Previous Article in Journal
Colistin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Houseflies and Feces of Cattle and Pigs at a Slaughterhouse in Lima, Peru
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Environment Through Bonelli’s Eagles (Aquila fasciata) as Sentinels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clonal Diversity of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Canine Urinary Tract Infections in Brazil

by
Luciana Sartori
1,
João Pedro Rueda Furlan
2,
Fábio Parra Sellera
3,4,
Fernanda Borges Barbosa
1,
Yohanna Carvalho dos Santos Aoun Chikhani
5,
Gabriel Gandolfi
1 and
Terezinha Knöbl
1,*
1
Department of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
2
Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo 04039-032, Brazil
3
School of Veterinary Medicine, Metropolitan University of Santos, Santos 11045-002, Brazil
4
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
5
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(8), 819; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080819 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 24 June 2025 / Revised: 2 August 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 10 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance and Infections in Animals)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) strains, particularly those belonging to phylogenetic group B2, are clinically significant due to their frequent involvement in urinary tract infections (UTIs) and display antimicrobial resistance profiles. While the association of phylogroup B2 E. coli with human urinary tract infections is well established, the growing number of reports of ExPEC strains in canine UTIs highlights their clinical relevance in small animal medicine and raises concerns about their potential role in zoonotic transmission. This study investigated the microbiological and genomic features of E. coli strains isolated from dogs with UTIs in São Paulo, Brazil. Methods: Between March and May 2023, a total of 60 E. coli strains from canine UTIs were screened for antimicrobial susceptibility and phylotyping. Accordingly, four strains (6.6%) were identified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) or belonging to phylogroup B2 and, therefore, were submitted for characterization by whole-genome sequencing. Results: The four E. coli strains exhibited diverse antimicrobial resistance profiles, including resistance to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Phylogenetic groups B1, B2, and G, and sequence types (ST) 73, ST224, ST1193, and ST12960 were identified. The resistome included clinically important β-lactam resistance genes, such as blaCTX-M-55 and blaCMY-2, as well as mutations in the quinolone-resistance-determining region. Virulence factors associated with ExPEC pathogenesis, including adhesion, iron acquisition, immune evasion, and toxin, were detected. Plasmid sequences were identified as carrying antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes, highlighting the potential for horizontal gene transfer. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of genomic surveillance in companion animals to better understand the epidemiology of ExPEC strains and monitor the spread of MDR strains.

1. Introduction

Escherichia coli is a host-generalist Gram-negative bacterium that inhabits the gastrointestinal tract of both humans and animals [1]. However, the species comprises diverse pathogenic lineages, including diarrheagenic E. coli and extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), which are responsible for intestinal and extraintestinal infections, respectively [2]. The convergence of virulence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in ExPEC strains has become a global health threat, as it limits therapeutic options and increases the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes [3].
In the ExPEC pathotype, strains belonging to the phylogenetic group B2 are clinically important pathogens, as they are frequently identified in urinary tract infections (UTIs) and exhibit multidrug-resistant (MDR) profiles [4,5]. B2 E. coli strains commonly carry virulence genes that promote adhesion, immune evasion, and persistence in the urinary tract [6]. Notably, these strains have been recognized as major causative agents of UTIs in humans [7], with similar trends increasingly reported in companion animals [8,9]. However, data on their occurrence and genomic characteristics in canine UTIs remain more limited. This raises concern about the potential bidirectional transmission of MDR ExPEC, particularly given the close contact between humans and their pets [10].
Given the clinical burden of B2 E. coli in both human and veterinary medicine, understanding its prevalence, AMR profiles, and genetic traits in companion animals remains essential. Herein, we conducted a microbiological and genomic investigation of MDR and B2 E. coli strains isolated from canine UTIs in Brazil.

2. Results

2.1. Diverse AMR Profiles, Phylogroups, and Sequence Types in Canine UTI Strains

Four strains (6.6%) were identified as MDR or belonged to phylogroup B2 and, therefore, were submitted to genomic characterization (Table 1). The AMR profiles varied among the E. coli strains, with strain VPTEC10 resistant to AMP, CFE, CIP, ENR, and STP; strain VPTEC11 to AMP, CFE, CVN, CRO, CPM, and ATM; strain VPTEC38 to AMP, CFE, CIP, and ENR; and strain VPTEC43 exhibiting resistance exclusively to TRI. The MDR strains were resistant to broad-spectrum antimicrobials, including third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. By using genomic analysis, the phylogenetic groups were confirmed, except that the B2 of the VPTEC11 strain was corrected to G. Furthermore, E. coli strains displayed a genetic diversity of four distinct sequence types (ST), such as ST73, ST224, ST1193, and ST12960, with different CH types and serotypes (Table 1).

2.2. AMR and Biocide Resistance Determinants

The resistome analysis identified diverse antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), highlighting the extended-spectrum β-lactamases gene blaCTX-M-55 and cephalosporinase gene blaCMY-2. Other ARGs associated with resistance to β-lactams (blaTEM-1A), aminoglycosides (aadA12), fosfomycin (fosA3), lincosamides [lnu(A)], and trimethoprim (dfrA8) were also detected. Chromosomal mutations in GyrA, ParC, and ParE, which are associated with fluoroquinolone resistance, were identified in VPTEC10 and VPTEC38 strains. In this context, the AMR genotype corroborates the phenotype found. Furthermore, biocide resistance genes were also detected in the VPTEC10 strain, as follows: sitABCD (peroxide) in VPTEC11, VPTEC38, and VPTEC43 strains; and sitABCD and formA (aldehyde) (Table 1).

2.3. ExPEC-Related Virulence Factors

The virulence genes analysis revealed factors commonly associated with ExPEC pathogenesis. Most strains harbor genes linked to adhesion (e.g., csgA, fdeC, and yehABCD), iron acquisition (e.g., chuA, iucC, and iutA), and immune evasion (e.g., iss and ompT), which are critical for survival and colonization in host extraintestinal environments. Notably, VPTEC11, Ec38, and Ec43 strains carry genes aslA, astA, and tsh, which are implicated in epithelial interactions and toxin production. The presence of sat, usp, and vat genes in VPTEC38 and VPTEC43 strains further indicates their potential for causing tissue damage and immune modulation. In addition, the irp2-fyuA gene cluster, linked to the Yersinia high-pathogenicity island, was also detected in these strains (Table 1).
Capsule-related genes (kpsE and kpsMII) and the pap and foc fimbrial operons found in the VPTEC43 strain are commonly found in uropathogenic E. coli, reinforcing its ExPEC status. In contrast, VPTEC10 exhibits fewer typical ExPEC traits, with enrichment in fimbrial genes, such as faeAI, typically associated with enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), suggesting a different or hybrid pathotype (Table 1). Therefore, the virulence profiles of VPTEC11, VPTEC38, and VPTEC43 highlight their strong ExPEC potential, characterized by a convergence of genes that promote adhesion, iron uptake, toxin production, and resistance to host defenses.

2.4. Plasmid-Mediated Dissemination of AMR and Virulence Genes

E. coli strains harbor various plasmid replicons, including IncF, IncI1, IncN, and IncX families (Table 1). The blaCTX-M-55 and blaCMY-2 genes were identified on plasmid contigs. In the VPTEC11 strain, a 2763 bp fragment was identified as harboring the blaCTX-M-55 gene, which was flanked by ΔISEcp1 and orf477 elements. In the VPTEC38 strain, an IncI1-Iα plasmid fragment with 102,625 bp in length was identified as carrying AMR (blaCMY-2) and virulence (cib) genes. In this case, the blaCMY-2 gene was associated with ISEcp1, blc, and sugE elements. In addition, IncI1-Iα and IncFIB(AP001918) plasmid fragments were detected as harboring virulence genes in VPTEC10 (faeA-I), and VPTEC11 (ompT, etsC, and hlyF) strains, respectively.

3. Discussion

In this study, we report the occurrence and genomic characteristics of ExPEC strains isolated from canine UTI in Brazil, with a particular concern for those belonging to phylogenetic group B2. Our results contribute to growing genomic evidence linking specific E. coli lineages to pathogenicity and AMR in companion animals, reinforcing their clinical and epidemiological significance. The use of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) significantly enhances the accuracy of E. coli phylogroup determination and allows for comprehensive characterization of AMR, virulence factors, and mobile genetic elements [11]. Phylogroups B2 and G are closely related lineages within the ExPEC pathotype, often associated with extraintestinal infections [8,12].
Similar ExPEC phylogroups, with a predominance of group B and multiple STs, have been increasingly reported in dogs with UTIs across many countries, often exhibiting comparable patterns of AMR and virulence profiles [9,13,14]. In human medicine, particularly in healthcare settings, these same E. coli lineages have been frequently associated with extraintestinal infections and MDR profiles, suggesting that companion animals may serve as spillover hosts of MDR human-associated ExPEC pandemic clones [15]. This overlap raises important One Health concerns, as it indicates that dogs may act as reservoirs or recipients of globally disseminated ExPEC clones. Although studies from Brazil remain limited, the detection of these internationally recognized lineages in São Paulo suggests that similar dynamics are occurring locally and underscores the importance of regional genomic surveillance.
Some E. coli strains displayed a MDR profile, with particular concern to resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, which have been widely used as first-line choice therapeutic options for canine UTIs, although their empirical use has been discouraged by the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases [16]. The detection of clinically important β-lactam resistance genes, which confer resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and cephamycins, along with chromosomal mutations linked to quinolone resistance, supports the AMR phenotypic profiles found and highlights the convergence of resistance to β-lactams and quinolones [17]. Of concern, this AMR phenotype has been increasingly reported in E. coli strains from UTIs in both humans and dogs [18]. Additionally, the presence of biocide resistance genes may also suggest possible selective pressure exerted by disinfectants, which have been recognized as coselective agents promoting AMR in healthcare settings [19].
ExPEC strains belonged to four distinct STs. The ST73 is a pandemic ExPEC lineage characterized by conserved virulence factors and increasingly associated with UTIs in both humans and dogs [20,21], whereas the ST224 has been globally recognized as a One Health clone, isolated from a broad diversity of colonized or infected hosts, including animals, humans, and the environment [22,23,24,25], and has been associated with MDR patterns and fatal outcomes in pets [23]. The ST1193 is an emergent high-risk fluoroquinolone-resistant ExPEC and uropathogenic clone [26], recently documented carrying the carbapenemase gene blaKPC-2 [27]. Conversely, there are no reports of ST12960, although there are four poultry Norwegian genomes publicly available in the EnteroBase [28]. While its virulence and plasmid profiles do not substantially differ from other ExPEC strains, making it difficult to infer clinical relevance at this stage, its occurrence in a canine UTI remains noteworthy.
E. coli strains carried multiple virulence genes, including those involved in adhesion, iron acquisition, immune evasion, and toxin production. These factors are consistent with the ExPEC pathogenesis and explain the UTIs caused in the dogs studied [29]. Interestingly, an ExPEC strain also presented fimbrial genes typically found in ETEC strains [30]. Accordingly, hybrid pathotypes may emerge in companion animals, reflecting the plasticity of the E. coli genome and its ability to acquire and combine virulence traits from different pathotypes. This genetic flexibility can enhance pathogenic potential and complicate the clinical and epidemiological understanding of infections [31,32,33].
The presence of clinically relevant ARGs, along with virulence factors on plasmids in ExPEC strains from dogs, highlights the potential for horizontal gene transfer and rapid dissemination of these traits in clinical and veterinary settings [34]. Although the mobilization potential of these plasmids was not assessed in vitro in this study, their genetic content raises concerns regarding the dissemination of AMR and pathogenicity determinants across bacterial populations. Additional limitations include the relatively small number of E. coli strains analyzed and the narrow focus on a single geographic region. In this context, future studies should encompass additional areas and incorporate clinical data to better understand the epidemiology and impact of MDR ExPEC strains in canine UTIs in this country.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Collection, Bacterial Isolation, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Between March and May 2023, an investigation into the cause of UTIs in dogs was conducted at a large private clinical laboratory in São Paulo, the most populous city in Brazil. Accordingly, 60 E. coli strains, identified by BD Phoenix (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, USA), were obtained using MacConkey agar (Kasvi, Spain) from urine samples of individual dogs. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using BD Phoenix (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, USA) and disk diffusion methods.
The following antimicrobials were tested: aminoglycosides [streptomycin (STP), amikacin (AMK), and gentamicin], β-lactams [amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (AMC), ampicillin (AMP), ampicillin–sulbactam, cephalexin (CFE), cefovecin (CVN), ceftriaxone (CRO), and aztreonam (ATM)], fluoroquinolones [ciprofloxacin (CIP) and enrofloxacin (ENR)], tetracyclines [doxycycline (DOX)], nitrofurans (nitrofurantoin), and sulfonamides (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and trimethoprim). All results were interpreted using the breakpoints available from the Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [35], except for AMK, AMC, AMP, CFE, CVN, ENR, and DOX, for which the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [36] were used. Furthermore, MDR was established using the criteria established by Magiorakos et al. [37].

4.2. E. coli Phylotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted [38] and conventional polymerase chain reactions were used to determine the phylogenetic groups A, B1, B2, and D, using the genes chuA and yjaA, and the fragment of TspE4.C2 DNA. The phylogenetic groups were determined according to the following criteria: A [chuA(−)/TspE4.C2(−)]; B1 [chuA(−)/TspE4.C2(+)]; B2 [chuA(+)/yjaA(+)]; and D [chuA(+)/yjaA(−)] [39].

4.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Analysis

Genome sequencing was carried out using the Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) or MinION platforms (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK). The draft genomes were de novo assembled by SPAdes v.3.1.5 or Flye v.2.9.1. Phylogenetic groups were assigned using ClermonTyping v.23.06 (http://clermontyping.iame-research.center/, accessed on 23 April 2025). Multilocus sequence typing, CH typing, serotype, resistome, virulome, and plasmid replicons were determined using MLST v.2.0, CHTyper v.1.0, SerotypeFinder v.2.0, ResFinder v.4.7.2, VirulenceFinder v.2.0, and PlasmidFinder v.2.1, respectively, which are available at the Center For Genomic Epidemiology (https://www.genomicepidemiology.org/, accessed on 23 April 2025). All bioinformatic tools were used with their default parameters. Genetic environments were analyzed using ISfinder (https://www-is.biotoul.fr/index.php, accessed on 23 April 2025) and Nucleotide BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 23 April 2025).

5. Conclusions

This study provides genomic insights into ExPEC strains associated with canine UTIs in Brazil. The identification of medically important AMR genes and virulence markers commonly found in human clinical settings raises concerns about the potential of these successfully adapted pathogens to persist in companion animal populations and the possible risk of cross-species transmission between pets and their owners. These findings reinforce the importance of continued genomic epidemiological surveillance to better understand the dynamics of ExPEC infections in both veterinary and human medicine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: L.S. and T.K.; Data curation: L.S., J.P.R.F., F.P.S. and T.K.; Formal Analysis: L.S., J.P.R.F., F.P.S., F.B.B., Y.C.d.S.A.C., G.G. and T.K.; Writing—original draft L.S., J.P.R.F., F.P.S. and T.K.; Writing—review and editing: L.S., J.P.R.F., F.P.S., F.B.B., Y.C.d.S.A.C., G.G. and T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP; grant number 2022/11917-1), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; grant number 309921/2023-6), and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES; Finance code 001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of University of São Paulo (CEUA 6457160922).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequenced data are available online at the National Center for Biotechnology Information-NCBI (BioProject number PRJNA1276606).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the research grants from the FUMVET, FAPESP, CNPq, and CAPES. J.P.R.F. is a research fellow at FAPESP (grant number 23/16216-4). T.K. is a research fellow at CNPq (grant number 309921/2023-6). L.S., F.B.B., and G.G. are research fellows at CAPES (Finance code 001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Foster-Nyarko, E.; Pallen, M.J. The microbial ecology of Escherichia coli in the vertebrate gut. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 46, fuac008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Geurtsen, J.; de Been, M.; Weerdenburg, E.; Zomer, A.; McNally, A.; Poolman, J. Genomics and pathotypes of the many faces of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 46, fuac031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Massella, E.; Giacometti, F.; Bonilauri, P.; Reid, C.J.; Djordjevic, S.P.; Merialdi, G.; Bacci, C.; Fiorentini, L.; Massi, P.; Bardasi, L.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance profile and ExPEC virulence potential in commensal Escherichia coli of multiple sources. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rezatofighi, S.E.; Mirzarazi, M.; Salehi, M. Virulence genes and phylogenetic groups of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from patients with urinary tract infection and uninfected control subjects: A case-control study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramírez-Castillo, F.Y.; Moreno-Flores, A.C.; Avelar-González, F.J.; Márquez-Díaz, F.; Harel, J.; Guerrero-Barrera, A.L. An evaluation of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates in urinary tract infections from Aguascalientes, Mexico: Cross-sectional study. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2018, 17, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Whelan, S.; Lucey, B.; Finn, K. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC)-associated urinary tract infections: The molecular basis for challenges to effective treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, M.C.; Fan, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Bregente, C.J.B.; Lin, W.H.; Chen, C.A.; Lin, T.P.; Kao, C.Y. Characterization of uropathogenic Escherichia coli phylogroups associated with antimicrobial resistance, virulence factor distribution, and virulence-related phenotypes. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2023, 114, 105493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kidsley, A.K.; O’Dea, M.; Saputra, S.; Jordan, D.; Johnson, J.R.; Gordon, D.M.; Turni, C.; Djordjevic, S.P.; Abraham, S.; Trott, D.J. Genomic analysis of phylogenetic group B2 extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli causing infections in dogs in Australia. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 248, 108783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sroithongkham, P.; Nittayasut, N.; Yindee, J.; Nimsamer, P.; Payungporn, S.; Pinpimai, K.; Ponglowhapan, S.; Chanchaithong, P. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli causing canine pyometra and urinary tract infections are genetically related but distinct from those causing prostatic abscesses. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 11848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cozma, A.P.; Rimbu, C.M.; Zendri, F.; Maciuca, I.E.; Timofte, D. Clonal dissemination of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales between dogs and humans in households and animal shelters of Romania. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Didelot, X.; Bowden, R.; Wilson, D.J.; Peto, T.E.A.; Crook, D.W. Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Clermont, O.; Dixit, O.V.A.; Vangchhia, B.; Condamine, B.; Dion, S.; Bridier-Nahmias, A.; Denamur, E.; Gordon, D. Characterization and rapid identification of phylogroup G in Escherichia coli, a lineage with high virulence and antibiotic resistance potential. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3107–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Elankumaran, P.; Cummins, M.L.; Browning, G.F.; Marenda, M.S.; Reid, C.J.; Djordjevic, S.P. Genomic and temporal trends in canine ExPEC reflect those of human ExPEC. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e01291-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nittayasut, N.; Yindee, J.; Boonkham, P.; Yata, T.; Suanpairintr, N.; Chanchaithong, P. Multiple and high-risk clones of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant and blaNDM-5-harbouring uropathogenic Escherichia coli from cats and dogs in Thailand. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kidsley, A.K.; White, R.T.; Beatson, S.A.; Saputra, S.; Schembri, M.A.; Gordon, D.; Johnson, J.R.; O’Dea, M.; Mollinger, J.L.; Abraham, S.; et al. Companion animals are spillover hosts of the multidrug-resistant human extraintestinal Escherichia coli pandemic clones ST131 and ST1193. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weese, J.S.; Blondeau, J.; Boothe, D.; Guardabassi, L.G.; Gumley, N.; Papich, M.; Jessen, L.R.; Lappin, M.; Rankin, S.; Westropp, J.L.; et al. International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases (ISCAID) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of bacterial urinary tract infections in dogs and cats. Vet. J. 2019, 247, 8–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peirano, G.; Pitout, J.D.D. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Update on molecular epidemiology and treatment options. Drugs 2019, 79, 1529–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salgado-Caxito, M.; Benavides, J.A.; Adell, A.D.; Paes, A.C.; Moreno-Switt, A.I. Global prevalence and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in dogs and cats–a scoping review and meta-analysis. One Health 2021, 12, 100236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, B.; Han, J.; Dai, H.; Jia, P. Biocide-tolerance and antibiotic-resistance in community environments and risk of direct transfers to humans: Unintended consequences of community-wide surface disinfecting during COVID-19? Environ. Pollut. 2021, 283, 117074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jousserand, N.; Auvray, F.; Chagneau, C.; Cavalié, L.; Maurey, C.; Drut, A.; Lavoué, R.; Oswald, E. Zoonotic potential of uropathogenic Escherichia coli lineages from companion animals. Vet. Res. 2025, 56, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Handal, N.; Kaspersen, H.; Mo, S.S.; Cabanel, N.; Jørgensen, S.B.; Fortineau, N.; Oueslati, S.; Naas, T.; Glaser, P.; Sunde, M. A comparative study of the molecular characteristics of human uropathogenic Escherichia coli collected from two hospitals in Norway and France in 2019. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2025, 80, 1707–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. da Silva, M.M.; Sellera, F.P.; Furlan, J.P.R.; Aravena-Ramírez, V.; Fuentes-Castillo, D.; Fuga, B.; Dos Santos Fróes, A.J.; de Sousa, A.L.; Garino Junior, F.; Lincopan, N. Gut colonization of semi-aquatic turtles inhabiting the Brazilian Amazon by international clones of CTX-M-8-producing Escherichia coli. Vet. Microbiol. 2025, 301, 110344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Silva, M.M.; Sellera, F.P.; Fernandes, M.R.; Moura, Q.; Garino, F.; Azevedo, S.S.; Lincopan, N. Genomic features of a highly virulent, ceftiofur-resistant, CTX-M-8-producing Escherichia coli ST224 causing fatal infection in a domestic cat. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 15, 252–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jaidane, N.; Naas, T.; Boughattas, S.; Fraysseix, L.D.; Tilouche, L.; Souguir, M.; François, P.; Chermiti, W.; Trabelsi, A.; Madec, J.Y.; et al. Occurrence of mcr-1.1-producing Escherichia coli in clinical settings in Tunisia. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2025, 44, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fuga, B.; Sellera, F.P.; Cerdeira, L.; Esposito, F.; Cardoso, B.; Fontana, H.; Moura, Q.; Cardenas-Arias, A.; Sano, E.; Ribas, R.M.; et al. WHO critical priority Escherichia coli as One Health challenge for a post-pandemic scenario: Genomic surveillance and analysis of current trends in Brazil. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0125621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wyrsch, E.R.; Bushell, R.N.; Marenda, M.S.; Browning, G.F.; Djordjevic, S.P. Global phylogeny and F virulence plasmid carriage in pandemic Escherichia coli ST1193. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e02554-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dantas, K.; Melocco, G.; Esposito, F.; Fontana, H.; Cardoso, B.; Lincopan, N. Emergent Escherichia coli of the highly virulent B2-ST1193 clone producing KPC-2 carbapenemase in ready-to-eat vegetables. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2025, 41, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dyer, N.P.; Päuker, B.; Baxter, L.; Gupta, A.; Bunk, B.; Overmann, J.; Diricks, M.; Dreyer, V.; Niemann, S.; Holt, K.E.; et al. EnteroBase in 2025: Exploring the genomic epidemiology of bacterial pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D757–D762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sarowska, J.; Futoma-Koloch, B.; Jama-Kmiecik, A.; Frej-Madrzak, M.; Ksiazczyk, M.; Bugla-Ploskonska, G.; Choroszy-Krol, I. Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: Recent reports. Gut Pathog. 2019, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scheutz, F.; Nielsen, C.H.; von Mentzer, A. Construction of the ETECFinder database for the characterization of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and revision of the VirulenceFinder web tool at the CGE website. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2024, 62, e00570-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Braz, V.S.; Melchior, K.; Moreira, C.G. Escherichia coli as a multifaceted pathogenic and versatile bacterium. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 548492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.; Hu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, T.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X.; Peng, Z.; Sun, M.; Chen, H.; Zheng, J.; et al. Population structure and antibiotic resistance of swine extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli from China. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Santos, A.C.M.; Santos, F.F.; Silva, R.M.; Gomes, T.A.T. Diversity of hybrid- and hetero-pathogenic Escherichia coli and their potential implication in more severe diseases. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Carattoli, A. Plasmids and the spread of resistance. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 303, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. BrCAST. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters, Version 13.0; Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2023.
  36. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals. Supplement VET01S, 6th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2023; ISBN 978-1-68440-167-3. [Google Scholar]
  37. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lesiani, B.R.; Abror, Y.K.; Merdekawati, F.; Djuminar, A. Analysis of Purity and Concentration Escherichia coli DNA by Boiling Method Isolation with Addition of Proteinase-K and RNase. Indones. J. Med. Lab. Sci. Technol. 2023, 5, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Clermont, O.; Bonacorsi, S.; Bingen, E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4555–4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Escherichia coli strains isolated from UTIs of dogs in Brazil.
Table 1. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Escherichia coli strains isolated from UTIs of dogs in Brazil.
StrainAMR Profile 1PG 2ST 3CH TypeSerotype 4Resistome 5VirulomePlasmid Replicon
PCRWGSARGMutationBRG
GyrAParCParE
VPTEC10AMP, CFE, CIP, ENR, STPB1B12244–54O8:H32blaTEM-1A, aadA12, lnu(A)S83L, D87NS80IS458AsitABCD, formAcsgA, faeA, faeB, faeC, faeE, faeF, faeI, fdeC, gad, hlyE, hlyF, iss, lpfA, nlpI, ompT, sitA, terC, traJ, traT, yehABCDIncFIB(AP001918), IncFIB(pB171), IncFII, IncI1-Iα
VPTEC11AMP, CFE, CVN, CRO, CPM, ATMB2G12,96045–222O149:H34blaCTX-M-55, ΔblaTEM-1, fosA3nananasitABCDaslA, anr, astA, cea, chuA, cma, csgA, etsC, fdeC, gad, hlyF, iroN, iss, iucC, iutA, lpfA, nlpI, ompT, sitA, terC, traJ, traT, tsh, yehABCDIncFIB(AP001918), IncFIC(FII), IncFII(pHN7A8), IncN
VPTEC38AMP, CFE, CIP, ENRB2B2119314–64O75:H5blaCMY-2S83L, D87NS80IL416FsitABCDaslA, chuA, cib, csgA, fdeC, fyuA, gad, iha, irp2, iucC, iutA, kpsE, nlpI, ompT, sat, sitA, terC, usp, yfcV, yehABCDIncI1-ST12, ColpEC648
VPTEC43TRIB2B27324–30ONT:H1dfrA8nananasitABCDaslA, chuA, clbB, csgA, fdeC, focCsfaE, focG, focI, fyuA, gad, hha, iroN, irp2, iss, iucC, iutA, kpsE, kpsMII, nlpI, ompT, papA_F7-2, papC, pic, sat, terC, traJ, usp, vat, yehABCDIncFIB(AP001918), IncFII(29), IncX3
1 AMP, ampicillin; ATM, aztreonam; CFE, cephalexin; CVN, cefovecin; CRO, ceftriaxone; CIP; ciprofloxacin; ENR, enrofloxacin; STP, streptomycin; TRI, trimethoprim. 2 PG, phylogenetic group; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; WGS, whole-genome sequencing. 3 ST, sequence type. 4 NT, not typeable. 5 ARG, antimicrobial resistance gene; BRG, biocide resistance gene; na, not applied.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sartori, L.; Furlan, J.P.R.; Sellera, F.P.; Barbosa, F.B.; Chikhani, Y.C.d.S.A.; Gandolfi, G.; Knöbl, T. Clonal Diversity of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Canine Urinary Tract Infections in Brazil. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080819

AMA Style

Sartori L, Furlan JPR, Sellera FP, Barbosa FB, Chikhani YCdSA, Gandolfi G, Knöbl T. Clonal Diversity of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Canine Urinary Tract Infections in Brazil. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(8):819. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sartori, Luciana, João Pedro Rueda Furlan, Fábio Parra Sellera, Fernanda Borges Barbosa, Yohanna Carvalho dos Santos Aoun Chikhani, Gabriel Gandolfi, and Terezinha Knöbl. 2025. "Clonal Diversity of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Canine Urinary Tract Infections in Brazil" Antibiotics 14, no. 8: 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080819

APA Style

Sartori, L., Furlan, J. P. R., Sellera, F. P., Barbosa, F. B., Chikhani, Y. C. d. S. A., Gandolfi, G., & Knöbl, T. (2025). Clonal Diversity of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Canine Urinary Tract Infections in Brazil. Antibiotics, 14(8), 819. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080819

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop