Next Article in Journal
An Environmentally Friendly Approach for the Release of Essential Fatty Acids from Cereal By-Products Using Cellulose-Degrading Enzymes
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiple Levels of Triggered Factors and the Obligated Requirement of Cell-to-Cell Movement in the Mutation Repair of Cucumber Mosaic Virus with Defects in the tRNA-like Structure
Previous Article in Journal
Smile Reproducibility and Its Relationship to Self-Perceived Smile Attractiveness
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Studies on the Effects of Oyster Mushroom Spherical Virus China Strain on the Mycelial Growth and Fruiting Body Yield of the Edible Mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Isolates Associated with Rice Bacterial Leaf Spot in Heilongjiang, China

College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(5), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050720
Submission received: 10 March 2022 / Revised: 1 May 2022 / Accepted: 6 May 2022 / Published: 8 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Molecular Plant Pathology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In Northeast China, rice bacterial brown leaf spot caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae is among the most damaging rice diseases. This disease results in significant yield losses. This study focuses on a comprehensive analysis of the pathogen, population structure, and genetic diversity within the species based on biochemical tests and genetic characterizations. Our results indicate high genetic heterogeneity in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae isolates, and clustering of testing isolates and reference strains are related with the genomospecies 1. This work contributes to the physiological classification of the P. s. pv. syringae isolated from Heilongjiang Province, China and the results present new data concerning the phylogeny and genetic diversity. Such studies have not been reported about P. s. pv. syringae from this region yet.

Abstract

In China, rice is one of the most important cereal crops. Rice bacterial brown leaf spot caused by P. s. pv. syringae is among the most damaging rice diseases in the Heilongjiang Province of China and results in substantial yield losses. In this study, a comprehensive analysis of the pathogen, population structure, and genetic diversity within the species was performed. For this purpose, 176 bacterial isolates of P. s. pv. syringae collected from 15 locations were characterized by using biochemical tests such as the LOPAT test, and genetic characterizations such as multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) and repetitive PCR, using BOX, REP and ERIC primers. Biochemical testing and detection of syrB genes confirm the presence of P. s. pv. syringae, genetic characterization by MLSA and genetic fingerprinting by repetitive PCR confirmed that high genetic heterogeneity exists in the P. s. pv. syringae isolates, and clustering of the tested isolates and reference strains are related with the same genomospecies 1. This work contributes to the physiological classification of the P. s. pv. syringae isolated from Heilongjiang Province, China, and the results present new data concerning the phylogeny and genetic diversity. This type of study about P. s. pv. syringae has been not reported from this region until now.

1. Introduction

Bacterial pathogens cause several types of diseases in a wide range of plant species. Many economically important cereal crops are severely affected by bacterial pathogens [1]. The genus Pseudomonas consists of several economically destructive pathogens [2]. It includes numerous phytopathogenic bacteria such as Pseudomonas syringae (which is Gram-negative), a rod-shaped, aerobic bacterium belonging to the family Pseudomonadaceae [3]. The incidence of diseases caused by Pseudomonas is among the top ten most spread bacterial plant diseases. It can infect Legumes, Cruciferae, Solanaceae, Rosaceae, and more than three hundred crops. Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae causes bacterial leaf spot which is a widespread disease. This pathogen affects rice, tobacco, parsley [4], green pumpkin [5], fig tree, kiwi fruit, and philodendron [6]. It has caused huge losses to agricultural production.
Heilongjiang is one of the major rice-producing provinces of China. Rice is the main food crop and its planting area reached almost 3.87 million hectares in 2020. Rice bacterial brown leaf spot caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae is among the most destructive rice disease of Heilongjiang Province of China. According to data obtained from the Plant Quarantine and Protection station, the disease-affected area reached up to 211,000 hectares in the Heilongjiang Province. Symptoms of the disease appear as brown water-stained spots, with yellow halo margins in the early stage, and spindle-shaped, oblong, or irregular-shaped lesions, gray in the center, in the late stage. In severe cases, partial leaves die.
This disease was first reported in Hungary by Klement. This disease attacks the leaves and sheathes the panicles of rice. The bacteria causing this disease is named Pseudomonas oryzicola [7]. This species is a synonym of P. s. pv. syringae [8]. Fang and Ren [9], and Khu and Bai [10], also reported this disease in the Eastern and Northeastern provinces of China. A brown leaf spot caused by a similar bacterium, but further investigation revealed that it formed acid from maltose, weakly hydrolyzed starch, and had a smaller size, which is different from previously reported Pseudomonas later in Japan. Funayama and Hirano reported this disease causing brown discoloration of the leaf sheath in rice as P. s. pv.syringae [10]. Under cool and humid conditions, P. s. pv. syringae caused more damage and it spread more quickly and easily. It also attacked 30 species of cultivated and wild Gramineae [11]. It is possible that several organisms are involved which have similar disease symptoms and genetic diversity within these species also needs investigating. In northeast China, this type of disease is caused by P. s. pv. syringae. So, the genetic diversity within this species needs investigation. Regardless of the P. s. pv. syringae occurrence in rice-growing regions of Heilongjiang Province, the lack of genetic and molecular studies about P. s. pv. syringae variation is the main aspect that restrict the understanding of pathogens. An improved understanding of the population structure and epidemiology of pathogens can help to predict and develop suitable models of disease outbreaks. To achieve this purpose, P. s. pv. syringae isolates were collected from 15 main rice-producing areas of Heilongjiang Province, China.
Molecular tools, such as sequencing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), loop-mediated isothermal amplification, and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), were vital for species identification [12,13]. Molecular characterization and genetic diversity of pathogen populations are critical to understanding the dynamics of pathogen populations to develop effective strategies for disease outbreaks.
In this experiment, P. s. pv. syringae isolates were studied by partial 16S rRNA sequencing [14,15] and syrB analysis to determine the toxin involved in P. s. pv. syringae virulence [16], and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) [4]. Additionally, the pathogenic bacteria were characterized further by using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC, BOX and ERIC). Moreover, a pathogenicity test was also performed. Therefore, the major aims of this study were to reveal the potential genotypic variability and to determine the relatedness of P. s. pv. syringae strains. In this study, we identified the genetic diversity and characterize the P. s. pv. syringae isolates collected from Heilongjiang Province, China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Bacterial Isolates

The infected rice plants were collected from 15 main rice-producing areas of Heilongjiang Province, China (Table S1). These rice plants present disease symptoms of brown spots and necrotic lesions from the leaf tips and margins. First, a small piece of leaf tissue was disinfected with 70% ethyl alcohol, then in 1% sodium hypochlorite, leaf tissue was dipped for 1 min and washed with sterile distilled water. Then, leaf tissue was cut and crushed using a pipette tip in a 1.5 mL tube with 100 µL sterile water. On King’s B medium, the suspensions were streaked [17]. After incubation incubation of 2 days at 26 ℃, a total of 176 colonies were purified and selected on peptone sucrose and frozen at -80 ℃ in 50% glycerol.

2.2. Biochemical Characteristics

Biochemical characteristics of bacterial isolates were analyzed by standard bacteriological methods such as Gram-staining, hydrolysis gelatin, nitrate reductase, LOPAT (levan production, oxidase reaction, potato soft rot, arginine dihydrolase activity, and tobacco hypersensitivity) tests [18], and utilization of various carbon sources. These tests were accomplished according to the method described by Schaad et al. [19].

2.3. Pathogenicity Test

Pathogenicity tests of isolates were executed by inoculation of the bacterial pathogen on rice leaves according to the described methods by Lelliott and Stead [18], and Klement et al. [20]. On Luria Pepton (LP) (Difco) medium, all the strains were regrown for 2 days at 28 ℃. In sterile distilled water, the bacterial suspensions were prepared and the final concentration of 108 cfu/mL was adjusted photometrically. All 176 strains were tested for pathogenicity and each strain was tested and inoculated on two rice plants in triplicate. All the plant was inoculated with a diluted bacteria suspension through the spray method, sterile water was used as a control. In plastic bags, inoculated plants were covered and incubated at 25 ℃ for 10 days. Pathogenic reactions were estimated 10 days after the inoculation. In addition, the susceptibility of the strains through copper sulphate (CuSO4) and streptomycin were also determined. 100 µL of the bacterial suspensions (108 cfu/mL) was spread on the nutrient agar (NA) medium with 50, 100, 200, 400 mg/L CuSO4 and 0 mg/L CuSO4 as a negative control. For streptomycin, 100 µL of the bacterial suspensions (108 cfu/mL) was spread on the nutrient agar (NA) medium with 20, 50, 100, 200 mg/L streptomycins and 0 mg/L streptomycins as a negative control.

2.4. DNA Extraction

From purified bacterial cultures, DNA was extracted, following the manufacturer’s instructions on Bacteria Genomic DNA Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China). NanoDrop™ 2000/c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to compute the isolated DNA. For further investigation, this extracted DNA was stored at -80 ℃.

2.5. syrB Gene Detection

In all the tested isolates, syrB gene was detected to confirm the Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. The primer pair was used to detect syrB gene described in Table S2. According to the described method by Sorensen et al. [16], PCR was amplified. It was programmed for 35 cycles, primer annealing at 60 ℃ for 90 sec, denaturation at 94 ℃ for 90 sec, DNA extension for 3 min at 72 ℃ and further extension at 72 ℃ for 10 min. PCR reactions were performed in 20 µL volumes in a T100 Thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.6. Phylogenetic Analysis of 16S rRNA

For molecular identification, universal primers B1 and B2 (Table S2) amplicons for the partial 16S rRNA sequences were produced by PCR. The reaction conditions for PCR are described by Scortichini et al. [21]. From agarose gel, products were purified and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Sequences were deposited in the GenBank database. To match the unidentified sequences with sequences in public databases, a basic alignment search tool, BLAST, was used [22]. Multiple alignments and comparisons with reference strains were carried out by using CLUSTALW integrated into MEGA 5.0 software. Phylogenetic analyses were accomplished by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method.

2.7. Multilocus Sequence Analysis

Relationship between the P. s. pv. syringae isolates collected from Heilongjiang Provence and reference strains of P. syringae were determined by multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). Three housekeeping genes such as rpoD, gyrB, and gltA were amplified from genomic DNA and sequenced with primer pairs described in Table S2. The following program was used to perform PCR reaction: 3 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles of 30 sec at 94  °C, 30 sec at 56  °C, 72 °C for 30 sec and final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. From agarose gel, products were purified and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Sequences were deposited in the GenBank database. Sequences were edited and aligned using MEGA 5.0 and matched with other Pseudomonas sp. sequences by using BLAST.

2.8. Repetitive PCR

Genetic fingerprinting of P. syringae isolates with reference strains was performed by repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) using the BOX-PCR, ERIC-PCR [23,24]. Repetitive PCR (REP-PCR) was performed by using the genomic DNA from each strain and the primer sets were described in Table S2. Repetitive PCR (REP-PCR) amplification is carried out by following cycles: 1 cycle for 7 min at 95 °C; 34 cycles for 1 min at 94 °C of denaturation, annealing for 1 min at 40 °C (53 °C in BOX-PCR, 52 °C in ERIC-PCR), and extension for 8 min at 65 °C with a single final extension cycle for 15 min at 65 °C and a final immersion at 4 °C. PCR amplifications were repeated three times. To separate amplified PCR products, gel electrophoresis was performed on 2 % agarose gels in 1× TAE buffer for 1.5 h at 5 V/cm, stained with 0.05 µL/mL ethidium bromide and visualized under UV illumination. Generated fingerprints of isolated strains were optically compared.

2.9. Data Analysis

Genotypic profiles produced by rep-PCR were assessed by the BioNumerics V7.6 software (Applied-Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), using the Dice coefficient for pairwise comparison, and the unweighted pair group method, using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) clustering [25].

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Characterization of Bacterial Strains

Rice plants were collected from several fields with suspected bacterial disease symptoms from 15 main rice-producing areas of Heilongjiang Province, China (Figure S1). The pathogen had been isolated from plant tissues that had typical disease symptoms. A sum of 176 bacterial strains were grown and purified on NA medium (Table S1). All of the strains were selected for biochemical characterization (Table 1). Their results showed that the morphological characteristics of 176 strains were the same. These strains were grown at 27 ℃ for 48 h, and they showed a white circular colony of 2–3 mm diameter. The consequences of biochemical characterization of 176 strains were consistent. For bacterial characterization, different biochemical tests were performed. The results of these tests are as follows: levan formation, tobacco hypersensitivity, and catalase exhibit positive reactions, but potato soft-rot, oxidase, and hydrolysis gelatin and growth at 41 ℃ have a negative reaction (Table 1). Some other biochemical tests such as arginine dihydrolase, glucose, mannitol, and inositol also showed positive reactions which indicate that the strain has classic characteristics of P. s. pv. syringae.

3.2. Pathogenicity Tests

To conduct pathogenicity tests, all inoculated rice plants showed disease symptoms after 10–14 days of bacterial inoculation. Initially, they showed water-soaked lesions, which gradually turned into chlorotic spots over time (Figure 1b). Control plants remained healthy and had no disease symptoms. In addition, it indicated that all the tested strains were susceptible to all concentrations of streptomycin and non-susceptible to copper sulphate at the concentration of 100 mg/L.

3.3. Molecular Characterization

P. s. pv. syringae produce a toxin called syringomycin. The syrB gene is responsible for producing syringomycin, so P. s. pv. syringae can be detected by these genes. In all tested 176 isolates, syrB gene was amplified by PCR with primers syrB-F and syrB-R. These primers amplify syrB only in P. s. pv. syringae. At the 752 bp band, the syrB gene was amplified. All the strains were successfully amplified and hence possess the syrB gene. The sequence analysis of the syrB gene was deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under their specific accession numbers MK453195, MK453196, MK453197, MK453198, and MK453199 for five selected samples (Table S3).
The 16S rRNA gene-sequencing technique was used to classify bacteria at the species level. The accession number of 16S rRNA for five selected P. s. pv. syringae samples are MT256188, MT256107, MT256183, MT256185, and MT256186. Results of both the syrB tree (Figure 2a) and 16S rRNA tree (Figure 2b) showed that clusters of P.s.s 1 to P.s.s 5 selected earlier, together with the isolates of P. s. pv. syringae, have a high percentage of bootstrap values. It is confirmed that P. s. pv. syringae isolates collected from rice plants in Heilongjiang Province, China showed 100% homology with P. s. pv. syringae strain Pss9097 (accession number CP026568) and IPPBC-R30 (accession number HQ840766) from NCBI GenBank (Figure 2). Therefore, it can be concluded that the isolates examined in this study can be recognized as P. s. pv. syringae.
The sequences generated with three housekeeping genes (rpoD, gyrB, and gltA) and NJ-tree-constructed data showed that P.s.s 1 to P.s.s 5 were gathered with the following reference of strains from the database: P. syringae pv. pisi HRI 895A, P. syringae pv. atrofaciens GN-In, P. syringae pv. japonica MAFF 301072, P. syringae pv. aptata Pap096 and P. s. pv. syringae EC122 (Figure 3). The sequences and accession numbers of P.s.s1 to P.s.s5 for three housekeeping genes (rpoD, gyrB, and gltA) were deposited in the GenBank (Table S3). From MLSA, a phylogenetic tree was obtained, showing that our isolates were associated with genomospecies 1 of P. syringae [26].

3.4. Rep-PCR Analysis

REP-PCR genomic fingerprints were produced to examine the genetic diversity of 176 P. s. pv. syringae isolates. Banding patterns of DNA were multifarious among tested isolates and showed genetic diversity (Figure 4). By using the fingerprinting technique, distinct banding patterns were generated. Oligonucleotide primers and the different PCR situations were used in this process. In BOX-PCR analysis, the amplified band’s length ranged from 500 to 3000 bp (Figure 4a), and ERIC and REP-PCR ranged from 100 to 10,000 bp (Figure 4b,c).
Reproducible fingerprint profiles were produced with each technique by repeating the procedures. For the combination of rep-PCR results, a dendrogram was calculated by Dice coefficients with unweighted pair group method clustering (UPGMA), based on 37.5% similarity level (Figure S2); strains were divided into eight main groups and different colors represent 15 different regions of Heilongjiang Province. Cluster Ⅰ includes 19 P. s. pv. syringae isolates from the Suiling and 3 P. s. pv. syringae isolates from Acheng and Ningan region, with cluster Ⅱ largely consisting of isolates from the Yanshou region and a small portion of the Xingkaihu Farm and only one isolate from the Qing an, Mingshui and Hailun regions, and all the strains isolated from Raohe and Fangzheng region; cluster Ⅲ includes 14 isolates from five different regions. Cluster Ⅳ is the most diverse cluster consisting of 50 isolates from nine different regions, this cluster also has the highest number of strains. Cluster V consists of 39 isolates from five regions; it consists of all the strains isolated from Wuchang, Jiamusi and Qianjin. However, groups Ⅵ, Ⅶ and Ⅷ have the lowest number of strains: they only have three, three, and one strain, respectively.
To establish a potential correlation between the regions considering P. s. pv. syringae genetic profile diversity, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. This analysis enables us to correlate the P. s. pv. syringae population and diversity of each region of Heilongjiang Province; P. s. pv. syringae populations from Muling, Qing an, Xingkaihu Farm, Acheng and Wangkui were related and distinct from those found in the Jiamusi and Mingshui region (Figure 5a). This configuration was mainly owing to the high abundance of ML, QA, HU, AC and WK strains in these regions when compared with the lesser abundance in other regions. In addition, P. s. pv. syringae populations from Wuchang and Qianjin were highly correlated (Figure 5b). P. s. pv. syringae populations from Suiling were different from other populations. From the results, we can conclude that there is no direct relation between the genetic relationship and geographical distance. The genetic relationship between two regions located far away from each other may be very close. Similarly, the genetic relationship between two closely located regions may be different.

4. Discussion

The incidence of bacterial brown leaf spot in rice caused by P. s. pv. syringae in Heilongjiang Province of China was reported by many scientists but a comprehensive study of the pathogen population structure and genetic diversity within the species was not conducted until now. P. s. pv. syringae is a widespread disease. This pathogen infects numerous plant species such as citrus, apples, pear, Ficus carica L. (Ivanović, Ž) [6] and Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev.) C.F. Liang and A.R. Ferguson (Ivanović, Ž and Balestra, G.M.) [6,27]. P. s. pv. syringae spread rapidly in cool and moist conditions and this pathogen can easily enter through wounded and damaged plant tissue by winds or cool temperatures.
In our study, 176 isolates originating from 15 main rice-producing areas of Heilongjiang Province were investigated. These strains were characterized and identified by using biochemical and molecular tests. Results of these tests confirm the P. s. pv. syringae presence. Biochemical characteristics of bacterial isolates were analyzed by standard bacteriological methods such as Gram-staining, hydrolysis gelatin, nitrate reductase, LOPAT and utilization of various carbon sources. Characteristics of representative strains of bacterial isolates indicated that it was a Gram-negative bacteria, with a maximum death temperature of 41 °C, negative for hydrolyzed gelatin, nitrate reductase, oxidase activity, potato rot, and positive for fructan , arginine and tobacco hypersensitivity. In terms of carbon source utilization, glucose, lactose, mannose and sucrose can be used, but maltose and trehalose can not be used. All of the results indicated typical P. s. pv. syringae. P. s. pv. syringae strains have a unique character of producing and export of syringomycins and syringopeptins toxins; syrB and syrD genes are accountable for the creation of these toxins, respectively [5]. All the strains isolated from rice have the syrB gene which is a toxin-producing gene. It indicates that the pathogen that causes the rice bacterial brown leaf spot is P. s. pv. syringae. Genetic characterizations such as multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing further confirm that the phylogenetic tree obtained from 16S rRNA and MLSA shows a phylogenetic relationship with P. s. pv. Syringae; all of the P. s. pv. syringae isolates belong to the genomospecies 1 of P. syringe [26]. The genetic variability in the P. s. pv. syringae isolates was evaluated by rep-PCR using BOX, REP, and ERIC primer sets. Their patterns were analyzed with UPGMA and Dice’s coefficients [25]. Based on a 37.5% similarity level, strains were divided into eight main groups and there is no direct relation between the genetic relationship and geographical distance indicated by principal component analysis (PCA).
This study indicates that there is significant genetic heterogeneity within the P. s. pv. syringae. The variability was consistent with earlier studies utilizing ERIC-PCR [28], or BOX-PCR [29,30], on the matching strains or ERIC-PCR [31], or AFLP analyses [32,33], on additional P. s. pv. syringae strains. Based on genetic and phenotypic confirmation, a survey shows that P. s. pv. syringae isolates from heart-leaf philodendron, the fig tree and kiwi fruit were similar on ERIC and REP-PCR, but with marginally different genetic DNA profiles on BOX-PCR [6]. However, the fingerprints of 176 isolates of rice from 15 different regions showed no significant difference on BOX-PCR, but there was significant diversity on ERIC-PCR and REP-PCR (Figure 4). Therefore, in the analysis of our research, the results obtained by BOX, ERIC and REP were jointly analyzed to obtain the final cluster diagram, which showed that the pathogen of P. s. pv. syringae isolated from rice of Heilongjiang Province in China had high genetic heterogenity and there was no obvious correlation with geographic location. However, most of the strains classified into the second group in the cluster diagram are from Yanshou, Xingkaihu Farm, Raohe and Fangzheng strains (Figure S2). The map of Heilongjiang Province in Figure S1 shows that these four regions are relatively close in terms of geographical distance, which are located in the southeastern region of Heilongjiang Province. It indicate that the population of P. s. pv. syringae may have different degrees of bacterial source communication between different locations in the same region. The reason may be that strains from the same geographical area face the same selection pressure under the same geographical conditions, which leads to directional selection of their genetic material. However, the strains isolated from two regions with relatively close geographical distance, such as Suiling and Hailun, have a farther genetic relationship. It may be that the strains at the two sites face different selection pressures due to differences in soil and climatic conditions, and their genetic material makes directional selection. The results of the conjoint analysis would provide stronger evidence. Differences in climatic factors, epidemic dynamics, and disease control measures probably contributed to the extensive genomic diversification of P. s. pv. syringae, which is responsible for bacterial brown leaf spot of rice in Heilongjiang Province, China. This type of study about P. s. pv. syringae has not been reported from this region. These results provide an primary position to study genetic connection among the strains of rice bacterial brown leaf spot originating from different regions of Heilongjiang.
The pathogen of P. s. pv. syringae can spread in numerous ways such as aerial, dust, or rain splashes and its attack on different hosts is not specific to one species [33,34,35]. This disease has a serious economic effect on rice. In a previous study conducted in Iran, the isolated strains, which cause foot and sheath rot of rice, were divided into two groups based on physiological, morphological and biochemical features, pathogenicity, and PCR with specified primers [36]. The first group consisted of 21 strains of P. c. sub sp. ca rotovorum, which produced foot rot. The second group consisted of 22 P. s. pv. syringae strains that induced sheath rot. There were no significant variations in the severity of illness and symptoms. These findings show that the pathogenicity of bacteria obtained from diverse fields is similar. So, study of the biological control of bacterial brown leaf spot on rice by antagonistic strains, pathogenicity testing in different parts of Heilongjiang Province of China, and use of resistant cultivars could be a case study for future research.

5. Conclusions

Rice bacterial brown leaf spot is one of the most damaging rice diseases in Heilongjiang Province of China. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the pathogen, population structure, and genetic diversity within the species based on biochemical tests and genetic characterizations. Phylogenetic analyses of gyrB, rpoD, and gltA gene sequences showed that P. syringae pv. syringae causes rice bacterial brown leaf spot, and belongs to genomospecies 1. The results also indicate high genetic heterogeneity in P. s. pv. syringae isolates by rep-PCR. This work presents new data concerning the phylogeny and genetic diversity. Such studies have not been reported about P. s. pv. syringae from this region yet, and this work contributes to further epidemiological studies of this pathogen and for determining breeding strategies for P. s. pv. syringae control.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11050720/s1, Figure S1: The 15 main rice producing areas in Heilongjiang Province of China, Figure S2:Clustering of Pseudomonas syringae pv.syringae isolates from Oryza sativa L. Table S1: Total isolates of Pseudomonas syringae pv.syringae strains in this study, Table S2: Tests and list of primers used in this study, Table S3: Reference strains for detection of toxin-producing and MLSA analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.P., S.Y. and Y.Z.; methodology, L.P., S.Y. and Y.Z.; software, H.Y. and S.S.; investigation, L.P. and X.X.; resources, X.X. and H.Y.; data curation, L.P., S.Y. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.P.; writing—review and editing, J.Z., H.Y. and S.S.; supervision, J.Z. and M.Y.; project administration and funding acquisition, J.Z. and M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “Precision poverty alleviation project of planting industry science and technology, special project of central leading local science and technology development, grant number ZY18C08”, “Isolation and identification of candidate genes related to response to the stress of Magnaporthe grisea in Rice, nature fund project, Heilongjiang, China, grant number C2017032”, and “Integration and extension of green control techniques for rice diseases in main rice production areas of Heilongjiang, grant number GA19B104”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the help with collecting rice bacterial brown spot samples from the 15 main rice-producing areas in Heilongjiang Province by Heilongjiang Plant Protection Station.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. White, F.F.; Potnis, N.; Jones, J.B.; Koebnik, R. The Type III Effectors of Xanthomonas. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009, 10, 749–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vanneste, J.L. The Scientific, Economic, and Social Impacts of the New Zealand Outbreak of Bacterial Canker of Kiwifruit (Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae). Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 377–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. de Bentzmann, S.; Plésiat, P. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Opportunistic Pathogen and Human Infections. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 1655–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bull, C.T.; Clarke, C.R.; Cai, R.; Vinatzer, B.A.; Jardini, T.M.; Koike, S.T. Multilocus Sequence Typing of Pseudomonas syringae Sensu Lato Confirms Previously Described Genomospecies and Permits Rapid Identification of P. syringae pv. coriandricola and P. syringae pv. apii Causing Bacterial Leaf Spot on Parsley. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 847–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Balaž, J.; Iličić, R.; Maširević, S.; Jošić, D.; Kojić, S. First Report of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Causing Bacterial Leaf Spots of Oil Pumpkin (Cucurbita Pepo) in Serbia. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ivanović, Ž.; Blagojević, J.; Nikolić, I. Leaf Spot Disease on Philodendron scandens, Ficus carica and Actinidia deliciosa Caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in Serbia. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 151, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Klement, Z. A New Bacterial Disease of Rice Caused by Pseudomonas oryzicola n. sp. Acta Microbiol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1955, 2, 265–274. [Google Scholar]
  8. Young, J.M.; Dye, D.W.; Bradbury, J.F.; Panagopoulos, C.G.; Robbs, C.F. A Proposed Nomenclature and Classification for Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 1978, 21, 153–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fang, C.T.; Ren, H.C. A Bacterial Disease of Rice New to China. Acta Phytopath 1960, 6, 90–92. [Google Scholar]
  10. Khu, T.C.; Bai, T.K. Investigations on a New Bacterial Disease of Rice, Brown Spot. Preliminary Communication (Distribution, Symptoms, and Determination of the Genus of the Causal Agent of the Disease). Acta Phytopath 1960, 6, 93–105. [Google Scholar]
  11. Funayama, H.; Hirano, T. A sheath brown rot of rice caused by Pseudomonas. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 1963, 28, 67–68. [Google Scholar]
  12. Roach, R.; Mann, R.; Gambley, C.G.; Shivas, R.G.; Rodoni, B. Identification of Xanthomonas Species Associated with Bacterial Leaf Spot of Tomato, Capsicum and Chilli Crops in Eastern Australia. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 150, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Larrea-Sarmiento, A.; Dhakal, U.; Boluk, G.; Fatdal, L.; Alvarez, A.; Strayer-Scherer, A.; Paret, M.; Jones, J.; Jenkins, D.; Arif, M. Development of a Genome-Informed Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for Rapid and Specific Detection of Xanthomonas euvesicatoria. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gironde, S.; Manceau, C. Housekeeping Gene Sequencing and Multilocus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis to Identify Subpopulations within Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato That Correlate with Host Specificity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 3266–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hilario, E.; Buckley, T.R.; Young, J.M. Improved Resolution on the Phylogenetic Relationships among Pseudomonas by the Combined Analysis of atpD, carA, recA and 16S rDNA. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2004, 86, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sorensen, K.N.; Kim, K.-H.; Takemoto, J.Y. PCR Detection of Cyclic Lipodepsinonapeptide-Producing Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and Similarity of Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. King, E.O.; Ward, M.K.; Raney, D.E. Two Simple Media for the Demonstration of Pyocyanin and Fluorescin. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1954, 44, 301–307. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lelliott, R.A.; Stead, D.E. Methods for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Diseases of Plants; Methods in Plant Pathology; Blackwell Scientific Publication: Boston, MA, USA, 1987; ISBN 978-0-632-01233-6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schaad, N.W.; Jones, J.B.; Chun, W. Laboratory Guide for Identifiction of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, 3rd ed.; American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2001; ISBN 978-0-89054-263-7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Klement, Z.; Rudolph, K.; Sands, D.C. Methods in Phytobacteriology; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1990; ISBN 978-963-05-4955-4. [Google Scholar]
  21. Scortichini, M.; Rossi, M.P.; Loreti, S.; Bosco, A.; Fiori, M.; Jackson, R.W.; Stead, D.E.; Aspin, A.; Marchesi, U.; Zini, M.; et al. Pseudomonas syringae pv. coryli, the Causal Agent of Bacterial Twig Dieback of Corylus avellana. Phytopathology 2005, 95, 1316–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Altschul, S. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lupski, J.R.; Weinstock, G.M. Short, Interspersed Repetitive DNA Sequences in Prokaryotic Genomes. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 4525–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Versalovic, J.; Schneider, M.; Bruijn, F.J.D.; Lupski, J.R. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Method Mol. Cell Biol. 1994, 5, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rossi, F.; Amadoro, C.; Conficoni, D.; Giaccone, V.; Colavita, G. Occurrence, Diversity of Listeria Spp. Isolates from Food and Food-Contact Surfaces and the Presence of Virulence Genes. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Gardan, L.; Shafik, H.; Belouin, S.; Broch, R.; Grimont, F.; Grimont, P.A.D. DNA Relatedness among the Pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae and Description of Pseudomonas tremae sp. nov. and Pseudomonas cannabina sp. nov. (Ex Sutic and Dowson 1959). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1999, 49, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Balestra, G.M.; Varvaro, L. Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Causal Agent of Disease on Floral Buds of Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev) Liang et Ferguson in Italy. J. Phytopathol. 1997, 145, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cirvilleri, G.; Bonaccorsi, A.; Scuderi, G.; Scortichini, M. Potential Biological Control Activity and Genetic Diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Strains. J. Phytopathol. 2005, 153, 654–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Natalini, U.; Rossi, M.P.; Barionovi, D.; Scortichini, M. Genetic and Pathogenic Diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Isolates Associated with Bud Necrosis and Leaf Spot of Pear in a Single Orchard. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 88, 219–223. [Google Scholar]
  30. Scortichini, M.; Marchesi, U.; Dettori, M.T.; Rossi, M.P. Genetic Diversity, Presence of the syrB Gene, Host Preference and Virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Strains from Woody and Herbaceous Host Plants. Plant Pathol. 2003, 52, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Little, E.L.; Bostock, R.M.; Kirkpatrick, B.C. Genetic Characterization of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Strains from Stone Fruits in California. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3818–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Cirvilleri, G.; Scuderi, G.; Bonaccorsi, A.; Scortichini, M. Molecular characterization of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae strains from different host plants using fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 88, 329–333. [Google Scholar]
  33. Manceau, C.; Brin, C. Pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae Are Structured in Genetic Populations Allowing the Selection of Specific Markers for Their Detection in Plant Samples. In Pseudomonas Syringae and Related Pathogens; Iacobellis, N.S., Collmer, A., Hutcheson, S.W., Mansfield, J.W., Morris, C.E., Murillo, J., Schaad, N.W., Stead, D.E., Surico, G., Ullrich, M.S., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 503–512. ISBN 978-90-481-6267-3. [Google Scholar]
  34. Young, J.M. Pathogenicity and Identification of the Lilac Pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringa van Hall 1902. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1991, 118, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Morris, C.E.; Kinkel, L.L.; Xiao, K.; Prior, P.; Sands, D.C. Surprising Niche for the Plant Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2007, 7, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khoshkdaman, M.; Ebadi, A.A.; Mossanejad, S.; Pedramfar, H. Identification of causal agents of foot and sheath rot of rice in the field of Guilan province of Iran. Agric. Trop. Subtrop. 2008, 41, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Field symptoms of rice bacterial brown spot diseases for the whole plant (a) and inoculated leaves (b).
Figure 1. Field symptoms of rice bacterial brown spot diseases for the whole plant (a) and inoculated leaves (b).
Biology 11 00720 g001
Figure 2. Joining phylogenetic trees neighbor based on syrB (a) and 16S rRNA (b).
Figure 2. Joining phylogenetic trees neighbor based on syrB (a) and 16S rRNA (b).
Biology 11 00720 g002
Figure 3. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of P. s. pv. syringae strains from rice and reference strains derived from a concatenation of gyrB-rpoD-gltA genes. Bar—estimated nucleotide substitutions per site is 0.05.
Figure 3. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of P. s. pv. syringae strains from rice and reference strains derived from a concatenation of gyrB-rpoD-gltA genes. Bar—estimated nucleotide substitutions per site is 0.05.
Biology 11 00720 g003
Figure 4. Genomic fingerprints of P. s. pv. syringae isolates generated by BOX (a), ERIC (b), and REP (c) primers in 2% agarose gel.
Figure 4. Genomic fingerprints of P. s. pv. syringae isolates generated by BOX (a), ERIC (b), and REP (c) primers in 2% agarose gel.
Biology 11 00720 g004
Figure 5. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots produced from P. s. pv. syringae profiles identified from the 15 studied regions using BioNumerics V7.6 software Plan view (a). An ideal combination for joint evaluation of tree graphs and PCoA (b).
Figure 5. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots produced from P. s. pv. syringae profiles identified from the 15 studied regions using BioNumerics V7.6 software Plan view (a). An ideal combination for joint evaluation of tree graphs and PCoA (b).
Biology 11 00720 g005
Table 1. Origin and main biochemical characteristics of P. s. pv. syringae isolates.
Table 1. Origin and main biochemical characteristics of P. s. pv. syringae isolates.
CharacteristicsReaction
Growth at 41 °C
Detection of syrB+
Gram staining
Hydrolysis gelatin
Nitrate reductase
LOPAT TestLevan formation+
Oxidase
Potato rot
Arginine dihydrolase+
Tobacco hypersensitivity+
Utilization as carbon sourceGlucose+
Mannose+
Lactose+
Maltose
Sucrose+
Trehalose
Symbol of “+” represents positive response for the tested strain, and “−” represents negative response for the tested strain.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, L.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Haseeb, Y.; Song, S.; Xu, X.; Yang, M.; Zhang, J. Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Isolates Associated with Rice Bacterial Leaf Spot in Heilongjiang, China. Biology 2022, 11, 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050720

AMA Style

Peng L, Yang S, Zhang Y, Haseeb Y, Song S, Xu X, Yang M, Zhang J. Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Isolates Associated with Rice Bacterial Leaf Spot in Heilongjiang, China. Biology. 2022; 11(5):720. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Lili, Songrun Yang, Yao Zhang, Younis Haseeb, Shuang Song, Xiaofeng Xu, Mingxiu Yang, and Junhua Zhang. 2022. "Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Isolates Associated with Rice Bacterial Leaf Spot in Heilongjiang, China" Biology 11, no. 5: 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050720

APA Style

Peng, L., Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Haseeb, Y., Song, S., Xu, X., Yang, M., & Zhang, J. (2022). Characterization and Genetic Diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Isolates Associated with Rice Bacterial Leaf Spot in Heilongjiang, China. Biology, 11(5), 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop