Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of Effect of Fiber Length on Mechanical, Wear, and Morphological Behavior of Silane-Treated Pineapple Leaf Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Statistical Modeling of Compressive Strength of Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Concrete—HFRC
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Transverse Compressive Modulus of Carbon Fibers during Wet Spinning of Polyacrylonitrile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact Resistance of Rendering Mortars with Natural and Textile-Acrylic Waste Fibres
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recycling Process of a Basalt Fiber-Epoxy Laminate by Solvolysis: Mechanical and Optical Tests

by
Livia Persico
1,†,
Giorgia Giacalone
2,†,
Beatrice Cristalli
1,†,
Carla Tufano
1,†,
Eudora Saccorotti
1,†,
Pietro Casalone
2,3 and
Giuliana Mattiazzo
2,3,*
1
Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
2
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
3
MORElab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fibers 2022, 10(6), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10060055
Submission received: 13 May 2022 / Revised: 3 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 June 2022 / Published: 17 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fiber Composite Process)

Abstract

:
Basalt fibre epoxy composites well suit various engineering applications for their mechanical properties and chemical stability. However, after basalt/epoxy product lifespan, there are not many established ways to treat and recycle the fibers without deteriorating their physical, mechanical and chemical properties. In this study, a chemical recycling method for basalt fiber reinforced polymers is presented. The process is based on previous studies concerning carbon fibers epoxy composites in which the fibers are separated from the polymeric matrix through a solvolysis reaction at temperature below 160 °C. Firstly, the specimens are thermally pre-treated in a heater set over the glass transition temperature, to promote the polymeric swelling of the matrix. The chemical degradation is obtained by means of a solution of glacial acetic acid (AcOH) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2): compact, clean, resin-free, recycled woven fabrics are obtained and the original length of the yarns is maintained. Breaking tenacity of the recycled basalt fibers is kept up to 90.5% compared to the virgin ones, while, with a pyrolysis treatment, this value cannot exceed the 35%.

1. Introduction

Glass and carbon fibers are widely used as reinforcements in composites owing to their excellent mechanical and thermal properties. Anyway, their production and their disposal still have a great ecological impact. For this reason, researchers in recent years have focused their studies on alternative sustainable solutions, such as basalt fibers, exploring also innovative recycling techniques.
Basalt is a volcanic rock among the most common minerals on the Earth surface. It is mainly composed of oxides such as S i O 2 , A l 2 O 3 , CaO, MgO and other oxides in concentrations of less than 5% (Figure 1) [1].
Basalt fibers can be directly produced from basalt rock, following a manufacturing process without additives, so they are considered natural fibers, even if they are not effectively biodegradable [2]. Basalt continuous fibers are extruded through small nozzles directly by crushed and melted basalt rock (melting temperature around 1350–1420 °C). Energy and cost requirements of basalt production are higher than E-glass (E-GF) but similar to S-glass (S-GF); however, the high availability of the raw material and the fact that, unlike GF, it does not require additives, as mentioned before, makes the manufacturing process cheaper and more sustainable [3,4,5].
In comparison with glass and carbon fibers some considerations must be pointed out concerning mechanical and thermal features. Although BFs has al slightly higher density than glass and carbon fibers (CF), tensile strength is higher than E-GFs and S-GFs, while it is still comparable to that of CF (Table 1). Furthermore, basalt fibers are also stiffer than glass fibers but less stiff than carbon fibers (Table 1). Elongation at break of basalt fibers (BF) is higher than that of glass and carbon fibers (Table 1). Recent studies by Plappert et al. investigated tension, compression, and shear of BFs and epoxy specimens and confirmed the abovementioned [6].
Furthermore, basalt fibers have good thermal and chemical properties, such as resistance to heat and a good chemical inertia [7,8]. In fact, basalt products do not generate toxic reactions with air or water, during their life cycle; they are non-combustible and in contact with other chemicals they do not activate chemical reactions that can harm the environment [5].
Such material is interesting due to its function as reinforcement of thermosetting polymers; examples are epoxy, polyester and vinyl ester resins [9]. BFs have, indeed, an excellent bonding nature, so when embedded within an organic binder, composite materials with great wear resistance and synergistic effects are obtained [10]. Additionally, basalt fibers and glass fibers are characterized by the need for a sizing agent to ensure profitability, processability and performance. The sizing agent is designed to form a thin layer to protect, lubricate and hold together fibers during transportation and weaving; it also acts as a coupling agent for a better adhesion of the matrix to the fibers [11]. Mechanical properties of ceramic fibers are flaw-dependant due to their brittle failure—in fact, the reduction in their properties is often attributed to the growth of surface flaws for handling without appropriate lubrication, degradation of the sizing with thermal or chemical methods [12].
Basalt fibers are often adopted in marine application thanks to their lightness and their corrosion resistance. As shown in the research of Lu et al., basalt has good durability in seawater; for an immersion time in artificial seawater of 15 days or less at 20 °C, tensile strength is preserved, and elongation at break also slightly decreases after 30 days. The epoxy matrix protects the basalt fibers after salted water desorption thanks to the post-curing process and salt precipitation [13]. Another piece of research, by Sukur and Onal, on BFRP for marine applications demonstrates the benefits of graphene nanoplatelet modification of the epoxy matrix which leads to less water absorption and basalt fiber’s properties preservation [14].
Moreover, basalt fibers are often used in manufacturing of protective equipment for firefighters, and of whatsoever requires proper fire resistance and high melting temperature [15]. Actually, basalt fibers have a wider temperature range of stability than most ceramics implied in composite materials [16]. Sim et al. have tested basalt fibers at high temperature environment (1200 °C for 2 h), representative of a fire event. Compared to carbon and glass fibers that lose their volumetric stability, basalt fibers maintained their shape and mechanical integrity. Thermal stability and heat resistance is a consequence of basalt mineralogical and chemical composition and presence of micorpores [17,18]. The relation between the surface modifications of basalt fibers and their thermal and fire properties in flame-retardant epoxy composites was investigated by Guo et al. in more recent studies. The importance of an optimized pre-treatment of BF surface is highlighted for best performance in flame-retardant epoxy composites [19].
However, the environmental impact of waste BFRP disposal, such as that of glass and carbon fiber reinforced polymer, is huge. The estimated time of the BFRP degradation process is about 50–100 years. Besides landfilling, incineration treatment could be another solution to dispose of basalt fibers; however, one downside of this method is is that it produces harmful air pollution. Some of the toxic compounds found in the burning smoke are nitrogen oxides, chlorinated hydrocarbons, sulphur dioxide and dioxins [20].
For this purpose, new eco-friendly methods of recycling have been developed—including methods which guarantee the possibility of reusing basalt fabric—for different applications to reduce the environmental footprint of products. A mechanical recycling technique allows the same original chemical structure of molecules to be retained. This method could be a perfect sustainable option because it does not create or use dangerous substances; in addition, it requires a small amount of energy and air pollution is not generated.
However, short fibers are the final result of this recycling process; chopped fibers can be used as an additive charge for geopolymers and as fillers for products with lower mechanical properties (e.g., reinforced concretes or mats) [21].
Two other possible approaches are thermal and chemical techniques. The most diffused type of thermal recovery of the fibers consists of incineration of the polymer matrix; microwave pyrolysis is another example that could minimize energy consumption and avoid secondary air pollution. However, recycling methods through pyrolysis may cause a drop in the mechanical properties of basalt fibers up to 65% due to the activation of surface flaw growth and degradation of the sizing [12]. Previous studies have shown that it is possible to regain up to 94% of initial mechanical strength by a chemical regeneration process in a cloridric acid (HCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution [22]. Basalt fibers remelting is also a possible recycling option, as long as the woven fabrics, rowings, yarns or single fibers are completely free from any residual matrix.
Researchers have developed efficient chemical recycling mechanisms for basalt fiber thermoplastic composites that completely remove the matrix from the woven fabric: methods of solvolysis in acetone with ultrasound and mechanical stirring were applied to an acrylate-based basalt composite obtaining well recycled fibers [23].
On the other hand, concerning the degradation of thermosetting polymeric matrices, previous analyses had mainly focused on carbon fibers epoxy composites (CFRP) with examples of both chemical degradation, such as acid digestion and depolymerization [24,25]. Several studies have investigated recycling through solvolysis of thermosetting matrices but none, to the authors’ knowledge, have investigated the effects of this chemical treatment on the mechanical properties of BFs. The durability of basalt in alkaline environment has been studied by Wu et al. and they confirmed that their resistance is relatively weak due to the reactions between silica of the fibers and hydroxyl groups [26]. Considering basalt behavior with strong bases, acid treatment is preferable to alkaline treatment. Among all the possible acid options, peracetic acid, obtained from the reaction between acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide is strong enough to allow for matrix degradation.
In this document, an optimized version of the recycling processes by Ma and Nutt and Das et al. has been studied and applied to BF/epoxy composites in order to assess and test the quality of the recovered fibers [24,25]. The experiments were based on the oxidative degradation of the epoxy matrix with peracetic acid (PAA), taking advantage of the good chemical resistance of basalt fibers. A chemical pre-treatment was examined, but a thermal pre-treatment was considered way more eco-friendly as it allows for other reagents to be avoided and minimizes energy consumption estimated by an LCA of the process; moreover, it also leads to potential for industrial scaling of the experiment.
The laminated composite specimen (basalt/epoxy) underwent a curing process at room temperature and was then heated above glass transition temperature into a laboratory oven. This pre-treatment ensures the swelling of epoxy to enhance diffusion of PAA into the matrix. The chemical solvolysis was carried out immediately afterwards. At the end of the recycling process tensile tests were performed on the recovered fibers following ASTM D2256 indications, to establish a possible reduction in terms of mechanical properties [27,28,29]. Finally, SEM analyses were carried out to ensure the efficacy of the implemented chemical technique and to verify that there was no trace of epoxy resin on the surface of the single strands.
The outcomes of this work provide information about an efficient way to recover woven basalt fibers. The recycled specimen kept the original weaving after solvolysis method. Further, the breaking tenacity loss registered through mechanical tests was investigated per standard ASTM D2256 and the chemical composition of the fabric was examined. The process scheme is shown in Figure 2. This research aims to provide a valid recycling alternative for BFRP. The impact of this research is promoting the use of natural fibers with excellent properties—hence basalt fibers—in polymer reinforcement by demonstrating the possibility of fiber recovery. Hereinafter, an efficient chemical recycling method of BFRP is presented: mechanical property maintenance is proved, and a weaving pattern of the specimen tested is retained. The method involves the use of weak acids and peroxides, less toxic to people and less harmful to the environment than the chemicals often used in recycling processes. The possibility of obtaining resin free recycled woven fabrics may allow both the re-melting and re-lamination of the recovered basalt reinforces.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

The recycling process is tested on commercial-grade basalt fibers, supplied by Isomatex (Gembloux–Belgium), fabric reference: WFBSB3_0200.XXX.0127.T2/2.ISAA. The fabric surface weight is 200 g/cm3 (EN 12127) with elementary diameters from 9.0 to 11.0 µm, volume density of constituent yarns of 2.600 gr/cm3 (according to ASTM C693), and twill pattern [30]. The original size of the basalt fabric tested are about 210 × 750 mm2.
The epoxy resin used is SR GreenPoxy 33 (resin and hardener reference: SZ 8525), produced by Sicomin (Chateauneuf les Martigues—France). The resin has a density of 1.159 g/cm3, while the hardener has a density of 0.94 g/cm3 at 20 °C. Resin and hardner mix viscosity at T = 20 °C is 1300 mPa s. Curing was carried out at a 20 °C temperature: extimated gel time of 1.5 h and completely cured after 6.3 h. Glass transition temperature of the cured resin is 80 °C after a 20 °C curing process. It has a bio-based carbon content of about 34–36%.

2.2. Lamination

A hand lay-up lamination process was carried out to obtain the composite specimen. A cylindrical mould in PVC, coated with a wax release agent to facilitate the detachment of the sample, was used to shape a specimen suitable for chemical laboratory beakers. The hand lay up (HLU) lamination process, shown in Figure 3, is a practical and cheaper way to mould a wide range of geometries.
Liquid resin was poured and spread over the 710 × 250 mm2 piece of basalt fabric with rollers and spatulas to ensure a correct and homogeneous fiber wetting. The fabric was then rolled on the mould; peel-ply was applied to guarantee a better surface finish, then bleeding ply and breather ply were applied to absorb the excess resin and shield the specimen from the environment during curing. Curing took place at room temperature for more than 24 h.
The result was a composite sample in a cylindrical shape with an internal diameter of 70 mm and a thickness of 0.65 mm.

2.3. Pre-Treatment

As shown in previous studies, the acid digestion rate was mainly diffusion controlled. Before the immersion of the specimen in the acid treatment solution, a swelling pre-treatment was needed to further enhance the degradation mechanism of the matrix by the acid solution and speed up the process time [24]. The specimen is heated above the resin glass transition temperature (Tg = 80 °C) in a warmed-up heater for 60 min at 90 °C. This pre-treatment could be used on every type of ceramic fiber because it is relevant to the resin behaviour only. Epoxy resin at room temperature behaves as a compact and fragile solid, while over the Tg, the free volume exponentially increases among the polymeric chains. This phenomenon changes the material appearance, as it becomes a rubbery solid and allows a faster and more efficient diffusion of the treatment solution throughout the matrix.
Immediately after removing the specimen from the heater, it was rapidly immersed in the treatment solution.

2.4. Treatment

The epoxy decomposition consists of the oxidation of C-OH groups to C=O and in the breaking of the C-N bonds. The free radical mechanism is initiated by both H-O radicals generated by hydrogen peroxide and the acyloxy radicals from the peracetic acid. The mechanism can be described as follows:
The O-O bond in paracetic acid is unstable, so it generates the radicals from the PAA (1):
CH3COOOH → CH3COO• + •OH
The hydroxyl radical reacts with the paracetic acid itself (2) and (3):
CH3COOOH + OH•→ CH3CO• + O2 + H2O
CH3COOOH + OH•→ CH3COOO• + H2O
Acyloxy radicals decompose (4) and (5):
CH3COO•→ •CH3 + CO2
2 CH3COO•→ 2 CH3• + 2 CO + O2
The methyl radical now formed is also unstable, and so it reacts with oxygen to form the peroxy radical (6).
•CH3 + O2 → •CH3OO
The free radicals re-create the PAA (7):
CH3COO•+ OH• → CH3COOOH
At this stage, the formation of phenols and phenolic derivatives occurs during the decomposition reaction.
The C–N bond is a weak bond and so it is attacked by the acyloxy (Figure 4) and the hydroxyl (Figure 5).
The acid solution, composed of 91% vol of acetic acid (AcOH 14M) and 9% of hydrogen peroxide H 2 O 2 30% wt), is prepared in a beaker covered with aluminium foil to avoid extended evaporation. The use of this set up keeps the largest quantity of the solution in the beaker for future recycling processes.
The solution was positioned on a magnetic-stirred thermal plate at maximum power. When a temperature of 110 °C ± 5 °C was reached, the specimen was put inside the beaker and the treatment began.
The solution temperature was maintained at 110 °C for 1.5 h until the polymer matrix was fully dissolved and the matrix was visibly free from it.

2.5. Post-Treatment

After the required time for solvolysis, the beaker is cooled in a water crystallizer at room temperature. The solution is collected for possible future distillation and the recovered fabric was washed first in abundant acetone (98% vol) to remove matrix residues and then in distilled water to neutralize the surface. Subsequently, the specimen was unrolled to obtain a basalt fabric as compact and regular as possible. Then, it was dabbed with absorbent paper. After 24 h of drying at room temperature, the specimen was ready for mechanical testing.

2.6. Mechanical Testing

From the variation of the mechanical properties, it is possible to determine the efficiency of the recycling method: for this reason, tensile tests are performed both on virgin and recycled fiber strands, under the same environmental condition, to obtain concrete reference values in relation to the machinery used.
The indications of ASTM D2256 have been followed, so a preconditioning of the fibers before the tensile tests could be carried out [27,28,29]. Preconditioning consists of placing the fabric in a heater at 110 °C ± 1 °C at atmospheric pressure for 60 min to eliminate every trace of humidity.
Once the basalt fabrics were unrolled, longitudinal fiber strands were carefully pulled out in the direction of extraction with the aid of forceps. Ten fiber strands for both recycled and virgin fabric were weighed and measured in length.
Then, every single yarn was placed in an MTS QTest/10, the tensile testing machine, at a gauge length of 200 mm, aligned exactly parallel to the applied force, and held in position by the pressure of a screw, squeezing it on the surface of the 25 mm-radius cylindrical clamps. Two layers of paper, inserted between the fiber and the surface of the cylinder and the screw, were functional to prevent the fiber from slipping and being damaged by the screw thread (Figure 6). Each fiber yarn was pre-tensioned with a load of approximately 3.532 N and then subjected to traction at an elongation rate of 45,000 mm/min.
According to ASTM D2256, tensile tests were performed until five valid specimens were obtained for both virgin and recycled yarns. The samples that slipped during the test and/or those that broke near the clamp attachments were excluded from the data processing.

2.7. SEM Analysis

In preparation for SEM analysis, as basalt fibers were not conductive themselves, selected samples were covered with a layer of gold with a thickness of 5 nm, by means of a Quorum Technologies Q150R S/E/ES sputter. To achieve the typical thickness of 5 nm used for SEM applications, a current of 20 mA and sputter time of 15 s were set. The samples chosen for analysis are the recycled and the virgin woven fabrics, the lateral surface of the fibers and their fracture surface.
All the specimens were analysed using a high-resolution SEM (Tescan Vega) that also provides a qualitative chemical EDS analysis. These visual and chemical analyses investigate the surface morphology, the appearance of resin, eventual damages or impurities that caused fracture [31].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Visual Analysis

The woven fabrics are visually free from resin: they are shiny, clean and their colour is very similar to the one of virgin fibers; no irregularities were observed either on the yarns or on the single fiber.

3.2. Mechanical Testing

The information of the performed tests is collected using TestWorks data analysis software. Force-elongation curves (Figure 7 and Figure 8) permit the evaluation of various properties such as elongation at break and the area under the curve, which is proportional to work done to break the yarn, resulting in a measure of toughness [27,28,29].
Breaking tenacity is considered a comparative index between virgin and recycled fibers, and it is calculated as follows (8):
B = F T
where: B is the breaking tenacity (cN/tex), F is the breaking force (cN) and T is the linear density (tex). The nominal linear density is a distinctive feature of yarns and from technical sheet it is equal to 68 tex, according to the type of fabric [32]. Figure 9 shows that the recycled specimens show lower breaking tenacity values than those of the virgin ones, in agreement with what has been reported previously. In detail, breaking tenacity of the recycled fibers is kept up to 90.5% on average compared to the virgin ones.
Recycled fibers register a reduction in mechanical properties compared to the virgin ones.
This phenomenon may be attributed to several factors, such as the formation of surface defects during fiber handling and potentially to partial removal of fiber sizing due to solvolysis. The role of sizing is to improve the fiber–matrix interface due to the characteristic functional groups of the coupling agents, to preserve fiber quality by reducing frictional forces between fibers and to facilitate composite weaving and manufacturing. The most common composite recycling treatments such as solvolysis and pyrolysis do not guarantee, indeed, the presence of the original sizing at the end of the process, causing a consequent reduction in mechanical properties. As suggested by Thomason, several studies find a correlation between the presence of sizing with a reduction in existing defects through the formation of a surface film, which also limits their subsequent occurrence [33]. According to the studies of Briard et al. the presence of sizing contributes to an increase in fiber strength of up to 75% compared to untreated fibers thanks to a crack tip bridging process [34]. However, surface regeneration techniques are been investigated leading to a strength regain up to 95% utilising an NaOH and up to 70% with an HCl solution [35].

3.3. SEM Analysis

Recycled woven basalt fabric appears resin-free (Figure 10) and the surface quality is comparable to the virgin one (Figure 11).
The recycled fiber lateral surface seems smooth and free from any residual resin (Figure 12). In both virgin (Figure 13) and recycled fibers, silica spherical particles are heterogeneously spread on the surface: they may result in probable fracture nucleation sites.
Fracture surface reveal the typical brittle fracture, characteristic of ceramic fibers. The surface can be divided in three distinct regions listed from the nucleation site: mirror, mist and hackle. Fracture nucleated from the fiber portion indicated in the circles and can be easily identified following the cleavage lines. The size of the mirror zone in relation to fiber diameter, compared to other of thermally affected fibers in the literature, is considerably smaller. Moreover it is similar to that of thermally unaltered basalt fibers [12,22]. The temperature at which the chemical treatment is carried out does not cause a modification in the fracture pattern on the fiber surface and does not damages the fiber itself. Most of the fibers are characterized by a typical semicircular fracture mirror, as fracture generates from the surface. That could be caused both by superficial impurities, common in basalt fiber chemical composition and by superficial damage (Figure 14). The reduction in mechanical properties, due to the flaw dependency of basalt fibers, can be attributed to the growth of surface flaws during the process: handling and lamination could in fact cause friction defects and the solvolysis process could remove part of the sizing or cause flaw growth due to mild acid degradation of surface.
The chemical composition of the fibers is inhomogeneous and small bulk impurities or porosity inside the volume result as a stress-collector regions shown in Figure 15, accordingly to Griffith’s model [31].
The chemical composition of recycled woven fabric, as shown in the qualitative spectra (Figure 16) obtained through EDS qualitative analysis, closely relates to that of the virgin woven fabric (Figure 17).
The possible carbon content indicates residual organic particles of resin; however, no carbon is detected above the instrument sensitivity.
The major peaks detected were those corresponding to silicon, aluminium and oxygen. This is coherent with basalt theoretical composition of SiO2 and Al2O3 [5]. EDS analysis also detected the presence of traces of other metallic elements such as magnesium, calcium, zinc, titanium and iron in oxidized form. The appearance of the gold picks may be a direct consequence of sample preparation with a gold spray to enhance electrical conductivity.

4. Conclusions

Nowadays, many governments place restrictions on landfilling of waste composite material, so investigating different recycling methods could be not only interesting from a scientific standpoint, but also crucial for the environment.
Thermal recycling method is easier and faster, nevertheless basalt fibers demonstrate a significant loss of mechanical properties due to the temperature range usually adopted: high temperatures and sizing pyrolysis cause a massive growth of not negligible surface defects, leading to the loss of 65% of original mechanical properties. On the other hand, a chemical treatment, such as solvolysis, is less invasive to the fibers, allowing a better maintenance of mechanical properties.
The results reported prove the potential of recycling BFRP by solvolysis: breaking tenacity is kept up to 90.5% compared to the untreated corresponding fibers. SEM analyses proved that surface and bulk flaws cause brittle failure. An increase of surface flaws is thought to be the consequence of handling, lamination and only at last of recycling process. Basalt fibers, indeed, have a high acid resistance and are not affected by mild acids, due to their chemical inertia.
The presented experimental study provides accurate information about the possibility to produce a recycled basalt fabric with a clean and resin-free superficial morphology and with the same original weaving. Thanks to the small reduction in mechanical properties, recovered fibers could be re-used for new composites.
The innovative aspect of this recycling process is the usage of a weak acid that could be recovered from the solution through distillation. Future studies will be related to a distillation process of the thermosetting matrix: the authors’ primary intention is developing a complete recycling process of the whole composite produced. Pursuing this further, the circularity of the described process makes it worthwhile for an industrial scale implementation.
In conclusion, concerning the lack of information in the literature, more research on eco-friendly methods for BFRP recycling should be carried out, in preparation for the future widespread use of this natural fiber with high mechanical properties.

Author Contributions

Chemical and method explanation C.T.; Mechanical testing data analysis G.G., L.P.; SEM analysis B.C., G.G., Conceptualization, B.C., G.G., L.P., C.T., E.S.; methodology, B.C., G.G., L.P., C.T., E.S.; validation, B.C., G.G., L.P., C.T., E.S.; investigation, B.C., G.G., L.P., C.T., E.S.; resources, B.C., G.G., L.P., C.T., E.S.; data curation, B.C., G.G., L.P., C.T., E.S.; writing review and editing, B.C., G.G., L.P., C.T., E.S., P.C., G.M.; illustrations, E.S., G.G.; visualization, B.C., G.G., L.P., C.T., E.S.; supervision, P.C.; found acquisition, G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Polito Sailing Team at Polytechnic of Turin.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Alessandro Cogo, team Leader of Polito Sailing Team at Polytechnic of Turin for the financial support. They would like to thank Luca Lavagna for the support during laboratory activities, Marco Roncarolo, Serena De Lucia, Riccardo Monero, Ludovica Maria Gullo and Martina Fragalà for the help given in the research and method implementation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dalinkevich, A.A.; Gumargalieva, K.Z.; Marakhovsky, S.S.; Soukhanov, A.V. Modern basalt fibrous materials and basalt fibre-based polymeric composites. J. Nat. Fibers 2009, 6, 248–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vikas, G.; Sudheer, M. Basalt fiber, Polymer composites, Natural fibers. Am. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 7, 156–165. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vaidya, U. 3.7 Basalt Fibers. In Composites for Automotive, Truck and Mass Transit—Materials, Design, Manufacturing; DEStech Publications: Lancaster, PA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lapena, M.H.; Marinucci, G. Mechanical Characterization of Basalt and Glass Fiber Epoxy Composite Tube. Mater. Res. 2017, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Militký, J.; Mishra, R.; Jamshaid, H. Basalt fibers. In Handbook of Properties of Textile and Technical Fibres; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 805–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Plappert, D.; Ganzenmüller, G.C.; May, M.; Beisel, S. Mechanical properties of a unidirectional basalt-fiber/epoxy composite. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sarasini, F.; Tirillò, J.; Seghini, M.C. Influence of thermal conditioning on tensile behaviour of single basalt fibres. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 132, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, B.; Cao, H.; Song, S. Tensile behavior contrast of basalt and glass fibers after chemical treatment. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4244–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, M.; Kim, M.; Rhee, K.; Park, S. Study on an oxygen plasma treatment of a basalt fiber and its effect on the interlaminar fracture property of basalt/epoxy woven composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2011, 42, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, X.; Ouyang, J.; Yang, H.; Tan, Q. Effect of Basalt Fibers for Reinforcing Resin-Based Brake Composites. Minerals 2020, 10, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thomason, J. A review of the analysis and characterisation of polymeric glass fibre sizings. Polym. Test. 2020, 85, 106421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhat, T.; Fortomaris, D.; Kandare, E.; Mouritz, A.P. Properties of thermally recycled basalt fibres and basalt fibre composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 1933–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lu, Z.; Jiang, M.; Pan, Y.; Xian, G.; Yang, M. Durability of basalt fibers, glass fibers, and their reinforced polymer composites in artificial seawater. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 1961–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sukur, E.F.; Onal, G. Long-term salt-water durability of GNPs reinforced basalt-epoxy multiscale composites for marine applications. Tribol. Int. 2021, 158, 106910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Matkó, S.; Keszei, S.; Csontos, I.; Anna, P.; Marosi, G.; Zsuga, M.; Borda, J.; Nagy, G. Fire Retarded Insulating Sheets from Recycled Materials. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 233, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deák, T.; Czigány, T. Chemical Composition and Mechanical Properties of Basalt and Glass Fibers: A Comparison. Text. Res. J. 2009, 79, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sim, J.; Park, C.; Moon, D.Y. Characteristics of basalt fiber as a strengthening material for concrete structures. Compos. Part B Eng. 2005, 36, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pareek, K.; Saha, D.P. Basalt Fiber and Its Composites: An Overview. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Advances in Structural Technologies (CoAST-2019), Silchar, India, 1–3 February 2019; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo, Y.; Zhou, M.; Yin, G.Z.; Kalali, E.; Wang, N.; Wang, D.Y. Basalt Fiber-Based Flame Retardant Epoxy Composites: Preparation, Thermal Properties, and Flame Retardancy. Materials 2021, 14, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, X. Mineral fibres: Basalt. In Handbook of Natural Fibres, 2nd ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2020; Volume 1, pp. 433–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hui, D.; Chen, M.; Wu, Z. Study of melting properties of basalt based on their mineral components. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 116, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lilli, M.; Sarasini, F.; Fausto, L.D.; González, C.; Fernández, A.; Lopes, C.S.; Tirillò, J. Chemical regeneration of thermally conditioned basalt fibres. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Reckendorf, I.M.Z.; Sahki, A.; Perrin, D.; Lacoste, C.; Bergeret, A.; Ohayon, A.; Morand, K. Chemical Recycling of Vacuum-Infused Thermoplastic Acrylate-Based Composites Reinforced by Basalt Fabrics. Polymers 2022, 14, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, Y.; Nutt, S. Chemical treatment for recycling of amine/epoxy composites at atmospheric pressure. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 153, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Das, M.; Chacko, R.; Varughese, S. An Efficient Method of Recycling of CFRP Waste Using Peracetic Acid. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1564–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, J.; Wang, Q.; Guan, Z. Material properties of basalt fibre reinforced concrete made with recycled earthquake waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 130, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ASTM D578/D578M-18; Standard Specification for Glass Fiber Strands 1. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018. [CrossRef]
  28. ASTM D76/D76M-21; Standard Specification for Tensile Testing Machines for Textiles 1. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021. [CrossRef]
  29. ASTM D2256/D2256M-21; Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Yarns by the Single-Strand Method 1. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021. [CrossRef]
  30. ASTM C693-93(2019); Designation: C693–93 Standard Test Method for Density of Glass by Buoyancy 1. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019. [CrossRef]
  31. ASTM C1322-15(2019); Standard Practice for Fractography and Characterization of Fracture Origins in Advanced Ceramics 1. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019. [CrossRef]
  32. ISO 1899:2009; Reinforcement Yarns-Determination of Linear Density. BSI Group Headquarters: London, UK, 2009.
  33. Thomason, J. Glass Fibre Sizing: A Review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 127, 105619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Briard, R.; Heitz, C.; Barthel, E. Crack Bridging Mechanism for Glass Strengthening by Organosilane Water-Based Coatings. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2005, 351, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tirillò, J.; Sarasini, F.; Fausto, L.D.; Gonzalez, C.; Fernandez, A.; Lopes, C.S. Recycled Basalt Fibres: Fracture Toughness Evaluation Furthermore, Strength Regeneration. In Proceedings of the ECCM18—18th European Conference on Composite Materials, Athens, Greece, 24–28 June 2018; pp. 24–28. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Composition of basalt may vary depending on the extraction site, it may also include small quantities of other oxides such as P 2 O 5 , M n O and C r 2 O 3 .
Figure 1. Composition of basalt may vary depending on the extraction site, it may also include small quantities of other oxides such as P 2 O 5 , M n O and C r 2 O 3 .
Fibers 10 00055 g001
Figure 2. Recycling process of basalt fibers by solvolysis.
Figure 2. Recycling process of basalt fibers by solvolysis.
Fibers 10 00055 g002
Figure 3. HLU lamination of the specimens: (a) Impregnation of virgin basalt fabric (brown) with epoxy resin (green); (b) Impregnated fabric and PVC pipe coated with wax release agent used as a mould; (c) Rolling of the impregnated fabric on a PVC pipe; (e) Stratification of plies for curing process of resin; (d) Cylindrical specimen in BFRP.
Figure 3. HLU lamination of the specimens: (a) Impregnation of virgin basalt fabric (brown) with epoxy resin (green); (b) Impregnated fabric and PVC pipe coated with wax release agent used as a mould; (c) Rolling of the impregnated fabric on a PVC pipe; (e) Stratification of plies for curing process of resin; (d) Cylindrical specimen in BFRP.
Fibers 10 00055 g003
Figure 4. Reaction mechanism of decomposition of amine crosslinked epoxy by acyloxy radical.
Figure 4. Reaction mechanism of decomposition of amine crosslinked epoxy by acyloxy radical.
Fibers 10 00055 g004
Figure 5. Reaction mechanism of hydroxyl radical with amine crosslinked epoxy.
Figure 5. Reaction mechanism of hydroxyl radical with amine crosslinked epoxy.
Fibers 10 00055 g005
Figure 6. Tensile test setup.
Figure 6. Tensile test setup.
Fibers 10 00055 g006
Figure 7. Force vs. Elongation curve of virgin basalt fibers.
Figure 7. Force vs. Elongation curve of virgin basalt fibers.
Fibers 10 00055 g007
Figure 8. Force vs. Elongation curve of recycled basalt fibers.
Figure 8. Force vs. Elongation curve of recycled basalt fibers.
Fibers 10 00055 g008
Figure 9. Breaking tenacity comparison between virgin and recycled specimens.
Figure 9. Breaking tenacity comparison between virgin and recycled specimens.
Fibers 10 00055 g009
Figure 10. Recycled Basalt Fiber Woven Fabric.
Figure 10. Recycled Basalt Fiber Woven Fabric.
Fibers 10 00055 g010
Figure 11. Virgin Basalt Fiber Woven Fabric.
Figure 11. Virgin Basalt Fiber Woven Fabric.
Fibers 10 00055 g011
Figure 12. Lateral surface of virgin basalt single fiber.
Figure 12. Lateral surface of virgin basalt single fiber.
Fibers 10 00055 g012
Figure 13. Lateral surface of recycled basalt single fiber.
Figure 13. Lateral surface of recycled basalt single fiber.
Fibers 10 00055 g013
Figure 14. Fracture of recycled basalt single fiber nucleated from the surface: the small circle indicates the nucleation site.
Figure 14. Fracture of recycled basalt single fiber nucleated from the surface: the small circle indicates the nucleation site.
Fibers 10 00055 g014
Figure 15. Fracture of recycled basalt single fiber nucleated from the bulk: the small circle indicates the nucleation site.
Figure 15. Fracture of recycled basalt single fiber nucleated from the bulk: the small circle indicates the nucleation site.
Fibers 10 00055 g015
Figure 16. Recycled basalt woven fabric EDS analysis.
Figure 16. Recycled basalt woven fabric EDS analysis.
Fibers 10 00055 g016
Figure 17. Virgin basalt woven fabric EDS analysis.
Figure 17. Virgin basalt woven fabric EDS analysis.
Fibers 10 00055 g017
Table 1. Comparison of basalt fiber properties to other types of fibers commonly used as polymer matrix reinforcement [3].
Table 1. Comparison of basalt fiber properties to other types of fibers commonly used as polymer matrix reinforcement [3].
Young Modulus [GPa]Tensile Strenght [MPa]Elongation at Failure [%]Maximum Application Temperature [°C]
Basalt93–1103000–48403.1–6∼650
E-Glass72.5–75.53100–38004.7∼380
S2-Glass83–864020–46505.3∼500
Carbon230–8003500–40000.5–1.5∼400
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Persico, L.; Giacalone, G.; Cristalli, B.; Tufano, C.; Saccorotti, E.; Casalone, P.; Mattiazzo, G. Recycling Process of a Basalt Fiber-Epoxy Laminate by Solvolysis: Mechanical and Optical Tests. Fibers 2022, 10, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10060055

AMA Style

Persico L, Giacalone G, Cristalli B, Tufano C, Saccorotti E, Casalone P, Mattiazzo G. Recycling Process of a Basalt Fiber-Epoxy Laminate by Solvolysis: Mechanical and Optical Tests. Fibers. 2022; 10(6):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10060055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Persico, Livia, Giorgia Giacalone, Beatrice Cristalli, Carla Tufano, Eudora Saccorotti, Pietro Casalone, and Giuliana Mattiazzo. 2022. "Recycling Process of a Basalt Fiber-Epoxy Laminate by Solvolysis: Mechanical and Optical Tests" Fibers 10, no. 6: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10060055

APA Style

Persico, L., Giacalone, G., Cristalli, B., Tufano, C., Saccorotti, E., Casalone, P., & Mattiazzo, G. (2022). Recycling Process of a Basalt Fiber-Epoxy Laminate by Solvolysis: Mechanical and Optical Tests. Fibers, 10(6), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10060055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop