Next Article in Journal
Virtual Screening of Potential RoxS Inhibitors and Evaluation of Their Antimicrobial Activity in Combination with Antibiotics against Clinically Resistant Bacteria
Next Article in Special Issue
Deciphering Microbiome, Transcriptome, and Metabolic Interactions in the Presence of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus against Salmonella Typhimurium in a Murine Model
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Tran et al. Antimicrobial Properties of Bacillus Probiotics as Animal Growth Promoters. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 407
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial Resistance, Biofilm Formation, and Virulence Determinants in Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Cultured and Wild Fish
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli from Raw Cow Milk in Namwala District, Zambia: Public Health Implications

Antibiotics 2023, 12(9), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091421
by Wizaso Mwasinga 1,*, Misheck Shawa 2, Patrick Katemangwe 1, Herman Chambaro 3, Prudence Mpundu 4, Ethel M’kandawire 1, Chisoni Mumba 1 and Musso Munyeme 1
Antibiotics 2023, 12(9), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091421
Submission received: 16 June 2023 / Revised: 7 July 2023 / Accepted: 10 July 2023 / Published: 8 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance of Foodborne Bacteria and Food Safety)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thirty two E. coli strains were resistant to cefotaxime by disk diffusion; however, only 14 strains presented low sensitivity to the antimicrobial when the microdilution method was used. Furthermore, only 5 and 6 E. coli strains presented the bla-CTX-M and bla-TEM genes, respectively. How do you explain: first, the difference in the phenotypic results between the two methods used and second, the lack of detection of beta lactamases genes in all these resistant isolates to cefotaxime?

Authors have to meticulously check references, correctly spell the names of microorganisms and genes

I don´t have comments

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Nevertheless, much work has been done on reporting resistance in E. coli, however, the present article may be important for the Zambia point of view. It reports the rise in MDR E coli recovered from cow milk. This reviewer has following comments to make. 

"Data" term should be taken as plural. "Were" should be used for data, instead of was.

Methods should include a schematic map of Zambia showing the concerned district and pinpointing the locations of milk collection units. 

The manuscript should cite a few relevant citations from 2023 as well.

Discussion section should discuss the factors which promote resistance in isolates in the nearby countries with reference to Zambia. If Zambia, Tanzania, Namibia, Zimbabwe share some animal movement between their borders? 

It is suggested to include the limitations of the study in the Discussion section. 

Minor improvements required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop