Next Article in Journal
Beyond the Spotlight: Enterobacter spp. as Overlooked Carbapenemase Producers in Europe
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance in the Era of Climate Change: Why We Should All Embrace and Integrate the One Health Approach in Clinical Practice?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Prevalence of hefA Efflux Pump Overexpression in Isolates of Helicobacter pylori Resistant to Clarithromycin

1
Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, CEMT-BIOREN, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4810296, Chile
2
Doctoral Program in Sciences with a Mention in Applied Cellular and Molecular Biology, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
3
Department of Basic Sciences, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4781218, Chile
5
Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Hernan Henriquez Aravena, Temuco 4781151, Chile
6
Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital de Villarrica, Villarrica 4930000, Chile
7
Gastroenterology Unit, Clinica Alemana de Temuco, Temuco 4810297, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(10), 1044; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101044 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 September 2025 / Revised: 13 October 2025 / Accepted: 16 October 2025 / Published: 18 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanism and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Helicobacter pylori is a cause of chronic gastric infections and gastrointestinal carcinogenesis, with a prevalence of 20–90% around the world. Its eradication is increasingly challenged by clarithromycin resistance, particularly in regions with high rates of antibiotic resistance. While clarithromycin resistance is primarily attributed to 23S rRNA mutations, secondary mechanisms such as efflux pumps remain understudied. The present study reports a high prevalence of hefA efflux pump overexpression as a main molecular basis of clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori isolates from southern Chile. Materials and Methods: A total of 102 H. pylori isolates were obtained from gastric biopsy cultures. Isolates were analyzed for clarithromycin susceptibility by MIC, the 23S rRNA mutations A2142G/A2143G by PCR-RFLP followed by sequencing, and hefA relative expression by qPCR. Results: Clarithromycin resistance was detected in 38% of isolates. Resistance was significantly associated with therapeutic failure and urban residence. While 44% of resistant isolates harbored A2142G/A2143G mutations, 56% did not, suggesting alternative resistance mechanisms. Mutation C2182T was identified in 11% resistant isolates, and increased hefA expression was observed in resistant strains without 23S rRNA mutations, indicating efflux pump dysregulation as a resistance mechanism. Conclusions: Our findings reveal a shift in epidemiology of clarithromycin resistance mechanisms in H. pylori that extends beyond classical 23S rRNA mutations to include efflux-mediated adaptive resistance as a contributing mechanism. The positive correlation between hefA overexpression and MIC elevation underscores its role in resistance. These findings have important implications for the efficacy of clarithromycin-based therapies and highlight the need to reassess empirical treatment strategies in response to emerging resistance patterns.

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori is a chronic infection that has become prevalent around the world, colonizing more than half of humanity [1]. Its prevalence is approximately 50% in developed countries and up to 90% in underdeveloped regions [2]. The presence of this bacterium is a critical factor in the carcinogenesis process for most patients who develop differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma, progressing through stages of chronic gastritis, atrophy, and metaplastic changes [3]. Consequently, the eradication of H. pylori is considered a public health priority at both global and national levels.
Antibiotic resistance is a key determinant in the failure of eradication treatments and the recurrence of H. pylori infections. Numerous susceptibility studies have assessed treatment efficacy in different regions, particularly concerning clarithromycin resistance [4]. In cases where resistance is present, therapeutic success rates can drop to 40% or lower. A meta-analysis conducted by Fischbach and Evans reported a 66.2% reduction in eradication rates when the bacterium exhibited resistance to clarithromycin [5]. Other studies determined that the eradication rate of H. pylori in clarithromycin-resistant strains is 32% lower than in sensitive strains. In general, regions with high antibiotic resistance face significantly reduced eradication rates with empirical treatments for H. pylori, unlike pre-treatment susceptibility studies, which show higher eradication rates, with differences up to 20% to 50% in effectiveness [6]. Factors such as antibiotic resistance and patient demographics likely contribute to these disparities. Notably, current treatment guidelines do not incorporate susceptibility testing for managing the infection, nor do they address a comprehensive understanding of resistance mechanisms.
Clarithromycin resistance is the most extensively studied mechanism contributing to H. pylori eradication failure [4]. Specific mutations inhibit clarithromycin’s action by preventing its binding to the ribosomal subunit responsible for protein synthesis [7]. Three primary mutations of 23S rRNA gene—A2142G, A2143G, and A2142C—are the main contributors to clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori. Each mutation confers varying levels of resistance, with reports of A2143G causing the most significant reduction in eradication rates (30.7%) and greatly impacting treatment outcomes [8]. Interestingly, mutations at position 2142 result in higher resistance levels (MIC > 64 µg/mL) compared to those at position 2143 [9]. Although 90% of clarithromycin resistance is attributed to these three mutations, other mutations have been identified, though their role in resistance remains controversial and lacks clinical validation [10]. A secondary mechanism associated with clarithromycin resistance involves efflux pumps, which reduce the intracellular concentration of the antibiotic [10]. This mechanism may or may not act synergistically with 23S rRNA mutations to exacerbate resistance. A study of 15 clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains revealed the expression of a Resistance-nodulation-division (RND) efflux pump, with a significant reduction in MIC values when pump inhibitors were applied [10]. Despite its relevance to clarithromycin resistance, this mechanism is less studied due to the complexity of phenotypic and molecular analyses and the limited availability of clinical evidence.
Global studies on clarithromycin susceptibility report resistance rates ranging from 15% in Sweden to 96% in Australia and 43% in Chile, with mean interregional variations in resistance exceeding 20% [11,12]. However, the molecular mechanisms driving resistance have not been comprehensively studied, especially in Latin American countries.
In this context, this study reports a potential epidemiological shift in the predominant mechanism of clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori isolates from dyspeptic patients in southern Chile, where the efflux mechanism was found to predominate over target-site mutations. This finding could redefine current perspectives on resistance pathways and inform more effective treatment and surveillance strategies.

2. Results

2.1. Clarithromycin Susceptibility

Resistance to clarithromycin (MIC > 0.25 μg/mL) was detected in 35.3% of the 102 H. pylori isolates analyzed, using a MIC50 of 0.125 μg/mL and a MIC90 of >32 μg/mL. The MIC range for clarithromycin susceptibility varied from <0.016 to >256 μg/mL. Sociodemographic analysis revealed a higher prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori isolates in patients living in urban areas (Table 1) with individuals being four times more likely to harbor a resistant strain compared to those living in rural areas (OR: 4.0000, IC: 1.1794–13.5657). Also, a statistically significant association was observed with therapeutic failure in these patients, demonstrating a 6.4-fold increased risk of clarithromycin resistance in patients previously exposed to the antibiotic (OR: 6.4000, IC (1.9356–21.1618).

2.2. 23S rRNA Mutations (A2142G, A2143G)

Genotyping of the 23S rRNA gene by PCR-RFLP was conducted on 86 isolates to identify the A2142G and A2143G mutations, including 27 clarithromycin-resistant and 59 clarithromycin-sensitive isolates. While the frequency of these mutations was significantly higher in clarithromycin-resistant as compared to clarithromycin-susceptible strains (44% vs. 5%; p < 0.0001), it is interesting that only 44% (n = 12) of the resistant isolates harbored one of these mutations (Figure 1). Specifically, 11 isolates (40.7%) exhibited the A2143G mutation, and one isolate (3.7%) exhibited the A2142G mutation. Interestingly, 5% (three clarithromycin-susceptible isolates) also showed the presence of these mutations, with one isolate (1.7%) harboring A2142G and two isolates (3.3%) harboring A2143G (Figure 1).
Notably, 55.6% (n = 15) of the clarithromycin-resistant strains did not exhibit either of the initially studied mutations. Sequencing of the V domain of the 23S rRNA gene in these isolates revealed eight-point mutations (A1826G, C1707T, C1822T, C1830T, G1821A, T1916G, T1916C, C2182T). However, when comparing the sequences of resistant and sensitive strains, only one mutation (C2182T) was consistently associated with clarithromycin resistance, as observed in three isolates (Hp187 MIC = 4 μg/mL, Hp309 MIC = 32 μg/mL, Hp575 MIC ≥ 256 μg/mL).

2.3. hefA Gene Expression

To investigate potential efflux mechanisms contributing to clarithromycin resistance, the transcriptional levels of the hefA gene were analyzed across different MIC levels of the bacterial isolates, covering the full range of observed susceptibility. A total of 19 isolates were quantified preserving the A2141G and A2143G mutation frequencies observed in the resistant cohort. Although no significant differences were observed in hefA expression between clarithromycin-sensitive and -resistant H. pylori groups, a significant increase in hefA mRNA expression was detected in a subset of resistant strains without 23S rRNA mutations (p = 0.041) (Figure 2). This suggests a dysregulation of the efflux system in bacteria lacking classical mutations of 23S rRNA.
Furthermore, a positive correlation (R = 0.92) was observed between hefA relative expression in strains without 23S rRNA mutations and clarithromycin MIC levels, indicating that hefA overexpression is associated with increased resistance in the absence of mutations (p = 0.002) (Figure 3).

3. Discussion

The increasing resistance to clarithromycin in H. pylori is a major concern highlighted in the Maastricht VI/Florence Consensus Report [13]. Our study observed a resistance rate of 38%, comparable to rates of 26–31% reported in Chile [14,15] and consistent with global trends exceeding 15% in most WHO regions [16]. Given that resistance rates above 20% are associated with a 30–60% reduction in eradication success [17]. This pattern is evident in the population studied, where one-third of patients harboring clarithromycin-resistant strains experienced treatment failure (Table 1). Our findings demonstrate a 6.8-fold increased risk of clarithromycin resistance among patients with prior exposure to the antibiotic treatment, underscoring the importance of considering antibiotic history when selecting treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection. Other authors corroborated the decrease in eradication rates when resistance rates surpassed 20% [15]. Local studies associated with our research group have reported a decline in eradication rates in recent years, prompting the need to reformulate empirical therapies [18].
From a demographic perspective, our findings highlight population characteristics associated with resistance to clarithromycin (Table 1), notably, a higher prevalence of resistant isolates in urban areas. These findings revealed a higher prevalence of resistant isolates in urban areas, where individuals were four times more likely to harbor resistant H. pylori strains. This disparity may reflect greater antibiotic exposure and environmental selective pressure, supported by studies showing higher macrolide resistance and abundance of resistance genes in urban wastewater [19,20].
Macrolide resistance in H. pylori has been predominantly attributed to point mutations in the 23S rRNA gene at positions 2142 and 2143 (A2142G, A2143G, A2142C) [21]. A secondary mechanism involving efflux pump systems has been less studied and reported with low prevalence [10,22]. In this context, our study provides new molecular insights into clarithromycin resistance in clinical H. pylori isolates, revealing a higher prevalence of this underlying mechanism.
The 23S rRNA point mutations were observed in only 45% of clarithromycin-resistant isolates, with the majority associated with A2142G, A2143G, and 3 strains with T2182C mutation [23]. Notably, 55% of resistant isolates without mutations exhibited possible adaptive resistance involving overexpression of the efflux pump system HefABC (Figure 1 and Figure 2). This predominance of the efflux mechanism over target-site mutations could represent a potential epidemiological shift in the predominant resistance mechanism of clarithromycin in H. pylori at the global level, now observed in the southern Chilean population studied.
The hefA gene has been associated with enhanced antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation, both reducing H. pylori susceptibility to macrolides [24]. Experimental data confirm that efflux pump inhibition can restore clarithromycin susceptibility, yet clinical evidence remains scarce. This is the first time a positive correlation has been described between efflux pump gene expression of clinical isolates and an increase in the MIC for clarithromycin (r = 0.92), suggesting the rise in resistance related to the dysregulation of the efflux pump system (Figure 3). This behavior is observed in various Gram-Negative bacilli exposed to macrolide, β-lactam, and quinolone antibiotics [25,26]. Studies on Gram-Negative strains have shown that membrane impermeability is an SOS response to the selective pressure exerted by these antibiotics. However, these mechanisms significantly impact bacterial fitness due to the nonspecific nature of efflux pumps. When overexpressed, these pumps expel various molecules that may be essential for bacterial survival [27]. This is why the need for definitive adaptation, such as the presence of mutations, allows bacteria to achieve greater survival stability, rather than relying solely on impermeability-based survival mechanisms [26,28]. This is consistent with our results, where no correlation was observed between hefA relative expression and MIC in A2142G/A2143G mutated isolates, showing a wide variation in hefA expression levels (Figure 2). It is important to mention that HefA efflux pump has been linked to the reduction in intracellular concentrations of various structurally unrelated drugs, bile salts, and metal ions, meaning it would not act as a specific antimicrobial mechanism in H. pylori [29].
The overexpression of hefA as a resistance mechanism to clarithromycin, in the absence of A2142G/A2143G mutations in clinical isolates of H. pylori from southern Chile, could be triggered by phenotypic instability due to constant exposure. Bacteria may continue to overexpress efflux pumps even in the absence of the stimulating drug [30]. This is why the high phenotypic resistance rates observed in this region, may be linked to regulatory mechanisms of membrane impermeability due to prior exposure to these compounds.
Chile is one of the countries with the highest per capita macrolide consumption in the region [31]. This prolonged exposure could promote overexpression of efflux pumps in gastric isolates. Further comprehensive studies are needed to fully understand the dynamics of this mechanism in H. pylori.
Our findings strongly suggest that these resistance mechanisms are influencing the bacterium’s susceptibility to clarithromycin, where 56% of resistant strains were not linked to classical mutations (A2142G and A2143G) of 23S rRNA gene. This perspective on clarithromycin resistance in clinical isolates observed in our population could have significant implications for surveillance strategies and therapeutic decision-making, especially if susceptibility studies are limited to genetic studies of classical mutations. In populations with poorly regulated antibiotic use, the selective pressure of antibiotic exposure poses a real risk to the development of emerging resistance mechanisms.
The main limitation of our study is the absence of phenotypic validation of efflux pump activity (e.g., MIC determination with RND inhibitors or EtBr accumulation/efflux assays). Thus, transcriptional upregulation is interpreted as suggestive of contributing mechanisms. Further molecular and functional research linking this mechanism to treatment failure is necessary to confirm its clinical significance and optimize treatment strategies, particularly considering that this predominance of the efflux mechanism over target-site mutations represents a potential epidemiological shift in the predominant resistance mechanism of clarithromycin in H. pylori at the global level, now observed in the southern Chilean population studied.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients Recruitment and Obtention of Biological Samples

A total of 102 H. pylori isolates were obtained from gastric biopsy cultures of adult dyspeptic patients undergoing endoscopy at three major health institutions in the La Araucanía Region of southern Chile. Patients were included in the study after signing the informed consent previously approved by the Bioethical Committee of Universidad de La Frontera, Chile (Number No. 102/2019). All patients were over 18 years old, and they had not taken antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors within three weeks prior to endoscopy. Before sample collection, individuals were questioned about their sociodemographic characteristics, such as their highest level of education, main occupation, gender, age, race, Mapuche ethnicity, and location of residence. Questions about clinical history included current medications, history of gastric cancer, history of H. pylori infection, and treatments for the bacteria to evaluate previous management of H. pylori. All recruitment and biological samples obtentions were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki statements.

4.2. Culture and Phenotypic Identification of H. pylori

Biopsy samples were macerated, homogenized, and inoculated onto Columbia blood agar (DIFCO, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 7% horse blood and selective antibiotics for H. pylori, including trimethoprim, amphotericin B, polymyxin B (5 µg/mL each), and vancomycin (10 µg/mL) (DENT Supplement, Thermo. Scientific™ Oxoid™, Hampshire, UK). Cultures were incubated for 5–10 days at 37 °C under microaerophilic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2, and 90% humidity) using commercial systems (Campypack, Thermo. Scientific™ Oxoid™, Hampshire, UK). Growth suggestive of H. pylori was confirmed through phenotypic tests, including oxidase, catalase, and Gram staining to assess bacterial morphology. Presumptive H. pylori isolates were suspended in Columbia broth with 5% horse serum and 20% glycerol and stored at −80 °C until use.

4.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic susceptibility was evaluated using the epsilometry method (E-test, Thermo. Scientific™ Oxoid™, Hampshire, UK) to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of clarithromycin, following the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines [32]. Fresh colonies were suspended in sterile distilled water to achieve a standard bacterial concentration of 3 McFarland (9.0 × 108 CFU/mL). MIC values were interpreted using clinical breakpoints for clarithromycin resistance (>0.25 µg/mL). H. pylori ATCC 43504 was used as a quality control strain.

4.4. DNA Extraction from Pure Culture

DNA was extracted from isolated strains using the UltraClean® Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C.

4.5. Molecular Confirmation of H. pylori

Extracted DNA was used for species confirmation by PCR amplification of the ureC gene using the primers FExt: 5′-AGCTATAAAGTGGGCGAGAG-3′ and RExt: 5′-ATTGCCCGTTAGGCTCAT-3′. PCR amplifications were conducted under conventional conditions as described by researchers [33]. Amplified products were visualized using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

4.6. RFLP Analysis for A2142G and A2143G Mutations

A conventional PCR was performed to detect the V domain of the 23S rRNA gene using primers F: 5′-AGATTGGAGGGAAGGCAAAT-3′ and R: 5′-CTCCATAAGAGCCAAAGCCC-3′. Amplification conditions included one cycle of denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were visualized on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was conducted using BbsI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and BsaI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) to study A2142G and A2143G mutations, respectively, as predicted by NEBcutter V2.0 (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). PCR products were incubated with restriction enzymes following the manufacturer’s instructions, and fragments were visualized on 1% agarose gel.

4.7. 23S rRNA Gene Sequencing

For strains with no mutations detected by RFLP, the V region of the 23S rRNA gene was sequenced to identify other potential mutations. PCR products were purified using the Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) and sequenced at Macrogen Korea® (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Sequencing data were analyzed with MEGA 11.0 software and compared to the NCBI database.

4.8. hefA Gene Relative Expression

Total RNA was extracted from cultures in exponential growth using the E.Z.N.A.® Total RNA Kit I (OMEGA Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA). RNA quantity and purity were assessed using the QuantiFluor RNA System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). RNA samples were treated with DNase (Ambion, Thermo Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA) and reverse transcribed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Quantitative PCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR System and SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Thermo. Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA). The 16S rRNA gene was used as a housekeeping gene with primers F: 5′-GCGGGATAGTCAGTCAGGTCAGGTG-3′ and R: 5′-CATCGTTTAGGGCGTGGACT-3′. hefA relative expression was assessed using primers designed for this study (F: 5′-CTCGCTCGCATGATCGC-3′ and R: 5′-CGTATTCGCTCAAATTCCCT-3′). PCR conditions included one cycle at 50 °C for 2 min, one cycle at 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, and a final step at 60 °C for 1 min. Dissociation curves confirmed amplification specificity. Relative mRNA expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method with non-induced isolates as the calibrator [34].

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in the program Minitab®18 and GraphPad Prism 8.0. The chi-square test of association was used to establish differences between the sociodemographic characteristics with an established degree of significance of p < 0.05. To determine variables associated with the risk of harboring a Clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection, binary logistic regression models were adjusted, obtaining the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence intervals. Clarithromycin susceptibility and prevalence data were analyzed descriptively to determine MIC50 and MIC90 values, and the presence of A2142G and A2143G mutations was associated with antibiotic resistance using Fisher’s exact test. hefA gene relative expression differences between resistant and sensitive, as well as mutated and non-mutated, strains were analyzed using Mann–Whitney and t-tests. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism software, with significance set at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the evolving landscape of clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori isolated in southern Chile. The resistance rate observed in our population aligns with global trends, where the emergence of alternative resistance mechanisms, such as efflux pump overexpression, is becoming increasingly prevalent. The majority of resistant isolates in our study did not exhibit classical 23S rRNA mutations but instead demonstrated adaptive gene expression of impermeability membrane mechanisms, particularly involving the HefABC efflux pump system. These findings suggest that relying solely on genetic studies of classical mutations may underestimate the complexity of resistance in H. pylori, highlighting the need for broader approaches in susceptibility testing.
The impact of prolonged antibiotic exposure could be related to our findings, where efflux pump overexpression may be driven by selective pressure, particularly in urban regions with high antibiotic consumption. This has significant implications for the efficacy of clarithromycin-based therapies and underscores the importance of revisiting empirical treatment strategies in light of emerging resistance patterns. While this study provides valuable insights into the resistance mechanisms of H. pylori, further research is needed to explore the clinical significance and functional analysis of efflux pump-mediated resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C. and M.P.; Methodology, A.C. and M.P.; Validation, M.V., C.O., A.C. and M.P.; Formal Analysis, M.V., C.O., A.C. and M.P.; Investigation M.V., C.O., R.S., C.L., K.G., L.B., D.G., L.C., E.H., A.S. and M.P.; Resources, A.C. and M.P.; Data Curation, M.V., C.O., E.H. and M.P.; Project administration and supervision M.P.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.V., C.O. and M.P.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.V., C.O., C.L., A.C. and M.P.; Funding Acquisition, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT), Project No. 11191199, from the National Agency for Research and Development of Chile (ANID). The APC was funded by Research Department (DIUFRO) of Universidad de La Frontera.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidad de La Frontera (Number No. 102/2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence repository ID: PV156774, PV156775, PV156776, PV156777, PV156778, PV156779 Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore (accessed on: 28 February 2025).

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this work the author(s) used ChatGPT (modelo GPT-4-turbo Open AI 2025) in order to Improve language. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication. Our acknowledgment to Sophie Baggett for her exhaustive English-grammar revision of the final text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
RFLPRestriction fragment length polymorphism
WHOWorld Health Organization
ARGantibiotic resistance genes
H. pyloriHelicobacter pylori

References

  1. Hooi, J.K.Y.; Lai, W.Y.; Ng, W.K.; Suen, M.M.Y.; Underwood, F.E.; Tanyingoh, D.; Malfertheiner, P.; Graham, D.Y.; Wong, V.W.S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Katelaris, P.; Hunt, R.; Bazzoli, F.; Cohen, H.; Fock, K.M.; Gemilyan, M.; Malfertheiner, P.; Mégraud, F.; Piscoya, A.; Quach, D.; et al. Helicobacter pylori world gastroenterology organization global guideline. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2023, 57, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ford, A.C.; Yuan, Y.; Forman, D.; Hunt, R.; Moayyedi, P. Helicobacter pylori eradication for the prevention of gastric neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 7, CD005583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kocsmár, É.; Buzás, G.M.; Szirtes, I.; Kocsmár, I.; Kramer, Z.; Szijártó, A.; Fadgyas-Freyler, P.; Szénás, K.; Rugge, M.; Fassan, M.; et al. Primary and secondary clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori and mathematical modeling of the role of macrolides. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fischbach, L.; Evans, E.L. Meta-analysis: The effect of antibiotic resistance status on the efficacy of triple and quadruple first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 26, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zou, Y.; Qian, X.; Liu, X.; Song, Y.; Song, C.; Wu, S.; An, Y.; Yuan, R.; Wan, Y.; Xie, Y. The effect of antibiotic resistance on Helicobacter pylori eradication efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Helicobacter 2020, 25, e12714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Versalovic, J.; Shortridge, D.; Kibler, K.; Griffy, M.V.; Beyer, J.; Flamm, R.K.; Tanaka, S.K.; Graham, D.Y. Mutations in 23S rRNA are associated with clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996, 40, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Alfaresi, M.S.; Eltom, A.A.; Alshaikh, S.S.; Buchel, E.H.; Saeed, L.S.; Aljenaibi, M.M. Molecular prevalence of point mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin in Helicobacter pylori in the United Arab Emirates. Saudi Med. J. 2005, 26, 763–766. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Hu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Lu, B.; Dai, J. Helicobacter pylori and antibiotic resistance, a continuing and intractable problem. Helicobacter 2016, 21, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hirata, K.; Suzuki, H.; Nishizawa, T.; Tsugawa, H.; Muraoka, H.; Saito, Y.; Matsuzaki, J.; Hibi, T. Contribution of efflux pumps to clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 25, S75–S79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thung, I.; Aramin, H.; Vavinskaya, V.; Gupta, S.; Park, J.Y.; Crowe, S.E.; Valasek, M.A. The global emergence of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 43, 514–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Oporto, M.; Pavez, M.; Troncoso, C.; Cerda, A.; Hofmann, E.; Sierralta, A.; Rios, E.; Coppelli, L.; Barrientos, L. Prevalence of infection and antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori: An evaluation in public and private health systems of southern Chile. Pathogens 2019, 8, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Malfertheiner, P.; Megraud, F.; Rokkas, T.; Gisbert, J.P.; Liou, J.M.; Schulz, C.; Gasbarrini, A.; Hunt, R.H.; Leja, M.; O´Morain, C.; et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: The Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report. Gut 2022, 71, 1724–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Parra-Sepúlveda, C.; Merino, J.S.; Sáez-Carrillo, K.; González, C.; García-Cancino, A. Antibiotic resistance surveillance of Helicobacter pylori at the Biobío region (Chile) in a decade. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2019, 56, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arenas, A.; Serrano, C.; Quiñones, L.; Harris, P.; Sandoval, M.; Lavanderos, M.; Sepúlveda, R.; Maquilón, S.; Echeverría, A.; Ríos, C.; et al. High prevalence of clarithromycin resistance and effect on Helicobacter pylori eradication in a population from Santiago, Chile: Cohort study and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Savoldi, A.; Carrara, E.; Graham, D.Y.; Conti, M.; Tacconelli, E. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A systematic review and meta-analysis in World Health Organization regions. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 1372–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Malfertheiner, P.; Mégraud, F.; O’Morain, C.A.; Gisbert, J.P.; Kuipers, E.J.; Axon, A.T.; Bazzoli, F.; Gasbarrini, A.; Atherton, J.; Graham, D.Y.; et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—The Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut 2017, 66, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Villalón, A.; Reyes, D.; Ortiz, J.; Gándara, V.; Díaz, L.; Chahuán, J.; Pizarro, M.; Riquelme, A. Tratamiento y manejo de la infección por Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterol. Latinoam. 2020, 31, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lubell, Y.; Turner, P.; Ashley, E.A.; White, N.J. Susceptibility of bacterial isolates from community-acquired infections in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia to macrolide antibiotics. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2011, 16, 1192–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Y.; Lu, S.; Qin, P.; Guo, X.; Bi, B.; Wang, L.; Xi, B.; Wu, F.; et al. Occurrence and fate of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in typical urban water of Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 246, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Boyanova, L.; Hadzhiyski, P.; Gergova, R.; Markovska, R. Evolution of Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics: A topic of increasing concern. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gong, X.; Wang, Y.; An, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, D.; Yong, X. The crosstalk between efflux pump and resistance gene mutation in Helicobacter pylori. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2379439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Albasha, A.M.; Elnosh, M.M.; Osman, E.H.; Zeinalabdin, D.M.; Fadl, A.A.; Ali, M.A.; Altayb, H.N. Helicobacter pylori 23S rRNA gene A2142G, A2143G, T2182C, and C2195T mutations associated with clarithromycin resistance detected in Sudanese patients. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Krzyżek, P. Helicobacter pylori efflux pumps: A double-edged sword in antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pagès, J.M.; James, C.E.; Winterhalter, M. The porin and the permeating antibiotic: A selective diffusion barrier in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pavez, M.; Vieira, C.; de Araujo, M.R.; Cerda, A.; de Almeida, L.M.; Lincopan, N.; Mamizuka, E.M. Molecular mechanisms of membrane impermeability in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae exposed to imipenem selective pressure. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 48, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dam, S.; Pagès, J.M.; Masi, M. Stress responses, outer membrane permeability control and antimicrobial resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Microbiology 2018, 164, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kinana, A.D.; Vargiu, A.V.; Nikaido, H. Effect of site-directed mutations in multidrug efflux pump AcrB examined by quantitative efflux assays. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 480, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alfaray, R.I.; Saruuljavkhlan, B.; Fauzia, K.A.; Torres, R.C.; Thorell, K.; Dewi, S.R.; Kryukov, K.A.; Matsumoto, T.; Akada, J.; Vilaichone, R.; et al. Global antimicrobial resistance gene study of Helicobacter pylori: Comparison of detection tools, ARG and efflux pump gene analysis, worldwide epidemiological distribution, and information related to the antimicrobial-resistant phenotype. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nikaido, H.; Pagès, J.M. Broad-specificity efflux pumps and their role in multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 340–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marin, G.H.; Giangreco, L.; Dorati, C.; Mordujovich, P.; Boni, S.; Mantilla-Ponte, H.; Alfonso Arvez, M.J.; Lopez Peña, M.; Aldunate González, M.F.; Ching Fung, S.M.; et al. Antimicrobial consumption in Latin American countries: First steps of a long road ahead. J. Prim. Care Community Health 2022, 13, 21501319221082346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 15.0. 2025. Available online: https://www.eucast.org (accessed on 25 January 2025).
  33. Wormwood, T.; Parra, Á.; Bresky, G.; Madariaga, J.A.; Häberle, S.; Flores, J.; Bernal, G. Prevalencia de cepas cagA-positivo en la región de Coquimbo, determinada mediante nested-qPCR en muestras fecales. Rev. Méd. Chile 2018, 146, 596–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Association between the presence of A2142G and/or A2143G mutations of 23S rRNA and clarithromycin susceptibility profile in H. pylori strains. Data represent the frequencies of wild-type or A2142G/A2143G mutant strains in Clarithromycin-resistant and Clarithromycin-susceptible isolates. Data are presented as percentage and were compared using chi-square test.
Figure 1. Association between the presence of A2142G and/or A2143G mutations of 23S rRNA and clarithromycin susceptibility profile in H. pylori strains. Data represent the frequencies of wild-type or A2142G/A2143G mutant strains in Clarithromycin-resistant and Clarithromycin-susceptible isolates. Data are presented as percentage and were compared using chi-square test.
Antibiotics 14 01044 g001
Figure 2. Relative expression of hefA in H. pylori strains classified as either clarithromycin-susceptible or clarithromycin-resistant, with and without A2142G/A2143G mutations. Data represent dispersion graph with bars indicating median values. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare values between clarithromycin-susceptible and resistant and between wild-type and A2142G/A2143G mutant strains into each group.
Figure 2. Relative expression of hefA in H. pylori strains classified as either clarithromycin-susceptible or clarithromycin-resistant, with and without A2142G/A2143G mutations. Data represent dispersion graph with bars indicating median values. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare values between clarithromycin-susceptible and resistant and between wild-type and A2142G/A2143G mutant strains into each group.
Antibiotics 14 01044 g002
Figure 3. Association between Clarithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and hefA gene expression in strains without 23S rRNA mutation.
Figure 3. Association between Clarithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and hefA gene expression in strains without 23S rRNA mutation.
Antibiotics 14 01044 g003
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of patients according to clarithromycin susceptibility profile against H. pylori.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of patients according to clarithromycin susceptibility profile against H. pylori.
BackgroundPatients with Clarithromycin Resistant Strains
n = 36
Patients with Clarithromycin Sensitive Strains
n = 66
p Value
Age (years)47.2 ± 13.749.2 ± 12.20.466
Sex (female)20 (55.56%)49 (74.24%)0.054
Urban residence32 (88.9%)43 (64.7%)0.012 *ƚ
Education level ≤ 12 years20 (57.1%)46 (74.2%)0.084
Public health insurance28 (80%)60 (92.3%)0.071
Family group ≥ 5 members6 (17.1%)7 (10.8%)0.366
Smoker7 (19.4%)24 (36.9%)0.068
Drinker17 (47.2%)35(53.8%)0.524
Previous treatment for H. pylori12 (33.3%)5 (7.6%)0.001 *ƚƚ
* statistically significant; ƚ OR: 4.0000, IC: 1.1794–13.5657; ƚƚ OR: 6.4000, IC: 1.9356–21.1618.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villegas, M.; Ortega, C.; Gómez, K.; Cerda, A.; Sepúlveda, R.; Lara, C.; Bustamante, L.; Garcia, D.; Coppelli, L.; Hofmann, E.; et al. High Prevalence of hefA Efflux Pump Overexpression in Isolates of Helicobacter pylori Resistant to Clarithromycin. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101044

AMA Style

Villegas M, Ortega C, Gómez K, Cerda A, Sepúlveda R, Lara C, Bustamante L, Garcia D, Coppelli L, Hofmann E, et al. High Prevalence of hefA Efflux Pump Overexpression in Isolates of Helicobacter pylori Resistant to Clarithromycin. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(10):1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villegas, Marcela, Catalina Ortega, Krishna Gómez, Alvaro Cerda, Rolando Sepúlveda, Christian Lara, Luis Bustamante, Daniela Garcia, Luis Coppelli, Edmundo Hofmann, and et al. 2025. "High Prevalence of hefA Efflux Pump Overexpression in Isolates of Helicobacter pylori Resistant to Clarithromycin" Antibiotics 14, no. 10: 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101044

APA Style

Villegas, M., Ortega, C., Gómez, K., Cerda, A., Sepúlveda, R., Lara, C., Bustamante, L., Garcia, D., Coppelli, L., Hofmann, E., Sierralta, A., & Pavez, M. (2025). High Prevalence of hefA Efflux Pump Overexpression in Isolates of Helicobacter pylori Resistant to Clarithromycin. Antibiotics, 14(10), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101044

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop