Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam–Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates: A Multicentre Report from Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Anticandidal and Antibiofilm Effect of Synbiotics including Probiotics and Inulin-Type Fructans
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment in Companion and Food Animals

1
Department of Engineering Management in Biotechnology, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Cvećarska 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Jaume I University, Avinguda de Vicent Sos Baynat, s/n, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
Antibiotics 2022, 11(8), 1137; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081137
Submission received: 6 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 22 August 2022
Several international strategies for antimicrobial stewardship have been developed in response to the global crisis of antimicrobial resistance [1]. The truth of the matter is that despite all of their good intentions, these broad strategies are only slowly being implemented in the real world. Humans and animals are affected by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which means that to combat this problem, both sectors must be considered. An important contributing factor to antimicrobial resistance is the use of antimicrobials [2]. It is undeniable that the use of antibiotics in companion and food animals, as well as antimicrobials, is beneficial in preventing diseases and improving their performance and overall welfare [3,4].
A shortage of experts in key disciplines related to antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary medicine makes it difficult to develop antimicrobial treatment guidelines. Diagnostic tests are also inferior to those in human microbiology and do not provide sufficient information, making it difficult to identify who is using antimicrobial products and when [5]. In both companion and food animals, antimicrobial resistance monitoring has posed several problems, including the use of appropriate methods for gathering data at the level of the animal, as well as the choice of metrics for measuring antimicrobial resistance and the health of animal populations at risk [6].
A Special Issue was devoted to researchers interested in monitoring antimicrobial resistance in animals, and optimizing antimicrobial use in veterinary medicine with a special focus on improving antimicrobial treatment guidelines, diagnostic procedures, and antimicrobial stewardship in companion and food animals.
As a very successful endeavor, this Special Issue has gathered more than 30 papers, of which a total of 17 high-quality reviews and research articles were positively scored, accepted, and published [7].
This Special Issue has welcomed submissions from a very diverse range scientific themes, from the antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus species isolated in raw chicken meat from retail stores [8] to comparative evaluations of qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS genes in Enterobacteriaceae ciprofloxacin-resistant cases in swines [9]. Roque-Borda et al. [10] have investigated a Ctx(Ile21)-Ha antimicrobial peptide, evaluating the effects of its application in laying chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis, resistant to nalidixic acid and spectinomycin, and achieving very promising results. Previously, natural alternatives to antibiotics usage in the form of essential oils was investigated in vitro [11], as well as in vivo, in cattle [12].
Xu et al. [13] conducted a study that aimed to examine the pharmacokinetics of doxycycline in yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) and to calculate related pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters of doxycycline against Edwardsiella ictaluri. The obtained results of this fascinating study suggest that administration of doxycycline at 20 mg/kg every 96 h is a preferable regimen in yellow catfish. Furthermore, Little et al. [14] revealed that pigs reared on many farms are mass-medicated for short periods with antibiotics through their drinking water to control bacterial pathogen loads and, if a disease outbreak occurs, to treat pigs until clinical signs are eliminated. Based on that fact, a survey was conducted including managers of 25 medium-to-large single-site and multi-site pig farming enterprises across eastern and southern Australia using a mixed methods approach. Little et al. [14] found wide variation in the antibiotics administered, the choice and use of dosing equipment, the methods for performing dosing calculations and preparing antibiotic stock solutions, the commencement time and duration of each daily dosing event, and the frequency of administration of metaphylaxis. This interesting and practical research has revealed that farm managers need to be provided with measurement systems, technical guidelines, and training programs to improve their stewardship.
Several articles have revealed interesting and promising results of antibiotics usage and the prevalence of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in horses, donkeys [15], pigs, chickens, fish [16], dogs [17], and cats [18]. When it comes to diseases in ruminants, a pilot study conducted in Sweden has presented the effects of benzylpenicillin, oxytetracycline, and florfenicol in the treatment of acute undifferentiated respiratory disease [19]. Furthermore, results of Petrocchi-Rilo et al.’s [20] investigation have confirmed that antimicrobial resistance genes in porcine Pasteurella multocida are not associated with its antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.
Another very interesting research with the application of antibiotics through drinking water of lambs has been presented by Ferran et al. [21]. Based on the obtained results, delivery by drinking water resulted in a very high interindividual variability of sulfadimethoxine plasma concentrations, meaning that although disease spread could be controlled at the group level, some individuals would inevitably be under- or over-exposed to the antibiotic.
Vilaró et al. [22] investigated the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of swine respiratory pathogens in Spain from 2017 to 2019, while Mileva et al. [23] presented their results of oxytetracycline pharmacokinetics after intramuscular administration in cows with clinical metritis associated with Trueperella pyogenes infection in Bulgaria.
Puvača and de Llanos Frutos [24] presented evidence that antimicrobial resistance has become a big problem in recent years on a global scale. Public healthcare systems all over the world are faced with a great challenge in this respect. Many bacteria can cause infections in humans and animals alike, but somehow, it seems that the greatest threat nowadays comes from the Enterobacteriaceae members, especially Escherichia coli. Puvača and de Llanos Frutos [24] have stated that it is evident that the epidemiology of E. coli strains and resistance mechanisms that they have developed over time are extremely significant topics, and all scientific findings in this area will be of vital importance in the fight against infections caused by these bacteria.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all authors for their excellent papers on this Special Issue, “Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment in Companion and Food Animals”. I also thank the reviewers for their valuable recommendations leading to the improvement in all manuscripts before publication. I am also grateful to all members of the Antibiotics Editorial Office for providing me with this opportunity and for their continuous support in managing and organizing this Special Issue. I would also like to thank all colleagues, researchers, scientists, and professors who were a part of COST Action CA18217—European Network for Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment, who were big supporters of this successful Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Majumder, M.A.A.; Rahman, S.; Cohall, D.; Bharatha, A.; Singh, K.; Haque, M.; Gittens-St Hilaire, M. Antimicrobial Stewardship: Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance and Protecting Global Public Health. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 4713–4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, X.-Y.; Logue, M.; Robinson, N. Antimicrobial Resistance Is a Global Problem–A UK Perspective. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2020, 36, 101136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kostadinović, L.; Lević, J. Effects of Phytoadditives in Poultry and Pigs Diseases. J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag. 2018, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Puvača, N. Bioactive Compounds in Dietary Spices and Medicinal Plants. J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag. 2022, 5, 704–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lloyd, D.H.; Page, S.W. Antimicrobial Stewardship in Veterinary Medicine. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gilbert, W.; Thomas, L.F.; Coyne, L.; Rushton, J. Review: Mitigating the Risks Posed by Intensification in Livestock Production: The Examples of Antimicrobial Resistance and Zoonoses. Animal 2021, 15, 100123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Puvača, N.; Britt, C.; Gomez-Raja, J. Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment in Companion and Food Animals; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2021; ISBN 978-3-0365-2130-5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lika, E.; Puvača, N.; Jeremić, D.; Stanojević, S.; Shtylla Kika, T.; Cocoli, S.; de Llanos Frutos, R. Antibiotic Susceptibility of Staphylococcus Species Isolated in Raw Chicken Meat from Retail Stores. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Doma, A.O.; Popescu, R.; Mitulețu, M.; Muntean, D.; Dégi, J.; Boldea, M.V.; Radulov, I.; Dumitrescu, E.; Muselin, F.; Puvača, N.; et al. Comparative Evaluation of QnrA, QnrB, and QnrS Genes in Enterobacteriaceae Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Cases, in Swine Units and a Hospital from Western Romania. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Roque-Borda, C.A.; Pereira, L.P.; Guastalli, E.A.L.; Soares, N.M.; Mac-Lean, P.A.B.; Salgado, D.D.; Meneguin, A.B.; Chorilli, M.; Vicente, E.F. HPMCP-Coated Microcapsules Containing the Ctx (Ile21)-Ha Antimicrobial Peptide Reduce the Mortality Rate Caused by Resistant Salmonella Enteritidis in Laying Hens. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Puvača, N.; Milenković, J.; Galonja Coghill, T.; Bursić, V.; Petrović, A.; Tanasković, S.; Pelić, M.; Ljubojević Pelić, D.; Miljković, T. Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Essential Oils against Selected Pathogenic Bacteria: In Vitro Study. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kovačević, Z.; Radinović, M.; Čabarkapa, I.; Kladar, N.; Božin, B. Natural Agents against Bovine Mastitis Pathogens. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, N.; Li, M.; Ai, X.; Lin, Z. Determination of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Parameters of Doxycycline against Edwardsiella ictaluri in Yellow Catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco). Antibiotics 2021, 10, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Little, S.; Woodward, A.; Browning, G.; Billman-Jacobe, H. In-Water Antibiotic Dosing Practices on Pig Farms. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shnaiderman-Torban, A.; Marchaim, D.; Navon-Venezia, S.; Lubrani, O.; Paitan, Y.; Arielly, H.; Steinman, A. Third Generation Cephalosporin Resistant Enterobacterales Infections in Hospitalized Horses and Donkeys: A Case–Case–Control Analysis. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Maan, M.K.; Weng, Z.; Dai, M.; Liu, Z.; Hao, H.; Cheng, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, L. The Spectrum of Antimicrobial Activity of Cyadox against Pathogens Collected from Pigs, Chicken, and Fish in China. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Salgado-Caxito, M.; Moreno-Switt, A.I.; Paes, A.C.; Shiva, C.; Munita, J.M.; Rivas, L.; Benavides, J.A. Higher Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Enterobacterales in Dogs Attended for Enteric Viruses in Brazil Before and After Treatment with Cephalosporins. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shnaiderman-Torban, A.; Navon-Venezia, S.; Kelmer, E.; Cohen, A.; Paitan, Y.; Arielly, H.; Steinman, A. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Shedding by Dogs and Cats Hospitalized in an Emergency and Critical Care Department of a Veterinary Teaching Hospital. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Welling, V.; Lundeheim, N.; Bengtsson, B. A Pilot Study in Sweden on Efficacy of Benzylpenicillin, Oxytetracycline, and Florfenicol in Treatment of Acute Undifferentiated Respiratory Disease in Calves. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Petrocchi-Rilo, M.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C.-B.; Pérez-Fernández, E.; Vilaró, A.; Fraile, L.; Martínez-Martínez, S. Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Porcine Pasteurella Multocida Are Not Associated with Its Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferran, A.A.; Lacroix, M.Z.; Bousquet-Mélou, A.; Duhil, I.; Roques, B.B. Levers to Improve Antibiotic Treatment of Lambs via Drinking Water in Sheep Fattening Houses: The Example of the Sulfadimethoxine/Trimethoprim Combination. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vilaró, A.; Novell, E.; Enrique-Tarancón, V.; Balielles, J.; Vilalta, C.; Martinez, S.; Fraile Sauce, L.J. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Porcine Respiratory Bacteria in Spain. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mileva, R.; Karadaev, M.; Fasulkov, I.; Petkova, T.; Rusenova, N.; Vasilev, N.; Milanova, A. Oxytetracycline Pharmacokinetics After Intramuscular Administration in Cows with Clinical Metritis Associated with Trueperella Pyogenes Infection. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Puvača, N.; de Llanos Frutos, R. Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia Coli Strains Isolated from Humans and Pet Animals. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Puvača, N. Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment in Companion and Food Animals. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081137

AMA Style

Puvača N. Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment in Companion and Food Animals. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(8):1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Puvača, Nikola. 2022. "Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment in Companion and Food Animals" Antibiotics 11, no. 8: 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081137

APA Style

Puvača, N. (2022). Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment in Companion and Food Animals. Antibiotics, 11(8), 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081137

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop