Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Critical-Illness: Combined Effects of Colistin and Vasoactive Drugs: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Cranberry/Chondroitin Sulfate Co-precipitate as a New Method for Controlling Urinary Tract Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aerosolized Antibiotics to Manage Ventilator-Associated Infections: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/antibiotics12061056
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Features and Outcomes of VAP Due to Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella spp.: A Retrospective Study Comparing Monobacterial and Polybacterial Episodes

by
Dalia Adukauskiene
1,†,
Ausra Ciginskiene
1,*,†,
Agne Adukauskaite
2,
Despoina Koulenti
3,4 and
Jordi Rello
5,6,*
1
Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
3
Second Critical Care Department, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
4
UQ Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The Univesrity of Queensland, 4029 Brisbane, Australia
5
Vall d‘Hebron Institute of Research, Vall d‘Hebron Campus Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
6
Clinical Research, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(6), 1056; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12061056
Submission received: 10 May 2023 / Revised: 10 June 2023 / Accepted: 13 June 2023 / Published: 15 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Based Strategies for Prevention or Therapy of MDR Pneumonia)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
VAP due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is a frequent infection among patients in ICUs. Patient characteristics and mortality in mono- and polybacterial cases of VAP may differ. A single-centre, retrospective 3-year study was conducted in the four ICUs of a Lithuanian referral university hospital, aiming to compare both the clinical features and the 60-day ICU all-cause mortality of monobacterial and polybacterial MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP episodes. Of the 86 MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP episodes analyzed, 50 (58.1%) were polybacterial. The 60-day mortality was higher (p < 0.05) in polybacterial episodes: overall (50.0 vs. 27.8%), in the sub-group with less-severe disease (SOFA < 8) at VAP onset (45.5 vs. 15.0%), even with appropriate treatment (41.7 vs. 12.5%), and the sub-group of extended drug-resistant (XDR) Klebsiella spp. (46.4 vs. 17.6%). The ICU mortality (44.0 vs. 22.5%) was also higher in the polybacterial episodes. The monobacterial MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP was associated (p < 0.05) with prior hospitalization (61.1 vs. 40.0%), diabetes mellitus (30.6 vs. 5.8%), obesity (30.6 vs. 4.7%), prior antibiotic therapy (77.8 vs. 52.0%), prior treatment with cephalosporins (66.7 vs. 36.0%), and SOFA cardiovascular ≥ 3 (44.4 vs. 10.0%) at VAP onset. Patients with polybacterial VAP were more likely (p < 0.05) to be comatose (22.2 vs. 52.0%) and had a higher SAPS II score (median [IQR] 45.0 [35.25–51.1] vs. 50.0 [40.5–60.75]) at VAP onset. Polybacterial MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP had distinct demographic and clinical characteristics compared to monobacterial, and was associated with poorer outcomes.

1. Introduction

Patients treated in intensive care units (ICU) have a higher risk of infections, due to increased requirements for invasive devices, expressed selective antibacterial pressure, and significant immunosuppression because of the critical illness. Despite improved preventive efforts, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains the most common ICU infection of patients on mechanical ventilation (MV), and is associated with substantial morbidity/mortality, a longer length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, and also increased healthcare costs, especially in VAP caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria [1,2,3,4].
Based on the data from recent multicentre European studies, the most common (80%) VAP pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) [5,6]. Moreover, up to 70% of all hospital-acquired infections (HAI) were caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), with Klebsiella spp. strains representing up to 10% of them [5]. This threatening pathogen of VAP, accounting for around 10% of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and VAP cases, is associated with a constantly rising rate of multidrug resistance [7]. In 2022, data derived from the Lithuanian Institute of Hygiene revealed that Klebsiella spp. was the dominating (20%) pathogen in pneumonias of ICU patients [8].
The increasing incidence of Klebsiella spp. infections and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains have brought this pathogen to the forefront of attention [9,10]. According to the 2019 data of EARS-NET, more than a third (36.6%) of Klebsiella spp. strains reported in the EU/EEA were found to be resistant to one or more of the antibacterial groups under surveillance (third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems) [11]. The rate of MDR isolates of Klebsiella spp. varies between countries, predominating in Eastern and South-Western Europe. In Mediterranean countries, the resistance of Klebsiella spp. strains to the third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides has exceeded 65%. The resistance of Klebsiella spp. to carbapenems has increased seven-fold since 2006 [12]. Consequently, extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales, including Klebsiella spp., as well as carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, have been recognized by the WHO as major challenges for the future [13].
Previous studies indicate that the outcomes of VAP patients depend not only on patient-related factors (demographic data, comorbidities, socioeconomic conditions) and disease severity, but also on the specific causative bacterium, its antibiotic resistance, and virulence [14,15]. Yet, the point of view that MDR pathogens are associated with higher mortality, remains controversial until now. Numerous studies have confirmed this association in settings of various infections [1,16,17,18]. The published data show that nearly a quarter of VAP cases are of polybacterial origin [19,20]. Critical illness-induced immunosuppression is thought to increase the risk of polybacterial pulmonary infections. Early administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy in the cases of polybacterial infections may be challenging, because the co-pathogens may have different susceptibilities to antibiotics. There is a scarcity of scientific studies that examine the distinctions between polybacterial and monobacterial infections. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the polybacterial origin of infection is associated with increased disease severity and worse patient outcomes [1,16,17,18,21]. More than two decades ago, a 1.5-year-duration study in French ICUs found no differences in mortality of mono- and polybacterial VAP [19]. However, a recent study by Karakonstantis et al. on pulmonary and bloodstream infections (BSI) has shown that the type of pathogen isolation (monobacterial or polybacterial) may be associated with outcomes [22]. Infections due to MDR Klebsiella spp. were found to be associated with high mortality and hospital outbreaks [18,23]. Despite the clinical relevance of Klebsiella spp., there is a considerable gap in knowledge of differences in outcomes and clinical features of mono- vs. polybacterial cases of VAP, due to MDR Klebsiella spp. No comparable multicentre studies have been published.
The hypothesis of our study is that mortality and clinical characteristics of patients with VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. differ between monobacterial and polybacterial cases. A potential approach to evaluating these differences is to compare the outcome of patients with monobacterial VAP to those with polybacterial. Time points that are too early might not capture late mortality, due to infection-related complications. For that reason, the primary objective of the current study was to compare the all-cause 60-day mortality between mono- and polybacterial episodes of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. The secondary objective was to compare the ICU mortality and various clinical aspects of mono- and polybacterial VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp.

2. Materials and Methods

A secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of medical records of patients that were admitted to the 72-bed adult ICU (medical-surgical, neurosurgical, cardiosurgical, and coronary) was conducted at Lithuania’s largest (2300-bed) university-affiliated hospital over a three-year period (from January 2014 to December 2016). The study was approved by the Kaunas Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (No. BE-2-13). The need for written consent was waived, due to the study’s observational nature.
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age ≥ 18 years, (2) the first episode of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. Pneumonia was defined as ventilator-associated when it occurred after 48 or more hours after endotracheal intubation and the onset of mechanical ventilation. The clinical diagnosis of VAP was made according to the 2005 ATS/IDSA criteria [24]. All tracheal aspirate samples were assessed for purulence, and only bacteria demonstrating significant and moderate growth in the tracheal aspirate culture (using a conventional semi-quantitative method) were considered as causative pathogens of VAP. Candida spp. and Enterococci were not regarded as VAP pathogens. The identification of Klebsiella isolates and antibiotic susceptibility was performed according to the EUCAST guidelines [25]. Klebsiella isolates were defined as MDR according to an international expert proposal for the interim standard definitions for acquired resistance criteria [26]. The detailed case enrolment is presented in Figure 1.
Demographics, clinical and laboratory data collected for each VAP case included: (1) the data of collection of the first MDR Klebsiella spp. positive tracheal aspirate (TA) culture and drug resistance of Klebsiella spp. strains; (2) age, gender, type of admission (medical/surgical), comorbidities, and the use of intravenous (IV) antibiotics within the previous 90 days; (3) concomitant infections, (4) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, reintubation, tracheostomy, and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) during the ICU stay; (5) sepsis status, oxygenation, temperature, inflammatory and acid-base balance on VAP diagnosis; (6) severity of illness on ICU admission and VAP onset; and (7) outcome: alive or dead at day 60, and also ICU discharge. The SOFA score was used to define organ dysfunction (>0) and organ failure (>2). Sepsis status was diagnosed according to Sepsis-2 criteria [27]. The severity of illness was assessed on ICU admission and the diagnosis of VAP using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II scores; data were reported as the worst values within 24 h. Comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Admission was considered as surgical in patients who had undergone surgery in the preceding four weeks. A body mass index of more than 30 was defined as obesity. Non-survivors during the first 24 h of ICU admission were excluded from the mortality analysis. The 60-day and ICU mortality were defined as all-cause mortality within 60 days or during the ICU stay after VAP diagnosis, respectively. Those who remained alive at day 60 or during the ICU stay were considered to be survivors.
To estimate the effect of confounders that may influence mortality, mono- and polybacterial VAP cases we stratified into subgroups according to the severity of illness (SOFA score > 7 vs. SOFA score < 8), the appropriateness (appropriate vs. inappropriate) and timeliness (early vs. late) of the antibiotic therapy, and the MDR profile (MDR vs. XDR). The treatment was considered appropriate when the patient received at least one antibiotic active in vitro against all identified bacteria suspected as pathogens. Early definitive antibacterial treatment was defined as administering at least one appropriate antibiotic within 48 h from the pathogen identification.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages [n (%)] and continuous variables as medians and interquartile range [IQR]. The Mann–Whitney non-parametric test, Pearson’s chi-square test, or two-tailed Fisher’s exact test were performed to detect the differences between groups, as appropriate. Mortality was analyzed as a binary outcome (survivor/non-survivor) and survival time data. In the survival analysis, Kaplan–Meier estimates of the probability of survival were obtained, and survival curves were compared between groups using Log Rank. In all analyses, two-sided p values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The G*Power 3.1 program was used to estimate a power of study. Statistical analysis was carried out while using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS version 20 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

A total of 86 VAP cases due to MDR Klebsiella spp. (K. pneumoniae, n = 82, K. oxytoca, n = 4) were identified: 36 (41.9%) monobacterial and 50 (58.1%) polybacterial. All MDR Klebsiella spp. strains of the cohort were susceptible to carbapenems, but the vast majority of them (>95%) were resistant to piperacillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, and cephalosporins. More detailed data on the antibacterial resistance of Klebsiella spp. strains are shown in Figure 2. Combined resistance to penicillin, third-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones was found in 42 strains (48.8%).
In association with MDR Klebsiella spp., one co-pathogen was found in forty-one (80.0%), and two co-pathogens in nine (20.0%) cases of polybacterial VAP. The most frequently isolated co-pathogens were P. aeruginosa (n = 20, 20% carbapenem resistant) and A. baumannii (n = 12, 91.7% carbapenem resistant). All other Gram-negative co-pathogens (E. coli, n = 7, Citrobacter spp., n = 4, Proteus spp., n = 2, Enterobacter spp., n = 1) were susceptible to carbapenems. Among the Staphylococcus aureus co-pathogens, only one (11.1%) was MRSA.
Klebsiella spp. VAP episodes were, in the vast majority, late-onset, occurring at a median 13.0 days (IQR 6.0–20.0) after hospitalization and 8.0 days (IQR 5.0–13.3) after intubation. The episodes occurred more frequently in males (88.4%), in elderly patients (median 67.0 years, IQR 55.0–75.3), and patients admitted to the ICU with high severity of illness (median SAPS II and SOFA of 47.0 and 6.0, and IQR 35.0–55.0 and 4.8–9.0, respectively). Fifty-six (65.1%) were postoperative adults. Five (5.8%) patients had COPD, thirteen (15.1%) cancer, sixteen (18.6%) diabetes and fifteen (17.4%) obesity (body mass index above 30). Seventeen (19.8%) of MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP cases were in the medical-surgical ICU, 37 (43.0%) in the neurosurgical ICU, six (7.0%) in the coronary care unit, and twenty-six (30.2%) in the cardiosurgical ICU. At diagnosis, twenty (23.3%) of the patients underwent a tracheostomy. In twelve (14%) cases, Klebsiella spp. was isolated both from blood and tracheal aspirate cultures. No empyema or necrotizing pneumonia was diagnosed. Twenty-eight (32.6%) out of eighty-six patients had a previous (within 7 days before the onset of VAP) or concomitant infection. Twenty-one (24.4%) patients required vasopressors at VAP diagnosis, and eighteen (20.9%) underwent renal replacement therapy during their ICU stay. The median PaO2/FiO2 at diagnosis was 162.5 (IQR 126.5–224.2) mmHg. Median CRP and WBC were 155.5 mg/L (IQR 112.3–231.5) and 13.1 × 109/L (IQR 9.9–17.6), respectively. A comparison of clinically significant differences between mono- and polymicrobial episodes is detailed in Table 1.
Patients with monobacterial episodes more frequently had diabetes, obesity, prior antibiotic use (particularly cephalosporins), prior hospitalization within 90 days before VAP onset, a cardiovascular SOFA score ≥ 3, and septic shock at VAP onset. Polybacterial episodes were found to be associated with higher SAPS II scores and altered consciousness (as depicted by neurological SOFA score ≥ 3) at VAP onset (detailed comparison in Table 1). No differences were found between monobacterial and polybacterial episodes in the rates of disease severity (SOFA and SAPS II scores) and organ failure on ICU admission, of CCI > 3, of reintubation, or of RBC transfusion prior to VAP. The possible variables of infection severity were comparable between mono- and polybacterial cases, including the rates of sepsis, organ failure, hypoxia severity, hyper- or hypothermia, acidosis, and elevation of inflammatory markers (CRP, leukocytosis) at the onset of VAP.
Overall, the all-cause 60-day mortality was 40.7% (35/86), while the 60-day all-cause mortality of polymicrobial cases was 50% (25/50). Patients with polybacterial VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. had an estimated excess all-cause 60-day mortality of 23.2% compared to those with monobacterial VAP. ICU mortality was 44.0% vs. 22.8% (p = 0.028), respectively. The time to death (censored at day 60) was found to be shorter in the group of polybacterial VAP, due to MDR Klebsiella spp., p = 0.046 (Figure 3).
The all-cause mortality rate within 60 days for cases of polybacterial VAP tended to be higher, irrespective of previous or concomitant infection. Additionally, in cases of monobacterial VAP with concomitant infection, the mortality rate was 14.3% vs. 52.4% in polybacterial cases (p = 0.078). Mortality remained higher in polybacterial cases, regardless of the timeliness of appropriate definitive treatment (early vs. late), although the difference was not statistically significant. The detailed characteristics of subgroups in all-cause 60-day mortality are provided in Table 2.

4. Discussion

The current study on VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. added value to the understanding of its epidemiological features and the impact of the monobacterial vs. polybacterial origin of VAP on patient mortality. Two-thirds of the episodes were polymicrobial with an all-cause 60-day mortality of 50%. An important new finding of our analysis was that the 60-day mortality rate was 20% higher in polybacterial compared to monobacterial cases. The trend of higher mortality of polybacterial cases persisted even after adjusting for the impact of disease severity, appropriateness and timeliness of treatment, and the resistance profile of Klebsiella spp. strains. Additionally, notable differences were found in the demographic and clinical characteristics of mono- and polybacterial cases of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp.
During recent decades, progress in diagnostic techniques has aided in detecting the rising prevalence of polybacterial pneumonia [28,29]. Notwithstanding this, the studies examining the discrepancies in outcomes among patients with mono- vs. polybacterial VAP caused by the same pathogen are very limited [30,31]. Despite the increasing knowledge about the composition of the normal microbiome of the lower respiratory tract, previously thought to be sterile, it is still difficult to clarify the precise role of each microorganism in polybacterial lung infections: are they true etiological pathogens or merely colonizers/commensals?
Previous research showed high (up to 57.1%) all-cause mortality when VAP was caused by hypervirulent K. pneumoniae; however, it remains unclear whether, and to what degree, the mortality can be associated with the pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella spp. strains, the underlying comorbidities, disease severity (organ dysfunction), or presence of co-pathogens in the case of polybacterial infections [7,32]. The impact of a specific pathogen on the disease course and outcome in the case of polybacterial infections may be difficult to estimate because of the possibility of either positive or negative bacterial interactions. Although the prevalence of Klebsiella spp. as a VAP-causing pathogen is on the rise in several countries, so far we have found no study comparing the impact of a monobacterial and polybacterial origin for VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. on patient mortality. The current study expands the body of knowledge, demonstrating that the polybacterial VAP cases had significantly higher all-cause 60-day mortality (50%) compared to the monobacterial Klebsiella spp. VAP (27.8%). Interestingly, our earlier study (mono- vs. polybacterial VAP due to MDR A. baumannii) found significantly higher mortality for monobacterial cases (57.1% vs. 37.3%) [31]. In the study by Brewer et al. (mono- vs. polybacterial VAP due to P. aeruginosa), a similar trend (78.0% vs. 53.0%, p = 0.15) was observed [30]. On the other hand, Combes et al. did not identify any significant differences in mortality rates of patients with mono- vs. polybacterial VAP [19]. Nevertheless, it should be highlighted that it is difficult to make a comparison between our findings and those of Combes et al., as they did not investigate the mono- vs. polybacterial VAP cases caused by the same pathogen. Furthermore, the Klebsiella species accounted only for 3.1% of all pathogens, and caused monobacterial cases only. Yet, there are studies of pneumonia that, similar to our findings, have revealed higher mortality in polybacterial cases [21,28,33].
After adjusting for the severity of illness, we observed a statistically significantly increased all-cause 60-day mortality for polybacterial VAP cases in the less-severe (SOFA < 8) disease group. In a recent study by Chang et al. on HAP/VAP in ICU patients (Klebsiella spp. was the third most-common pathogen), an association between reduced 28- and 60-day mortality and both the appropriate empirical and definitive treatment was found [34]. Nonetheless, it is noteworthy that, contrary to our study, in the study by Chang, only 67% of pathogens were MDR bacteria, and only 12% of all HAP/VAP cases were of polybacterial origin. Additionally, the associations of the pneumonia‘s origin, appropriateness of treatment, and mortality were not tested. The appropriateness and timeliness of administered antibacterial therapy might have significant implications on patient mortality. Data from the large multicentre study by Kadri et al. (2021) have shown an association between inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy in monobacterial bloodstream infections and increased mortality [35]. We analysed the possible impact of both the appropriateness and timeliness of definitive treatment on the mortality of mono- vs. polybacterial cases of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. The time of appropriate therapy (early vs. late) was not significantly associated with mortality differences in mono- vs. polybacterial VAP cases. In the early-and-appropriate-treatment sub-group, an average 20% excess 60-day mortality (40.0% vs. 21.7%) in polybacterial VAP cases was still documented. This excess mortality could be partly explained by the fact that, when pneumonia is caused by multiple MDR bacteria, it might be challenging or even impossible to achieve a minimal inhibitory concentration of antibiotics effective against all pathogens. Furthermore, not all parenterally administered antibiotics effectively diffuse into the lung tissue, so their impact on the same pathogen in the bloodstream and lung tissue may vary. The analysis of the combined effects of disease severity and appropriateness of treatment revealed a statistically significant increase in the 60-day mortality rate in polybacterial VAP cases in the sub-group with the lower disease severity (p = 0.049). Our finding that the polybacterial MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP had a poorer outcome compared to the monobacterial cases might, at least partially, be explained by the possible synergism between multiple pathogens leading to the activation of virulence mechanisms, the alterations of infected niche, or an imbalanced host–pathogen response [29,36,37]. The cooperative influence of multiple bacteria on the disease course can be more deleterious than the effect of each bacterium independently. The intricate interplay between bacteria encompasses metabolite exchange, interspecies quorum signals, co-aggregation, biofilm formation, and the production of intrinsic antimicrobials [38]. These interactions are key factors in promoting the pathogenesis of most co-pathogens. Moreover, the study by Liao et al. has shown that beta-lactamase-producing bacteria can indirectly contribute to pathogenesis by shielding other bacteria in polybacterial infection cases [39]. The susceptibility of co-pathogens to antibiotics may also have an important impact on the outcomes of patients with polybacterial VAP. As shown by the study of polybacterial bacteremia by Wervay et al., attributable mortality may vary, depending on the causative pathogen [40]. These findings indicate that the influence of polybacterial infections on outcomes should be investigated separately according to the causative pathogens, as was carried out in our recent study on MDR A. baumannii and the current study on MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP. The resistance of Klebsiella spp. strains to antibiotics used to treat infections caused by these bacteria is constantly rising [11,41]. Corresponding to previous studies, we found MDR Klebsiella spp. strains to be fully or nearly fully (>97%) resistant to piperacillin, second- and third-generation cephalosporins, and ampicillin/sulbactam [12,42,43,44]. Additionally, we observed a very high percentage (>50%) of resistance to gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Similarly, as in the study from neighbouring Poland, we found all MDR Klebsiella spp. strains to be sensitive to carbapenems; also, the majority of them were sensitive to amikacin (93.2%) and cefoperazone/sulbactam (71.7%) [43]. Kot et al. revealed that 73.3 % of MDR K. pneumoniae strains were ESBL producers [43]. Although we did not investigate the specific mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in MDR Klebsiella spp. strains, the observed high prevalence (almost 50%) of combined resistance to penicillin, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones suggests a probable production of ESBLs. Our results suggest that, in Lithuania, carbapenems and aminoglycosides might need to be in the preferred first-line empirical antibiotic regimen for VAP when ESBL-producing MDR Klebsiella spp. is suspected. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant strains of this pathogen has significantly reduced the treatment options available, leaving polymixins, aminoglycosides, glycylcyclines, aztreonem, or combination therapies as possibly viable alternatives. Newer betalactamase inhibitors associated with carbapenems, such as imipenen-relebactam in the RESTORE IMI 1 and 2 studies [45,46] improved all-cause mortality in vHAP/VAP and patients with APACHE II scores above 15, adding value to the therapy of critically ill patients with Enterobacteriales and P. aeruginosa. Relebactam has limited class D activity, but our cohort in Lithuania does not require activity against metalobetalactamases.
Bringing fresh knowledge to the field of VAP, we additionally compared the clinical features of mono- and polybacterial cases of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. on ICU admission and at VAP onset. In monomicrobial VAP, compared to the polymicrobial one, on ICU admission, diabetes mellitus, obesity, prior hospitalization, and prior antibacterial treatment, especially with cephalosporins, were more frequent, whereas at VAP onset, the presence of septic shock and a high cardiovascular SOFA score were more frequent (≥3). Polybacterial cases were associated with a higher SAPS II score and impaired state of consciousness at VAP onset, compared to the monomicrobial ones. Most VAP patients had had chronic diseases, and some of them underwent surgery (perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis) that might lead to immunosuppression and increased likelihood of infections. Therefore, they might have received antibiotics within 90 days before the onset of VAP, specifically for this reason. The higher prevalence of chronic underlying diseases in monobacterial VAP and/or the impaired consciousness in polybacterial VAP was also reported in the earlier studies by Ferrer, Cilloniz, and Natarajan [20,28,47]. The associations between a decreased level of consciousness and the polybacterial origin of VAP may be partially explained by the loss of the gag reflex, which may increase the risk of aspiration, with selected resistant organisms among patients exposed to long hospitalization and antibacterial therapies [47,48]. The resistance phenotype of pathogens may also have an impact on patient mortality [49,50]. In our study, the trend of increased mortality in polybacterial Klebsiella spp. VAP cases was observed in both the MDR and XDR groups.

Study Novelties and Limitations

There are some limitations in our study. First, in our analysis, the respiratory cultures were not quantitative, potentially leading to an under- or over-estimation of some pathogens. Second, it was a retrospective, single-centre cohort, and although the data were collected from ICUs of various profiles in the largest Lithuanian university hospital, our results may not represent other hospitals in the country. However, since critically ill patients were transferred from regional hospitals to the university ICUs where the study was conducted, we expect our findings to reflect the country’s VAP profile due to MDR Klebsiella spp. fairly exactly, and thus might be generalizable to Lithuania. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, the sample size was limited to the eligible cases available in the database, limiting the statistical power, with risk of a type II statistical error (statistical power 0.8 with the effect size 0.303). Therefore, due to the relatively small sample size, important numerical differences (20%) in all-cause mortality of monobacterial versus polybacterial episodes were considered as clinically relevant, although they did not reach statistical significance. In addition, a sub-group analysis of MDR Klebsiella spp. strains with different resistance profiles and co-infection with different pathogens could not be conducted. During the study period, our hospital did not routinely investigate molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and did not use rapid tests to detect such resistance mechanisms. In addition, our results cannot be generalized for geographical areas with a high prevalence of carbapenemases, and further studies are required, with important implications for stewardship or preventive strategies. The implications for antimicrobial stewardship or VAP prevention are beyond the scope of this article, and we refer the readers to recent updates [2,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59] addressing these important issues.

5. Conclusions

In a cohort of 86 adults with Klebsiella spp. VAP in Lithuania, the epidemiological features and outcomes differ between monobacterial and polybacterial episodes. The index case was a polymicrobial episode (two-thirds) in an adult above 65 years, hospitalized longer than 13 days, presenting an all-cause high 60-day mortality. Polymicrobial episodes were often associated with neurological dysfunction but with fewer vasopressor requirements. Observed epidemiological differences suggest the need for further research, with mono/polybacterial cases being analyzed separately. These findings may have implications for therapy, particularly in areas with high rates of MDR, for guiding antimicrobial stewardship in ICUs with a high prevalence of Klebsiella spp. VAP.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A., A.C. and J.R.; investigation, D.A. and A.C.; data curation, A.C.; methodology, D.A., A.C. and J.R.; writing, A.C., D.A. and A.A.; writing—review and editing, D.A., D.K. and J.R.; visualization, A.C.; supervision, D.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Kaunas Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (No BEC-MF-156 and No P1-BE-2-13/2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

D.K. declares honoraria from MSD (moderation, speaker). The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Papazian, L.; Klompas, M.; Luyt, C.E. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: Narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2020, 46, 888–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Blot, S.; Ruppé, E.; Harbarth, S.; Asehnoune, K.; Poulakou, G.; Luyt, C.E.; Rello, J.; Klompas, M.; Depuydt, P.; Eckmann, C.; et al. Healthcare-associated infections in adult intensive care unit patients: Changes in epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and contributions of new technologies. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs. 2022, 70, 103227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ding, X.; Ma, X.; Gao, S.; Su, L.; Shan, G.; Hu, Y.; Chen, J.; Ma, D.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, W.; et al. Effect of ICU quality control indicators on VAP incidence rate and mortality: A retrospective study of 1267 hospitals in China. Crit. Care 2022, 26, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sarda, C.; Fazal, F.; Rello, J. Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by resistant gram-negative bacteria: Which is the best strategy to treat? Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2019, 13, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Healthcare-Associated Infections Acquired in Intensive Care Units. In Annual Epidemiological Report for 2017; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2019; Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/AER_for_2017-HAI.pdf (accessed on 4 May 2023).
  6. Koulenti, D.; Tsigou, E.; Rello, J. Nosocomial pneumonia in 27 ICUs in Europe: Perspectives from the EU-VAP/CAP study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 1999–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Guo, S.; Xu, J.; Wei, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Xue, R. Clinical and molecular characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae ventilator-associated pneumonia in mainland China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2015 [Hospitalinių Infekcijų Epidemiologinės Priežiūros Padidintos Rizikos Skyriuose 2015 m. Ataskaita]. Available online: https://www.hi.lt/uploads/pdf/padaliniai/VSTC%20IS/RITS/RITS_2022_m._ataskaita.pdf (accessed on 4 May 2023).
  9. Rello, J.; Kalwaje Eshwara, V.; Conway-Morris, A.; Lagunes, L.; Alves, J.; Alp, E.; Zhang, Z.; Mer, M.; TOTEM Study Investigators. Perceived differences between intensivists and infectious diseases consultants facing antimicrobial resistance: A global cross-sectional survey. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 38, 1235–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rello, J.; Kalwaje Eshwara, V.; Lagunes, L.; Alves, J.; Wunderink, R.G.; Conway-Morris, A.; Rojas, J.N.; Alp, E.; Zhang, Z. A global priority list of the TOp TEn resistant Microorganisms (TOTEM) study at intensive care: A prioritization exercise based on multi-criteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 38, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Europe 2019. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/surveillance-antimicrobial-resistance-Europe-2019.pdf (accessed on 4 May 2023).
  12. Sharma, A.; Thakur, A.; Thakur, N.; Kumar, V.; Chauchan, A.; Bhardwa, N. Changing trend in the antibiotic resistance pattern of Klebsiella pneumonia isolated from endotracheal aspirate samples of ICU patients of a tertiary care hospital in North India. Cureus 2023, 15, e36317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tacconelli, E.; Magrini, N. Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics. Available online: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/global-priority-list-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/en/ (accessed on 4 May 2023).
  14. Mahjobipoor, H.; Sajadi, M.; Honarmand, A.; Rahimi-Varposhti, M.; Yadegari, S.; Fattahpour, S.; Soleimani, M. Prevalence incidence and clinical outcome of Klebsiella and Acinetobacter ventilator-associated pneumonia. Immunopathol. Persa 2023, 9, e34412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gupta, A.; Agrawal, A.; Mehrotra, S.; Singh, A.; Malik, S.; Khanna, A. Incidence, risk stratification, antibiogram of pathogens isolated and clinical outcome of ventilator associated pneumonia. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 15, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lakbar, I.; Medam, S.; Ronflé, R.; Cassir, N.; Delamarre, L.; Hammad, E.; Lopez, A.; Lepape, A.; Machut, A.; Boucekine, M.; et al. Association between mortality and highly antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Serra-Burriel, M.; Keys, M.; Campillo-Artero, C.; Agodi, A.; Barchitta, M.; Gikas, A.; Polos, C.; Lopez-Casasnovas, G. Impact of multi-drug resistant bacteria on economic and clinical outcomes of healthcare-associated infections in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bassetti, M.; Righi, E.; Carnelutti, A.; Graziano, E.; Russo, A. Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Challenges for treatment, prevention and infection control. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2018, 16, 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Combes, A.; Figliolini, C.; Trouillet, J.L.; Kassis, N.; Wolff, M.; Gibert, C.; Chastre, J. Incidence and outcomes of polymicrobial ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 2002, 121, 1618–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ferrer, M.; Difrancesco, L.F.; Liapikou, A.; Rinaudo, M.; Carbonara, M.; Li Bassi, G.; Gabarrus, A.; Torres, A. Polymicrobial intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia: Prevalence, microbiology and outcome. Crit. Care 2015, 19, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Hardak, E.; Avivi, I.; Berkun, L.; Raz-Pasteur, A.; Lavi, N.; Geffen, Y.; Yigla, M.; Oren, I. Polymicrobial pulmonary infection in patients with hematological malignancies: Prevalence, co-pathogens, course and outcome. Infection 2016, 44, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Karakonstantis, S.; Kritsotakis, E.I. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion and associated mortality of polymicrobial (vs monomicrobial) pulmonary and bloodstream infections by Acinetobacter baumannii complex. Infection 2021, 49, 1149–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Russo, A.; Fusco, P.; Morrone, H.L.; Trecarichi, E.M.; Torti, C. New advances in management and treatment of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2023, 21, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 171, 388–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 6.0. 2016. Available online: http://www.eucast.org (accessed on 4 May 2023).
  26. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Ollson-Liljequist; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Dellinger, R.F.; Levy, M.M.; Rhodes, A.; Annane, D.; Gerlach, H.; Opal, S.M.; Sevransky, J.E.; Sprung, C.L.; Douglas, I.S.; Jaeschke, R.; et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 41, 580–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cilloniz, C.; Civljak, R.; Nicolini, A.; Torres, A. Polymicrobial community-acquired pneumonia: An emerging entity. Respirology 2016, 21, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brogden, K.A.; Guthmiller, J.M.; Taylor, C.E. Human polymicrobial infections. Lancet 2005, 365, 253–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brewer, S.C.; Wunderink, R.G.; Jones, C.B.; Leeper, K.V. Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chest 1996, 109, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adukauskiene, D.; Ciginskiene, A.; Adukauskaite, A.; Koulenti, D.; Rello, J. Clinical features and outcomes of monobacterial and polybacterial episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hwang, J.H.; Handigund, M.; Hwang, J.H.; Cho, Y.G.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, J. Clinical features and risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with pneumonia caused by hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKP). Ann. Lab. Med. 2020, 40, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Puech, B.; Canivet, C.; Teysseyre, L.; Miltgen, G.; Aujoulat, T.; Caron, M.; Combe, C.; Jabot, J.; Martinet, O.; Allyn, J.; et al. Effect of antibiotic therapy on the prognosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Ann. Intensive Care 2021, 11, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chang, Y.; Jeon, K.; Lee, S.M.; Cho, Y.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Chong, Y.P.; Hong, S.B. The distribution of multidrug-resistant microorganisms and treatment status of hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia in adult Intensive Care units: A prospective cohort observational study. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2021, 36, e251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kadri, S.S.; Lai, Y.L.; Warner, S.; Strich, J.R.; Babiker, A.; Ricotta, E.E.; Demirkale, C.Y.; Dekker, J.P.; Palmore, T.N.; Rhee, C.; et al. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy for bloodstream infections based on discordant in-vitro susceptibilities: A retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and mortality risk in US hospitals. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chong, K.K.; Kline, K.A. Polymicrobial-host interactions during infection. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3355–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hodak, H. Down to the molecular mechanisms of host-pathogen interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3353–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peters, B.M.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A.; O’May, G.A.; Costerton, J.W.; Shirtliff, M.E. Polymicrobial interactions: Impact on pathogenesis and human disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Liao, Y.T.; Kuo, S.C.; Lee, Y.T.; Chen, C.P.; Lin, S.W.; Shen, L.J.; Fung, C.P.; Cho, W.L.; Chen, T.L. Sheltering effect and indirect pathogenesis of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in polymicrobial infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3983–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Verway, M.; Brown, K.A.; Marchand-Austin, A.; Diong, C.; Lee, S.; Langford, B.; Schwartz, K.L.; MacFadden, D.R.; Patel, S.N.; Sander, B.; et al. Prevalence and mortality associated with bloodstream organisms: A population-wide retrospective cohort study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2022, 60, e0242921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mohd Asri, N.A.; Ahmad, S.; Mohamud, R.; Mohd Hanafi, N.; Mohd Zaidi, N.F.; Irekeola, A.A.; Shueb, R.H.; Yee, L.C.; Mohd Noor, N.; Mustafa, F.H.; et al. Global prevalence of nosocomial multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Maczynska, B.; Paleczny, J.; Oleksy-Wawrzyniak, M.; Choroszy-Krol, I.; Bartoszewicz, M. In vitro susceptibility of multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains causing nosocomial infections to Fosfomycin. A comparison of determination methods. Pathogens 2021, 10, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kot, B.; Piechota, M.; Szweda, P.; Mitrus, J.; Wicha, J.; Gruzewska, A.; Witeska, M. Virulence analysis and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from hospitalised patients in Poland. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 4448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Spadar, A.; Phelan, J.; Elias, R.; Modesto, A.; Caneiras, C.; Marques, C.; Lito, L.; Pinto, M.; Cavaco-Silva, P.; Ferreira, H.; et al. Genomic epidemiological analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae from Portuguese hospitals reveals insights into circulating antimicrobial resistance. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Motsch, J.; Murta de Oliveira, C.; Stus, V.; Köksal, I.; Lyulko, O.; Boucher, H.W.; Kaye, K.S.; File, T.M.; Brown, M.L.; Khan, I.; et al. RESTORE-IMI 1: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing efficacy and safety of Imipenem/Relebactam vs Colistin plus Imipenem in patients with Imipenem-nonsusceptible bacterial infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Titov, I.; Wunderink, R.G.; Roquilly, A.; Rodríguez Gonzalez, D.; David-Wang, A.; Boucher, H.W.; Kaye, K.S.; Losada, M.C.; Du, J.; Tipping, R.; et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing efficacy and safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in adults with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e4539–e4548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Natarajan, R.; Ramanathan, V.; Sistla, S. Poor sensorium at the time of intubation predicts polymicrobial ventilator associated pneumonia. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2022, 18, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Doualeh, M.; Payne, M.; Litton, E.; Raby, E.; Currie, A. Molecular methodologies for improved polymicrobial sepsis diagnosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kadri, S.S.; Adjemian, J.; Lai, Y.L.; Spaulding, A.B.; Ricotta, E.; Prevots, D.R.; Palmore, T.N.; Rhee, C.; Klompas, M.; Dekker; et al. National Institutes of Health Antimicrobial Resistance Outcomes Research Initiative (NIH–ARORI). Difficult-to-Treat Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteremia at 173 US Hospitals: Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcome of Resistance to All First-line Agents. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2018, 67, 1803–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. El-Sokkary, R.; Uysal, S.; Erdem, H.; Kullar, R.; Pekok, A.U.; Amer, F.; Grgić, S.; Carevic, B.; El-Kholy, A.; Liskova, A.; et al. Profiles of multidrug-resistant organisms among patients with bacteremia in intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 40, 2323–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Maertens, B.; Lin, F.; Chen, Y.; Rello, J.; Lathyris, D.; Blot, S. Effectiveness of Continuous Cuff Pressure Control in Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 50, 1430–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Boisson, M.; Bouglé, A.; Sole-Lleonart, C.; Dhanani, J.; Arvaniti, K.; Rello, J.; Rouby, J.J.; Mimoz, O.; European Investigator Network for Nebulized Antibiotics in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (ENAVAP). Nebulized Antibiotics for Healthcare- and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 43, 255–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Campogiani, L.; Tejada, S.; Ferreira-Coimbra, J.; Restrepo, M.I.; Rello, J. Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 39, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Peña-López, Y.; Ramirez-Estrada, S.; Eshwara, V.K.; Rello, J. Limiting ventilator-associated complications in ICU intubated subjects: Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated events and improve outcomes. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2018, 12, 1037–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Azak, E.; Sertcelik, A.; Ersoz, G.; Celebi, G.; Eser, F.; Batirel, A.; Cag, Y.; Ture, Z.; Ozturk Engin, D.; Yetkin, M.A.; et al. THIRG, Turkish Hospital Infection Research Group. Evaluation of the implementation of WHO infection prevention and control core components in Turkish health care facilities: Results from a WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework (IPCAF)-based survey. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2023, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rello, J.; Paiva, J.A. Antimicrobial stewardship at the emergency department: Dead bugs do not mutate! Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2023, 109, 30–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. El-Sokkary, R.; Erdem, H.; Kullar, R.; Pekok, A.U.; Amer, F.; Grgić, S.; Carevic, B.; El-Kholy, A.; Liskova, A.; Özdemir, M.; et al. Self-reported antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures from 57 intensive care units: An international ID-IRI survey. J. Infect. Public Health. 2022, 15, 950–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tabah, A.; Bassetti, M.; Kollef, M.H.; Zahar, J.R.; Paiva, J.A.; Timsit, J.F.; Roberts, J.A.; Schouten, J.; Giamarellou, H.; Rello, J.; et al. Antimicrobial de-escalation in critically ill patients: A position statement from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Critically Ill Patients Study Group (ESGCIP). Intensive Care Med. 2020, 46, 245–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rello, J.; Sarda, C.; Mokart, D.; Arvaniti, K.; Akova, M.; Tabah, A.; Azoulay, E.; Nine-I study Group. Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hematological Patients at the intensive care unit: A global cross-sectional survey from the Nine-i Investigators Network. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 39, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 12 01056 g001 550
Figure 1. Case enrollment flow diagram. ICU—intensive care unit; HAP—hospital-associated pneumonia; HCAP—health-care-associated pneumonia; MV—mechanical ventilation; MDR—multidrug-resistant; VAP—ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Figure 1. Case enrollment flow diagram. ICU—intensive care unit; HAP—hospital-associated pneumonia; HCAP—health-care-associated pneumonia; MV—mechanical ventilation; MDR—multidrug-resistant; VAP—ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Antibiotics 12 01056 g001
Antibiotics 12 01056 g002 550
Figure 2. Antibacterial resistance of Klebsiella spp. strains.
Figure 2. Antibacterial resistance of Klebsiella spp. strains.
Antibiotics 12 01056 g002
Antibiotics 12 01056 g003 550
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for time to death in monobacterial vs. polybacterial VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. (censored at 60 days).
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for time to death in monobacterial vs. polybacterial VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp. (censored at 60 days).
Antibiotics 12 01056 g003
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of mono- and polybacterial cases of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp.
Table 1. Characteristics of mono- and polybacterial cases of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp.
VariableVAP Origin
Monobacterial
n = 36		Polybacterial
n = 50		p Value
Age, years, median (IQR)67.0 (55.0–75.0)71.0 (57.5–76.5)0.813
Sex, male, n (%)32.0 (88.9)44.0 (88.0)0.899
Prior hospitalization within 90 days, n (%)22 (61.1)20 (40.0)0.053
Hospitalisation to ICU from, n (%):
  • ▪ Community—ED
  • ▪ Ward
  • ▪ Other ICU
14 (38.9)
14 (38.9)
8 (22.2)		23 (46.0)
17 (34.0)
10 (20.0)		0.805
Admission, n (%):
  • ▪ Medical
  • ▪ Surgical
11 (30.6)
25 (69.4)		27 (54.0)
23 (46.0)		0.148
Chronic illness, n (%):
  • ▪ Cardiovascular
  • ▪ Respiratory
  • ▪ Neurological
  • ▪ Renal
  • ▪ Diabetes
  • ▪ Obesity *
31 (86.1)
28 (77.8)
4 (11.1)
5 (13.9)
18 (30.6)
11 (30.6)		38 (76.0)
35 (70.0)
3 (6.0)
11 (22.0)
5 (5.8)
4 (4.7)		0.245
0.421
0.392
0.340
0.01
0.007
The use of intravenous antibiotic within 90 days, n (%):28 (77.8)26 (52.0)0.015
  • ▪ Penicillins
  • ▪ Cephalosporins
  • ▪ Fluoroquinolones
  • ▪ Aminoglycosides
  • ▪ Carbapenems
12 (33.3)
24 (66.7)
4 (11.1)
4 (11.1)
3 (3.5)		12 (24.0)
8 (36.0)
4 (8.0)
3 (6.0)
2 (2.3)		0.341
0.005
0.715
0.446
0.645
Disease severity at VAP onset, median (IQR):
  • ▪ SAPS II score
  • ▪ SOFA score
45.0 (35.25–51.0)
7.5 (6–9.75)		50.0 (40.5–60.75)
7.0 (5.0–8.25)		0.033
0.149
Organ failure at VAP onset, n (%):
  • ▪ SOFA respiratory ≥ 3
  • ▪ SOFA cardiovascular ≥ 3
  • ▪ SOFA neurological ≥ 3
28 (77.8)
16 (44.4)
8 (22.2)		36 (72.0)
5 (10.0)
26 (52.0)		0.545
<0.001
0.005
ED: emergency department; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR; interquartile range; IV: intravenous; SAPS II: Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; VAP: ventilator-associated pneumonia; * Obesity: body mass index over 30 kg/m2.
Table
Table 2. All-cause 60-day and ICU mortality of mono- and polybacterial cases of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp.
Table 2. All-cause 60-day and ICU mortality of mono- and polybacterial cases of VAP due to MDR Klebsiella spp.
Variable60-Day Mortality
VAP Originp Value
Monobacterial,
n/Total (%) *		Polybacterial,
n/Total (%) *
All samples10//36 (27.8)25/50 (50.0)0.039
Severity at VAP diagnosis
  • ▪ SOFA < 8
  • ▪ SOFA > 7
3/20 (15.0)
7/416 (43.8)		15/33 (45.5)
10/17 (58.8)		0.023
0.387
Appropriate treatment and severity at VAP diagnosis
  • ▪ SOFA < 8
  • ▪ SOFA > 7
2/16 (12.5)
6/15 (40.0)		10/26 (41.7)
6/13 (46.2)		0.049
0.743
Antibacterial resistance profile of Klebsiella spp. strains
  • ▪ MDR
  • ▪ XDR
7/19 (36.8)
3/17 (17.6)		12/21 (57.1)
13/28 (46.4)		0.199
0.051
ICU: intensive care unit; MDR: multidrug-resistant; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; XDR: extensively drug resistant; VAP: ventilator-associated pneumonia. * n: number of deceased patients in the subgroup/total: total of the respective subgroup.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adukauskiene, D.; Ciginskiene, A.; Adukauskaite, A.; Koulenti, D.; Rello, J. Clinical Features and Outcomes of VAP Due to Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella spp.: A Retrospective Study Comparing Monobacterial and Polybacterial Episodes. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12061056

AMA Style

Adukauskiene D, Ciginskiene A, Adukauskaite A, Koulenti D, Rello J. Clinical Features and Outcomes of VAP Due to Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella spp.: A Retrospective Study Comparing Monobacterial and Polybacterial Episodes. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(6):1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12061056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adukauskiene, Dalia, Ausra Ciginskiene, Agne Adukauskaite, Despoina Koulenti, and Jordi Rello. 2023. "Clinical Features and Outcomes of VAP Due to Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella spp.: A Retrospective Study Comparing Monobacterial and Polybacterial Episodes" Antibiotics 12, no. 6: 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12061056

APA Style

Adukauskiene, D., Ciginskiene, A., Adukauskaite, A., Koulenti, D., & Rello, J. (2023). Clinical Features and Outcomes of VAP Due to Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella spp.: A Retrospective Study Comparing Monobacterial and Polybacterial Episodes. Antibiotics, 12(6), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12061056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop