Next Article in Journal
State of the Art in the Development and Properties of Protein-Based Films and Coatings and Their Applicability to Cellulose Based Products: An Extensive Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Surface Treatments and Functional Coatings for Biocompatibility Improvement and Bacterial Adhesion Reduction in Dental Implantology
Previous Article in Journal
UV-LED Curing Efficiency of Wood Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revisiting the Challenges in Fabricating Uniform Coatings with Polyfunctional Molecules on High Surface Energy Materials
 
 
Review

The Porter-Whitesides Discrepancy: Revisiting Odd-Even Effects in Wetting Properties of n-Alkanethiolate SAMs

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, 2220 Hoover Hall, Ames, IA 50011, USA
2
Micro-Electronic Research Center, Iowa State University, 133 Applied Sciences Complex I, 1925 Scholl Road, Ames, IA 50011, USA
3
Biopolymer and Biocomposites Research Team, Center for Bioplastics and Biocomposites, Iowa State University, 1041 Food Sciences Building, Ames, IA 50011, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: James Tsoi
Coatings 2015, 5(4), 1034-1055; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5041034
Received: 30 September 2015 / Revised: 7 December 2015 / Accepted: 10 December 2015 / Published: 21 December 2015
This review discusses the Porter-Whitesides discrepancy in wetting properties of n-alkanethiolate self-assembled monolayers (SAMs). About 25 years ago, Whitesides and coworker failed to observe any odd-even effect in wetting, however, Porter and his coworker did, albeit in select cases. Most previous studies agreed with Whitesides’ results, suggesting the absence of the odd-even effect in hydrophobicity of n-alkanethiolate SAMs. Recent reports have, however, found the odd-even effect in hydrophobicity of n-alkanethiolate SAMs on smooth substrates, indicating that hydrophobicity, and analogous interfacial properties, of n-alkanethiolate SAMs significantly depends on the properties of substrate. Unfortunately, the Whitesides and Porter papers do not report on the quality of the surfaces used. Based on recent work, we inferred that the original discrepancy between Whitesides and Porter can be attributed to the quality of the surface. Odd-even effect of SAMs in charge transport, capacitance, friction, and SAM structure are also discussed in this review to inform the general discussion. The discrepancy between Porter's group and Whitesides’ group could be due to surface roughness, morphology, oxidation, and adventitious contaminants. View Full-Text
Keywords: self-assembled monolayer; odd-even effect; roughness; hydrophobicity self-assembled monolayer; odd-even effect; roughness; hydrophobicity
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Oyola-Reynoso, S.; Thuo, M. The Porter-Whitesides Discrepancy: Revisiting Odd-Even Effects in Wetting Properties of n-Alkanethiolate SAMs. Coatings 2015, 5, 1034-1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5041034

AMA Style

Wang Z, Chen J, Oyola-Reynoso S, Thuo M. The Porter-Whitesides Discrepancy: Revisiting Odd-Even Effects in Wetting Properties of n-Alkanethiolate SAMs. Coatings. 2015; 5(4):1034-1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5041034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhengjia, Jiahao Chen, Stephanie Oyola-Reynoso, and Martin Thuo. 2015. "The Porter-Whitesides Discrepancy: Revisiting Odd-Even Effects in Wetting Properties of n-Alkanethiolate SAMs" Coatings 5, no. 4: 1034-1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings5041034

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop