Next Article in Journal
Modification Mechanism and Performance of High-Content Polyurethane-Modified Asphalt
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of Al7075 Localized Corrosion Inhibition by a SiO2 Superhydrophobic Coating Employing an Electrochemical Noise Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Bone–Implant Interface: Effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade in Hypertensive Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Corrosion Inhibition Effect of Mg-Al-pAB-LDH Coating for Steel in the Marine Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

One-Step In Situ Electrochemical Synthesis of Polyaniline/CeO2 Composite Coating for Enhanced Corrosion Protection of Mild Steel

1
School of Materials and Energy, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
2
Department of Chemical Engineering and Safety, Shandong University of Aeronautics, Binzhou 256600, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Special Surface Protection Materials and Application Technology, China Academy of Machinery Wuhan Research Institute of Materials Protection Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2025, 15(1), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010074
Submission received: 25 December 2024 / Revised: 8 January 2025 / Accepted: 11 January 2025 / Published: 12 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Anticorrosion Coatings and Coating Testing)

Abstract

:
The electrolytic composition significantly influences the structure and corrosion protection performance of polyaniline (PANI) coating. In the present work, oxalic acid and benzoic acid were employed to electropolymerize PANI coating on a mild steel substrate using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) technique. Then, cerium nitrate was introduced into the benzoic acid medium to electrochemically synthesize a PANI/CeO2 composite coating in situ. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electrochemical measurements were used to characterize the coating structure and corrosion resistance. The results suggested that the PANI coating prepared from benzoic acid electrolyte possessed a neater structure and better anti-corrosive properties. The co-deposition of CeO2 further increased the thickness and improved the compactness of the PANI coating. The synthesized PANI/CeO2 composite coating possessed the smallest corrosion current density and the largest inhibition efficiency of 98.2%. The charge transfer resistance and coating resistance also increased significantly after the implantation of CeO2 in the PANI coating. The enhanced corrosion protection performance of the PANI/CeO2 hybrid was also elucidated.

1. Introduction

Due to their good physical blocking effect and inhibition performance, conducting polymers have been widely applied for the corrosion protection of various metal materials [1,2,3,4,5]. It is generally believed that a conducting polymer coating slows down the corrosion rate by shifting the open circuit potential to the passive region. Polyaniline, a typical conducting polymer, has been electropolymerized in multiple electrolytes, such as oxalic acid [6,7], metanilic acid [8], sulfuric acid [9,10], phosphoric acid [11], and so on. The composition of the electropolymerization electrolyte plays an important role in the PANI coating structure and corrosion resistance [12]. Pawar [13] electrochemically synthesized an anti-corrosive polyaniline coating on mild steel from the salicylate electrolyte. The prepared PANI coating was uniform, and the corrosion rate was considerably reduced. Ganash [14] electrodeposited polyaniline films from two acidic media and found that the growth rate and thickness of the PANI coating from sulphuric acid were much larger than that of phosphoric acid. Disappointingly, pure PANI coatings are not perfect alternatives for traditional chromatation and phosphatization coatings due to the weak adhesion and insufficient anti-corrosion capability since electrochemically synthesized PANI coating is apt to produce cracks and results in a loose structure [15]. To overcome these shortcomings, it is necessary to optimize the electropolymerization condition and further modify PANI coatings to improve their corrosion protection property.
The implantation of metal oxides in the PANI coating is one of the most effective strategies to enhance corrosion resistance [16,17,18]. Till now, various materials, including TiO2 [19,20], CuO [21], Nb2O5 [22], CeO2 [23], V2O5 [24], etc., have been explored. Among them, CeO2 attracted the greatest attention due to its good cathodic inhibition effect and low toxicity [25,26]. Sasikumar [17] chemically prepared a PANI/CeO2 nanocomposite, which acted as a mixed-type inhibitor for mild steel in HCl solution. PANI/CeO2 nanocomposite has also been fabricated by Shetty [27] by the in situ polymerization of aniline and CeO2 nanoparticles, which was applied to prevent the corrosion of 316 steel in HCl solution. However, the preparation of polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating by an in situ co-electrodeposition from aniline and cerium nitrate electrolyte has rarely been reported, and the detailed investigation of its corrosion protection performance is still sparse.
In this paper, oxalic acid and benzoic acid were employed as two different electrolytes to electropolymerize PANI coating on a mild steel substrate using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) technique. The influence of electropolymerization electrolyte composition on the PANI structure and corrosion resistance was studied. After that, cerium nitrate was directly introduced into the benzoic acid electrolyte to electrochemically synthesize a PANI/CeO2 composite coating in situ. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electrochemical measurements were used to characterize the coating structure and anti-corrosion property. The improved corrosion protection performance of the PANI/CeO2 hybrid was also elucidated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Commercial grade mild steel, obtained from Shengtak New Materials Co. Ltd. (China), was cut into pieces with dimensions of 1 cm × 1 cm × 0.2 cm, and the chemical composition is shown in Table 1. Analytical grade aniline (purity > 99.5%) and anhydrous ethanol were bought from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co. Ltd (Shang Hai, China). Analytical grade benzoic acid (purity > 99.5%), cerium nitrate (purity > 99.5%) and ammonium acetate (purity > 99.0%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd (Shang Hai, China). Before electropolymerization, the mild steel pieces were sealed with epoxy resin and only one 1 cm × 1 cm face was exposed. Then, the exposed face was abraded with different grades of silicon carbide (SiC) paper. At last, the polished face was cleaned in acetone and ethanol for 15 min and dried with pure N2.

2.2. Electropolymerization of Polyaniline and Polyaniline@CeO2 Coatings

Traditional three-electrode systems were applied to fabricate polyaniline and polyaniline@CeO2 coatings. Polished mild steel species served as the working electrode, whereas a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and a large platinum sheet served as the reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. Prior to electrochemical synthesis, mild steel species were immersed in electrolytes of open circuit potential for 30 min to ensure a steady-state condition. Three different electrolytes, as shown in Table 2, were explored to fabricate polyaniline and polyaniline@CeO2 coatings. Samples 1 and 2 were prepared to investigate the influence of electrolyte composition on the polyaniline structure and corrosion protection property. Samples 2 and 3 were compared to study the impact of co-deposited CeO2 on the structural and anti-corrosive performance of the composite coating. The electropolymerization was conducted by using a commercial CHI660A electrochemical workstation with the cyclic voltammetry (CV) (Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Company, China) technique between −0.5 and 1.6 V (vs. SCE) at a scan rate of 20 mV/s. After that, the working electrodes were washed with double-distilled water several times and subsequently dried at 50 °C for 2 h. The polyaniline and polyaniline@CeO2 coatings in the following measurements were all prepared with 10 cycle numbers without otherwise specified.

2.3. Structure Characterization

The thicknesses of the electropolymerized polyaniline and polyaniline@CeO2 coatings were measured using a Dektak 150 profilometer. The polyaniline from oxalic acid, benzoic acid and polyaniline@CeO2 coatings possessed thicknesses of 28.6 ± 2.3 μm, 22 ± 1.9 μm and 34 ± 2.8 μm, respectively. The surface morphology of different coatings was characterized using a Hitachi SU-8010 scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The element composition of fabricated polyaniline@CeO2 coating was detected using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). ESCALAB250 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was applied to investigate the chemical composition of the prepared polyaniline@CeO2 coating.

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

The corrosion protection performance of constructed polyaniline and polyaniline@CeO2 coatings on mild steel substrate were studied in a 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution using potentiodynamic polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Prior to electrochemical tests, the coated and uncoated electrodes were immersed in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution for 30 min to achieve a steady-state condition at the open circuit potential (Eocp). Potentiodynamic polarization curves were recorded in the potential range from Eocp −250 mV to Eocp +250 mV with a scanning rate of 0.1 mV/s. Some informative electrochemical parameters were obtained from the extrapolation of Tafel curves. The inhibition efficiency ( I E % ) was calculated as follows [28]:
I E = 1 j c o r r c j c o r r b a r e
where j c o r r c and j c o r r b a r e correspond to the corrosion current densities of the coated samples and bare mild steel sample, respectively. EIS data were measured in the frequency range from 105 kHz to 10−2 Hz with an AC amplitude of 20 mV. Z-view software (Z-view 3.1 software) was employed to fit the EIS result. The polarization resistance was derived from the following equation [29],
R P = R c + R c t
where R c and R c t are the surface coating resistance and charge transfer resistance, respectively. Then, the following equation served to calculate the corrosion protection efficiency (PE%),
P E % = R p c + R p b R p c
where R p c and R p b are the polarization resistances of coated and uncoated mild steel samples, respectively. Three parallel tests were replicated for each condition to guarantee reproducibility.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the cyclic voltammograms of mild steel in three different electropolymerization electrolytes. In the case of oxalic acid medium, during the anodic polarization process, the current density increases at approximately 0.22 V, which indicates the initial oxidation of the aniline monomer. Increasing the anodic deposition potential, the aniline oligomers are coupled with each other to form aniline cation radicals. A large anodic peak located at around 0.82 V can be observed, which may be related to the generation of a long-chain polyaniline polymer. It is worth noting that the appearance of a large, broad peak in the CV graph generally means a diffusion-controlled reaction, which will produce a relatively loose structure of deposits [30]. During the cathodic polarization scan, the oxidized form of polyaniline will turn into the reduced form of leucoemeraldine at around −0.03 V [31,32]. Meanwhile, by increasing the cycle numbers, the anodic current density increases while the cathodic current density decreases, suggesting the formation of a thicker polyaniline coating. Whereas, in the benzoic acid electrolyte, a rapid increase in anodic current density appears at about 0.78 V. Noticeably, the large, broad anodic peak at 0.82 V disappeared, and no cathodic peak can be detected during the cathodic sweep, which verifies the electrochemical-controlled process of electropolymerization of aniline from the benzoic acid electrolyte. Moreover, a lower anodic current density is obtained in the benzoic acid solution compared to that of the oxalic acid electrolyte at the same cycle number, which agrees well with the measured coating thickness. The above results infer that the benzoic acid electrolyte supplies improved coating structure and better stability [7].
As shown in Figure 1c, the characters of this CV plots of mild steel in the electropolymerization electrolyte containing aniline, benzoic acid and cerium nitrate are similar to that of the electrolyte without cerium nitrate. The significant difference between these two electrolytes lies in the larger current density in the electrolyte containing cerium nitrate than in the absence. The anodic oxidation current density increased from about 3 mA/cm2 to 12 mA/cm2 after introducing cerium nitrate, which demonstrated that the added cerium nitrate possibly facilitated the electropolymerization rate of aniline and may produce a thicker and more compact coating. Meanwhile, the cerium ions can be transferred to cerium oxide to form a polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating through the following mechanism [33,34]:
C e 3 + + 2 H 2 O C e ( O H ) 2 2 + + 2 H + + e
C e ( O H ) 2 2 + C e O 2 + 2 H +
The surface morphology of prepared polyaniline coatings from oxalic acid and benzoic acid electrolytes and polyaniline/CeO2 coating are presented in Figure 2a–c, respectively. In the case of the oxalic acid medium, the synthesized polyaniline coating exhibits some pores and aggregates over the surface. The high magnification SEM image reveals a filamentary structure that makes the polyaniline coating loose and porous, which was in accordance with the CV result. When electropolymerized in the benzoic acid, the coating surface looks more compact. The high magnification graph suggests the whole mild steel substrate was covered by the prepared polyaniline coating. Consequently, the dense structure of electropolymerized polyaniline from the benzoic acid electrolyte will cause a better corrosion protection property. Moreover, the whole mild steel surface was covered by a compact polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating without any visible holes (Figure 2c). The high-magnification SEM picture also reveals a perfect film on the mild steel substrate. As expected, C, N and Ce elements were all present according to the EDX result (Figure 2d), which indicates the successful doping of cerium in the polyaniline coating.
Figure 3 depicts the XPS result of prepared polyaniline/CeO2 coating on a mild steel substrate to analyze the chemical composition. The elements of C, N, O and Ce are present. The N element can be divided into three main peaks, located at around 398.3 eV, 399.5 eV and 401.2 eV, which were ascribed to the imine (=N=), amine (-NH-) and protonated amine (-NH+) structures, respectively [35,36]. The high resolution of the Ce 3d spectrum includes eight characteristic peaks [37]. The peaks labeled U1, U2, U3 and U4 are assigned to Ce 3d3/2, whereas the remainder are related to Ce 3d5/2 [38,39]. Additionally, the typical peaks signed by V2 and U2 were associated with Ce3+, and the other peaks were attributed to Ce4+ [40]. The XPS result suggested the successful modification of the polyaniline coating with CeO2 and the coexistence of Ce3+ and Ce4+ in this composite coating.
The potentiodynamic polarization curves of bare mild steel prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution are shown in Figure 4. It is obvious that both the cathodic and anodic current densities decreased when coated with electropolymerized polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings, which demonstrates that both the anodic dissolution process ( F e 2 e = F e 2 + ) and cathodic reaction rate ( O 2 + 4 e + 2 H 2 O = 4 O H ) were significantly inhibited for the coated samples. Additionally, the corrosion potential of polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2-coated samples moved in a positive direction compared to the bare mild steel sample, which indicated that the prepared coatings acted as an anodic-type inhibitor [41]. The obtained values of electrochemical parameters and IE% are listed in Table 3. Obviously, the corrosion potential (Ecorr.) followed the order of polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating (−0.543 V) > polyaniline (benzoic acid) (−0.675 V) > polyaniline (oxalic acid) (−0.836 V) > bare mild steel substrate (−0.923 V). The fabricated polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating possessed the largest positive shift of 380 mV, suggesting the most chemical stability [42], which confirmed a synergistic passivation effect of conducting polyaniline coating and introduced CeO2. It is notable that the polyaniline coating from the benzoic acid medium exhibited a smaller value of jcorr. And a larger value of IE% than that from oxalic acid. The better corrosion protection performance may be related to the more compact structure, which will consequently produce a better physical shielding of polyaniline coating from the benzoic acid electrolyte. Meanwhile, the synthesized polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating had the largest inhibition efficiency of 98.2%, which indicated the slowest corrosion rate of mild steel after being coated with polyaniline/CeO2 hybrid.
Figure 5 depicts the Bode and Nyquist plots of bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. It is interesting that the fabricated polyaniline from benzoic acid electrolyte and polyaniline/CeO2 hybrid coatings present significant influence on the EIS plots, while no obvious changes can be observed for the polyaniline coating from oxalic acid solution. Both the impedance and arc diameters considerably increased for the prepared polyaniline coating from the benzoic acid electrolyte and polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating, revealing good anti-corrosion properties of these two coatings coated with mild steel samples in chloride-containing solution [43]. Generally, the impedance modulus at a typical low frequency (Z0.01 Hz) can be employed as a qualitative criterion to evaluate the corrosion protection ability of a coating [44]. In the present work, the Z0.01Hz of the fabricated polyaniline/CeO2-coated mild steel presented a larger value than that of the prepared polyaniline-coated samples from both oxalic acid and benzoic acid medium and over 20 times higher than that of the bare mild steel substrate, which suggests the best anti-corrosion performance of polyaniline/CeO2 among these synthesized coatings [45]. The equivalent electric circuits, as shown in Figure 5c, were applied to analyze the experimental EIS data [46]. The equivalent electric circuit with one time constant was used to fit the EIS plot of bare mild steel, whereas two time constants were employed to analyze the EIS plots of electropolymerized polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 hybrid coatings. In the equivalent electric circuits, Rs, Rc and Rct represent the solution resistance, coating resistance and charge transfer resistance, respectively. CPEdl and CPEc correspond to a double-layer capacitance and coating capacitance, respectively. The obtained values of EIS parameters are summarized in Table 4. The value of Rct for prepared polyaniline from the oxalic acid electrolyte increased slightly in comparison with the bare carbon steel sample, and the value of Rc was small. However, for the electropolymerized polyaniline from benzoic acid, the value of Rct was enlarged over one order of magnitude compared to the bare mild steel, and Rc also showed a large value. Zhang [47] synthesized a polyaniline coating on the copper substrate from the sodium oxalate electrolyte. EIS results suggested that the impedance diagram of the copper electrode covered by the fabricated polyaniline film was similar to that of the uncoated sample, and the prepared polyaniline coating exhibited no corrosion protection capability. This phenomenon has also been reported by other researchers [48,49]. Notably, the synthesized polyaniline/CeO2 coating exhibited the largest Rp and PE% values, which agreed well with the results of potentiodynamic polarization curves. The improved corrosion protection performance of the prepared polyaniline/CeO2 coating may be correlated with the following factors. Firstly, the introduced CeO2 promotes the oxidation process to fabricate a dense polyaniline coating. Secondly, the implanted CeO2 nanoparticles act as an inorganic filler in the polyaniline/CeO2 hybrid coating (Figure 2c), which presents excellent physical barrier effects and efficiently inhibits the penetration of chloride ions to the mild steel substrate. Moreover, the presence of Ce3+ in the composite coating will convert to a stable cerium oxide coating through the following mechanism [50], which subsequently blocks the penetration paths and suppresses the propagation of corrosion.
4 C e 3 + + O 2 + 2 H 2 O + 4 O H 4 C e ( O H ) 2 2 +
C e ( O H ) 2 2 + + 2 O H C e O 2 + 2 H 2 O
In comparison with previous works, the polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating prepared through the electrolyte containing benzoic acid and cerium nitrate in the present study exhibited excellent anti-corrosion properties (Table 5), which implied significant prospects for industrial applications.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, PANI coatings were electropolymerized on a mild steel substrate using oxalic acid and benzoic acid as two different electrolytes. The coating structure and corrosion resistance are significantly influenced by the electrolyte composition. The PANI coating that was electropolymerized in benzoic acid exhibited a compact structure, while a porous and loose morphology was observed for the oxalic acid electrolyte. Potentiodynamic polarization curves revealed a more noble corrosion potential and lower corrosion current density for the benzoic acid than the oxalic acid electrolyte. EIS results further confirmed a better corrosion protection performance of electropolymerized PANI coating in the benzoic acid electrolyte. In addition, the introduction of cerium nitrate in the benzoic acid electrolyte increased the polymerization reaction rate and consequently produced a denser polyaniline/CeO2 composite coating. This co-electrodeposited polyaniline/CeO2 hybrid significantly enhanced the corrosion resistance of mild steel in NaCl solution, which is significantly promising to be scaled up for practical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C.; Investigation, Formal analysis, H.Z.; Data Curation, X.D.; Validation, Z.Y.; Funding acquisition, X.D. and Y.C.; Writing-review and editing, Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Open Fund Projects (No. CBGZJJ2023-2-10) of the State Key Laboratory of Special Surface Protection Materials and Application Technology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52101079) and the Innovation Team Project for Colleges and Universities of Guangdong Province (2023KCXTD030).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data included in this study are available upon request by contact with the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Chen Yu is employed by the State Key Laboratory of Special Surface Protection Materials and Application Technology, China Academy of Machinery Wuhan Research Institute of Materials Protection Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. García-Cabezón, C.; Godinho, V.; Pérez-González, C.; Torres, Y.; Martín-Pedrosa, F. Electropolymerized polypyrrole silver nanocomposite coatings on porous Ti substrates with enhanced corrosion and antibacterial behavior for biomedical applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2023, 29, 101433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jadhav, R.S.; Hundiwale, D.G.; Mahulikar, P.P. Synthesis of nano polyaniline and poly-o-anisidine and applications in alkyd paint formulation to enhance the corrosion resistivity of mild steel. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2009, 7, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yin, Y.; Prabhakar, M.; Ebbinghaus, P.; da Silva, C.C.; Rohwerder, M. Neutral inhibitor molecules entrapped into polypyrrole network for corrosion protection. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 440, 135739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Z.H.; Li, X.L.; Gong, B.; Scharnagl, N.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; Ying, H.J.; Yang, W.Z. Double Stimuli-Responsive Conducting Polypyrrole Nanocapsules for Corrosion-Resistant Epoxy Coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 15, 2067–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, S.A.; Meenakshi, K.S.; Sankaranarayanan, T.S.N.; Srikanth, S. Corrosion resistant behaviour of PANI-metal bilayer coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2008, 62, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Syugaev, A.V.; Maratkanova, A.N.; Smirnov, D.A. Polyaniline films electrodeposited on iron from oxalic acid solution: Linear dichroism of X-ray absorption and molecular arrangement. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2019, 23, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gupta, D.K.; Neupane, S.; Singh, S.; Karki, N.; Yadav, A.P. The effect of electrolytes on the coating of polyaniline on mild steel by electrochemical methods and its corrosion behavior. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 152, 106127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bernard, M.C.; Joiret, S.; Goff, A.H.; Phong, P.V. Protection of iron against corrosion using a polyaniline layer: III. Spectroscopic analysis of the mechanisms accompanying the breakdown. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, B304–B306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, M.X.; Yun, H.; Tan, K.Q.; Guo, A.Q.; Ling, J.W.; Jiang, F.F.; Shen, X.X.; Xu, Q.J. One-step electrochemical synthesis of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) modified polyaniline coating on stainless steel for high corrosion protection performance. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 149, 105908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, S.H.; Wang, P.; Lu, Z.X.; Chen, S.B.; Wang, L.S. Synthesis and corrosion protection of Nb doped TiO2 nanopowders modified polyaniline coating on 316 stainless steel bipolar plates for proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 137, 105327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, L.; Syed, J.A.; Gao, Y.Z.; Lu, H.B.; Meng, X.K. Electrodeposition of Ni(OH)2 reinforced polyaniline coating for corrosion protection of 304 stainless steel. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 440, 1011–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amegroud, H.; Boudalia, M.; Elhawary, M.; Garcia, A.J.; Bellaouchou, A.; Amin, H.M.A. Electropolymerized conducting polyaniline coating on nickel-aluminum bronze alloy for improved corrosion resistance in marine environment. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 691, 133909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pawar, P.; Gaikawad, A.B.; Patil, P.P. Electrochemical synthesis of corrosion protective polyaniline coatings on mild steel from aqueous salicylate medium. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2006, 7, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ganash, A.A.; Al-Nowaiser, F.M.; Al-Thabaiti, S.A.; Hermas, A.A. Comparison study for passivation of stainless steel by coating with polyaniline from two different acids. Prog. Org. Coat. 2011, 72, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kamaraj, K.; Sathiyanarayanan, S.; Venkatachari, G. Electropolymerised polyaniline films on AA 7075 alloy and its corrosion protection performance. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 64, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, S.H.; Wang, P.; Chen, S.B.; Lu, Z.X.; Li, W.H. Electropolymerization and corrosion protection performance of the Nb: TiO2 nanofibers/polyaniline composite coating. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2019, 103, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sasikumar, Y.; Kumar, A.M.; Gasem, Z.M.; Ebenso, E.E. Hybrid nanocomposite from aniline and CeO2 nanoparticles: Surface protective performance on mild steel in acidic environment. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 330, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, Y.Y.; Tian, S.W.; Lin, D.L.; Zhang, Z.H.; Li, G.C. Functional anti-corrosive and anti-bacterial surface coatings based on cuprous oxide/polyaniline microcomposites. Mater. Des. 2022, 216, 110589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jabri, H.A.; Devi, M.G.; Al-Shukaili, M.A. Development of polyaniline-TiO2 nano composite films and its application in corrosion inhibition of oil pipelines. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 100, 100826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sulistyaningsih, E.; Lestari, N. Coating of polyaniline-titanium dioxide (PANI-TiO2) composite for corrosion protection in low carbon steel. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 807, 012046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maruthi, N.; Faisal, M.; Raghavendra, N.; Prasanna, B.P.; Manohara, S.R.; Revanasiddappa, M. Anticorrosive polyaniline-coated copper oxide (PANI/CuO) nanocomposites with tunable electrical properties for broadband electromagnetic interference shielding. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 621, 126611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Maruthi, N.; Faisal, M.; Raghavendra, N.; Prasanna, B.P.; Manohara, S.R.; Revanasiddappa, M. Promising EMI shielding effectiveness and anticorrosive properties of PANI-Nb2O5 nanocomposites: Multifunctional approach. Synth. Met. 2021, 275, 116744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ashwini, I.S.; Pattar, J.; Anjaneyulu, P.; PrakashBabu, D.; Sreekanth, R.; Manohara, S.R.; Nagaraja, M. Synthesis and electrical properties of polyaniline–cerium oxide composites. Synth. Met. 2020, 270, 116588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maruthi, N.; Faisal, M.; Raghavendra, N.; Prasanna, B.P.; Nandan, K.R.; Kumar, K.Y.; Prasad, S.B.B. Polyaniline/V2O5 composites for anticorrosion and electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 259, 124059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, E.; Selvarajan, P.; Muthuraj, D. Preparation and characterization of polyaniline/cerium dioxide (CeO2) nanocomposite via in situ polymerization. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 7148–7156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Z.H.; Shen, Y.B.; Li, Y.B.; Zheng, F.; Liu, L.L. Doping effects of cerium ion on structure and electrochemical properties of polyaniline. Polym. Int. 2018, 67, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shetty, K.; Raj, K.; Mohan, N. Synthesis, characterization and corrosion studies of polyanailine (PANI)/ceriem dioxide (CeO2) nano composite. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 2158–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.W.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, H.H.; Zhang, Z. Preparation and anti-corrosion performance of superhydrophobic silane/graphene oxide composite coating on copper. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 423, 127622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. John, S.; Joseph, B.; Aravindakshan, K.K.; Joseph, A. Inhibition of mild steel corrosion in 1 M hydrochloric acid by 4-(N,N-dimethylaminobenzilidine)-3-mercapto-6-methyl-1,2,4-triazin (4H)-5-one (DAMMT). Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 122, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, X.Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, J.Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.Q. Electrochemical nucleation and growth of Sn onto double reduction steel substrate from a stannous fluoborate acid bath. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2013, 709, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nautiyal, A.; Parida, S. Comparison of polyaniline electrodeposition on carbon steel from oxalic acid and salicylate medium. Prog. Org. Coat. 2016, 94, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mrad, M.; Amor, Y.B.; Dhouibi, L.; Montemor, F. Electrochemical study of polyaniline coating electropolymerized onto AA2024-T3 aluminium alloy: Physical properties and anticorrosion performance. Synth. Met. 2017, 234, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kamada, K.; Higashikawa, K.; Inada, M.; Enomoto, N.; Hojo, J. Photoassisted Anodic Electrodeposition of Ceria Thin Films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 14508–14513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.M.; Du, X.Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.Q. Influences of the main anodic electroplating parameters on cerium oxide films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 305, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lyutov, V.; Kabanova, V.; Gribkova, O.; Nekrasov, A.; Tsakova, V. Electrochemically-obtained polysulfonic-acids doped polyaniline films—A comparative study by electrochemical, microgravimetric and XPS methods. Polymers 2020, 12, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, N.; Feng, J.T.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.N.; Yan, W. Adsorption mechanism of phosphate by polyaniline/TiO2 composite from wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 316, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, H.H.; Zhang, X.; Bian, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Benzotriazole loaded CeO2 nano-containers towards superior anti-corrosive silane coating for protection of copper. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 682, 132844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Joseph, A.; Mathew, K.P.J.; Vandana, S. Zirconium-Doped Ceria Nanoparticles as Anticorrosion Pigments in Waterborne Epoxy–Polymer Coatings. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 4, 834–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, X.; Zhang, T.C.; He, H.Q.; Ouyang, L.; Yuan, S.J. A stearic Acid/CeO2 bilayer coating on AZ31B magnesium alloy with superhydrophobic and self-cleaning properties for corrosion inhibition. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 834, 155210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lyu, L.; Xie, Q.; Yang, Y.Y.; Wang, R.R.; Cen, W.F.; Luo, S.Y.; Yang, W.S.; Gao, Y.; Xiao, Q.Q.; Zou, P.; et al. A novel CeO2 Hollow-Shell sensor constructed for high sensitivity of acetone gas detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 571, 151337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tan, B.C.; Xiang, B.; Zhang, S.T.; Qiang, Y.J.; Xu, L.H.; Chen, S.J.; He, J.H. Papaya leaves extract as a novel eco-friendly corrosion inhibitor for Cu in H2SO4 medium. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 582, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cui, C.; Wu, M.P.; Miao, X.J.; Zhao, Z.S.; Gong, Y.L. Microstructure and corrosion behavior of CeO2/FeCoNiCrMo high-entropy alloy coating prepared by laser cladding. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 890, 161826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, W.; Tan, L.L.; Li, D.R.; Chen, J.X.; Zhao, Y.C.; Liu, L.; Shuai, C.J.; Yang, K.; Atrens, A.; Zhao, M.C. Effect of grain refinement and crystallographic texture produced by friction stir processing on the biodegradation behavior of a Mg-Nd-Zn alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2018, 35, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Y.M.; Jiang, F.W.; Qiang, Y.J.; Zhao, W.J. Synthesizing a novel fluorinated reduced graphene oxide-CeO2 hybrid nanofiller to achieve highly corrosion protection for waterborne epoxy coatings. Carbon 2021, 176, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qian, Y.; Zheng, W.; Chen, W.G.; Feng, T.; Liu, T.X.; Fu, Y.Q. Enhanced functional properties of CeO2 modified graphene/epoxy nanocomposite coating through interface engineering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 409, 126819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ge, C.Y.; Yang, X.G.; Hou, B.R. Synthesis of polyaniline nanofiber and anticorrosion property of polyaniline–epoxy composite coating for Q235 steel. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2011, 9, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, X.L. Electrochemical Evidence of Corrosion Resistance of Polyaniline Film on the Copper Surface. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 4470–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ren, Y.J.; Zeng, C.L. Effect of conducting composite polypyrrole/polyaniline coatings on the corrosion resistance of type 304 stainless steel for bipolar plates of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2008, 182, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Santos, J.R.; Mattoso, L.H.; Motheo, A.J. Investigation of corrosion protection of steel by polyaniline films. Electrochim. Acta 1998, 43, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, Y.B.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, L.Q.; Zhang, F.; Li, S.Q.; Zeng, R.C. Corrosion resistance of a self-healing multilayer film based on SiO2 and CeO2 nanoparticles layer-by-layer assembly on Mg alloys. Mater. Lett. 2019, 237, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Özyılmaz, A.T.; Erbil, M.; Yazıcı, B. The electrochemical synthesis of polyaniline on stainless steel and its corrosion performance. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2006, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jafari, Y.; Ghoreishi, S.M.; Shabani-Nooshabadi, M. Electrochemical deposition and characterization of polyaniline-graphene nanocomposite films and its corrosion protection properties. J. Polym. Res. 2016, 23, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fatahiamirdehi, M.; Mahani, M.; Mirseyed, S.F.; Rostamian, A.; Ostadhassan, M. Enhancing corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel through electrochemical deposition of polyaniline coatings in acidic environments. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 14716–14727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Qiu, C.; Liu, D.; Jin, K.; Fang, L.; Xie, G.; Robertson, J. Electrochemical functionalization of 316 stainless steel with polyaniline-graphene oxide: Corrosion resistance study. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 198, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of mild steel in (a) 0.1 M aniline + 0.3 M oxalic acid, (b) 0.1 M aniline + 0.04 M benzoic acid and (c) 0.1 M aniline + 0.04 M benzoic acid + 0.1 M cerium nitrate + 0.1 M ammonium acetate.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of mild steel in (a) 0.1 M aniline + 0.3 M oxalic acid, (b) 0.1 M aniline + 0.04 M benzoic acid and (c) 0.1 M aniline + 0.04 M benzoic acid + 0.1 M cerium nitrate + 0.1 M ammonium acetate.
Coatings 15 00074 g001
Figure 2. Surface morphology of prepared polyaniline coatings from (a) 0.1 M aniline + 0.3 M oxalic acid, (b) 0.1 M aniline + 0.04 M benzoic acid, (c) 0.1 M aniline + 0.04 M benzoic acid + 0.1 M cerium nitrate + 0.1 M ammonium acetate, (d) EDX of co-deposited polyaniline/CeO2 coating.
Figure 2. Surface morphology of prepared polyaniline coatings from (a) 0.1 M aniline + 0.3 M oxalic acid, (b) 0.1 M aniline + 0.04 M benzoic acid, (c) 0.1 M aniline + 0.04 M benzoic acid + 0.1 M cerium nitrate + 0.1 M ammonium acetate, (d) EDX of co-deposited polyaniline/CeO2 coating.
Coatings 15 00074 g002
Figure 3. XPS measurement of prepared polyaniline/CeO2 coating (a), high-resolution spectrum of (b) N 1s and (c) Ce 3d.
Figure 3. XPS measurement of prepared polyaniline/CeO2 coating (a), high-resolution spectrum of (b) N 1s and (c) Ce 3d.
Coatings 15 00074 g003
Figure 4. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Figure 4. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Coatings 15 00074 g004
Figure 5. (a) Bode plots, (b) Nyquist plots of bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution, (c) corresponding equivalent electric circuits.
Figure 5. (a) Bode plots, (b) Nyquist plots of bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution, (c) corresponding equivalent electric circuits.
Coatings 15 00074 g005aCoatings 15 00074 g005b
Table 1. Chemical composition of mild steel.
Table 1. Chemical composition of mild steel.
ElementCSiMnCrNiCuFe
%0.170.150.390.110.130.32balance
Table 2. Compositions of three different electrolytes for electropolymerization of polyaniline and polyaniline@CeO2 coatings.
Table 2. Compositions of three different electrolytes for electropolymerization of polyaniline and polyaniline@CeO2 coatings.
SampleAniline
(mol/L)
Oxalic Acid
(mol/L)
Benzoic Acid
(mol/L)
Cerium Nitrate
(mol/L)
Ammonium Acetate
(mol/L)
10.10.3---
20.1-0.04--
30.1-0.040.10.1
Table 3. Potentiodynamic polarization parameter for bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Table 3. Potentiodynamic polarization parameter for bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
ConditionEcorr.
(V)
jcorr.
(μA.cm−2)
IE%
bare−0.92334.62-
polyaniline (oxalic acid)−0.8368.18576.4
polyaniline (benzoic acid)−0.6751.09696.8
polyaniline/CeO2−0.5430.63298.2
Table 4. EIS parameters for bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Table 4. EIS parameters for bare mild steel, prepared polyaniline and polyaniline/CeO2 coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
ConditionRct
kΩ.cm2
CPEdl
Ω−1·cm−2·sn
ncRc
Ω.cm2
CPEc
Ω−1·cm−2·sn
ndlRp
kΩ.cm2
PE%
bare1.063.81 × 10−50.83---1.06-
polyaniline (oxalic acid)1.143.17 × 10−50.8327.79.57 × 10−50.731.179.4
polyaniline (benzoic acid)11.36.59 × 10−60.849905.38 × 10−50.7712.391.4
polyaniline/
CeO2
23.63.26 × 10−60.8647542.93 × 10−50.8128.496.3
Table 5. Comparison of anti-corrosion performance of some polyaniline-based coatings prepared from electropolymerization.
Table 5. Comparison of anti-corrosion performance of some polyaniline-based coatings prepared from electropolymerization.
SampleElectrolyteIE%Ref.
polyanilinebenzoic acid96.8this work
polyaniline/CeO2benzoic acid + cerium nitrate98.2this work
polyanilineoxalic acid81.4[51]
polyanilinesodium potassium tartrate82.5[7]
polyaniline/graphenesulfuric acid + grahpene97.0[52]
polyanilinesulfuric acid94.4[53]
polyaniline-GOsodium dodecyl sulfate+GO98.4[54]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, H.; Du, X.; Yang, Z.; Chen, Y. One-Step In Situ Electrochemical Synthesis of Polyaniline/CeO2 Composite Coating for Enhanced Corrosion Protection of Mild Steel. Coatings 2025, 15, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010074

AMA Style

Zhou H, Du X, Yang Z, Chen Y. One-Step In Situ Electrochemical Synthesis of Polyaniline/CeO2 Composite Coating for Enhanced Corrosion Protection of Mild Steel. Coatings. 2025; 15(1):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Haoyao, Xiaoqing Du, Zhongnian Yang, and Yu Chen. 2025. "One-Step In Situ Electrochemical Synthesis of Polyaniline/CeO2 Composite Coating for Enhanced Corrosion Protection of Mild Steel" Coatings 15, no. 1: 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010074

APA Style

Zhou, H., Du, X., Yang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2025). One-Step In Situ Electrochemical Synthesis of Polyaniline/CeO2 Composite Coating for Enhanced Corrosion Protection of Mild Steel. Coatings, 15(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15010074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop