Next Article in Journal
FTIR Characterization of the Development of Antimicrobial Catheter Coatings Loaded with Fluoroquinolones
Next Article in Special Issue
Gloss, Light Reflection and Iridescence in Ceramic Tile Enamels Containing ZrO2 and ZnO
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Different Electrolyte Additives and Structural Characteristics of Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Coatings on AZ31 Magnesium Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Femtosecond Laser-Induced Damage Characterization of Multilayer Dielectric Coatings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Some Flexographic Printing Process Conditions on the Optical Density and Tonal Value Increase of Overprinted Plastic Films

by
Zuzanna Żołek-Tryznowska
1,*,
Maciej Rombel
1,
Georgij Petriaszwili
1,
Sandra Dedijer
2 and
Nemanja Kašiković
2
1
Mechanics and Printing Institute, Faculty of Production Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Narbutta 85, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland
2
Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg D. Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2020, 10(9), 816; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090816
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 13 August 2020 / Accepted: 15 August 2020 / Published: 24 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Visual Effects Coatings and Surfaces)

Abstract

:
The print quality of prints performed with flexographic printing technology is influenced by various parameters such as viscosity of the printing inks, printing substrates, plates, anilox rolls, etc. The aim of this work is to analyze the influence of ink viscosity, printing plate and printing base on selected properties of print quality, such as optical density of full tone area and the increase of tonal value (TVI). Additionally, the printed dots on 5, 15, 30, 50 and 75% of half tone area were investigated using digital microscopy. The least square fitting method in a matrix form was successfully used in order to confirm the influence of printing process parameters on print quality. The results obtained reveal the significant influence of the printing plate and printing substrate characteristics and the lesser influence of printing ink viscosity for 40–100% coverage area. The values of the optical densities of full tone areas are mainly influenced by the properties of the printing plate and the printing base. Furthermore, the optical density decreases when the value of flow time decreases, which is related to the lower thickness of dried ink film. The TVI on light tones (0 to 20%) is mainly influenced by the ink viscosity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Flexographic printing is a fundamental, well-established roll-to-roll printing technique used for printing products such as flexible packaging, multiwall bags, labels, corrugated packaging and even printed electronics, printing with ZnO inks and as well as gas and biosensors [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Nowadays, more than 75% of packaging products are printed with this technique [6]. In flexography, the following printing substrates may be used: paper, corrugated cardboard, and nonabsorbent materials such as plastic and biodegradable films and aluminum foils. This technology requires, in most cases, flexible, raised-image printing plates (rubber or photopolymer) and low-viscosity and rapid-drying fluid inks [11]. The printing ink is firstly transferred from the reservoir to an anilox roller where a large number of finely engraved cells are filled with printing ink. Next, the ink is transferred from the anilox roller onto a photopolymer printing plate, placed on a plate cylinder. In this stage, the printing ink is subjected to both shear and extensional stresses [7,12]. Then, the plate comes into contact with the printing substrate on the impression cylinder to complete the printing process. Finally, the printed image is consolidated by the drying of the ink.
Flexographic printing technology requires low-viscosity ink, which allows regular ink flow into the printing unit. There are three types of flexographic printing inks: solvent-based, water-based and UV-curable inks. Printing plates, nowadays, predominantly use photopolymers. The printing inks typically contain a considerable amount of polymer resin that binds particles of dyes or pigments and eventually creates a film of printing ink, which is seen by the human eye as a printed image. These various types of particles lead to the exhibition of viscoelastic and non-Newtonian characteristics of printing inks [13].
The printed products are characterized by the print quality. In general, the assessment of print quality is a complex process which may be conducted through defining the optical properties of a print, i.e., gloss, color, thickness of dried ink film, tonal value increase (or dot gain), etc. [14,15]. Prior to optical parameter measurements, print quality is checked visually according to ISO standard [16], where minimum requirements of visual quality control and viewing conditions are specified. One of the fundamental print quality parameters is tonal value increase, which enables tone definition and color reproduction and additionally influences the image depth of field [17]. The tonal value increase is one of the most important measured values. It allows control of the printing process and is directly related to the quality of the printed image [18].
The quality of the print is greatly determined by the preparatory work in the prepress and printing processes. The type of printing machine, the pressure between cylinders in the printing unit, used materials—inks and printing substrate—and type and quality of the plate influence the final quality of print. Furthermore, properties of the anilox roller, type of mounting tape placed under the printing plate to adjust its deformation and control of the printing process [19,20,21,22] may have an impact on the quality. Moreover, the interactions between printing ink and printing substrate are influenced by properties of the printing ink, such as viscosity, surface tension and wettability. Additionally, uneven absorption and distribution of ink components are primary causes for defects such as unevenness and mottle [23] which may be observed by the customer as poor print quality.
Rheological properties of inks play a significant role in the printing process [24,25]. Hence, the viscosity, together with the flow behavior, has a major influence on the flow of the ink in the printing unit. During printing, the volatile solvents evaporate, causing a change in the viscosity and color of ink. Too low viscosity of the printing ink results in prints which are characterized by insufficient color intensity and inadequate optical density [26]. Moreover, the printing ink may flow from the printed image on the substrate, additionally may flood areas, and as a consequence raster circles may arise around the printed element. On the other hand, if the printing ink exhibits viscosity that is too high, the dried printing ink shows poor adhesion to the base.
The problem of the influence of ink viscosity of flexographic printing inks was studied previously in several works, i.e., [25,27,28]. Gu et al., has shown the influence of various parameters such as pH and temperature of the ink on ink viscosity and hence on the size of the printed dot [24]. When the ink viscosity is too high, the ink transfer is poor in the printing unit; when the ink viscosity is to low [24], the printing dots are bigger which is related to flooding of the ink. Furthermore, Gencoglu has investigated the influence of water-based and solvent-based ink viscosity on dot area on overprinted coated and uncoated papers and has shown that the same dot area was obtained when using a solvent-based or water-based flexography printing ink characterized by 17 s ink flow [27]. Wang et al., has presented the influence of viscosity in chitosan-based flexographic printing inks on the print quality of overprinted papers [28] and it was presented, that the molecular mass of chitosan affects the viscosity and print quality of an overprinted paper base. However, in this work, printing was performed using a laboratory printing machine, primarily IGT F1.
On the other hand, some researchers have investigated the influence of printing conditions on print quality. For instant, Tomašegović et al., analyzed the influence of printing base and printing plate on the TVI and optical density of prints [29]. Next, Olsson et al., observed the effect of surface polarity of the printing base on final dot gain [30]. Poljaček et al., deeply analyzed the properties of printing plates and the final impact on the print quality of the obtained prints [19,31].
In this paper, we narrow the analyses to the influence of the most relevant parameters for the printing process: changes in the optical density of the solid tone area and tonal value increase. In this regard, we have emphasized the impact of ink viscosity on selected properties of prints. In order to determine TVI, densitometric measurements of half-tone patches in the range between 2 and 100% were performed. The printing process was performed in industrial conditions using two different types of printing plates and two different printing substrates (plastic films). The printing was carried out with CMYK flexographic, solvent-based printing inks, characterized by different flow times (15, 25 and 35 s). It should be highlighted, that printing was performed in industrial conditions, not in the laboratory. The printing process parameters, such as speed, pressure, etc., were constant. Furthermore, we have performed microscopic analysis of the half-tone areas. Finally, we have used the least square fitting method in a matrix form in order to confirm our observations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

As printing inks, CMYK (color Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black) process solvent printing inks Solvaplast (Sun Chemicals) were used. These inks are used for printing flexible food packaging. The inks were characterized by maximum pigmentation (80%) according to the standards used in the Amerplast printing house. Furthermore, according to the supplier the best results are achieved at viscosities 16–25 s (according to cup with 4 mm outlet diameter [32]). The printing inks exhibited flow viscosity of 15, 25 and 35 s specified by the flow time in a flow cup (volume 100 mL, outlet diameter 4 mm). The measurements were performed at 23 ± 0.5 °C according to the ISO standard [32]. The relative error of measurement was less than 3%.
Two different photopolymer printing plates were used: DuPont Cyrel Fast DFR 45 and Kodak Flexcell NX with DigiCup structure. The properties of the printing plates are listed in Table 1. For the mounting of both plates, the same mounting tape was used. It was chosen according to its tack and cushion properties for the job being printed, in order to optimally correspond to both plates and both printing substrates as well.
As a printing base, two white opaque plastic films were used: BoPP (35 μm thickness) and LDPE (40 μm thickness). The surface free energies of the BoPP and PE plastic films are 40 and 42 mJ·m2, respectively, according to the ISO standard [33].

2.2. Ink Rheology Measurements

The rheological behavior of inks was studied using a Rheolab QC rotational rheometer (Anton Paar, Austria) with concentric cylinder geometry (CC39). The shear stress was measured while the controlled applied shear rate increased from 0 to 1000 s–1. The standard volume (60 mL) of the sample was placed in a measuring cup. The measurements were repeated twice with new sampling at 23 ± 0.5 °C.

2.3. Printing

The printing was performed using an 8-color flexo printing machine Flexpress 6S-8 (Fischer & Krecke, Bielefeld, Germany) equipped with GTT laser engraved anilox rolls with patented Open Slalom Ink Channel geometry. The printing was performed with a constant printing speed of 300 m/min, and the plastic film web tension was 50 and 60 N for BOPP and PE, respectively. The drying temperature was 50 and 60 °C for BOPP and PE, respectively. The printing conditions were kept constant, regardless of the printing plate used or the viscosity of printing inks. The tests were carried out in very short periods of printing time—the printing machine was working about 1 min in each of the printed options.
A series of half-tone patches in increasing order (1, 2, …, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25, …, 95, 97, 98, 100%), as presented in Figure 1, was used in order to monitor reproducibility of the prints in ink coverage values, i.e., for the measurement of optical densities and the increase of tonal value. Additionally, it was also used for microscopic analysis.

2.4. Print Quality Measurements

The optical density (OD) and tonal value increase (TVI) were measured using X-Rite SpectroEye with the following settings: D50 illuminant using a 2° observer, DIN density standard and without polarization filter. Data collection was performed at six different positions on the samples, and the reported values are the average of these measurements.
The TPL digital microscope with 2 MPIX with 1/4″ CMOS sensor was used in order to generate microscopic images of the reproduction of the half-tone areas used for the visual assessments. The microscope is equipped with a physical matrix resolution of 1.3 million pixels. Microscopic images of the areas of interest were captured from both the plates and prints: 5, 15, 30, 50 and 75% of half-tone area.

2.5. Least Square (LS) Fitting

The collected results were used to build a matrix for the least square (LS) fitting model according to [34]. The input parameters were: type of printing plate, type of printing substrate and the flow time of the printing ink. The outlet parameters were: optical density of solid tone area and tonal value increase of 5, 40 and 80% of nominal coverage value.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Ink Rheology

Prior to industrial printing, the rheology, kinematic viscosity (flow time) and flow curve, of investigated CMYK printing inks were determined. The flexographic technique requires low-viscosity printing inks (viscosity in the range of 0.05−0.5 Pa∙s) characterized by flow time in the range 18–35 s (outlet diameter of 4 mm) [35], thus we have chosen the following values of flow times: 15, 25 and 35 s as a viscosity below the required range, viscosity in the middle of the range and maximum value of viscosity, respectively. However, the highest values of flow time did not allow printing using the industrial machine. This tendency was observed for cyan printing ink. The flexographic printing inks are shear-thinning or pseudoplastic materials. Thus, the viscosity of the investigated inks decreased when the shear rate increased. The flow curves of the investigated magenta printing ink are shown on Figure 2 and Figure S1. The flow curves were fitted by the Ostwald–de Waele model, according to Equation (1) [36]:
τ = c∙γp,
where c is a consistency coefficient, and the exponent p is a power-law index which characterizes the flow behavior: p < 1 for shear-thinning flow behavior; p > 1 for shear-thickening flow behavior and p = 1 for ideal viscous (Newtonian) flow behavior. The parameters c and p along with R-squared values of the fitting for the investigated printing inks are listed in Table 2; the flow curves of printing inks are shown on Figure 2. According to the Ostwald–de Waele model, the value of the exponent p was less than 1, so the investigated printing inks exhibited pseudoplastic flow behavior, as expected. However, the values of the exponent p decreased with the increasing viscosity of printing ink (flow time of printing ink).

3.2. Optical Density of Solid Tone Area

The printing was performed in industrial conditions. All factors were kept constant during printing: printing plate pressure, hardness of mounting tapes, anilox rolls, solvents used for diluting printing inks, pressure of the rouge chamber to the anilox roll or corona refreshing during the printing process, etc. The changing parameters were: type of printing plate, type of printing substrate and changes of ink viscosity.
The values of the optical densities (OD) of the solid tone areas are summarized in Table 3. The changes of values of the OD for magenta printing ink are shown in Figure 3. The values of optical densities of solid tone areas were mainly influenced by the properties of the printing plate and the printing base. It can be noticed the optical density for samples with the Kodak printing plate were higher regardless of the flow time of the printing ink and the printing base. The microstructure of the printing elements affected the ability of the plate to pick up and transfer more printing ink from the plate onto the printing base. The optical density was higher on PE plastic base than on BoPP. This may be related to the higher values of surface free energy (42 mJ/m2) and greater wettability of the printing base by printing ink. Printing inks with high viscosities are more difficult to pull out of the cells of the anilox roll. On the other hand, low viscosity of the printing ink increases the amount transferred to the printing plates. However, lower viscosity of the ink is usually associated with higher solvent content. Hence, the optical density decreases when the value of flow time decreases, which is related to the lower thickness of dried ink film.

3.3. Tonal Value Increase

The TV of investigated inks exhibited similar values regardless of the color of the printing ink. None of the experimental curves show significant increase of tonal value. As an example, results of the reference and measured tone values for magenta printing ink are presented in Figure 4. No great differences of TV were observed for different ink flow viscosities. It can be concluded that the tonal value is dependent on the properties of the printing substrate and the type of printing plate and independent of, or only slightly dependent on, ink viscosity.
Generally, tonal value increase is positive due to the applied printing pressures [11]. Figure 5 shows the correlation between the reference tone value and the increase of tone value (TVI) for 35, 25 and 15 s magenta printed on BoPP using two different plates. Figures S2–S8 shows the correlation between the reference tone value and TVI for others investigated inks. The TVI for other investigated printing inks are presented in Supplementary Materials. The results of TVI for investigated inks were compared with the values of TVI according to the ISO standard (dashed line) [37]. For the FAST plate, the highest TVI values were recorded with 35 s flow time printing ink (black line), and the values of TVI were higher than the reference ISO TVI values (dashed blue line). On the other hand, TVI values for 25 and 15 s flow time of printing ink were higher in the range of 0–40% tone and lower or similar in the range 40–100% tone area. For the Kodak plate (see Figure 4), the TVI reproduction curve for the 35 s flow time of the printing ink almost matched the reference ISO TVI values. Additionally, the values of TVI for 25 and 15 s flow time of printing ink were higher than ISO TVI values. This was the opposite of what was observed for the FAST plate.
The analyses of microscopic images (see Figure 6 and Figure 7, and Figures S9–S16 in Supplementary Materials) of prints reveal that they, in terms of light tones (0 to 20%), were improperly overprinted, particularly for the inks of 25 and 35 s of flow time. Not all dots were overprinted equally; microscopic observation reveals large irregularity in the appearance and shape of the dots. However, this effect was not observed for all half-tone dots and caused deviations in the TVI reproduction curve in the range of 0–10% (see Figure 5). It is interesting that, for the low-viscosity printing inks, 25 and 15 s flow time, in the range of 40–60% tone area using FAST plate, the TVI reproduction curve exhibited lower values than the ISO TVI values. The analysis of microscopic images of the 50% tone area for investigated prints overprinted with magenta ink may clarify this effect (see Figure 6 and Figure 7). The shape of dots obtained using the FAST plate was round, but on the other hand the shape of dots obtained by Kodak plates was square. Furthermore, it can be seen that the lower viscosity of printing ink caused “flooding” of dots.
In order to confirm the observation regarding of the influence of printing plate on the OD and TVI, the least square analysis was performed. Influential parameters in the flexographic reproduction system can be quantified using the LS fitting method in matrix form [29]. This method was used in order to assign the weight coefficients of the printing process that affect the selected print quality parameters of prints—optical value and tonal values (80, 40, 5% half-tone).
Figure 8 shows the weight coefficients for the chosen parameters (printing base or printing plate) of the printing process and ink flow that influence the print quality of the prints. The influence of selected parameters may have a positive or negative sign, representing the proportional or inversely proportional connection, respectively [29]. Furthermore, a higher value of weight coefficient is related to a bigger influence of the corresponding parameter.
The obtained results of the weight coefficients pointed to the dominant impact of the plate and base type on the analyzed properties of the print (optical density of solid tone area and TVI). The ink flow time generally had a negligible effect on the properties of print quality, except cyan printing ink, otherwise the effects of the three parameters were comparable.
The viscosity of the ink had the lowest influence on the quality of the print, which confirmed our observations. In this regard, the print quality depended mainly on the plate and the printing substrate being used. However, for the tone area in the range 40–100%, the impact of printing plate and substrate was higher. On the other hand, for the light tones, in the coverage of 5%, the influence of ink viscosity was greater—this may be related to the flooding of the ink from the overprinted dots prior to drying of the ink.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we have analyzed the influence of selected printing conditions on the print quality of a printed plastic substrate. The objective of the present work was to analyze the influence of the printing ink viscosity, printing plate and printing substrate on the quality of the print expressed through optical density and TVI changes.
Our results reveal that the viscosity of the printing ink exhibited a lower influence on optical density of solid tone area and tonal value increase than that exhibited by the type of printing base and printing plate. However, based on our results, it can be concluded that higher viscosity of printing inks is related to higher optical density of solid tone. The optical density decreases when the value of viscosity decreases. Additionally, for the 15% tonal value area smaller tonal increase was observed. Further, we have successfully quantified the influence of these parameters using the least square fitting method. The results presented in this work, reveal that print quality is mainly influenced by the type of printing plate and the printing base used, so the interaction between the plate and the base is one of the most important factors. Hence, the optimization of the process should be in terms of the printing plate or base used and not of the printing ink. Furthermore, this research has underlined the importance of choice of printing plate and printing base in order to achieve satisfactory tonal value increase or optical density.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/10/9/816/s1: Figure S1: Shear stress (τ) versus shear rate (γ) dependencies measured for (a) cyan, (b) yellow and (c) black printing ink characterized by various flow times 15 s (green dots), 25 s (brown dots) and 35 s (blue dots) All experimental points are fitted by the Ostwald model. Figure S2: Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted BoPP with cyan printing ink using (a) FAST and (b) Kodak plate. Red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI (ISO 12647-6). Figure S3: Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted PE with cyan printing ink using (a) FAST plate and (b) Kodak plate. Red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI (ISO 12647-6). Figure S4: Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted PE with magenta printing ink using (a) FAST plate and (b) Kodak plate. Black line: 35 s flow time; red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI (ISO 12647-6). Figure S5: Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted BoPP with yellow printing ink using (a) FAST plate and (b) Kodak plate. Black line: 35 s flow time; red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI (ISO 12647-6). Figure S6: Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted PE with yellow printing ink using (a) FAST plate and (b) Kodak plate. Black line: 35 s flow time; red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI (ISO 12647-6). Figure S7: Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted BoPP with black printing ink using (a) FAST plate and (b) Kodak plate. Black line: 35 s flow time; red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI (ISO 12647-6). Figure S8: Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted PE with black printing ink using (a) FAST plate and (b) Kodak plate. Black line: 35 s flow time; red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI (ISO 12647-6). Figure S9: Microscopic images of 15% tone area for overprinted BoPP film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time. Figure S10: Microscopic images of 30% tone area for overprinted BoPP film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time. Figure S11: Microscopic images of 75% tone area for overprinted BoPP film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time. Figure S12: Microscopic images of 5% tone area for overprinted PE film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time. Figure S13: Microscopic images of 15% tone area for overprinted PE film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time. Figure S14: Microscopic images of 30% tone area for overprinted PE film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time. Figure S15: Microscopic images of 50% tone area for overprinted PE film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time. Figure S16: Microscopic images of 75% tone area for overprinted PE film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Ż.-T. and G.P.; methodology, Z.Ż.-T. and G.P.; formal analysis, Z.Ż.-T.; investigation, M.R.; resources, M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Ż.-T., S.D. and N.K.; writing—review and editing, Z.Ż.-T., S.D. and N.K.; supervision, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the small grant of the Scientific Council of Mechanical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Amerplast Sp z.o.o., Poland, for the supporting the printing in industrial conditions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Deganello, D.; Cherry, J.A.; Gethin, D.T.; Claypole, T.C. Patterning of micro-scale conductive networks using reel-to-reel flexographic printing. Thin Solid Film. 2010, 518, 6113–6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Faddoul, R.; Reverdy-Bruas, N.; Blayo, A.; Haas, T.; Zeilmann, C. Optimisation of silver paste for flexography printing on LTCC substrate. Microelectron. Reliab. 2012, 52, 1483–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Palo, M.; Kolakovic, R.; Laaksonen, T.; Määttänen, A.; Genina, N.; Salonen, J.; Peltonen, J.; Sandler, N. Fabrication of drug-loaded edible carrier substrates from nanosuspensions by flexographic printing. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 494, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alem, S.; Graddage, N.; Lu, J.; Kololuoma, T.; Movileanu, R.; Tao, Y. Flexographic printing of polycarbazole-based inverted solar cells. Org. Electron. 2018, 52, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dam, H.F.; Andersen, T.R.; Madsen, M.V.; Mortensen, T.K.; Pedersen, M.F.; Nielsen, U.; Krebs, F.C. Roll and roll-to-roll process scaling through development of a compact flexo unit for printing of back electrodes. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 140, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Izdebska, J. Printing on Polymers: Fundamentals and Applications; Thomas, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Morgan, M.L.; Holder, A.; Curtis, D.J.; Deganello, D. Formulation, characterisation and flexographic printing of novel Boger fluids to assess the effects of ink elasticity on print uniformity. Rheol. Acta 2018, 57, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gajadhur, M.; Regulska, M. Mechanical and light resistance of flexographic conductive ink films intended for printed electronics. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 178, 108381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arrabito, G.; Aleeva, Y.; Pezzilli, R.; Ferrara, V.; Medaglia, P.G.; Pignataro, B.; Prestopino, G. Printing ZnO Inks: From Principles to Devices. Crystals 2020, 10, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gusain, A.; Thankappan, A.; Thomas, S. Roll-to-roll printing of polymer and perovskite solar cells: Compatible materials and processes. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 13490–13542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kipphan, H. Handbook of Print Media: Technologies and Production Methods; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; ISBN 9783540673262. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sauer, H.M.; Bornemann, N.; Dörsam, E. Viscous fingering in functional flexo printing: An inevitable bug? In Proceedings of the Large-Area, Organic & Printed Electronics Convention (LOPE-C), Messe Frankfurt, Germany, 28–30 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lindner, A.; Wagner, C. Viscoelastic surface instabilities. Comptes Rendus Phys. 2009, 10, 712–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Izdebska, J.; Zołek-Tryznowska, Z.; Ksia̧zek, T. Influence of artificial aging on cellulose film the optical properties of printed and non-printed biodegradable film bases. Agro Food Ind. Hi Tech 2013, 24, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  15. Simonenko, K.V.; Bulatova, G.S.; Antropova, L.B.; Varepo, L.G. Quality control of the print with the application of statistical methods. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 998, 012032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Graphic Technology and Photography—Viewing Conditions 2009; ISO 3664; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  17. Dinesh, C. Comparative analysis of densitometric tonal value increase and colorimetric tonal value increase. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Comput. Technol. 2018, 8, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kachin, N.; Spiridonov, I. Optical density and colour difference in printing on different types of paper. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2004, 38, 255–264. [Google Scholar]
  19. Poljaček, S.M.; Cigula, T.; Tomašegović, T.; Brajnović, O. Meeting the quality requirements in the flexographic plate making process. Int. Circ. Graph. Educ. Res. 2013, 6, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
  20. Poljaček, S.M.; Tomašegović, T.; Leskovac, M.; Jakovljević, S. Neural network-based UV adjustment of the photopolymer surface for modification of coating properties printed in flexography. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2020, 17, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bould, D.C.; Hamblyn, S.M.; Gethin, D.T.; Claypole, T.C. Effect of impression pressure and anilox specification on solid and halftone density. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2011, 225, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Havenko, S.; Ohirko, M.; Ryvak, P.; Kotmalova, O. Determining the Factors That Affect the Quality of Test Prints at Flexographic Printing. East. Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. 2020, 2, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rousu, S.; Gane, P.; Eklund, D. Distribution of offset ink constituents in paper coating and implications for print quality. Tappi J. 2003, 4, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  24. GU, C.; WANG, Y.; XING, J.; DAI, H. On the Influence of Viscosity of Water-based Inks and How the Viscosity Influences the Dot Gain in Flexographic Printing. J. Beijing Inst. Graph. Commun. 2008, 4, 4. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lin, H.-W.; Chang, C.-P.; Hwu, W.-H.; Ger, M.-D. The rheological behaviors of screen-printing pastes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 197, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Eldred, N.R.; Foundation, G.A.T. What the Printer Should Know about Ink; GATF Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2001; ISBN 9780883622841. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gencoglu, E.F.E. Influence of ink viscosity on dot gain and print density in flexography. Chem. Asian J. 2012, 5, 1999–2002. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, H.; Guo, T.; Li, H. Evaluation of viscosity and printing quality of chitosan-based flexographic inks: The effect of chitosan molecular weight. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tomašegović, T.; Cigula, T.; Huzjak, J.; Prša, M. LS fitting of the material properties influencing the print quality in flexograpgic reproduction system. GRID Symp. 2018, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Olsson, R.; Yang, L.; van Stam, J.; Lestelius, M. Effects on ink setting in flexographic printing: Coating polarity and dot gain. Nord. Pulp. Pap. Res. J. 2006, 21, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tomašegović, T.; Mahović Poljaček, S.; Strižić Jakovljević, M.; Urbas, R. Effect of the Common Solvents on UV-Modified Photopolymer and EPDM Flexographic Printing Plates and Printed Ink Films. Coatings 2020, 10, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Paints and Varnishes—Determination of Flow Time by Use of Flow Cups; ISO 2431:2019; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:2431:ed-6:v2:en (accessed on 20 August 2020).
  33. Plastics—Film and Sheeting—Determination of Wetting Tension 2003; ISO 8296:2003; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:8296:ed-2:v1:en (accessed on 20 August 2020).
  34. Bjorck, A. Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems; SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1996; ISBN 1611971489. [Google Scholar]
  35. Havlínová, B.; Cicák, V.; Brezová, V.; Horňáková, L. Water-reducible flexographic printing inks—Rheological behaviour and interaction with paper substrates. J. Mater. Sci. 1999, 34, 2081–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mezger, T.G. The Rheology Handbook: For Users of Rotational and Oscillatory Rheometers; Vincentz Network GmbH & Co. KG: Hannover, Germany, 2006; ISBN 3878701748. [Google Scholar]
  37. Graphic Technology—Process Control for the Production of Half-tone Colour Separations, Proofs and Production Prints—Part 6: Flexographic Printing; ISO 12647-6: 2012; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012; Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:12647:-6:ed-2:v1:en (accessed on 20 August 2020).
Figure 1. Printed test chart. The area used for the performed analysis is highlighted with a red rectangle.
Figure 1. Printed test chart. The area used for the performed analysis is highlighted with a red rectangle.
Coatings 10 00816 g001
Figure 2. Shear stress (τ) versus shear rate (γ) dependencies measured for magenta printing ink characterized by various flow times 15 (green triangles), 25 (brown squares) and 35 s (blue dots). All experimental points are fitted by the Ostwald model.
Figure 2. Shear stress (τ) versus shear rate (γ) dependencies measured for magenta printing ink characterized by various flow times 15 (green triangles), 25 (brown squares) and 35 s (blue dots). All experimental points are fitted by the Ostwald model.
Coatings 10 00816 g002
Figure 3. Optical density (OD) of the solid tone area as a function of printing ink flow time for magenta printing ink.
Figure 3. Optical density (OD) of the solid tone area as a function of printing ink flow time for magenta printing ink.
Coatings 10 00816 g003
Figure 4. Dependency between the reference and measured tone values for magenta printing ink (BoPP printing base, FAST plate). Black dotted line: 35 s flow time; red solid line: 25 s flow time; green dashed line: 15 s flow time.
Figure 4. Dependency between the reference and measured tone values for magenta printing ink (BoPP printing base, FAST plate). Black dotted line: 35 s flow time; red solid line: 25 s flow time; green dashed line: 15 s flow time.
Coatings 10 00816 g004
Figure 5. Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted BoPP with magenta printing ink using (a) FAST plate and (b) Kodak plate. Black line: 35 s flow time; red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI [37].
Figure 5. Measured TVI of the samples for overprinted BoPP with magenta printing ink using (a) FAST plate and (b) Kodak plate. Black line: 35 s flow time; red line: 25 s flow time; green line: 15 s flow time; dashed line: ISO TVI [37].
Coatings 10 00816 g005
Figure 6. Microscopic images of 5% tone area for overprinted BoPP film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time.
Figure 6. Microscopic images of 5% tone area for overprinted BoPP film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time.
Coatings 10 00816 g006
Figure 7. Microscopic images of 50% tone area for overprinted BoPP film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time.
Figure 7. Microscopic images of 50% tone area for overprinted BoPP film with magenta printing ink for (a) FAST plate, 35 s flow time; (b) FAST plate, 25 s flow time; (c) FAST plate, 15 s flow time; (d) Kodak plate, 35 s flow time; (e) Kodak plate, 25 s flow time, (f) Kodak plate, 15 s flow time.
Coatings 10 00816 g007
Figure 8. Weight coefficients of influential parameters for (a) cyan, (b) magenta, (c) yellow, (d) black printing inks. Color blue: 100%; color orange: 80%; grey 40% and light orange 5% measured tonal value.
Figure 8. Weight coefficients of influential parameters for (a) cyan, (b) magenta, (c) yellow, (d) black printing inks. Color blue: 100%; color orange: 80%; grey 40% and light orange 5% measured tonal value.
Coatings 10 00816 g008
Table 1. Properties of printing plates.
Table 1. Properties of printing plates.
PropertyDuPont Cyrel Fast DFRKodak Flexcell DigiCup NX
Thickness1.14 mm (0.045 inch)1.14 mm (0.045 inch)
Hardness78–80 Sh A71–77 Sh A
Linear reproduction1–99% 54 L/cm1–99% 60 L/cm
Minimum positive line0.100 mm (4 mil)0.020 mm (0.8 mil)
Minimum point size300 µm50 µm
Relief depth0.55 mm (0.022 inch)0.7 mm (0.03125 inch)
Table 2. Ostwald–de Waele model parameters along with R-squared values of the fitting calculated for the flow curves of investigated printing inks.
Table 2. Ostwald–de Waele model parameters along with R-squared values of the fitting calculated for the flow curves of investigated printing inks.
Flow TimecpR2
Cyan
150.17 ± 0.031.03 ± 0.010.999
250.03 ± 0.010.87 ± 0.010.999
Magenta
150.04 ± 0.030.90 ± 0.010.999
250.45 ± 0.000.65 ± 0.020.999
350.75 ± 0.000.60 ± 0.030.999
Yellow
150.03 ± 0.040.85 ± 0.020.988
250.14 ± 0.030.83 ± 0.010.999
350.28 ± 0.020.80 ± 0.000.999
Black
150.06 ± 0.030.83 ± 0.000.999
250.59 ± 0.020.67 ± 0.000.999
350.85 ± 0.030.64 ± 0.020.999
Table 3. Optical density of the solid tone area.
Table 3. Optical density of the solid tone area.
Plate:FastKodak
Printing Base:BoPPPEBoPPPE
Cyan
251.29 ± 0.021.32 ± 0.051.65 ± 0.021.71 ± 0.03
151.20 ± 0.021.24 ± 0.011.53 ± 0.011.55 ± 0.02
Magenta
351.14 ± 0.021.21 ± 0.031.55 ± 0.021.60 ± 0.01
251.11 ± 0.021.15 ± 0.011.49 ± 0.021.57 ± 0.02
151.05 ± 0.011.12 ± 0.011.36 ± 0.011.35 ± 0.01
Yellow
351.18 ± 0.021.56 ± 0.011.56 ± 0.011.66 ± 0.03
251.18 ± 0.021.57 ± 0.011.57 ± 0.011.63 ± 0.01
151.06 ± 0.011.35 ± 0.011.35 ± 0.011.33 ± 0.01
Black
351.01 ± 0.031.02 ± 0.021.20 ± 0.021.25 ± 0.05
251.05 ± 0.021.00 ± 0.021.24 ± 0.011.37 ± 0.10
150.98 ± 0.010.92 ± 0.011.21 ± 0.021.16 ± 0.02

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Żołek-Tryznowska, Z.; Rombel, M.; Petriaszwili, G.; Dedijer, S.; Kašiković, N. Influence of Some Flexographic Printing Process Conditions on the Optical Density and Tonal Value Increase of Overprinted Plastic Films. Coatings 2020, 10, 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090816

AMA Style

Żołek-Tryznowska Z, Rombel M, Petriaszwili G, Dedijer S, Kašiković N. Influence of Some Flexographic Printing Process Conditions on the Optical Density and Tonal Value Increase of Overprinted Plastic Films. Coatings. 2020; 10(9):816. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090816

Chicago/Turabian Style

Żołek-Tryznowska, Zuzanna, Maciej Rombel, Georgij Petriaszwili, Sandra Dedijer, and Nemanja Kašiković. 2020. "Influence of Some Flexographic Printing Process Conditions on the Optical Density and Tonal Value Increase of Overprinted Plastic Films" Coatings 10, no. 9: 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090816

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop