Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Potential of the Er:YAG Laser for the Removal of Cemented Dust from Limestone and Painted Plaster
Previous Article in Journal
Electrochemical Properties and Chemical Oxygen Demand Depending on the Thickness of Boron-Doped Diamond
Previous Article in Special Issue
Zn-Al Layered Double Hydroxide Thin Film Fabricated by the Sputtering Method and Aqueous Solution Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/coatings10111098
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Characterization of Quinoxaline-Pyrene-Based Conjugated Copolymers for Organic Photovoltaic Devices

by
Bakhet A. Alqurashy
1,*,
Bader M. Altayeb
2,
Sulaiman Y. Alfaifi
3,
Majed Alawad
4,
Ahmed Iraqi
5 and
Imran Ali
2,6
1
Department of Basic Science and Technologies, Community Faculty, Taibah University, Al-Madina Al-Mounawara 2898, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Al-Madina Al-Mounawara 30002, Saudi Arabia
3
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 80200, Saudi Arabia
4
Material Science Research Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh 12345, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7HF, UK
6
Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi 110025, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2020, 10(11), 1098; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10111098
Submission received: 22 October 2020 / Revised: 10 November 2020 / Accepted: 12 November 2020 / Published: 16 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Functional Materials and Devices for Semiconductor and Energy Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, two novel conjugated polymers, poly(4,5,9,10-tetrakis((2-ethylhexyl)oxy]pyrene-alt-2,3-bis(3-(octyloxy)phenyl)-5,8-di(2-thienyl)-6,7-difluoroquinoxaline) (PPyQxff) and poly(4,5,9,10-tetrakis((2-ethylhexyl)oxy)pyren-alt-2,3-bis(3-(octyloxy)phenyl)-5,8-di(2-thienyl)quinoxaline) (PPyQx), consisting of quinoxaline units with and without fluorine substituents, as electron-accepting moieties and pyrene flanked with dithienyl units as electron-donating moieties were prepared via Stille polymerization reactions for use as electron donor materials in bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells. PPyQxff and PPyQx were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), cyclic voltammetry (CV), UV−VIS absorption, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. PPyQxff and PPyQx revealed excellent solution processability in common organic solvents. PPyQxff and PPyQx presented decomposition temperatures above 300 °C. The inclusion of F atoms to the quinoxaline moiety made a slight reduction in the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level, relative to the unfluorinated polymer, but had no impact on the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level. PPyQxff and PPyQx exhibited similar physical properties with strong and broad absorbance from 400 to 700 nm and an optical band-gap energy of 1.77 eV. The X-ray powder diffraction study indicated that PPyQxff possessed a reduced π–π stacking distance relative to PPyQx.

1. Introduction

High request for renewable energy sources to replace fossil fuels has prompted industrial interests and academics attention towards exploring solar energy as an alternative [1]. Commercially available photovoltaic technologies are currently dominated by inorganic solar cell technology. These are based on materials including wafer-sized, single junction crystalline silicon. They show relatively high-power conversion efficiency (PCE) (at roughly 25%) [2]. Environmental issues, manufacturing costs, and performance problems in low light level conditions do, however, present some key drawbacks to this technology [1]. Organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells have hence become the focus of research. Organic semiconductors are able to provide improved performance as compared to their inorganic counterparts. Low-cost production processes, the ease of producing large active panels, high absorption coefficients, ease of fabrication, and light weight constitute key merits in the use of organic semiconductors in this area. OPV devices displayed lower efficiencies relative to inorganic devices; however, remarkable development of organic semiconductors has been made to boost the PCE and stability of OPV devices to make them a sustainable technology [3,4,5]. Up to date, Liu et al., reported the highest PCE for organic solar cells (18.22%) [6].
BHJ solar cells based on alternating donor−acceptor (D–A) conjugate polymers provide the most effective materials for use in polymer solar cells (PSCs) [7,8,9]. The alternation of D and A moieties on polymer backbones was found to be an efficient technique in manufacturing polymers with high-performance for BHJ applications. This observation is referred to the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) amongst electron-deficient and electron-donor units within the copolymer segment, which allows adjusting of frontier molecular orbital energies, light absorption strength, and band gaps [10,11,12,13]. Lately, numerous numbers of D−A-conjugated copolymers have been manufactured and developed for photovoltaic devices applications. For instance, Li et al., developed a set of D–A copolymers based on quinoxaline and thiophene for use in photovoltaic devices. PDFQx-3T exhibited an optical band gap of 1.73 eV and efficiency as high as about 8% [14].
Quinoxaline moieties are widely employed in both OPVs and organic light emitting diode (OLEDs) as electron-accepting units [15,16,17,18]. In recent studies, semiconductor polymers based on quinoxaline units have been shown to exhibit remarkable PCEs, exceeding 11% [19]. This can be reflected in their ability to achieve the efficiency boundary of commercial applications of polymer photovoltaic devices. In a reported study conducted by Chen et al., fabricated organic photovoltaic cells using a copolymer of a fluorinated quinoxaline and BDT as the donor segment in (BHJ) arrangement has resulted in PSCs with a PCE of more than 8% [19,20]. More recently, the insertion of F substituents as the smallest electron-deficient groups to accepting units has attracted much attention, due to its effect on reducing unwanted steric interactions and enhancing the coplanarity of polymer chains [21,22]. Furthermore, fluorine substituents also improve the stability of the HOMO and LUMO energy levels because of its robust electron-affinity nature. Moreover, it leads to a better molecular order via noncovalent interactions, which promote planarization of the backbone of conjugated polymers. This results in favorably lowering of the band gap [20,22].
Among various building blocks with electron donating properties, pyrene has recently been targeted as an electron donor segment in copolymers for OPV applications [23,24]. Because of its moderate electron donating characteristic, pyrene-based copolymers should display a low HOMO level, which is advantageous in order to afford devices with high open circuit voltages (VOC) in PCSs. Furthermore, pyrene should afford resultant polymers with efficient charge transporting properties due to its rigid and planar nature. The functionalization of the pyrene moiety at its 4-,5-,9-, and 10-positions displays an efficient technique to adjust the optical and electrochemical properties of the resultant polymers as well as to enable enhanced solubility [25,26,27,28,29]. Xu et al., stated the development of a set of acceptor-donor-acceptor organic small molecules based on pyrene. Moreover, 4.19% PCE was achieved for Pyr(EH-DPP)2 as stated by the researchers [30].
The objective of the present study is to prepare novel donor−acceptor alternating polymers with broad absorption and narrow band gaps for BHJ solar cell applications. For the first time, pyrene as the donor (2,7-Bis(5-(trimethylstannyl)thiophen-2-yl)-4,5,9,10-tetrakis(2-ethylhexyloxy)-pyrene (M1)) was combined with fluorinated quinoxaline (2,3-Bis(3-(octyloxy)phenyl)-6,7-difluoro-5,8-bis(5-bromo-2-thienyl)quinoxaline (M2)) and with nonfluorinated quinoxaline (2,3-Bis(3-(octyloxy)phenyl)-5,8-bis(5-bromo-2-thienyl)quinoxaline (M3)) as the acceptors, where the two fluorine atoms on the quinoxaline moiety are substituted by two hydrogen atoms. A comparison of nonfluorinated and fluorinated quinoxaline-containing polymers was used to study the impact of fluorination on molecular and film structures, absorption wavelength, and HOMO and LUMO energy levels. PPyQxff and PPyQx exhibited broad absorption bands within the wavelength range 400–700 nm with narrow optical band gaps of 1.77 eV. The polymer with the fluorine atoms (PPyQxff) had a lower molar mass and a decreased HOMO energy level.

2. Materials and Methods

All reagents and chemicals used in preparing the polymers were obtained from commercial suppliers. The materials were used as originally receive, unless otherwise stated. For more information in regard to instrument and measurements see References [31,32].

2.1. Preparation of PPyQxff

PPyQxff was prepared by coupling 0.116 g (0.096 mmol) of M1 with 0.086 g (0.096 mmol) of M2. The two monomers were dissolved in 5 mL of anhydrous toluene and then, 2.00 mg (11 μmol) of palladium (II) acetate and 7.00 mg (23 μmol) of tri(o-toly)phosphine were added. The reaction mixture was degassed, the polymerization was undertaken under the protection of argon atmosphere, and the temperature was raised to 100 °C and left to reflux for 72 h. Then, the solution was cooled down to room temperature and concentrated and precipitated in CH3OH. The produced precipitant was collected through filtration and subjected to Soxhlet-extraction, in turn, with CH3OH, acetone, hexane, and CHCl3. The CHCl3 fraction was concentrated, and the polymer was precipitated in methanol and filtered to produce the target polymer as a purple solid (150 mg, 0.090 mmol, 55.8%). GPC results: the number-average molecular weights (Mn) = 9.8 KDa; the weigh-average molecular weighs (Mw) = 18.4 KDa; polydispersity index (PDI) = 1.88 and 1H-NMR (δH/ppm, C2D2Cl4, 100 °C, 500 MHz): 2.12–0.90 (br, 90H), 3.86 (t, 4H), 4.34 (d, 8H), 7.01 (br.d, 2H), 7.53–7.17 (br, 10H), 7.61 (br.d, 2H), 8.11 (br.d, 2H), 8.74 (br.s, 4H).

2.2. Preparation of PPyQx

PPyQx was prepared in the same method as PPyQxff, using 0.122 g (0.101 mmol) of M1, 0.087 g (0.101 mmol) of M3, 2.00 mg (11 μmol) of palladium (II) acetate, and 7.00 mg (23 μmol) of tri(o-toly)phosphine in 5 mL of toluene. The polymer was extracted in chloroform as a purple solid (136 mg, 0.097 mmol, 69.38%). GPC results: Mn = 10.8 KDa; Mw = 19.5 KDa; PDI = 1.80 and 1H-NMR (δH/ppm, C2D2Cl4, 100 °C, 500 MHz): 2.15–0.77 (br, 90H), 3.98 (t, 4H), 4.34 (d, 8H), 7.01 (br.d, 2H), 7.54–7.14 (br, 10H), 7.60 (br.d, 2H), 7.94 (br.d, 2H), 8.19 (br.d, 2H), 8.74 (br.s, 4H).

3. Results

The preparation of M1, M2, and M3 was performed according to literature procedures [24,31,32,33,34]. As shown in Scheme 1, PPyQxff and PPyQx were developed via Stille coupling polymerizations in moderate yields using a palladium (II) acetate/tri(o-tolyl) phosphine catalytic system. PPyQxff and PPyQx were purified through extraction with 300 mL of methanol, acetone, and hexane in order to get rid of small molecules such as monomers and oligomers and with chloroform to extract the final polymers. GPC was applied to value the number-average/weight-average molecular weights of PPyQxff and PPyQx using 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 140 °C as the eluent. The GPC of PPyQxff and PPyQx found to be 98/184 and 108/195 KDa with polydispersity index of 1.88 and 1.80, respectively. The slightly lower molar mass of PPyQxff in comparison to that of PPyQx is possibly as a result of the introduction of the two F substituents on the quinoxaline moieties, which leads to stronger π–π stacking and aggregation of polymer chains in solution, causing the polymer to crash out of solvent early due to fluorine sulfur interactions on neighboring polymer chains, limiting the final molar mass of the polymer. The thermal stabilities of PPyQxff and PPyQx were examined using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) under an inert N2 gas atmosphere at a heating scan rate of 10 °C per minute. As depicted in Figure 1. The thermal decomposition temperatures (95% weight residue) of PPyQxff and PPyQx were measured to be 333 and 335 °C, respectively, representing good thermal stabilities of both polymers. Both PPyQxff and PPyQx showed two decomposition phases. The first one occurred at a lower temperature of 334 °C, which can be ascribed to the cleavage of the octyl chains attached to the quinoxaline acceptor moieties. The second decomposition occurred at a temperature of 441 °C, which corresponded to the loss of the rest of the attached substituents. PPyQxff and PPyQx degraded until about 52% of their molar mass was remained, and then, the curves stayed constant.

3.1. Optical Properties

The optical properties of thin films and dilute chloroform solutions of PPyQxff and PPyQx were examined by UV–VIS absorption spectroscopy. The data are listed in Table 1. PPyQxff and PPyQx displayed similar absorption features (Figure 2). The thin films and dilute CHCl3 solutions of the two polymers exhibit similar absorption bands between 350 and 450 nm. These absorption bands are assigned to the π–π* transitions from the polymer backbones, while the absorption bands from 450 to 650 nm are assigned to the ICT between the quinoxaline and bis(thienyl)-pyrene units. The ICT absorption bands of PPyQxff and PPyQx in the thin films were red shifted (by about 40 nm) with regard to those in dilute chloroform solutions, indicating a greater chain planarity polymer chains and intermolecular π–π interactions in thin films. Previous literature reports have revealed that the insertion of F atoms to donor–acceptor polymer backbones causes the absorption peaks to be blue shifted [35,36,37]. The inclusion of F atoms to the quinoxaline-containing polymer (PPyQxff) showed a very small blue shift (around 5 nm). We believe that the low molar mass of PPyQxff is the reason for this observation. The optical band gaps of PPyQxff and PPyQx were estimated from their absorption onsets in thin film to be at around 700 nm with a band gap of 1.77 eV. The similar optical band gaps of PPyQxff and PPyQx indicate that the addition of two F atoms in PPyQxff decreased slightly its HOMO energy level with respect to that of PPyQx but not to a significant amount.

3.2. Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical properties of PPyQxff and PPyQx were studied by employing cyclic voltammetry (CV) analysis in order to evaluate their frontier molecular orbital energies. The CV studies were performed according to a previous published report [31]. Both HOMO and LUMO energy levels of PPyQxff and PPyQx were measured from their onset of reduction and oxidation potentials (Table 1 and Figure 3). The CV curves of PPyQxff and PPyQx reveal quasi-reversible oxidation and reduction behaviors. The HOMO energy level was calculated to be −5.47 eV for PPyQxff and −5.41 eV for PPyQx. The insertion of electron-deficient F atoms to the quinoxaline-based polymer led to a modest decrease in the HOMO energy level. Thereby, PPyQxff is expected to show slightly better air stability and a higher VOC value in organic photovoltaic devices than that of the PPyQx-based devices [38,39]. The reported results agree with previous literature. The LUMO energy levels of PPyQxff and PPyQx were the same and calculated to be −3.62 eV. The wider electrochemical bandgap of PPyQxff compared to that of PPyQx is assumed to be due to the influence of the F atoms on the HOMO level of PPyQxff, hence, having a decreased HOMO and an analogous LUMO in comparison to that of PPyQx.

3.3. X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD)

The crystalline properties and molecular organizations of PPyQxff and PPyQx were investigated using X-ray powder diffraction studies (XRD) (Figure 4). The XRD pattern of PPyQxff and PPyQx display poorly defined features in the small angle region at 2θ = 3.78°, which corresponds to lamellar distances around 23.4 Å for both polymers. PPyQxff showed an additional broad, diffuse peak in the wide-angle region at 2θ = 23.40°, which corresponds to π–π stacking distances of 3.8 Å. The presence of this peak for PPyQxff relative to PPyQx can be referred to the incorporation of F substituents, which could produce more intermolecular interactions between neighboring aromatic chains with F atoms. Consequently, PPyQxff should adopt a further planar structure with enhanced stacking between conjugated polymer backbones. These results clearly show that substitution of the quinoxaline repeat units with fluorine atoms leads to a better packing of polymer chains presumably through interactions between polymer chains involving fluorine substituents. Such results could have a positive effect on the charge mobility of the fluorinated polymer PPyQxff, which would have beneficial effects in its application in OPV devices.

4. Conclusions

In summary, two new narrow band gap donor-acceptor conjugated polymers have been prepared via the Stille coupling reaction. Both polymers were obtained in reasonable yields and the GPC data analysis indicated that polymers PPyQxff and PPyQx had weight average molecular weights ranging from 18,400 to 19,500 Da with polydispersity index of 1.88 and 1.80, respectively. The polymer with fluorine substituents on its quinoxaline repeat units PPyQxff, displayed a slightly lower molecular weight than the analogous polymer without fluorine substituents PPyQx as a consequence of its higher disposition to aggregation when compared to the nonfluorinated polymer. Both polymers displayed similar absorption maxima as well as similar band gaps (1.77 eV). Cyclic voltammetric studies indicated a slightly deeper HOMO level for the fluorinated polymer PPyQxff, nevertheless, both polymers had similar LUMO energy levels. X-ray powder diffraction studies on PPyQxff and PPyQx indicated a greater tendency of the fluorinated polymer PPyQxff towards chain aggregation with interchain stacking distances of 3.8 Å compared to 4.3 Å distances for the nonfluorinated polymer PPyQx. Further studies on the photovoltaic properties of the two polymers are currently underway.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A.A. and A.I.; validation, B.A.A. and A.I.; investigation, B.A.A., B.M.A., S.Y.A. and M.A.; resources, B.A.A., S.Y.A. and B.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, B.A.A., B.M.A. and M.A.; writing—review and editing, A.I. and I.A.; visualization, B.A.A. and A.I.; supervision, A.I.; project administration, A.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lu, L.; Zheng, T.; Wu, Q.; Schneider, A.M.; Zhao, D.; Yu, L. Recent advances in bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12666–12731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, E.; Wang, L.; Lan, L.; Luo, C.; Zhuang, W.; Peng, J.; Cao, Y. High-performance polymer heterojunction solar cells of a polysilafluorene derivative. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Henson, Z.B.; Müllen, K.; Bazan, G.C. Design strategies for organic semiconductors beyond the molecular formula. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dennler, G.; Scharber, M.C.; Brabec, C.J. Polymer-fullerene bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1323–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ameri, T.; Khoram, P.; Min, J.; Brabec, C.J. Organic ternary solar cells: A review. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4245–4266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Jin, K.; Qin, J.; Xu, J.; Li, W.; Xiong, J.; Liu, J. 18% Efficiency organic solar cells. Sci. Bull. 2020, 65, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kitamura, C.; Tanaka, S.; Yamashita, Y. Design of narrow-bandgap polymers. Syntheses and properties of monomers and polymers containing aromatic-donor and o-quinoid-acceptor units. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Price, S.C.; Stuart, A.C.; Yang, L.; Zhou, H.; You, W. Fluorine substituted conjugated polymer of medium band gap yields 7% efficiency in polymer-fullerene solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 4625–4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, H.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Liu, C.C.; Chien, Y.C.; Chou, S.W.; Chou, P.T. Prominent short-circuit currents of fluorinated quinoxaline-based copolymer solar cells with a power conversion efficiency of 8.0%. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 4766–4772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bronstein, H.; Frost, J.M.; Hadipour, A.; Kim, Y.; Nielsen, C.B.; Ashraf, R.S.; Rand, B.P.; Watkins, S.; McCulloch, I. Effect of fluorination on the properties of a donor-acceptor copolymer for use in photovoltaic cells and transistors. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duan, R.; Ye, L.; Guo, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, J.; Huo, L.; Hou, J. Application of two-dimensional conjugated benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b’]dithiophene in quinoxaline-based photovoltaic polymers. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 3032–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chochos, C.L.; Choulis, S.A. How the structural deviations on the backbone of conjugated polymers influence their optoelectronic properties and photovoltaic performance. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1326–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, N.; Chen, Z.; Wei, W.; Jiang, Z. Fluorinated benzothiadiazole-based conjugated polymers for high-performance polymer solar cells without any processing additives or post-treatments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17060–17068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alqurashy, B.A.; Li, Y.; Ko, S.J.; Park, S.Y.; Choi, H.; Nguyen, T.L.; Uddin, M.A.; Kim, T.; Hwang, S.; Kim, J.Y.; et al. Quinoxaline–thiophene based thick photovoltaic devices with an efficiency of ~8%. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9967–9976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Günes, S.; Neugebauer, H.; Sariciftci, N.S. Conjugated polymer-based organic solar cells. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Reddy, M.R.; Han, S.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Seo, S.Y. Synthesis and characterization of quinoxaline derivative for high performance phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes. Dye. Pigment. 2018, 153, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, D.W.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Park, S.Y. Novel quinoxaline-based organic sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3880–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, E.; Hou, L.; Wang, Z.; Hellström, S.; Zhang, F.; Inganäs, O.; Andersson, M.R. An easily synthesized blue polymer for high-performance polymer solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 5240–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, M.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, L. Quinoxaline-based conjugated polymers for polymer solar cells. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 4613–4636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dang, D.; Chen, W.; Yang, R.; Zhu, W.; Mammo, W.; Wang, E. Fluorine substitution enhanced photovoltaic performance of a D-A 1-D-A2 copolymer. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9335–9337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Liu, D.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, S.; Ye, L.; Zheng, Z.; Cui, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hou, J. Highly efficient photovoltaic polymers based on benzodithiophene and quinoxaline with deeper HOMO levels. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 5172–5178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, B.; Wu, H.; Liu, S.; Luo, G.; Wang, W.; Guo, Z.; Wei, W.; Gao, C.; An, Z. Efficient alternating polymer based on benzodithiophene and di-fluorinated quinoxaline derivatives for bulk heterojunction photovoltaic cells. Polymer (Guildf). 2017, 116, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, N.; Bao, X.; Yan, Y.; Ouyang, D.; Sun, M.; Roy, V.A.L.; Lee, C.S.; Yang, R. Synthesis and photovoltaic properties of conjugated D-A copolymers based on thienyl substituted pyrene and diketopyrrolopyrrole for polymer solar cells. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 3198–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alqurashy, B.A. Preparation and physical characterization of pyrene and pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4-dione-based copolymers. ChemistryOpen 2019, 8, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Merz, J.; Dietz, M.; Vonhausen, Y.; Wöber, F.; Friedrich, A.; Sieh, D.; Krummenacher, I.; Braunschweig, H.; Moos, M.; Holzapfel, M.; et al. Synthesis, photophysical and electronic properties of new red-to-NIR emitting donor–Acceptor pyrene derivatives. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 438–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Figueira-Duarte, T.M.; Müllen, K. Pyrene-based materials for organic electronics. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7260–7314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zöphel, L.; Beckmann, D.; Enkelmann, V.; Chercka, D.; Rieger, R.; Müllen, K. Asymmetric pyrene derivatives for organic field-effect transistors. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6960–6962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cai, G.; Xue, P.; Chen, Z.; Li, T.; Liu, K.; Ma, W.; Lian, J.; Zeng, P.; Wang, Y.; Han, R.P.S.; et al. High-performance mid-bandgap fused-pyrene electron acceptor. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 6484–6490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, S.Y.; Liu, W.Q.; Xu, J.Q.; Fan, C.C.; Fu, W.F.; Ling, J.; Wu, J.Y.; Shi, M.M.; Jen, A.K.Y.; Chen, H.Z. Pyrene and diketopyrrolopyrrole-based oligomers synthesized via direct arylation for OSC applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 6765–6775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, S.; Ling, J.; Mai, J.; Lu, X.; Li, C.; Jen, A.K.; Chen, H. A-D-A small molecule donors based on pyrene and diketopyrrolopyrrole for organic solar cells. Sci. China Chem. 2017, 60, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alqurashy, B.A.; Cartwright, L.; Iraqi, A.; Zhang, Y.; Lidzey, D.G. Pyrene–benzothiadiazole-based copolymers for application in photovoltaic devices. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2017, 28, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Alqurashy, B.A.; Iraqi, A.; Zhang, Y.; Lidzey, D.G. Preparation and photovoltaic properties of pyrene-thieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione-based donor-acceptor polymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 85, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Park, S.M.; Yoon, Y.; Jeon, C.W.; Kim, H.; Ko, M.J.; Lee, D.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Son, H.J.; Kwon, S.K.; Kim, Y.H.; et al. Synthesis of phenanthro[1,10,9,8-cdefg]carbazole-based conjugated polymers for organic solar cell applications. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dang, D.; Xiao, M.; Zhou, P.; Shi, J.; Tao, Q.; Tan, H.; Wang, Y.; Bao, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, E.; et al. Manipulating backbone structure with various conjugated spacers to enhance photovoltaic performance of D-A-type two-dimensional copolymers. Org. Electron. 2014, 15, 2876–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. You, J.; Dou, L.; Yoshimura, K.; Kato, T.; Ohya, K.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Chen, C.C.; Gao, J.; Li, G.; et al. A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Chien, S.C.; Chen, K.S.; Yip, H.L.; Sun, Y.; Davies, J.A.; Chen, F.C.; Jen, A.K.Y. Increased open circuit voltage in fluorinated benzothiadiazole-based alternating conjugated polymers. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11026–11028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kroon, R.; Gehlhaar, R.; Steckler, T.T.; Henriksson, P.; Müller, C.; Bergqvist, J.; Hadipour, A.; Heremans, P.; Andersson, M.R. New quinoxaline and pyridopyrazine-based polymers for solution-processable photovoltaics. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 105, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, J.; Yun, M.H.; Kim, G.H.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.M.; Ko, S.J.; Kim, Y.; Dutta, G.K.; Moon, M.; Park, S.Y.; et al. Synthesis of PCDTBT-based fluorinated polymers for high open-circuit voltage in organic photovoltaics: Towards an understanding of relationships between polymer energy levels engineering and ideal morphology control. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 7523–7534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y. Insight into high-performance conjugated polymers for organic field-effect transistors. Chem 2018, 4, 2748–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Coatings 10 01098 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of PPyQxff and PPyQx.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of PPyQxff and PPyQx.
Coatings 10 01098 sch001
Coatings 10 01098 g001 550
Figure 1. TGA curves of (PPyQxff) and (PPyQx).
Figure 1. TGA curves of (PPyQxff) and (PPyQx).
Coatings 10 01098 g001
Coatings 10 01098 g002 550
Figure 2. CHCl3 solutions (a) and thin films (b) UV–VIS absorption spectra of PPyQxff and PPyQx.
Figure 2. CHCl3 solutions (a) and thin films (b) UV–VIS absorption spectra of PPyQxff and PPyQx.
Coatings 10 01098 g002
Coatings 10 01098 g003 550
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry curves of PPyQxff and PPyQx.
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry curves of PPyQxff and PPyQx.
Coatings 10 01098 g003
Coatings 10 01098 g004 550
Figure 4. XRD patterns of PPyQxff and PPyQx.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of PPyQxff and PPyQx.
Coatings 10 01098 g004
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of (PPyQxff) and (PPyQx).
Table 1. Characteristics of (PPyQxff) and (PPyQx).
PolymersMn (Da) aMw (Da) aPDIλmax (nm)Eg opt (eV) bHOMO (eV) cLUMO (eV) cEg ele (eV) d
SolutionFilm
PPyQxff980018,4001.88366, 418, 530367, 433, 5651.77−5.47−3.621.85
PPyQx10,80019,5001.80366, 418, 530367, 437, 5701.77−5.41−3.621.78
a Measured by GPC; b Optical bandgap (Eg opt); c Measured by cyclic voltammetry; d Electrochemical band gap (Eg ele).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alqurashy, B.A.; Altayeb, B.M.; Alfaifi, S.Y.; Alawad, M.; Iraqi, A.; Ali, I. Preparation and Characterization of Quinoxaline-Pyrene-Based Conjugated Copolymers for Organic Photovoltaic Devices. Coatings 2020, 10, 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10111098

AMA Style

Alqurashy BA, Altayeb BM, Alfaifi SY, Alawad M, Iraqi A, Ali I. Preparation and Characterization of Quinoxaline-Pyrene-Based Conjugated Copolymers for Organic Photovoltaic Devices. Coatings. 2020; 10(11):1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10111098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alqurashy, Bakhet A., Bader M. Altayeb, Sulaiman Y. Alfaifi, Majed Alawad, Ahmed Iraqi, and Imran Ali. 2020. "Preparation and Characterization of Quinoxaline-Pyrene-Based Conjugated Copolymers for Organic Photovoltaic Devices" Coatings 10, no. 11: 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10111098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop