Next Article in Journal
Identifying Hidden Viable Bacterial Taxa in Tropical Forest Soils Using Amplicon Sequencing of Enrichment Cultures
Previous Article in Journal
Prognostic Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations on Long-Term Survival Outcomes in Egyptian Female Breast Cancer Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/biology10070568
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Collembola (Hexapoda) as Biological Drivers between Land and Sea

by
Izabella Olejniczak
1,*,
Maria Sterzyńska
2,
Paweł Boniecki
1,
Anita Kaliszewicz
1 and
Ninel Panteleeva
3
1
Institute of Biological Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
2
Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland
3
Murmansk Marine Biological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 17 Vladimirskaya Str., 183010 Murmansk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2021, 10(7), 568; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070568
Submission received: 14 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 22 June 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Collembola also represent one of the most abundant and important taxa of soil invertebrates inhabiting tundra soils. We focused on the structure and distribution patterns of the collembolan communities along the environmental gradient from costal tundra to live macroalgae and aged macroalgae debris deposited across the sub-Arctic coastline. Our results imply that environmental filtering influences collembolan species distributions across the gradient studied and the sorting of species according to their respective functional traits, including dispersal ability. We also suggest that the competition—colonisation trade-off mechanism, which affected the relative importance of competition and environmental filtering, probably determined Collembola community composition over the examined gradient. We believe that our results may become the basis for further study explaining the importance of Collembola as biological drivers of connectivity between land and sea.

Abstract

Macroalgae debris accumulated onshore function as points of interaction between marine and terrestrial ecological systems, but knowledge of the importance of detritivores facilitating the introduction of organic matter via the detritus pathway into neighbouring ecosystems, is still poorly understood. In particular, not much is known about biodiversity patterns and the colonisation of macroalgal debris by terrestrial, detritivorous soil microarthropods in the harsh environmental conditions in the subpolar Arctic region. We hypothesised that (i) soil microarthropods of the coastal tundra, including Collembola, can cross the ecosystem boundary and colonise decaying and freshly exposed macroalgae; and (ii) various inundation regimes by sea water, microhabitat stability and decaying of macroalgae drive distribution patterns of collembolan species. Our results suggest that environmental filtering influences collembolan species’ distributions across the examined gradient and induces sorting of species according to their functional traits, including dispersal ability, resistance to disturbance and environmental tolerance.

1. Introduction

Ecological connectivity is regulated by ecosystem boundaries, which function as semi-permeable points of interaction between distinct ecosystems [1]. According to Cadenasso [2], ecosystem boundaries, defined as zones of transition between contrasting systems, can function as ecological filters for habitats, materials or organisms. However, the role of ecosystem boundaries formed along environmental gradients [3] depends on the nature of the neighbouring areas or systems that allow only some fraction of materials, energy or organisms to pass [4]. In our study we treat connectivity between land and sea (land-sea interface) as the introduction of organic matter into the coastal system through soil microarthropods that top-down control the activity of microorganisms in decaying macroalgae.
Coastal transitional zones that occur at the interface of land and sea [5] provide regulation of the fluxes of nutrients, water, particles and organisms to and from the land and the ocean [6] and support a critical habitat for a wide range of both marine and terrestrial biodiversity [7]. Several studies highlight the importance of ecological connectivity and resource transfer from marine to terrestrial ecosystems across ecosystem boundaries for maintaining productivity and diversity at landscape scale [8], including either the distributions of wrack cover in the coastal recipient ecosystem [9], the flow of microbially mediated organic material or both [10].
On the coasts of the polar regions, accumulated onshore macroalgae debris, mainly derived from kelp forests [11], is a material that crosses habitat boundaries and subsidises coastal ecosystems, including residential populations. This material functions as a semi-permeable point of interaction between marine and terrestrial ecological systems and has an important effect on the diversity and distribution pattern of biota [10,12,13], including a considerable bottom-up effect on detritivorous communities [14,15]. Nonetheless, the knowledge of the interconnection and interdependence of marine, coastal and terrestrial ecosystems, including the importance of detritivore communities facilitating the introduction of organic matter into neighbouring ecosystems, remains unclear. In particular, little is known about how deposited onshore macroalgal detritus, which represent cross-boundary subsidies, are either permeable to soil microarthropods, impact their distribution pattern and diversity or both.
Soil microarthropods, by initiating the process of detrital decomposition (shredding, consuming and transforming), accelerate microbial decomposition and nutrient cycling and mediate substantial fluxes between the aboveground and belowground components of terrestrial ecosystems [16]. The decomposition process is particularly important in the Arctic region, where invertebrate communities create relatively simple trophic nets sensitive to any disturbances [17,18]. Among soil microarthropods of the Arctic region, Collembola are the relevant part of the decomposing food web involved in the recycling of organic matter and nutrients in soil [19]. Belowground food web models usually place Collembola as feeding generalists [20]; however, fungi, bacteria and algae may prevail in their diet [19,21]. This triggers top-down control of the decomposer community (i.e., bacteria and fungi) and indirectly may affect soil processes such as organic matter decomposition [19,21] and contribute to soil structure and humus formation [22]. Collembola are also useful models for ecological studies, as their abundance and distribution pattern of species are strongly dependent on individual tolerance limits to environmental conditions [23,24].
Several collembolan species are known to live in either marine wrack material, salt marshes, littoral zones, or a combination [25,26,27]. These terrestrial colonisers of intertidal habitats, resistant to stress and exposed to pronounced environmental fluctuations, are often found in the intertidal environment in very large numbers [28]. Although collembolan species are terrestrial, some of them have adapted to marine habitats where environmental parameters are constantly changing [29]. Collembola also represent one of the most abundant and important taxa of soil invertebrates inhabiting tundra soils [18,30]. Their adaptations to the harsh climatic conditions of polar and subpolar areas [31,32] allow them to survive low winter temperatures [33] and avoid the negative impact of sub-Arctic climate changes induced by drought through either migrating to wetter sites both vertically, horizontally or both [34], through limiting evaporative water loss due to their impermeable cuticles or in combination [35,36]. However, not much is known about either the distribution pattern and permeability, colonisation of the tundra soil microarthropods, including Collembola, to deposited onshore macroalgae debris in such harsh climatic conditions of polar and sub-polar areas, or both.
The current study focuses on the structure and distribution pattern of the collembolan communities along the environmental gradient from costal tundra to living macroalgae and decaying macroalgae debris deposited across the sub-Arctic coastline (Murman coast). There is well-documented coastal habitat connectivity for Collembola [37,38,39]; however, the colonisation patterns of macroalgae by collembolan species has been poorly investigated in subpolar and polar regions [30,40,41]. It should be emphasised that the importance of macroalgae for the diversity and distribution pattern of soil microarthropods, including Collembola, resulting from the interaction between terrestrial and marine ecosystems of the Barents Sea, is not yet known.
To address this knowledge gap, we investigated colonisation patterns of macroalgae by collembolan communities across environmental gradients from coastal tundra to macroalgae (aged macroalgae debris accumulated onshore and living macroalgae freshly exposed by the outflow). We hypothesised that (i) soil microarthropods of the coastal tundra zone, including terrestrial Collembola, can cross the ecosystem boundary and colonise marine macroalgae; and (ii) various inundation regimes by sea water, microhabitat stability and decaying of macroalgae drive distribution patterns of collembolan species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sampling Processing

The study was conducted on the shoreline of the Murman coast (northwest Russia) of the Barents Sea near the Dalnye Zelentsy settlement (69°7′ N, 36°3′ E) located on the Kola Peninsula (Figure 1). The Barents Sea is a sub-Arctic ecosystem located between 70 and 80° N, connected with the Norwegian Sea to the west and the Arctic Ocean to the north. The salinity of the offshore waters washed onto the Murman coast is about 34% [42] A wide development of the polar front phenomenon and vertical water circulation are the basis of high biological productivity in the sea and high richness of its pelagic and bottom life required for dense growth of kelp forests [43]. They are deposited on the coastal line as spatial subsidies (macroalgae debris) [44].
The northwest Murman coast is characterised by the presence of rocky areas and fjords and is covered with vegetation characteristic of the sub-Arctic tundra [45]. The climate of the Murman coast is rather mild because of the Gulf Stream and is characterised by a humid, cool summer and a relatively mild winter, so the frost-free season lasts about 120 days [45]. The warmest month is July, and the average temperature ranges from 9 to 11 °C; the coldest month is February, which is characterised by an average temperature of about −10 °C [45]. The annual precipitation ranges from 300 to 400 mm [45]. The territory is affected by strong winds and drastically changeable weather [30]. The average temperature, precipitation and wind force in July 2010 and 2013 are given in Table 1.
The study was carried out in the bays located along the Murmansk coast (Figure 1). Dalne-Zelenetskaya Bay (B1) is characterised by a relatively mild onshore slope, with a coastal tundra overgrown mainly with black crowberries, mosses, lichens and grasses, dwarf birch and willows. Plohye Chevry (B2) is stony, with fragments of coastal tundra that function as sea meadows with numerous grasses, sedges and perennials resistant to salinity that have penetrated into the tidal zone and are separated from the tidal zone by a steep fjord. Medvezhya Bay and Parchniha Bay (B3 and B4, respectively) are characterised by a gentle onshore slope, with a coastal tundra covered by mosses, grasses and sedges, respectively, and tundra vegetation at higher elevations not inundated by tidal water that consists of lichens, black crowberries and dwarf birch. Yarnyshnaya Bay, unlike all the previous bays, cuts deeply into the land. The study sites were located on the east and west coasts of the bay, due to the differences in the onshore slope and the vegetation overgrowing them. The eastern side of the bay, with a gentle slope, is covered mainly with a thick layer of black crowberries, lichens, mosses and dwarf birches (B5), while the western side is covered mainly with lichens and mosses with the addition of dwarf birch, often visited by sea birds (B6). Within each bay, sampling was performed across environmental gradients from coastal tundra to decaying macroalgae debris not inundated by tidal water to living macroalgae freshly exposed by outflow.
Sampling was carried out in July of 2010 and 2013 (after the spring tide). On each occasion, the samples were collected from the non-inundated sea water coastal tundra zone (T), then, in the old algae (OA), macroalgae debris zone which had been deposited on the shore at least three weeks earlier, and finally in the fresh algae (FA), which is freshly exposed by outflow (one hour before sampling), living macroalgae zone which had been regularly inundated (twice a day) by sea water. In a given site (B1–B6), 10 samples were taken in each of the study zones (total of 30 samples in each site). The samples were taken every 2 m to a depth of 5 cm using a 10 cm side frame. The depth of the samples was connected to the thickness of the macroalgae, which was about 5 cm. Because study sites involved inundated, living macroalgae, the standard frame method with defined surface area was used, which was suitable for all environments. Collembola from the samples were extracted in Tullgren’s apparatus.
The identification of specimens was based on recent comprehensive manuals [25,26,46,47,48,49,50]. All specimens were deposited at the Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Institute of Biological Sciences (Warsaw, Poland).

2.2. Macroalgal Nutrients

Macro- and micronutrient (phosphorous, P; potassium, K; calcium, Ca; magnesium, Mg; manganese, Mn; iron, Fe) content in the living macroalgae freshly exposed by outflow and decaying macroalgae debris was used as a proxy of fertiliser regime (properties) and nutrient supply for microbial growth and bacterial biofilm formation. This content in macroalgal detritus was quantified in 400 mg of algal material digested in 7 mL of concentrated nitric acid and then in an MLS Turbowave microwave liquid digestion system (Anton-Paar Multiwave 3000 microwave unit; Anton-Paar, Graz, Austria), where deionised H2O was added to the capacity of 100 cm3 and analysed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) with an ICPE-9820 simultaneous ICP atomic emission spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

2.3. Data Analysis

We used Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA to assess differences in collembolan density, richness and diversity as well as the composition of ecological traits between coastal tundra and decaying and fresh macroalgal detritus patches. The significance of differences was determined with a multiple comparison post hoc test of mean ranks (Dunn’s test) applied after the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA. The offshore/onshore habitat matrix permeability to Collembola at the sub-Arctic seashore was evaluated by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). NMDS is a data reduction technique that projects multivariate data along latent axes in a distance measure-based space and preserves the underlying dissimilarity structure between points [51]. The NMDS distance matrix was calculated using the square-root transformed Bray–Curtis distance between cases (samples) [52]. Principal component rotation was employed to maximise the variation of the scores resulting from the NMDS. The NMDS solution was projected in K = 2 dimensions, Kruskal stress algorithm type 2, which uses the sum of squares of the starting differences [52]. To evaluate the goodness of fit for the final NMDS model, we considered stress values of <0.05 as showing an excellent representation of the data: <0.1 good representation, <0.2 acceptable representation and >0.3 unsatisfactory representation [53].
The effect of the land-sea interface on springtail community variation and the distribution pattern was assessed by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). CCA was employed because, in our case, the value of the gradient calculated for the first axis of detrended correspondence analusis (DCA) was 3.45 SD [54]. The CCA analysis was constrained by factors such as location of site within the bays (B), habitat (H) related to FA, OA and T, and time (T) related to year of study. A partial canonical correspondence analysis (pCCA) was performed to reflect the relative importance of study factors as a group of predictors of Collembola community variation. According to the factors examined, we excluded the possible effect of site (B) in partitioning of the response effect to habitat patch (H) and time (T). The Monte Carlo permutation test was used to quantify the significance of the CCA and pCCA models. In our study, B was the unit of replication (N = 6); therefore, for the significance level of the effect of the habitat patch and time, we specified a permutation within blocks defined by the covariate B. Raw and adjusted variation using the number of degrees of freedom was estimated in the CCA and pCCA analyses. A generalised linear model (GLM) was performed to analyse the species-specific distribution of Collembola along the environmental (habitat) gradient examined. A regression model was fitted with a second-order polynomial of the predictor variable and quasi−Poisson distribution for the response data and F-test-based selection. The predictor variable was the first DCA axis fitted with the habitat scores. Species’ response curves were fitted for species that occurred at least in the coastal tundra and macroalgal patches. Among species that met this criterion were Hypogastrura viatica, Tetracanthella arctica, Folsomia quadrioculata, Entomobrya nivalis, Friesea mirabilis, Agrenia bidenticulata, Pseudisotoma sensibilis and Isotoma anglicana.
Analyses were performed using a data matrix with mean abundance data in which the value in each cell was the mean abundance of species retrieved from 10 soil cores at each plot on each sampling occasion. In the multivariate analysis, time was treated as repeated measures for adjusting p-value data. Before calculation, all data were standardised to m2 basis, and abundance data for each species were log(x10 + 1) transformed prior to ordination. The level of significance in all analyses was at α = 0.05. Calculations were made with Statistica 10.0 and Canoco 5.0 software packages.

2.4. Functional Trait-Based Analysis

The dispersal ability and life form groupings according to morphology-based Gisin’s system [55], modified by Stebajeva [56], were used to evaluate the Collembola community penetration between vegetated low-arctic coastal ecosystems and macroalgal patches across the shoreline of the Barents Sea.
The trait-based structure of Collembola communities was analysed on the basis of the sum of density (m2) of species attributed to each trait in each of 10 cores. In this study, we divided Collembola species into epigeic (including species occurring on the ground, vegetation or on the water surface), hemiedaphic and euedaphic life form traits considered as dwellers of litter surface, litter depth and topsoil, respectively, and according to their dispersal ability (fast dispersion, slow dispersion) [57]. The assignment of Collembola species determined during the study to individual life form traits was mainly based on the analysis of various literature resources, including a number of specified synopses and identification keys [25,26,46,47,48,50].

3. Results

3.1. Macroalgal Fertility Regime

Significant differences in macro- and micronutrient content were found between the FA and OA with respect to K, Ca and Mg (Table 2). OA without wave oscillations (disturbances) had a higher Ca content and a lower Mg and K content.

3.2. Changes in Communities of Collembola

A total of 2152 Collembola representing 18 species were identified across all bays on the Murman coast shoreline of the Barents Sea (Table 3). Amongst them, only Hypogastrura viatica and Isotoma anglicana were recorded in the FA, and Protaphorura bicampata were recorded exclusively in OA. Significant variation in density (D), species richness (S) and value of Shannon’s diversity index (H’) of collembolan communities was found amongst coastal tundra and FA and OA (Kruskal–Wallis one way ANOVA:H (2, N = 30), p < 0.05 in all cases) (Table 3). The multiple comparison post hoc test of mean ranks (Dunn’s test, p < 0.05) showed a significantly lower richness, diversity and density of collembolan communities in the living macroalgae exposed by outflow (FA) in comparison to aged macroalgae debris (OA) and coastal tundra (T). Collembolan density had significantly higher mean values in the OA (Table 3).
A significant effect of environmental change across the coastal tundra (T) and old algae (OA) and fresh algae (FA) was found for ecological traits grouped according to life forms, such as mean density of epigeic, hemiedaphic and euedaphic species, and mean density of species with fast and slow dispersal ability (Kruskal–Wallis one way ANOVA:H (2, N = 30), p < 0.05 in all cases; Table 4). Epigeic and fast-dispersing collembolan species were only able to colonise FA. The mean density of epigeic and fast dispersing species was significantly higher within OA compared to coastal tundra (T) and FA (Dunn’s test, p < 0.05). The mean density of hemiedaphic and euedaphic species with slow dispersal ability was significantly lower in OA compared to coastal tundra (T) (Dunn’s test, p < 0.05).
The NMDS results showed dissimilarity between the collembolan communities of coastal tundra and intertidal zones, but revealed proximity between FA and OA within the intertidal zone along the principal component analysis (PCA) rotated axis 1 (Figure 2). The first two axes of NMDS accounted for 92.9% of the total variation in collembolan communities (adjusted explained variation—82.9%, Kruskal stress value = 0.13).
The total CCA model demonstrated that the factors examined accounted for more than 50.4% of the variance in collembolan community composition (Table 5).
The pure environmental effect of location (B) and habitat (H) was significant (Monte Carlo permutation test p = 0.002) and explained 30.7% (adj. 14.2%) and 30.0% (adj. 24.3%) of the variation, respectively, while variation uniquely attributable to time (Tm), although significant, explained less variation in collembolan communities (10.1%) (adj. 5.8%). The results of pCCA revealed a significant species–environment relationship across the environmental gradient. For instance, Protaphorura bicampata and Agrenia bidenticulata were associated with OA, while Isotoma anglicana and Hypogastrura viatica showed a positive correlation with FA (Figure 3).
The species response curves fitted with a GLM also indicated differences in species distribution across the examined seashore habitats (Figure 4).
In our case, the total amount of variation was associated with the distribution pattern of Folsomia quadrioculata and Pseudisotoma sensibilis (79.6% and 85.2%, respectively) fitted with the second-order polynomial predictor. The optimum positions of these two species on the first DCA axis were correlated with coastal tundra along the seashore gradient (habitat gradient) (Figure 4, Table 6). For species such as Hypogastrura viatica, Tetracanthella arctica, Entomobrya nivalis and Friesea mirabilis, a linear predictor fitted the species data better, with the lowest explained variation for Hypogastrura viatica (18.3%). The pattern in the response curve of Hypogastrura viatica was positively correlated with macroalgal habitats (Figure 4, Table 6). No significant responses were shown for Agrenia bidenticulata and Isotoma anglicana.

4. Discussion

4.1. Community Structure and Diversity

One of the main goals of our study was to assess whether soil microarthropods, including Collembola representing detritivores, can cross the ecosystem boundary and colonise macroalgae in the subpolar region. To achieve that goal, we examined the distribution pattern of Collembola from the coastal tundra to the macroalgae of the intertidal zone. As expected, our results revealed that macroalgae function as a microhabitat for soil microarthropods. We also clearly demonstrated that terrestrial Collembola can cross the ecosystem boundary between coastal tundra and macroalgae. The apparent differences in community composition and values of richness, diversity and abundance of Collembola across the gradient investigated in our study positively verified our hypothesis that not only the decaying of macroalgae debris but also the stability of microhabitat affect the colonisation pattern.
We noted that inundated by tidal water, FA were colonised only by two epigeic and fast-moving collembolan species: Hypogastrura viatica and Isotoma anglicana. Both species are considered superhydrophobic [58]. Hypogastrura viatica is a cosmopolitan species preferring moist habitats [50], and it is resistant to salinity, adapted to regular flooding [27,29,41] and frequently found along the seacoast [26,29], while Isotoma anglicana prefers wet habitats and is commonly found in polar and subpolar areas [25]. The OA, in total, were colonised by a much higher number of epigeic and fast-moving species of Collembola (nine species). Further CCA results revealed that the taxa highly (exclusively) associated with OA were Protaphorura bicampata, a species characteristic of wet habitats, such as sea meadows and wrack deposits [25], and Agrenia bidenticulata, a species common in damp Arctic tundra, mostly littoral [29] and tolerant to short-term flooding by sea waters [26]. Surprising was the absence of Archisotoma megalops, a littoral, fast moving species [30] in macroalgae, especially that was present in the tundra. The absence of this species in the macroalgae patches could be related to either the involved abundance based, not activity-based method or it could be related to its lower density and higher activity in the investigated habitats, or in combination.
Our results also reported a significantly enhanced abundance of collembolan communities in non-inundated OA in comparison with inundated, freshly exposed by outflow FA and coastal tundra sites. These findings suggest that the steep gradient between the terrestrial and marine interface, which induces changes in environmental conditions and environmental stability in the face of disturbances, functions as a filter shaping the communities. Environmental filtering, in the context of species abundance changes in collembolan communities across an environmental gradient, can be explained by habitat preferences and dispersal ability processes [59]. The revealed low permeability of the FA can be related to their extraordinary dynamics associated with inundation by tidal waters. Sea water induces, amongst other things, either osmotic and oxygen stress, changes in salinity, which can limit colonisation/immigration processes and permeability of this harsh and highly dynamic marine macroalgal microbiome to terrestrial Collembola, or in combination [10].
Furthermore, either the small-scale colonisation pattern, penetration of marine subsidies sensu Polis [44] by Collembola across the land-ocean interface in the coastal zone of the subpolar region or both, can also be impacted by biotic interactions, including food requirements and competition for food resources.
Our study highlighted significant differences in sources of nutrients between FA and OA related to the fertiliser regime and microbial concentration. Collembola are generally considered detritivores [36], but their diet also includes fungi and bacteria [19]. The pathway of macroalgal detritus degradation, which can take several weeks [60], facilitates the growth of microorganisms [8] and, in consequence, induces changes in the food resources and food availability for soil microarthropods, including Collembola [41]. Microbial decomposition of macroalgal detritus leads to the release of nutrients and induces changes in trophic interactions that might influence soil biodiversity [61]. Limitations in the availability of food resources as a factor determining the species richness of springtails have been presented in studies of springtail communities in salt marshes [28] and caves [62]. The increase in Collembola abundance in aged macroalgal patches compared with coastal tundra soils, as demonstrated in our study, can also be related to competition for resources and predation. Competition for shared resources and predation are usually amongst the most important factors driving prey community dynamics [63]. Unfortunately, it was impossible to examine resource concentration in the coastal tundra soils and temporal variability in resource availability caused by resource pulses. Therefore, top−down control of collembolan abundance by predation and their competition for resources as a function of resource concentration changes across the gradient investigated were not identified. However, strong competition for resources and extensive niche overlap amongst the dominant arthropod predators in the tundra have been documented [64], while macroalgae, although a rich source of nutrients, unlike the tundra, do not provide many microhabitats and possibilities for a variety of resource use and are characterised by strong competition for resources [29,40].

4.2. Functional Traits

Our study also indicated that the community traits of life forms and dispersal ability responded to the steep gradient between terrestrial and marine subsidies. We found higher proportions of collembolan species adapted to the surface way of life (epigeic life forms) and greater dispersal ability in macroalgae in comparison with coastal tundra sites. We also noted that the decaying macroalgal patches, unlike the fresh patches, promoted coexistence of a higher number of Collembola species adapted to the surface way of life and demonstrated greater colonising ability. This result suggests that competition—colonisation trade-off mechanism—can probably determine community composition over the examined gradient [65]. The apparent differences in total abundance of epigeic and fast dispersed species between FA and OA, being an intermediate stage of the gradient between coastal tundra and FA, suggest that disturbance intensity can shape the species trait patterning. This finding confirms community functional responses to disturbances [66] and the relationship between ecological preferences or tolerances of the collembolan species and species trait patterning [59,67].

4.3. Ecological Species Filtering

The NMDS results, however, showed weak penetration of terrestrial springtails into the marine subsidy (Figure 2). It is known that ecological constraints and spatial distance between patches can influence the assembly and composition of communities [68]. The results of our NMDS model suggest that, in such a highly dynamic and unstable tidal system, it is the ecological constraints rather than spatial distance between patches that probably play a pivotal role in the assembly of collembolan communities. The distances between patches across the study transects were small (about 1 m) and probably did not limit migration of the Collembola. According to some studies, the dispersal pathway of Collembola could be active [69,70,71], e.g., by flooding water or strong wind that dominate in the Arctic coast that we studied. Therefore, the finding of high dissimilarity amongst collembolan communities in our study indicated that ecological constraints, such as either biotic interactions (competition) [72,73], abiotic conditions (e.g., either salinity, nutrient contents or both), habitat instability or in combination, had a key effect on their dispersal patterning.
Nonetheless, it is important to note that local differences between the bays related to coastline topography, habitat patch and seasonal variability were significant drivers of variability in collembolan community composition. Variance partitioning in CCA models showed that location (B) and habitat patch (H) had the greatest unique effect on the variation of collembolan community and explained similar proportions of their variation, while time, although significant, explained less variation (Table 5). This finding points to the role of environmental conditions acting as filters for local species sorting [74]. Soil microarthropod communities can be sorted by environmental filtering [59,68], including species tolerance to inundation and salinity [75].
Further GLM models (Figure 4) confirm that environmental filtering selects species with particular traits. The results of our study showed the disappearance of species connected to the Arctic tundra, such as Tetracanthella arctica [30,48], along the seashore gradient (Figure 4) and increased abundance of surface water-dwelling species resistant to salinity, such as Hypogastrura viatica, in macroalgal patches. This finding confirms Widenfalk and others’ concept that the degree of environmental filtering by local communities is dependent on the degree of environmental disturbance [73]. Our results show that, although most of the terrestrial species we found in coastal tundra were characterised by a wide range of distribution, only those resistant to flooding, dryness or salinity were able to penetrate from the coastal tundra to macroalgal beds of the intertidal zone. The observed disappearance of species associated with the Arctic tundra, such as Tetracanthella arctica [30,48], along the seashore gradient (Figure 4) can be related to habitat preferences and disturbance tolerance. Species with a wide tolerance range of environmental conditions are able to colonise variable environments [27,71], while those revealing a lack of tolerance to new environmental conditions disappear [71]. The replacement of Hypogastrura viatica by Folsomia quadrioculata in decaying macroalgae (Figure 4) in our study indicates that, besides habitat condition changes (dryness and salinity) that can control the distribution pattern of collembolan species, the competition for food could be a predominant factor. According to some studies, macroalgal patches are decomposed mainly by bacteria [76], which are sources of food for Collembola, including Folsomia quadrioculata and Hypogastrura viatica [41]. The importance of competition (competitive exclusion) on the collembolan community composition, documented in many studies [72,73], was a predominant factor in the OA of the Kola Bay [40].

5. Conclusions

As expected, Collembola can cross the boundary between coastal tundra and macroalgae on the seashore. Nonetheless, it is important to indicate that OA were more permeable to coastal tundra springtails than freshly exposed by outflow FA. These results imply that environmental filtering influences collembolan species distributions across the gradient studied and the sorting of species according to their respective functional traits, including dispersal ability. Our findings also suggest that the competition—colonisation trade-off mechanism, which affected the relative importance of competition and environmental filtering—probably determined Collembola community composition over the examined gradient (dynamics of environmental changes).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.O. and M.S.; methodology, I.O.; software, M.S.; validation, I.O.; formal analysis, I.O. and M.S.; investigation, I.O., P.B., A.K. and N.P.; resources, I.O.; data curation, I.O.; writing—original draft preparation, I.O. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, I.O. and M.S.; visualization, I.O.; supervision, I.O.; project administration, I.O.; funding acquisition, N.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the Polish Academy of Sciences and the Murmansk Marine Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Murmansk Marine Biological Institute KSC RAS (Kola Scientific Centre of Russian Academy of Science) for help in all activities that realizing this project. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for linguistic proofreading of the presented text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

FAfresh algae
OAold algae
Tcoastal tundra
Bsite within the bays
Hhabitat
Tmtime
EPepigeic life form
Hehemiedaphic life form
Eueuedaphic life form
pCCApartial canonical correspondence analysis
CCAcanonical correspondence analysis
DCADetrended correspondence analysis
PCAprincipal component analysis
GLMgeneralised linear model
NMDSNon-metric multidimensional scaling
Ddensity of collembolan communities (103 ind·m−2)
Sspecies richness of collembolan communities
H’Shannon’s diversity of collembolan communities
HvHypogastrura viatica (Tullberg, 1872)
FmFriesea mirabilis (Tullberg, 1871)
TaTetracanthella arctica Cassagna, 1959
FqFolsomia quadrioculata (Tullberg, 1871)
PsPseudisotoma sensibilis (Tullberg, 1876)
EntmEntomobrya nivalis (Linnaeus, 1758)

References

  1. Puth, L.M.; Wilson, K.A. Boundaries and Corridors as a Continuum of Ecological Flow Control: Lessons from Rivers and Streams. Conserv. Biol. 2001, 15, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cadenasso, M.L.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Weathers, K.C.; Jones, C. A Framework for a Theory of Ecological Boundaries. BioScience 2003, 53, 750–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kolasa, J. Ecological boundaries: A derivative of ecological entities. Web Ecol. 2014, 14, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Strayer, D.; Power, M.E.; Fagan, W.F.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Belnap, J. A Classification of Ecological Boundaries. BioScience 2003, 53, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Crossland, C.J.; Baird, D.; Ducrotoy, J.P.; Lindeboom, H.; Buddemeier, R.W.; Dennison, W.C.; Maxwell, B.A.; Smith, S.V.; Swaney, D.P. The coastal zone—A domain of global interactions. In Coastal Fluxes in the Anthropocene; Crossland, C.J., Kremer, H.H., Lindeboom, H., Marshall Crossland, J.I., Le Tissier, M.D.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  6. Levin, L.A.; Boesch, D.F.; Covich, A.; Dahm, C.; Erséus, C.; Ewel, K.C.; Kneib, R.T.; Moldenke, A.; Palmer, M.A.; Snelgrove, P.; et al. The Function of Marine Critical Transition Zones and the Importance of Sediment Biodiversity. Ecosystems 2001, 4, 430–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rog, S.M.; Cook, C.N. Strengthening governance for intertidal ecosystems requires a consistent definition of boundaries between land and sea. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 197, 694–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Braeckman, U.; Pasotti, F.; Vázquez, S.; Zacher, K.; Hoffmann, R.; Elvert, M.; Marchant, H.; Buckner, C.; Quartino, M.L.; MacCormack, W.; et al. Degradation of macroalgal detritus in shallow coastal Antarctic sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2019, 64, 1423–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Liebowitz, D.M.; Nielsen, K.J.; Dugan, J.E.; Morgan, S.G.; Malone, D.P.; Largier, J.L.; Hubbard, D.M.; Carr, M.H. Ecosystem connectivity and trophic subsidies of sandy beaches. Ecosphere 2016, 7, e01503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Säwström, C.; Hyndes, G.A.; Eyre, B.D.; Huggett, M.J.; Fraser, M.; Lavery, P.S.; Thomson, P.G.; Tarquinio, F.; Steinberg, P.D.; Laverock, B. Coastal connectivity and spatial subsidy from a microbial perspective. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 6662–6671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krumhansl, K.; Scheibling, R. Production and fate of kelp detritus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012, 467, 281–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Colombini, I.; Chelazzi, L. Influence of marine allochthonous input on sandy beach communities. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 2003, 41, 115–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodil, I.F.; Lastra, M.; López, J.; Mucha, A.P.; Fernandes, J.P.; Fernandes, S.V.; Olabarria, C. Sandy Beaches as Biogeochemical Hotspots: The Metabolic Role of Macroalgal Wrack on Low-productive Shores. Ecosystems 2018, 22, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Spiller, D.A.; Piovia-Scott, J.; Wright, A.; Yang, L.; Takimoto, G.; Schoener, T.W.; Iwata, T. Marine subsidies have multiple effects on coastal food webs. Ecology 2010, 91, 1424–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Vieira, J.V.; Ruiz-Delgado, M.C.; Reyes-Martínez, M.J.; Borzone, C.A.; Asenjo, A.; Sánchez-Moyano, J.E.; Garcia-García, F.J. Assessment the short-term effects of wrack removal on supralittoral arthropods using the M-BACI design on Atlantic sandy beaches of Brazil and Spain. Mar. Environ. Res. 2016, 119, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, L.H. Interactions between a detrital resource pulse and a detritivore community. Oecologia 2005, 147, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bazely, D.R.; Jefferies, R.I. Trophic interactions in Arctic ecosystems and the occurrence of a terrestrial trophic cascade. In Ecology of Arctic Environments; Woodin, S.J., Marquiss, M., Eds.; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 1997; pp. 183–207. [Google Scholar]
  18. Coulson, S.; Convey, P.; Aakra, K.; Aarvik, L.; Ávila-Jiménez, M.; Babenko, A.; Biersma, E.M.; Boström, S.; Brittain, J.; Carlsson, A.; et al. The terrestrial and freshwater invertebrate biodiversity of the archipelagoes of the Barents Sea; Svalbard, Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 68, 440–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petersen, H. General aspects of collembolan ecology at the turn of the millennium. Pedobiologia 2002, 46, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ngosong, C.; Raupp, J.; Scheu, S.; Ruess, L. Low importance for a fungal based food web in arable soils under mineral and organic fertilization indicated by Collembola grazers. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 2308–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chauvat, M.; Perez, G.; Ponge, J.-F. Foraging patterns of soil springtails are impacted by food resources. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2014, 82, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Grandy, A.S.; Wieder, W.R.; Wickings, K.; Kyker-Snowman, E. Beyond microbes: Are fauna the next frontier in soil biogeochemical models? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 102, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Faber, J.H.; Verhoef, H.A. Functional differences between closely-related soil arthropods with respect to decomposition processes in the presence or absence of pine tree roots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1991, 23, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chikoski, J.M.; Ferguson, S.H.; Meyer, L. Effects of water addition on soil arthropods and soil characteristics in a precipitation-limited environment. Acta Oecol. 2006, 30, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fjellberg, A. The Collembola of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Part I: Poduromorpha. Fauna Entomol. Scand. 1998, 35, 1–183. [Google Scholar]
  26. Thibaud, J.M.; Schulc, H.J.; da Gama Assalino, M.M. Synopsis on Palearctic Collembola: Hypogastruridae. Abh. Ber. Nat. Gorlitz 2004, 75, 1–287. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ivask, M.; Kuu, A.; Meriste, M.; Kutti, S.; Palo, A.; Raamets, J.; Kilki, S. Springtails of flooded meadows along Matsalu Bay and the Kasari River, Estonia. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 66, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sterzyńska, M.; Ehrnsberger, R. The distribution and diversity of Collembola in saltmarsh habitats of the German North Sea—A preliminary study. Pedobiologia 2000, 44, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Witteveen, J.; Joosse, E.N.G. Growth, reproduction and mortality in marine littoral Collembola at different salinities. Ecol. Èntomol. 1987, 12, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Babenko, A.B. Springtails (Hexapoda, Collembola) of Tundra Landscapes of the Kola Peninsula. Èntomol. Rev. 2012, 92, 497–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Everatt, M.J.; Convey, P.; Bale, J.S.; Worland, M.R.; Hayward, S.A. Responses of invertebrates to temperature and water stress: A polar perspective. J. Therm. Biol. 2015, 54, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Holmstrup, M. Screening of cold tolerance in fifteen springtail species. J. Therm. Biol. 2018, 77, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Convey, P.; Abbandonato, H.; Bergan, F.; Beumer, L.T.; Biersma, E.M.; Bråthen, V.S.; D’Imperio, L.; Jensen, C.K.; Nilsen, S.; Paquin, K.; et al. Survival of rapidly fluctuating natural low winter temperatures by High Arctic soil invertebrates. J. Therm. Biol. 2015, 54, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Makkonen, M.; Berg, M.P.; van Hal, J.R.; Callaghan, T.V.; Press, M.C.; Aerts, R. Traits explain the responses of a sub-arctic Collembola community to climate manipulation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Holmstrup, M.; Bayley, M. Protaphorura tricampata, a euedaphic and highly permeable springtail that can sustain activity by osmoregulation during extreme drought. J. Insect Physiol. 2013, 59, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hopkin, S.P. Biology of the Springtails, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1997; p. 330. [Google Scholar]
  37. Greenslade, P.; van Klinken, R.D. Marine littoral and coastal Collembola on the subantarctic Macquarie Island. Acta Zool. Fenn. 1994, 195, 58–61. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kronberg, I. Structure and adaptation of the fauna in the black zone (littoral fringe) along rocky shores in northern Europe. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1988, 49, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jakšić, T.R.; Vasić, P.S.; Labus, N.Đ.; Papović, O.M.; Stanojević, M.R.; Đukić, N.N. The springtails (Insecta: Collembola) fauna at different microhabitats of Bečići beach, Montenegro. Univ. Thought Publ. Nat. Sci. 2018, 8, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Olejniczak, I.; Boniecki, P.; Kaliszewicz, A.; Panteleeva, N. Springtils (Collembola: Hexapoda) inhabiting algae with different degrees of waste product contamination. Studia Biol. Bioet. UKSW 2015, 13, 135–142. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sveum, P. The influence of grazing by Hypogastrura viatica (Insecta: Collembola) on microbial activity in decomposing kelp on Spitsbergen. Polar Res. 1987, 5, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schoschina, E.V. On Laminaria hyperborea (Laminariales, phaeophyceae) on the murman coast of the barents sea. Sarsia 1997, 82, 371–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mikhaylova, T. Laminaria hyperborean (Laminariaceae) on the Murman coast of Barents Sea. Bot. Zhurnal 2010, 95, 326–338. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  44. Polis, G.A.; Anderson, W.B.; Holt, R.D. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: The dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1997, 28, 289–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Koroleva, N.E. Phytosociological survey of the tundra vegetation of the Kola Peninsula, Russia. J. Veg. Sci. 1994, 5, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bretfeld, G. Synopses on Palearctic Collembola. Vol. 2: Symphypleona. Abh. Ber. Nat. Görlitz. Ger. 1999, 731, 1–318. [Google Scholar]
  47. Dunger, W.; Schlitt, B. Synopses on Palearctic Collembola, Part 1: Tullbergiidae. Soil Org. 2011, 83, 1–168. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fjellberg, A. The Collembola of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Part II: Entomobryomorpha and Symphypleona. Fauna Entomol. Scand. 2007, 42, 1–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jordana, R. Synopses on Palearctic Collembola, Partr 1: Capbryinae and Entomobryini. Soil Org. 2012, 7/1, 1–390. [Google Scholar]
  50. Potapov, M. Synopses on Palaearctic Collembola. Isotomidae. Abh. Ber. Nat. Görlitz 2001, 3, 1–600. [Google Scholar]
  51. McCune, B.; Grace, J.B.; Urban, D.L. Analysis of Ecological Communities; MJM Software Design: Glenedon Beach, OR, USA, 2002; p. 304. ISBN 9780972129008. [Google Scholar]
  52. Legandre, P.; Legandre, L. Numerical Ecology, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; p. 1006. ISBN 9780444538680. [Google Scholar]
  53. Clarke, K.R.; Warwick, R.M. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd ed.; PRIMER-E, Ltd., Plymouth Marine Laboratory: Plymouth, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  54. Leps, J.; Šmilauer, P. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003; p. 269. [Google Scholar]
  55. Gisin, H. Őkologie und Lebensgemeinschaften der Collembolen im Schweizerischen Exkursionsgebiet Basels. Rev. Suisse Zool. 1943, 50, 131–224. [Google Scholar]
  56. Stebaeva, S.K. Life forms in springtails (Collembola). Zool. Zhurnal 1970, 49, 1437–1454. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  57. Malmström, A. Life-history traits predict recovery patterns in Collembola species after fire: A 10 year study. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2012, 56, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gundersen, H.A.H.; Leinaas, H.P.; Thaulow, C. Surface Structure and Wetting Characteristics of Collembola Cuticles. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Auclerc, A.; Ponge, J.-F.; Barot, S.; Dubs, F. Experimental assessment of habitat preference and dispersal ability of soil springtails. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 1596–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Smith, B.D.; Foreman, R.E. An assessment of seaweed decomposition within a southern Strait of Georgia seaweed community. Mar. Biol. 1984, 84, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wardle, D.A. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 870–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Smrž, J.; Kováč, Ľ.; Mikeš, J.; Sustr, V.; Lukešová, A.; Tajovský, K.; Nováková, A.; Režňáková, P. Food sources of selected terrestrial cave arthropods. Subterr. Biol. 2015, 16, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Begon, M.; Townsend, C.R.; Harper, J.L. Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2005; p. 750. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wirta, H.K.; Weingartner, E.; Hambäck, P.A.; Roslin, T. Extensive niche overlap among the dominant arthropod predators of the High Arctic. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2015, 16, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bin, Y.; Lin, G.; Russo, S.E.; Huang, Z.; Shen, Y.; Cao, H.; Lian, J.; Ye, W. Testing the competition-colonization trade-off and its correlations with functional trait variations among subtropical tree species. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sterzyńska, M.; Skłodowski, J. Divergence of soil microarthropod (Hexapoda: Collembola) recovery patterns during natural regeneration and regeneration by planting of windthrown pine forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 429, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Salmon, S.; Ponge, J.-F. Species traits and habitats in springtail communities: A regional scale study. Pedobiologia 2012, 55, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gonzalez, A. Metacommunities: Spatial community ecology. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS); Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hågwar, S. Collembola in Norwegian coniferous forest soils. II Vertical distribution. Pedobiologia 1983, 25, 383–401. [Google Scholar]
  70. Hertzberg, K.; Leinaas, H.P.; Ims, R.A. Patterns of abundance and demography: Collembola in a habitat patch gradient. Ecography 1994, 17, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Siepel, H. Biodiversity of soil microarthropods: The filtering of species. Biodivers. Conserv. 1996, 5, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Caruso, T.; Trokhymets, V.; Bargagli, R.; Convey, P. Biotic interactions as a structuring force in soil communities: Evidence from the micro-arthropods of an Antarctic moss model system. Oecologia 2012, 172, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Widenfalk, L.; Malmström, A.; Berg, M.P.; Bengtsson, J. Small-scale Collembola community composition in a pine forest soil—Overdispersion in functional traits indicates the importance of species interactions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Leibold, M.A.; Holyoak, M.; Mouquet, N.; Amarasekare, P.; Chase, J.M.; Hoopes, M.F.; Holt, R.D.; Shurin, J.B.; Law, R.; Tilman, D.; et al. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7, 601–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Widenfalk, L.A.; Bengtsson, J.; Berggren, Å.; Zwiggelaar, K.; Spijkman, E.; Huyer-Brugman, F.; Berg, M.P. Spatially structured environmental filtering of collembolan traits in late successional salt marsh vegetation. Oecologia 2015, 179, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Koop, K.; Newell, R.; Lucas, M. Microbial Regeneration of Nutrients from the Decomposition of Macrophyte Debris on the Shore. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1982, 9, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 10 00568 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of study sites located within the bays at the Barents Sea: 1. Dalne-Zelenetskaya, 2. Plohye Chevry, 3. Medvezhya, 4. Parchniha and 5. and 6. Yarnyshnaya.
Figure 1. Map of study sites located within the bays at the Barents Sea: 1. Dalne-Zelenetskaya, 2. Plohye Chevry, 3. Medvezhya, 4. Parchniha and 5. and 6. Yarnyshnaya.
Biology 10 00568 g001
Biology 10 00568 g002 550
Figure 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) results of Collembola community distribution pattern amongst study habitats (H) and location (B) of the Barents Sea. FA: alive macroalgae, OA: aged macroalgae, T: coastal tundra; digits 1–6 at variant symbols denote replication of sites (B) across time (2010 and 2013 seasons). NMDS model calculated with Bray–Curtis dissimilarity measure. Axes I and II rotated by applying principal component analysis (PCA) and 37 interactions.
Figure 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) results of Collembola community distribution pattern amongst study habitats (H) and location (B) of the Barents Sea. FA: alive macroalgae, OA: aged macroalgae, T: coastal tundra; digits 1–6 at variant symbols denote replication of sites (B) across time (2010 and 2013 seasons). NMDS model calculated with Bray–Curtis dissimilarity measure. Axes I and II rotated by applying principal component analysis (PCA) and 37 interactions.
Biology 10 00568 g002
Biology 10 00568 g003 550
Figure 3. Ordination of the Collembola species in different macroalgal patches and coastal tundra of the Barents Sea. A partial constrained analysis (pCCA) with site (B) and time (Tm) as covariates calculated with log(x10 + 1)-transformed species data; significance level of the effect attributable to covariate bay as block tested by Monte Carlo permutation test under a model with 499 permutations. The full names of the abbreviated species are given in Table 3. T: coastal tundra, OA: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (living macroalgae).
Figure 3. Ordination of the Collembola species in different macroalgal patches and coastal tundra of the Barents Sea. A partial constrained analysis (pCCA) with site (B) and time (Tm) as covariates calculated with log(x10 + 1)-transformed species data; significance level of the effect attributable to covariate bay as block tested by Monte Carlo permutation test under a model with 499 permutations. The full names of the abbreviated species are given in Table 3. T: coastal tundra, OA: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (living macroalgae).
Biology 10 00568 g003
Biology 10 00568 g004 550
Figure 4. Fitted Collembola species response models, using a generalised linear model (GLM) with a second-order polynomial of the predictor variable (habitat scores). T: coastal tundra, OA: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (living macroalgae). The full names of the abbreviated species are given in Table 3.
Figure 4. Fitted Collembola species response models, using a generalised linear model (GLM) with a second-order polynomial of the predictor variable (habitat scores). T: coastal tundra, OA: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (living macroalgae). The full names of the abbreviated species are given in Table 3.
Biology 10 00568 g004
Table
Table 1. Monthly average temperatures (°C), precipitation (in mm H2O) and wind force (in m/s) from the weather station at Teriberka (69°1′ N, 35°1′ E) located on the Barents Sea in July 2010 and 2013. The average temperature, precipitation and wind force in July 2010 and 2013 are given according to the weather station in Teriberka (69°1′ N, 35°1′ E) located on shore of the Barents Sea.
Table 1. Monthly average temperatures (°C), precipitation (in mm H2O) and wind force (in m/s) from the weather station at Teriberka (69°1′ N, 35°1′ E) located on the Barents Sea in July 2010 and 2013. The average temperature, precipitation and wind force in July 2010 and 2013 are given according to the weather station in Teriberka (69°1′ N, 35°1′ E) located on shore of the Barents Sea.
YearTemperature in °CPrecipitation in mm H2OWind Force in m/s
201012.963.96.3
201314.255.36.1
Table
Table 2. Effect of wave exposure and macroalgal age on the macro- and micronutrient content. Values presented in the table are means across replicates of each algal sample (n = 4) with standard deviation (SD). OA: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (living macroalgae).
Table 2. Effect of wave exposure and macroalgal age on the macro- and micronutrient content. Values presented in the table are means across replicates of each algal sample (n = 4) with standard deviation (SD). OA: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (living macroalgae).
NutrientOAFA
TP (mg/L)1.24 ± 0.461.03 ± 0.24
K+ (mg/L) *1.65 ± 0.266.43 ± 0.61
Ca2+ (mg/L) *46.75 ± 13.2822.25 ± 2.06
Mg2+ (mg/L) *18.25 ± 2.0615.50 ± 1.29
TFe (µm/L)0.69 ± 0.530.23 ± 0.06
* Significant differences at 0.05 probability level tested by Mann–Whitney U test.
Table
Table 3. Species composition of Collembola communities in the coastal and intertidal zone of the Barents Sea, code of the abbreviated species and classification of the collembolan species functional traits: life forms (Ep: epigeic, He: hemiedaphic, Eu: euedaphic) and dispersal ability (slow, fast). T: coastal tundra, O: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (living macroalgae), D: density in 103 ind·m−2 ± standard deviation.
Table 3. Species composition of Collembola communities in the coastal and intertidal zone of the Barents Sea, code of the abbreviated species and classification of the collembolan species functional traits: life forms (Ep: epigeic, He: hemiedaphic, Eu: euedaphic) and dispersal ability (slow, fast). T: coastal tundra, O: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (living macroalgae), D: density in 103 ind·m−2 ± standard deviation.
NOCollembolaCodeSea Shore HabitatFunctional Traits
TOAFALife-FormDispersal Ability
Hypogastruridae
1Hypogastrura viatica (Tullberg, 1872)Hv+++EpFast
Neanuridae
2Friesea mirabilis (Tullberg, 1871)Fm++−HeSlow
3Anurida papillosa (Axelson, 1902)Ap+−−HeSlow
Onychiuridae
4Protaphorura bicampata (Gisin, 1956)Prb−+−EuSlow
Tullbergiidae
5Mesaphorura macrochaeta Rusek, 1976Mm+−−EuSlow
Isotomidae
6Tetracanthella arctica Cassagna, 1959Ta++−EpFast
7Pseudanurophorus binoculatus Kseneman, 1934Pb+−−EuSlow
8Folsomia quadrioculata (Tullberg, 1871)Fq++−HeSlow
9Isotomiella minor (Schäffer, 1896)Im+−−EuSlow
10Archisotoma megalops (Bangall, 1939)Am+−−EpFast
11Agrenia bidenticulata (Tullberg, 1877)Ab++−EpSlow
12Pseudisotoma sensibilis (Tullberg, 1876)Ps++−HeSlow
13Parisotoma notabilis (Schäffer, 1896)Pn+−−HeSlow
14Isotoma anglicana Lubbock, 1862Ia+++EpFast
Entomobryidae
15Entomobrya nivalis (Linnaeus, 1758)Entn++−EpFast
16Lepidocyrtus lignorum (Fabricius, 1775)Llig+−−EpFast
Katiannidae
17Sminthurinus aureus (Lubbock, 1862)Sa+−−EpFast
18Sminthurinus concolor (Meinert, 1896)Sc+−−EpFast
Total number of species 1792
Density (D) 8.65 ± 6.48 a12.54 ± 17.53 b0.32 ± 0.25 c
Species richness (S) 7.20 ± 1.40 a2.40.0 ± 1.26 b1.22 ± 0.44 b
Shannon’s index H’ 1.39 ± 0.23 a0.39 ± 0.43 b0.13 ± 0.27 b
Bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Functional trait values in Collembola communities across seashore habitats of the Barents Sea tested by Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA test. Values are means ± standard deviation (SD) across replicates (N = 6). Significant differences are marked by different letters in rows; statistical significance tested by a multiple comparison post hoc test of mean ranks (Dunn’s test) applied after Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA with p < 0.05. T: coastal tundra, O: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (alive macroalgae).
Table 4. Functional trait values in Collembola communities across seashore habitats of the Barents Sea tested by Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA test. Values are means ± standard deviation (SD) across replicates (N = 6). Significant differences are marked by different letters in rows; statistical significance tested by a multiple comparison post hoc test of mean ranks (Dunn’s test) applied after Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA with p < 0.05. T: coastal tundra, O: old algae (decaying macroalgae debris), FA: fresh algae (alive macroalgae).
Functional TraitsTOAFA
Life form:
Epigeic3.89 ± 3.75 a12.43 ± 17.58 b0.29 ± 0.26 c
Hemiedaphic4.54 ± 3.42 a0.10 ± 0.16 b0
Euedaphic0.22 ± 0.34 a0.01 ± 0.03 a0
Dispersal ability:
Fast3.89 ± 3.75 a12.43 ± 17.58 b0.29 ± 0.26 c
Slow4.24 ± 2.47 a0.22 ± 0.25 b0
Bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 5. Effect of site (B), habitat (H) and time (Tm) on variation of Collembola communities across coastal and intertidal habitats indicated by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and partial canonical correspondence analysis (pCCA). Pseudo-F: F-statistic, p: significance level tested by Monte Carlo permutation test, CCA model calculated with log(x + 1)-transformed data.
Table 5. Effect of site (B), habitat (H) and time (Tm) on variation of Collembola communities across coastal and intertidal habitats indicated by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and partial canonical correspondence analysis (pCCA). Pseudo-F: F-statistic, p: significance level tested by Monte Carlo permutation test, CCA model calculated with log(x + 1)-transformed data.
Explanatory VariablesCovariatesCovariate Define BlocksTotal Explained Variance (%)Partial Variance (%)Adjusted Explained Variance (%)Pseudo-Fp-Value
B, H, Tm 50.4 31.42.70.002
HB, TmB 30.024.34.50.002
TmB, HB 10.15.82.40.016
BH, Tm 30.714.21.90.012
Significant p-values are indicated in bold. Variation account using the adjusted R2 approach.
Table
Table 6. GLM regression models for selected Collembola species responses to the seashore habitat gradient. Model based on F-test selection. R2: coefficient of determination, F: value of the F-ratio statistic, p: significance level of the model, O: parameter of species optimum, T: parameter of species tolerance. The full names of the abbreviated species are given in Table 3.
Table 6. GLM regression models for selected Collembola species responses to the seashore habitat gradient. Model based on F-test selection. R2: coefficient of determination, F: value of the F-ratio statistic, p: significance level of the model, O: parameter of species optimum, T: parameter of species tolerance. The full names of the abbreviated species are given in Table 3.
Explanatory VariableSelected ModelNull DevianceDeviance under ModelR2 (%)FpOT
Hvlinear4288.03502.518.34.30.04737NANA
Talinear879.4327.662.743.6<0.00001NANA
Fqquadratic1020.0208.2879.653.9<0.00001−0.8000.467
Entnlinear129.159.254.130.0<0.00001NANA
Fmlinear121.871.141.613.70.00093NANA
Psquadratic126.518.885.250.8<0.00001−0.8240.304
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olejniczak, I.; Sterzyńska, M.; Boniecki, P.; Kaliszewicz, A.; Panteleeva, N. Collembola (Hexapoda) as Biological Drivers between Land and Sea. Biology 2021, 10, 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070568

AMA Style

Olejniczak I, Sterzyńska M, Boniecki P, Kaliszewicz A, Panteleeva N. Collembola (Hexapoda) as Biological Drivers between Land and Sea. Biology. 2021; 10(7):568. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070568

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olejniczak, Izabella, Maria Sterzyńska, Paweł Boniecki, Anita Kaliszewicz, and Ninel Panteleeva. 2021. "Collembola (Hexapoda) as Biological Drivers between Land and Sea" Biology 10, no. 7: 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070568

APA Style

Olejniczak, I., Sterzyńska, M., Boniecki, P., Kaliszewicz, A., & Panteleeva, N. (2021). Collembola (Hexapoda) as Biological Drivers between Land and Sea. Biology, 10(7), 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070568

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop