Next Article in Journal
Impact of Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns on Susceptibilities of Uropathogens in Children below 24 Months Old
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrodecoration and Characterization of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Bioactive Synergistic Nanocopper: Magnetic Hyperthermia-Induced Ionic Release for Anti-Biofilm Action
Previous Article in Journal
Antibiofilm Activity of Heather and Manuka Honeys and Antivirulence Potential of Some of Their Constituents on the DsbA1 Enzyme of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stress-Based High-Throughput Screening Assays to Identify Inhibitors of Cell Envelope Biogenesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Activities and Inoculum Effects of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates from South Korea

1
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Nowon Eulji University Hospital, Seoul 01830, Korea
2
Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
3
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(12), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120912
Submission received: 24 November 2020 / Revised: 12 December 2020 / Accepted: 14 December 2020 / Published: 15 December 2020

Abstract

:
Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and aztreonam-avibactam (AZT-AVI) are novel antibiotic combinations active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate their in vitro activities and inoculum effects in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), including carbapenemase-producing (CP)-CRE and non-CP-CRE. A total of 81 independent clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were collected. CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were evaluated by broth microdilution using standard and high inocula. The inoculum effect was defined as an ≥8-fold increase in MIC with high inoculum. Phenotypic determination of β-lactam resistance mechanism and PCR for carbapenemase genes were performed. Of the 81 CRE isolates, 35 (43%) were CP-CRE. Overall, 73% of the isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI, and 95% had low AZT-AVI MICs (≤8 µg/mL). The MIC50/MIC90s of CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI were 4/≥512 µg/mL and 0.5/4 µg/mL, respectively. CAZ-AVI was more active against non-CP-CRE than against CP-CRE (susceptibility 80% vs. 63%, p = 0.08; MIC50/MIC90, 2/16 μg/mL vs. 4/≥512 μg/mL), whereas AZT-AVI was more active against CP-CRE (MIC50/MIC90, 0.25/1 μg/mL vs. 0.5/8 μg/mL). All four isolates with high AZT-AVI MIC (≥16 μg/mL) were resistant to CAZ-AVI, but only 18% (4/22) of CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates had high AZT-AVI MIC. The rates of the inoculum effect for CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI were 18% and 47%, respectively (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the frequency of the AZT-AVI inoculum effect was higher in K. pneumoniae than E. coli (64% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). AZT-AVI is more active against CRE than CAZ-AVI, even in CP-CRE and CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates. The presence of a substantial inoculum effect may contribute to clinical failure in high-inoculum infections treated with AZT-AVI.

1. Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) challenge pharmaceutical chemists and clinicians on account of their difficult-to-treat resistance and increasing global prevalence [1]. Due to the limited therapeutic options for CRE infections, the polymyxins (colistin and polymyxin B) are frequently used as last resort drugs. However, their high rates of nephrotoxicity, which range from 30% to 60%, make their use problematic [2]. Avibactam, a new non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, is an inhibitor of class A β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs), and also class C (AmpC) and some class D (OXA-48) β-lactamases [3]. Ceftazidime-avibactam shows promising activity against CRE strains, such as KPC-producing K. pneumoniae and Escherichia coli [4]. However, ceftazidime-avibactam is usually not active against class B metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing CRE [4]. After the introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam into clinical use, cases of resistance due to various mechanisms have been increasingly reported [5].
Aztreonam, a monobactam, is unique among currently used β-lactams, in that it is stable to hydrolysis by MBLs [6]. However, it is easily inactivated by ESBLs, AmpC, and KPCs. When combined with avibactam, aztreonam can inhibit cell wall synthesis in MBL-producing bacteria, despite the presence of co-carried β-lactamases such as ESBLs and AmpC [7]. Thus, aztreonam-avibactam can be more effective than ceftazidime-avibactam against MBL-producing strains. However, there are limited data on the susceptibility of aztreonam-avibactam to CRE. In addition, β-lactam antibiotics, especially β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, are known to display an inoculum effect of variable severity against Gram-negative bacteria. The inoculum effect is a laboratory phenomenon described as a significant increase in the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of an antibiotic when the number of bacteria inoculated increases [8]. Reduced in vitro activity of the β-lactams against a dense bacterial population is commonly attributed to the presence of a high level of β-lactamase. In a clinical situation involving a high bacterial burden, such as an abscess, the inoculum effect may lead to treatment failure.
This study aimed to compare the in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam and their inoculum effects in carbapenemase-producing (CP-CRE) and non-CP-CRE isolates. It also examined the relationship of their in vitro activities and inoculum effects to the carbapenem resistance mechanisms of the target bacteria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Isolates and Study Design

Carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from consecutive patients who had no prior exposure to ceftazidime-avibactam or aztreonam-avibactam at Asan Medical Center, a 2700-bed tertiary care center in Seoul, South Korea. A total of 81 carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates (25 and 56 isolates, respectively) were collected from January 2014 to October 2018. Only the first CRE isolate from each patient was included in the study. Species identification and initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with a MicroScan Walk-Away plus System using a Neg Combo Panel Type 72 (Dade Behring Inc., West Sacramento, CA, USA). CRE isolates, defined as those resistant to meropenem or imipenem (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) [9,10], were stored at −80 °C. They were streaked on an agar plates and incubated 24 h before experiments. The composition of the study isolates by specimen source was as follows: blood stream, n = 57 (70.4% of all isolates tested), intra-abdominal, n = 9 (11.1%), urinary tract, n = 7 (8.6%), respiratory tract, n = 5 (6.2%), and soft tissue, n = 3 (3.7%).

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and the Inoculum Effect

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for ceftazidime, aztreonam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem, colistin, and tigecycline was performed in triplicate using standard broth microdilution [9,11]. Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/mL. MICs were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints for all antimicrobial agents except for those for which CLSI breakpoints are not yet available [9]: aztreonam-avibactam, for which clinical breakpoints have not yet been assigned and tigecycline and colistin, for which the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) MIC breakpoints were applied [12]. To determine whether there was an inoculum effect with ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, and meropenem, the MICs of each antibiotic with high inocula (1 × 107 CFU/mL) were compared to those with standard inocula (1 × 105 CFU/mL) [13,14]. Our definition of an inoculum effect was an 8-fold or greater MIC increase in testing with the high inoculum [8,15]. As MIC values > 256 μg/mL for ceftazidime-avibactam were not further examined, the presence of the inoculum effect for such isolates was not determined. E. coli ATCC 25922 and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 were used as quality control strains for each test. All results determined with these strains were within the CLSI quality control ranges. Ceftazidime, aztreonam, meropenem, tigecycline, and colistin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and avibactam was obtained from AdooQ Bioscience (Irvine, CA, USA).

2.3. Basis of Resistance and Molecular Identification of β-Lactamase Genes

The carbapenem resistance mechanisms of each isolate were examined to determine the impact of resistance mechanisms on antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and the inoculum effect. The modified carbapenem inactivation method, with high sensitivity and specificity, was used to confirm carbapenemase production in all the study CRE isolates [16]. For the carbapenemase-producing (CP) isolates, PCR was used to amplify carbapenemase genes (blaKPC, blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48-like) according to the procedures described in previous studies [17,18,19]. Non-carbapenemase-producing (non-CP) isolates usually acquire carbapenem resistance by the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and/or AmpC cephalosporinase (AmpC) in conjunction with membrane impermeability or active drug efflux. To identify the β-lactamase types among the non-CP-CRE, the presence of ESBL was determined by the MicroScan ESBL detection test (included in Neg Combo Panel Type 72) using cefotaxime and ceftazidime alone and in combination with clavulanic acid. For isolates not confirmed by the MicroScan ESBL detection test, the double-disk synergy test was performed in addition, using cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), and amoxicillin plus clavulanate (20 μg and 10 μg each) disks [20,21]. As non-susceptibility to cefoxitin (MIC >8 μg/mL) is considered a surrogate marker for the presence of high-level production of AmpC, isolates non-susceptible to cefoxitin were further characterized by the AmpC confirmatory test using cefoxitin and cloxacillin [22,23]. Cefepime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disk were purchased from Bio-rad (Hercules, CA, USA), and cefoxitin disks were obtained from Oxoid (Basingstoke, UK).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Differences between groups were analyzed using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS version 24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used in the statistical analyses.

3. Results

Out of the 81 CRE isolates collected, 25 (31%) were E. coli, and 56 (69%) were K. pneumoniae. Of these 81 isolates, 35 (43%) were CP-CRE; they consisted of 7 E. coli and 28 K. pneumoniae isolates, of which 17 had KPC and 11 had New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM). Among ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam, and the comparator antimicrobial agents, aztreonam-avibactam had an overall MIC50/MIC90 of 0.5/4 μg/mL and was the antimicrobial with the highest activity against the CRE isolates (Supplemental Table S1). Since breakpoint criteria have not been defined for aztreonam-avibactam, we stratified the aztreonam-avibactam MICs of isolates as low (≤8 µg/mL) vs. high MIC (≥16 µg/mL). Ninety-five percent of the isolates had low aztreonam-avibactam MICs. The percentage susceptibilities to ceftazidime-avibactam, colistin, and tigecycline were 73% (MIC50/MIC90, 4/≥512 μg/mL), 86% (MIC50/MIC90, 0.5/8 μg/mL), and 25% (MIC50/MIC90, 2/8 μg/mL), respectively. Comparison of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains is shown in Table 1. Most of the tigecycline-resistant isolates and colistin-resistant isolates were K. pneumoniae. For both ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam, the K. pneumoniae isolates tended to have lower MICs than the E. coli isolates.
Whether a strain was resistant to colistin or tigecycline did not affect its susceptibilities to ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam (Supplemental Table S2). Aztreonam-avibactam was active against over 90% of the colistin-resistant and/or tigecycline-resistant strains. When the MIC distributions of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam were compared, of the 22 isolates resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam, only 18% (4/22) had high aztreonam-avibactam MICs (≥16 µg/mL). In contrast, all four isolates with high aztreonam-avibactam MICs were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (Supplemental Table S3).
When high inocula were used, the MIC50 of ceftazidime-avibactam increased from 4 to 8 μg/mL, and its MIC90 was ≥512 μg/mL, while those of aztreonam-avibactam increased from 0.5 to 4 μg/mL and from 4 to 256 μg/mL, respectively. Hence, 42% of CRE isolates became resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam with high inocula and 44% of the isolates exhibited high aztreonam-avibactam MICs (≥16 μg/mL) (Supplemental Table S1). The rates of the inoculum effect for ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam were 18% and 47%, respectively (p < 0.001). K. pneumoniae isolates had a markedly higher rate of aztreonam-avibactam inoculum effects than E. coli (64% vs. 8%, p < 0.001) (Figure 1 and Table 2).
As shown in Table 3, the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC50 and MIC90 values against 46 non-CP-CRE isolates were 2 and 16 µg/mL, respectively. The ESBL test was positive in 80.4% (37/46) of these isolates, and AmpC β-lactamase in 19.6% (9/46). The ceftazidime-avibactam MIC50/MIC90 values of the CP-CRE isolates (n = 35) were 4/≥512 µg/mL, higher than those of the non-CP-CRE. Among the CP-CRE, isolates harboring NDM were mostly resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Unlike for ceftazidime-avibactam, the CP-CRE isolates exhibited lower MIC50/MIC90 values than the non-CP-CRE isolates for aztreonam-avibactam (0.25/1 µg/mL vs. 0.5/8 µg/mL) and there was no difference in MIC between isolates harboring KPC and NDM carbapenemases. The distribution of the resistance mechanisms of the study isolates, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and their rates of the inoculum effect stratified by resistance mechanism in each species, are shown in Supplemental Tables S4 and S5. The majority (72%) of carbapenem-resistant E. coli did not harbor carbapenemases, and most carried ESBLs. The inoculum effect for both ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam was more common in CP E. coli isolates than non-CP E. coli isolates. In K. pneumoniae, non-CP isolates and CP isolates were evenly distributed, and KPC was the most prevalent (54%) carbapenemase. In contrast to E. coli, non-CP K. pneumoniae isolates were significantly more likely to show the inoculum effect for ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam than CP K. pneumoniae isolates (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively).

4. Discussion

In the present study, ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 73% of CRE isolates, and aztreonam-avibactam had a low MIC (≤8 µg/mL) against 95% of the CRE isolates. In total, 43% of the study isolates were CP-CRE isolates, of which 34% harbored MBL. Unlike ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam was less active against non-CP-CRE isolates than against CP-CRE isolates. The inoculum effect was more consistently detected with aztreonam-avibactam than with ceftazidime-avibactam, especially in K. pneumoniae isolates. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam together with evaluating the inoculum effect against CRE isolates encompassing CP-CRE and non-CP CRE.
Our data suggest that aztreonam-avibactam may be more active than ceftazidime-avibactam against CRE strains. This result is similar to previous reports that found lower MIC50/MIC90 values for aztreonam-avibactam than for ceftazidime-avibactam against Gram-negative bacilli [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, those studies included only CP-CRE, either alone or along with non-CRE. To date, ceftazidime-avibactam stands out as one of the most important additions to the antimicrobial armamentarium, as it is the first marketed fixed combination with activity against CRE, including those with the OXA and KPC enzymes [4,31]. Notably, avibactam cannot inhibit MBL, and nor can any other new β-lactamase inhibitor such as vaborbactam and relebactam [29,32]. Aztreonam, a monobactam, is stable to MBL [33]. In previous studies, aztreonam, in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam or avibactam, showed promising activity against MBL in Enterobacterales [7,34,35]. Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Qualified Infectious Disease Product and Fast Track designation to aztreonam-avibactam for CRE infections in November 2019, further efforts to place aztreonam-avibactam in the right position to combat against CRE are critical. Recently, a Chinese study assessed the in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against 58 CRE isolates, including both CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE [36]. In that study, the non-CP-CRE (n = 14) had lower aztreonam-avibactam MICs than the CP-CRE. However, in our hands, aztreonam-avibactam was less active against non-CP-CRE (n = 46), than CP-CRE. In addition, an aztreonam-avibactam inoculum effect was more common in the non-CP-CRE. Some differences in the species composition of study isolates and/or molecular epidemiology may have caused different results between the two studies. Further study of more CRE isolates is needed to confirm these findings. Our data showed that the K. pneumoniae isolates were more resistant to colistin or tigecycline than the E. coli isolates, but they tended to have lower MICs for both ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam. A between-species comparison of antimicrobial activity could also be helpful in the management of CRE infection.
In this study, aztreonam-avibactam had a higher rate of inoculum effects than ceftazidime-avibactam (47% and 18%, respectively), particularly in K. pneumoniae isolates. Given the growing body of concern over the high mortality and rapid dissemination of CRE infection, it is surprising that no studies have explored the inoculum effects of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam—the two essential therapeutic options—in CRE isolates. Whether the inoculum effect is clinically significant remains debatable [8,37,38]. In the era of carbapenem-resistance driven in large by a broader β-lactamase repertoire, the bacterial inoculum can reduce the activity of antimicrobial agents, particularly for β-lactam/β-lactamase combination drugs. Based on our data, aztreonam-avibactam may fail in the treatment of high-inoculum infections caused by CRE. Considering this, the susceptibility breakpoint for aztreonam-avibactam against CRE should be set at <8 µg/mL, although more clinical evidence is needed.
Our study has several limitations. First, the possibility of resistance mechanisms other than carbapenemase co-existing in the CPE isolates were not examined. Thus, we did not assess the entire resistance mechanism-specific impact on antimicrobial susceptibility in an ideal manner. Second, of the members of the Enterobacterales, we selectively collected E. coli and K. pneumoniae species, and the species mainly harboring intrinsic AmpC β-lactamases were not included. Further studies of these species are warranted. Additionally, ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam have not been in clinical use in South Korea so the absence of prior exposure to these antimicrobial agents may have affected the MIC values of these two agents and resistance rates. Despite these limitations, the in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against the CRE isolates in our study are consistent with previous CP-CRE reports based on extensive epidemiologic data. Moreover, this study provided data for non-CP-CRE, for which there has been less reliable clinical data than for CP-CRE. Future studies to determine the optimal dosing and breakpoints of aztreonam-avibactam, and the benefit of combination therapy are warranted.
Ceftazidime-avibactam has been considered a reasonable option for the treatment of CRE infection. In this study, aztreonam-avibactam was more active against CRE than ceftazidime-avibactam, even for CP-CRE and ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates. Currently available data may render aztreonam-avibactam a “game changer” in the treatment of difficult-to-treat Gram-negative organisms of various resistance mechanisms, including MBL. However, aztreonam-avibactam is not a one-size-fits-all option. The presence of the substantial inoculum effect may contribute to clinical failure in patients treated with aztreonam-avibactam for high inoculum CRE infections.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/12/912/s1, Table S1: Antimicrobial susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates to seven antimicrobial agents, Table S2: Ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam MIC distribution according to meropenem, colistin and tigecycline susceptibility pattern in carbapenem-resistant isolates, Table S3: MIC distributions of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam for carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae, Table S4: Resistance mechanisms of carbapenem-resistant E. coli (n = 25) and K. pneumoniae, Table S5: Antimicrobial susceptibility and positive rate of inoculum effect of carbapenem-resistant isolates according to resistance mechanism.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.K. and Y.P.C.; methodology, S.C.L.; formal analysis, T.K.; investigation, S.C.L. and M.B.; resources, H.S. and M.-N.K.; data curation, J.J. and M.J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.K. and Y.P.C.; supervision, S.-O.L., S.-H.C. and Y.S.K.; funding acquisition, Y.P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI17C2052).

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Eun Sil Kim, Hee Sueng Kim, and Su-jin Park for supporting the data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Logan, L.K.; Weinstein, R.A. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: The impact and evolution of a global menace. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, S28–S36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Akajagbor, D.S.; Wilson, S.L.; Shere-Wolfe, K.D.; Dakum, P.; Charurat, M.E.; Gilliam, B.L. Higher incidence of acute kidney injury with intravenous colistimethate sodium compared with polymyxin B in critically ill patients at a tertiary care medical center. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1300–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ehmann, D.E.; Jahic, H.; Ross, P.L.; Gu, R.F.; Hu, J.; Durand-Réville, T.F.; Lahiri, S.; Thresher, J.; Livchak, S.; Gao, N.; et al. Kinetics of avibactam inhibition against class A, C, and D β-lactamases. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 27960–27971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sader, H.S.; Castanheira, M.; Shortridge, D.; Mendes, R.E.; Flamm, R.K. Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam tested against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from U.S. medical centers, 2013 to 2016. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Coppi, M.; Di Pilato, V.; Monaco, F.; Giani, T.; Conaldi, P.G.; Rossolini, G.M. Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance associated with increased blaKPC-3 gene copy number mediated by pKpQIL plasmid derivatives in sequence Type 258 Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01816-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, W.; Feng, Y.; Tang, G.; Qiao, F.; McNally, A.; Zong, Z. NDM metallo-β-lactamases and their bacterial producers in health care settings. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00115-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Marshall, S.; Hujer, A.M.; Rojas, L.J.; Papp-Wallace, K.M.; Humphries, R.M.; Spellberg, B.; Hujer, K.M.; Marshall, E.K.; Rudin, S.D.; Perez, F.; et al. Can ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam overcome beta-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lenhard, J.R.; Bulman, Z.P. Inoculum effect of beta-lactam antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 2825–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 11th ed.; CLSI supplement M07; Wayne, P.A., Ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institue: Annapolis Junction, MD, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sader, H.S.; Flamm, R.K.; Carvalhaes, C.G.; Castanheira, M. Comparison of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam in vitro activities when tested against gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients hospitalized with pneumonia in United States medical centers (2017–2018). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 96, 114833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 29th ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; Wayne, P.A., Ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institue: Annapolis Junction, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters; Version 9.0.; European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Växjö, Sweden, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kang, C.I.; Pai, H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, H.B.; Kim, E.C.; Oh, M.D.; Choe, K.-W. Cefepime and the inoculum effect in tests with Klebsiella pneumoniae producing plasmid-mediated AmpC-type beta-lactamase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 54, 1130–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chong, Y.P.; Park, S.J.; Kim, E.S.; Bang, K.M.; Kim, M.N.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, S.-O.; Choi, S.-H.; Jeong, J.-Y.; Woo, J.H.; et al. Prevalence of blaZ gene types and the cefazolin inoculum effect among methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates and their association with multilocus sequence types and clinical outcome. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 34, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Thomson, K.S.; Moland, E.S. Cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and the inoculum effect in tests with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 3548–3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Pierce, V.M.; Simner, P.J.; Lonsway, D.R.; Roe-Carpenter, D.E.; Johnson, J.K.; Brasso, W.B.; Bobenchik, A.M.; Lockett, Z.C.; Charnot-Katsikas, A.; Ferraro, M.J.; et al. Modified carbapenem inactivation method for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production among Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 2321–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Dallenne, C.; Da Costa, A.; Decre, D.; Favier, C.; Arlet, G. Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Du, X.-X.; Wang, J.-F.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, F.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.-P.; Yu, Y.-S. Genetic characteristics of blaNDM-1-positive plasmid in Citrobacter freundii isolate separated from a clinical infectious patient. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 1332–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Manning, N.; Balabanian, G.; Rose, M.; Landman, D.; Quale, J. Activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, including KPC-carrying isolates, endemic to New York City. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tzelepi, E.; Giakkoupi, P.; Sofianou, D.; Loukova, V.; Kemeroglou, A.; Tsakris, A. Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in clinical isolates of Enterobacter cloacae and Enterobacter aerogenes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Paterson, D.L.; Bonomo, R.A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: A clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 657–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Jacoby, G.A. AmpC β-Lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Tan, T.Y.; Ng, L.S.; He, J.; Koh, T.H.; Hsu, L.Y. Evaluation of screening methods to detect plasmid-mediated AmpC in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Z.; Nichols, W.W.; Testa, R.; Li, H.; Chen, H.; He, W.; Wang, Q.; et al. In vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against 372 gram-negative bacilli collected in 2011 and 2012 from 11 teaching hospitals in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1774–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Alm, R.A.; Johnstone, M.R.; Lahiri, S.D. Characterization of Escherichia coli NDM isolates with decreased susceptibility to aztreonam/avibactam: Role of a novel insertion in PBP3. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 1420–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Li, H.; Estabrook, M.; Jacoby, G.A.; Nichols, W.W.; Testa, R.T.; Bush, K. In vitro susceptibility of characterized beta-lactamase-producing strains tested with avibactam combinations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 1789–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Papp-Wallace, K.M.; Bajaksouzian, S.; Abdelhamed, A.M.; Foster, A.N.; Winkler, M.L.; Gatta, J.A.; Nichols, W.W.; Testa, R.; Bonomo, R.A.; Jacobs, M.R. Activities of ceftazidime, ceftaroline, and aztreonam alone and combined with avibactam against isogenic Escherichia coli strains expressing selected single beta-lactamases. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 82, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yoshizumi, A.; Ishii, Y.; Aoki, K.; Testa, R.; Nichols, W.W.; Tateda, K. In vitro susceptibility of characterized beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria isolated in Japan to ceftazidime-, ceftaroline-, and aztreonam-avibactam combinations. J. Infect. Chemother. 2015, 21, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Livermore, D.M.; Mushtaq, S.; Warner, M.; Zhang, J.; Maharjan, S.; Doumith, M.; Woodford, N. Activities of NXL104 combinations with ceftazidime and aztreonam against carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Dupont, H.; Gaillot, O.; Goetgheluck, A.S.; Plassart, C.; Emond, J.P.; Lecuru, M.; Gaillard, N.; Derdouri, S.; Lemaire, B.; De Courtilles, M.G.; et al. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-nonsusceptible enterobacterial isolates collected during a prospective interregional survey in France and susceptibility to the novel ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam combinations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Galani, I.; Karaiskos, I.; Karantani, I.; Papoutsaki, V.; Maraki, S.; Papaioannou, V.; Kazila, P.; Tsorlini, H.; Charalampaki, N.; Toutouza, M.; et al. Epidemiology and resistance phenotypes of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Greece, 2014 to 2016. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23, 1700775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Suay-Garcia, B.; Perez-Gracia, M.T. Present and future of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Infections. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Queenan, A.M.; Bush, K. Carbapenemases: The versatile beta-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 440–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Jayol, A.; Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L.; Dubois, V. Ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with aztreonam against colistin-resistant and carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 542–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sader, H.S.; Mendes, R.E.; Pfaller, M.A.; Shortridge, D.; Flamm, R.K.; Castanheira, M. Antimicrobial activities of aztreonam-avibactam and comparator agents against contemporary (2016) Clinical Enterobacteriaceae Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01856-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zou, H.; Xiong, S.J.; Lin, Q.X.; Wu, M.L.; Niu, S.Q.; Huang, S.F. CP-CRE/non-CP-CRE stratification and CRE resistance mechanism determination help in better managing CRE bacteremia using ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 3017–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Brook, I. Inoculum effect. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1989, 11, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Harada, Y.; Morinaga, Y.; Kaku, N.; Nakamura, S.; Uno, N.; Hasegawa, H.; Izumikawa, K.; Kohno, S.; Yanagihara, K. In vitro and in vivo activities of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem at different inoculum sizes of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, O831–O839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. MIC changes (folds) with high inoculum for carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae of (top) ceftazidime-avibactam and (bottom) aztreonam-avibactam.
Figure 1. MIC changes (folds) with high inoculum for carbapenem-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae of (top) ceftazidime-avibactam and (bottom) aztreonam-avibactam.
Antibiotics 09 00912 g001
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant E. coli (n = 25) and K. pneumoniae (n = 56) isolates to seven antimicrobial agents.
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant E. coli (n = 25) and K. pneumoniae (n = 56) isolates to seven antimicrobial agents.
SpeciesAntimicrobial
Agent
Inoculum
Size
Cumulative% of Isolates with Indicated MICs (μg/mL)MIC (μg/mL)S a
0.060.1250.250.51248163264128256≥512MIC50MIC90
Non-CP-E. coli (18)CAZStandard 5.6 11.1 16.738.9100≥512≥5125.6
High 5.6 11.1100≥512≥5120
CAZ-AVIStandard 16.750.066.777.894.4 10021677.8
High 16.738.950.072.283.388.9 1004≥51272.2
ATMStandard 5.6 22.2 27.8100≥512≥5120
High 5.6 11.1100≥512≥5120
ATM-AVIStandard5.6 33.355.661.1 77.888.9 94.4 100 0.532NA b
High 5.627.850.0 61.177.883.3 88.9 94.41000.5256NA
MEMStandard 5.6 16.722.227.866.788.9100 83216.7
High 5.611.122.227.861.183.394.4100 83211.1
CSTStandard 55.694.4 100 0.250.594.4
TGCStandard 11.138.966.783.388.9 94.4100 0.51666.7
CP-E. coli (7)CAZStandard 14.3 28.6100≥512≥5120
High 28.6100≥512≥5120
CAZ-AVIStandard 28.6 42.9 100≥512≥51242.9
High 14.3 28.642.9 100≥512≥51242.9
ATMStandard 14.328.6 42.957.1100256≥51228.6
High 14.328.6 42.9100≥512≥51228.6
ATM-AVIStandard28.6 57.171.485.7100 0.252NA
High 14.328.642.957.185.7 100 132NA
MEMStandard 14.3 28.642.9 71.485.7100 c 642560
High 14.328.657.1 100 c 32≥2560
CSTStandard 14.3100 0.50.5100
TGCStandard 57.185.7 100 0.5485.7
Non-CP-K. pneumoniaeCAZStandard 3.6 7.110.7 14.3 32.1100≥512≥5127.1
High 3.6 7.1 10.7 100≥512≥5123.6
(28)CAZ-AVIStandard 7.128.660.771.482.196.4100 2≥51282.1
High 7.114.342.950.064.367.971.489.3100 8≥51250.0
ATMStandard 10.7 14.317.9100≥512≥51210.7
High 3.6 7.1 10.7 100≥512≥5123.6
ATM-AVIStandard 3.621.450.075.082.192.9 100 0.54NA
High 13.67.1 21.4 28.671.4 75.092.910032256NA
MEMStandard 7.117.9 21.428.642.975.092.9100 163217.9
High 3.6 10.714.328.653.671.478.692.9100 c 161283.6
CSTStandard 14.364.3 67.975.085.7 96.4100 c 0.512864.3
TGCStandard 7.142.964.389.396.4 100 187.1
CP-K. pneumoniaeCAZStandard 32.157.1100≥512≥5120
High 3.6100≥512≥5120
(28)CAZ-AVIStandard 7.142.964.367.9 1004≥51267.9
High 17.939.360.764.3 67.91008≥51260.7
ATMStandard 17.9100≥512≥5120
High 3.6100≥512≥5120
ATM-AVIStandard 53.678.6100 0.251NA
High 28.642.946.453.657.164.367.985.792.9 100 264NA
MEMStandard 3.67.1 10.725.053.664.3100 c 64≥2560
High 3.6 7.110.725.046.4100 c ≥256≥2560
CSTStandard 14.3100 0.50.5100
TGCStandard 17.942.975.092.996.4 100 480
CP, carbapenemase-producing; non-CP, non-carbapenemase-producing; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; CAZ, ceftazidime; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; ATM, aztreonam; ATM-AVI, aztreonam-avibactam; MEM, meropenem; CST, colistin; TGC, tigecycline. a CLSI susceptibility breakpoints were used: ceftazidime, ≤4 μg/mL; ceftazidime-avibactam, ≤8/4 μg/mL; aztreonam, ≤4 μg/mL; meropenem, ≤1 μg/mL; 2019 EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints were used for colistin and tigecycline: colistin, ≤2 μg/mL; tigecycline, ≤0.5 μg/mL. b Not available because no breakpoint criteria have been defined for aztreonam-avibactam. c MIC is greater than or equal to the indicated value.
Table 2. Positive rates of inoculum effect for carbapenem-resistant isolates.
Table 2. Positive rates of inoculum effect for carbapenem-resistant isolates.
Antimicrobial Agent
(Resistance Mechanism)
No. of Isolates (%) with Inoculum Effect ap Value
TotalE. coliK. pneumoniae
Ceftazidime-avibactam b12/67 (17.9)2/20 (10)10/47 (21.3)0.27
in CP-CRE2/22 (9.1)1/3 (33.3)1/19 (5.3)0.26
in non-CP-CRE10/45 (22.2)1/17 (5.9)9/28 (32.1)0.04
Aztreonam-avibactam38/81 (46.9)2/25 (8.0)36/56 (64.3)<0.001
in CP-CRE15/35 (42.9)1/7 (14.3)14/28 (50)0.10
in non-CP-CRE23/46 (50)1/18 (5.6)22/28 (78.6)<0.001
CP, carbapenemase-producing; CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; non-CP, non-carbapenemase-producing. a Inoculum effect was defined as an eightfold or greater increase in MIC on testing with the higher inoculum. b As the MIC values higher than 256 μg/mL for ceftazidime-avibactam were not further identified, the presence of the inoculum effect in the 14 isolates with these MICs was not determined.
Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant isolates according to resistance mechanism and inoculum.
Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant isolates according to resistance mechanism and inoculum.
Mechanism (n)Antimicrobial AgentInoculum SizeCumulative% with Indicated MICs (μg/mL)MIC (μg/mL)S a
0.060.1250.250.51248163264128256≥512MIC50MIC90
Non-CP-CRE(46) bCAZ-AVIStandard 4.323.956.569.680.495.797.8 10021680.4
High 10.923.945.758.771.776.178.389.195.7100825658.7
ATM-AVIStandard2.24.326.152.269.673.987.091.395.797.8 100 0.58NA c
High 2.21323.9 3743.545.75078.3 80.493.510016256NA
ESBL (30)CAZ-AVIStandard 6.716.750.063.380.093.396.7 10021680.0
High 10.023.333.353.366.773.376.790.093.3100812853.3
ATM-AVIStandard3.36.730.060.073.3 86.793.3100 0.58NA
High 3.316.730 33.34043.35073.3 76.793.310016256NA
AmpC (2)CAZ-AVIStandard 100 --100
High 50.0 100 --50.0
ATM-AVIStandard 50.0100 --NA
High 50.0 100 --NA
ESBL + AmpC (7)CAZ-AVIStandard 28.685.7100 24100
High 14.385.7 100 4128
ATM-AVIStandard 14.342.971.4100 12NA
High 42.9 100 3232NA
CP-CRE(35)CAZ-AVIStandard 11.440.060.062.9 1004≥51262.9
High 2.917.137.157.160.0 62.91008≥51257.1
ATM-AVIStandard5.7 54.377.197.1100 0.251NA
High 2.928.642.948.660.062.968.671.488.694.3 100 264NA
KPC (17)CAZ-AVIStandard 11.858.882.4 1002≥51282.4
High 11.841.276.5 82.41008≥51276.5
ATM-AVIStandard5.9 58.882.4100 0.251NA
High 35.347.158.864.7 70.6 94.1 100 132NA
NDM (11)CAZ-AVIStandard 9.118.227.3 100≥512≥51227.3
High 9.118.2 27.3 100≥512≥51218.2
ATM-AVIStandard9.1 54.563.690.9100 0.251NA
High 9.136.454.5 81.8 100 0.564NA
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; Non-CP CRE, non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; AmpC, AmpC beta-lactamase; CAZ, ceftazidime; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; ATM, aztreonam; ATM-AVI, aztreonam-avibactam; MEM, meropenem; CST, colistin; TGC, tigecycline. a CLSI susceptibility breakpoints were used: ceftazidime, ≤4 μg/mL; ceftazidime-avibactam, ≤8/4 μg/mL; aztreonam, ≤4 μg/mL; meropenem, ≤1 μg/mL; 2019 EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints were used for colistin and tigecycline: colistin, ≤2 μg/mL; tigecycline, ≤0.5 μg/mL. b Four E. coli isolates and three K. pneumoniae isolates did not produce ESBL nor AmpC beta-lactamases, respectively. c Not available because no breakpoint criteria have been defined for aztreonam-avibactam.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, T.; Lee, S.C.; Bae, M.; Sung, H.; Kim, M.-N.; Jung, J.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, S.-H.; Lee, S.-O.; Choi, S.-H.; et al. In Vitro Activities and Inoculum Effects of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates from South Korea. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120912

AMA Style

Kim T, Lee SC, Bae M, Sung H, Kim M-N, Jung J, Kim MJ, Kim S-H, Lee S-O, Choi S-H, et al. In Vitro Activities and Inoculum Effects of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates from South Korea. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(12):912. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Taeeun, Seung Cheol Lee, Moonsuk Bae, Heungsup Sung, Mi-Na Kim, Jiwon Jung, Min Jae Kim, Sung-Han Kim, Sang-Oh Lee, Sang-Ho Choi, and et al. 2020. "In Vitro Activities and Inoculum Effects of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates from South Korea" Antibiotics 9, no. 12: 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop