Next Article in Journal
An Exploration of Manufacturing Technology to Refine the Grain Size and Improve the Properties of Welded TA1 Titanium Plates for Cathode Rollers
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Water Content in Pigment-Grade TiO2 Particles Coated with Al2O3 and SiO2, and Their Effect on Polypropylene Photodegradation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Al2O3/ZnO Multilayer Coatings for Improvement in Functional Properties of Surgical Scalpel Blades
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bibliometric Analysis of Coating Protection from 2015 to 2025

by
Yin Hu
1,
Tianyao Hong
1,
Sheng Zhou
1,
Yangrui Wang
2,
Qihang Ye
2,
Shiyu Sheng
2,
Shifang Wang
2,
Chuang He
1,2,*,
Haijie He
2,3,* and
Minjie Xu
2,4,*
1
Wenling Construction Engineering Quality Inspection Co., Ltd., Taizhou 318000, China
2
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, China
3
College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
4
School of Civil Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(6), 686; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15060686
Submission received: 13 May 2025 / Revised: 31 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 6 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Corrosion Behaviors and Protection of Coatings)

Abstract

:
Composite protective coatings are critical for material durability but face challenges like fragmented knowledge and scalability issues. Existing research lacks the systematic integration of nanomaterial properties with macroscale performance and standardized evaluation protocols for hybrid systems. This study uses CiteSpace to analyze 18,363 publications (2015–2025) from Web of Science, visualizing collaborative networks, keyword clusters, and citation bursts. China leads global research output (8508 publications), with the USA and India following, while materials science, chemistry, and physics dominate disciplines. Key themes include nanocomposite coatings (e.g., graphene oxide, MXene), corrosion resistance mechanisms, and sustainable technologies, with citation bursts highlighting nanocomposites and surface functionalization. The study reveals interdisciplinary synergies in 2D nanomaterial-polymer systems, thereby improving barrier properties and enabling stimuli-responsive inhibitor release, yet it identifies gaps in lifecycle sustainability and industrial scalability. By constructing a holistic knowledge framework, this work bridges theory and application, quantifying interdisciplinary linkages and pinpointing frontiers like smart, multifunctional coatings. This study integrates data-driven insights to facilitate cross-sector collaboration. It delivers a strategic framework to tackle global challenges in material durability, sustainability, and practical application.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The corrosion of metallic materials poses a persistent challenge across industries, causing substantial economic losses and compromising structural integrity [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Annual global costs associated with corrosion exceed USD 2.5 trillion, accounting for approximately 3.4% of the global GDP, underscoring the urgency for implementing effective protective strategies [8]. Conventional approaches, primarily relying on organic coatings such as epoxy and polyurethane, mitigate corrosion through physical barriers that isolate substrates from aggressive media. These coatings, however, suffer from inherent limitations, including susceptibility to mechanical damage, chemical degradation, and the formation of defects like pores and cracks during long-term service, which compromise their protective efficacy [9,10,11]. The emergence of nanotechnology has revolutionized anticorrosive coatings by introducing functional nanofillers, such as graphene, MXene, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [12,13]. Two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials (e.g., graphene oxide, GO) enhance barrier properties via the “labyrinth effect”, which creates tortuous diffusion pathways for corrosive species. Meanwhile, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) enable the controlled release of corrosion inhibitors through stimuli-responsive mechanisms, providing active protection [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. These smart coatings integrate multifunctionalities, such as self-healing and adaptive corrosion resistance, addressing critical limitations of traditional systems [22]. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in achieving optimal nanomaterial dispersion, ensuring environmental stability, and balancing cost-effectiveness. Continued research into material design and structural optimization is needed to bridge laboratory innovations and real-world applications.
While nanotechnology-driven smart coatings have demonstrated transformative potential in addressing corrosion challenges, the integration of emerging materials like covalent organic frameworks (COFs) introduces new frontiers and unresolved complexities that demand systematic exploration. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are celebrated for their chemical stability and tunable pore structures. They emerge as promising carriers for sustained inhibitor delivery, especially in harsh environments where MOFs may degrade. Imine-based COFs show superior resistance to acidic and alkaline conditions. They also have high loading capacities for organic inhibitors (e.g., benzotriazole), showcasing prolonged protective efficacy in marine coatings [23,24]. Despite these advancements, critical gaps persist in understanding the long-term durability of hybrid systems, where nanomaterial-polymer interfacial interactions and inhibitor release kinetics remain insufficiently characterized [14,25]. Methodological limitations also hinder progress, such as the lack of standardized protocols for evaluating multiscale synergies between 2D fillers and porous frameworks. While individual studies highlight improved electrochemical impedance or salt spray resistance, systematic comparisons of protective mechanisms—such as the interplay between barrier effects and active inhibition—are scarce [26,26]. Additionally, scalability remains a bottleneck; the industrial synthesis of defect-free MOFs and large-area exfoliated 2D nanosheets often sacrifices structural uniformity, compromising reproducibility and cost-effectiveness. Future research must prioritize integrative approaches that bridge material design, processing scalability, and real-world performance metrics [1,8,23]. This involves developing in situ characterization techniques to monitor nanoscale corrosion dynamics. It also requires fostering interdisciplinary collaborations to translate lab-scale innovations into durable, sustainable coatings for critical infrastructure, including offshore wind turbines and marine vessels. Addressing these challenges will be pivotal to unlocking the full potential of smart nanocomposite coatings in mitigating global corrosion impacts.
In the realm of anticorrosive coatings, scientometrics provides a robust framework with which to dissect the exponential growth of research on nanomaterial-integrated systems, offering data-driven insights into knowledge diffusion and technological frontiers [27,28,29]. Tools like CiteSpace excel in visualizing co-citation networks and keyword bursts, revealing pivotal transitions—such as the shift from early graphene-oxide barrier studies to recent MXene-MOF hybrid systems with dual protective mechanisms. By analyzing betweenness centrality, these methods identify landmark studies that bridge material science and engineering, such as the first reports on the pH-responsive inhibitor release from GO-MOF nanocomposites. However, current scientometric analyses remain fragmented, often isolating subtopics like “graphene dispersion” or “MOF synthesis” without quantifying interdisciplinary synergies. Critical gaps include the lack of systematic mapping between nanomaterial properties (e.g., surface functionalization, aspect ratio) and macroscale performance metrics (e.g., salt-spray resistance, electrochemical impedance) [30,31,32,33]. Additionally, few studies leverage CiteSpace’s temporal trend analysis to trace the evolution of concepts like “self-healing coatings” or “nanocontainers,” limiting understanding of how mechanistic insights translate to practical applications [34,34,35]. CiteSpace’s unique capability to model heterogeneous networks—integrating authors, institutions, and concepts—holds promise for unraveling uncharted territories, such as the interplay between 2D nanosheet orientation and polymer matrix adhesion or the lifecycle impact of COF-based coatings [36,37,38]. Yet, no comprehensive study has applied this tool to map the convergence of sustainable chemistry with smart coating design, particularly in forecasting scalable solutions for marine or aerospace environments. Addressing these limitations requires merging scientometric trends with experimental data, enabling researchers to prioritize high-impact trajectories, such as defect-engineered MXene, for enhanced barrier efficiency or machine-learning-optimized MOF formulations for adaptive corrosion control. Such integrative approaches will not only advance theoretical understanding but will also accelerate the translation of nanocomposite innovations into durable, eco-efficient protective systems.
This review systematically analyzes 18,363 publications (2015–2025) in protective coatings from the Web of Science Core Collection, encompassing research articles and reviews, using CiteSpace. Scientometric methods decode global research landscapes, including collaborative networks among countries/institutions, core journals, highly cited references, keyword co-occurrence, cluster evolution, and emerging frontiers. Key findings identify China, the USA, and India as leading contributors, with research concentrated in interdisciplinary domains of materials science, chemistry, and physics. Thematic shifts from traditional barrier coatings to smart nanocomposites, self-healing systems, and sustainable materials are uncovered, highlighting the pivotal roles of nanomaterials like graphene oxide, MXene, and metal-organic frameworks, alongside methodological advancements in electrochemical characterization and machine-learning-aided design. By integrating fragmented knowledge, this study reveals interdisciplinary hotspots and technical bottlenecks, offering a panoramic view of the field’s knowledge architecture, collaborative patterns, and developmental trajectories. Its significance lies in identifying underexplored frontiers—such as stimuli-responsive coatings and lifecycle sustainability—and providing data-driven guidance for optimizing material design, fostering cross-disciplinary synergies, and establishing standardized testing protocols. These insights address industrial challenges in material durability, bridging fundamental research and engineering applications to drive innovation in protective-coating technologies.

2. Data and Methods

2.1. Data Source and Search Strategy

The Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), a multidisciplinary citation database encompassing high-quality journals across scientific disciplines, was selected to ensure comprehensive and precise retrieval of the literature related to coating protection. This database was chosen for its rigorous peer-review standards and broad disciplinary coverage, which align with the requirements for bibliometric analysis of scholarly output [39,40,41].
A targeted search was executed in May 2025 to capture publications spanning the period 2015–2025. The Boolean query TI = (coating*) AND TS = (protect*) was employed, combining title-restricted keywords (using “coating*” to account for morphological variants such as coatings, coating-related) with topic-expanded terms in the abstract/keyword fields (“protect*” to include protection, protective, protecting). This approach balanced specificity (via title constraints) and inclusivity (via topic expansion) to identify strongly relevant studies. Wildcard operators (*) were used to address grammatical variations, ensuring semantic comprehensiveness.
Article types were restricted to peer-reviewed research articles and English-language reviews to maintain methodological rigor. The initial search yielded 18,377 records (17,593 articles and 784 reviews). Subsequent data curation involved removing duplicates, non-English entries, and non-research document types (e.g., books, patents), resulting in a final dataset of 18,363 publications: 17,579 research articles and 784 reviews. Full metadata—including titles, abstracts, keywords, and reference lists—were exported in a plain-text format to facilitate bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace. This dataset comprehensively covers a decade of research (2015–2025), enabling the systematic exploration of trends, collaborative networks, and emerging frontiers in coating protection.

2.2. Analysis Method

This study utilized CiteSpace (Version 6.1.R4) to perform bibliometric analysis, focusing on the evolutionary trajectory of coating-protection research from 2015 to 2025. Following data import, raw records were filtered to retain only research articles and review papers, ensuring analytical focus on peer-reviewed scholarly outputs. A time-slicing interval of 1 year (2015–2025) was configured, with the keyword set as the node type to map conceptual trends across the temporal span. In CiteSpace, the threshold parameter for burst strength is not fixed and is typically determined by the software’s adaptive algorithms or user-defined settings based on specific datasets, such as setting thresholds for citation frequency or co-occurrence counts across time slices to detect significant changes.
For network pruning, the Pathfinder algorithm was applied to streamline connections while preserving critical links, enhancing network interpretability. Thresholds were set to include the top 10% of high-frequency keywords per time slice, with an upper limit of 100 keywords to balance granularity and analytical clarity, in line with established methodologies [30,31]. A keyword co-occurrence network was constructed via frequency aggregation to identify interdisciplinary clusters and emerging themes. Centrality metrics were employed to highlight pivotal nodes bridging distinct research domains, underscoring their roles in connecting conceptual frameworks. Burst detection algorithms were used to pinpoint abrupt increases in keyword usage, signaling potential paradigm shifts or technological breakthroughs within the field.
Centrality in network analysis quantifies a node’s importance. Betweenness centrality specifically assesses how frequently a node lies on the shortest paths between other nodes. This is analogous to a highway tollbooth: nodes with high betweenness centrality are critical for information flow, as they reside on numerous paths connecting network components. For example, a tollbooth on a major highway (e.g., I-95 between Philadelphia and New York) has higher betweenness centrality than one on a less busy road, as more traffic (or network information) traverses it. In CiteSpace, high-betweenness nodes often represent key inter-cluster connections, aiding the identification of “structural holes” where pivotal ideas or collaborations may arise.
Time-zone visualizations were generated to illustrate the temporal interdependencies among research frontiers, offering a dynamic view of evolutionary trends. Cluster labels were refined through synonym merging to ensure semantic consistency, enhancing interpretive accuracy. Default parameters governed minor network components (e.g., node scaling, link strength), maintaining methodological consistency with prior bibliometric studies. This integrated approach enabled a systematic exploration of research trends, collaborative patterns, and emerging frontiers in coating protection over the decade.

3. Scientometrics Analysis and Visualization

The analyzed corpus comprises 18,363 publications—exclusively research articles and review papers—spanning 1361 journals, contributed by 61,038 authors from 32,821 institutions across 708 countries or regions. This extensive coverage underscores the global and interdisciplinary nature of coating-protection research between 2015 and 2025, reflecting substantial collaboration between academia and industry.
The subsequent sections systematically address: (1) annual publication trends to characterize output dynamics; (2) national and institutional collaboration networks to map geographic and organizational contributions; (3) journal co-occurrence analysis to identify key dissemination platforms; (4) cross-disciplinary domain mapping to reveal interdisciplinary linkages; (5) keyword contribution and clustering analyses to decode conceptual structures; (6) burst detection of emerging research hotspots to pinpoint transformative topics; and (7) co-citation analysis of the seminal literature to trace intellectual foundations. This structured approach integrates quantitative metrics and visual analytics to comprehensively characterize the field’s evolutionary landscape.

3.1. Analysis of Article Output Characteristics

3.1.1. Trend Analysis of Issuance

Figure 1 illustrates the annual publication trends in the field of coating protection from 2015 to 2024, excluding the incomplete data for 2025. Over this decade, the number of publications exhibited a remarkable upward trajectory, growing from 996 in 2015 to a peak of 2757 in 2024, which underscores the increasing global research interest and momentum in this domain.
From 2015 to 2019, the annual publication volume experienced steady acceleration. The number of publications rose from 996 in 2015 to 1669 in 2019, reflecting a period of robust foundational development. This growth was likely fueled by escalating demands for advanced coating-protection technologies in industries such as aerospace, automotive, and manufacturing, prompting intensified research efforts. In 2020, the number of publications reached 1686, showing a minor increment compared to 2019. This slight slowdown might be attributed to transient disruptions in research activities. However, from 2021 to 2024, the field rebounded vigorously. Publications surged from 1957 in 2021 to 2757 in 2024, marking a significant phase of expansion. This later period likely witnessed increased translational research and industrial applications, as accumulated knowledge from earlier years paved the way for practical innovations.
Overall, the trend from 2015 to 2024 highlights two distinct phases: a rapid growth stage (2015–2019) centered on material science and coating formulation advancements, and a subsequent phase of stable, yet robust, expansion (2021–2024) characterized by applied research and real-world validation. This evolution aligns with the typical trajectory of emerging research fields, where initial theoretical explorations transition into broader practical implementations.

3.1.2. Country Analysis

This analysis of the collaborative network among countries/regions in the coating-protection field (as shown in Figure 2) reveals distinct patterns. Node size denotes publication count, while centrality reflects a country’s role in connecting collaboration networks.
As presented in Table 1, People’s R China leads with a publication count of 8502, underscoring its substantial research input and output. The USA (1299), India (1257), and Iran (944) follow, indicating their significant engagement. In terms of centrality, England (0.15) plays a pivotal bridging role, facilitating information and resource exchange. Spain (0.13), France (0.13), and Italy (0.11) also hold key positions, leveraging their strong foundations in related disciplines.
China collaborates widely with nations like the USA and India, promoting international knowledge exchange. The USA actively partners with various countries, capitalizing on its research strengths. However, challenges such as cultural–institutional differences and profit-sharing issues may hinder deeper collaboration. Establishing clearer communication and fair benefit-distribution systems is vital to enhance global cooperation, integrate resources, and advance coating-protection research collectively.

3.1.3. Institution Analysis

Table 2 and Figure 3 delineate the institutional landscape of coatings and materials research, dominated by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (1291 publications, centrality = 0.03) and Northwestern Polytechnical University (NWPU) (387 publications, centrality = 0.06). CAS leads globally, with its Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (282 publications) and Institute of Metal Research (291 publications) specializing in corrosion-resistant coatings and self-healing materials. NWPU distinguishes itself in ultra-high-temperature ceramics (UHTCs), as exemplified by their design of high-entropy environmental barrier coatings for C/SiC composites, aligning with aerospace demands for hypersonic vehicles [42,43].
Institutions with high centrality act as interdisciplinary bridges. The Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) (241 publications, centrality = 0.1) and the United States Department of Energy (DOE) (113 publications, centrality = 0.13) emerge as critical connectors (Figure 3). CNRS coordinates European collaborations in icephobic coatings for aerospace, while the DOE leads in energy-related materials, such as boron nitride-based solid electrolyte interfaces for lithium-metal batteries. Their high centrality scores reflect cross-border partnerships (e.g., CNRS-France/DOE–USA collaborations in atomic layer deposition), showcasing the field’s reliance on international expertise [44,45,46].
Chinese institutions (CAS, NWPU, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences) dominate applied materials innovation, with 68% of the top 10 institutions originating from China (Table 2). For instance, CAS’s Shanghai Institute of Ceramics leads UHTC composite research, while NWPU pioneers micro/nano-reinforced C/C composites for ablation resistance [47,48]. Western institutions, such as the Helmholtz Association (235 publications) and the Russian Academy of Sciences (267 publications), focus on theoretical modeling (e.g., first-principles calculations for thermal-barrier coatings) and nuclear materials, respectively [49,50]. The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB) (305 publications) highlights rising contributions from emerging regions, particularly in nanocomposite coatings for electrochemical corrosion protection [49,51].
The network’s temporal evolution (Figure 3 timeline) reveals shifting priorities: pre-2015 research centered on barrier coatings (e.g., h-BN in epoxy), while post-2020 work emphasizes smart systems (self-healing polymers) and sustainability (e.g., bio-inspired anti-icing coatings). Institutions like the Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology (282 publications) exemplify this shift, integrating layered double hydroxides for active corrosion inhibition. Centrality scores correlate with translational impact: the DOE’s high centrality (0.13) stems from its role in scaling lab discoveries (e.g., TiO2-cobaloxime photocathodes) toward commercial applications [52,53,54].
Despite their dominance, discipline-specific collaborations remain underexplored. For example, the Harbin Institute of Technology (229 publications) excels in mechanical characterization, yet lacks strong ties with bio-inspired materials labs [55,56]. Future efforts should bridge nanomaterials (e.g., CAS’s graphene-oxide research) with machine learning (e.g., Helmholtz’s computational materials design) to accelerate discovery [57,58]. The rising role of China (6/10 top institutions) suggests opportunities for joint initiatives in standardizing testing protocols for extreme environment coatings, addressing global challenges in aerospace and energy [59,60].

3.1.4. Analysis of Cited Journals

The landscape of cited journals in the field of coatings and materials science is dominated by a select group of high-impact publications that serve as pivotal knowledge hubs, as outlined in Table 3 and visualized in Figure 4. These journals exhibit distinct roles in shaping research directions, facilitating interdisciplinary dialogues, and disseminating groundbreaking findings.
Surface & Coatings Technology (cited 11,385 times, centrality = 0.69) stands out as the most influential journal, reflecting its dominance in surface engineering and protective coatings. Its publications, such as reviews on plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings for light metals and antibacterial titanium surface modifications, highlight its focus on industrial applications and translational research. The journal’s high centrality (0.69) underscores its role as a nexus connecting materials science, engineering, and corrosion science, evident in its coverage of both fundamental mechanisms (e.g., particle incorporation in coatings) and applied solutions (e.g., anti-icing coatings for aerospace). Corrosion Science (9673 citations, centrality = 0.29) and Applied Surface Science (9598 citations, centrality = 0.47) rank as key platforms for fundamental studies. Corrosion Science excels in mechanistic research, such as self-healing mechanisms in organic coatings and graphene-oxide-based anticorrosive composites, while Applied Surface Science emphasizes nanomaterial-enabled surface modifications, including amino-functionalized graphene oxide for enhanced barrier properties. Their high citation counts and moderate centrality indicate a broad disciplinary appeal, bridging chemistry, materials science, and electrochemistry [48,61,62,63].
Journals with high centrality act as interdisciplinary connectors. Progress in Organic Coatings (7776 citations, centrality = 0.53) specializes in silicone-based protective materials (e.g., PDMS derivatives for anti-biofouling coatings), linking polymer science with environmental protection. ACS’s Applied Materials & Interfaces (5705 citations, centrality = 0.44) integrates nanotechnology and engineering, showcasing works on photothermal deicing coatings and atomic-layer deposition for stable solid electrolytes, thus fostering connections between materials synthesis and energy applications. In contrast, journals like the Journal of Alloys and Compounds (6598 citations, centrality = 0.06) and Ceramics International (4581 citations, centrality = 0.02) exhibit a specialized focus on high-temperature materials (e.g., ultra-high-temperature ceramics) and ceramic composites, respectively. While their citation counts are substantial, lower centrality scores indicate narrower disciplinary scopes, primarily serving materials science and engineering communities [48,56].
All of the top-cited journals peaked in impact around 2015, reflecting a decade of rapid growth in nanocomposite coatings, self-healing materials, and surface engineering. Surface & Coatings Technology and Corrosion Science led this surge, with seminal reviews on self-healing mechanisms and graphene-based coatings driving subsequent research waves. Regionally, Elsevier journals dominate the list (7/15), highlighting European and North American editorial influence, while Chinese contributions (e.g., the Journal of Materials Science & Technology) are emerging, though with lower centrality, indicating opportunities for increased global collaboration.
Notable gaps include the underrepresentation of journals focusing on sustainable coatings (e.g., bio-based polymers) and computational modeling (e.g., machine learning for coating design). Journals like ACS’s Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (not in the top list) could bridge these areas, while high-centrality journals like Surface & Coatings Technology are poised to integrate emerging trends, such as AI-aided coating design and multi-functional nanocomposites for extreme environments [44,48,56].
In summary, cited journals form a hierarchical network where high-impact titles drive interdisciplinary progress, while specialized publications deepen niche areas. Their roles in disseminating both fundamental and applied research underscore the field’s reliance on robust academic platforms to translate scientific insights into technological innovation.

3.1.5. Subject Analysis

The subject category co-occurrence network, depicted in Figure 5 and quantified in Table 4, reveals a hierarchical structure of disciplinary interactions in coatings and materials research, dominated by Materials Science, Multidisciplinary (6671 counts, centrality = 0.39) as the pivotal hub connecting diverse scientific domains. This analysis underscores the field’s inherently interdisciplinary nature, with key subject categories forming interconnected clusters that drive innovation.
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary (centrality = 0.39) serves as the nucleus, encompassing foundational research on nanocomposite coatings, self-healing mechanisms, and surface engineering (e.g., amino-functionalized graphene oxide in epoxy coatings). Its high centrality reflects strong linkages with Physics, Applied (4108 counts, centrality = 0.04) and Chemistry, Physical (2563 counts, centrality = 0.09), evident in studies combining electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with nanomaterial synthesis. These disciplines collectively advance understanding of coating durability, corrosion mechanisms, and functional material design. Materials Science, Coatings and Films (5122 counts) ranks second in publication volume but exhibits zero centrality, indicating a specialized focus rather than bridging roles. This category specializes in protective coatings (e.g., PDMS-based silicone films for anti-biofouling) and surface modification techniques (e.g., plasma electrolytic oxidation for light metals), catering to industrial and aerospace applications. Its disciplinary isolation highlights the need for stronger integration with adjacent fields like nanotechnology and engineering [64,65,66,67].
Subjects with moderate centrality act as critical connectors. Engineering, Civil (316 counts, centrality = 0.15) and Engineering, Biomedical (127 counts, centrality = 0.14) bridge materials science with practical applications: the former focuses on blast-resistant polyurea coatings for concrete structures, while the latter explores antibacterial titanium surfaces for orthopedic implants. Their roles demonstrate the translation of material innovations into civil infrastructure and medical devices, underscoring demand-driven research. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (897 counts, centrality = 0.13) emerges as an enabler, facilitating nanocomposite development (e.g., superhydrophobic ZIF-8 coatings on Mg alloys) and stealth drug-delivery systems. Its integration with Polymer Science (1091 counts, centrality = 0.09) drives smart coatings responsive to environmental stimuli, such as pH- or temperature-triggered self-healing polymers [68,69,70,71].
European and Chinese institutions dominate Materials Science, Coatings and Films, reflecting strong industrial R&D ecosystems (e.g., CNRS’s work on plasma electrolytic oxidation). In contrast, Engineering, Biomedical is led by North American and European groups, focusing on biocompatible coatings for implantable devices. Temporally, all of the top categories peaked post-2015, coinciding with advances in nanomaterial synthesis (e.g., graphene oxide, hexagonal boron nitride) and computational modeling, which accelerated interdisciplinary collaborations [72,73,74].
Notable gaps include understudied intersections like Sustainability Science and Environmental Engineering, crucial for developing eco-friendly coatings (e.g., bio-based polymers). Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence represent emerging frontiers, yet are absent in the top categories, indicating opportunities for data-driven coating design. Strengthening ties between Materials Science, Biomaterials (240 counts, centrality = 0.11) and Applied Microbiology (64 counts, centrality = 0.11) could address biofilm-related challenges in medical implants, leveraging antibacterial nanocomposites. In summary, the subject landscape is characterized by a core-periphery structure, with materials science as the anchor and engineering/chemistry as key partners. Future progress will depend on fostering deeper interdisciplinary collaborations, particularly in sustainability and digital innovation, to address global challenges in infrastructure protection, energy storage, and biomedical engineering [62,75,76].

3.2. The Key Areas and Hot Issues of Research

3.2.1. Keywords Co-Occurrence Network

The keyword co-occurrence network, visualized in Figure 6 and quantified in Table 5, reveals a dense web of interconnected themes central to coatings research, dominated by behavior (3763 counts, centrality = 0.2), performance (2763 counts, centrality = 0.07), and resistance (2692 counts, centrality = 0.17). These keywords form the core of a hierarchical structure, linking fundamental material properties with applied engineering solutions.
(1)
Corrosion Protection and Resistance
The keywords “corrosion protection” (2197 counts) and “corrosion resistance” (1946 counts) anchor the network, reflecting the field’s primary focus on mitigating metal degradation. Studies frequently link these to nanoparticles (1032 counts), such as graphene oxide and layered double hydroxides (LDH), which enhance barrier properties via mechanisms like improved dispersion in epoxy matrices. The high centrality of behavior (0.2) underscores its role as a bridge between material characterization (e.g., electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, EIS) and functional outcomes, such as hydrolytic-degradation resistance in waterborne coatings [77];
(2)
Material Design and Microstructure
“Microstructure” (2033 counts, centrality = 0.09) and “mechanical property” (1787 counts) cluster with “fabrication” (1138 counts), highlighting efforts to tailor coating architectures for durability. For example, sol-gel processes enable the precise control of silica-nanoparticle-decorated graphene-oxide hybrids, enhancing interfacial adhesion and reducing cathodic delamination. Such designs align with the rising interest in nanocomposite coatings (e.g., polyvinyl butyral/GO composites for aluminum alloys), which merge hydrophobicity and mechanical robustness [78,79,80,81];
(3)
Interdisciplinary Linkages
Terms like “surface” (1290 counts) and “steel” (1219 counts) connect to “mild steel” (956 counts), indicating a focus on industrial substrates. Studies on polyaniline-functionalized graphene coatings for mild steel demonstrate how surface modification boosts corrosion resistance through redox catalytic effects, illustrating the translation of nanoscale design to practical engineering solutions [82,83,84].
The co-occurrence of “performance” with “nanoparticles” and “film” (1582 counts) highlights synergy in developing multifunctional systems, such as superhydrophobic coatings combining polydopamine-modified GO with epoxy matrices for self-healing and anticorrosion dual functionality. These linkages reflect a shift toward integrated solutions addressing multiple challenges (e.g., mechanical wear and chemical degradation) simultaneously;
(4)
Temporal Trends and Emerging Subfields
Post-2015, keywords like “self-healing” and “nanocomposite” gain prominence, aligning with the rise of smart materials. For instance, shape-memory polymers embedded with corrosion inhibitors exhibit adaptive repair under thermal stimuli, showcasing the fusion of material science with responsive engineering. The growing interest in biocompatibility (implied via biomedical coatings) and sustainability (e.g., eco-friendly waterborne formulations) signals emerging frontiers, though these appear as peripheral nodes, indicating room for expansion [85,86].
The network’s core emphasizes empirical characterization (e.g., EIS, SEM) but underrepresents computational modeling (e.g., molecular dynamics simulations for coating design) and machine-learning-driven optimization. Strengthening links between corrosion behavior and data-driven analytics could unlock predictive models for high-temperature or marine environments. Additionally, integrating biological inspiration (e.g., lotus-leaf-inspired superhydrophobic surfaces) with nanomaterials may drive innovations in antifouling and self-cleaning coatings [87].
In summary, the keyword network underscores a field centered on material-performance interplay, with corrosion protection as the nucleus. Future research should leverage interdisciplinary linkages, particularly in sustainable design and computational tools, to address unmet challenges in extreme environments and biomedical applications.

3.2.2. Keyword Cluster Analysis

In co-citation analysis, clustering relies on the frequency of two references being co-cited by the same article. The underlying assumption is that frequently co-cited references are thematically related and belong to the same knowledge domain. In keyword analysis, clustering is based on keyword co-occurrence within documents. Frequently co-occurring keywords indicate shared research themes, enabling the grouping of related keywords into clusters representing distinct research areas. Both methods employ network analysis to identify densely connected subgraphs (clusters), which reflect cohesive research themes or intellectual structures. In co-citation analysis, clustering is based on the frequency of references being co-cited by the same article. The assumption is that frequent co-citation indicates thematic relatedness and membership in the same knowledge domain. In keyword analysis, clustering relies on keyword co-occurrence in documents, where frequent co-occurrence signals share research themes and in which the grouping of related keywords into thematic clusters is enabled. Size refers to the number of nodes (e.g., references or keywords) in a cluster, indicating the cluster’s scale or prominence within the dataset. Silhouette measures cluster quality, with values ranging from −1 to 1. A value close to 1 signifies high intra-cluster similarity and distinctiveness from other clusters. Values near 0 or negative indicate poor clustering validity. Interpretation of silhouette scores should be combined with modularity to ensure reliability.
The keyword clustering map (Figure 7) reveals six distinct thematic clusters, each characterized by cohesive research foci and interdisciplinary linkages, as outlined in Table 5 and supported by citation metrics. These clusters underscore the field’s emphasis on material design, functional performance, and environmental interaction, with corrosion protection, nanocomposites, and surface engineering as overarching themes.
Cluster #0: Epoxy Coating and Nanocomposite Systems
This cluster (size = 46, silhouette = 0.739) centers on epoxy coatings reinforced with nanomaterials, as evident from keywords like “corrosion protection” (2197 counts), “graphene oxide”, and “nanoparticles”. Studies here focus on enhancing barrier properties via functionalized fillers, such as amino-functionalized graphene oxide in solvent-based epoxy matrices, which improve ionic resistance and reduce cathodic delamination. The cluster highlights the critical role of dispersion quality and matrix compatibility, with research demonstrating that 0.1 wt.% graphene-oxide nanosheets significantly enhance corrosion resistance in mild steel substrates. Synergistic effects between nanohybrids (e.g., SiO2-GO) and epoxy matrices are a key focus, showcasing improved mechanical and electrochemical performance.
Cluster #1: Carbon Composite and Microstructural Design
Cluster #1 (size = 45, silhouette = 0.82) revolves around carbon composites and microstructure-property relationships, dominated by keywords like “behavior” (3763 counts), “resistance” (2692 counts), and “microstructure” (2033 counts). Research here spans thermal spray coatings for high-temperature applications, such as plasma-sprayed AlCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys with superior wear resistance at 500 °C. The cluster also includes studies on covalent grafting of graphene oxide to polyurethane matrices, improving both mechanical robustness and corrosion protection through enhanced interfacial interactions. Microstructural analysis via techniques like neutron diffraction and nanoindentation is pivotal, linking phase evolution to functional performance in extreme environments [78,80].
Cluster #2: Magnesium Alloy and Surface Modification
Focused on magnesium alloys and protective coatings, this cluster (size = 29, silhouette = 0.798) features keywords such as “protection” (2284 counts), “corrosion resistance” (1946 counts), and “magnesium alloy”. The studies emphasize surface treatments like the electrophoretic deposition of graphene and layered double hydroxide (LDH) intercalated with 8-hydroxyquinoline, which enhance corrosion resistance through both barrier effects and inhibitor release. Biomimetic approaches, such as superhydrophobic coatings inspired by lotus leaves, are a key subtheme, demonstrating contact angles exceeding 160° and reduced electrolyte infiltration on magnesium substrates [79,81].
Cluster #3: Superhydrophobic Coating and Film Engineering
Cluster #3 (size = 23, silhouette = 0.795) centers on superhydrophobic coatings and film fabrication, with keywords like “films” (1582 counts), “surface” (1290 counts), and “fabrication”. The research here includes pulsed laser-induced triple-layer copper oxide structures for durable anti-icing and self-cleaning properties, as well as nanocomposite films of polyvinyl butyral/graphene oxide for aluminum alloys, achieving three orders of magnitude improvement in the impedance modulus. The cluster highlights the balance between superhydrophobicity and mechanical robustness, with applications in marine and aerospace environments.
Cluster #4: Hybrid Sol-Gel Coating and Electrochemical Characterization
This cluster (size = 22, silhouette = 0.756) focuses on hybrid sol-gel coatings and electrochemical analysis, featuring keywords like “electrochemical impedance spectroscopy” (504 counts), “inhibition”, and “aluminum”. The studies investigate sol-gel-derived silica nanoparticles decorated on graphene oxide for enhanced epoxy coatings, showcasing reduced hydrolytic degradation and improved ionic barrier properties. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a key tool here, used to characterize coating durability in saline environments and validate the efficacy of hybrid systems in mitigating localized corrosion [59,63].
Cluster #5: Mechanical Properties and Tribological Performance
Cluster #5 (size = 18, silhouette = 0.86) emphasizes mechanical properties and tribological behavior, with keywords like “mechanical property” (1787 counts), “wear resistance”, and “thermal stability”. The research includes multilayered TiAlCN/TiAlN coatings synthesized by cathodic arc evaporation, demonstrating improved hardness and reduced friction coefficients, and high-entropy nitride coatings with tailored Al/Ti ratios for enhanced thermal stability and wear resistance. The cluster underscores the importance of microstructural design in optimizing load-bearing and protective capabilities for industrial applications.
All clusters converge on nanocomposite design and stimuli-responsive mechanisms, with graphene oxide, LDH, and polymer matrices as recurring materials. Synergies between “corrosion protection” (Cluster #0) and “superhydrophobicity” (Cluster #3) are evident in self-healing coatings combining shape-memory polymers with corrosion inhibitors, enabling autonomous repair under thermal or light stimuli. Emerging trends include bioinspired designs (e.g., lotus-leaf mimics) and sustainable formulations, such as waterborne epoxy coatings with polydopamine-modified GO, addressing environmental concerns.
While experimental characterization (e.g., EIS, SEM) is robust, computational modeling (e.g., molecular dynamics for coating-substrate interactions) remains underrepresented. Additionally, standardized testing protocols for long-term durability in complex environments (e.g., marine, high-temperature) are needed. Future research could bridge these gaps by integrating machine learning for predictive coating design and exploring multi-scale synergies between nanoscale fillers and macroscale mechanical behavior [62,63].
In summary, the keyword clusters depict a field advancing through material innovation, interdisciplinary methodologies, and application-driven design, with corrosion protection and functional performance as enduring focal points.

3.2.3. Analysis of Keywords with the Strongest Citation Bursts

The analysis of the top 25 keywords with the strongest citation bursts (Table 6, Figure 7) reveals dynamic shifts in research focus over the 2015–2025 period, underscored by technological advancements, material innovation, and evolving application demands. These bursts highlight emerging themes and sustained interests, categorized into three distinct phases: early foundational research (2015–2018), methodological advancements (2018–2021), and next-generation material design (2021–2025).
(1)
Early Foundational Research (2015–2018): Establishing Core Concepts
“Sol-gel coatings” (burst strength = 37.94, 2015–2020) dominated early research, focusing on silica-based hybrid materials for corrosion protection and functional surfaces. Studies emphasized sol-gel-derived PDMS derivatives, leveraging their inorganic–organic hybrid structure to enhance barrier properties and chemical resistance, particularly in marine and high-temperature environments [88,89].
“Metals” (30.31, 2015–2017) and “oxidation protection” (29.91, 2015–2018) reflected intensive investigations into metallic substrates (e.g., magnesium, aluminum alloys) and their protection against high-temperature oxidation. For example, the electrodeposition of Ni-W alloy laminar coatings on mild steel demonstrated enhanced corrosion resistance through microstructural optimization, while HfC nanowire-reinforced coatings improved ablation resistance in C/C composites [90,91].
“Hybrid coatings” (26, 2015–2018) and “conversion coatings” (24.09, 2015–2019) highlighted interdisciplinary efforts, such as graphene oxide/silane multilayers on aluminum alloys, combining barrier effects with self-healing mechanisms via pH-responsive nanovalves [48,92];
(2)
Methodological Advancements (2018–2021): Analytical Tools and Fabrication Techniques
“Electrochemical behavior” (24.82, 2018–2020) and “EIS” (19.43, 2019–2020) emerged as pivotal analytical tools, enabling the precise characterization of coating durability. For instance, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was used to evaluate the long-term performance of epoxy coatings embedded with self-doped polyaniline nanofibers, revealing improved ionic resistance over 120 days of immersion [93,94].
“Electrophoretic deposition” (16.96, 2020–2021) gained traction for its versatility in fabricating uniform, functional coatings, such as antibacterial chitosan-silver nanoparticle layers on porous titanium implants, though in vivo studies highlighted challenges in balancing antimicrobial efficacy and immune compatibility;
(3)
Next-Generation Material Design (2021–2025): Emerging Frontiers
“Polymer” (29.62, 2022–2025) and “epoxy resin” (28.32, 2022–2025) dominated recent bursts, driven by sustainable and high-performance formulations. Bio-based epoxy resins derived from lignin and linseed oil showcased eco-friendly alternatives with comparable corrosion resistance to commercial systems, while shape-memory polymer composites enabled self-healing under thermal or solar stimuli, addressing mechanical damage in extreme environments [95,96].
“Nanosheets” (21.04, 2021–2023) and “protective coating” (23.29, 2022–2025) reflected a shift toward nanoscale engineering, such as graphene oxide nanohybrids for enhanced barrier properties and reduced cathodic delamination in epoxy matrices.
“Robust” (25.26, 2021–2023) underscored the demand for coatings with integrated functionalities, e.g., superhydrophobic–superoleophilic surfaces combining self-cleaning and anti-icing properties, critical for aerospace and marine applications;
(4)
Cross-Phase Trends and Synergies
“Spectroscopy” (23.57, 2015–2018) and “Raman spectroscopy” (14.77, 2016–2017) remained essential for structural characterization, enabling insights into interfacial reactions in coatings like Al2O3 on LiNi0.4Mn0.4Co0.2O2 cathodes, where atomic-layer deposition mitigated electrolyte side reactions at high voltages [48].
“Diffusion” (21.63, 2023–2025) and “system” (15.28, 2023–2025) indicated growing interest in multi-scale modeling, aiming to optimize ion transport and coating–substrate interactions, particularly for advanced energy-storage systems like solid-state lithium-metal batteries;
(5)
Gaps and Future Directions
While early research focused on material synthesis and empirical characterization, recent bursts signal a transition toward sustainability (bio-based polymers, RoHS-compliant additives) and intelligent systems (self-healing, stimuli-responsive release). Gaps remain in standardizing testing protocols for long-term durability in complex environments (e.g., marine, nuclear) and integrating machine learning for predictive coating design. Future efforts could prioritize multi-functional nanocomposites, such as lignin-based epoxy blends with embedded sensors for real-time corrosion monitoring, bridging empirical experimentation with data-driven innovation.
In summary, citation bursts outline a field evolving from foundational material science to application-oriented, intelligent coatings, driven by advancements in nanotechnology, electrochemical analysis, and sustainable chemistry.

3.3. Reference Co-Citation Cluster Analysis

The reference co-citation cluster analysis reveals distinct thematic groupings of highly influential publications, highlighting foundational and emerging research trajectories in protective coatings and corrosion science. Table 7 and the accompanying Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10 illustrate the structural and temporal distribution of these clusters, anchored by key studies that drive knowledge integration across the field.
(1)
Core Clusters and Thematic Focus
Cluster #0: Graphene Oxide Dominance (Size = 100, Silhouette = 0.896)
This cluster, centered on graphene-oxide (GO)-based nanocomposites, is anchored by Ramezanzadeh B. (2016), whose study reports polydopamine-modified GO enhancing water-borne epoxy coatings’ corrosion resistance via improved dispersion and barrier properties. With a mean year of 2017, it highlights the pivotal role of 2D nanomaterials in modern coatings, integrating studies on GO functionalization, electrochemical characterization, and synergistic effects with polymers (e.g., Cui MJ, 2018; Qiu SH, 2017). The high silhouette value (0.896) signals strong internal homogeneity, with research focusing on defect engineering and eco-friendly formulations [47,81,97].
Table 7. The top 7 co-cited pieces of literature in the last 10 years.
Table 7. The top 7 co-cited pieces of literature in the last 10 years.
ID Size CentralityCited Publications
12280.14Ramezanzadeh B, 2016, Corros. Sci., V103, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.033 [98]
22090.04Zhang F, 2018, Corros. Sci., V144, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.005 [48]
31970.05Pourhashem S, 2017, Corros. Sci., V115, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.11.008 [79]
41740.05Cui MJ, 2018, Chem Eng J., V335, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.172 [47]
51410.02Ramezanzadeh B, 2018, Corros. Sci., V137, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.03.038 [98]
6350.15Brusciotti F, 2013, Corros. Sci., V67, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.10.013 [99]
7680.1Wei HG, 2015, J Mater Chem A., V3, P469, DOI 10.1039/c4ta04791e [100]
Cluster #1: Epoxy Coating Innovations (Size = 82, Silhouette = 0.845)
Dominated by recent reviews (e.g., Ghaderi, M. 2024), this cluster emphasizes epoxy-based smart coatings, including self-healing and superhydrophobic systems. Key studies like Qian HC (2017) detail dual-action coatings combining shape-memory polymers and corrosion inhibitors, showcasing advancements in stimulus-responsive materials. The mean year of 2020 reflects a shift toward multifunctional designs, addressing mechanical robustness and environmental durability [15].
Cluster #2: Mesoporous Silica and Hybrid Systems (Size = 60, Silhouette = 0.902)
Focused on mesoporous silica and sol-gel hybrids, this cluster is rooted in Figueira RB’s study (2015), reviewing organic–inorganic coatings for metal protection. Studies here explore nanocontainers for inhibitor release (e.g., Wei HG, 2015) and hierarchical structures for enhanced barrier properties, dating back to 2013. The high centrality (0.15 for Brusciotti F, 2013) underscores its role in bridging material synthesis and corrosion mechanism analysis [101,102,103];
(2)
Emerging Trends and Cross-Disciplinary Synergies
Cluster #4: Ti3C2Tx MXene (Size = 50, Silhouette = 0.872)
Highlighting MXene-based coatings, this cluster (mean year = 2021) includes Ghaderi, M.’s study (2024), discussing 2D MXene’s role in active corrosion protection. Research here focuses on Ti3C2Tx nanosheets as physical barriers and inhibitor carriers, leveraging their high electrical conductivity and layered structure to enhance coating durability (e.g., Yan H, 2019). The cluster’s rising prominence reflects cross-disciplinary synergy between nanomaterial science and electrochemical engineering, addressing challenges in harsh environments like marine and high-temperature settings [15,104,105].
Figure 8. Reference co-citation network.
Figure 8. Reference co-citation network.
Coatings 15 00686 g008
Cluster #5: Magnesium Alloy Protection (Size = 41, Silhouette = 0.907)
Centered on magnesium alloys, this cluster (mean year = 2020) is driven by studies like Wu, J. (2025), which reports robust superhydrophobic coatings via hydrothermal processing and PDMS/TiO2 composites. Research emphasizes bioinspired surface engineering (e.g., lotus-leaf mimics) and self-healing mechanisms to mitigate Mg’s inherent corrosion vulnerability. The cluster’s high silhouette value (0.907) indicates strong focus coherence, with applications spanning aerospace and biomedical implants [2,106,107].
Figure 9. Temporal distribution of core reference clusters in corrosion science.
Figure 9. Temporal distribution of core reference clusters in corrosion science.
Coatings 15 00686 g009
Figure 10. Cluster diagram of the co-cited literature in the last 10 years.
Figure 10. Cluster diagram of the co-cited literature in the last 10 years.
Coatings 15 00686 g010
Cluster #13: Robust Superhydrophobic Mg Alloy (Size = 10, Silhouette = 0.949) (Table 8)
Table 8. Summary of the largest 14 clusters.
Table 8. Summary of the largest 14 clusters.
Cluster-ID Cluster Name (LLR)Size SilhouetteMean (Year)
0graphene oxide (11198.02, 1.0 × 10−41000.8962017
1epoxy coating (1556.62, 1.0 × 10−4820.8452020
2mesoporous silica (1510.18, 1.0 × 10−4600.9022013
4ti3c2tx mxene (1582.1, 1.0 × 10−4500.8722021
5magnesium alloy (7467.95, 1.0 × 10−4410.9072020
6ceramic coating (1199.33, 1.0 × 10−4390.9642013
7graphene oxide (2161.52, 1.0 × 10−4360.8862018
8silicone-epoxy hybrid coating (1344.58, 1.0 × 10−4350.9412013
9sol-gel coating (655.77, 1.0 × 10−4340.9582012
10stainless steel (1098.33, 1.0 × 10−4290.9202013
11retardant coating (1571.03, 1.0 × 10−4280.9392014
12using high-temperature mechanochemistry treatment (311.01, 1.0 × 10−4190.9622012
13robust superhydrophobic mg alloy (299.73, 1.0 × 10−4100.9492023
14waterborne inorganic zinc-rich coating (381.23, 1.0 × 10−450.9932021
A recent emergent cluster (mean year = 2023), this features cutting-edge work on superhydrophobic coatings integrating nanoscale roughness and chemical resistance (e.g., Cheng, J. 2025). Studies here address mechanical stability challenges via hybrid materials (e.g., ZnO-epoxy composites), demonstrating synergies between surface topography and corrosion inhibition. This aligns with industry demands for durable coatings in extreme environments, such as offshore wind and marine infrastructure [42,108];
(3)
Temporal Evolution and Structural Insights
Early Foundations (Pre-2015): Clusters like #9 (sol-gel coatings) and #6 (ceramic coatings) anchor the field’s historical focus on organic–inorganic hybrids and thermal barrier materials, as seen in Figueira RB (2015) and Chen Y (2015). These laid groundwork for modern nanocomposite designs [103,109].
Recent Surge (2018–2025): Dominated by graphene oxide (#0, #7) and epoxy innovations (#1), recent clusters reflect a shift toward smart, stimuli-responsive systems. High-citation works like Ramezanzadeh B (2016) and Zhang F (2018) emphasize functionalization strategies to enhance dispersion and interface adhesion, critical for translating lab discoveries to industrial applications [81,110];
(4)
Methodological and Theoretical Frontiers
High Centrality Nodes: Studies like Wei HG (2015) (centrality = 0.25) and Liu CB (2018) (centrality = 0.24) act as pivotal bridges, integrating advanced characterization techniques (e.g., in situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, SEM-TEM correlative microscopy) to decode nanocomposite degradation mechanisms. These methodologies enable precise quantification of barrier properties and inhibitor-release kinetics, essential for validating theoretical models of coating failure [97,111].
Computational Modeling Synergy: Emerging theoretical work leverages molecular dynamics (MD) and density functional theory (DFT) to simulate graphene–polymer interfacial interactions (e.g., Chen C, 2017), predicting optimal functionalization strategies to minimize defect-driven corrosion. Machine-learning (ML) algorithms also gain traction, optimizing coating formulations by correlating nanomaterial morphology with electrochemical performance, as hinted in Nazari MH (2022)’s review of data-driven design [75,86].
Mechanistic Elucidation: High-citation papers like Ramezanzadeh B (2016) and Cui MJ (2018) emphasize multi-scale analysis, combining surface science (XPS, AFM) with bulk property testing to unravel synergies between nanofiller dispersion and coating durability. This mechanistic clarity is critical for designing next-generation systems, such as pH-responsive nanocontainers for targeted inhibitor release (e.g., Zhou CL, 2020) [81,98,112];
(5)
Gaps and Future Directions
Standardization Challenges: Despite methodological advancements, standardized testing protocols for long-term durability in complex environments (e.g., cyclic thermal shock, multi-ion corrosion) remain lacking, limiting comparability across studies.
Sustainability Imperatives: The field increasingly demands eco-friendly formulations, as seen in Li J (2024)’s work on waterborne inorganic zinc-rich coatings, but lifecycle assessments and biocompatibility evaluations for biomedical applications (e.g., Mg alloy implants) are underdeveloped [98,112,113].
Interdisciplinary Integration: Merging coating science with artificial intelligence (e.g., ML-driven defect detection) and sustainable chemistry (e.g., biomass-derived polymers) presents untapped opportunities, aligning with global trends in green engineering and smart infrastructure [93].
In summary, reference co-citation clusters highlight a field advancing from empirical material synthesis to theoretically informed, multi-functional designs, with foundational studies in graphene oxide and epoxy systems serving as launchpads for emerging frontiers in MXene, superhydrophobicity, and sustainable formulations.

4. Conclusions and Prospects

Using CiteSpace (Version 6.1.R4) software, this study conducted a visualized bibliometric analysis of 18,363 publications in the field of coating protection from the Web of Science Core Collection (2015–2025), unraveling research trends, collaborative networks, and knowledge structures. The analysis integrates annual publication dynamics, journal and subject category distributions, cooperation patterns, co-citation networks, and keyword co-occurrence to provide a holistic overview. Key findings, innovations, limitations, and future directions are summarized as follows:
(1)
Annual publications exhibit a steady upward trajectory, growing from 996 in 2015 to a peak of 2757 in 2024, reflecting escalating global interest in advanced coating technologies. Dominant journals such as Surface & Coatings Technology and Corrosion Science (centrality > 0.29) serve as interdisciplinary hubs, bridging materials science, chemistry, and engineering. Research categories cluster around materials science (multidisciplinary and coatings and films), physics, and polymer science, indicating strong cross-disciplinary engagement;
(2)
Highly co-cited works focus on graphene-oxide functionalization, epoxy nanocomposites, and superhydrophobic surfaces, highlighting foundational contributions to barrier properties and corrosion mechanisms. Clusters centered on magnesium alloys and MXene materials signal emerging frontiers in lightweight and high-temperature applications, though theoretical modeling (e.g., machine learning for coating design) remains underrepresented;
(3)
Core themes centered on “corrosion protection,” “nanoparticles,” and “epoxy coatings” underscore the field’s focus on enhancing barrier properties and mechanical durability for industrial substrates like mild steel and magnesium alloys. Synergistic interactions between keywords such as “graphene oxide,” “layered double hydroxides,” and “sol-gel processes” highlight the dominance of nanomaterial-driven innovations, particularly in improving dispersion and interfacial adhesion in polymer matrices. Emerging trends include “self-healing mechanisms,” “superhydrophobic surfaces,” and “sustainable formulations,” reflecting a shift toward smart, environmentally friendly coatings. For example, shape-memory polymers and pH-responsive nanocontainers demonstrate adaptive repair capabilities, while bio-based epoxy resins address sustainability imperatives. Gaps persist in standardized testing protocols for extreme environments (e.g., marine, nuclear) and computational modeling for predictive coating design. Future research could prioritize integrating machine learning to optimize nanocomposite formulations, exploring multi-scale synergies between atomic-level interactions and macroscale performance, and advancing biocompatible coatings for biomedical implants;
(4)
Potential bias from self-citation in co-citation analysis may overstate certain authors’ influence; reliance on the WOS database might underrepresent regional publications in non-English journals or alternative databases. The focus on the English-language literature limits coverage of non-English contributions, particularly from regions like East Asia, where significant research on magnesium alloy coatings is conducted;
(5)
Future Research Avenues: (1) Methodological Refinement: this should validate findings using multi-database integration (e.g., Scopus, CNKI) and should exclude self-citations to enhance network objectivity; (2) Technological Frontiers: researchers should investigate AI-driven inverse design for coatings, combining machine learning with experimental data to accelerate discovery of high-performance materials; (3) Sustainability Integration: this should prioritize lifecycle analyses for bio-based coatings and develop standardized protocols for assessing long-term durability in complex environments (e.g., cyclic thermal–chemical stress); (4) Cross-Disciplinary Expansion: this should foster collaborations between coating science, biology, and data science to create adaptive systems, such as self-reporting coatings with embedded sensors for real-time corrosion monitoring.
This study underscores the need for iterative, inclusive, and future-oriented research to bridge existing gaps, ensuring that coating-protection technologies evolve in tandem with global demands for durability, sustainability, and smart functionality.

Funding

This work was funded by the ‘Pioneer’ and ‘Leading Goose’ R&D Program of Zhejiang (2023C03135) and the 2024 Construction Research Projects of the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Housing and Urban–Rural Development (No. 2024K061 and No. 2024K062).

Conflicts of Interest

Author Yin Hu, Tianyao Hong, Sheng Zhou, Chuang He were employed by the company Wenling Construction Engineering Quality Inspection Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Xiao, X.; Wang, N.; Meng, G.; Gu, L. Graphene-like Two-Dimensional Nanosheets-Based Anticorrosive Coatings: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 139–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Wang, L. State of the Art and Current Trends on the Metal Corrosion and Protection Strategies in Deep Sea. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 215, 192–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Priyadarshi, R.; Uzun, S.; Rhim, J.W. Edible Coating Using Carbon Quantum Dots for Fresh Produce Preservation: A Review of Safety Perspectives. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2024, 331, 103211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. He, H.; Shi, J.; Yu, S.; Yang, J.; Xu, K.; He, C.; Li, X. Exploring Green and Efficient Zero-Dimensional Carbon-Based Inhibitors for Carbon Steel: From Performance to Mechanism. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, C.; Sun, T.; Wang, X.; He, H.; E, S. Development of High-Dispersion CLDH/Carbon Dot Composites to Boost Chloride Binding of Cement. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2024, 152, 105669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shan, H.; E, S.; Zhao, R.; Miao, Y.; Wang, Z.; He, H.; He, C. Effect of Carbon Dots with Different Sizes on Chloride Binding of Cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 425, 136103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, Z. A Review of Corrosion Inhibitors for Rust Preventative Fluids. Curr. Opin. Solid. State Mater. Sci. 2019, 23, 100759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cui, G.; Bi, Z.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Xing, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, B. A Comprehensive Review on Smart Anti-Corrosive Coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 148, 105821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, H. Beyond Graphene and Boron Nitride: Why MXene Can Be Used in Composite for Corrosion Protection on Metals? Compos. B Eng. 2024, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ding, J.; Zhao, H.; Yu, H. Bioinspired Strategies for Making Superior Graphene Composite Coatings. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435, 134808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yimyai, T.; Crespy, D.; Rohwerder, M. Corrosion-Responsive Self-Healing Coatings. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2300101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xiang, T.; Wang, J.; Liang, Y.; Daoudi, W.; Dong, W.; Li, R.; Chen, X.; Liu, S.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, K. Carbon Dots for Anti-Corrosion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2411456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. S, A.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Kandasubramanian, B.; Kumar B, P. Probing into Atomically Thin Layered Nano-Materials Protective Coating for Aerospace and Strategic Defence Application—A Review. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 968, 172203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ren, S.; Cui, M.; Liu, C.; Wang, L. A Comprehensive Review on Ultrathin, Multi-Functionalized, and Smart Graphene and Graphene-Based Composite Protective Coatings. Corros. Sci. 2023, 212, 110939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghaderi, M.; Bi, H.; Dam-Johansen, K. Advanced Materials for Smart Protective Coatings: Unleashing the Potential of Metal/Covalent Organic Frameworks, 2D Nanomaterials and Carbonaceous Structures. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 323, 103055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Randis, R.; Darmadi, D.B.; Gapsari, F.; Sonief, A.A.A.; Akpan, E.D.; Ebenso, E.E. The Potential of Nanocomposite-Based Coatings for Corrosion Protection of Metals: A Review. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 390, 123067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, W.; Wang, L. 2D Nanomaterials Reinforced Organic Coatings for Marine Corrosion Protection: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Prospectives. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2312460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nine, M.J.; Cole, M.A.; Tran, D.N.H.; Losic, D. Graphene: A Multipurpose Material for Protective Coatings. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2015, 3, 12580–12602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, H.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, C.; He, C. Research Progress of Carbon Dots as Novel Corrosion Inhibitors. J. Mol. Struct. 2025, 1334, 141894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tang, Y.; He, H.; Qiao, H.; Wang, S.; He, C.; Xiang, T. Carbon Dot Aggregates: A New Strategy to Promote Corrosion Inhibition Performance of Carbon Dots. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 33, 1479–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, H.; E, S.; Ai, L.; Wang, X.; Yao, J.; He, C.; Cheng, B. Exploiting Machine Learning for Controlled Synthesis of Carbon Dots-Based Corrosion Inhibitors. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 419, 138210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wei, Z.Y.; Meng, G.H.; Chen, L.; Li, G.R.; Liu, M.J.; Zhang, W.X.; Zhao, L.N.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.D.; Wan, C.L.; et al. Progress in Ceramic Materials and Structure Design toward Advanced Thermal Barrier Coatings. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 985–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Z.; Scharnagl, N.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; Ying, H.; Yang, W. Micro/Nanocontainer-Based Intelligent Coatings: Synthesis, Performance and Applications—A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, Y.; Wu, L.; Yao, W.; Wu, J.; Serdechnova, M.; Blawert, C.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; Yuan, Y.; Xie, Z.; Pan, F. “Smart” Micro/Nano Container-Based Self-Healing Coatings on Magnesium Alloys: A Review. J. Magnes. Alloys 2023, 11, 2230–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Udoh, I.I.; Shi, H.; Daniel, E.F.; Li, J.; Gu, S.; Liu, F.; Han, E.H. Active Anticorrosion and Self-Healing Coatings: A Review with Focus on Multi-Action Smart Coating Strategies. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 116, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fattah-alhosseini, A.; Fardosi, A.; Karbasi, M.; Kaseem, M. Advancements in Enhancing Corrosion Protection of Mg Alloys: A Comprehensive Review on the Synergistic Effects of Combining Inhibitors with PEO Coating. J. Magnes. Alloys 2024, 12, 465–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alvi, I.H.; Li, Q.; Hu, H.; Onyekwena, C.C.; Hou, Y.; Hakuzweyezu, T.; Iftikhar, S.; Chen, B. A Critical Review of the Advancements in Acid-Activated Metakaolin Geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 421, 135609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pei, Z.; Chen, S.; Ding, L.; Liu, J.; Cui, X.; Li, F.; Qiu, F. Current Perspectives and Trend of Nanomedicine in Cancer: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. J. Control. Release 2022, 352, 211–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Geng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Gao, J.; Yan, Y.; Chen, L. Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Tourism Using CiteSpace. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2024, 202, 123310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tan, L.; Wang, X.; Yuan, K.; Yin, T.; Du, R.; Shen, L.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, S.; Zhang, H.; Wang, G. Structural and Temporal Dynamics Analysis on Drug-Eluting Stents: History, Research Hotspots and Emerging Trends. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 23, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, X.; Zhao, S.; Tan, L.; Tan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Hou, C.; Xu, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, G. Frontier and Hot Topics in Electrochemiluminescence Sensing Technology Based on CiteSpace Bibliometric Analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 201, 113932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hou, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, C. Emerging Trends and New Developments in Information Science: A Document Co-Citation Analysis (2009–2016). Scientometrics 2018, 115, 869–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, C.; Dubin, R.; Kim, M.C. Emerging Trends and New Developments in Regenerative Medicine: A Scientometric Update (2000–2014). Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 2014, 14, 1295–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ren, M.; Yu, X.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Yagoub, A.E.G.A.; Chen, L.; Zhou, C. Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Pulsed Light Technology in the Food Field: A Scientometrics Review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 74, 102823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, X.; Tian, S.; Zhao, J.; Wen, Y.; Tang, J.; Yang, Y. Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Nanoindentation Research. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 50894–50909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cui, W.; Cui, Q.; Dong, X.; Liu, J.; Song, K.; Xie, M.; Yao, X. Current Research Status and Emerging Trends in Utilization of Red Mud Resources: A Study Based on Bibliometric Network Analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 442, 137605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hu, K.; Gong, S.; Zhang, Q.; Seng, C.; Xia, M.; Jiang, S. An Overview of Implementing Security and Privacy in Federated Learning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 57, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sabe, M.; Pillinger, T.; Kaiser, S.; Chen, C.; Taipale, H.; Tanskanen, A.; Tiihonen, J.; Leucht, S.; Correll, C.U.; Solmi, M. Half a Century of Research on Antipsychotics and Schizophrenia: A Scientometric Study of Hotspots, Nodes, Bursts, and Trends. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 136, 104608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, L.; Zheng, H.; Jiang, S.T.; Liu, Y.G.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, J.W.; Lu, X.; Zhao, H.T.; Sang, X.T.; Xu, Y.Y. Worldwide Research Trends on Tumor Burden and Immunotherapy: A Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Surg. 2024, 110, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, H.; Sang, X.; Xu, Y.; Lu, X. Evolutionary Patterns and Research Frontiers in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: A Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Surg. 2023, 109, 2774–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tao, H.; Zhuang, S.; Xue, R.; Cao, W.; Tian, J.; Shan, Y. Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 179, 121639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khan, A.; Nguyen, V.H.; Muñoz-Rojas, D.; Aghazadehchors, S.; Jiménez, C.; Nguyen, N.D.; Bellet, D. Stability Enhancement of Silver Nanowire Networks with Conformal ZnO Coatings Deposited by Atmospheric Pressure Spatial Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 19208–19217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, X.; Tepylo, N.; Pommier-Budinger, V.; Budinger, M.; Bonaccurso, E.; Villedieu, P.; Bennani, L. A Survey of Icephobic Coatings and Their Potential Use in a Hybrid Coating/Active Ice Protection System for Aerospace Applications. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2019, 105, 74–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chouirfa, H.; Bouloussa, H.; Migonney, V.; Falentin-Daudré, C. Review of Titanium Surface Modification Techniques and Coatings for Antibacterial Applications. Acta Biomater. 2019, 83, 37–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wise, A.M.; Ban, C.; Weker, J.N.; Misra, S.; Cavanagh, A.S.; Wu, Z.; Li, Z.; Whittingham, M.S.; Xu, K.; George, S.M.; et al. Effect of Al2O3 Coating on Stabilizing LiNi0.4Mn0.4Co0.2O2 Cathodes. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 6146–6154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gu, J.; Yan, Y.; Young, J.L.; Steirer, K.X.; Neale, N.R.; Turner, J.A. Water Reduction by a P-GaInP2 Photoelectrode Stabilized by an Amorphous TiO2 Coating and a Molecular Cobalt Catalyst. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cui, M.; Ren, S.; Zhao, H.; Xue, Q.; Wang, L. Polydopamine Coated Graphene Oxide for Anticorrosive Reinforcement of Water-Borne Epoxy Coating. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, F.; Ju, P.; Pan, M.; Zhang, D.; Huang, Y.; Li, G.; Li, X. Self-Healing Mechanisms in Smart Protective Coatings: A Review. Corros. Sci. 2018, 144, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fayyad, E.M.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Ponnamma, D.; Al-Maadeed, M.A.A. Oleic Acid-Grafted Chitosan/Graphene Oxide Composite Coating for Corrosion Protection of Carbon Steel. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 871–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Elkhoshkhany, N.; Hafnway, A.; Khaled, A. Electrodeposition and Corrosion Behavior of Nano-Structured Ni-WC and Ni-Co-WC Composite Coating. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 1505–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Su, Y.; Qiu, S.; Yang, D.; Liu, S.; Zhao, H.; Wang, L.; Xue, Q. Active Anti-Corrosion of Epoxy Coating by Nitrite Ions Intercalated MgAl LDH. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cheng, Q.; Li, A.; Li, N.; Li, S.; Zangiabadi, A.; Li, T.D.; Huang, W.; Li, A.C.; Jin, T.; Song, Q.; et al. Stabilizing Solid Electrolyte-Anode Interface in Li-Metal Batteries by Boron Nitride-Based Nanocomposite Coating. Joule 2019, 3, 1510–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Qian, Y.; Qi, H.; Li, J.; Sun, J. Mechanically Robust Atomic Oxygen-Resistant Coatings Capable of Autonomously Healing Damage in Low Earth Orbit Space Environment. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1803854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, C.; Xiang, H.; Chen, H.; Sun, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, Y. Advances on Strategies for Searching for next Generation Thermal Barrier Coating Materials. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 833–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dong, Y.; Ren, K.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y. High-Entropy Environmental Barrier Coating for the Ceramic Matrix Composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 2574–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ni, D.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.X.; Zou, J.; Chen, B.; Wu, H.; Li, H.; Dong, S.; Han, J.; et al. Advances in Ultra-High Temperature Ceramics, Composites, and Coatings. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, R.; Liu, S.; Zhou, F. Robust Photothermal Coating Strategy for Efficient Ice Removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 46981–46990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fu, Q.; Zhang, P.; Zhuang, L.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Hou, X.; Riedel, R.; Li, H. Micro/Nano Multiscale Reinforcing Strategies toward Extreme High-Temperature Applications: Take Carbon/Carbon Composites and Their Coatings as the Examples. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 96, 31–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qian, H.; Xu, D.; Du, C.; Zhang, D.; Li, X.; Huang, L.; Deng, L.; Tu, Y.; Mol, J.M.C.; Terryn, H.A. Dual-Action Smart Coatings with a Self-Healing Superhydrophobic Surface and Anti-Corrosion Properties. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2017, 5, 2355–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cui, M.; Ren, S.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, G.; Zhao, H.; Wang, L.; Xue, Q. Anticorrosive Performance of Waterborne Epoxy Coatings Containing Water-Dispersible Hexagonal Boron Nitride (h-BN) Nanosheets. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 397, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lu, X.; Mohedano, M.; Blawert, C.; Matykina, E.; Arrabal, R.; Kainer, K.U.; Zheludkevich, M.L. Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Coatings with Particle Additions—A Review. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 307, 1165–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Eduok, U.; Faye, O.; Szpunar, J. Recent Developments and Applications of Protective Silicone Coatings: A Review of PDMS Functional Materials. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 111, 124–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ramezanzadeh, B.; Niroumandrad, S.; Ahmadi, A.; Mahdavian, M.; Mohamadzadeh Moghadam, M.H. Enhancement of Barrier and Corrosion Protection Performance of an Epoxy Coating through Wet Transfer of Amino Functionalized Graphene Oxide. Corros. Sci. 2016, 103, 283–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fam, S.Y.; Chee, C.F.; Yong, C.Y.; Ho, K.L.; Mariatulqabtiah, A.R.; Tan, W.S. Stealth Coating of Nanoparticles in Drug-Delivery Systems. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yin, X.; Mu, P.; Wang, Q.; Li, J. Superhydrophobic ZIF-8-Based Dual-Layer Coating for Enhanced Corrosion Protection of Mg Alloy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 35453–35463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zang, D.; Zhu, R.; Zhang, W.; Yu, X.; Lin, L.; Guo, X.; Liu, M.; Jiang, L. Corrosion-Resistant Superhydrophobic Coatings on Mg Alloy Surfaces Inspired by Lotus Seedpod. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mu, L.; Gao, Y.; Hu, X. L-Cysteine: A Biocompatible, Breathable and Beneficial Coating for Graphene Oxide. Biomaterials 2015, 52, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cheng, S.; Zhang, D.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Qian, S.; Peng, F. Osteogenesis, Angiogenesis and Immune Response of Mg-Al Layered Double Hydroxide Coating on Pure Mg. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Croes, M.; Bakhshandeh, S.; van Hengel, I.A.J.; Lietaert, K.; van Kessel, K.P.M.; Pouran, B.; van der Wal, B.C.H.; Vogely, H.C.; Van Hecke, W.; Fluit, A.C.; et al. Antibacterial and Immunogenic Behavior of Silver Coatings on Additively Manufactured Porous Titanium. Acta Biomater. 2018, 81, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Cirpici, B.K.; Wang, Y.C.; Rogers, B. Assessment of the Thermal Conductivity of Intumescent Coatings in Fire. Fire Saf. J. 2016, 81, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lucherini, A.; Maluk, C. Intumescent Coatings Used for the Fire-Safe Design of Steel Structures: A Review. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2019, 162, 105712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Iqbal, N.; Sharma, P.K.; Kumar, D.; Roy, P.K. Protective Polyurea Coatings for Enhanced Blast Survivability of Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 175, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, H.; Wu, F.; Lee, J.T.; Nitta, N.; Lin, H.T.; Oschatz, M.; Cho, W.I.; Kaskel, S.; Borodin, O.; Yushin, G. In Situ Formation of Protective Coatings on Sulfur Cathodes in Lithium Batteries with Lifsi-Based Organic Electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1401792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pourhashem, S.; Vaezi, M.R.; Rashidi, A. Investigating the Effect of SiO2-Graphene Oxide Hybrid as Inorganic Nanofiller on Corrosion Protection Properties of Epoxy Coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 311, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Honarvar Nazari, M.; Zhang, Y.; Mahmoodi, A.; Xu, G.; Yu, J.; Wu, J.; Shi, X. Nanocomposite Organic Coatings for Corrosion Protection of Metals: A Review of Recent Advances. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 162, 106573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhao, K.; Wang, C.; Yu, Y.; Yan, M.; Wei, Q.; He, P.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Mai, L. Ultrathin Surface Coating Enables Stabilized Zinc Metal Anode. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Anjum, M.J.; Zhao, J.; Zahedi Asl, V.; Yasin, G.; Wang, W.; Wei, S.; Zhao, Z.; Qamar Khan, W. In-Situ Intercalation of 8-Hydroxyquinoline in Mg-Al LDH Coating to Improve the Corrosion Resistance of AZ31. Corros. Sci. 2019, 157, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhu, G.; Cui, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Dong, M.; Liu, H.; Shao, Q.; Ding, T.; Wu, S.; Guo, Z. Poly (Vinyl Butyral)/Graphene Oxide/Poly (Methylhydrosiloxane) Nanocomposite Coating for Improved Aluminum Alloy Anticorrosion. Polymer 2019, 172, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pourhashem, S.; Vaezi, M.R.; Rashidi, A.; Bagherzadeh, M.R. Exploring Corrosion Protection Properties of Solvent Based Epoxy-Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Coatings on Mild Steel. Corros. Sci. 2017, 115, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ramezanzadeh, B.; Ghasemi, E.; Mahdavian, M.; Changizi, E.; Mohamadzadeh Moghadam, M.H. Covalently-Grafted Graphene Oxide Nanosheets to Improve Barrier and Corrosion Protection Properties of Polyurethane Coatings. Carbon 2015, 93, 555–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ramezanzadeh, B.; Haeri, Z.; Ramezanzadeh, M. A Facile Route of Making Silica Nanoparticles-Covered Graphene Oxide Nanohybrids (SiO2-GO); Fabrication of SiO2-GO/Epoxy Composite Coating with Superior Barrier and Corrosion Protection Performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 303, 511–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhou, A.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Yao, X.; Hu, W.; Zhang, L.; Yu, X.; Li, J.; Li, H. Al2O3 Surface Coating on LiCoO2 through a Facile and Scalable Wet-Chemical Method towards High-Energy Cathode Materials Withstanding High Cutoff Voltages. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2017, 5, 24361–24370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Meghwal, A.; Anupam, A.; Luzin, V.; Schulz, C.; Hall, C.; Murty, B.S.; Kottada, R.S.; Berndt, C.C.; Ang, A.S.M. Multiscale Mechanical Performance and Corrosion Behaviour of Plasma Sprayed AlCoCrFeNi High-Entropy Alloy Coatings. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 854, 157140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Berger, L.M. Application of Hardmetals as Thermal Spray Coatings. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2015, 49, 350–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, Y.; Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Han, Z.; Ren, L. Corrosion Inhibition of Biomimetic Super-Hydrophobic Electrodeposition Coatings on Copper Substrate. Corros. Sci. 2015, 94, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, C.; Qiu, S.; Cui, M.; Qin, S.; Yan, G.; Zhao, H.; Wang, L.; Xue, Q. Achieving High Performance Corrosion and Wear Resistant Epoxy Coatings via Incorporation of Noncovalent Functionalized Graphene. Carbon 2017, 114, 356–366, Erratum in Carbon 2022, 187, 493–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tang, C.; Stueber, M.; Seifert, H.J.; Steinbrueck, M. Protective Coatings on Zirconium-Based Alloys as Accident-Tolerant Fuel (ATF) Claddings. Corros. Rev. 2017, 35, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yan, H.; Li, W.; Li, H.; Fan, X.; Zhu, M. Ti3C2 MXene Nanosheets toward High-Performance Corrosion Inhibitor for Epoxy Coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 135, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pourhashem, S.; Rashidi, A.; Vaezi, M.R.; Bagherzadeh, M.R. Excellent Corrosion Protection Performance of Epoxy Composite Coatings Filled with Amino-Silane Functionalized Graphene Oxide. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 317, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ma, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Huang, Y.; Huang, L.; Wang, P.; Qian, H.; Li, X.; Terryn, H.A.; Mol, J.M.C. Dual-Action Self-Healing Protective Coatings with Photothermal Responsive Corrosion Inhibitor Nanocontainers. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 127118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yao, W.; Liang, W.; Huang, G.; Jiang, B.; Atrens, A.; Pan, F. Superhydrophobic Coatings for Corrosion Protection of Magnesium Alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 52, 100–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhou, C.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Yuan, T.; Chen, B.; Ma, X.; Jiang, D.; Luo, X.; Chen, D.; Liu, Y. Epoxy Composite Coating with Excellent Anticorrosion and Self-Healing Performances Based on Multifunctional Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Derived Nanocontainers. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 385, 123835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, H.; Qiang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, S. 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole-Inbuilt Metal-Organic-Frameworks Modified Graphene Oxide towards Intelligent and Excellent Anti-Corrosion Coating. Corros. Sci. 2021, 191, 109715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Liu, C.; Zhao, H.; Hou, P.; Qian, B.; Wang, X.; Guo, C.; Wang, L. Efficient Graphene/Cyclodextrin-Based Nanocontainer: Synthesis and Host-Guest Inclusion for Self-Healing Anticorrosion Application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 36229–36239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cui, X.; Zhu, G.; Pan, Y.; Shao, Q.; Zhao, C.; Dong, M.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z. Polydimethylsiloxane-Titania Nanocomposite Coating: Fabrication and Corrosion Resistance. Polymer 2018, 138, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ghazi, A.; Ghasemi, E.; Mahdavian, M.; Ramezanzadeh, B.; Rostami, M. The Application of Benzimidazole and Zinc Cations Intercalated Sodium Montmorillonite as Smart Ion Exchange Inhibiting Pigments in the Epoxy Ester Coating. Corros. Sci. 2015, 94, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Qiu, S.; Li, W.; Zheng, W.; Zhao, H.; Wang, L. Synergistic Effect of Polypyrrole-Intercalated Graphene for Enhanced Corrosion Protection of Aqueous Coating in 3.5% Nacl Solution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 34294–34304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ramezanzadeh, B.; Bahlakeh, G.; Ramezanzadeh, M. Polyaniline-Cerium Oxide (PAni-CeO2) Coated Graphene Oxide for Enhancement of Epoxy Coating Corrosion Protection Performance on Mild Steel. Corros. Sci. 2018, 137, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Brusciotti, F.; Snihirova, D.V.; Xue, H.; Montemor, M.F.; Lamaka, S.V.; Ferreira, M.G.S. Hybrid Epoxy-Silane Coatings for Improved Corrosion Protection of Mg Alloy. Corros. Sci. 2013, 67, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wei, H.; Wang, Y.; Guo, J.; Shen, N.Z.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, X.; Yan, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Q.; Shao, L.; et al. Advanced Micro/Nanocapsules for Self-Healing Smart Anticorrosion Coatings. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2015, 3, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Palimi, M.J.; Rostami, M.; Mahdavian, M.; Ramezanzadeh, B. A Study on the Corrosion Inhibition Properties of Silane-Modified Fe2O3 Nanoparticle on Mild Steel and Its Effect on the Anticorrosion Properties of the Polyurethane Coating. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2015, 12, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, J.; Lian, L.; Chen, S.; Lei, B.; Yuan, X.; Feng, Z.; Meng, G.; Jia, L.; Long, Z. Enhancing Cathodic Protection and Barrier Properties of Zinc-Rich Epoxy Coatings with Mesoporous Ti4O7 Additive. Prog. Org. Coat. 2024, 187, 108163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Figueira, R.B.; Silva, C.J.R.; Pereira, E.V. Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Sol–Gel Coatings for Metal Corrosion Protection: A Review of Recent Progress. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2015, 12, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cao, Z.; Wang, H.; Qu, J.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Xia, W. One Step GO/DTES Co-Deposition on Steels: Electro-Induced Fabrication and Characterization of Thickness-Controlled Coatings. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 320, 588–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kunst, S.R.; Cardoso, H.R.P.; Beltrami, L.V.R.; Oliveira, C.T.; Menezes, T.L.; Ferreira, J.Z.; De Fraga Malfatti, C. New Sol-Gel Formulations to Increase the Barrier Effect of a Protective Coating against the Corrosion and Wear of Galvanized Steel. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ye, K.; Bi, Z.; Cui, G.; Zhang, B.; Li, Z. External Self-Healing Coatings in Anticorrosion Applications: A Review. Corrosion 2020, 76, 279–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zhao, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Chen, M.; Mao, J.; He, H.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, N.; Wan, G. A Dual-Task Design of Corrosion-Controlling and Osteo-Compatible Hexamethylenediaminetetrakis- (Methylene Phosphonic Acid) (HDTMPA) Coating on Magnesium for Biodegradable Bone Implants Application. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103, 1640–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Chen, Y.; Zhao, S.; Chen, M.; Zhang, W.; Mao, J.; Zhao, Y.; Maitz, M.F.; Huang, N.; Wan, G. Sandwiched Polydopamine (PDA) Layer for Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Coating on Magnesium to Enhance Corrosion Protection. Corros. Sci. 2015, 96, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.X.; Wang, T.; Wang, D.; Wang, C.; Zha, M.; Wang, H.Y. Recent Progress in Self-Repairing Coatings for Corrosion Protection on Magnesium Alloys and Perspective of Porous Solids as Novel Carrier and Barrier. J. Magnes. Alloys 2023, 11, 3585–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ding, R.; Chen, S.; Lv, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, X.D.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Gui, T.J.; Li, B.J.; Tang, Y.X.; et al. Study on Graphene Modified Organic Anti-Corrosion Coatings: A Comprehensive Review. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 806, 611–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ding, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, T.; Fu, J. Self-Healing, Superhydrophobic Coating Based on Mechanized Silica Nanoparticles for Reliable Protection of Magnesium Alloys. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2016, 4, 8041–8052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cui, G.; Bi, Z.; Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Yu, X.; Li, Z. A Comprehensive Review on Graphene-Based Anti-Corrosive Coatings. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 373, 104–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Montemor, M.F. Functional and Smart Coatings for Corrosion Protection: A Review of Recent Advances. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2014, 258, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Annual publication trends from 2015 to 2024.
Figure 1. Annual publication trends from 2015 to 2024.
Coatings 15 00686 g001
Figure 2. Distribution and cooperation of papers from diverse countries.
Figure 2. Distribution and cooperation of papers from diverse countries.
Coatings 15 00686 g002
Figure 3. Distribution and cooperation of papers published by research institutions.
Figure 3. Distribution and cooperation of papers published by research institutions.
Coatings 15 00686 g003
Figure 4. Distribution and cooperation of cited journals.
Figure 4. Distribution and cooperation of cited journals.
Coatings 15 00686 g004
Figure 5. A network of subject category co-occurrence.
Figure 5. A network of subject category co-occurrence.
Coatings 15 00686 g005
Figure 6. Keyword co-occurrence map.
Figure 6. Keyword co-occurrence map.
Coatings 15 00686 g006
Figure 7. Keyword clustering map.
Figure 7. Keyword clustering map.
Coatings 15 00686 g007
Table 1. Statistics on the number of important publications and cooperation from diverse countries.
Table 1. Statistics on the number of important publications and cooperation from diverse countries.
CountriesCountCentrality
People’s R China85020.02
USA12990.07
India12570.03
Iran9440.03
Germany8980.08
Italy5940.11
Russia5840.05
South Korea5650.07
Poland5060.03
Spain4610.13
Canada4430.04
England4390.15
France4220.13
Brazil4040.02
South Africa560.1
Table 2. Statistics on the number of papers and cooperation of important research institutions.
Table 2. Statistics on the number of papers and cooperation of important research institutions.
InstitutionsCountCentrality
Chinese Academy of Sciences12910.03
Northwestern Polytechnical University3870.06
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences3590.02
Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB)3050.03
Institute of Metal Research2910.02
Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering2820.03
Russian Academy of Sciences2670.07
Northeastern University—China2530.02
Tianjin University2480.04
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)2410.1
Helmholtz Association2350.08
Harbin Institute of Technology2290.06
United States Department of Energy (DOE)1130.13
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)2410.1
Table 3. Top 15 most co-cited journals.
Table 3. Top 15 most co-cited journals.
Journal TitleTimes CitedCentralityBegin Year
Surface & Coatings Technology113850.692015
Corrosion Science96730.292015
Applied Surface Science95980.472015
Progress in Organic Coatings77760.532015
Journal of Alloys and Compounds65980.062015
Electrochimica Acta58230.262015
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces57050.442015
Ceramics International45810.022015
Chemical Engineering Journal42930.122016
RSC Advances42330.042015
Journal of the Electrochemical Society377802015
Thin Solid Films35580.072015
Journal of Materials Science & Technology355602015
Materials & Design354402015
Acta Biomaterialia10470.122015
Table 4. Subject analysis.
Table 4. Subject analysis.
Subject CategoriesCountCentrality
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary66710.39
Materials Science, Coatings and Films51220
Physics, Applied41080.04
Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering29090
Chemistry, Physical25630.09
Chemistry, Applied19240.08
Physics, Condensed Matter13580.02
Chemistry, Multidisciplinary12520.09
Polymer science10910.09
Materials science, Ceramics9670
Engineering, Civil3160.15
Engineering, Biomedical1270.14
Nanoscience and nanotechnology8970.13
Materials science, Biomaterials2400.11
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology640.11
Table 5. Keyword times sorting.
Table 5. Keyword times sorting.
KeywordCountCentrality
behavior37630.2
performance27670.07
resistance26920.17
protection22840.05
corrosion protection21970.09
microstructure20330.09
corrosion resistance19460.09
mechanical property17870.07
films15820.08
surface12900.03
steel12190.01
fabrication11380.07
nanoparticles10320.06
mild steel9560.06
corrosion8110.01
Table 6. Top 25 keywords with the strongest citation bursts.
Table 6. Top 25 keywords with the strongest citation bursts.
KeywordsYearStrengthBeginEnd2015–2025
sol gel coatings201537.9420152020▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂
metals201530.3120152017▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
oxidation protection201529.9120152018▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂
hybrid coatings20152620152018▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂
conversion coatings201524.0920152019▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂
spectroscopy201523.5720152018▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂
chromate201522.5820152016▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
galvanized steel201522.5820152016▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
c/c composites201518.7820152019▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂
hydroxyapatite201515.0520152016▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
systems201626.8520162018▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂
in vitro201625.9620162019▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂
aluminum alloys201615.3420162017▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
raman spectroscopy201614.7720162017▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
electrochemical behavior201524.8220182020▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂
EIS201519.4320192020▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂
electrophoretic deposition201616.9620202021▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂
robust202125.2620212023▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
nanosheets201921.0420212023▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
polymer202229.6220222025▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃
epoxy resin202228.3220222025▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃
protective coating201723.2920222025▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃
magnetron sputtering201518.4420222023▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂
diffusion201521.6320232025▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
system201515.2820232025▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, Y.; Hong, T.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Sheng, S.; Wang, S.; He, C.; He, H.; Xu, M. Bibliometric Analysis of Coating Protection from 2015 to 2025. Coatings 2025, 15, 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15060686

AMA Style

Hu Y, Hong T, Zhou S, Wang Y, Ye Q, Sheng S, Wang S, He C, He H, Xu M. Bibliometric Analysis of Coating Protection from 2015 to 2025. Coatings. 2025; 15(6):686. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15060686

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Yin, Tianyao Hong, Sheng Zhou, Yangrui Wang, Qihang Ye, Shiyu Sheng, Shifang Wang, Chuang He, Haijie He, and Minjie Xu. 2025. "Bibliometric Analysis of Coating Protection from 2015 to 2025" Coatings 15, no. 6: 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15060686

APA Style

Hu, Y., Hong, T., Zhou, S., Wang, Y., Ye, Q., Sheng, S., Wang, S., He, C., He, H., & Xu, M. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of Coating Protection from 2015 to 2025. Coatings, 15(6), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15060686

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop