Next Article in Journal
Modeling and Analysis of the Transverse Surface Roughness in Hollow-Core Fibers
Previous Article in Journal
Polynomial Modeling of Noise Figure in Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Buckling Solution of Fixed–Free Anisotropic Laminated Composite Columns Under Axial Loading

Fibers 2025, 13(4), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13040035
by Rund Al-Masri 1, Hayder A. Rasheed 2,* and Bacim Alali 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Fibers 2025, 13(4), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib13040035
Submission received: 16 November 2024 / Revised: 11 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 February 2025 / Published: 27 March 2025

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The complete list of reviewer 1 comments and the authors' response are listed in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1) Comparison of analytical and numerical buckling load for various layup sequences of 266 Graphite/Epoxy Composite Column needs to be checked. I can see the inconsistency in the results.

 

2) The authors must update their introduction section. For example check recent publication like, Natural frequencies for bending vibrations of smart laminated composite plates reinforced with bamboo fibres, published by Smart Materials & Methods.

 

3) Performance must be shown compared to the current literature, like, Buckling behavior of standing laminated Mindlin plates subjected to body force and vertical loading published by Composite structures.

4) Effect of Column Size is unclear! please explain more.

 

Author Response

The complete list of reviewer 2 comments and the authors' response are listed in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1. It is suggested to add a sentence for clarifying the background and theoretical and quantitative results from this study. 

2. In the introduction section, some research articles are listed. But I think some key contents are lacked, such as the research shortcoming of existing research and some improved points of the applied methods in these studies. In this case, the research novelty and highlights could be pointed out. 

3. Some key points are missing for the simulation result section, such as the detailed model meshes, sizes, sensitivity analysis and verification of the applied model. 

4. Result contour is missing for the FIgure 4 .

5. Are there any results for the best parameter combination from the parameter analysis ?

6. How to verify the comparative results between the formula and simulation results ? 

Author Response

The complete list of reviewer 3 comments and the authors' response are listed in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

accept

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

all concerns have been addressed. 

Back to TopTop