Next Article in Journal
Activation of Cryptochrome 4 from Atlantic Herring
Previous Article in Journal
Risk Assessment and Sources Apportionment of Toxic Metals in Two Commonly Consumed Fishes from a Subtropical Estuarine Wetland System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Association Study of Early Vigour-Related Traits for a Rice (Oryza sativa L.) japonica Diversity Set Grown in Aerobic Conditions

School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(4), 261; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040261
Submission received: 13 March 2024 / Revised: 2 April 2024 / Accepted: 12 April 2024 / Published: 15 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In this study, we explored a relatively new system of growing rice called aerobic rice production, where rice is direct-seeded and grown with sufficient water, rather than being flooded. Early vigour-related traits are important in aerobic conditions. Our main goal was to find quantitative trait loci and potential genes related to the plant’s early growth and ability in the water-saving conditions. By conducting experiments in both fields and glasshouses, we discovered significant differences in growth among different rice varieties and identified 32 quantitative trait loci linked to these early vigour-related traits. Two quantitative trait loci were found to be crucial and connected to 23 potential growth and stress response genes. These findings highlighted the genetic basis of early vigour-related traits under aerobic conditions and suggest pathways for breeding better-performing rice varieties through marker-assisted selection.

Abstract

Aerobic rice production is a relatively new system in which rice is direct-seeded and grown in non-flooded but well-watered conditions to improve water productivity. Early vigour-related traits are likely to be important in aerobic conditions. This study aimed to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) and candidate genes associated with early vigour-related traits in aerobic conditions using a japonica rice diversity set. Field experiments and glasshouse experiments conducted under aerobic conditions revealed significant genotypic variation in early vigour-related traits. Genome-wide association analysis identified 32 QTL associated with early vigour-related traits. Notably, two QTL, qAEV1.5 and qAEV8, associated with both early vigour score and mesocotyl length, explained up to 22.1% of the phenotypic variance. In total, 23 candidate genes related to plant growth development and abiotic stress response were identified in the two regions. This study provides novel insights into the genetic basis of early vigour under aerobic conditions. Validation of identified QTL and candidate genes in different genetic backgrounds is crucial for future studies. Moreover, testing the effect of QTL on yield under different environments would be valuable. After validation, these QTL and genes can be considered for developing markers in marker-assisted selection for aerobic rice production.

1. Introduction

Rice is traditionally grown under flooded conditions to maximize yield in the Riverina production environment in Australia. Over the past few decades, drill seeding has become increasingly popular and accounted for 70% of Australia’s sowing in the 2018–2019 season [1]. With ever-increasing water restriction, aerobic rice in which rice is grown in well-drained, non-flooded and unsaturated, but well-watered conditions, has been suggested to improve water productivity [2]. While the shift to aerobic rice production could bring substantial advantages, particularly in water savings, there are some challenges, particularly in relation to direct-seeded aerobic rice. For example, Chamara et al. [3] found that crop emergence decreased 60% for direct seeding at a 2 cm sowing depth compared to a 0.5 cm sowing depth in the Philippines. Poor crop establishment was the primary factor leading to a low and unstable yield of direct-seeded aerobic rice [4]. Additionally, weed growth can pose a significant challenge to aerobic production due to absence of the water layer [5]. In order to enhance rice productivity in direct-seeded aerobic rice systems, rice genotypes with high early vigour are likely to be required.
Early vigour is defined as the plant’s capacity to grow rapidly during the seedling stage and has been shown to play a crucial role in determining the ability of seeds to emerge quickly and lead to an ideal field establishment [6]. Early vigour is an agronomic trait that integrates both the plant genetics, physiology and the environment. Namuco et al. [7] reported that increasing early vigour decreased the influence of weed competition. In rice, early vigour is typically associated with germination rate, plant height, shoot biomass, leaf area, seed weight and mesocotyl elongation [8,9,10,11]. Rapid and uniform seed germination is essential for efficient resource utilization during the early growth stage, allowing seedlings to acquire nutrients and water from the soil quickly [8,9]. Plants that are taller and have greater biomass and leaf area can acquire more light and resources from the environment, leading to rapid growth and early canopy closure [10,11]. Additionally, if drill sowing (recommended 2.5–4 cm depth [12]) is adopted in direct seeding to prevent bird damage and lodging after the heading stage [13], mesocotyl elongation becomes critical for good establishment. Mesocotyl elongation can facilitate the rapid emergence of seedlings from the soil surface, leading to stronger and more uniform seedling establishment [13,14]. Ohno et al. [15] found that genotypes with longer mesocotyl had a higher rate of emergence (r = 0.67 **) and shorter days to emergence (r = −0.79 **) among 16 rice genotypes under field conditions planted at an 8.5 cm depth for the screening of mesocotyl elongation. Evaluation of the significance of early vigour-related traits for aerobic production is required, and exploring the underlying genetics that influence the key early vigour traits can provide benefit for genetic improvement for the development of germplasm adapted to aerobic production.
Using linkage mapping methods, studies have been conducted in rice to evaluate the genomic regions associated with early vigour-related traits [16,17,18,19] and mesocotyl length [14,20,21]. For example, utilizing a recombinant inbred line population derived from Lemont and Teqing, Zhang et al. [16] found 18 quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with early vigour-related traits (plant height, dry weight and seed weight) in pot experiments. In the study of Lee et al. [20], five QTL were identified to be associated with mesocotyl length using a backcross inbred line population from Kasalath and Nipponbare in plastic jar experiments. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) has also been conducted to evaluate the genomic regions in rice for early vigour [22,23,24] and mesocotyl length [25,26,27]. Although the correlations between mesocotyl length and early growth traits and related genomic regions were reported, whether there are common genomic regions and candidate genes associated with both early vigour-related traits and mesocotyl length under aerobic field conditions remains unknown.
In this study, GWAS was performed for early vigour-related traits utilizing a japonica diversity set grown under aerobic field and glasshouse conditions. The objectives were to (1) investigate the genotypic variation for early vigour-related traits in a japonica diversity set and explore the relationships among traits; (2) identify genomic regions associated with early vigour-related traits in rice grown under aerobic conditions; and (3) identify potential candidate genes involved in early vigour under aerobic conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experiment Location

Two glasshouse experiments and three field experiments were conducted at the University of Queensland, Australia, in this study. The first glasshouse experiment (GH18) was conducted from November to December 2018 in a temperature-controlled glasshouse at Gatton Campus (27.5551° S, 152.3369° E). The second glasshouse experiment (GH21) was conducted from November to December 2021 in a temperature-controlled glasshouse at St Lucia Campus (27.4975° S, 153.0137° E). The three aerobic field experiments were conducted in three seasons, 2018–2019 (FIELD19), 2019–2020 (FIELD20) and 2021–2022 (FIELD22), at Gatton Campus.

2.2. Plant Material and Experimental Design

A diverse set of 302 genotypes, which was a mix of lowland and upland japonica genotypes compiled by New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, was used in this study. There were 74, 68, 14, 81, 60 and 5 genotypes from Australia, America, Africa, Asia, Europe and unknown sources, respectively. Of these, 302, 292, 283, 241 and 286 genotypes were examined in GH18, GH21, FIELD19, FIELD20 andFIELD22, respectively. The package DiGGer [28] was used to generate a partially replicated row–column design in GH18, FIELD19 and FIELD20. The R package ODW [29] was used to generate a partially replicated row–column design in GH21 and FIELD22.

2.3. Cultural Details of Glasshouse Experiments

In GH18, a balance (Mettler Toledo Analytical balance, 4 decimal places, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) was used to weigh four individual seeds that weighed within 2 mg of the average paddy weight, and the seeds of each genotype were put in an Eppendorf tube in preparation for planting. The tube pots (123 mm height × base of 50 mm square bottomless forestry tubes; 0.21 L; https://www.gardencityplastics.com/t50sfk.html, accessed on 1 September 2018) were lined with cotton to prevent soil escape. The pots were filled with 5 cm of Vertosol soil (a large water-holding capacity soil type with brown or black colour with clay textures, Isbell and NCST [30]) from the Crop Research Unit (27.5393° S, 152.3330° E), Gatton, QLD, Australia. Two seeds were sown at 7 cm from the soil surface to determine genotypic potential of mesocotyl length. Replications one and two were planted on the 12 and 13 November 2018, respectively.
In GH21, one-litre ANOVA® pots (http://www.anovapot.com/, accessed on 1 September 2020) filled with 1.20 ± 0.05 kg Ferrosol soil (a well-drained soil type with red colour with clay–loam to clay textures, Isbell and NCST [30]) from the Redlands Research Station (27.5271° S, 153.2505° E), Cleveland, QLD, Australia, were used for planting. An inverted 5 cm Petri dish was placed 5 cm from the base of the pot to reduce root escape, so any effects of the roots were nullified in the set-up. The Petri dishes were covered with a thin layer of soil, and then 6 g of slow-release Osmocote® Pro 5–6 M fertilizer (17N-11P-10K + 2MgO + TE, ICL Specialty Fertilizers) was put on top of the thin soil layer, and the pots were filled to the specific weight. Six seeds were sown at 2.5 cm depth below the soil surface on 21 November 2021, and one plant was retained in each pot 10 days after sowing (DAS). The pots were placed onto a capillary mat for maintenance of the water supply [31]. Adapting the system described by Hunter et al. [32], the aerobic environment was established by maintaining a constant water table at 4 cm to the base of the pot with a float valve, and all pots were connected to the same reservoir.

2.4. Field Experiments Management

In the three field experiments, the plots were 2 m in length and consisted of 7 rows with an inter-row spacing of 0.22 m. In FIELD19, a basal fertilizer was used at a rate of 480 kg ha−1 at 5 days before sowing using Incitec Pivot’s Pastureboosta (24-4-13-4) with 15 kg ha−1 of zinc sulphate monohydrate included. A pre-emergent herbicide treatment was applied at 5 days after the first irrigation. The treatment used standard rates of the following: (1) Stomp 440 (440 g L−1 Pendimethalin, CropCare, Murarrie, QLD, Australia), (2) Magister (480 gL−1 Clomazone; FMC Australia, North Ryde, NSW, Australia) and (3) Gramoxone (250 g L−1 Paraquat, Syngenta, Basel, Switzerland). In FIELD20 and FIELD22, a basal fertilizer was applied at a rate of 400 kg ha−1 using Incitec Pivot’s CK140S (23-2-18-4) at 5 days before sowing, along with 15 kg ha−1 of zinc sulphate monohydrate. The pre-emergent herbicide treatment in FIELD20 and FIELD22 was consistent with that of FIELD19.
Seeds were drill-sown at a rate of 90 kg ha−1 on the 30 November 2018 in FIELD19, 130 kg ha−1 on the 16 October 2019 in FIELD20 and 130 kg ha−1 on the 8 October 2021 in FIELD22. Seeds were sown at 3–4 cm depth. Irrigation by a lateral boom irrigator was applied three times a week in all the field experiments.

2.5. Measurements of Traits

2.5.1. Glasshouse Traits Measurements

In GH18 and GH21, the pots were checked daily, and emergence was recorded when coleoptile broke the soil surface. The plant height (cm) from the soil to the tip of the youngest fully emerged leaf was collected before harvest at 19 and 22 DAS for GH18 and GH21, respectively. At harvest (19 DAS), in GH18, mesocotyl length (mm) was measured by Vernier Calliper. The weight of the total biomass (aboveground, mg) was recorded after the plants were dried in the oven (60 °C) for three days.

2.5.2. Field Traits Measurements

In the three field experiments, the early vigour score was rated on a 1–9 scale, where 1 represented the most vigorous and 9 represented the least vigorous following Standard Evaluation System for Rice [33]. Early vigour score was taken at 30 DAS in FIELD19, 35 DAS in FIELD20 and 30 DAS in FIELD22.
In FIELD20, early vigour harvest took place at 39 DAS, when two representative 33 cm rows were selected randomly by placing a 33 cm ruler between rows and seedlings were cut from the base of the shoot. Two plants from each plot were randomly chosen from the field, and a ruler was used to measure the early plant height (cm) measured from the ground to the leaf apex at 40 DAS. The seedlings were in an oven for 3 days (65 °C), and then the total biomass was determined using a balance. The total biomass (aboveground, g m−2) was calculated from the seedling dry weight (g) per area harvested (m2). The light interception measurements were recorded at 47 DAS. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was measured by placing a ceptometer (AccuPAR, Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, WA, USA) at a 45° angle to the rows between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. Measurements were recorded above (Ra) and immediately below the canopy (Ru). The light interception efficiency was determined by using the fraction of PAR incepted. Light interception efficiency = (Ra − Ru)/Ra × 100%.

2.6. Phenotypic Data Analysis

A multiplicative linear mixed model was used for analysis and was implemented in ASReml-R in the R environment (V4.2) [34]. The best spatial model was fitted for each trait using the method described by Isik et al. [35]. Genotype was treated as both a random effect to estimate heritability and a fixed effect to obtain the best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs), while the blocking terms (replication, row and column) were treated as random effects.
Heritability refers to the proportion of phenotypic variation in a population that is attributable to genetic variation and was calculated using Cullis_H2 (Calculate Generalized Heritability from lme4 Model) package.
Heritability = 1 − (vblup/(2 × var_g)).
  • vblup—the average standard error of differences between BLUPs squared.
  • var_g—the genotypic variance.
Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out via singular value decomposition on the standardized and centred BLUEs for each environment. A PCA biplot was generated using three packages, tidyverse [36], ggrepel [37] and ggpubr [38], implemented in the R environment (V4.2). The violin plots of different origin groups were generated using ggpubr package. The comparisons among origin groups were carried out using t-test at p < 0.05.

2.7. SNP Genotyping

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping and filtering were similar to the methods described by Vinarao et al. [39], with some modifications. A service provider (Diversity Arrays Technology, Bruce, SA, Australia) carried out SNP genotyping including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction. Briefly, the SNP data were obtained through a genotyping-by-sequencing approach using the diversity arrays technology sequencing platform (DArTSeq). DNA libraries were sequenced using a next-generation sequencing platform (HiSeq 2500, Illumina, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), and the resulting sequences were aligned to the Oryza sativa v7.0 reference genome (https://jgi.doe.gov/, accessed on 1 September 2020) to identify SNPs. SNP genotype data obtained from DArTSeq were processed and quality controlled using the dartr package [40] in the R environment (V4.2). In brief, quality control and filtering for high-quality SNPs included (1) removal of secondaries—the occurrence of multiple SNP loci within a fragment, (2) retention of SNP with call rate ≥ 0.80 and (3) filtering out of SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) of <0.05. The physical base pair position of the first nucleotide in the tagged sequences was used as map positions. Missing SNP genotype information was imputed using random forest imputation of 500 trees carried out in missForest v1.4 [41].

2.8. Genome-Wide Association Study

The linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay between the SNP markers was analysed using squared allele frequency correlation (r2) values with significant p values <0.1 for each pair of loci. The physical distance, which reduced r2 to half of the maximum value, was used as the LD decay rate [42].
The GWASs were conducted by the Genome Association and Prediction Integrated Tool (GAPIT) package in the R environment (V4.2) [43]. Bayesian-information and Linkage-disequilibrium Iteratively Nested Keyway (BLINK) was used to conduct GWAS implemented in GAPIT [44]. Previously, the general linear model and mixed linear model were the major analysis models for GWAS; however, the computation speed of those models is low. In the fixed and random model circulating probability unification model, the iterative association of the fixed effect and random effect models not only can handle large sample size but also can detect massive density markers [45]. The BLINK model not only accelerates computational processes but also demonstrates superior statistical power compared to alternative models [44]. The false discovery rate <0.05 for SNPs was set as the threshold to be considered significant [46,47,48].

2.9. QTL Nomenclature and Identification of Candidate Genes

Significantly associated SNPs occurring within 200 kb of each other were grouped and classified as one QTL, and the value of 200 kb was chosen based on previous estimates of global LD in the rice in general [42,49,50,51]. QTL nomenclature was carried out following the guidelines set by the Gene Nomenclature System for Rice [52]. The QTL names were made qAEV for genomic regions associated with early vigour-related traits in aerobic conditions.
Post QTL analysis was carried out by identification of candidate genes in the promising genomic regions identified in the current study. A total of two QTL associated with early vigour score and mesocotyl length were prioritized for candidate gene analysis. Predicted candidate genes within 200 kb upstream and downstream, similar to previously reported analyses [53,54,55], of each significantly associated QTL were identified using the genome browser of the Rice Genome Annotation Project [56].

3. Results

3.1. Phenotypic Variation of Traits

The average mesocotyl length was 9.7 mm, with the longest genotype Labelle at 37.2 mm when seed was sown at 7 cm depth (Table 1). Most genotypes in the diversity set had a mesocotyl length less than 15 mm (254 genotypes, 84%). The early vigour score ranged from 0.9 to 9.2, 1.7 to 9.9 and 0.8 to 8.2 in FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22, respectively. There were highly significant (p < 0.01) genotypic differences for mesocotyl length, early vigour score and all other early vigour-related traits recorded. Heritability of early vigour-related traits ranged from 0.40 to 0.82. High heritability was particularly observed for mesocotyl length in GH18, early vigour score in FIELD20 and plant height across three experiments.
PCA revealed that the first and second principal components accounted for 48.0% and 10.9% of the total variation (Figure 1). The early vigour score of three field experiments was significantly correlated (r = 0.45 ** to 0.54 **, Table S1). More vigorous genotypes had shorter days to emergence and higher light interception, plant height and biomass in the field. Additionally, genotypes with longer mesocotyl length were taller, had greater biomass and fewer days to emergence in the glasshouse. Mesocotyl length in the glasshouse experiment was negatively correlated with early vigour score in the field (r = −0.35 ** to −0.38 **).
The rice genotypes from different origins were compared for mesocotyl length and early vigour score (Figure 2). Compared to Australian genotypes with a mean at 7.9 mm, the American and European genotypes had significantly longer mesocotyl lengths with means at 11.8 mm and 11.0 mm, respectively (Figure 2A). The Australian genotypes were the least vigorous among the origins (Figure 2B–D).

3.2. Population Structure

The number of SNPs ranged from 322 in chromosome 9 to 1084 in chromosome 1, with an average of 584 markers. The SNP marker density was 49 kb on average (Figure 3). LD dropped to half of its initial value at 105 kb in the current germplasm (Figure S1). With the average inter-marker distance of 49 kb, such marker density provides reasonable power to identify genetic variants associated with target traits, even though the causal variant was not queried.
In the PCA of the genotype data, the principal components 1, 2 and 3 accounted for 24.88%, 10.78% and 4.75%, respectively (Figure 4A). The result of PCA with separation based on geographic location is presented in Figure 4B.

3.3. GWAS

A total of 35 SNPs associated with early vigour and related traits were detected across five experiments, and in total 32 QTL were identified (Table 2). The SNPs are located in all chromosomes except chromosomes 10 and 12. The minor allele frequencies (MAF) of those SNPs were from 0.06 to 0.48. In total, there were 18, 5, 2, 13 and 5 SNPs in GH18, GH21, FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22, respectively. The phenotypic variance explained (PVE) of each SNP was from 1.33% to 42.02%. The SNP with the highest PVE was SNP 7_24657049, which was associated with days to emergence in GH21.
It was noticeable that two QTL, qAEV1.5 and qAEV8, were both significantly associated with mesocotyl length in GH18 and early vigour score in FIELD20 (Figure 5). qAEV1.5 explained 8.59% and 9.98% of the phenotype variance for mesocotyl length and early vigour score, respectively. qAEV8 explained 1.53%, 7.91% and 22.05% of the phenotype variance for mesocotyl length, early vigour score and biomass m−2 in FIELD20, respectively. Additionally, on chromosome 1, SNP 1_32510801 was significantly associated with early vigour score in FIELD19 and plant height in PH18. The SNP 1_32510801 was also co-located with SNP 1_32499722, which was associated with early vigour score in FIELD22. These two SNPs were classified within one QTL qAEV1.2. The QTL on chromosome 1 qAEV1.3, including SNP 1_34429355 and SNP 1_34600584, were significantly associated with days to emergence in FIELD20 and plant height in GH18. The SNP 1_38847713 on chromosome 1 associated with plant height was repeatedly detected in the two experiments GH21 and FIELD20. On chromosome 3, the SNP 3_1248008 was significantly associated with plant height and seedling biomass in GH18. The SNP 4_12046452 was detected to be associated with light interception in FIELD20 and plant height in GH21. The SNP with the second highest PVE at 36.33% was SNP 6_21702460, which was associated with plant height, and the SNP was also associated with early vigour score in FIELD22. In total, eight QTL, qAEV1.2, qAEV1.3, qAEV1.5, qAEV1.6, qAEV3.1, qAEV4.3, qAEV6.1 and qAEV8, were detected in multiple traits across different experiments. The remaining QTL were identified for only one trait in one experiment.
There were 8 QTL associated with mesocotyl length in GH18. On average, Australian genotypes had 3.6 positive alleles that promoted mesocotyl elongation, which was significantly lower than American, African and European genotypes (Figure 6A). In both FIELD20 (Figure 6C) and FIELD22 (Figure 6D), the American, African and European genotypes had significantly more positive alleles associated with early vigour score compared to Australian genotypes.

3.4. Identification of Candidate Genes

The two QTL qAEV1.5 and qAEV8 were found to be consistently associated with both mesocotyl length and early vigour score and were further dissected for identification of candidate genes.
Within the qAEV1.5 region, multiple genes were identified with distinct functional roles (Table 3). LOC_Os01g62460 has sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activity and has potential roles in plant growth and development. LOC_Os01g62480 and LOC_Os01g62600 are both laccase precursor proteins, and the two genes have implications in morphological traits (xylem structure, cell wall and cell length) and leaf development under direct-sown and drought conditions, respectively. LOC_Os01g62500 is the OsFtsH3 FtsH protease, which targets mitochondria and is involved in seed germination through arginine metabolism. LOC_Os01g62570 encodes a putative ATP/GTP/Ca++ binding protein and is implicated in cell growth and post-embryonic development. The homeodomain protein encoded by LOC_Os01g62920 delves into plant hormone regulations. LOC_Os01g62610 encodes a peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase of the FKBP type. FKBP gene is involved in hormone signalling, plant growth and development and stress response. The gene LOC_Os01g62800 encodes methyltransferase, and the methyltransferase gene family is related to the seed vigour index. LOC_Os01g62810 and LOC_Os01g62840 emphasize cellular processes and growth regulations. LOC_Os01g62514, LOC_Os01g62660, LOC_Os01g62630, LOC_Os01g62900, LOC_Os01g62760 and LOC_Os01g63010 are involved in drought response in plants.
Within qAEV8, LOC_Os08g16260 and LOC_Os08g16320 both encode for a putative cytochrome P450 protein. Cytochrome P450 proteins are associated with the regulation of cell size in the embryo and the process of apoptosis in the endosperm. LOC_Os08g16480 encodes for a protein containing an ATPase. ATPase has roles associated with germination percentage and seedling growth, particularly affecting root and shoot length. LOC_Os08g16600 encodes for a putative WD-40 repeat protein. The WD-40 gene family is known for the roles in signal transduction and the regulation of hormone-controlled plant cell division. LOC_Os08g16570 expresses a gene of notable importance in drought resistance.

4. Discussion

4.1. Genotypic Variation and Relationship of Traits

The success of cultivating direct-seeded aerobic rice is largely dependent on the early stages of plant growth, with mesocotyl length and early vigour being key factors. The current study examined a japonica diversity set in field and glasshouse conditions. The genotypic variation among the diversity set was high for early vigour-related traits, while significant relationships existed among those traits. Several studies have also observed a highly significant genotypic difference in early vigour traits. Redona and Mackill [76] found highly significant differences in emergence index (a scale that favours both early emergence and a high percentage emergence), early vigour score and shoot weight at 35 DAS among 27 rice varieties in the field, with the field vigour score highly correlated with the emergence index (r = 0.50**) and dry weight (r = 0.59**) of direct-seeded rice. According to Krishna et al. [77], who evaluated early seedling vigour of dry direct-seeded rice 30 DAS in the field, there was significant variation for plant height, biomass and vigour index, and there were significant positive correlations between vigour index in relation to plant height and total biomass (r = 0.44**, r = 0.50**). The current study was one of the foremost in utilizing a japonica diversity set in the aerobic rice system. The large variation among different traits could be exploited further for the genetic studies for the diversity set. Additionally, significant correlations were indicative that there could be the potential for common QTL controlling multiple traits in aerobic conditions. By utilizing a diverse panel in this study, the genetic architecture of early vigour-related traits was further explored.

4.2. GWAS Analysis

There were two important QTL associated with both early vigour score and mesocotyl length under aerobic conditions in the current study. Of the two QTL, qAEV1.5 was found to overlap with the reported qSV1d, which was associated with seedling vigour traits such as plant height and aboveground dry weight utilizing the 3K Rice Genome Project under flooded field conditions [24], and qSV1d shared overlapping regions with two other QTL, qAEV1.3 and qAEV1.4, identified in the current study. The other important QTL qAEV8 was collocated with QFML8-1, which was associated with mesocotyl length utilizing the 3K Rice Genome Project under field conditions [27]. Although GWAS had been used by others to determine the genomic regions associated with early vigour and mesocotyl length in rice, this study was one of the first to identify the QTL associated with both early vigour score and mesocotyl length, specifically under aerobic conditions and direct-drill flooded system.
Among the other identified QTL, qAEV1.6, which was associated with plant height in two experiments, was collocated with the reported qPH-1b, which was associated with plant height [78], and qAEV1.6 was only 400 kb in distance from the sd-1 gene, which was a pivotal gene inducing short plant height and high harvest index in rice [79]. The QTL qAEV1.8 associated with early vigour score on chromosome 1 coincided with qSV1e, which was associated with plant height and aboveground dry weight in the field experiments [24]. qAEV3.1 is near OsMADS50, which has been previously shown to have an effect on plant height in rice [80]. Both qAEV3.3 and qAEV4.2 were associated with mesocotyl length and were found to have less than 200 kb of distance from the two SNPs in Wu et al.’s [25] study, which were associated with mesocotyl length SNP315010911 on chromosome 3 and SNP409772335 on chromosome 4, respectively. Two QTL on chromosome 6, qAEV6.1 and qAEV6.2, that were associated with plant height and early vigour score both overlapped with qPH-6, which was associated with plant height using a set of recombinant inbred sister lines from Nei2B and Zhonghui8006 [78].
The genetic relationships among the japonica diversity set revealed that, in general, compared to Australian genotypes, American genotypes had greater mesocotyl elongation and early vigour, and the number of favourable alleles of related QTL were also significantly higher. This indicates the potential influence of specific QTL in enhancing the early vigour-associated traits in American genotypes, making them viable candidates for integration into the breeding programs. It should also be noted that Australian genotypes had moderate frequency of favourable alleles for mesocotyl length and early vigour in the diversity set, and donors could be chosen directly using marker-assisted forward breeding after the establishment of an accurate marker system and validation in the target environment [81].
Genotypes with longer mesocotyl length tended to be more vigorous in both glasshouse and field conditions, which was supported by previous studies [15,82]. However, high-yielding semi-dwarf genotypes tend to have poor establishment under direct seeding, as the semi-dwarfing gene sd-1 has been shown to have a detrimental effect on the expression of plant height and mesocotyl elongation [83]. The lack of sd-1 in rice was associated with a loss in yield, as illustrated by Yoshida et al. [84] and Mathan et al. [85]. Conversely, taller rice genotypes could make rice more competitive in weedy upland conditions and have a better root system, which ensures the plants’ access to essential soil nutrients and water [86]. This relationship between plant height, mesocotyl length and the sd-1 gene underlines the complexity of breeding efforts to optimize yield while ensuring adaptability and resilience to varied planting conditions. Balancing these traits becomes important in developing varieties that can reconcile the need for high yield with the adaptative traits necessary for success in direct-seeding aerobic environments. It was noted that the distance between sd-1 and qAEV1.5 was around 2 Mb, and after validation there is a possibility of pyramiding favourable alleles for mesocotyl elongation and the semi-dwarf gene where aerobic direct-seeding production is the target environment.

4.3. Candidate Genes

For the two important QTL, qAEV1.5 and qAEV8, this study has identified several significant candidate genes within the detected QTL, each contributing distinct roles to plant growth and development, especially under direct-sown aerobic environments. LOC_Os01g62460 (ZOS1-16-C2H2 zinc finger protein) and LOC_Os01g62514 (WRKY56) are sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factors. Both the C2H2 zinc finger proteins and WRKY gene family are pivotal in plant growth and development and are implicated in drought tolerance adaptation and the enhancement of root thickness, which were critical for optimized performance under more challenging conditions such as the aerobic production system [26,60]. The revelation of laccase precursor proteins, LOC_Os01g62480 and LOC_Os01g62600, induces cellular and structural adaptations in response to environmental variation, potentially guiding enhancements in plant resilience and adaptability under direct-sown and drought conditions [58,61]. The FKBP-type gene LOC_Os01g62610 is reported to be indicative of the regulation of hormone signalling essential for plant growth, development, stress response and seed germination [62]. The two candidate genes LOC_Os01g62660 (MYB family transcription factor) and LOC_Os01g62920 (homeodomain protein) are both implicated in drought response, with the latter being particularly involved in plant hormone regulations including auxin, ABA, cytokinin and GA, which were crucial in the developmental processes [23,64].
Additionally, the examination of the qAEV8 candidate gene underscores the potential significance of cytochrome P450 proteins, encoded by LOC_Os08g16260 and LOC_Os08g16320, in mediating cellular processes within the embryo and directing apoptosis in the endosperm [73]. The ATPases encoded by LOC_Os08g16480 have an implication in seedling growth and germination percentage, particularly in root and shoot lengths, and emerge as focal points for understanding the initial establishment of plants and subsequent growth dynamics [74]. LOC_Os08g16600 (WD-40 repeat protein family) is implicated in signal transduction and hormone-controlled plant cell division, which are central processes in the regulation of plant growth and development [68].
In order to understand the potential impact of the identified QTL and candidate genes on aerobic rice production, further studies could be conducted to assess the effect on important traits such as yield and grain quality. This validation would provide insight into whether yield and quality traits could be improved by targeting the identified QTL and candidate genes. Additionally, validation of the identified QTL and candidate genes in other genetic backgrounds is crucial to ensure the stability and reliability before adopting it into rice breeding programs. Once validated, these putative QTL and candidate genes could be used to select donors with favourable alleles for early vigour and related traits and can also be used for mark-assisted selection for an aerobic rice breeding program.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study quantified the existence of genetic variation in early vigour-related traits, and this information can now be exploited by the Australian rice breeding program to improve plant establishment, particularly from depths using deep sowing, under direct seeding. Through genome-wide association analysis, this study identified two important QTL, qAEV1.5 and qAEV8, which were both associated with early vigour score and mesocotyl length in rice. Between the two highlighted QTL, a total of 23 candidate genes were identified, most of which have been previously reported to be related to developmental regulation and stress adaptational mechanisms in various environmental conditions, further supporting their potential involvement in the adaption to direct seeding under aerobic conditions. The existence of genotypic variation and genomic regions for early vigour-related traits suggests that there is scope within the breeding program to improve the establishment of drill-direct-seeded aerobic rice, particularly when sown at depth, by exploiting the genotypes and QTL related to longer mesocotyl and greater early vigour. Further exploration into the relationship of plant height, sd-1 gene, early vigour-related traits and mesocotyl length becomes essential for potential pyramiding of the favourable alleles after validation in target production environments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13040261/s1, Table S1: The correlation matrix between mesocotyl length (ML), early vigour score (EVS), plant height (PH), days to emergence (DTE), biomass per plant (Biomass PP), biomass per m−2 and light interception (LI) in two glasshouse experiments (GH18 and GH21) and three field experiments (FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22); Figure S1: Linkage disequilibrium (R square) decay of marker pairs over all chromosomes for the population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.G., C.P., R.V., S.F. and J.M.; methodology, W.G. and C.P.; software, W.G., C.P. and R.V.; validation, W.G., C.P. and R.V.; formal analysis, W.G., C.P. and R.V.; investigation, W.G.; data curation, W.G.; writing—original draft preparation, W.G.; writing—review and editing, W.G., C.P., R.V., S.F. and J.M.; visualization, W.G.; supervision, C.P., S.F. and J.M; project administration, J.M.; funding acquisition, J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by AgriFutures under project number: PRJ-011067.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the University of Queensland’s Crop Research Unit and Central Glasshouse Services for their technical support. We also wish to thank the NSW Department of Primary Industries for supplying the germplasm.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dunn, B.; Dunn, T.; Mitchell, J.; Brinkhoff, J. Effects of plant population and row spacing on grain yield of aerial-sown and drill-sown rice. Crop Pasture Sci. 2020, 71, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lal, B.; Nayak, A.K.; Gautam, P.; Tripathi, R.; Singh, T.; Katara, J. Aerobic rice: A water saving approach for rice production. Int. J. Res. BioSci. 2012, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chamara, B.S.; Marambe, B.; Kumar, V.; Ismail, A.M.; Septiningsih, E.M.; Chauhan, B.S. Optimizing sowing and flooding depth for anaerobic germination-tolerant genotypes to enhance crop establishment, early growth, and weed management in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, e1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Su, X.; Zhan, J.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Wei, Y.; Wu, H.; Dai, H. Development Status of Direct Seeding Rice and Study on Response Mechanism of Submergence. Open Access Libr. J. 2022, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rao, A.; Johnson, D.; Sivaprasad, B.; Ladha, J.; Mortimer, A. Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Adv. Agron. 2007, 93, 153–255. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mahender, A.; Anandan, A.; Pradhan, S.K. Early seedling vigour, an imperative trait for direct-seeded rice: An overview on physio-morphological parameters and molecular markers. Planta 2015, 241, 1027–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Namuco, O.S.; Cairns, J.E.; Johnson, D.E. Investigating early vigour in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.): Part I. Seedling growth and grain yield in competition with weeds. Field Crops Res. 2009, 113, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, J.; Yang, G.; Yang, M.; Su, L.; Xia, A.; Li, D.; Huang, C.; Zhou, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; et al. Quantitative trait locus analysis of seed germination and early seedling growth in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, e1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Huang, M.; Zhang, R.; Chen, J.; Cao, F.; Jiang, L.; Zou, Y. Morphological and physiological traits of seeds and seedlings in two rice cultivars with contrasting early vigor. Plant Prod. Sci. 2017, 20, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ros, C.; Bell, R.; White, P. Seedling vigour and the early growth of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Soil 2003, 252, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, Z.; Chang, T.-G.; Chen, F.; Zhao, H.; Song, Q.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhou, S.-C.; et al. Morphological and physiological factors contributing to early vigor in the elite rice cultivar 9311. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ward, R. Rice Growing Guide; NSW Department of Primary Industries: Orange, NSW, Australia, 2021.
  13. Zhan, J.; Lu, X.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Q.; Ye, G. Mesocotyl elongation, an essential trait for dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review of physiological and genetic basis. Planta 2019, 251, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, H.-S.; Sasaki, K.; Kang, J.-W.; Sato, T.; Song, W.-Y.; Ahn, S.-N. Mesocotyl elongation is essential for seedling emergence under deep-seeding condition in rice. Rice 2017, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ohno, H.; Banayo, N.P.M.C.; Bueno, C.S.; Kashiwagi, J.-i.; Nakashima, T.; Corales, A.M.; Garcia, R.; Sandhu, N.; Kumar, A.; Kato, Y. Longer mesocotyl contributes to quick seedling establishment, improved root anchorage, and early vigor of deep-sown rice. Field Crops Res. 2018, 228, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Z.-H.; Yu, S.-B.; Yu, T.; Huang, Z.; Zhu, Y.-G. Mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for seedling-vigor using recombinant inbred lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Field Crops Res. 2005, 91, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cairns, J.; Namuco, O.; Torres, R.; Simborio, F.; Courtois, B.; Aquino, G.; Johnson, D. Investigating early vigour in upland rice (Oryza Sativa L.): Part ii. Identification of QTLs controlling early vigour under greenhouse and field conditions. Field Crops Res. 2009, 113, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, U.M.; Yadav, S.; Dixit, S.; Ramayya, P.J.; Devi, M.N.; Raman, K.A.; Kumar, A. QTL hotspots for early vigor and related traits under dry direct-seeded system in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, e286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lu, X.; Niu, A.; Cai, H.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Z. Genetic dissection of seedling and early vigor in a recombinant inbred line population of rice. Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, H.-S.; Sasaki, K.; Higashitani, A.; Ahn, S.-N.; Sato, T. Mapping and characterization of quantitative trait loci for mesocotyl elongation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice 2012, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Huang, C.; Jiang, S.-K.; Feng, L.-L.; Xu, Z.-J.; Chen, W.-F. Analysis of QTLs for mesocotyl length in rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Acta Agron. Sin. 2010, 36, 1108–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zeng, M.; Yang, J.; Wu, K.; Wang, H.; Sun, K.; Chen, Z.; Guo, T.; Chen, C. Genome-wide association study reveals early seedling vigour-associated quantitative trait loci in indica rice. Euphytica 2021, 217, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, F.; Longkumer, T.; Catausan, S.C.; Calumpang, C.L.F.; Tarun, J.A.; Cattin-Ortola, J.; Ishizaki, T.; Pariasca Tanaka, J.; Rose, T.; Wissuwa, M.; et al. Genome-wide association and gene validation studies for early root vigour to improve direct seeding of rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 2731–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, K.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, C.-C.; Liu, Z.-X.; Jiang, Y.-J.; Zhai, L.-Y.; Zheng, T.-Q.; Xu, J.-L.; Li, Z.-K. Genetic dissection of seedling vigour in a diverse panel from the 3000 rice (Oryza sativa L.) genome project. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, J.; Feng, F.; Lian, X.; Teng, X.; Wei, H.; Yu, H.; Xie, W.; Yan, M.; Fan, P.; Li, Y.; et al. Genome-wide association Study (GWAS) of mesocotyl elongation based on re-sequencing approach in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, H.; Zhan, J.; Li, J.; Lu, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Ye, G. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) for mesocotyl elongation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under multiple culture conditions. Genes 2020, 11, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhao, Y.; Zhao, W.; Jiang, C.; Wang, X.; Xiong, H.; Todorovska, E.G.; Yin, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Xie, J.; et al. Genetic architecture and candidate genes for deep-sowing tolerance in rice revealed by Non-syn GWAS. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, e332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Coombes, N. DiGGer: DiGGer Design Generator under Correlation and Blocking; NSW DPI Biometrics: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2009.
  29. Butler, D.; Cullis, B. On Model Based Design of Comparative Experiments in R; National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, University of Wollongong: Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  30. Isbell, R.; National Committee on Soil and Terrain. The Australian Soil Classification; CSIRO Publishing: Clayton, VIC, USA, 2021.
  31. Buxton, J.W.; Jia, W. A controlled water table irrigation system for hydroponic lettuce production. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Growing Media and Hydroponics, Kassandra, Greece, 31 August–6 September 1999; pp. 281–288. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hunter, M.; Mitchell, J.; Dieters, M. Semi-automated, non-weighing, pot-in-bucket (PIB), water management in pot plant culture. In Proceedings of the 16th Australian Agronomy Conference, Armidale, NSW, Australia, 14–18 October 2012. [Google Scholar]
  33. IRRI. Standard Evaluation System for Rice; International Rice Research Institute: Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  34. Butler, D.; Cullis, B.R.; Gilmour, A.; Gogel, B. ASReml-R Reference Manual; The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries Fisheries: Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 2009.
  35. Isik, F.; Holland, J.; Maltecca, C. Genetic Data Analysis for Plant and Animal Breeding; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; Volume 400. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wickham, H.; Averick, M.; Bryan, J.; Chang, W.; McGowan, L.D.A.; François, R.; Grolemund, G.; Hayes, A.; Henry, L.; Hester, J.; et al. tidyverse: Easily install and load the ‘tidyverse’. J. Open Source Softw. 2019, 4, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Slowikowski, K. ggrepel: Automatically Position Non-Overlapping Text Labels with ‘ggplot2’. 2020. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggrepel/index.html (accessed on 1 April 2023).
  38. Kassambara, A. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plots. 2020. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggpubr/index.html (accessed on 1 April 2023).
  39. Vinarao, R.; Proud, C.; Zhang, X.; Snell, P.; Fukai, S.; Mitchell, J. Stable and Novel Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Confer Narrow Root Cone Angle in an Aerobic Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Production System. Rice 2021, 14, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gruber, B.; Unmack, P.J.; Berry, O.F.; Georges, A. dartr: An r package to facilitate analysis of SNP data generated from reduced representation genome sequencing. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2018, 18, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Stekhoven, D. missForest: Nonparametric Missing Value Imputation Using Random Forest, R Package Version 1.5. 2022. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/missForest/index.html (accessed on 1 April 2023).
  42. Huang, X.; Wei, X.; Sang, T.; Zhao, Q.; Feng, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, C.; Zhu, C.; Lu, T.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lipka, A.E.; Tian, F.; Wang, Q.; Peiffer, J.; Li, M.; Bradbury, P.J.; Gore, M.A.; Buckler, E.S.; Zhang, Z. GAPIT: Genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2397–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huang, M.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Summers, R.M.; Zhang, Z. BLINK: A package for the next level of genome-wide association studies with both individuals and markers in the millions. Gigascience 2019, 8, giy154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, X.; Huang, M.; Fan, B.; Buckler, E.S.; Zhang, Z. Iterative usage of fixed and random effect models for powerful and efficient genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Teklemariam, S.S.; Bayissa, K.N.; Matros, A.; Pillen, K.; Ordon, F.; Wehner, G. Genome wide association study of Ethiopian barley for terminal drought stress tolerance under field and climate chamber conditions. Cereal Res. Commun. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Volante, A.; Tondelli, A.; Desiderio, F.; Abbruscato, P.; Menin, B.; Biselli, C.; Casella, L.; Singh, N.; McCouch, S.R.; Tharreau, D.; et al. Genome wide association studies for japonica rice resistance to blast in field and controlled conditions. Rice 2020, 13, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ming, L.; Fu, D.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, H.; Xu, X.; Xu, T.; Xiong, X.; Li, M.; Zheng, Y.; Li, G.; et al. Transcriptome-wide association analyses reveal the impact of regulatory variants on rice panicle architecture and causal gene regulatory networks. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Norton, G.J.; Douglas, A.; Lahner, B.; Yakubova, E.; Guerinot, M.L.; Pinson, S.R.M.; Tarpley, L.; Eizenga, G.C.; McGrath, S.P.; Zhao, F.-J.; et al. Genome wide association mapping of grain arsenic, copper, molybdenum and zinc in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown at four international field sites. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yu, J.; Zhao, W.; Tong, W.; He, Q.; Yoon, M.-Y.; Li, F.-P.; Choi, B.; Heo, E.-B.; Kim, K.-W.; Park, Y.-J. A genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes related to salt tolerance in rice (Oryza Sativa) at the germination stage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhao, J.; Yang, W.; Zhang, S.; Yang, T.; Liu, Q.; Dong, J.; Fu, H.; Mao, X.; Liu, B. Genome-wide association study and candidate gene analysis of rice cadmium accumulation in grain in a diverse rice collection. Rice 2018, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. McCouch, S.R. Gene Nomenclature System for Rice. Rice 2008, 1, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, Y.; Xiang, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Cai, D.; Huang, Y.; Mao, D.; Fu, J.; Chen, L. ABA biosynthesis gene OsNCED3 contributes to preharvest sprouting resistance and grain development in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 46, 1384–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lar, S.M.; Seo, J.; Jang, S.-G.; Zhang, H.; Lee, A.-R.; Cao, F.-Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, N.-E.; Lee, Y.; Park, Y.-J.; et al. Genome-wide association study for detecting salt-tolerance loci and candidate genes in rice. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Babu, P.M.; Neeraja, C.N.; Rathod, S.; Suman, K.; Uttam, G.A.; Chakravartty, N.; Lachagari, V.B.R.; Chaitanya, U.; Rao, L.V.S.; Voleti, S.R. Stable SNP allele associations with high hrain zinc content in polished rice (Oryza sativa L.) identified based on ddRAD sequencing. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, e763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. RGAP. Rice Genome Annotation Project. Available online: https://rice.uga.edu/cgi-bin/gbrowse/rice (accessed on 5 December 2022).
  57. Liu, Y.; Khan, A.R.; Gan, Y. C2H2 zinc finger proteins response to abiotic stress in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kumar, D.; Ramkumar, M.K.; Dutta, B.; Kumar, A.; Pandey, R.; Jain, P.K.; Gaikwad, K.; Mishra, D.C.; Chaturvedi, K.K.; Rai, A.; et al. Integration of miRNA dynamics and drought tolerant QTLs in rice reveals the role of miR2919 in drought stress response. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Taylor, N.L.; Howell, K.A.; Heazlewood, J.L.; Tan, T.Y.W.; Narsai, R.; Huang, S.; Whelan, J.; Millar, A.H. Analysis of the Rice Mitochondrial Carrier Family Reveals Anaerobic Accumulation of a Basic Amino Acid Carrier Involved in Arginine Metabolism during Seed Germination. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jiang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yu, D. Heterologous expression of AtWRKY57 confers drought tolerance in Oryza sativa. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, e145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kumar, S.; Kumar, S.; Krishnan, G.S.; Mohapatra, T. Molecular basis of genetic plasticity to varying environmental conditions on growing rice by dry/direct-sowing and exposure to drought stress: Insights for DSR varietal development. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, e1013207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yadav, A.K.; Kumar, A.; Grover, N.; Ellur, R.K.; Bollinedi, H.; Krishnan, S.G.; Bhowmick, P.K.; Vinod, K.K.; Nagarajan, M.; Singh, A.K. Genome-wide association study reveals marker–trait associations for early vegetative stage salinity tolerance in rice. Plants 2021, 10, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Karnatam, K.S.; Jaganathan, D.; Dilip, K.R.; N, M.B.; Muthurajan, R. Shortlisting putative candidate genes underlying qDTY1.1, a major effect drought tolerant QTL in rice Oryza sativa L. Electron. J. Plant Breed. 2020, 11, 916–924. Available online: https://www.ejplantbreeding.org/index.php/EJPB/article/view/3651 (accessed on 1 April 2023).
  64. Li, H.; Yue, H.; Xie, J.; Bu, J.; Li, L.; Xin, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; Wang, J.; et al. Transcriptomic profiling of the high-vigour maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid variety response to cold and drought stresses during seed germination. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Catusse, J.; Meinhard, J.; Job, C.; Strub, J.-M.; Fischer, U.; Pestsova, E.; Westhoff, P.; Van Dorsselaer, A.; Job, D. Proteomics reveals potential biomarkers of seed vigor in sugarbeet. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1569–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chauhan, H.S.; Muthusamy, V.; Rashmi, T.; Basu, S.; Anand, A.; Mehta, B.K.; Gain, N.; Zunjare, R.U.; Singh, A.K.; Gupta, H.S.; et al. Characterization of crtRB1- and vte4-based biofortified sweet corn inbreds for seed vigour and physico-biochemical traits. J. Appl. Genet. 2022, 63, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Misra, G.; Joshi-Saha, A. Genetic mapping and transcriptome profiling of a chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) mutant identifies a novel locus (CaEl) regulating organ size and early vigor. Plant J. 2023, 116, 1401–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kumar, R.; Mustafiz, A.; Sahoo, K.K.; Sharma, V.; Samanta, S.; Sopory, S.K.; Pareek, A.; Singla-Pareek, S.L. Functional screening of cDNA library from a salt tolerant rice genotype Pokkali identifies mannose-1-phosphate guanyl transferase gene (OsMPG1) as a key member of salinity stress response. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 79, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sircar, S.; Parekh, N. Meta-analysis of drought-tolerant genotypes in Oryza sativa: A network-based approach. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Yoo, Y.-H.; Nalini Chandran, A.K.; Park, J.-C.; Gho, Y.-S.; Lee, S.-W.; An, G.; Jung, K.-H. OsPhyB-mediating novel regulatory pathway for drought tolerance in rice root identified by a global RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis of rice genes in response to water deficiencies. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, e580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Durand, T.C.; Cueff, G.; Godin, B.; Valot, B.; Clément, G.; Gaude, T.; Rajjou, L. Combined proteomic and metabolomic profiling of the Arabidopsis thaliana vps29 mutant reveals pleiotropic functions of the retromer in seed development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, W.; Huang, J.; Yan, X.; Yao, W.; Ouyang, J.; Li, S. Inositolphosphorylceramide synthases, OsIPCSs, regulate plant height in rice. Plant Sci. 2023, 335, 111798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ren, D.; Ding, C.; Qian, Q. Molecular bases of rice grain size and quality for optimized productivity. Sci. Bull. 2023, 68, 314–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mukherjee, J.; Mukherji, S.; Sircar, S.M. High temperature—Induced changes in germination, seedling vigour and the metabolic activities in rice seeds. Biol. Plant. 1973, 15, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Punchkhon, C.; Plaimas, K.; Buaboocha, T.; Siangliw, J.L.; Toojinda, T.; Comai, L.; De Diego, N.; Spíchal, L.; Chadchawan, S. Drought-tolerance gene identification using genome comparison and co-expression network analysis of chromosome substitution lines in rice. Genes 2020, 11, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Redona, E.; Mackill, D. Genetic variation for seedling vigor traits in rice. Crop Sci. 1996, 36, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Krishna, G.R.; Rani, A.R.; Reddy, B.V. Genetic variability for early rice seedling vigour in AF 3 population of BPT5204/IR88633-1-136-B2 under dry direct seeded condition. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Res. 2015, 5, 337–346. [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang, H.; Yang, Q.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhan, X.; Cao, L.; Cheng, S.; Wu, W.; Zhang, Y. Finding stable QTL for plant height in super hybrid rice. Agriculture 2022, 12, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Spielmeyer, W.; Ellis, M.H.; Chandler, P.M. Semidwarf (sd-1), green revolution rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9043–9048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Han, J.-J.; Han, M.-J.; An, G. Functional analyses of the flowering time gene OSMADS50, the putative suppressor of overexpression of CO 1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in rice. Plant J. 2004, 38, 754–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cobb, J.N.; Biswas, P.S.; Platten, J.D. Back to the future: Revisiting MAS as a tool for modern plant breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 647–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xiong, Q.; Ma, B.; Lu, X.; Huang, Y.-H.; He, S.-J.; Yang, C.; Yin, C.-C.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, W.-K. Ethylene-inhibited jasmonic acid biosynthesis promotes mesocotyl/coleoptile elongation of etiolated rice seedlings. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1053–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ishiyama, K.; Saito, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Khush, G.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M. Green revolution: A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nat. Commun. 2002, 416, 701702. [Google Scholar]
  84. Yoshida, S.; Bhattacharjee, D.; Cabuslay, G. Relationship between plant type and root growth in rice. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1982, 28, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mathan, J.; Bhattacharya, J.; Ranjan, A. Enhancing crop yield by optimizing plant developmental features. Development 2016, 143, 3283–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dass, A.; Shekhawat, K.; Choudhary, A.K.; Sepat, S.; Rathore, S.S.; Mahajan, G.; Chauhan, B.S. Weed management in rice using crop competition—A review. Crop Prot. 2017, 95, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Principal component analysis biplot for the first two principal components for mesocotyl length (ML), early vigour score (EVS), plant height (PH), days to emergence (DTE), biomass and light interception (LI) in two glasshouse experiments (GH18 and GH21) and three field experiments (FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22), highlighting the origins in different colours.
Figure 1. Principal component analysis biplot for the first two principal components for mesocotyl length (ML), early vigour score (EVS), plant height (PH), days to emergence (DTE), biomass and light interception (LI) in two glasshouse experiments (GH18 and GH21) and three field experiments (FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22), highlighting the origins in different colours.
Biology 13 00261 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of genotypic origins for (A) mesocotyl length in glasshouse experiment (GH18) and early vigour score (1 is most vigorous) in field experiment in (B) season 2018–2019 (FIELD19), (C) season 2019–2020 (FIELD20) and (D) season 2021–2022 (FIELD22) between Australia and different origins. Significance levels between Australian genotypes and other origins were displayed on the top of each figure: ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001. The mean of each trait for each origin is displayed below the significance level. The diamonds within each boxplot are the mean of each trait for each region.
Figure 2. Comparison of genotypic origins for (A) mesocotyl length in glasshouse experiment (GH18) and early vigour score (1 is most vigorous) in field experiment in (B) season 2018–2019 (FIELD19), (C) season 2019–2020 (FIELD20) and (D) season 2021–2022 (FIELD22) between Australia and different origins. Significance levels between Australian genotypes and other origins were displayed on the top of each figure: ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001. The mean of each trait for each origin is displayed below the significance level. The diamonds within each boxplot are the mean of each trait for each region.
Biology 13 00261 g002
Figure 3. Graphical genotype of 7507 SNP markers detected in the japonica rice diversity set.
Figure 3. Graphical genotype of 7507 SNP markers detected in the japonica rice diversity set.
Biology 13 00261 g003
Figure 4. (A) Total variance of each principal component of genotype data. (B) The three principal components (PCs) capturing the variation in genotypes in the japonica diversity set in a principal components analysis 3D plot of genotype data. Colours represent origin of genetic material.
Figure 4. (A) Total variance of each principal component of genotype data. (B) The three principal components (PCs) capturing the variation in genotypes in the japonica diversity set in a principal components analysis 3D plot of genotype data. Colours represent origin of genetic material.
Biology 13 00261 g004
Figure 5. The Manhattan plot of association study of mesocotyl length (ML) in an aerobic glasshouse experiment (GH18) and early vigour score (EVS) in an aerobic field experiment (FIELD20). qAEV1.5 and qAEV8 were two quantitative trait loci (QTL) on chromosome 1 and chromosome 8 for early vigour traits. Green line represents threshold of false discovery rate p < 0.05.
Figure 5. The Manhattan plot of association study of mesocotyl length (ML) in an aerobic glasshouse experiment (GH18) and early vigour score (EVS) in an aerobic field experiment (FIELD20). qAEV1.5 and qAEV8 were two quantitative trait loci (QTL) on chromosome 1 and chromosome 8 for early vigour traits. Green line represents threshold of false discovery rate p < 0.05.
Biology 13 00261 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of genotypic origins for the number of positive alleles associated with (A) mesocotyl length in glasshouse experiment (GH18) and early vigour score in field experiment in (B) season 2018–2019 (FIELD19), (C) season 2019–2020 (FIELD20) and (D) season 2021–2022 (FIELD22) between Australia and different origins. Significance levels between Australian genotypes and other origins were displayed on the top of each figure: ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001. The average number of positive alleles of each origin were displayed below the significance level. The diamonds within each boxplot are the average number of positive alleles of each trait for each region of origin.
Figure 6. Comparison of genotypic origins for the number of positive alleles associated with (A) mesocotyl length in glasshouse experiment (GH18) and early vigour score in field experiment in (B) season 2018–2019 (FIELD19), (C) season 2019–2020 (FIELD20) and (D) season 2021–2022 (FIELD22) between Australia and different origins. Significance levels between Australian genotypes and other origins were displayed on the top of each figure: ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001. The average number of positive alleles of each origin were displayed below the significance level. The diamonds within each boxplot are the average number of positive alleles of each trait for each region of origin.
Biology 13 00261 g006
Table 1. The mean, maximum and minimum values, heritability, least significant difference (LSD) in mesocotyl length, early vigour score, plant height, days to emergence, biomass per plant, biomass per m2 and light interception in two glasshouse experiments (GH18 and GH21) and three field experiments (FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22).
Table 1. The mean, maximum and minimum values, heritability, least significant difference (LSD) in mesocotyl length, early vigour score, plant height, days to emergence, biomass per plant, biomass per m2 and light interception in two glasshouse experiments (GH18 and GH21) and three field experiments (FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22).
TraitExperimentMeanMaximumMinimumHeritabilityLSD
Mesocotyl length (mm)GH189.737.21.60.8224.7
Early vigour scoreFIELD194.89.20.90.572
FIELD205.89.91.70.752.1
FIELD224.78.20.80.652
Plant height (cm)GH1814.334.81.40.8011.2
FIELD2029.647.012.80.826.7
GH2144.160.524.30.758.5
Days to emergenceGH18101640.425
FIELD20101680.782
GH2151030.402
Biomass per plant (mg)GH1812.132.50.70.7510.0
Biomass per m2 (g m−2)FIELD2070.5196.413.50.6447.3
Light interception (%)FIELD20317450.5618
Table 2. The quantitative trait loci (QTL, bold letters were QTL associated with multiple traits), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), chromosome (Chr.), position (Pos.), p value, minor allele frequency (MAF), SNP effect and phenotype variance explained (PVE) associated with days to heading (DTE), early vigour score (EVS), light interception (LI), biomass (mg), biomass m2 (g m−2), mesocotyl length (ML, cm) and plant height (PH, cm) in two aerobic glasshouse experiments (GH18, GH21) and three aerobic field experiments (FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22) using the japonica diversity set.
Table 2. The quantitative trait loci (QTL, bold letters were QTL associated with multiple traits), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), chromosome (Chr.), position (Pos.), p value, minor allele frequency (MAF), SNP effect and phenotype variance explained (PVE) associated with days to heading (DTE), early vigour score (EVS), light interception (LI), biomass (mg), biomass m2 (g m−2), mesocotyl length (ML, cm) and plant height (PH, cm) in two aerobic glasshouse experiments (GH18, GH21) and three aerobic field experiments (FIELD19, FIELD20 and FIELD22) using the japonica diversity set.
QTLTrait and ExperimentSNPChr.Pos.p ValueMAFEffectPVE
qAEV1.1EVS FIELD191_630444116,304,4411.91 × 10−80.36−0.4111.76
qAEV1.2EVS FIELD221_32499722132,499,7229.70 × 10−80.13−0.518.65
EVS FIELD191_32510801132,510,8019.94 × 10−70.14−0.4221.44
PH GH211_32510801132,510,8015.99 × 10−90.142.207.61
qAEV1.3DTE FIELD201_34429355134,429,3555.06 × 10−60.140.629.73
PH GH181_34600584134,600,5844.33 × 10−90.0927.1222.92
qAEV1.4LI FIELD201_35998551135,998,5513.73 × 10−80.11−0.067.29
qAEV1.5EVS FIELD201_36358593136,358,5936.10 × 10−80.110.659.98
ML GH181_36358593136,358,5938.48 × 10−110.11−3.048.59
qAEV1.6PH GH211_38847713138,847,7131.78 × 10−100.20−2.237.61
PH FIELD201_38847713138,847,7137.90 × 10−80.21−18.715.01
qAEV1.7Biomass GH181_40490610140,490,6107.44 × 10−70.11−1.745.67
Biomass GH181_40527461140,527,4611.96 × 10−70.41−1.273.23
qAEV1.8EVS FIELD201_42422994142,422,9943.68 × 10−80.06−0.8817.41
qAEV2.1Biomass GH182_271363522,713,6351.46 × 10−60.111.494.42
qAEV2.2PH GH212_654352826,543,5283.20 × 10−70.12−1.996.01
qAEV2.3DTE FIELD202_30871430230,871,4301.36 × 10−60.080.7922.37
qAEV3.1PH GH183_124800831,248,0088.33 × 10−110.4417.787.35
Biomass GH183_124800831,248,0085.00 × 10−90.441.303.42
qAEV3.2DTE GH183_13599473313,599,4731.24 × 10−80.43−0.668.74
qAEV3.3ML GH183_15001141315,001,1412.72 × 10−70.471.591.77
qAEV4.1Biomass GH184_441806144,418,0617.89 × 10−70.391.172.71
qAEV4.2ML GH184_966996549,669,9653.08 × 10−70.073.755.82
qAEV4.3LI FIELD204_12046452412,046,4525.27 × 10−80.480.048.94
PH GH214_12046452412,046,4521.27 × 10−80.471.423.12
qAEV4.4DTE GH184_21145795421,145,7953.79 × 10−80.170.949.23
qAEV4.5EVS FIELD224_33718024433,718,0249.43 × 10−70.350.313.53
qAEV5.1EVS FIELD225_14202497514,202,4979.73 × 10−70.48−0.291.92
qAEV5.2PH GH185_27968982527,968,9828.96 × 10−110.18−23.121.44
qAEV6.1PH FIELD206_21702460621,702,4607.16 × 10−80.0733.1836.33
EVS FIELD226_21702460621,702,4601.10 × 10−80.07−0.7416.69
qAEV6.2EVS FIELD226_23451697623,451,6971.01 × 10−60.190.384.19
qAEV6.3LI FIELD206_27996796627,996,7963.48 × 10−70.060.0734.84
qAEV7.1EVS FIELD207_11559181711,559,1812.40 × 10−60.22−0.382.42
qAEV7.2DTE GH217_24657049724,657,0492.43 × 10−70.060.4442.02
qAEV7.3ML GH187_27838498727,838,4986.83 × 10−60.401.271.84
qAEV8Biomass m2 FIELD208_10101994810,101,9945.07 × 10−60.33−7.0322.05
EVS FIELD208_10101994810,101,9943.06 × 10−60.330.467.91
ML GH188_10101994810,101,9941.44 × 10−60.32−1.631.53
qAEV9ML GH189_19288810919,288,8103.96 × 10−60.08−2.407.19
qAEV11.1ML GH1811_4596939114,596,9392.05 × 10−70.351.381.33
qAEV11.2PH FIELD2011_219135771121,913,5774.17 × 10−70.06−24.112.67
qAEV11.3ML GH1811_246667571124,666,7576.07 × 10−60.211.242.70
Table 3. List of candidate genes functionally annotated in the representative quantitative trait loci (QTL).
Table 3. List of candidate genes functionally annotated in the representative quantitative trait loci (QTL).
QTLGeneGene IdentificationGene Ontology Classification
qAEV1.5LOC_Os01g62460ZOS1-16-C2H2 zinc finger proteinSequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activity; C2H2 zinc finger proteins have been shown to be involved in plant growth and development [57]
LOC_Os01g62480Laccase precursor proteinDrought tolerance, xylem structure, cell wall, cell length [58]
LOC_Os01g62500OsFtsH3 FtsH protease, homologue of AtFtsH3/10Targets mitochondria and is involved in arginine metabolism during rice seed germination [59]
LOC_Os01g62514WRKY56Sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activity; WRKY gene family is involved in drought tolerance and root thickness [60]
LOC_Os01g62570ATP/GTP/Ca++ binding proteinCell growth; post-embryonic development
LOC_Os01g62600Laccase precursor proteinCell; response to stress; response to abiotic stimulus; leaf development under direct-sown and drought conditions [61]
LOC_Os01g62610Peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase, FKBP-typeFKBPs gene family regulates hormone signalling in plant growth and development, stress response and seed germination [62]
LOC_Os01g62630Aspartic proteinase nepenthesin precursorCell death; post-embryonic development; embryo development; drought response [63]
LOC_Os01g62660MYB family transcription factorSequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activity; drought response [64]
LOC_Os01g62760Protein phosphatase 2CDrought response; protein phosphatase 2C involved in ABA metabolism [65]
LOC_Os01g62800MethyltransferaseMethyltransferase gene family is related to the seed vigour index [66]
LOC_Os01g62810Regulator of chromosome condensationRegulation of plant organ elongation [67]
LOC_Os01g62840Mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferaseDrought response [63]; mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase regulates chlorophyll retention and seedling growth [68]
LOC_Os01g62900Amino acid kinaseDrought response [69]
LOC_Os01g62920Homeodomain proteinSequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activity; homeodomain protein involved in plant hormone regulation including auxin, ABA, cytokinin and GA [23]
LOC_Os01g62950RAS-related proteinDrought response [70]; cellular component; RAS-related protein responses to ABA, lipid metabolic processes and carbohydrate metabolic processes [71]
LOC_Os01g63010Universal stress protein domain containing proteinRegulates genes under direct-sown and drought stress conditions [61]
LOC_Os01g63060Phosphatidic acid phosphatase-relatedRegulates the plant height, growth and development of rice [72]
qAEV8LOC_Os08g16260Cytochrome P450 proteinCytochrome P450 protein regulates cell size in the embryo and apoptosis in the endosperm [73]
LOC_Os08g16320Cytochrome P450 proteinCytochrome P450 protein regulates cell size in the embryo and apoptosis in the endosperm [73]
LOC_Os08g16480ATPase, AFG1 family domain-containing proteinATPase is involved in germination percentage, seedling growth in terms of root and shoot lengths [74]
LOC_Os08g16570Expressed proteinDrought resistance [75]
LOC_Os08g16600WD-40 repeat protein family, expressedWD-40 gene family is involved in signal transduction and hormone-controlled plant cell division [68]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gong, W.; Proud, C.; Vinarao, R.; Fukai, S.; Mitchell, J. Genome-Wide Association Study of Early Vigour-Related Traits for a Rice (Oryza sativa L.) japonica Diversity Set Grown in Aerobic Conditions. Biology 2024, 13, 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040261

AMA Style

Gong W, Proud C, Vinarao R, Fukai S, Mitchell J. Genome-Wide Association Study of Early Vigour-Related Traits for a Rice (Oryza sativa L.) japonica Diversity Set Grown in Aerobic Conditions. Biology. 2024; 13(4):261. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gong, Wenliu, Christopher Proud, Ricky Vinarao, Shu Fukai, and Jaquie Mitchell. 2024. "Genome-Wide Association Study of Early Vigour-Related Traits for a Rice (Oryza sativa L.) japonica Diversity Set Grown in Aerobic Conditions" Biology 13, no. 4: 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040261

APA Style

Gong, W., Proud, C., Vinarao, R., Fukai, S., & Mitchell, J. (2024). Genome-Wide Association Study of Early Vigour-Related Traits for a Rice (Oryza sativa L.) japonica Diversity Set Grown in Aerobic Conditions. Biology, 13(4), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040261

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop