Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties and Modification Mechanism of Thermosetting Polyurethane-Modified Asphalt
Previous Article in Journal
Durability Analysis of Brick-Faced Clay-Core Walls in Traditional Residential Architecture in Quanzhou, China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Optimization of Multi-Objective Process Parameters and Performance Analysis of High-Speed Laser Cladding of TC4/AISI431 Composite Coatings

Coatings 2025, 15(8), 911; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15080911
by Fumin Hong 1 and Tianlu Wei 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Coatings 2025, 15(8), 911; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15080911
Submission received: 8 June 2025 / Revised: 18 July 2025 / Accepted: 18 July 2025 / Published: 4 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Laser Coatings)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors Please see the attached tab for additional recommendations regarding the manuscript. The core idea of the manuscript is promising, but the presentation and analysis need significant refinement.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The English could be improved to more clearly express the research.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript. Please find all comments in the attached file.

Best regards>

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The sentences are often excessively long, which makes them difficult to understand. It is necessary to rewrite such complex constructions into simpler, clearer structures. Additionally, the grammar must be carefully reviewed. For example, the sentence: “…milling machine milling off the surface of the substrate oxidation layer, and 81 then use alcohol to clean the surface, and blow dry with a hair dryer…” is grammatically incorrect and nearly unintelligible.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Review

Overall, the authors have taken a responsible approach to improving their manuscript by conducting a general revision according to the comments. The current version of the manuscript is now recommended for publication in Coatings journal.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

Please find the comments in the attached PDF file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The sentences in the text are still too long, which complicates readability.

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop