Next Article in Journal
Molecular Detection of Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Helicobacter pylori-Positive Gastric Samples from Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy with Gastric Biopsy in Algarve, Portugal
Previous Article in Journal
Efflux-Mediated Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Recent Advances and Ongoing Challenges to Inhibit Bacterial Efflux Pumps
Previous Article in Special Issue
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Iraqi Parents Regarding Antibiotic Use in Children and the Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Care in Ghana: A Call to Action for Stewardship in This Population

by
Israel Abebrese Sefah
1,*,
Dennis Komla Bosrotsi
2,
Kwame Ohene Buabeng
1,
Brian Godman
3,4,5,* and
Varsha Bangalee
6
1
School of Pharmacy, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho PMB 31, Ghana
2
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatics, Fred Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho PMB 31, Ghana
3
Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa 0208, South Africa
4
Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
5
Antibiotic Policy Group, City St. George’s, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
6
Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(8), 779; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080779 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 June 2025 / Revised: 13 July 2025 / Accepted: 28 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Antibiotic use is common among hospitalized pediatric patients. However, inappropriate use, including excessive use of Watch antibiotics, can contribute to antimicrobial resistance, adverse events, and increased healthcare costs. Consequently, there is a need to continually assess their usage among this vulnerable population. This was the objective behind this study. Methods: The medical records of all pediatric patients (under 12 years) admitted and treated with antibiotics at a Ghanaian Teaching Hospital between January 2022 and March 2022 were extracted from the hospital’s electronic database. The prevalence and appropriateness of antibiotic use were based on antibiotic choices compared with current guidelines. Influencing factors were also assessed. Results: Of the 410 admitted patients, 319 (77.80%) received at least one antibiotic. The majority (68.65%; n = 219/319) were between 0 and 2 years, and males (54.55%; n = 174/319). Ceftriaxone was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (20.69%; n = 66/319), and most of the systemic antibiotics used belonged to the WHO Access and Watch groups, including a combination of Access and Watch groups (42.90%; n = 136/319). Neonatal sepsis (24.14%; n = 77/319) and pneumonia (14.42%; n = 46/319) were the most common diagnoses treated with antibiotics. Antibiotic appropriateness was 42.32% (n = 135/319). Multivariate analysis revealed ceftriaxone prescriptions (aOR = 0.12; CI = 0.02–0.95; p-value = 0.044) and surgical prophylaxis (aOR = 0.07; CI = 0.01–0.42; p-value = 0.004) were associated with reduced antibiotic appropriateness, while a pneumonia diagnosis appreciably increased this (aOR = 15.38; CI = 3.30–71.62; p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: There was high and suboptimal usage of antibiotics among hospitalized pediatric patients in this leading hospital. Antibiotic appropriateness was influenced by antibiotic type, diagnosis, and surgical prophylaxis. Targeted interventions, including education, are needed to improve antibiotic utilization in this setting in Ghana and, subsequently, in ambulatory care.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global concern with increasing morbidity and mortality exacerbated by inappropriate antibiotic use [1,2,3,4]. As a result, AMR is increasingly seen as the next pandemic unless appreciable activities are undertaken to help reverse rising AMR rates [5]. This is particularly important among low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Sub-Saharan African countries, where the burden of AMR is greatest [6,7]. The economic consequences associated with AMR can also be considerable, with estimates that by 2050, AMR could reduce the gross domestic product per country by up to 3.8% [8,9].
The pediatric population is at greater risk of AMR than other populations; consequently, this age group should be appropriately managed with antibiotics to reduce future AMR-related morbidity and mortality [10]. Considerable rates of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) have been reported in Africa in this population, which, in some studies, was up to 66–90%, increasing AMR [11,12,13,14,15,16]. These observations may have resulted from the increased inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics of 50% or more among pediatric patients [16,17,18,19]. It was estimated in 2022 that more than 752,000 children in Southeast Asia and 659,000 children across Africa died of AMR-associated complications [20,21], with over 1.5 million more deaths in other World Health Organization (WHO) regions from AMR-associated complications [20]. Many of these deaths were linked to increased use of Watch and Reserve antibiotics, with their higher resistance potential [20,21,22], with the use of Watch and Reserve antibiotics increasing by 126% and 125%, respectively, in this population in Africa between 2019 and 2021 [21]. The is a concern with the pediatric population, typically exposed to antibiotics more than any other form of medication due to their susceptibility to infections [16], subject to rising antibiotic consumption in recent years [23]. There is, though, a lack of data on AMR-associated mortality among pediatric patients in Ghana; however, there is a high and growing prevalence of AMR in Ghana, causing concern [24].
There have been several global, regional, and national initiatives in recent years to address the issues with rising AMR rates. These include the instigation of the WHO Global Action Plan (GAP) to reduce AMR in 2015 [25], subsequently translated into national action plans (NAPs) [26,27,28]. This includes Ghana; however, there have been concerns with the implementation of NAPs across Africa due to resource and personnel issues [29,30,31]. Suggested NAP activities include greater monitoring of current antimicrobial utilization rates across sectors, as well as the instigation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities, which include the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), with their known impact on improving future antibiotic utilization [32,33,34].
Other global initiatives include the development of the WHO essential medicines list, classifying antibiotics into three categories, namely, Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) antibiotics, based on their resistance potential [22,35]. Under this system, antibiotics from the Access group, with their narrow spectrum of activity, are encouraged where antibiotic prescribing or dispensing is pertinent, due to their generally low resistance potential [22,35]. Antibiotics from the Watch group, which include azithromycin as well as third-generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone, should ideally be prescribed only in critical conditions due to their broader-spectrum activity and greater resistance potential. Antibiotics from the Reserve group, including colistin, should only be prescribed in multi-drug-resistant cases as they are last-resort antibiotics [22,35]. This helps to explain why there is concern with the substantial increase in the use of Watch and Reserve antibiotics among children in Africa between 2019 and 2021 [21].
In 2022, the WHO launched the WHO AWaRe book, giving guidance on the management of 35 infections typically seen across sectors, with guidance subsequently moderated depending on local resistance patterns and updates [36,37,38,39]. It is increasingly likely that indicators to improve future antibiotic prescribing will be based on reducing the utilization of Watch and Reserve antibiotics [40]. Indicators are also likely to include encouraging greater adherence to well-accepted and robust guidelines now that the WHO AWaRe book guidelines are available, alongside the increasing use of the WHO AWaRe system to track antibiotic utilization patterns [36,38,39,40,41,42]. Such activities will be encouraged by the recent United Nations General Assembly (UN GA) goal to reduce AMR, which includes a new target of at least 70% of antibiotic use across sectors being from the Access group [43]. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Sub-Saharan African countries, will be critical in this respect to reverse increasing consumption of Watch and Reserve antibiotics, including among children, and their subsequent impact on AMR [21,44,45]. Published studies in LMICs have shown that increased audit and education surrounding the AWaRe classification and guidance can decrease inappropriate prescribing of Watch and Reserve antibiotics, including in Ghana [46,47].
We are aware that there have been concerns with inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics across the sectors in Ghana, including among children and during the COVID-19 pandemic, exacerbated by a lack of culture and sensitivity testing (CST) and compliance with treatment guidelines [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. The lack of routine CST activities among hospitals in Ghana is not helped by high patient co-payments for testing [49,51,58,60]. Concerns with guideline compliance among hospitals in Ghana include the Ho Teaching Hospital (HTH), where a point prevalence survey (PPS) undertaken in 2020 showed a high prevalence of antibiotic use among children, exacerbated by a poor guideline compliance rate of 33% [51,61,62]. Infections in Ghana’s pediatric population are an appreciable concern, with pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria being the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in this population [53,61,62]. Limited access to medical care, especially in rural areas, alongside malnutrition, exacerbates the situation [63]. However, we are also aware of ongoing activities to improve future antibiotic prescribing in Ghana. This includes the implementation of the AMR NAP coupled with the establishment of a national AMR platform to ensure coordinated interventions, enhancing antibiotic and microbiological data surveillance, along with other ASP activities, which should all help address some of the current concerns [15,47,64,65].
Consequently, given previous findings and activities, there is a need to assess the current prevalence and appropriateness of antibiotic use initially among hospitalized pediatric patients presenting with common infectious diseases in Ghana, alongside key factors influencing treatment choices. Given this objective, this paper aims to ascertain current antibiotic utilization patterns among hospitalized children in a tertiary hospital in Ghana, their appropriateness, and key factors influencing antibiotic choices. The findings can be used to suggest targeted interventions where pertinent to improve future antibiotic prescribing among this vulnerable hospitalized population. This is seen as imperative, with pediatricians in tertiary hospitals playing a key role in educating future prescribers in primary care. If there are concerns with the antibiotic-prescribing habits and knowledge regarding AMS among hospital pediatricians [66], these concerns will be magnified once trained physicians and other healthcare professionals start treating children in ambulatory care in Ghana.

2. Results

The electronic medical records of pediatric patients (children under 12 years) admitted and treated with antibiotics at the Ho Teaching Hospital over a three-month duration (January 2022 to March 2022) were collected and analyzed.

2.1. Patient Characteristics and Their Association with Guideline Compliance

The total number of pediatric patients hospitalized within the three-month study period was 410. Out of this, 319 patients were prescribed an antibiotic, giving a prevalence rate of 77.80%. With a mean age of 2.39 ± 2.99 years, the majority (68.65%; n = 219/319) of patients were between the ages of 0 and 2 years, followed by those between the ages of 3 and 5 years (16.61%; n = 53/319). Most of the children were male (54.55%; n = 174/319) and lived in the rural part of the Ho Municipality (46.86%; n = 149/318) (Table 1).
The mean duration of admission was 9.14 ± 10.73 days, while that of antibiotic therapy was 3.03 ± 2.43 days. Most (96.55%; n = 308/319) of the patients’ treatment was based on biomarker findings, with white blood cell count (WBC) (41.56%; n = 128/308) being the most commonly used biomarker, followed by a combination of WBC with C-reactive protein (CRP) (26.30%; n = 81/308).
The majority (56.74%; n = 181/319) of the pediatric patients were prescribed two antibiotics, followed by those who were given a single antibiotic (37.62%; N = 120/319). The commonest antibiotics prescribed were ceftriaxone (20.69%; n = 66/319), followed by a combination of cefotaxime + flucloxacillin (15.99%; n = 51/319) and ampicillin + gentamicin (15.05%; n = 48/319). Most of the systemic antibiotics prescribed were a combination of the WHO Access and Watch groups (42.90%; n = 136/319), followed by those from the Watch group alone (29.97%; n = 95/319). Most antibiotics were administered intravenously (82.76%; n = 264/319), followed by a combination of intravenous and oral (IV + PO) routes (8.46%; n = 27/319).
Neonatal sepsis (24.14%; n = 77/319), followed by pneumonia (14.42%; n = 46/319) and neonatal jaundice arising from neonatal sepsis (5.64%; 18/319), were the most common infectious diseases managed with antibiotics among these neonates and children.
The level of appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions for these patients based on guideline compliance was 42.32% (n = 135/319). The greatest compliance among the various infectious diseases diagnosed was seen in the management of childhood pneumonia (84.78% of patients), with the least compliance among reasonable patient numbers seen in those neonates and children undergoing surgery to prevent wound infections (Table 1). Overall, the level of appropriateness, i.e., guideline compliance versus non-compliance, was associated with the type of antibiotic prescribed (p-value < 0.001), the class of antibiotic prescribed (p-value < 0.001), the WHO AWaRe classification of the antibiotic (p-value < 0.001), the route of administration of the antibiotic (p-value = 0.009), and the diagnosis (p-value < 0.001) (Table 1).

2.2. Predictors of Level of Appropriateness Based on Treatment Guideline Compliance

The level of appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing based on the choice of antibiotic was reduced by 88% when ceftriaxone (aOR = 0.12; CI = 0.02–0.95; p-value = 0.044) was prescribed compared with that of amoxicillin with clavulanic acid.
The appropriateness level was increased by approximately 15 times when pneumonia (aOR = 15.38; CI = 3.30–71.62; p-value < 0.001) was diagnosed compared with a neonatal sepsis diagnosis; however, appropriateness levels were reduced by 93% when antibiotics were given for surgical prophylaxis (aOR = 0.07; CI = 0.01–0.42; p-value = 0.004) compared with when neonatal sepsis was diagnosed (Table 2). Overall, this showed a statistically significant association and guideline compliance based on antibiotic choice.

3. Discussion

This study found a high prevalence of antibiotic use among hospitalized pediatric patients in a leading tertiary hospital in the Volta Region, similar to previous studies in Ghana and other LMICs [51,52,61,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. However, other studies in LMICs have demonstrated a lower prevalence of antibiotic use among this population [75,76]. The principal concern in HTH was that more than 50% of the pediatric population were given a combination of at least two broad-spectrum antibiotics, which included antibiotics from the Watch group. This has implications for increasing the risk of AMR and must be the subject of future ASPs in this hospital as well as similar hospitals across Ghana [38,45].
We are aware of recent activities in Ghanaian hospitals to increase the instigation of ASPs given concerns with current hospital antibiotic utilization patterns. This has been helped by partnerships with UK institutions under the umbrella of the Commonwealth Partnerships for promoting ASPs alongside other activities [15,34,47,60,64,77]. However, we are also aware that the implementation of ASPs has been challenging across LMICs, including Ghana, and among pediatricians, due to factors such as health system challenges, which include inadequate diagnostic infrastructure, inadequate capacity building, poor supply chains, and unregulated antibiotic access [66,78]. This, though, is now changing across Africa, including Ghana, where studies have shown promising results from ASP interventions [34,47,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82]. This is important to attain UN GA targets of increased use of Access antibiotics, with their lower risk of causing AMR, especially given the increasing use of Watch antibiotics among children in Africa in recent years [21,22,32,43,65].
The low level of adherence to current guidelines in our study, at only 43.2% of antibiotic prescriptions, is of utmost concern, alongside the prescribing of irrational antibiotic combinations. Poor adherence may have stemmed from limited awareness or understanding of current guidelines, and the AWaRe classification of antibiotics, similar to other studies in Ghana and other LMICs [49,51,74,83,84]. Additional obstacles may have included inadequate training, lack of knowledge regarding ASPs, access to appropriate resources, and high patient loads that pressure quick decision making [60,66,84]. These barriers, though, were not assessed in this study. However, they will be explored further in future studies, considering their beneficial impact on subsequent antibiotic use with increasing adherence to robust guidelines. Whilst the irrational use of antibiotics has been observed in other countries and settings among this population [74,85,86,87,88,89], this needs to be urgently addressed in HTH and across Ghana to achieve NAP and UN GA AMR goals [30,43].
Overall, the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in our study was associated with the type of antibiotics, the WHO AWaRe group, the route of administration, and the type of infectious disease diagnosed (Table 1). Among the clinical characteristics assessed in this study, increased appropriateness was predicted by a diagnosis of pneumonia and reduced among those patients given antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis (Table 2). This is partly encouraging, with pneumonia being one of the leading causes of admission among children in this hospital and elsewhere across LMICs [50,61,74,88,90]. Prolonged use of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis, though, is a concern, increasing adverse reactions, AMR, and healthcare costs [6,91].
Another key concern was the appreciable prescribing of ceftriaxone, either alone or in combination with the current Ghanaian STG, prioritizing the prescribing of a penicillin combination, namely, amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid or ampicillin with gentamicin, over the use of third-generation cephalosporins for the management of commonly diagnosed pediatric conditions [92]. These include respiratory tract infections, neonatal sepsis, and antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis. In addition, third-generation cephalosporins are in the WHO ‘Watch’ group, with their increased risk of AMR development [22,35]. Third-generation cephalosporins are especially noted for increased selective pressure that precipitates genetic mutation for AMR genes, leading to treatment failures and, consequently, increased mortality [93,94]. As a result, their prescribing should be avoided where possible. The recent publication of the WHO AWaRe book, giving guidance for the optimal management of 35 infectious diseases across sectors, should help in this regard, enhanced by recent additions as well as quality indicators based on AWaRe percentage rates and adherence to the WHO AWaRe book guidance [36,37,38,39,40].
Whilst the studied children were exposed to antibiotics for approximately three days, the duration of hospital stay was approximately nine days. This suggests that despite a relatively short duration of antibiotic treatment, hospitalization was prolonged, potentially increasing their risk of healthcare-associated infections and healthcare costs [95,96]. This highlights the urgent need for optimized care pathways and discharge planning in the hospital to improve future patient outcomes and reduce resource utilization. Whilst we did not assess the reasons for prolonged hospitalization in our study, high inappropriate use of antibiotics may have contributed to the delay in recovery [83,97,98].
Suggested ASPs in the hospital center on clinician education surrounding guideline-recommended antibiotics, as well as prospective audits coupled with feedback. These measures are some of the well-studied interventions that have shown a positive impact on improving guideline compliance within hospitals and subsequent appropriate antibiotic use, especially in low-resource settings, including among African countries [80,81,82,84,99,100,101]. Key areas for ASPs in HTH include the management of sepsis among neonates and children, which is associated with high mortality rates, appropriate antibiotic use to prevent surgical site infections, and educational programs and audits to reduce unnecessary prescribing of ceftriaxone alongside any irrational combinations [60,64,77,91,101,102,103]. Alongside this, universities in Ghana need to ensure that all healthcare students are well-versed in ASP principles, including increasing their knowledge and skills in the use of guideline-recommended antibiotics, as well as the WHO AWaRe system and guidance, by integrating this in their curricula and using teaching methods, including case-based learning and objective-structured clinical examination [60,84,100,101,104].
We are aware of a number of limitations with our study. Firstly, we only included one tertiary hospital for the reasons stated. The number of surveyed patients may also have been enhanced if the study duration had been prolonged. We also did not assess the impact of appropriate/inappropriate antibiotic use on outcome measures, including death, recovery, and discharge rates. Another observed limitation was the absence of microbiological data to support clinical decisions made; however, this is typically seen among these hospitals in Ghana with high patient co-payments for culture and sensitivity testing. We also did not have a comparator group, as we wanted to assess adherence to current guidelines in this vulnerable group as a starting point going forward. Finally, we did not assess issues of seasonality for the same reasons. Despite these limitations, we are confident that the study findings have provided baseline data for more rigorous studies and implementation research to improve antibiotic use among the pediatric population in this hospital and across the region.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design

The study design was a prospective cross-sectional survey of the medical records of all pediatric patients (children under 12 years) admitted and treated with antibiotics at the Ho Teaching Hospital (HTH) over a three-month duration (January 2022 to March 2022) using the hospital’s electronic database.
The HTH was chosen for this study as it is a tertiary care facility located in the capital city of the Volta region, established in November 1998. It is currently the main referral facility in the Volta region [61]. The Volta region is one of Ghana’s sixteen administrative regions, with a 2021 population of 1,659,040, and Ho is its capital city [105]. The HTH provides services to approximately 194,000 outpatients and 12,500 inpatients annually. Alongside this, their gatekeeper system allows for admission and management of not only tertiary but also primary care cases. Consequently, the findings of antibiotic use from this facility may apply to lower (primary) and upper (secondary and tertiary) care facilities with a similar demography and resources in this country and other LMICs.

4.2. Study Site and Population

This study was conducted in the Pediatric Department of the HTH (comprising the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Babies Unit, and Children’s Unit) located in the Volta region of Ghana. The Pediatric Department admits sick children who are less than 1 month in the NICU, between 1 month to 6 months in the Babies Unit, and between 7 months and less than 12 years in the Children’s Unit. The Children’s Unit with 25 beds admits an average of 950 children annually, the baby unit with a 20-bed capacity admits an average of 700 babies, and the NICU with a 20-bed capacity admits an average of 450 neonates annually [61]. The department has pediatric consultants, specialists, residents, and medical officers providing various services to hospitalized and ambulatory care patients.

4.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All pediatric patients (below the age of 12 years) admitted, diagnosed with an infectious disease, and managed with antibiotics were included in this study. All sick pediatric patients within the target age group who were diagnosed as having infectious diseases and managed with antibiotics in the ambulatory clinics of this hospital were excluded to concentrate just on inpatient prescribing.

4.4. Sample Size and Sampling Technique

No sampling was performed, as all hospitalized sick children who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. However, the study sample was guided by an estimated size of 325 patients from an expected annual sample of participants using the Raosoft Inc. (Seattle, WA, USA) online calculator, assuming a 50% appropriateness of antibiotic prescription, an average monthly inpatient attendance at the pediatric department of 175, a 95% confidence interval, and a 5% margin of error.

4.5. Data Collection

Data were collected from the hospital’s Lightwave Health Information Management System (LHIMS) (an electronic medical record system) using an adapted data collection checklist from the Global Point Prevalence Survey Data Collection sheet [49,106,107]. The checklist included sociodemographic information, such as age, gender, and location of residence (rural, urban, or peri-urban), and clinical characteristics, including the treatment based on biomarkers, the duration of admission, culture and sensitivity testing, the number and type of antibiotics prescribed, the route of administration, and the diagnosis made.
Antibiotics were grouped according to their anatomical, therapeutic, and chemical (ATC) classification, as well as by their AWaRe classification [22,35,108]. AWaRe antibiotic groups were combined if a pediatric patient was given more than one antibiotic from different groups, e.g., Access and Watch antibiotics. The long-term goal of the UN GA is to increase the use of Access antibiotics to at least 70% utilization across sectors [43].

4.6. Antibiotic Appropriateness

Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed based on the right choice of antibiotics according to the antibiotic guidelines, as contained in the Seventh Edition of the Ghana Standard Treatment Guidelines (STG) for the management of infectious diseases in the pediatric population [92]. Compliance with current guidelines is increasingly seen as an important marker of the quality of antimicrobial prescribing [50,52,74,104,109,110], especially if no or limited CST testing is undertaken, as typically seen among hospitals in Ghana, with high co-payments for these tests [49,51,58,60].

4.7. Data Analysis

The checklist data were entered into a Microsoft Excel sheet before being exported to STATA version 14 (StrataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) for analysis. The appropriateness of prescribed antibiotics based on the choice for the diagnosed infectious disease was the primary study outcome measure.
Descriptive statistics were used to determine the mean age, the duration of admission, the duration of antibiotic use, and the proportions of each categorical variable. Diagnoses were combined where there were small patient numbers to help improve the interpretation of the findings. The chi-square test of independence was performed to assess any association between the outcome variable and the various independent variables. A logistic regression analysis was also performed using all statistically significant independent variables from the bivariate analysis (p-value < 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval).

4.8. Ethical Consideration

Ethical approval was secured from both the Research Ethics Committees of the University of Health and Allied Sciences (UHAS-REC A.7 [75] 22-23) and the Ho Teaching Hospital (HTH-REC (33) FC_2022). Personal identifiers of patients were excluded during the data collection to safeguard confidentiality. No informed consent was sought from the participants as there was no direct patient contact during the data collection period. The medical records of patients were directly extracted from the hospital electronic database.

5. Conclusions

This study found a high prevalence of antibiotic use in this hospitalized pediatric population. This included irrational broad-spectrum antibiotic combinations and third-generation cephalosporins, with ceftriaxone being the most commonly prescribed. These are concerns, as this combination potentially increases antibiotic resistance, highlighting the need for more responsible prescribing practices.
The hospital should prioritize continuous professional development on rational prescribing as part of ASPs. ASPs should concentrate on increasing adherence to evidence-based guidelines, including for surgical prophylaxis and neonatal sepsis through training and education on these guidelines and the WHO AWaRE classification. There is a need to instigate diagnostic AMS by improving microbiological infrastructure and resources to address concerns with currently high patient co-payments for CST to reduce empiric prescribing in this and other hospitals in Ghana, along with sustained surveillance and monitoring of antibiotic use and antimicrobial susceptibility data, all driven by strong leadership commitment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.A.S., D.K.B., K.O.B. and V.B.; methodology, I.A.S., D.K.B., K.O.B. and B.G.; validation: I.A.S., D.K.B. and B.G.; formal analysis, I.A.S., D.K.B., V.B., K.O.B. and B.G.; investigation, I.A.S., D.K.B. and K.O.B.; resources, I.A.S. and D.K.B.; data curation, I.A.S., D.K.B., K.O.B., V.B. and B.G.; writing—original draft I.A.S., D.K.B. and B.G.; writing—review and editing, all authors.; visualization, I.A.S. and V.B.; supervision, I.A.S.; project administration, I.A.S. and D.K.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval was secured from both the Research Ethics Committees of the University of Health and Allied Sciences (UHAS-REC A.7 [75] 22-23) and the Ho Teaching Hospital (HTH-REC (33) FC_2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable as personal identifiers of patients were excluded during the data collection to safeguard confidentiality, with administrative approval given by the management of the hospital for this study. This is similar to other prevalence studies undertaken by the co-authors in Ghana and other African countries [49,50,51].

Data Availability Statement

Additional data will be made available from the co-authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Salam, M.A.; Al-Amin, M.Y.; Salam, M.T.; Pawar, J.S.; Akhter, N.; Rabaan, A.A.; Alqumber, M.A.A. Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cassini, A.; Hogberg, L.D.; Plachouras, D.; Quattrocchi, A.; Hoxha, A.; Simonsen, G.S.; Colomb-Cotinat, M.; Kretzschmar, M.E.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Cecchini, M.; et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: A population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bell, B.G.; Schellevis, F.; Stobberingh, E.; Goossens, H.; Pringle, M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistance. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gautam, A. Antimicrobial Resistance: The Next Probable Pandemic. JNMA 2022, 60, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sartorius, B.; Gray, A.P.; Weaver, N.D.; Aguilar, G.R.; Swetschinski, L.R.; Ikuta, K.S.; Mestrovic, T.; Chung, E.; Wool, E.E.; Han, C.; et al. The burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in the WHO African region in 2019: A cross-country systematic analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2024, 12, e201–e216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lewnard, J.A.; Charani, E.; Gleason, A.; Hsu, L.Y.; Khan, W.A.; Karkey, A.; Chandler, C.I.R.; Mashe, T.; Khan, E.M.; Bulabula, A.N.H.; et al. Burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in low-income and middle-income countries avertible by existing interventions: An evidence review and modelling analysis. Lancet 2024, 403, 2439–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. World Bank Group. Pulling Together to Beat Superbugs Knowledge and Implementation Gaps in Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance. 2019. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/32552/Pulling-Together-to-Beat-Superbugs-Knowledge-and-Implementation-Gaps-in-Addressing-Antimicrobial-Resistance.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 15 March 2025).
  9. Hofer, U. The cost of antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Atif, M.; Zia, R.; Malik, I.; Ahmad, N.; Sarwar, S. Treatment outcomes, antibiotic use and its resistance pattern among neonatal sepsis patients attending Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0244866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Okomo, U.; Akpalu, E.N.K.; Le Doare, K.; Roca, A.; Cousens, S.; Jarde, A.; Sharland, M.; Kampmann, B.; Lawn, J.E. Aetiology of invasive bacterial infection and antimicrobial resistance in neonates in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis in line with the STROBE-NI reporting guidelines. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 1219–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Al Jarousha, A.M.; El Jadba, A.H.; Al Afifi, A.S.; El Qouqa, I.A. Nosocomial multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the neonatal intensive care unit in Gaza City, Palestine. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 13, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Le Doare, K.; Barker, C.I.; Irwin, A.; Sharland, M. Improving antibiotic prescribing for children in the resource-poor setting. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015, 79, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ibrahim, B.A.; Damiri, B.; Allabadi, H.; Qadi, M. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of septicemia in neonatal intensive care units in Palestine: A retrospective study. IJID Reg. 2024, 10, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Donkor, E.S.; Muhsen, K.; Johnson, S.A.M.; Kotey, F.C.N.; Dayie, N.; Tetteh-Quarcoo, P.B.; Tette, E.M.A.; Osei, M.-M.; Egyir, B.; Nii-Trebi, N.I.; et al. Multicenter Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance among Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Bloodstream Infections in Ghana. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Romandini, A.; Pani, A.; Schenardi, P.A.; Pattarino, G.A.C.; De Giacomo, C.; Scaglione, F. Antibiotic resistance in pediatric infections: Global emerging threats, predicting the near future. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karataş, Y.; Khan, Z. Antibiotic usage in the Pediatric population: The need for effective role of parents and prescribers. Güncel Pediatri 2021, 19, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miao, R.; Wan, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J.; Qin, J.; Xia, J.; Yan, H. Inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions among pediatric inpatients in different type hospitals. Medicine 2020, 99, e18714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Baig, M.T.; Sial, A.A.; Huma, A.; Ahmed, M.; Shahid, U.; Syed, N. Irrational antibiotic prescribing practice among children in critical care of tertiary hospitals. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 30 (Suppl. S4), 1483–1489. [Google Scholar]
  20. Clinton Health Access Initiative. Over 3 Million Children Died from AMR-Related Infections in 2022, Major Study Shows. April 2025. Available online: https://www.clintonhealthaccess.org/news/over-3-million-children-died-from-amr-related-infections-in-2022-major-study-shows/ (accessed on 12 July 2025).
  21. ESCMID Over 3 Million Children Died from Antimicrobial Resistance-Related Infections in 2022, Major Study Shows. 2025. Available online: https://a-p-p-a.org/pdf/over-3-million-children-died-from-antimicrobial-resistance-related-infections-in-2022.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2025).
  22. Sharland, M.; Gandra, S.; Huttner, B.; Moja, L.; Pulcini, C.; Zeng, M.; Mendelson, M.; Cappello, B.; Cooke, G.; Magrini, N.; et al. Encouraging AWaRe-ness and discouraging inappropriate antibiotic use—The new 2019 Essential Medicines List becomes a global antibiotic stewardship tool. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 1278–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Allwell-Brown, G.; Hussain-Alkhateeb, L.; Kitutu, F.E.; Strömdahl, S.; Mårtensson, A.; Johansson, E.W. Trends in reported antibiotic use among children under 5 years of age with fever, diarrhoea, or cough with fast or difficult breathing across low-income and middle-income countries in 2005-17: A systematic analysis of 132 national surveys from 73 countries. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e799–e807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Donkor, E.S.; Odoom, A.; Osman, A.H.; Darkwah, S.; Kotey, F.C.N. A Systematic Review on Antimicrobial Resistance in Ghana from a One Health Perspective. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. WHO Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. 2015. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/193736/9789241509763_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 5 March 2025).
  26. Charani, E.; Mendelson, M.; Pallett, S.J.C.; Ahmad, R.; Mpundu, M.; Mbamalu, O.; Bonaconsa, C.; Nampoothiri, V.; Singh, S.; Peiffer-Smadja, N.; et al. An analysis of existing national action plans for antimicrobial resistance-gaps and opportunities in strategies optimising antibiotic use in human populations. Lancet Glob. Health 2023, 11, e466–e474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Iwu, C.D.; Patrick, S.M. An insight into the implementation of the global action plan on antimicrobial resistance in the WHO African region: A roadmap for action. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2021, 58, 106411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Willemsen, A.; Reid, S.; Assefa, Y. A review of national action plans on antimicrobial resistance: Strengths and weaknesses. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2022, 11, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Godman, B.; Egwuenu, A.; Wesangula, E.; Schellack, N.; Kalungia, A.C.; Tiroyakgosi, C.; Kgatlwane, J.; Mwita, J.C.; Patrick, O.; Niba, L.L.; et al. Tackling antimicrobial resistance across sub-Saharan Africa: Current challenges and implications for the future. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2022, 21, 1089–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ghana Ministry of Health; Ministry of Food and Agriculture; Ministry of Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation; Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development. Ghana National Action Plan for Antimicrobial Use and Resistance. 2017–2021. Available online: http://www.moh.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/NAP_FINAL_PDF_A4_19.03.2018-SIGNED-1.pdf (accessed on 4 March 2025).
  31. Jimah, T.O.O. National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance: Stakeholder analysis of implementation in Ghana. J. Glob. Health Rep. 2020, 4, e2020067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nathwani, D.; Varghese, D.; Stephens, J.; Ansari, W.; Martin, S.; Charbonneau, C. Value of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs [ASPs]: A systematic review. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sneddon, J.; Drummond, F.; Guise, T.; Gilchrist, M.; Jenkins, D.R. Accreditation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes: Addressing a global need to tackle antimicrobial resistance. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2024, 6, dlae007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ashiru-Oredope, D.; Garraghan, F.; Olaoye, O.; Krockow, E.M.; Matuluko, A.; Nambatya, W.; Babigumira, P.A.; Tuck, C.; Amofah, G.; Ankrah, D.; et al. Development and Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Checklist in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Co-Creation Consensus Approach. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharland, M.; Pulcini, C.; Harbarth, S.; Zeng, M.; Gandra, S.; Mathur, S.; Magrini, N. Classifying antibiotics in the WHO Essential Medicines List for optimal use—Be AWaRe. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. WHO. The WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) Antibiotic Book. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240062382 (accessed on 6 April 2025).
  37. Zanichelli, V.; Sharland, M.; Cappello, B.; Moja, L.; Getahun, H.; Pessoa-Silva, C.; Sati, H.; van Weezenbeek, C.; Balky, H.; Simao, M.; et al. The WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, Reserve) antibiotic book and prevention of antimicrobial resistance. Bull. World Health Organ. 2023, 101, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moja, L.; Zanichelli, V.; Mertz, D.; Gandra, S.; Cappello, B.; Cooke, G.S.; Chuki, P.; Harbath, S.; Pulcini, C.; Mendelson, M.; et al. WHO’s essential medicines and AWaRe: Recommendations on first- and second-choice antibiotics for empiric treatment of clinical infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2024, 30, S1–S51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Johnson, S.; Lavergne, V.; Skinner, A.M.; Gonzales-Luna, A.J.; Garey, K.W.; Kelly, C.P.; Wilcox, M.H. Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA): 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e1029–e1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Funiciello, E.; Lorenzetti, G.; Cook, A.; Goelen, J.; Moore, C.E.; Campbell, S.M.; Godman, B.; Tong, D.; Huttner, B.; Chuki, P.; et al. Identifying AWaRe indicators for appropriate antibiotic use: A narrative review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2024, 79, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pauwels, I.; Versporten, A.; Drapier, N.; Vlieghe, E.; Goossens, H. Hospital antibiotic prescribing patterns in adult patients according to the WHO Access, Watch and Reserve classification (AWaRe): Results from a worldwide point prevalence survey in 69 countries. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 1614–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saleem, Z.; Sheikh, S.; Godman, B.; Haseeb, A.; Afzal, S.; Qamar, M.U.; Imam, M.T.; Abuhussain, S.S.A.; Sharland, M. Increasing the use of the WHO AWaRe system in antibiotic surveillance and stewardship programmes in low- and middle-income countries. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2025, 7, dlaf031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. United Nations. Political Declaration of the High-Level Meeting on Antimicrobial Resistance. 9 September 2024. Available online: https://www.un.org/pga/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2024/09/FINAL-Text-AMR-to-PGA.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2025).
  44. Klein, E.Y.; Milkowska-Shibata, M.; Tseng, K.K.; Sharland, M.; Gandra, S.; Pulcini, C.; Laxminarayan, R. Assessment of WHO antibiotic consumption and access targets in 76 countries, 2000–2015: An analysis of pharmaceutical sales data. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sulis, G.; Sayood, S.; Katukoori, S.; Bollam, N.; George, I.; Yaeger, L.H.; Chavez, M.A.; Tetteh, E.; Yarrabelli, S.; Pulcini, C.; et al. Exposure to World Health Organization’s AWaRe antibiotics and isolation of multidrug resistant bacteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Abu-Ajaleh, S.; Darwish Elhajji, F.; Al-Bsoul, S.; Abu Farha, R.; Al-Hammouri, F.; Amer, A.; Al Rusasi, A.; Al-Azzam, S.; Araydah, M.; Aldeyab, M.A. An Evaluation of the Impact of Increasing the Awareness of the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) Antibiotics Classification on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Hospital Antibiotic Prescribing Practices. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amponsah, O.K.O.; Courtenay, A.; Ayisi-Boateng, N.K.; Abuelhana, A.; Opoku, D.A.; Blay, L.K.; Abruquah, N.A.; Osafo, A.B.; Danquah, C.B.; Tawiah, P.; et al. Assessing the impact of antimicrobial stewardship implementation at a district hospital in Ghana using a health partnership model. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2023, 5, dlad084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sefah, I.A.; Denoo, E.Y.; Bangalee, V.; Kurdi, A.; Sneddon, J.; Godman, B. Appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a teaching hospital in Ghana: Findings and implications. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 4, dlac102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Afriyie, D.K.; Sefah, I.A.; Sneddon, J.; Malcolm, W.; McKinney, R.; Cooper, L.; Kurdi, A.; Godman, B.; Seaton, R.A. Antimicrobial point prevalence surveys in two Ghanaian hospitals: Opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 2, dlaa001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sefah, I.A.; Essah, D.O.; Kurdi, A.; Sneddon, J.; Alalbila, T.M.; Kordorwu, H.; Godman, B. Assessment of adherence to pneumonia guidelines and its determinants in an ambulatory care clinic in Ghana: Findings and implications for the future. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sefah, I.A.; Nyamadi, D.; Kurdi, A.; Bugri, A.A.; Kerr, F.; Yamoah, P.; Pichierri, G.; Godman, B. Assessment of the quality of antimicrobial prescribing among hospitalized patients in a teaching hospital in Ghana: Findings and implications. Hosp. Pract. 2023, 51, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Agyare, E.; Acolatse, J.E.E.; Dakorah, M.P.; Akafity, G.; Chalker, V.J.; Spiller, O.B.; Schneider, K.A.; Yevutsey, S.; Aidoo, N.B.; Blankson, S.; et al. Antimicrobial stewardship capacity and antibiotic utilisation practices in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana: A point prevalence survey study. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0297626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Labi, A.K.; Obeng-Nkrumah, N.; Sunkwa-Mills, G.; Bediako-Bowan, A.; Akufo, C.; Bjerrum, S.; Owusu, E.; Enweronu-Laryea, C.; Opintan, J.A.; Kurtzhals, J.A.L.; et al. Antibiotic prescribing in paediatric inpatients in Ghana: A multi-centre point prevalence survey. BMC Pediatr. 2018, 18, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Labi, A.K.; Obeng-Nkrumah, N.; Nartey, E.T.; Bjerrum, S.; Adu-Aryee, N.A.; Ofori-Adjei, Y.A.; Yawson, A.E.; Newman, M.J. Antibiotic use in a tertiary healthcare facility in Ghana: A point prevalence survey. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2018, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Labi, A.K.; Obeng-Nkrumah, N.; Dayie, N.; Egyir, B.; Sampane-Donkor, E.; Newman, M.J.; Opintan, J.A. Antimicrobial use in hospitalized patients: A multicentre point prevalence survey across seven hospitals in Ghana. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bediako-Bowan, A.A.A.; Owusu, E.; Labi, A.K.; Obeng-Nkrumah, N.; Sunkwa-Mills, G.; Bjerrum, S.; Opintan, J.A.; Bannerman, C.; Mølbak, K.; Kurtzhals, J.A.L.; et al. Antibiotic use in surgical units of selected hospitals in Ghana: A multi-centre point prevalence survey. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Adadey, S.M.; Ayee, R.; Languon, S.; Quansah, D.; Quaye, O. Patterns of Frequently Diagnosed Pediatric Morbidities in Hospitalized Children in the Volta Region of Ghana. Glob. Pediatr. Health 2019, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sefah, I.A.; Sarkodie, S.A.; Pichierri, G.; Schellack, N.; Godman, B. Assessing the Clinical Characteristics and Management of COVID-19 among Pediatric Patients in Ghana: Findings and Implications. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Amponsah, O.K.O.; Buabeng, K.O.; Owusu-Ofori, A.; Ayisi-Boateng, N.K.; Hämeen-Anttila, K.; Enlund, H. Point prevalence survey of antibiotic consumption across three hospitals in Ghana. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sefah, I.A.; Chetty, S.; Yamoah, P.; Godman, B.; Bangalee, V. An Assessment of the Current Level of Implementation of the Core Elements of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Public Hospitals in Ghana. Hosp. Pharm. 2024, 59, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dodoo, C.C.; Orman, E.; Alalbila, T.; Mensah, A.; Jato, J.; Mfoafo, K.A.; Folitse, I.; Hutton-Nyameaye, A.; Ben, I.O.; Mensah-Kane, P.; et al. Antimicrobial Prescription Pattern in Ho Teaching Hospital, Ghana: Seasonal Determination Using a Point Prevalence Survey. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Domapielle, M.K.; Dassah, C.; Dordaa, F.; Cheabu, B.S.N.; Sulemana, M. Barriers to health care access and utilization among aged indigents under the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty Programme (LEAP): The perspective of users and service providers in north-western Ghana. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2023, 24, e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Morales, F.; Montserrat-de la Paz, S.; Leon, M.J.; Rivero-Pino, F. Effects of Malnutrition on the Immune System and Infection and the Role of Nutritional Strategies Regarding Improvements in Children’s Health Status: A Literature Review. Nutrients 2023, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sneddon, J.; Cooper, L.; Afriyie, D.K.; Sefah, I.A.; Cockburn, A.; Kerr, F.; Cameron, E.; Goldthorpe, J.; Kurdi, A.; Seaton, R.A. Supporting antimicrobial stewardship in Ghana: Evaluation of the impact of training on knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals in two hospitals. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 2, dlaa092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dakorah, M.P.; Agyare, E.; Acolatse, J.E.E.; Akafity, G.; Stelling, J.; Chalker, V.J.; Spiller, O.B.; Aidoo, N.B.; Kumi-Ansah, F.; Azumah, D.; et al. Utilising cumulative antibiogram data to enhance antibiotic stewardship capacity in the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2022, 11, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mustafa, Z.U.; Khan, A.H.; Salman, M.; Harun, S.N.; Meyer, J.C.; Godman, B. Paediatricians’ knowledge, perceptions, preparedness and involvement towards paediatric antimicrobial stewardship in Pakistan: Findings and the implications. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2024, 6, dlae193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Moore, D.P.; Chetty, T.; Pillay, A.; Karsas, M.; Cloete, J.; Balakrishna, Y.; Reddy, T.; Archary, M.; van Kwawegen, A.; Thomas, R.; et al. Antibiotic and antifungal use in paediatric departments at three academic hospitals in South Africa. IJID Reg. 2024, 10, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xavier, S.P.; da Silva, A.M.C.; Victor, A. Antibiotic prescribing patterns in pediatric patients using the WHO access, watch, reserve (AWaRe) classification at a quaternary hospital in Nampula, Mozambique. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xavier, S.P.; Victor, A.; Cumaquela, G.; Vasco, M.D.; Rodrigues, O.A.S. Inappropriate use of antibiotics and its predictors in pediatric patients admitted at the Central Hospital of Nampula, Mozambique. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2022, 11, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Umeokonkwo, C.D.; Madubueze, U.C.; Onah, C.K.; Okedo-Alex, I.N.; Adeke, A.S.; Versporten, A.; Goossens, H.; Igwe-Okomiso, D.; Okeke, K.; Azuogu, B.N.; et al. Point prevalence survey of antimicrobial prescription in a tertiary hospital in South East Nigeria: A call for improved antibiotic stewardship. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 17, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Mambula, G.; Nanjebe, D.; Munene, A.; Guindo, O.; Salifou, A.; Mamaty, A.A.; Rattigan, S.; Ellis, S.; Khavessian, N.; van der Pluijm, R.W.; et al. Practices and challenges related to antibiotic use in paediatric treatment in hospitals and health centres in Niger and Uganda: A mixed methods study. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2023, 12, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sarker, R.; Khan, M.S.I.; Tareq, M.A.; Ghosh, S.; Chowdhury, S. Antibiotic Use Among Children Under 5 Years of Age in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bangladesh. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2021, 3, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Abdel-Qader, D.H.; Ismael, N.S.; Albassam, A.; El-Shara’, A.A.; Aljamal, M.S.; Ismail, R.; A Abdel-Qader, H.; Hamadi, S.; Al Mazrouei, N.; Ibrahim, O.M. Antibiotics use and appropriateness in two Jordanian children hospitals: A point prevalence study. J. Pharm. Health Serv. Res. 2021, 12, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Phuong, T.N.T.; Thu, V.H.T.; Minh, A.H.; Minh, A.H.; Sefah, I.A.; Godman, B.; Meyer, J.C. Barriers to Compliance with National Guidelines Among Children Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Vietnam and the Implications. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mandal, P.; Asad, M.; Kayal, A.; Biswas, M. Assessment of use of World Health Organization access, watch, reserve antibiotics and core prescribing indicators in pediatric outpatients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2023, 14, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Skosana, P.P.; Schellack, N.; Godman, B.; Kurdi, A.; Bennie, M.; Kruger, D.; Meyer, J. A national, multicentre, web-based point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use and quality indices among hospitalised paediatric patients across South Africa. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 29, 542–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ashiru-Oredope, D.; Nabiryo, M.; Zengeni, L.; Kamere, N.; Makotose, A.; Olaoye, O.; Townsend, W.; Waddingham, B.; Matuluko, A.; Nambatya, W.; et al. Tackling antimicrobial resistance: Developing and implementing antimicrobial stewardship interventions in four African commonwealth countries through a health partnership model. J. Public Health Afr. 2023, 14, 2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cox, J.A.; Vlieghe, E.; Mendelson, M.; Wertheim, H.; Ndegwa, L.; Villegas, M.V.; Gould, I.; Hara, G.L. Antibiotic stewardship in low- and middle-income countries: The same but different? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dramowski, A.; Prusakov, P.; Goff, D.A.; Brink, A.; Govender, N.P.; Annor, A.S. Prospective antimicrobial stewardship interventions by multidisciplinary teams to reduce neonatal antibiotic use in South Africa: The Neonatal Antimicrobial Stewardship (NeoAMS) study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2024, 146, 107158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Siachalinga, L.; Mufwambi, W.; Lee, I.H. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing for hospital inpatients in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hosp. Infect. 2022, 129, 124–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Otieno, P.A.; Campbell, S.; Maley, S.; Obinju Arunga, T.; Otieno Okumu, M. A Systematic Review of Pharmacist-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2022, 2022, 3639943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Akpan, M.R.; Isemin, N.U.; Udoh, A.E.; Ashiru-Oredope, D. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in African countries: A systematic literature review. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 22, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Nguyen, P.T.; Tran, H.T.; AFitzgerald, D.; Graham, S.M.; Marais, B.J. Antibiotic use in children hospitalised with pneumonia in Central Vietnam. Arch. Dis. Child. 2020, 105, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Saleem, Z.; Moore, C.E.; Kalungia, A.C.; Schellack, N.; Ogunleye, O.; Chigome, A.; Chowdhury, K.; Kitutu, F.E.; Massele, A.; Ramdas, N.; et al. Status and implications of the knowledge, attitudes and practices towards AWaRe antibiotic use, resistance and stewardship among low- and middle-income countries. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2025, 7, dlaf033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Al-Tawfiq, J.A.; Alawami, A.H. A multifaceted approach to decrease inappropriate antibiotic use in a pediatric outpatient clinic. Ann. Thorac. Med. 2017, 12, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dooling, K.L.; Shapiro, D.J.; Van Beneden, C.; Hersh, A.L.; Hicks, L.A. Overprescribing and inappropriate antibiotic selection for children with pharyngitis in the United States, 1997-2010. JAMA Pediatr. 2014, 168, 1073–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Marc, C.; Vrignaud, B.; Levieux, K.; Robine, A.; Guen, C.G.-L.; Launay, E. Inappropriate prescription of antibiotics in pediatric practice: Analysis of the prescriptions in primary care. J. Child Health Care 2016, 20, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mustafa, Z.U.; Salman, M.; Aslam, N.; Asif, N.; Hussain, K.; Shehzadi, N.; Hayat, K. Antibiotic use among hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract infections: A multicenter, retrospective study from Punjab, Pakistan. Expert. Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2022, 20, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Tran-Quang, K.; Nguyen-Thi-Dieu, T.; Tran-Do, H.; Pham-Hung, V.; Nguyen-Vu, T.; Tran-Xuan, B.; Larsson, M.; Duong-Quy, S. Antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Vietnamese children with severe pneumonia: A cross-sectional study. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1110903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. La Vecchia, A.; Teklie, B.G.; Mulu, D.A.; Toitole, K.K.; Montalbetti, F.; Agostoni, C.; Hessebo, T.T.; Tsegaye, A.; Pietravalle, A.; Manenti, F.; et al. Adherence to WHO guidelines on severe pneumonia management in children and its impact on outcome: An observational study at Jinka General Hospital in Ethiopia. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1189684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Mwita, J.C.; Ogunleye, O.O.; Olalekan, A.; Kalungia, A.C.; Kurdi, A.; Saleem, Z.; Sneddon, J.; Godman, B. Key Issues Surrounding Appropriate Antibiotic Use for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review and the Implications. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021, 14, 515–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. STG Ghana Standard Treatment Guidelines (STG)—Seventh Edition. Ministry of Health, Ghana Nationa Drug Programme. 2017. Available online: https://www.moh.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/GHANA-STG-2017-1.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  93. Aiken, A.M.; Rehman, A.M.; de Kraker, M.E.A.; Madrid, L.; Kebede, M.; Labi, A.K.; Obeng-Nkrumah, N.; Nyamwaya, B.; Kagucia, E.; Cocker, D.; et al. Mortality associated with third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacterales bloodstream infections at eight sub-Saharan African hospitals (MBIRA): A prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 1280–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dramowski, A.; Aiken, A.M.; Rehman, A.M.; Snyman, Y.; Reuter, S.; Grundmann, H.; Scott, J.A.G.; de Kraker, M.E.; Whitelaw, A. Mortality associated with third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections at one South African hospital. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 29, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gold, J.M.; Hall, M.; Shah, S.S.; Thomson, J.; Subramony, A.; Mahant, S.; Mittal, V.; Wilson, K.M.; Morse, R.; Mussman, G.M.; et al. Long length of hospital stay in children with medical complexity. J. Hosp. Med. 2016, 11, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Triantafyllou, C.; Chorianopoulou, E.; Kourkouni, E.; Zaoutis, T.E.; Kourlaba, G. Prevalence, incidence, length of stay and cost of healthcare-acquired pressure ulcers in pediatric populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2021, 115, 103843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wald-Dickler, N.; Holtom, P.D.; Phillips, M.C.; Centor, R.M.; Lee, R.A.; Baden, R.; Spellberg, B. Oral Is the New IV. Challenging Decades of Blood and Bone Infection Dogma: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Med. 2022, 135, 369–379.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shrayteh, Z.M.; Rahal, M.K.; Malaeb, D.N. Practice of switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics. Springerplus 2014, 3, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Høgli, J.U.; Garcia, B.H.; Skjold, F.; Skogen, V.; Småbrekke, L. An audit and feedback intervention study increased adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines at a Norwegian hospital. BMC Infect Dis. 2016, 16, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Van Dijck, C.; Vlieghe, E.; Cox, J.A. Antibiotic stewardship interventions in hospitals in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Bull. World Health Organ. 2018, 96, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Saleem, Z.; Godman, B.; Cook, A.; Khan, M.A.; Campbell, S.M.; Seaton, R.A.; Siachalinga, L.; Haseeb, A.; Amir, A.; Kurdi, A.; et al. Ongoing Efforts to Improve Antimicrobial Utilization in Hospitals among African Countries and Implications for the Future. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kerr, F.; Sefah, I.A.; Essah, D.O.; Cockburn, A.; Afriyie, D.; Mahungu, J.; Mirfenderesky, M.; Ankrah, D.; Aggor, A.; Barrett, S.; et al. Practical Pharmacist-Led Interventions to Improve Antimicrobial Stewardship in Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. Pharmacy 2021, 9, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sefah, I.A.; Chetty, S.; Yamoah, P.; Bangalee, V. The impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on appropriate use of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Syst. Rev. 2024, 13, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pinto Jimenez, C.; Pearson, M.; Hennessey, M.; Nkereuwem, E.; Crocker, C.; Egbujo, U.; Hendriks, J.; Smith, S.; Whanpuch, P.; Manongi, R.; et al. Awareness of antibiotic resistance: A tool for measurement among human and animal health care professionals in LMICs and UMICs. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023, 78, 620–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. GSS Ghana 2021 Population and Housing Census. Ghana Statistical Services. Available online: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ghana-population-and-housing-census-2021#:~:text=The%20Ghana%202021%20Population%20and%20Housing%20Census%20was,2021%20and%20recorded%20a%20total%20population%20of%2030%2C832%2C019 (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  106. Versporten, A.; Zarb, P.; Caniaux, I.; Gros, M.F.; Drapier, N.; Miller, M.; Jarlier, V.; Nathwani, D.; Goossens, H.; Koraqi, A.; et al. Antimicrobial consumption and resistance in adult hospital inpatients in 53 countries: Results of an internet-based global point prevalence survey. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e619–e629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Global PPS. Documents. Available online: https://www.global-pps.com/documents/ (accessed on 5 February 2025).
  108. WHO. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/tools/atc-ddd-toolkit/atc-classification (accessed on 6 February 2025).
  109. Chizimu, J.Y.; Mudenda, S.; Yamba, K.; Lukwesa, C.; Chanda, R.; Nakazwe, R.; Shawa, M.; Chambaro, H.; Kamboyi, H.K.; Kalungia, A.C.; et al. Antibiotic use and adherence to the WHO AWaRe guidelines across 16 hospitals in Zambia: A point prevalence survey. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2024, 6, dlae170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Foxlee, N.D.; Townell, N.; Heney, C.; McIver, L.; Lau, C.L. Strategies Used for Implementing and Promoting Adherence to Antibiotic Guidelines in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2021, 6, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and their association with guideline compliance.
Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and their association with guideline compliance.
VariableTotal, n (%)Compliance with the Guidelinep-Value
Age (years), mean ± SD2.39 ± 2.99Yes, n (%)No, n (%)
Duration of admission (days), mean ± SD9.14 ± 10.73
Duration of antibiotics (days), mean ± SD3.03 ± 2.43
Age (years) (n = 319) 0.393
      0–2219 (68.65)99 (45.21)120 (54.79)
      3–553 (16.61)20 (37.74)33 (62.26)
      6–826 (8.15)10 (38.46)16 (61.54)
      9–1121 (6.58)6 (28.57)15 (71.43)
Gender (n = 319) 0.591
      Male174 (54.55)76 (43.68)98 (56.32)
      Female145 (45.45)59 (40.69)86 (59.31)
Residence (n = 318) 0.836
      Rural149 (46.86)62 (41.61)87 (58.39)
      Urban144 (45.28)61 (42.36)83 (57.64)
      Peri-urban25 (7.86)12 (48.00)13 (52.00)
Duration of admission (days) (n = 319) 0.569
      1–5153 (47.96)69 (45.10)84 (54.90)
      5–1087 (27.27)36 (41.38)51 (58.62)
      >1079 (24.76)30 (37.97)49 (62.03)
Treatment based on biomarker (n = 319) 0.304
      Yes308 (96.55)132 (42.86)176 (57.14)
      No11 (3.45)3 (27.27)8 (72.72)
If yes, (n = 308) 0.262
      WBC128 (41.56)49 (38.28)79 (61.72)
      WBC + CRP81 (26.30)38 (46.91)43 (53.09)
      WBC + urine R/E58 (18.83)25 (43.10)33 (56.90)
      WBC + CRP + urine R/E20 (6.49)7 (35.00)13 (65.00)
      Other21 (6.82)13 (61.90)8 (38.10)
Number of antibiotics (n = 319) 0.546
      1120 (37.62)46 (38.33)74 (61.67)
      2181 (56.74)83 (45.86)98 (54.14)
      315 (4.71)5 (33.33)10 (66.67)
      43 (0.93)1 (33.33)2 (66.67)
Antibiotic type (n = 319) <0.001 *
      Ceftriaxone66 (20.69)24 (36.36)42 (63.64)
      Cefotaxime + flucloxacillin51 (15.99)0 (0.00)51 (100.00)
      Ampicillin + gentamicin48 (15.05)48 (100.00)0 (0.00)
      Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid24 (7.52)10 (41.67)14 (58.33)
      Ceftriaxone + metronidazole21 (6.58)9 (42.86)12 (57.14)
      Other ^109 (34.17)44 (40.37)65 (59.63)
WHO AWaRe * category (n = 317) <0.001 *
      Access86 (27.13)63 (73.26)23 (26.74)
      Watch95 (29.97)40 (42.10)55 (57.89)
      Access + Watch136 (42.90)32 (23.53)104 (76.47)
Route of administration (n = 319) 0.009 *
      Intravenous264 (82.76)108 (40.91)156 (59.09)
      Oral15 (4.70)6 (40.00)9 (60.00)
      Topical5 (1.57)0 (0)5 (100.00)
      Intravenous + oral27 (8.46)19 (70.37)8 (29.63)
      Other8 (2.51)2 (25.00)6 (75.00)
Diagnosis (n = 319) <0.001 *
      Neonatal sepsis77 (24.14)33 (42.86)44 (57.14)
      Neonatal jaundice due to sepsis18 (5.64)11 (61.11)7 (38.89)
      Pneumonia46 (14.42)39 (84.78)7 (15.22)
      Surgical wound prophylaxis46 (14.42)2 (4.35)44 (95.65)
      Tonsillitis17 (5.33)11 (64.71)6 (35.29)
      Other #115 (36.05)44 (38.26)71 (61.74)
NB: p-values with the asterisk (*) symbol are statistically significant; #—other diagnosis included bacterial gastroenteritis (n = 6; 1.88%), cellulitis (n = 6; 1.88%), acute chest syndrome (n = 5; 1.57%), vaso-occlusive crisis (n = 5; 1.57%), burns (n = 3; 0.94%), acute gastritis (n = 3; 0.94%), chronic osteomyelitis (n = 2; 0.63%), urinary tract infections (n = 1; 0.31%), and cord sepsis (n = 1; 0.31%); ^—other antibiotics included amoxicillin + clavulanic acid + azithromycin (n = 6; 1.88%), ciprofloxacin + metronidazole (n = 6; 1.88%), ciprofloxacin (n = 5; 1.57%), ciprofloxacin + clindamycin (n = 4; 1.25%), benzylpenicillin (n = 3; 0.94%), phenoxymethylpenicillin (n = 3; 0.94%), amoxicillin (n = 2; 0.63%), ceftriaxone + azithromycin + flucloxacillin (n = 2; 0.63%) ceftriaxone + clindamycin + metronidazole (n = 2; 0.63%), cefuroxime + clindamycin (n = 2, 0.63%), and metronidazole (n = 2; 0.63%); * AWaRe = Access, Watch, Reserve [22]; WBC = white blood count; CRP = C-reactive protein; R/E = routine examination.
Table 2. Logistic regression between independent variables.
Table 2. Logistic regression between independent variables.
VariableaOR95% CIp-Value
Antibiotic name
        Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (R)1.00
        Ceftriaxone0.120.02–0.950.044 *
        Cefotaxime + flucloxacillin1.00
        Ampicillin + gentamicin1.00
        Ceftriaxone + metronidazole0.380.05–3.090.368
        Other0.350.07–1.860.220
WHO AWaRe category
        Access (R)1.00
        Watch1.280.27–5.970.757
        Access + Watch4.860.12–1.950.309
Route of administration
        Intravenous (R)1.00
        Oral0.540.14–2.030.361
        Topical1.00
        Intravenous + oral1.260.38–4.160.703
        Other0.380.05–2.610.322
Diagnosis
        Neonatal sepsis (R)1.00
        Neonatal jaundice due to sepsis1.00
        Pneumonia15.383.30–71.62<0.001 *
        Surgical wound prophylaxis0.070.01–0.420.004 *
        Tonsillitis1.00
Other1.800.50–6.530.371
NB: p-values with the asterisk (*) symbol are statistically significant; AWaRe = Access, Watch, Reserve [22]; R = reference variable.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sefah, I.A.; Bosrotsi, D.K.; Buabeng, K.O.; Godman, B.; Bangalee, V. Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Care in Ghana: A Call to Action for Stewardship in This Population. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080779

AMA Style

Sefah IA, Bosrotsi DK, Buabeng KO, Godman B, Bangalee V. Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Care in Ghana: A Call to Action for Stewardship in This Population. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(8):779. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080779

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sefah, Israel Abebrese, Dennis Komla Bosrotsi, Kwame Ohene Buabeng, Brian Godman, and Varsha Bangalee. 2025. "Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Care in Ghana: A Call to Action for Stewardship in This Population" Antibiotics 14, no. 8: 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080779

APA Style

Sefah, I. A., Bosrotsi, D. K., Buabeng, K. O., Godman, B., & Bangalee, V. (2025). Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Care in Ghana: A Call to Action for Stewardship in This Population. Antibiotics, 14(8), 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080779

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop