P37196.5 ± 3.69 c–e120.9 ± 4.43 h–j158.7 ± 41.5 DE307.6 ± 10.4 cd310.1 ± 9.78 cd308.8 ± 9.12 CD
N110_P74206.6 ± 1.53 cd127.2 ± 8.08 g–i166.9 ± 43.8 D322.1 ± 2.83 c313.0 ± 8.18 cd317.5 ± 7.41 C
Mean196.5 ± 33.9 A139.0 ± 33.9 B167.8 ± 44.4317.4 ± 57.7 A302.9 ± 56.1 B310.2 ± 56.8
Data are the mean (±SD) of three samples. A–F Different uppercase letters refer to significant differences for D or F (Tukey, p < 0.05); a–j Different lowercase letters refer to significant differences for D × F (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Table 2. Oil content in fresh herb (mL/100 g FW) of S. montana as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization in the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons.
Table 2. Oil content in fresh herb (mL/100 g FW) of S. montana as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization in the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons.
Fertilization
(F)
Cut
1st Cut2nd Cut
Date of Sowing (D)
OctoberMarchMeanOctoberMarchMean
N0_P00.238 ± 0.018 h0.267 ± 0.008 g0.253 ± 0.020 E0.282 ± 0.008 i0.302 ± 0.013 g–i0.292 ± 0.014 G
N0_P370.288 ± 0.008 fg0.365 ± 0.009 c0.327 ± 0.043 C0.383 ± 0.014 cd0.433 ± 0.012 ab0.408 ± 0.030 AB
N0_P740.333 ± 0.003 d0.438 ± 0.003 a0.386 ± 0.058 A0.387 ± 0.006 cd0.458 ± 0.008 a0.423 ± 0.040 A
N55_P00.283 ± 0.006 fg0.370 ± 0.009 c0.327 ± 0.048 C0.307 ± 0.012 f–i0.387 ± 0.046 cd0.347 ± 0.053 EF
N55_P370.272 ± 0.008 fg0.332 ± 0.003 d0.302 ± 0.033 D0.330 ± 0.009 e–h0.383 ± 0.008 cd0.357 ± 0.030 DE
N55_P740.325 ± 0.009 d0.397 ± 0.006 b0.361 ± 0.040 B0.345 ± 0.005 d–g0.408 ± 0.015 bc0.377 ± 0.036 CD
N110_P00.265 ± 0.005 g0.315 ± 0.010 de0.290 ± 0.028 D0.290 ± 0.000 hi0.350 ± 0.005 d–f0.320 ± 0.033 F
N110_P370.318 ± 0.003 de0.405 ± 0.005 b0.362 ± 0.048 B0.357 ± 0.006 de0.423 ± 0.010 a–c0.390 ± 0.037 BC
N110_P740.297 ± 0.015 ef0.410 ± 0.010 b0.353 ± 0.063 B0.383 ± 0.003 cd0.447 ± 0.010 ab0.415 ± 0.035 AB
Mean0.291 ± 0.031 B0.367 ± 0.052 A0.329 ± 0.0570.340 ± 0.040 B0.399 ± 0.050 A0.370 ± 0.054
Data are the mean (±SD) of three samples. A–G Different uppercase letters refer to significant differences for D or F (Tukey, p < 0.05); a–i Different lowercase letters refer to significant differences for D × F (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Table 3. Oil yield (mL per plant FW) of S. montana as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization in the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons.
Table 3. Oil yield (mL per plant FW) of S. montana as affected by sowing date and NP fertilization in the first and second cut, on average from the first and the second growing seasons.
Fertilization
(F)
Cut
1st Cut2nd Cut
Date of Sowing (D)
OctoberMarchMeanOctoberMarchMean
N0_P00.336 ± 0.044 hi0.274 ± 0.023 i0.305 ± 0.046 E0.616 ± 0.039 h0.634 ± 0.027 h0.625 ± 0.031 G
N0_P370.420 ± 0.004 f–h0.411 ± 0.015 gh0.415 ± 0.011 D0.949 ± 0.017 g0.960 ± 0.034 g0.954 ± 0.025 F
N0_P740.619 ± 0.016 b–d0.484 ± 0.097 e–g0.551 ± 0.097 C1.187 ± 0.029 d–f1.387 ± 0.037 bc1.287 ± 0.114 CD
N55_P00.582 ± 0.011 c–e0.476 ± 0.027 fg0.529 ± 0.061 C0.947 ± 0.017 g1.120 ± 0.144 ef1.034 ± 0.132 EF
N55_P370.665 ± 0.005 a–c0.661 ± 0.037 a–c0.663 ± 0.024 B1.339 ± 0.018 b–d1.434 ± 0.031 ab1.386 ± 0.056 AB
N55_P740.696 ± 0.037 ab0.762 ± 0.004 a0.729 ± 0.043 A1.299 ± 0.089 b–d1.553 ± 0.044 a1.426 ± 0.152 A
N110_P00.605 ± 0.015 b–d0.474 ± 0.015 fg0.540 ± 0.073 C1.052 ± 0.020 fg1.138 ± 0.029 ef1.095 ± 0.052 E
N110_P370.625 ± 0.017 b–d0.490 ± 0.024 e–g0.558 ± 0.077 C1.097 ± 0.037 e–g1.313 ± 0.057 b–d1.205 ± 0.126 D
N110_P740.613 ± 0.035 b–d0.522 ± 0.045 d–f0.567 ± 0.061 C1.235 ± 0.018 c–e1.399 ± 0.060 ab1.317 ± 0.098 BC
Mean0.573 ± 0.115 A0.506 ± 0.138 B0.540 ± 0.1301.080 ± 0.218 B1.215 ± 0.279 A1.148 ± 0.257
Data are the mean (±SD) of three samples. A–G Different uppercase letters refer to significant differences for D or F (Tukey, p < 0.05); a–i Different lowercase letters refer to significant differences for D × F (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Table 4. Effect of sowing date and fertilization with N and P, as well as their combination, on the major and minor constituents of S. montana essential oil (%) at the second cut in the second season.
Table 4. Effect of sowing date and fertilization with N and P, as well as their combination, on the major and minor constituents of S. montana essential oil (%) at the second cut in the second season.
Fertilization (F)CarvacrolThymolp-Cymeneγ-Terpineneβ-CaryophylleneLinalool
Date of Sowing (D)
OctoberMarchOctoberMarchOctoberMarchOctoberMarchOctoberMarchOctoberMarch
N0_P065.3265.412.561.979.779.936.336.561.411.461.921.90
N0_P3767.3268.042.892.977.897.755.034.871.432.220.740.75
N0_P7467.8968.893.693.615.815.914.233.661.311.130.910.95
N55_P065.4565.792.671.999.688.675.245.981.331.681.801.81
N55_P3770.7870.883.743.724.984.93.893.382.932.600.780.72
N55_P7472.3173.053.883.984.774.853.803.322.742.540.651.01
N110_P065.9766.992.962.598.818.35.215.382.392.340.781.45
N110_P3775.4475.923.894.073.793.583.102.192.812.090.900.98
N110_P7476.6777.355.874.763.563.182.962.111.402.110.560.90
Table 5. Antimicrobial activity evaluated with the disc diffusion method in (mm).
Table 5. Antimicrobial activity evaluated with the disc diffusion method in (mm).
MicroorganismInhibition ZoneATB
Gram-positive bacteria
Micrococcus luteus CCM 7328.67 ± 0.58 a29.67 ± 0.58 ab
Listeria monocytogenes CCM 46998.33 ± 0.57 ab30.33 ± 0.57 a
Staphylococcus aureus CCM 39539.33 ± 0.58 a28.33 ± 0.58 b
Gram-negative bacteria
Escherichia coli CCM 39536.67 ± 0.57 bc28.67 ± 0.57 ab
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica CCM 38076.33 ± 0.58 cd29.33 ± 0.58 ab
Yersinia enterocolitica CCM 7204T5.67 ± 0.59 cde29.67 ± 0.58 ab
Yeasts
Candida albicans CCM 81864.33 ± 0.58 e28.33 ± 0.58 b
Candida glabrata CCM 82705.33 ± 0.58 cde29.67 ± 0.58 ab
Candida krusei CCM 82714.67 ± 0.58 de29.33 ± 0.59 ab
Candida tropicalis CCM 82234.33 ± 0.59 e29.67 ± 0.59 ab
Data are the mean (±SD) of three samples. Different letters in each column refer to significant differences (Tukey, p < 0.05). ATB = Antibiotics.
Table 6. Minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) and minimal biofilm inhibition concentration (MBIC) of S. montana essential oil in μg/mL.
Table 6. Minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) and minimal biofilm inhibition concentration (MBIC) of S. montana essential oil in μg/mL.
MicroorganismMIC50MIC90
Gram-positive bacteria
Micrococcus luteus CCM 7323.34 ± 0.21 g3.78 ± 0.10 g
Listeria monocytogenes CCM 46992.42 ± 0.23 h2.73 ± 0.14 h
Staphylococcus aureus CCM 39532.19 ± 0.14 h2.35 ± 0.10 h
Gram-negative bacteria
Escherichia coli CCM 395313.16 ± 0.06 e13.37 ± 0.18 e
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica CCM 380717.35 ± 0.16 d17.63 ± 0.15 d
Yersinia enterocolitica CCM 7204T18.43 ± 0.28 c18.65 ± 0.14 c
Yeasts
Candida albicans CCM 818622.18 ± 0.25 b22.35 ± 0.07 b
Candida glabrata CCM 827023.43 ± 0.10 a23.74 ± 0.22 a
Candida krusei CCM 827122.24 ± 0.08 b22.43 ± 0.10 b
Candida tropicalis CCM 822323.24 ± 0.18 a23.52 ± 0.13 a
Biofilm forming bacteria (BFB)
Salmonella enterica4.56 ± 0.25 f4.79 ± 0.20 f
Data are the mean (±SD) of three samples. Different letters in each column refer to significant differences (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Table 7. In situ analysis of the antimicrobial activity (inhibition of microbial growth %) of the vapor phase of SMEO in kohlrabi.
Table 7. In situ analysis of the antimicrobial activity (inhibition of microbial growth %) of the vapor phase of SMEO in kohlrabi.
Food ModelMicroorganismsConcentration of EO (μg/mL)
Kohlrabi 62.5125250500
Gram-positiveMicrococcus luteus85.34 ± 2.40 b65.48 ± 1.71 bc56.67 ± 1.66 b44.76 ± 1.05 abc
Listeria monocytogenes83.67 ± 0.89 b63.56 ± 2.18 c55.48 ± 1.08 b42.43 ± 0.95 c
Staphylococcus aureus86.46 ± 1.30 b67.43 ± 1.00 b53.25 ± 0.91 b46.65 ± 0.85 a
Gram-negativeEscherichia coli93.38 ± 0.83 a77.43 ± 1.50 a63.65 ± 1.67 a43.54 ± 0.99 bc
Salmonella enterica94.45 ± 1.16 a75.45 ± 1.18 a65.45 ± 1.27 a44.96 ± 0.78 ab
Yersinia enterocolitica96.37 ± 1.30 a74.43 ± 1.08 a66.48 ± 1.28 a46.69 ± 0.89 a
YeastsCandida albicans76.56 ± 1.62 c55.47 ± 1.00 d34.54 ± 0.49 cd15.67 ± 0.58 de
Candida glabrata76.43 ± 0.98 c54.18 ± 1.08 d32.28 ± 0.82 d16.65 ± 0.45 de
Candida krusei75.76 ± 0.88 c56.78 ± 0.88 d35.65 ± 1.75 cd17.54 ± 1.20 d
Candida tropicalis73.43 ± 0.72 c57.77 ± 0.86 d36.56 ± 1.08 c14.76 ± 0.58 e
Data are the mean (±SD) of three samples. Different letters in each column refer to significant differences (Tukey, p < 0.05).
Table 8. Insecticidal activity of SMEO against Harmonia axyridis.
Table 8. Insecticidal activity of SMEO against Harmonia axyridis.
Concentration (%)Number of Living IndividualsNumber of Dead IndividualsInsecticidal Activity (%)
1000100100.00 ± 0.00
50208080.00 ± 0.00
25307070.00 ± 0.00
12.5406060.00 ± 0.00
6.25604040.00 ± 0.00
3.125901010.00 ± 0.00
Control group10000.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H.; Kačániova, M.; Mahmoud, A.A.; Hikal, W.M.; Čmiková, N.; Szczepanek, M.; Błaszczyk, K.; Al-Balawi, S.M.; Bianchi, A.; Smaoui, S.; et al. Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities of Essential Oil from Satureja montana L., a Medicinal Plant Grown under the Influence of Fertilization and Planting Dates. Biology 2024, 13, 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13050328

AMA Style

Said-Al Ahl HAH, Kačániova M, Mahmoud AA, Hikal WM, Čmiková N, Szczepanek M, Błaszczyk K, Al-Balawi SM, Bianchi A, Smaoui S, et al. Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities of Essential Oil from Satureja montana L., a Medicinal Plant Grown under the Influence of Fertilization and Planting Dates. Biology. 2024; 13(5):328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13050328

Chicago/Turabian Style

Said-Al Ahl, Hussein A. H., Miroslava Kačániova, Abeer A. Mahmoud, Wafaa M. Hikal, Natália Čmiková, Małgorzata Szczepanek, Karolina Błaszczyk, Siham M. Al-Balawi, Alessandro Bianchi, Slim Smaoui, and et al. 2024. "Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities of Essential Oil from Satureja montana L., a Medicinal Plant Grown under the Influence of Fertilization and Planting Dates" Biology 13, no. 5: 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13050328

APA Style

Said-Al Ahl, H. A. H., Kačániova, M., Mahmoud, A. A., Hikal, W. M., Čmiková, N., Szczepanek, M., Błaszczyk, K., Al-Balawi, S. M., Bianchi, A., Smaoui, S., & Tkachenko, K. G. (2024). Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities of Essential Oil from Satureja montana L., a Medicinal Plant Grown under the Influence of Fertilization and Planting Dates. Biology, 13(5), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13050328

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop