Next Article in Journal
Micropropagation of Seed-Derived Clonal Lines of the Endangered Agave marmorata Roezl and Their Compatibility with Endophytes
Previous Article in Journal
Heterologous Expression of Cyanobacterial Cyanase Gene (CYN) in Microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for Bioremediation of Cyanide Pollution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Mineral Carriers on Biofilm Formation and Nitrogen Removal Activity by an Indigenous Anammox Community from Cold Groundwater Ecosystem Alone and Bioaugmented with Biomass from a “Warm” Anammox Reactor

1
Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, «Fundamentals of Biotechnology» Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia
2
Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(10), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101421
Submission received: 3 September 2022 / Revised: 24 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Environmental Biotechnology (AEB))

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

During more than 50 years of exploitation of the sludge repositories near Chepetsky Mechanical Plant (Glazov, Udmurtia, Russia) containing solid wastes of uranium and processed polymetallic concentrate, the soluble compounds entered the upper aquifer due to infiltration. Nowadays, this has resulted in a high level of pollution of the groundwater with reduced and oxidized nitrogen compounds. In this work, quartz, kaolin, and bentonite clays from various deposits were shown to induce biofilm formation and enhance nitrogen removal by an indigenous microbial community capable of anaerobic ammonium oxidation with nitrite (anammox) at low temperatures. The addition of a “warm” anammox community was also effective in further improving nitrogen removal and expanding the list of mineral carriers most suitable for creating a permeable reactive barrier. It has been suggested that the anammox activity is determined by the presence of essential trace elements in the carrier, the morphology of its surface, and most importantly, competition from rapidly growing microbial groups. Future work was discussed to adapt the “warm” anammox community to cold and provide the anammox community with nitrite through a partial denitrification route within the scope of sustainable anammox-based bioremediation of a nitrogen-polluted cold aquifer. In this unique habitat, novel species of anammox bacteria that are adapted to cold and heavy nitrogen pollution can be discovered.

Abstract

The complex pollution of aquifers by reduced and oxidized nitrogen compounds is currently considered one of the urgent environmental problems that require non-standard solutions. This work was a laboratory-scale trial to show the feasibility of using various mineral carriers to create a permeable in situ barrier in cold (10 °C) aquifers with extremely high nitrogen pollution and inhabited by the Candidatus Scalindua-dominated indigenous anammox community. It has been established that for the removal of ammonium and nitrite in situ due to the predominant contribution of the anammox process, quartz, kaolin clays of the Kantatsky and Kamalinsky deposits, bentonite clay of the Berezovsky deposit, and zeolite of the Kholinsky deposit can be used as components of the permeable barrier. Biofouling of natural loams from a contaminated aquifer can also occur under favorable conditions. It has been suggested that the anammox activity is determined by a number of factors, including the presence of the essential trace elements in the carrier and the surface morphology. However, one of the most important factors is competition with other microbial groups that can develop on the surface of the carrier at a faster rate. For this reason, carriers with a high specific surface area and containing the necessary microelements were overgrown with the most rapidly growing microorganisms. Bioaugmentation with a “warm” anammox community from a laboratory reactor dominated by Ca. Kuenenia improved nitrogen removal rates and biofilm formation on most of the mineral carriers, including bentonite clay of the Dinozavrovoye deposit, as well as loamy rock and zeolite-containing tripoli, in addition to carriers that perform best with the indigenous anammox community. The feasibility of coupled partial denitrification–anammox and the adaptation of a “warm” anammox community to low temperatures and hazardous components contained in polluted groundwater prior to bioaugmentation should be the scope of future research to enhance the anammox process in cold, nitrate-rich aquifers.

1. Introduction

The complex pollution of aquatic ecosystems with reduced and oxidized nitrogen compounds is considered one of the urgent ecological problems nowadays. In particular, pollution of the groundwater is one of the important problems requiring non-standard solutions. In situ microbial remediation methods in such ecosystems for the simultaneous removal of ammonium and nitrate are environmentally safe and cost-effective. Among the most promising microorganisms for nitrogen removal in groundwater are anammox bacteria. These autotrophic anaerobes from the phylum Planctomycetes use both reduced and oxidized forms of nitrogen (ammonium and nitrite) in their metabolism, forming harmless molecular nitrogen [1]. However, the application of anammox bacteria for bioremediation of the groundwater is complicated due to some physiological features of this group, such as low growth rate, requirements of a certain temperature for growth, and a continuous-flow system with constant substrate supply.
Anammox bacteria have a tendency to the attached growth and formation of multi-species biofilms together with other heterotrophic and autotrophic members of the microbial communities. This property is widely used in wastewater treatment: various biofilm reactor systems show high stability and nitrogen removal efficiency [2,3,4]. One of the promising approaches to creating conditions for the growth of anammox bacteria in aquifers is the application of special inert and semi-inert carriers in the aquifers, similar to those used in bioreactors for wastewater treatment. It was shown previously that the anammox community forms metabolically active biofilms on a wide range of materials that can be used as a permeable biogeochemical barrier. Permeable barriers are a promising form of biogeochemical barrier for groundwater treatment. Such barriers, made of inexpensive materials or the native rock of the water-bearing horizon, do not change the hydrological regimen of the groundwater and provide for macro component removal from the fluid flow [5,6].
One of the main limitations of the wide application of anammox technology for wastewater treatment and bioremediation is the low ambient temperature [7,8,9]. This is especially true for groundwater ecosystems, where the year-round temperature usually does not exceed 10 °C, given that most anammox bacteria exploited for wastewater treatment have a temperature optimum of 30–40 °C [10,11]. It was shown that the specific activity of anammox bacteria can drop dramatically (up to ten times) when the temperature declines from 30 to 10 °C [12], while a sharper activity decline was observed at 15 °C [12,13]. However, numerous works confirm the possibility of the gradual adaptation of the “warm” anammox community to lower temperatures [9]. Moreover, it has been reported that the optimum temperature for anammox activity in natural habitats may be as low as 9 °C in permeable Arctic sediment [14], 12 °C in the arctic, permanently cold marine sediments [15]; or 15 °C in marine sediment from Skaggerak (North Sea) [16]. Physiologically, the low temperature can reduce enzyme activity and the fluidity of bacterial membranes, alter the transport of nutrients and waste products, decrease the rates of transcription, translation, and cell division, denature proteins, fold proteins inappropriately, and form intracellular ice [17]. Thus, the price of adaptation to cold is the conservation of energy for the core metabolism due to a decrease in biosynthesis in general, leading to reduced growth rate and activity of anammox bacteria [9].
For a faster start-up of “cold” anammox or to maintain high anammox activity at low temperatures, it is necessary to maintain a high concentration of anammox bacteria in the system. In addition to the retention of anammox bacteria in the form of granules [18,19] or biofilms [20] on various carriers, the so-called bioaugmentation technology can increase the number of certain microorganisms in the microbial community by adding appropriate exogenous cells or establishing conditions promoting their growth [21,22,23]. In the case of anammox bacteria, bioaugmentation was successfully applied to various wastewater treatment facilities treating landfill leachate [24,25], mainstream [26], and low-strength sewage [27]. This method was beneficial to achieve a faster start-up and increase the efficiency of nitrogen removal [24,25]. Moreover, due to bioaugmentation, anammox bacteria were able to adapt to oxytetracycline that was present in the treated water [28,29] and, presumably, to outcompete nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in the bioreactor community [27]. In a low-temperature system, winter bioaugmentation with stored summer sludge helps to restore the anammox activity [30]. Thus, bioaugmentation appears to be an effective tool to increase the abundance and improve the activity of anammox bacteria in various water treating systems and could be potentially used for bioremediation of polluted aquifers as well.
Bioaugmentation technology for bioremediation of polluted underground ecosystems has gained considerable interest. Hazardous compounds, such as carbon tetrachloride, chloroethenes, chlorobenzenes, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, etc., were shown to be successfully removed from the groundwater [31]. In more recent work [32], the feasibility of sequential anaerobic and aerobic bioaugmentation for bioremediation of groundwater contaminated by trichloroethene and 1,4-dioxane was demonstrated. Significant efforts by Michalsen et al. [33,34] were aimed at the use of various strains of the genera Gordonia and Pseudomonas to clean up a hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX)-contaminated aquifer. Several researchers have also successfully carried out bioremediation of groundwater contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon [35,36]. It is noted that field-scale trials should be preceded by laboratory evaluation [34].
The research presented herein was undertaken to evaluate the potential for bioremediation of nitrogen-polluted aquifers with an indigenous anammox community adapted to a cold environment. In order to better retain the anammox community in the groundwater system, various mineral carriers were tested to find the best surface and mineral composition for biofilm formation. The “warm” anammox community from the laboratory reactor was also added to the indigenous community to evaluate the possibility of the enhancement of anammox activity in a cold underground environment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Contaminated Groundwater, Containing an Indigenous Anammox Community

Groundwater, contaminated with nitrogen compounds, originated from the water-bearing horizon near Chepetsky Mechanical Plant (CHMZ) (Glazov, Udmurtia, Russia). During more than 50 years of exploitation of the sludge repositories containing solid wastes of uranium and processed polymetallic concentrate, the soluble compounds entered the upper aquifer due to infiltration. Nowadays, this results in a high level of pollution of groundwater by nitrates, ammonium, sulfates, and various metal ions. Technogenic water-bearing horizon was heavily polluted with nitrogen, including reduced and oxidized forms, at a depth of 10–15 m.
Polluted water for the study was taken from a well at a depth of 12 m. The amount of nitrite, presumably of biogenic origin, reached 28 mg/L, providing suitable conditions for anammox bacteria in this unique low-temperature habitat (Table 1). It is important to note the extremely high concentrations of nitrate in the sample, reaching up to 7400 mg/L. Nitrates can be a strong stress factor for the development of microorganisms; on the other hand, they can supply anammox bacteria with necessary nitrite as a result of denitrification. The concentration of bicarbonate ions reached 280 mg/L, which is also an important factor for the development of autotrophic anammox bacteria. One of the dominant contaminants is sulfate ions, which give a prerequisite for the development of ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms due to the processes of sulfate-reducing anaerobic ammonium oxidation [37]. A low content of phosphate indicates a deficiency of this element. The high redox potential of the sample, possibly due to the presence of nitrates, sulfates, and other oxidizing agents, indicates that an intensive anammox process is possible only in microbial biofilms with an Eh gradient or after the removal of nitrate due to denitrification, which contributes to a decrease in the redox potential. The low content of organic matter in the system does not allow for effective self-cleaning of the system from nitrogen due to heterotrophic denitrification. For this reason, the only possible way of self-cleaning the system from ammonium is anaerobic ammonium oxidation in anammox processes or aerobic ammonium oxidation in the nitrification process. The water also contained technogenic uranium at a concentration of 250 µg/L.
Thus, the development of biofilms is necessary for the anammox process under conditions of oxidative and nitrate stress. Composition of the microbial community of the groundwater is discussed below in the Results and Discussion section.

2.2. Bioaugmentating Anammox Biomass

Biomass from the laboratory up-flow bioreactor was used as an allochthonous (bioaugmentation) anammox community [22]. The reactor was operated at room temperature (24–28 °C) and fed with synthetic mineral media, containing 200 mg N-NH4/L and 200 mg N-NO2/L. Anammox biomass formed granules up to 3 mm in diameter. The granules were preliminarily dispersed and passed through a 0.2 mm sieve to obtain a highly dispersed cell suspension.

2.3. Mineral Carriers

Two types of substances were used as carriers: mineral materials used as permeable barriers—different silicates and aluminosilicates (vermiculite, zeolite, expanded clay, and sand), and materials of the native rock from the water-bearing horizon (Table 2). For comparison, in the current study, the native rock from another water-bearing horizon, B2, was used, from a depth of 12 m with high levels of nitrogen pollution. The study of in situ biological treatment was carried out previously at this site [38].
The main attention was paid to the clay minerals. Clays are used as components of non-permeable vertical barriers or cutoff slurry walls [39]. Such barriers are used to slow down or stop the movement of the formation water or to create “reactive gates” to direct flow into the treatment zone in a reactive permeable barrier. In the current study, the natural clays of the bentonite and kaolin types from various deposits on the territory of the Russian Federation were used (Figure S1). The composition of the clays was studied in detail previously [40].
The ChMZ rock used in this study was sampled from water-bearing horizons from a depth of 10–11 m in parallel with groundwater sampling. Its mineralogical composition includes predominantly quartz (45–50%), a mixture of clay minerals (kaolinite, illite) (∑ 15–20%), potassium feldspar (20–25%), plagioclase (5–10%), and 5–10% Fe-containing minerals, in total. B2 rock is a loam containing the following substances: quartz (~50%), potassium feldspar (~24%), albite (~5%), and also up to 5% Fe-containing minerals (goethite or siderite). Clay fraction contains smectite (~7 to 8%), illite (~5 to 6%), and kaolinite.
Elemental composition of the mineral carriers used in the study is shown in Table 3. Carriers had different specific surface areas. Bentonite clays and expanded clay had the most developed surface. The minimal specific surface area was typical for sand and vermiculite (it did not exceed 5 m2/g).

2.4. Experimental Setup

Briefly, 1 g of the mineral carriers (see Table 2) was placed into each sterile 30 mL glass vial together with 20 ml of groundwater. In groundwater, the concentration of ammonium and nitrite nitrogen was preliminarily set at 50 mg N-NH4/L and 60 mg N-NO2/L by adding the appropriate amount of nitrogen salts (NH4Cl and NaNO2). Then, 1 mL (pre-washed and diluted with the distilled water) of the bioaugmenting anammox biomass suspension from the laboratory reactor was placed into one-half of the vials. The relative number of anammox cells, according to direct counting of cells hybridized with a Cy-3-labeled anammox-specific FISH probe, in groundwater was 2 × 104 cells/ml, in suspension from the anammox reactor—2 × 106 cells/mL. The glass vials were thoroughly purged with argon and then sealed with a rubber stopper and an aluminum crimp cap. With each of the mineral carriers, the experiment was carried out in duplicate, both for indigenous and bioaugmented anammox communities. Incubation was carried out without stirring in the dark at 10 °C for 35 days. Samples for the determination of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate nitrogen, pH, and Eh were taken every 5 days.

2.5. High-Throughput Sequencing of 16S rRNA Genes

DNA was isolated using the FastDNA™ SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The preparation of amplicon libraries of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was carried out as described previously [41] using a pair of primers: 515F (5′-GTGBCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′ [42]), Pro-mod-805R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′ [43]). The libraries were sequenced on a MiSeq system (Illumina, California, United States) using a 150-nucleotide length paired-end read cartridge. Libraries were prepared and sequenced into two replicas for each sample. The amplicon sequence variant (ASV) table was constructed using the Dada2 script [44] and the SILVA 138.1 database [45]. Analysis of the ASV table was performed using MicrobiomeAnalyst [46].

2.6. Analytical Methods

The elemental composition of mineral carriers was determined using X-ray spectral fluorescence analysis on Axios mAX Advanced sequential vacuum spectrometer (with dispersion by the wavelength) (PANalytical, Netherlands). Standard samples of the US Geological Survey (USGS) were used as the controls. Organic carbon (Corg) was determined by the total organic carbon analyzer Shimadzu TOC-V Series (Japan).
The determination of Eh and pH values in groundwater was carried out using an ANION-4100 pH meter/ionometer (Infraspak-Analyte, Russia) with a combination of electrodes. The pH and Eh during incubation experiments were determined using an FE20 pH meter equipped with an InLab® microelectrode and ORP electrode InLab Redox Micro (all Mettler Toledo, Switzerland).
The concentrations of anions and cations were measured on a Capel-205 new generation capillary electrophoresis system (Lumex, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Electrophoresis was performed in untreated fused-silica capillaries of 60 cm length (effective length, 50 cm) and 75 μm internal diameter. The capillary was held at 20 °C and the applied voltage was +13 kV for cations or −17 kV for anions [6].
Development rates of microbial communities on mineral carriers were determined using the MTT assay [6].

2.7. Microscopy

Visualization and analysis of the microbial biofilm on the surface of the mineral carrier were performed using a Leica SP5 confocal scanning laser microscope (Leica, Germany) and program package Comstat 2.1 for ImageJ. Staining of the polysaccharide matrix was performed with lectin concavalin A (conA), conjugated with Alexa Fluor-488 (C11252, Thermo Fisher), for 30 min in dark. After staining, the samples were washed with distilled water and visualized at 100× magnification. The surface of the biofilm was calculated using ImageJ 1.52 with program package COMSTAT 2.0.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was applied to estimate the presence and relative abundance of anammox bacteria in intact samples. For hybridization, 16S rRNA-specific Cy-3-labelled oligonucleotide probe amx368 (provided by “Syntol”, Russia) was used. Hybridization was carried out at a temperature of 46 °C according to the standard procedure [47], with modifications [48,49].
Phase contrast and epifluorescence microscopy were carried out using a phase contrast microscope Leitz (Germany) with a Zeiss 20 filter for Cy3-labeled probes, with a digital camera Nikon DS-Fi1c (Japan) at 100 × 10 magnification.

2.8. Calculations and Correlation Analysis

Ammonium and nitrite nitrogen consumption rate v(N) was calculated according to Equation (1):
v N = c N init . c N fin . t
where
c(N)init. and c(N)fin.—initial and final concentrations of nitrite or ammonium nitrogen in the incubation medium, mg N/L,
t—incubation time, day.
N-NO2/N-NH4 index was calculated using Equation (2):
N NO 2 / N NH 4   index   = c N NO 2 init . c N NO 2 fin . c N NH 4 init . c N NH 4 fin .
where
c(N-NO2)init. and c(N-NO2)fin.—the initial and final concentrations of nitrite nitrogen in the incubation medium, mg N/L,
c(N-NH4)init. and c(N-NH4)fin.—the initial and final concentrations of ammonium nitrogen in the incubation medium, mg N/L.
The coefficient (coeff.) of changes in biofouling area and ammonium uptake in the bioaugmentation mode was calculated by dividing the parameter values obtained in the bioaugmentation mode (Xbioaug.) by the corresponding parameter values obtained without bioaugmentation (Xindig.), according to Equation (3).
coeff . = X bioaug . X indig .
Correlation analysis and graphical visualization of the calculations were carried out using the program Origin Pro 2021b.

3. Results

3.1. Composition of the Indigenous Anammox Community

The composition of the microbial community based on the 16S rRNA sequencing is represented in Figure 1. The most numerous bacteria in the sample from the aquifer were representatives of the Pseudomonas genus of the Pseudomonadaceae family. This genus is metabolically versatile and is known for its ability for nitrification, aerobic and anaerobic denitrification, assimilative sulfate reduction, and reduction of heavy metal ions [50,51]. Pseudomonas possesses an active quorum sensing system (QS), which is known to regulate biofilm formation and the production of extracellular DNA and large surface proteins and surfactants [52].
Among the Planctomycetes, the most abundant was the family Scalinduaceae—genus Candidatus Scalindua. These bacteria are responsible for the anammox process in the community. Members of this family are typically found in seawater; they are considered to be halophilic bacteria, in some cases, phychrotolerant [53]. Ca. Scalindua was previously reported to inhabit soil and groundwater communities, though its abundance was not as high as that of other anammox genera [53,54,55].
Members of the genus Pantoea (family Erwiniaceae) are predominantly facultative anaerobes, and are able to combine the oxidation of acetate or H2 and the reduction of different electron acceptors including Fe(III), Mn(IV), Cr(VI), and As(V) [56,57].
Members of the genus Paenibacillus (family Paenibacillaceae) are organotrophic aerobic or facultative anaerobic bacteria. Some of them are capable of metal reduction (for instance, Fe(III)) and uranium immobilization. Presumably, they could be responsible for exopolysaccharide matrix synthesis in biofilm [58,59]. Some representatives of this genus could also be involved in N-cycling processes since they carry out N2 fixation [60]. Another important feature is their ability to participate in the solubilization of phosphate-containing minerals, which can promote the growth of anammox bacteria and other microorganisms of the studied community [61].
Members of the Devosiaceae family may also be involved in nitrogen transformation in the community. Most of the Devosiaceae are organotrophs capable of nitrification [62] and the subsequent reduction of nitrite to nitric oxide during denitrification [63]. Moreover, some members of the genus Devosia possess a nirB gene, which is responsible for nitrite reduction to ammonium (D. insengisoli, according to the Kegg pathway module https://www.genome.jp/pathway/dea00910 accessed on 23 August 2022).
Most of the known members of the genus Aeromonas (family Aeromonadaceae) are mesophilic microorganisms performing heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification at high pH levels. Some of them also reduce iron (III) and carry out assimilative sulfate reduction [64,65].

3.2. Bioaugmenting Anammox Community

Figure 2 represents the composition of the microbial community of the anammox reactor, which was described previously [22,66]. The key microbial group in that community was anammox bacteria. The dominant anammox phylotype belonged to the genus Ca. Kuenenia. Members of the genera Ca. Jettenia and Ca. Brocadia represent the minor part of the anammox community. Interestingly, the results obtained demonstrate a change in the composition of anammox bacteria in the community. Thus, according to a previously published metagenomic review, this community was dominated by Ca. Jettenia [66], but then they were replaced by Ca. Kuenenia, which was previously less numerous, together with Ca. Brocadia, accounting for less than 5% each [22].
Phylum Chloroflexi (family Anaerolineaceae) appears to be one of the most abundant in this community. Members of this group are ubiquitous in such communities and are considered to play an important role in granulation [67,68]. Some of them also could be involved in N-transformation in the bioreactor, together with denitrifying members of the families Burkholderiaceae and Hyphomicrobiaceae, which are also present in the community [68,69,70,71]. In addition, the community included another important participant of the N-cycling-aerobic ammonia-oxidizing Nitrosomonas, which is often abundant in anammox bioreactors and can even co-exist in granules with anammox bacteria [72,73,74]. Members of the phylum Bacteroidota (families Chitinophagaceae, Kapabacteriales, and Microscillaceae) are an essential part of the community. Their presence is considered to be important for the functioning of such a community and their abundance is usually high [68,72,75,76]. Most of them are organotrophs, but some are involved in nitrogen reduction processes [73,75].
Other widespread Planctomycetes include the family Phycisphaeraceae, which are not associated with the anammox process but are responsible for the decomposition of organic matter and have previously been found in the same marine sediment community with anammox bacteria [77,78].

3.3. Microscopy of Indigenous and Bioaugmentation Anammox Community

Results of the phase contrast (Figure 3A,C) and fluorescent (Figure 3B,D) microscopy of the indigenous groundwater community and the biomass of the laboratory reactor (bioaugmenting community) demonstrate the presence and activity of anammox bacteria in both communities. Both communities consist of clustered microbial cells of various morphology, mostly cocci, bacilli, and some filamentous cells. Due to the dense clusterization, the quantitative analysis of the hybridized anammox cells was not performed. Anammox cells hybridized with a specific FISH probe formed microcolonies of several cells with a diameter of 5–25 µm. The size of the microcolonies presumably indicates the stage of development of the microcolonies. In the groundwater community, only young (i.e., small) microcolonies were found. The relative number of anammox bacteria in the bioaugmenting community was more than 50% of the total number of microbial cells, while in the indigenous community of groundwater, the relative number of anammox cells was less than 15%.

3.4. Effect of Mineral Carriers on the Performance of the Indigenous Anammox Community

The results of measuring the respiratory activity, the area of biofouling, and the rates of nitrogen consumption are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The maximum respiratory activity was observed on clays HB, KS3, and KS1 on zeolite Z1 and illite. Compared to these materials, the respiratory activity on polymineral rocks was significantly lower. Minimal respiratory activity was observed on quartz, zeolite Z2, sand, and vermiculite. At the same time, in our other works, it was shown that the biofouling of vermiculite can be quite high [5,38]. An assessment of the total area of the polysaccharide biofilm showed that minimal biofouling was observed on quartz, sand, zeolite Z2, and KS1; on other materials, biofouling was more than 50%.
The consumption rates of ammonium and nitrite, as well as the ratio of consumed ammonium and nitrite nitrogen (N-NO2/N-NH4), are shown in Figure 5. According to the canonical equation of the anammox process, N-NO2/N-NH4 is 1.32 and, according to the updated data, 1.146 [79]. At the same time, it is known that this ratio can vary from 0.8 to 2.0 and higher [80]. Thus, when the N-NO2/N-NH4 is in this range, we can assume a greater contribution of the anammox process to the total removal of nitrogen in the system, and with a significant deviation from these values, an increase in the contribution of such processes as denitrification or nitrification can be possible.
It has been established that not in all cases a high degree of biofouling correlates with the occurrence of the anammox process. Thus, on quartz with a low biofouling area and low rates of ammonium and nitrite consumption, according to N-NO2/N-NH4, the process was most likely carried out by anammox bacteria. On ilite (IL), a high biofouling area was observed throughout the experiment, and the process of nitrite and ammonium consumption was of medium intensity, while, according to N-NO2/N-NH4, it was also probably carried out by anammox bacteria. On kaolin clays (KC1, KC2), a high value of respiratory activity, moderate biofouling, and the rate of consumption of nitrite and ammonium were revealed.
Judging by the ratio N-NO2/N-NH4, the main removal of nitrogen can be carried out by anammox bacteria. At the same time, on kaolin clay (KC3), the highest fouling area, a high nitrite consumption rate, moderate respiratory activity, and low ammonium consumption rate were observed. According to the N-NO2/N-NH4, the main process of nitrogen removal carried out was likely due to denitrifying bacteria, with a smaller contribution of anammox bacteria. On bentonite clays BC1 and BC2, a high value of the fouling area and the rate of consumption of nitrite were revealed; anammox bacteria could make a significant contribution to nitrogen removal according to the N-NO2/N-NH4. On bentonite clay BC3, a high value of the fouling area and the rate of nitrite consumption, a moderate respiratory activity, and a low ammonium removal rate were observed. According to N-NO2/N-NH4, both anammox and denitrifying bacteria contributed to nitrogen removal.
On activated Khakasskiy bentonite (BC4), a high fouling area and respiratory activity, and moderate rates of ammonium and nitrite consumption were observed. According to the N-NO2/N-NH4, anammox bacteria may have played a significant role in the process of nitrogen consumption. On the CHMZ rock, a high value of all indicators was found, except for respiratory activity. This is probably due to the fact that anaerobic anammox bacteria developed in this case. On the B2 rock, high values of the fouling area and nitrite consumption rate, and low values of respiratory activity and ammonium consumption rate were found, which is probably due to the predominance of denitrifying microorganisms in the microbial community along with anammox bacteria. On vermiculite (V and expanded clay), a high value of the fouling area and low values of all other indicators were found. On zeolite (Z1), high values of all indicators were revealed. It can be concluded that this material is well suited for the development of bacteria involved in the nitrogen cycle. Presumably, anammox bacteria were also present in this community. Zeolite (Z2) showed low fouling area, respiratory activity, and rate of nitrite and ammonium consumption. According to the N-NO2/N-NH4 ratio, the presence of anammox bacteria on this carrier was insufficient.

3.5. Effect of Bioaugmentation with a “Warm” Anammox Community

The results of carrier biofouling in the bioaugmentation mode are shown in Figure 6, and the main differences from the indigenous anammox community are shown in Table 4.
The addition of the “warm” anammox community from the laboratory reactor led to an increase in nitrogen consumption and the total area of biofouling on IL, KC2, KC3, BC1, BC3, HB, S, and Z2. The greatest increase in NH4 consumption was observed on B2 rock (by 7.7 times), then KC2 (by 2.8 times), and EC (by 2.4 times), the rest were less pronounced. Surprisingly, Q, KC1, BC2, and especially CHMZ rock (0.2 times), showed signs of inhibition in the activity of the “warm” anammox community, since ammonium consumption after bioaugmentation was lower than by the indigenous anammox community. A tendency to increase the area of biofouling with a decrease in nitrogen consumption was observed on KC1, BC2, and CHMZ rock. At the same time, on B2 rock, V, and EC, an increase in nitrogen consumption was noted with a decrease in the area of biofouling. It should be noted that in the bioaugmentation mode, according to the ratio of consumed N-NO2 to N-NH4, the contribution of the anammox process to nitrogen removal was maximal on KC1, BC1, BC3, CHMZ, B2, Z1, and Z2.

4. Discussion

The microbial composition of the two communities varied remarkably from each other. Anammox bacteria were present in both communities. Genus Ca. Scalindua, which was found in the groundwater community, is a typical anammox inhabitant of natural ecosystems such as seawater, sediments, and soils [54,55,81]. At the same time, the bioaugmenting community included anammox bacteria of the family Brocadiaceae, which is usually associated with anthropogenic habitats. In addition, this community included other microbial participants in the N-cycle and bacteria important for the functioning of wastewater treatment communities and biofilm formation [68,72]. This composition of the microbial community is a result of long-term cultivation under favorable laboratory conditions [18,19,66]. Some of the phylotypes from the groundwater community also could be involved in nitrogen transformations, and some phylotypes are associated with groundwater habitats, including contaminated groundwater [82,83].
Currently, one of the most intensively studied ways to stimulate the growth of biofilms in the anammox community, to increase specific anammox activity or maintain it under adverse environmental conditions, is the application of special carriers. This area of research is still developing, but it is already known that carriers of different natures can have different effects on the anammox process [84,85]. According to our results, zeolite, ChMZ aquifer rock, illite, and kaolin clays turned out to be the most suitable carriers for creating a permeable nitrogen removal barrier. These results are consistent with our previous study in which we used a microbial community from a “warm” anammox reactor and the incubation temperature was high (30 °C) [6]. The intensity of biofouling of mineral carriers by microorganisms depends on a number of factors. One of the most important is the presence of biogenic elements in them and their availability for microorganisms. Another is the features of the surface of the material: morphology, charge, the presence of free functional groups, etc.
To assess the effect of the elemental composition on the process of nitrogen removal and biofilm formation by the anammox community, a correlation analysis was performed. The results are shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7 reflects a weak positive relationship between the biofilm growth of both bioaugmented and indigenous microbial communities and the content of aluminum, potassium, and calcium in the carrier materials. There is a weak positive correlation between the removal of ammonium by the indigenous microbial community with the presence of silicon and calcium, and for a bioaugmented community—only with silicon. N-NO2/N-NH4 in the case of the indigenous microbial community has a strong positive correlation with magnesium, and one weaker with iron. For the bioaugmented microbial community, a strong positive correlation of N-NO2/N-NH4 with potassium and phosphorus, essential biogenic elements, was observed. It was shown that the addition of various metal cations has a positive effect on the vital activity of anammox bacteria: K+, Fe2+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ ions help anammox bacteria to remain active under conditions of high salinity. The mechanism is associated with the synthesis of an additional amount of the extracellular polymeric matrix of granules [86]. Positively charged cations can also bind to a negatively charged cell surface, thereby stimulating granulation [87]. Iron seems to be the most important cation, and a stimulating effect on granulation, biofilm growth, anammox activity, and total nitrogen removal by the bioreactor community was noted for both Fe2+ and Fe3+ [65,74,87]. In long-term experiments, the addition of iron cations increased the anammox activity by up to 20% compared to the control [88]. Fe2+ is needed for redox reactions and electron transfer reactions in metabolic processes [89]. At the same time, an excess concentration of cations can adversely affect the anammox community, inducing the synthesis of smaller granules and even a decrease in anammox activity [90,91]. For example, components such as K2O and P2O5 showed a low negative correlation with both ammonium and nitrite consumption by the indigenous anammox community (Figure 7).
A weak correlation was noted for the process of ammonium removal by the bioaugmented microbial community with the following elements in the composition of mineral carriers: magnesium oxide, aluminum, potassium, iron, and phosphorus. The inverse relationship between aluminum and phosphate compounds is due to the sedimentation process [92]. It is also known that prolonged exposure of the anammox community to aluminum oxide affects the activity of all three key enzymes of the anammox process and the level of the key functional gene of anammox bacteria HzsA [93].
In the case of clays, the high intensity of biofouling compared to more crystallized minerals can be explained by the presence of a large and mobile interplanar distance containing biogenic elements such as Fe, K, Mg, Ca, and P. The ability of bentonite clays and illite to strongly swell in water leads to a strong increase in the interplanar distance, which increases the availability of elements for microorganisms. In kaolin clays, this ability was not so pronounced; therefore, in this case, the presence of impurity biogenic elements in the structure was the decisive factor. The fouling of illite is primarily due to the presence of potassium and iron in it. The high fouling of clays may be associated with their ability to accumulate ammonium ions (which is especially true for montmorillonite clays and vermiculite [94]), reducing their negative effect on microorganisms at elevated concentrations.
Biofouling of the loams of the ChMZ and B2 aquifers was connected with their polymineral composition. For example, potassium feldspars and clays can serve as a source of potassium, while clays, amorphous iron oxides, and ferruginous minerals, such as siderite, can serve as a source of iron. The greater intensity of fouling of the ChMZ rock, compared to the B2 rock by anammox bacteria, can be associated with a high content of available iron and potassium from clay minerals and potassium feldspar in the latter. This creates an advantage for the growth of fast-growing non-anammox bacteria that compete with them. At the same time, the intensity of respiration and the total area of the biofilm on the B2 and ChMZ rocks were close to each other. In the bioaugmentation mode, due to the increased concentration of anammox bacteria, anammox bacteria developed on both samples according to the N-NO2/N-NH4 ratio.
Zeolite biofouling is due to its high sorption capacity for many elements (K, Fe, etc.) and ability to accumulate water-like clays. However, the activity of microbial processes on Z1 is stronger than on Z2. Most likely, this is due to the fact that the iron in Z2 is in a reduced form, which cannot be used under reducing conditions. Expanded clay used in the work is a product of the calcination of kaolin clays; that is, it may contain elements necessary for microorganisms, along with high porosity and the ability to retain water, which also favors the growth of the microbial community. Poor fouling of Q and S is associated with the dominance of quartz in their composition and the low content of biogenic elements in them.
Not in all cases, a high degree of biofouling of the carrier can be associated with the successful removal of oxidized and reduced forms of nitrogen. It is possible that the high area of fouling of some carriers creates conditions for competition between anammox bacteria and other groups of bacteria. In our opinion, the decrease in nitrogen consumption on some carriers with a high specific surface area (expanded clay, vermiculite, and zeolite-containing tripoli) can be explained by biofouling by more rapidly growing microorganisms compared to anammox bacteria.
Thus, for biofouling by anammox bacteria, it is not necessary to use a material with a high specific surface area, such as expanded clay. First of all, it is important to choose a material that (1) will contain the elements necessary for anammox bacteria, and (2) will not provide advantages for the rapid development of bacteria of other groups.
Overall, bioaugmentation of cold groundwater with a “warm” anammox community improved nitrogen removal rates and biofilm formation on most of the used mineral carriers. The observed lower anammox activity after bioaugmentation in the presence of some mineral carriers may be due to inhibition by some mineral components or to other possible factors associated with these mineral carriers, e.g., an unsuitable surface for biofilm formation. Another and/or additional explanation of this observation could be the combination of the cold shock factor for the “warm” bioaugmenting community and inhibition that led to the decay of the “warm” anammox community and the release of ammonium into the medium.
Despite the initial positive results obtained in this work, further research is needed to improve the process of sustainable bioremediation of polluted underground ecosystems. Great potential lies in using cheap organic substrates or organic carbon-rich wastewater to combine the partial denitrification process, which produces nitrite, and the anammox process, which converts nitrite and ammonium into harmless molecular nitrogen. The effectiveness of this approach for the treatment of wastewater containing both ammonium and nitrate nitrogen using the anammox process has been experimentally confirmed in numerous works [95,96,97,98,99], but it has not previously been shown to treat groundwater. The rate limiting of the anammox process due to low temperature can be overcome by the preliminary adaptation of a “warm” anammox community to cold temperatures before bioaugmentation into an aquifer. One of the possible ways to both accumulate a sufficient amount of anammox biomass for bioaugmentation and adapt a “warm” anammox community to cold is to use a pilot bioreactor near the bioaugmentation wells. The reactor should be maintained at a temperature of 15–20 °C as a compromise between the moderate anammox biomass growth rate and cold adaptation, and fed with a mineral medium with a gradual increase in the proportion of groundwater with the addition of ammonium nitrogen and some cheap sources of organic carbon (e.g., molasses) to ensure stable nitrite production from partial denitrification. The anammox biomass obtained in this way can be simultaneously adapted to hazardous compounds contained in polluted groundwater. However, it should be taken into account that the current methods of adaptation of a “warm” anammox community to low temperatures (10–15 °C) take months or even years. Techniques such as cold shock [100,101] or gradual acclimation and cold shocks [102] have been shown to be promising. A feasibility study of these methods may also be the focus of future work on sustainable bioremediation of cold polluted groundwater ecosystems through bioaugmentation.

5. Conclusions

The development of biofilms under conditions of oxidative and nitrate stress in low-temperature underground habitats is a necessary factor in the anammox process. The results of the work can be summarized in the following main conclusions:
  • Quartz and kaolin clays of the Kantatskoye and Kamalinskoye deposits, bentonite clay of the Berezovskoye deposit, and zeolite of the Kholinskoye deposit can be used as components of a permeable barrier in the removal of ammonium and nitrite nitrogen in situ in the anammox process using an indigenous cold anammox community dominated by Ca. Scalindua.
  • It can be assumed that the activity of the anammox process is determined by a number of factors, including the presence of the necessary trace elements in the material, the features of the surface morphology, as well as competition with other groups of organisms that can develop on materials at a faster rate.
  • Bioaugmentation with a “warm” anammox community with a predominance of Ca. Kuenenia resulted in improved nitrogen removal on most carriers, including bentonite clay of the Dinozavrovoye deposit, loamy rock, and zeolite-containing tripoli, in addition to carriers that perform best with the indigenous anammox community. To further enhance the anammox process in a cold, nitrate-rich underground habitat, research is needed on the feasibility of coupled partial denitrification–anammox and the adaptation of a “warm” anammox community to low temperatures and hazardous compounds contained in polluted groundwater.
  • Biofouling of loamy aquifers is due to their polymineral composition. For example, potassium feldspars and clays can serve as a source of potassium, while clays, amorphous iron oxides, and ferruginous minerals, such as siderite, can serve as a source of iron. It is important to note that biofouling by bacteria carrying out the anammox process on the ChMZ rock was quite successful, which suggests that under optimal conditions, the anammox process is possible in situ in the polluted aquifer.
  • It can be assumed that when polymineral rocks are overgrown with anammox bacteria, competition with more rapidly developing bacteria can take place. Thus, for biofouling by anammox bacteria, it is not necessary to use a mineral carrier with a high area, such as expanded clay. However, it is necessary to select a carrier that will contain the elements necessary for anammox bacteria, while not providing advantages for the rapid development of bacteria of other groups.
It should be noted that, in addition to the removal of nitrogen, biofouling of mineral carriers in the permeable barrier system is important for the immobilization of metals in cases of multicomponent contamination. Thus, biofouling of rocks in aquifers leads to an increase in the immobilization of actinides [103], and biofouling of zeolite leads to an increase in the efficiency of the immobilization of heavy metals [5,104].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11101421/s1, Figure S1: Location of sampling sites of the mineral carriers used in the current study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and A.S.; methodology, A.V., N.P. and G.A.; formal analysis, E.B. and A.S.; investigation, A.V., N.P. and G.A.; resources, Y.L. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.P., E.B., Y.L. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and Y.L.; visualization, N.P.; supervision, A.S.; project administration, Y.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation project No. 22-24-00701, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-24-00701/.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Strous, M.; Heijnen, J.; Kuenen, J.; Jetten, M.S.M. The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 50, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Botchkova, E.A.; Litti, Y.V.; Kuznetsov, B.B.; Nozhevnikova, A.N. Microbial biofilms formed in a laboratory-scale anammox bioreactor with flexible brush carrier. J. Biomater. Nanobiotechnol. 2014, 5, 44392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, J.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Wu, L.; Peng, Y. Mechanism of stable sewage nitrogen removal in a partial nitrification-anammox biofilm system at low temperatures: Microbial community and EPS analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tian, X.; Schopf, A.; Amaral-Stewart, B.; Christensson, M.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; St-Pierre, J.-P.; Vincent, S.; Mercier, E.; Zhang, X.; Delatolla, R. Carrier surface modification for enhanced attachment and growth of anammox biofilm. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 811, 151317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Safonov, A.; Popova, N.; Andrushenko, N.; Boldyrev, K.; Yushin, N.; Zinicovscaia, I. Investigation of materials for reactive permeable barrier in removing cadmium and chromium (VI) from aquifer near a solid domestic waste landfll. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 4645–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Popova, N.; Vishnyakova, A.; Artemiev, G.; Sitanskaia, A.; Litti, Y.; Safonov, A. Biofilms of anammox bacteria on mineral carriers to establish a subterranean permeable barrier. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cao, Y.; van Loosdrecht, M.; Daigger, G.T. Mainstream partial nitritation–anammox in municipal wastewater treatment: Status, bottlenecks, and further studies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 1365–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lotti, T.; Kleerebezem, R.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Effect of temperature change on anammox activity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kouba, V.; Bachmannová, C.; Podzimek, T.; Lipovova, P.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Physiology of anammox adaptation to low temperatures and promising biomarkers: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 394, 126847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, H.; Jin, R.C. Summary of the preservation techniques and the evolution of the anammox bacteria characteristics during preservation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 4349–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sobotka, D.; Zhai, J.; Makinia, J. Generalized temperature dependence model for anammox process kinetics. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lotti, T.; Kleerebezem, R.; Abelleira-Pereira, J.M.; Abbas, B.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Faster through training: The anammox case. Water Res. 2015, 81, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dosta, J.; Fernández, I.; Vázquez-Padín, J.R.; Mosquera-Corral, A.; Campos, J.L.; Mata-Alvarez, J.; Méndez, R. Short-and long-term effects of temperature on the Anammox process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 688–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Canion, A.; Kostka, J.E.; Gihring, T.M.; Huettel, M.; van Beusekom, J.E.E.; Gao, H.; Lavik, G.; Kuypers, M.M.M. Temperature response of denitrification and anammox reveals the adaptation of microbial communities to in situ temperatures in permeable marine sediments that span 50 in latitude. Biogeosciences 2014, 11, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rysgaard, S.; Glud, R.N.; Risgaard-Petersen, N.; Dalsgaard, T. Denitrification and anammox activity in Arctic marine sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2004, 49, 1493–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thamdrup, B.; Dalsgaard, T. Production of N2 through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction in marine sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 68, 1312–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tribelli, P.M.; López, N.I. Reporting key features in cold-adapted bacteria. Life 2018, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, E.; Chena, J.; Jiang, Z.; Deng, Z.; Tu, Z.; Wang, H.; Wu, S.; Kong, Z.; Hendrik Sanjaya, E.; Chen, H. Insights into rapidly recover-ing the autotrophic nitrogen removal performance of single-stage partial nitritation-anammox systems: Reconstructing granular sludge and its functional microbes synergy. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 361, 127750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, H.; Yu, G.; He, W.; Du, C.; Deng, Z.; Wang, D.; Yang, M.; Yang, E.; Zhou, Y.; Sanjaya, E.H.; et al. Enhancing autotrophic ni-trogen removal with a novel dissolved oxygen-differentiated airlift internal circulation reactor: Long-term operational perfor-mance and microbial characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 296, 113271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, H.; Chen, C.; Yang, E.; Tu, Z.; Liang, J.; Dai, X.; Chen, H. Revealing the effect of biofilm formation in partial nitrita-tion-anammox systems: Start-up, performance stability, and recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 357, 127379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Madeira, C.L.; de Araújo, J.C. Inhibition of anammox activity by municipal and industrial wastewater pollutants: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 799, 149449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pimenov, N.V.; Nikolaev, Y.A.; Dorofeev, A.G.; Grachev, V.A.; Kallistova, A.Y.; Kanapatskii, T.A.; Litti, Y.V.; Gruzdev, E.V.; Begmatov, S.A.; Ravin, N.V.; et al. Introduction of Exogenous Activated Sludge as a Way to Enhance the Efficiency of Nitrogen Removal in the Anammox Process. Microbiology 2022, 91, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pimenov, N.V.; Nikolaev, Y.A.; Dorofeev, A.G.; Grachev, V.A.; Kallistova, A.Y.; Mironov, V.V.; Vanteeva, A.V.; Grigor’Eva, N.V.; Berestovskaya, Y.Y.; Gruzdev, E.V.; et al. Bioaugmentation of Anammox Activated Sludge with a Nitrifying Bacterial Community as a Way to Increase the Nitrogen Removal Efficiency. Microbiology 2022, 91, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miao, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; Li, B.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, M.; Peng, Y. Characterization of EPS compositions and microbial community in an Anammox SBBR system treating landfill leachate. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, P.; Ma, L.; Chen, J.; Wang, C.; Li, X.; Liu, W.; Xu, L. Hydroxylamine metabolism in mainstream denitrifying ammonium oxidation (DEAMOX) process: Achieving fast start-up and robust operation with bio-augmentation assistance under ambient temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 421, 126736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wett, B.; Podmirseg, S.M.; Gómez-Brandón, M.; Hell, M.; Nyhuis, G.; Bott, C.; Murthy, S. Expanding DEMON sidestream deammonification technology towards mainstream application. Water Environ. Res. 2015, 87, 2084–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, B.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; Peng, Y. Enhancing ammonium oxidizing bacteria activity was key to single-stage partial nitrification-anammox system treating low-strength sewage under intermittent aeration condition. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 231, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jin, R.C.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Liu, J.H.; Yang, B.E.; Guo, L.X.; Wang, H.Z. Bio-augmentation for mitigating the impact of transient oxytetracycline shock on anaerobic ammonium oxidation (ANAMMOX) performance. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 163, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Q.Q.; Yang, G.F.; Sun, K.K.; Tian, G.M.; Jin, R.C. Insights into the effects of bio-augmentation on the granule-based anammox process under continuous oxytetracycline stress: Performance and microflora structure. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 348, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, W.; Van Tendeloo, M.; Alloul, A.; Vlaeminck, S.E. Towards mainstream partial nitritation/anammox in four seasons: Feasibility of bioaugmentation with stored summer sludge for winter anammox assistance. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 347, 126619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. El Fantroussi, S.; Agathos, S.N. Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005, 8, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, F.; Deng, D.; Zeng, L.; Abrams, S.; Li, M. Sequential anaerobic and aerobic bioaugmentation for commingled groundwater contamination of trichloroethene and 1, 4-dioxane. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Michalsen, M.M.; King, A.S.; Istok, J.D.; Crocker, F.H.; Fuller, M.E.; Kucharzyk, K.H.; Gander, M.J. Spatially-distinct redox conditions and degradation rates following field-scale bioaugmentation for RDX-contaminated groundwater remediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 387, 121529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Michalsen, M.M.; King, A.S.; Rule, R.A.; Fuller, M.E.; Hatzinger, P.B.; Condee, C.W.; Crocker, F.H.; Indest, K.J.; Jung, C.M.; Istok, J.D. Evaluation of biostimulation and bioaugmentation to stimulate hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5,-triazine degradation in an aerobic groundwater aquifer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 7625–7632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Poi, G.; Shahsavari, E.; Aburto-Medina, A.; Mok, P.C.; Ball, A.S. Large scale treatment of total petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater using bioaugmentation. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 214, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Demenev, A.; Maksimovich, N.; Khmurchik, V.; Rogovskiy, G.; Rogovskiy, A.; Baryshnikov, A. Field Test of In Situ Groundwater Treatment Applying Oxygen Diffusion and Bioaugmentation Methods in an Area with Sustained Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) Contaminant Flow. Water 2022, 14, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dominika, G.; Joanna, M.; Jacek, M. Sulfate reducing ammonium oxidation (SULFAMMOX) process under anaerobic conditions. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Safonov, A.V.; Andryushchenko, N.D.; Ivanov, P.V.; Boldyrev, K.A.; Babich, T.L.; German, K.E.; Zakharova, E.V. Biogenic factors of radionuclide immobilization on sandy rocks of upper aquifers. Radiochemistry 2019, 61, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Opdyke, S.M.; Evans, J.C. Slag-Cement-Bentonite Slurry Walls. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2005, 131, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abramova, E.; Popova, N.; Artemiev, G.; Zharkova, V.; Zakharova, E.; Safonov, A. Characteristics and rates of microbial processes in clays of different mineral and elemental composition in relation to safety prediction for ESB clay materials. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gohl, D.M.; MacLean, A.; Hauge, A.; Becker, A.; Walek, D.; Beckman, K.B. An optimized protocol for high-throughput amplicon-based microbiome profiling. Protoc. Exch. 2016, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hugerth, L.W.; Wefer, H.A.; Lundin, S.; Jakobsson, H.E.; Lindberg, M.; Rodin, S.; Engstrand, L.; Andersson, A.F. DegePrime, a program for degenerate primer design for broad-taxonomic-range PCR in microbial ecology studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5116–5123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Merkel, A.Y.; Tarnovetskii, I.Y.; Podosokorskaya, O.A.; Toshchakov, S.V. Analysis of 16S rRNA Primer Systems for Profiling of Thermophilic Microbial Communities. Microbiology 2019, 88, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S.P. Dada2: High-resolution sample inference from illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chong, J.; Liu, P.; Zhou, G.; Xia, J. Using MicrobiomeAnalyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nat. Protoc. 2020, 15, 799–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amann, R.I.; Ludwig, W.; Schleifer, K.H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 55, 143–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Botchkova, E.A.; Litti, Y.V.; Novikov, A.A.; Grouzdev, D.S.; Bochkareva, E.S.; Beskorovayny, A.V.; Kuznetsov, B.B.; Nozhevnikova, A.N. Description of “Candidatus Jettenia ecosi” sp. nov., a new species of anammox bacteria. Microbiology 2018, 87, 766–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vishnyakova, A.V.; Litti, Y.V.; Botchkova, E.A.; Ermoshin, A.A.; Nozhevnikova, A.N. Changes in Relative Abundance of Microbial Groups Involved in Nitrogen Removal in the Anammox–Partial Nitrification Reactor System at Increase in Ammonium Nitrogen and COD Load. Microbiology 2020, 89, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rajta, A.; Bhatia, R.; Setia, H.; Pathania, P. Role of heterotrophic aerobic denitrifying bacteria in nitrate removal from wastewater. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 1261–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arisah, F.M.; Amir, A.F.; Ramli, N.; Ariffin, H.; Maeda, T.; Hassan, M.A.; Yusoff, M.Z.M. Bacterial Resistance against Heavy Metals in Pseudomonas aeruginosa RW9 Involving Hexavalent Chromium Removal. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fazli, M.; Almblad, H.; Rybtke, M.L.; Givskov, M.; Eberl, L.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Regulation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1961–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, J.; Gu, J.D. Dominance of Candidatus Scalindua species in anammox community revealed in soils with different duration of rice paddy cultivation in Northeast China. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 1785–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lincy, J.; Manohar, C.S. 16S rRNA and hydrazine gene-based profiling of the Candidatus Scalindua community from the Arabian Sea hypoxic sediment. Curr. Sci. 2021, 120, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Awata, T.; Oshiki, M.; Kindaichi, T.; Ozaki, N.; Ohashi, A.; Okabe, S. Physiological Characterization of an Anaerobic Ammonium-Oxidizing Bacterium Belonging to the “Candidatus Scalindua” Group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 4145–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Francis, C.A.; Obraztsova, A.Y.; Tebo, B.M. Dissimilatory metal reduction by the facultative anaerobe Pantoea agglomerans SP1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, Q.; Du, J.; Zhuang, G.; Jing, C. Bacillus sp. SXB and Pantoea sp. IMH, aerobic As(V)-reducing bacteria isolated from arsenic-contaminated soil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ahmed, B.; Cao, B.; McLean, J.S.; Ica, T.; Dohnalkova, A.; Istanbullu, O.; Paksoy, A.; Fredrickson, J.K.; Beyenal, H. Fe(III) reduction and U(VI) immobilization by Paenibacillus sp. strain 300A, isolated from Hanford 300A subsurface sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 8001–8009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grady, E.N.; MacDonald, J.; Liu, L.; Richman, A.; Yuan, Z.C. Current knowledge and perspectives of Paenibacillus: A review. Microb. Cell Fact. 2016, 15, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xie, J.-B.; Du, Z.; Bai, L.; Tian, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, J.-Y.; Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Cheng, Q.; et al. Comparative genomic analysis of N2-fixing and non-N2-fixing Paenibacillus spp.: Organization, evolution and expression of the nitrogen fixation genes. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, 1004231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Xie, J.; Shi, H.; Du, Z.; Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Chen, S. Comparative genomic and functional analysis reveal conservation of plant growth promoting traits in Paenibacillus polymyxa and its closely related species. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Vanparys, B.; Heylen, K.; Lebbe, L.; Vos, P.D. Devosia limi sp. nov., isolated from a nitrifying inoculums. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1997–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Falk, S.; Liu, B.; Braker, G. Isolation, genetic and functional characterization of novel soil nirK-type denitrifiers. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pham, C.A.; Jung, S.J.; Phung, N.T.; Lee, J.; Chang, I.S.; Kim, B.H.; Yi, H.; Chun, J. A novel electrochemically active and Fe(III)-reducing bacterium phylogenetically related to Aeromonas hydrophila, isolated from a microbial fuel cell. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 223, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, M.; Wang, W.; Feng, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhou, H.; Tan, Z.; Li, X. Impact resistance of different factors on ammonia removal by heterotrophic nitrification–aerobic denitrification bacterium Aeromonas sp. HN-02. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 167, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mardanov, A.V.; Beletsky, A.V.; Ravin, N.V.; Botchkova, E.A.; Litti, Y.V.; Nozhevnikova, A.N. Genome of a Novel Bacterium “Candidatus Jettenia ecosi” reconstructed from the metagenome of an anammox bioreactor. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kindaichi, T.; Yuri, S.; Ozaki, N.; Ohashi, A. Ecophysiological role and function of uncultured Chloroflexi in an anammox reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 66, 2556–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, B.; Peng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, M.; Wang, S. Illumina MiSeq sequencing reveals the key microorganisms involved in partial nitritation followed by simultaneous sludge fermentation, denitrification and anammox process. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 207, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lawson, C.E.; Wu, S.; Bhattacharjee, A.S.; Hamilton, J.J.; Mcmahon, K.D.; Goel, R.; Noguera, D.R. Metabolic network analysis reveals microbial community interactions in anammox granules. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, Y.; Niu, Q.; Wang, S.; Ji, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, M.; Hojo, T.; Li, Y.-Y. Upgrading of the symbiosis of Nitrosomanas and anammox bacteria in a novel single-stage partial nitritation–anammox system: Nitrogen removal potential and Microbial characterization. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Akaboci, T.R.; Gich, F.; Ruscalleda, M.; Balaguer, M.D.; Colprim, J. Assessment of operational conditions towards mainstream partial nitritation-anammox stability at moderate to low temperature: Reactor performance and bacterial community. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 350, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dosta, J.; Vila, J.; Sancho, I.; Basset, N.; Grifoll, M.; Mata-Álvarez, J. Two-step partial nitritation/Anammox process in granulation reactors: Start-up operation and microbial characterization. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 164, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gonzalez-Martinez, A.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, A.; Palazon, B.M.; Garcia-Ruiz, M.-J.; Osorio, F.; van Loosdrecht, M.; Gonzalez–Lopez, J. Microbial community analysis of a full-scale DEMON bioreactor. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2015, 38, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, Y.; Ni, B.-J. Appropriate Fe (II) Addition Significantly Enhances Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation (Anammox) Activity through Improving the Bacterial Growth Rate. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Xie, B.; Lv, Z.; Hu, C.; Yang, X.; Li, X. Nitrogen removal through different pathways in an aged refuse bioreactor treating mature landfill leachate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 9225–9234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, B.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Qiao, X.; Gong, X.; Gong, Q.; Liu, X.; Peng, Y. Recovering partial nitritation in a PN/A system during mainstream wastewater treatment by reviving AOB activity after thoroughly inhibiting AOB and NOB with free nitrous acid. Environ. Int. 2020, 139, 105684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jasmin, C.; Anas, A.; Tharakan, B.; Jaleel, A.; Puthiyaveettil, V.; Narayanane, S.; Lincy, J.; Nair, S. Diversity of sediment-associated Planctomycetes in the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 1010–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Toro, E.E.R.-D.; Valenzuela, E.I.; López-Lozano, N.E.; Cortés-Martínez, M.G.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, M.A.; Calvario-Martínez, O.; Sánchez-Carrillo, S.; Cervantes, F.J. Anaerobic ammonium oxidation linked to sulfate and ferric iron reduction fuels nitrogen loss in marine sediments. Biodegradation 2018, 29, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lotti, T.; Kleerebezem, R.; Lubello, C.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Physiological and kinetic characterization of a suspended cell anammox culture. Water Res. 2014, 60, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Güven, D.; van de Pas-Schoonen, K.; Schmid, M.C.; Strous, M.; Jetten, M.S.M.; Sözen, S.; Orhon, D.; Schmidt, I. Implementation of the Anammox process for improved nitrogen removal. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2004, 39, 1729–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Padhy, S.R.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Dash, P.K.; Nayak, S.K.; Baig, M.J.; Swain, P.; Mohapatra, T. Soil Metagenome Revealed Contrasting Anammox Bacterial Diversity in Coastal Mangrove and Rice Ecology. Geomicrobiol. J. 2022, 39, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tian, R.; Ning, D.; He, Z.; Zhang, P.; Spencer, S.J.; Gao, S.; Shi, W.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; et al. Small and mighty: Adaptation of superphylum Patescibacteria to groundwater environment drives their genome simplicity. Microbiome 2020, 8, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Verma, A.; Murugan, P.A.; Chinnasamy, H.V.; Singh, A.; Matheshwaran, S. Identification and Genome Analysis of an Arsenic-Metabolizing Strain of Citrobacter youngae IITK SM2 in Middle Indo-Gangetic Plain Groundwater. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 6384742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Adams, M.; Xie, J.; Xie, J.; Chang, Y.; Guo, M.; Chen, C.; Zhang, T.C. The effect of carrier addition on Anammox start-up and microbial community: A review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2020, 19, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tian, X.; Schopf, A.; Amaral-Stewart, B.; Christensson, M.; Morgan-Sagastume, F.; Vincent, S.; Delatolla, R. Anammox attachment and biofilm development on surface-modified carriers with planktonic-and biofilm-based inoculation. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 317, 124030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kim, Y.; Yu, J.; Jeong, S.; Kim, J.; Park, S.; Bae, H.; Rhee, S.-K.; Unno, T.; Ni, S.-Q.; Lee, T. Differences in the Effects of Calcium and Magnesium Ions on the Anammox Granular Properties to Alleviate Salinity Stress. Appl. Sci. 2021, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. An, P.; Xu, X.; Yang, F.; Li, Z. Comparison of the characteristics of anammox granules of different sizes. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2013, 18, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tang, S.-M.; Xu, Z.-H.; Liu, Y.-L.; Yang, G.-F.; Mu, J.; Jin, R.-C.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.-L. Performance, kinetics characteristics and enhancement mechanisms in anammox process under Fe (II) enhanced conditions. Biodegradation 2020, 31, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ferousi, C.; Lindhoud, S.; Baymann, F.; Kartal, B.; Jetten, M.S.; Reimann, J. Iron assimilation and utilization in anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 37, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Trigo, C.; Campos, J.L.; Garrido, J.M.; Mendez, R. Start-up of the Anammox process in a membrane bioreactor. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 126, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Adams, M.; Xie, J.; Kabore, A.W.J.; Chang, Y.; Xie, J.; Guo, M.; Chen, C. Research advances in anammox granular sludge: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 52, 631–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hreiz, R.; Latifi, M.A.; Roche, N. Optimal design and operation of activated sludge processes: State-of-the-art. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 281, 900–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, Z.Z.; Cheng, Y.F.; Bai, Y.H.; Xu, J.J.; Shi, Z.J.; Shen, Y.Y.; Jin, R.C. Evaluating the effects of metal oxide nanoparticles (TiO2, Al2O3, SiO2 and CeO2) on anammox process: Performance, microflora and sludge properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 266, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Mamo, M.; Taylor, R.W.; Shuford, J.W. Ammonium fixation by soil and pure clay minerals. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1993, 24, 1115–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ji, J.; Peng, Y.; Wang, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q. Synergistic partial-denitrification, anammox, and in-situ fermentation (SPDAF) process for advanced nitrogen removal from domestic and nitrate-containing wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 3702–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. You, Q.G.; Wang, J.H.; Qi, G.X.; Zhou, Y.M.; Guo, Z.W.; Shen, Y.; Gao, X. Anammox and partial denitrification coupling: A review. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 12554–12572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, M.; Wang, S.; Ji, B.; Liu, Y. Towards mainstream deammonification of municipal wastewater: Partial nitrification-anammox versus partial denitrification-anammox. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 692, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Du, R.; Peng, Y.; Ji, J.; Shi, L.; Gao, R.; Li, X. Partial denitrification providing nitrite: Opportunities of extending application for anammox. Environ. Int. 2019, 131, 105001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, H.; Tu, Z.; Wu, S.; Yu, G.; Du, C.; Wang, H.; Yang, E.; Zhou, L.; Deng, B.; Wang, D.; et al. Recent advances in partial denitrifica-tion-anaerobic ammonium oxidation process for mainstream municipal wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 2021, 278, 130436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kouba, V.; Darmal, R.; Vejmelkova, D.; Jenicek, P.; Bartacek, J. Cold shocks of Anammox biofilm stimulate nitrogen removal at low temperatures. Biotechnol. Prog. 2018, 34, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kouba, V.; Gerlein, J.C.; Benakova, A.; Lopez Marin, M.A.; Rysava, E.; Vejmelkova, D.; Bartacek, J. Adaptation of flocculent anammox culture to low temperature by cold shock: Long-term response of the microbial population. Environ. Technol. 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Kouba, V.; Vejmelkova, D.; Zwolsman, E.; Hurkova, K.; Navratilova, K.; Laureni, M.; Vodickova, P.; Podzimek, T.; Hajslova, J.; Pabst, M.; et al. Adaptation of anammox bacteria to low temperature via gradual acclimation and cold shocks: Distinctions in protein expression, membrane composition and activities. Water Res. 2022, 209, 117822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Safonov, A.; Popova, N.; Boldyrev, K.; Lavrinovich, E.; Boeva, N.; Artemiev, G.; Kuzovkina, E.; Emelyanov, A.; Myasnikov, I.; Zakharova, E.; et al. The microbial impact on U, Pu, Np, and Am immobilization on aquifer sandy rocks, collected at the deep LRW injection site. J. Geochem. Explor. 2022, 240, 107052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zinicovscaia, I.; Yushin, N.; Grozdov, D.; Vergel, K.; Popova, N.; Artemiev, G.; Safonov, A. Metal Removal from Nickel-Containing Effluents Using Mineral–Organic Hybrid Adsorbent. Materials 2020, 13, 4462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Taxonomic diversity of the microbial community from the water-bearing horizon on the family and genus level, based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Figure 1. Taxonomic diversity of the microbial community from the water-bearing horizon on the family and genus level, based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Biology 11 01421 g001
Figure 2. Taxonomic diversity of a “warm” anammox bioreactor community at the family and genus level, based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Figure 2. Taxonomic diversity of a “warm” anammox bioreactor community at the family and genus level, based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Biology 11 01421 g002
Figure 3. Phase-contrast (A,C) and fluorescent (B,D) microscopic images of microbial communities of groundwater (A,B) and a laboratory bioreactor (C,D). Scale bar 10 µm.
Figure 3. Phase-contrast (A,C) and fluorescent (B,D) microscopic images of microbial communities of groundwater (A,B) and a laboratory bioreactor (C,D). Scale bar 10 µm.
Biology 11 01421 g003
Figure 4. The area of biofouling of carriers by the indigenous microbial community, % according to confocal microscopy studies (A) and MTT assay (B).
Figure 4. The area of biofouling of carriers by the indigenous microbial community, % according to confocal microscopy studies (A) and MTT assay (B).
Biology 11 01421 g004
Figure 5. The ratio of consumed ammonium and nitrite nitrogen (N-NO2/N-NH4) (A) and ammonium and nitrite uptake rates (B) on mineral carriers by the indigenous microbial community.
Figure 5. The ratio of consumed ammonium and nitrite nitrogen (N-NO2/N-NH4) (A) and ammonium and nitrite uptake rates (B) on mineral carriers by the indigenous microbial community.
Biology 11 01421 g005
Figure 6. Biofilm area on carriers after bioaugmentation with a “warm” anammox community, % according to confocal microscopy (A) and rates of ammonium and nitrite consumption (B).
Figure 6. Biofilm area on carriers after bioaugmentation with a “warm” anammox community, % according to confocal microscopy (A) and rates of ammonium and nitrite consumption (B).
Biology 11 01421 g006
Figure 7. Correlation of N-NO2/N-NH4 index, nitrogen consumption, and biofilm growth (Bf area) with the elemental composition of mineral carriers, p ≤ 0.5. A—bioaugmented microbial community, B—indigenous microbial community.
Figure 7. Correlation of N-NO2/N-NH4 index, nitrogen consumption, and biofilm growth (Bf area) with the elemental composition of mineral carriers, p ≤ 0.5. A—bioaugmented microbial community, B—indigenous microbial community.
Biology 11 01421 g007
Table 1. Chemical composition of the polluted groundwater.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the polluted groundwater.
ParameterUnitsValue
NH4mg/L58.4
NO2mg/L28.18
NO3mg/L7434
HCO3mg/L244
Kmg/L447.6
Namg/L879.7
Mgmg/L37.6
Camg/L1310
Clmg/L1213
SO4mg/L1803
Fetotmg/L2.1
Mnmg/L15.7
PO4 mg/L1.1
Uµg/L256
Corgmg/L2.5
pH-7.1
EhmV119
T°C7.5
Table 2. Mineral carriers used in this study.
Table 2. Mineral carriers used in this study.
AbbreviationThe Nature of the Carrier Sampling Site
QQuartzKola Peninsula
VExpanded vermiculiteProvided by PLC “Primver”
Z1Zeolite (clinoptillolite)Kholinskoye deposit, Khiloksky district, Trans-Baikal Territory
Z2Zeolite-containing tripoli Hotynetskoye deposit, Oryol region
ECExpanded clay CJSC “Keramzit” Moscow Region, Serpukhov district
IL IlliteUlyanovsk region
KC1 Kaolin clayKantatskiy deposit, Krasnoyarsk Territory
KC2Kaolin clayKamalinskoye deposit, Abakan, Republic of Khakassia
KC3Kaolin clayKompanovskoye deposit, Krasnoyarsk Territory
BC1Bentonite clayDinozavrovoye deposit, Republic of Kazakhstan
BC2 Bentonite clayZyryanskoe deposit, Kurgan region
BC3 Bentonite clayBerezovskoye deposit, Republic of Tatarstan
BC4 Bentonite clay10 Hutor deposit, Republic of Khakassia
S River sand Chernogolovka (Moscow region)
B2 rockRock of the upper (11 m) water-bearing horizonJSC “Siberian Chemical Plant”
Tomsk region, ZATO Seversk
CHMZ rockRock of the water-bearing horizonJSC “Chepetsky Mechanical Plant”
Glazov, Republic of Udmurtia
Table 3. Elemental composition of the mineral carriers, % mass.
Table 3. Elemental composition of the mineral carriers, % mass.
AbbreviationNa2OMgOAl2O3SiO2K2OCaOTiO2MnOFe2O3P2O5Stot.
Q0001000000000
IL0.231.5712.2268.12.730.550.80.024.420.050.11
KC10.681.1119.7162.01.31.811.010.044.540.08<0.02
KC0.30.5321.961.82.720.30.570.042.060.06<0.02
KC30.10.9819.4563.21.570.680.960.022.290.05<0.02
BC11.073.3315.5853.00.061.450.530.244.630.020.05
BC20.571.7316.2249.70.943.930.80.075.940.040.08
BC30.362.4618.5455.82.341.270.890.057.770.140.33
BC40.912.7316.9456.20.852.050.690.033.360.120.04
S0.460.172.5594.90.60.220.080.0030.440.03<0.02
V0.5619.810.540.34.51.010.480.24512.50.220.28
Z11.90.3812.367.241.60.110.8210.02<0.02
Z20.11.48.570.11.42.10.540.144.30.22<0.02
EC0.862.218.860.13.83.410.1528.20.290.1
B2 rock1.960.7210.2381.12.091.550.520.0442.250.07<0.02
CHMZ rock1.160.734.7385.20.732.830.170.0381.760.04<0.02
Table 4. Heat map of N-NO2/N-NH4 ratio and changes in biofouling and NH4 consumption rate after bioaugmentation with a “warm” anammox community.
Table 4. Heat map of N-NO2/N-NH4 ratio and changes in biofouling and NH4 consumption rate after bioaugmentation with a “warm” anammox community.
Carrier MaterialS *NH4 *N-NO2/N-NH4 *
Q1.50.84.7
IL11.53.4
KC12.10.91.5
KC21.22.812.5
KC31.11.62.1
BC11.21.40.8
BC21.60.90.2
BC31.31.31.3
BC41.21.30.4
CHMZ rock1.10.21.2
S4.71.18.4
B2 rock0.77.71.3
V0.71.20.1
Z11.110.6
Z21.11.10.6
EC0.92.40.4
Note: *—The N-NO2/N-NH4 column in green shows N-NO2/N-NH4 values of 1 ± 0.5, which corresponds to the high contribution of the anammox process to nitrogen removal. In the rest of the columns, green means a significant improvement, yellow a slight improvement, and red a worsening.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vishnyakova, A.; Popova, N.; Artemiev, G.; Botchkova, E.; Litti, Y.; Safonov, A. Effect of Mineral Carriers on Biofilm Formation and Nitrogen Removal Activity by an Indigenous Anammox Community from Cold Groundwater Ecosystem Alone and Bioaugmented with Biomass from a “Warm” Anammox Reactor. Biology 2022, 11, 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101421

AMA Style

Vishnyakova A, Popova N, Artemiev G, Botchkova E, Litti Y, Safonov A. Effect of Mineral Carriers on Biofilm Formation and Nitrogen Removal Activity by an Indigenous Anammox Community from Cold Groundwater Ecosystem Alone and Bioaugmented with Biomass from a “Warm” Anammox Reactor. Biology. 2022; 11(10):1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vishnyakova, Anastasia, Nadezhda Popova, Grigoriy Artemiev, Ekaterina Botchkova, Yuriy Litti, and Alexey Safonov. 2022. "Effect of Mineral Carriers on Biofilm Formation and Nitrogen Removal Activity by an Indigenous Anammox Community from Cold Groundwater Ecosystem Alone and Bioaugmented with Biomass from a “Warm” Anammox Reactor" Biology 11, no. 10: 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101421

APA Style

Vishnyakova, A., Popova, N., Artemiev, G., Botchkova, E., Litti, Y., & Safonov, A. (2022). Effect of Mineral Carriers on Biofilm Formation and Nitrogen Removal Activity by an Indigenous Anammox Community from Cold Groundwater Ecosystem Alone and Bioaugmented with Biomass from a “Warm” Anammox Reactor. Biology, 11(10), 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop