Next Article in Journal
Persistent Bacterial Infections, Antibiotic Treatment Failure, and Microbial Adaptive Evolution
Previous Article in Journal
Concentrations of Ciprofloxacin in the World’s Rivers Are Associated with the Prevalence of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli: A Global Ecological Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/antibiotics11030418
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

IPA-3: An Inhibitor of Diadenylate Cyclase of Streptococcus suis with Potent Antimicrobial Activity

by
Haotian Li
1,†,
Tingting Li
1,†,
Wenjin Zou
1,
Minghui Ni
1,
Qiao Hu
1,
Xiuxiu Qiu
1,
Zhiming Yao
1,
Jingyan Fan
1,
Lu Li
1,2,3,
Qi Huang
1,2,3,* and
Rui Zhou
1,2,3,4,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Cooperative Innovation Center of Sustainable Pig Production, Wuhan 430070, China
3
International Research Center for Animal Disease (Ministry of Science & Technology of China), Wuhan 430070, China
4
The HZAU-HVSEN Institute, Wuhan 430042, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(3), 418; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030418
Submission received: 17 February 2022 / Revised: 13 March 2022 / Accepted: 16 March 2022 / Published: 21 March 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a huge threat to public health. The development of novel antibiotics is an effective strategy to tackle AMR. Cyclic diadenylate monophosphate (c-di-AMP) has recently been identified as an essential signal molecule for some important bacterial pathogens involved in various bacterial physiological processes, leading to its synthase diadenylate cyclase becoming an attractive antimicrobial drug target. In this study, based on the enzymatic activity of diadenylate cyclase of Streptococcus suis (ssDacA), we established a high-throughput method of screening for ssDacA inhibitors. Primary screening with a compound library containing 1133 compounds identified IPA-3 (2,2′-dihydroxy-1,1′-dinapthyldisulfide) as an ssDacA inhibitor. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis further indicated that IPA-3 could inhibit the production of c-di-AMP by ssDacA in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. Notably, it was demonstrated that IPA-3 could significantly inhibit the growth of several Gram-positive bacteria which harbor an essential diadenylate cyclase but not E. coli, which is devoid of the enzyme, or Streptococcus mutans, in which the diadenylate cyclase is not essential. Additionally, the binding site in ssDacA for IPA-3 was predicted by molecular docking, and contains residues that are relatively conserved in diadenylate cyclase of Gram-positive bacteria. Collectively, our results illustrate the feasibility of ssDacA as an antimicrobial target and consider IPA-3 as a promising starting point for the development of a novel antibacterial.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a serious global issue threatening human and animal health [1,2,3,4]. At least 700,000 deaths are caused by antibiotic resistance worldwide every year [5], and it has been estimated that 10 million people may die from AMR annually by 2050 if no effective actions are taken [6]. One of the major reasons leading to AMR accumulation is the slowdown of novel antimicrobial drug development. In the past few decades, very few novel classes of antibiotics have been developed [7]. Therefore, the development of novel antimicrobial drugs is urgently needed.
Drug target identification is critical for novel antimicrobial drug development [8]. Traditional antibiotics generally work by interfering with the biosynthesis of the bacterial cell wall, DNA replication, protein synthesis, or the integrity of the cell membrane [9,10]. Recently, novel pathways have been proposed as promising targets for antimicrobial drug development. Bacterial proteases such as FstH and signal peptidases I and II are regarded as antimicrobial drug targets due to their critical roles in bacterial physiology [11]. Bacterial kinases, including histidine kinases and serine/threonine kinases, are considered attractive targets for novel antibacterial development, and inhibitors of these kinases have been screened which display antimicrobial activity [12]. In addition, other potential antimicrobial drug targets have been proposed, such as the β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) complex [13] and the bacterial SOS pathway [14]. Recently, cyclic dinucleotide (c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, and cGAMP) signaling was revealed to have critical regulatory roles in bacterial physiology, and these molecules have been deemed as promising antimicrobial and anti-virulence drug targets [15,16].
c-di-AMP is an emerging second-messenger molecule predominant in Gram-positive Firmicutes, Actinomycetes, and Mycobacteria [17,18,19]. It is involved in various physiological processes, including but not limited to maintaining cellular potassium hemostasis and osmotic pressure, regulating the synthesis of the cell wall, monitoring DNA damage, and controlling biofilm formation [20,21,22]. Cellular c-di-AMP levels are precisely regulated by diadenylate cyclase and phosphodiesterase [23]. The deletion mutant of diadenylate cyclase in many species (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae) can not be constructed under common culture conditions, indicating that c-di-AMP is an essential molecule [24,25]. Therefore, targeting diadenylate cyclase could be a promising strategy to develop novel antimicrobials.
Streptococcus suis is an important zoonotic pathogen causing serious public health issues and economic losses [26,27]. It causes a wide range of diseases in pigs, including meningitis, arthritis, and sepsis [4]. S. suis can also cause life-threatening diseases such as streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome (STSLS) and meningitis in humans [28,29]. Vaccines are deemed as a valid strategy to prevent infectious diseases. Unfortunately, the multiple serotypes and sequence types of S. suis commonly result in vaccination failure [30,31]. Currently, antibiotics are extensively utilized to treat diseases caused by S. suis. However, the misuse of antibiotics causes the accumulation of antimicrobial resistance in S. suis [32,33,34,35]. Thus, developing novel antibiotics is of great importance in controlling S. suis infection.
In this study, we established a high-throughput approach to screen the inhibitors of the second messenger c-di-AMP synthase of S. suis (ssDacA). Subsequently, a drug library including 1133 compounds was subjected to testing for their ssDacA inhibition. One compound, IPA-3 (2,2′-dihydroxy-1,1′-dinapthyldisulfide), was identified as an effective ssDacA inhibitor, demonstrating potent inhibition against S. suis and other Gram-positive bacteria.

2. Results

2.1. Purification of ssDacA

Diadenylate cyclase of S. suis is a triple membrane-spanning protein, which has a C-terminal catalytic domain (residues 99 to 283) (Figure 1A). The catalytic domain (ssDacA) was expressed in E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography. The purified ssDacA was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, which demonstrated that the protein was successfully obtained (Figure 1B).

2.2. Determination of the Optimal Enzymatic Reaction Conditions for ssDacA

We next sought to establish a high-throughput assay to screen ssDacA inhibitors. The parameters for the enzymatic reaction were optimized. As ssDacA catalyzes the condensation of 2 ATP molecules into cyclic di-AMP (Figure 2A), its activity can be indicated by the consumption of ATP. We used Kinase Glo® reagent to measure the presence of ATP in the ssDacA catalytic reaction. Firstly, the optimal ATP concentration was determined. As shown in Figure 2B, ATP at 100 µM in the enzymatic reaction exhibited the largest signal–noise ratio, which was used as the optimal ATP concentration. Next, the optimal ssDacA concentration was determined in which 100 µM of ssDacA was the lowest concentration that consumed the most ATP (Figure 2C). Finally, the optimal incubation time was determined, indicating that 2 h was the shortest time to obtain the largest signal–noise ratio in the presence of 100 µM ATP and 100 µM ssDacA (Figure 2D). Together, 100 µM ATP, 100 µM ssDacA, and 2 h incubation at 37 °C were used as the optimal condition for ssDacA activity assay. By using this condition, we calculated the Z-factor (a parameter for quality control for high-throughput screening [36,37]) as 0.67 (Figure 2E), indicating that the established assay was suitable for high-throughput screening.

2.3. Screening for ssDacA Inhibitors

By using the assay established above, a drug library containing 1133 compounds was applied to screen for ssDacA inhibitors (Figure 3A and Supplementary Table S3). The results revealed that IPA-3 (2,2′-dihydroxy-1,1′-dinapthyldisulfide) exerted an inhibition of 82.33% against ssDacA at 100 μM. The structure of IPA-3 is shown in Figure 3B. The enzymatic assay indicated that the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of IPA-3 was 38.22 μM against ssDacA (Figure 3C). To further confirm the inhibitory activity of IPA-3 against ssDacA, the catalytic product c-di-AMP in the reaction was detected in the presence and absence of IPA-3 in vitro by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). IPA-3 demonstrated the ability to inhibit the production of c-di-AMP by ssDacA in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3D).

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity of IPA-3

As diadenylate cyclase is an essential protein in several bacteria and believed to be an antimicrobial drug target, we subsequently tested the antimicrobial activity of IPA-3. Three bacteria strains including S. suis SC19 [38], B. subtilis WB800N [39], and S. aureus ATCC29213 were subjected to growth tests in the presence of different concentrations of IPA-3 ranging from 0 to 25 μM. The bacterial growth assay demonstrated that IPA-3 at 25 μM almost completely abolished the growth of these strains. Additionally, IPA-3 at 5 μM or 10 μM demonstrated growth inhibition (Figure 4A–C). Notably, IPA-3 was also demonstrated to inhibit the growth of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial strains including E. rhusiopathiae 13013 [40], S. suis SS2041 [41], and S. aureus 1213M4A (Figure 4D–F). However, IPA-3 at different concentrations demonstrated no or non-lethal inhibition against S. mutans ATCC25175 (Figure 4G) and E. coli ATCC25922 (Figure 4H).

2.5. Potential Binding Mode

A simulated structure of ssDacA was generated by using the I-TASSER server (Figure 5A). IPA-3 was docked into the simulated 3D structure of ssDacA. The lowest binding energy (−8.84 kcal/mol) conformation revealed that IPA-3 interacts with ssDacA via hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic forces. In order to evaluate the binding mode of the complex (ssDacA–IPA-3), a molecular dynamics simulation was performed using GROMACS software. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) was introduced to monitor the fluctuations of the simulation process. It was shown in Figure 5B that the complex ssDacA–IPA-3 finally reached a stable and equilibrious state. Based on the optimized conformation with minimal energy, the residues in ssDacA that interact with IPA-3 include L141, D181, A196, L198, T212, and R213. The multiple amino acid alignments based on different bacterial diadenylate cyclase amino acid sequences revealed that most of these residues are relatively conserved (Figure 5C,D).

3. Discussion

The development of novel antibiotics is an effective strategy to tackle antimicrobial resistance. Recently, c-di-AMP has been revealed as an essential signal molecule in several important bacterial pathogens, making c-di-AMP synthase an attractive antimicrobial target. In this study, we developed a novel high-throughput assay to screen for ssDacA inhibitors, and IPA-3 was identified as a potent inhibitor showing inhibition against ssDacA enzymes as well as S. suis and several other bacteria. Our results provide a good starting point for further antimicrobial drug development.
c-di-AMP was originally discovered as an important signal molecule involved in DNA repair [42]. It was later demonstrated that c-di-AMP plays major roles in the regulation of physiological homeostasis connected with bacteria fitness [43,44], including maintaining cell wall homeostasis, regulating cellar metabolism, monitoring DNA integrity, influencing sporulation, and biofilm formation [20,45,46,47]. For instance, the genetic competence of S. pneumoniae is modulated by c-di-AMP, which further influences its antibiotic tolerance and environmental response [48]. c-di-AMP signaling can also affect normal physiological functions and impair the virulence of E. faecalis [49]. Furthermore, in L. monocytogenes, diminished c-di-AMP levels lead to declined growth of bacteria in macrophages, indicating that c-di-AMP is critical for establishing infection [46]. More importantly, c-di-AMP was reported as an essential second-messenger molecule. It has been reported that diadenylate cyclase cannot be deleted in S. suis, S. aureus, or S. pneumoniae under normal culture conditions [24,50]. Collectively, the synthesis of c-di-AMP in bacteria could be a promising antimicrobial target.
The usual method of screening for diadenylate cyclase inhibitors is based on coralyne associated fluorescence assay. On binding with c-di-AMP, the fluorescence of coralyne can be significantly enhanced and this can be performed to monitor c-di-AMP biosynthesis [51,52,53,54]. In this study, we established a novel method of detecting the activity of ssDacA by measuring the consumption of ATP, which shortened the screening cycle. To maximize the difference of signal to background, the important reaction parameters were optimized for the enzymatic reaction system. We consider the concentration of 100 μM ssDacA and 100 μM ATP incubated at 37 °C for 2 h to be the optimal enzymatic reaction parameters. Z-factor is a statistical parameter for estimating the signal dynamic range and the data variation of the high-throughput screening assay [55]. The Z-factor value of 0.67 demonstrated that this method of enzyme activity measurement could be used in a high-throughput screening assay.
So far, several inhibitors of diadenylate cyclase have been identified. A series of the B. subtilis DisA inhibitors such as bromophenol thiohydantoin, tannic acid, theaflavin-3′-gallate, theaflavin-3, 3′-digallate, and suramin were found by employing coralyne fluorescence assay [52,53]. Cordycepin triphosphate was also revealed as an inhibitor of Thermotoga maritima DisA [54]. However, antimicrobial evaluations of the inhibitors in vitro and in vivo were not carried out.
IPA-3 is an allosteric inhibitor of p21-activated kinase-1 (PAK-1) that plays an essential role in eukaryotic cell migration, proliferation, and gene transcription, and acts as an anti-tumor target [56]. IPA-3 was also found to have bioactivity against many cancer cells, such as metastatic prostate cancer cells and a variety of human leukemic cell lines [57]. Here, we report for the first time that IPA-3 is an inhibitor of diadenylate cyclase. In addition, IPA-3 at 25 μM can almost completely inhibit the growth of Gram-positive bacteria, including AMR strains harboring an essential diadenylate cyclase, but not E. coli which is devoid of diadenylate cyclase. However, it was revealed that the level of inhibition of IPA-3 against S. mutans ATCC25175 was much lower than against other Gram-positive bacteria tested. This was consistent with a previous report in which it was demonstrated that diadenylate cyclase was not completely vital for the growth of S. mutans [58].
As the 3D structure of DacA of S. suis remains to be resolved, a simulated structure was generated using the I-TASSER server. Subsequently, IPA-3 was docked into the simulated structure. The lowest-energy conformation was considered the binding mode between IPA-3 and the simulated structure of ssDacA. To further optimize the binding mode of the lowest-energy conformation of ssDacA–IPA-3, a molecular dynamics simulation was performed. In the optimized complex model, IPA-3 interacts with ssDacA via hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic forces. It was also reported that the key motifs for the enzymatic activity of ssDacA were DGA and RHR, which are relatively conserved in diadenylate cyclase among Gram-positive bacteria [59]. Moreover, the residues in ssDacA that bind to IPA-3 include the residues in DGA and RHR motifs, which can explain why IPA-3 presents a wide-spectrum inhibition against S. suis, S. aureus, B. subtilis, and E. rhusiopathiae.
Although IPA-3 is regarded as a drug-like compound, a previous study revealed that IPA-3 is toxic for human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [60]. In addition, we found that IPA-3 was poorly soluble in water, which is an obstacle to its direct use as an antibiotic. Therefore, further optimizations based on IPA-3 will be needed. For example, structural biological studies should be performed to give a more accurate binding model between IPA-3 and ssDacA. We recommend testing the bioactivity of IPA-3-derived compounds to provide more information for structure–activity relationship analysis. If more promising compounds are discovered, druggability studies such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) analysis could be carried out.
In conclusion, we developed a high-throughput assay to screen for ssDacA inhibitors which identified IPA-3 as a potent inhibitor with bioactivity inhibiting the growth of S. suis, S. aureus, B. subtilis, and E. rhusiopathiae. Our results indicate that IPA-3 could be a promising candidate for further antimicrobial development.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains and Drug Library

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1. S. suis, S. aureus, and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae were cultured with tryptic soy agar (TSA) or tryptic soy broth (TSB) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis were grown in lysogeny broth (LB) medium. Streptococcus mutans was cultured with brain heart infusion (BHI) medium. The kinase inhibitor library (HY-LD-000001801), containing 1133 compounds, was purchased from MedChemExpress (MCE), and the detailed information is listed in Supplementary Table S3. The library was supplied in 96-well plates of 10 mM stocks in DMSO and stored at −80 °C.

4.2. Protein Expression and Purification

The coding sequence of the catalytic domain of diadenylate cyclase ssDacA (99 AA to 283 AA) of S. suis was amplified from the S. suis SC19 genome using the primer pair ssDacAcyto-F/R and is listed in Supplementary Table S2. The PCR product was then cloned into the pET28a vector to generate the recombinant expression plasmid pET28a-dacAcyto, which was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells. The expression of the protein was induced by the addition of 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 28 °C for 10 h. The His-tagged ssDacA was purified by affinity chromatography with the Ni-NTA column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden, Cat#: 10271899).

4.3. High-Throughput Screening for ssDacA Inhibitors

The screening of ssDacA inhibitors was performed as follows. A reaction mixture (10 μL) containing ssDacA (at optimal concentration) and ATP (at optimal concentration) in the reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl) was supplemented with 0.5 μL of each library compound or DMSO in 384-well black plates. The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Then, 10 μL of Kinase Glo® reagent was added to each well. After 10 min, the relative light unit (RLU) values were measured by using a microplate spectrophotometer. Percent inhibition was calculated as ((RLUX − RLUP)/(RLUN − RLUP)) × 100%, where RLUX is the RLU value for a test treated with compound X, and RLUP and RLUN are the RLU values for the reaction mixture without the treatment of compound and the reaction mixture lacking ssDacA, respectively.
The parameters for the ssDacA enzymatic reaction were optimized as follows. The optimal ATP concentration was determined in the presence of 50 µM ssDacA with ATP concentrations of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 µM. Similarly, the optimal concentration of ssDacA was determined in the presence of the optimal concentration of ATP. The optimal reaction time was then determined when optimal concentrations of ssDacA and ATP were present.
The Z-factor is a statistical parameter for estimating the signal dynamic range and the data variation of the high-throughput screening assay. The Z-factor was calculated as 1 − [(3 × SDN + 3 × SDP)/(AVGN − AVGP)] where SDN and SDP are the standard deviation of the relative light unit (RLU) values of the 100 negative wells lacking ssDacA and the 100 positive wells containing ssDacA under the condition of optimal reaction parameters, respectively; in addition, AVGN and AVGP are the average RLU values of the negative wells and the positive wells, respectively.

4.4. Determination of Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) of IPA-3 against ssDacA

The reaction was performed in a 50 μL mixture containing 100 μM ssDacA in the reaction buffer supplemented with 1 μL of DMSO or compound IPA-3 with final concentrations ranging from 10 μM to 200 μM in a 96-well black plate. The percent inhibition was calculated as described above. The data were transformed to log scale and non-linear regression was performed with GraphPad Prism software (version 7) using the variable-slope 4-parameter model for enzyme inhibition to determine IC50.

4.5. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine the concentration of c-di-AMP as previously described with minor modifications [19]. Briefly, 500 μL of reaction mixture containing 50 μM ssDacA and 100 μM ATP in the reaction buffer supplemented with different concentrations of IPA-3 or DMSO was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The reaction was then terminated by incubation at 100 °C for 10 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min to remove the denatured protein, and the supernatant was filtered and degassed. Following this, 20 μL of the supernatant was analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC on an RPC-18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, GL Sciences, Tokyo, Japan) using the Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC system with 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 5.5 (Buffer A), and 100% methanol (Buffer B) as solvent. The column temperature was set to 25 °C and the flow rate was 0.7 mL/min. Samples were eluted using a linear gradient from 0 to 50% solvent B over 30 min. c-di-AMP was detected by measuring absorbance at 254 nm. c-di-AMP standard (BioLog, Bremen, Germany, Cat NO. C 088–01) was run in parallel.

4.6. Bacterial Growth Inhibition Assay

Cells of S. suis SC19, S. suis SS2041, S. aureus ATCC29213, S. aureus 1213M4A, S. mutants ATCC25175, E. rhusiopathiae 13013, B. subtilis WB800N, and E. coli ATCC25922 were grown to the mid-log phase in TSB-FBS, LB, or BHI, respectively, according to Section 4.1. The cells were then subcultured 1:100 into the corresponding medium supplemented with different concentrations of IPA-3 (MedChemExpress) in a 100-well plate. The plate was incubated at 37 °C with shaking and the growth was monitored using an automatic growth curve analyzer (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Helsingfors, Finland).

4.7. In Silico Docking

The 3D structure of the diadenylate cyclase domain of ssDacA was predicted using the I-TASSER server (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/, accessed on 9 July 2020) [61,62,63]. The homologous model of the diadenylate cyclase domain of ssDacA with IPA-3 was generated using Autodock4 software. The residues of the diadenylate cyclase domain interacting with IPA-3 were displayed using PyMOL (version 2.0.6.0). The amino acid sequences of diadenylate cyclase were aligned using MEGA version 6 and were presented by the ESPript 3.0 server [64].

4.8. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

All-atom molecular dynamics simulation was performed to optimize the ssDacA–IPA-3 complex model using GROMACS software (2021 version). An Amber99SB-ILDN force field was used to describe both ssDacA and IPA-3. The topology file of IPA-3 was generated using Antechamber and ACPYPE tools. In the simulation system, the complex was set in a dodecahedral solvation box with the boundary kept at a minimum distance of 1.5 nm from the complex surface, and then the TIP3P water model was selected and 7 Na+ were added to the complex to counteract the charge of the system, based on the VERLET method. The simulation system was optimized for energy minimization under the Amber99SB force field, and then NVT and NPT runs were carried out for pre-equilibration. Subsequently, a total of 50 ns simulation under Amber99SB force field with a 2 fs step size was run in an NPT ensemble for this system, in which the temperature was set to 300 K and the pressure was set to 1.01325 bar. During the molecular dynamics simulation, the energy of the system, the RMSD of protein structure, and small-molecule structure fluctuation were monitored.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed by a two-tailed Student’s t-test in GraphPad Prism 7 software, with a p-value < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11030418/s1, Table S1: Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study; Table S2: Primers used in this study; Table S3: The detailed information of 1133 compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L., T.L. and Q.H. (Qi Huang); formal analysis, H.L., Q.H. (Qiao Hu), X.Q. and L.L.; funding acquisition, R.Z.; investigation, H.L., T.L., W.Z. and M.N.; methodology, H.L., Z.Y., J.F. and Q.H. (Qi Huang); project administration, R.Z.; supervision, Q.H. (Qi Huang) and R.Z.; validation, Q.H. (Qi Huang); writing—original draft, H.L. and T.L.; writing—review and editing, Q.H. (Qi Huang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Plans of China (No. 2021YFD1800401 & 2018YFE0101600).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study does not involve human or animal subjects.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the main manuscript and the Supplementary Materials of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ADMEAbsorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
AMRAntimicrobial resistance
AMPAdenosine monophosphate
BHIBrain heart infusion
c-di-AMPCyclic diadenylate monophosphate
c-di-GMPCyclic diguanylate monophosphate
cGAMPCyclic GMP-AMP
DacADiadenylate cyclase
GMPGuanosine monophosphate
HPLCHigh-performance liquid chromatography
IC50Half-maximal inhibitory concentration
IPA-32,2′-Dihydroxy-1,1′-dinapthyldisulfide
IPTGIsopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside
LBLysogeny broth
RLURelative light unit
RMSDRoot-mean-square deviation
SARStructure–activity relationship
TSATryptic soy agar
TSBTryptic soy broth

References

  1. Brinkac, L.; Voorhies, A.; Gomez, A.; Nelson, K.E. The threat of antimicrobial resistance on the human microbiome. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 74, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Croft, A.C.; D’Antoni, A.V.; Terzulli, S.L. Update on the antibacterial resistance crisis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2007, 13, Ra103–Ra118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Ferri, M.; Ranucci, E.; Romagnoli, P.; Giaccone, V. Antimicrobial resistance: A global emerging threat to public health systems. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2857–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Haas, B.; Grenier, D. Understanding the virulence of Streptococcus suis: A veterinary, medical, and economic challenge. Med. Mal. Infect. 2018, 48, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mancuso, G.; Midiri, A.; Gerace, E.; Biondo, C. Bacterial antibiotic resistance: The most critical pathogens. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. O’Neill, J. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations; Review on Antimicrobial Resistance: London, UK, December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  7. Silver, L.L. Challenges of antibacterial discovery. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 71–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hutchings, M.I.; Truman, A.W.; Wilkinson, B. Antibiotics: Past, present and future. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 51, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bush, K. Antimicrobial agents targeting bacterial cell walls and cell membranes. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2012, 31, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lown, J.W. The mechanism of action of quinone antibiotics. Mol. Cell Biochem. 1983, 55, 17–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Culp, E.; Wright, G.D. Bacterial proteases, untapped antimicrobial drug targets. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. King, A.; Blackledge, M.S. Evaluation of small molecule kinase inhibitors as novel antimicrobial and antibiofilm agents. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2021, 98, 1038–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Steenhuis, M.; van Ulsen, P.; Martin, N.I.; Luirink, J. A ban on BAM: An update on inhibitors of the β-barrel assembly machinery. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2021, 368, fnab059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lanyon-Hogg, T. Targeting the bacterial SOS response for new antimicrobial agents: Drug targets, molecular mechanisms and inhibitors. Future Med. Chem. 2021, 13, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalia, D.; Merey, G.; Nakayama, S.; Zheng, Y.; Zhou, J.; Luo, Y.; Guo, M.; Roembke, B.T.; Sintim, H.O. Nucleotide, c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, cGMP, cAMP, (p)ppGpp signaling in bacteria and implications in pathogenesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 305–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Opoku-Temeng, C.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, Y.; Su, J.; Sintim, H.O. Cyclic dinucleotide (c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, and cGAMP) signalings have come of age to be inhibited by small molecules. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 9327–9342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Corrigan, R.M.; Gründling, A. Cyclic di-AMP: Another second messenger enters the fray. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Römling, U. Great times for small molecules: C-di-AMP, a second messenger candidate in Bacteria and Archaea. Sci. Signal. 2008, 1, pe39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bai, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhou, X.; Ding, X.; Eisele, L.E.; Bai, G. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3586 (DacA) is a diadenylate cyclase that converts ATP or ADP into c-di-AMP. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Yin, W.; Cai, X.; Ma, H.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chou, S.H.; Galperin, M.Y.; He, J. A decade of research on the second messenger c-di-AMP. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 701–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, X.; Li, J.; Xu, X. c-di-AMP regulates bacterial biofilm formation. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 2017, 33, 1369–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fahmi, T.; Port, G.C.; Cho, K.H. c-di-AMP: An essential molecule in the signaling pathways that regulate the viability and virulence of gram-positive bacteria. Genes 2017, 8, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Pham, T.H.; Liang, Z.X.; Marcellin, E.; Turner, M.S. Replenishing the cyclic-di-AMP pool: Regulation of diadenylate cyclase activity in bacteria. Curr. Genet. 2016, 62, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zeden, M.S.; Schuster, C.F.; Bowman, L.; Zhong, Q.; Williams, H.D.; Gründling, A. Cyclic di-adenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP) is required for osmotic regulation in Staphylococcus aureus but dispensable for viability in anaerobic conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 3180–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zarrella, T.M.; Metzger, D.W.; Bai, G. Stress suppressor screening leads to detection of regulation of cyclic di-AMP homeostasis by a Trk Family effector protein in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 2018, 200, e00045-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Tan, C.; Zhang, A.; Chen, H.; Zhou, R. Recent proceedings on prevalence and pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2019, 32, 473–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lun, Z.R.; Wang, Q.P.; Chen, X.G.; Li, A.X.; Zhu, X.Q. Streptococcus suis: An emerging zoonotic pathogen. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2007, 7, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, L.; Fu, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, A. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 signaling: Protective and pathogenic roles on Streptococcal toxic-shock-like syndrome caused by Streptococcus suis. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lin, L.; Xu, L.; Lv, W.; Han, L.; Xiang, Y.; Fu, L.; Jin, M.; Zhou, R.; Chen, H.; Zhang, A. An NLRP3 inflammasome-triggered cytokine storm contributes to Streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome (STSLS). PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, A.; Xie, C.; Chen, H.; Jin, M. Identification of immunogenic cell wall-associated proteins of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Proteomics 2008, 8, 3506–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Segura, M. Streptococcus suis vaccines: Candidate antigens and progress. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2015, 14, 1587–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Devi, M.; Dutta, J.B.; Rajkhowa, S.; Kalita, D.; Saikia, G.K.; Das, B.C.; Hazarika, R.A.; Mahato, G. Prevalence of multiple drug resistant Streptococcus suis in and around Guwahati, India. Vet. World 2017, 10, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Oh, S.I.; Jeon, A.B.; Jung, B.Y.; Byun, J.W.; Gottschalk, M.; Kim, A.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, H.Y. Capsular serotypes, virulence-associated genes and antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolates from pigs in Korea. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2017, 79, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tan, M.F.; Tan, J.; Zeng, Y.B.; Li, H.Q.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, R. Antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes of Streptococcus suis isolated from clinically healthy pigs from 2017 to 2019 in Jiangxi Province, China. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yongkiettrakul, S.; Maneerat, K.; Arechanajan, B.; Malila, Y.; Srimanote, P.; Gottschalk, M.; Visessanguan, W. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis isolated from diseased pigs, asymptomatic pigs, and human patients in Thailand. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Entzeroth, M.; Flotow, H.; Condron, P. Overview of high-throughput screening. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 2009, 44, 9.4.1–9.4.27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, X.D.; Wang, D.; Sun, S.; Zhang, H. Issues of Z-factor and an approach to avoid them for quality control in high-throughput screening studies. Bioinformatics 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, W.; Liu, L.; Qiu, D.; Chen, H.; Zhou, R. Identification of Streptococcus suis serotype 2 genes preferentially expressed in the natural host. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 300, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jeong, H.; Jeong, D.E.; Park, S.H.; Kim, S.J.; Choi, S.K. Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus subtilis Strain WB800N, an Extracellular Protease-Deficient Derivative of Strain 168. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2018, 7, e01380-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Ding, Y.; Zhu, D.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Tan, C. Virulence determinants, antimicrobial susceptibility, and molecular profiles of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae strains isolated from China. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2015, 4, e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zou, G.; Zhou, J.; Xiao, R.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Jin, H.; Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Wu, B.; Qian, P.; et al. Effects of Environmental and Management-Associated Factors on Prevalence and Diversity of Streptococcus suis in Clinically Healthy Pig Herds in China and the United Kingdom. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02590-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Witte, G.; Hartung, S.; Büttner, K.; Hopfner, K.P. Structural biochemistry of a bacterial checkpoint protein reveals diadenylate cyclase activity regulated by DNA recombination intermediates. Mol. Cell 2008, 30, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Krüger, L.; Herzberg, C.; Rath, H.; Pedreira, T.; Ischebeck, T.; Poehlein, A.; Gundlach, J.; Daniel, R.; Völker, U.; Mäder, U.; et al. Essentiality of c-di-AMP in Bacillus subtilis: Bypassing mutations converge in potassium and glutamate homeostasis. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Corrigan, R.M.; Abbott, J.C.; Burhenne, H.; Kaever, V.; Gründling, A. c-di-AMP is a new second messenger in Staphylococcus aureus with a role in controlling cell size and envelope stress. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Commichau, F.M.; Gibhardt, J.; Halbedel, S.; Gundlach, J.; Stülke, J. A delicate connection: C-di-AMP affects cell integrity by controlling osmolyte transport. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Witte, C.E.; Whiteley, A.T.; Burke, T.P.; Sauer, J.D.; Portnoy, D.A.; Woodward, J.J. Cyclic di-AMP is critical for Listeria monocytogenes growth, cell wall homeostasis, and establishment of infection. mBio 2013, 4, e00282-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Oppenheimer-Shaanan, Y.; Wexselblatt, E.; Katzhendler, J.; Yavin, E.; Ben-Yehuda, S. c-di-AMP reports DNA integrity during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zarrella, T.M.; Yang, J.; Metzger, D.W.; Bai, G. Bacterial second messenger cyclic di-AMP modulates the competence state in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, e00691-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kundra, S.; Lam, L.N.; Kajfasz, J.K.; Casella, L.G.; Andersen, M.J.; Abranches, J.; Flores-Mireles, A.L.; Lemos, J.A. c-di-AMP is essential for the virulence of Enterococcus faecalis. Infect. Immun. 2021, 89, e0036521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Commichau, F.M.; Stülke, J. Coping with an essential poison: A genetic suppressor analysis corroborates a key function of c-di-AMP in controlling potassium ion homeostasis in gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 2018, 200, e00166-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Zhou, J.; Sayre, D.A.; Zheng, Y.; Szmacinski, H.; Sintim, H.O. Unexpected complex formation between coralyne and cyclic diadenosine monophosphate providing a simple fluorescent turn-on assay to detect this bacterial second messenger. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 2412–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Opoku-Temeng, C.; Sintim, H.O. Potent inhibition of cyclic diadenylate monophosphate cyclase by the antiparasitic drug, suramin. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3754–3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Opoku-Temeng, C.; Sintim, H.O. Inhibition of cyclic diadenylate cyclase, DisA, by polyphenols. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zheng, Y.; Zhou, J.; Sayre, D.A.; Sintim, H.O. Identification of bromophenol thiohydantoin as an inhibitor of DisA, a c-di-AMP synthase, from a 1000 compound library, using the coralyne assay. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11234–11237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Zhang, J.H.; Chung, T.D.; Oldenburg, K.R. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol. Screen 1999, 4, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ong, C.C.; Gierke, S.; Pitt, C.; Sagolla, M.; Cheng, C.K.; Zhou, W.; Jubb, A.M.; Strickland, L.; Schmidt, M.; Duron, S.G.; et al. Small molecule inhibition of group I p21-activated kinases in breast cancer induces apoptosis and potentiates the activity of microtubule stabilizing agents. Breast Cancer Res. 2015, 17, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Verma, A.; Artham, S.; Alwhaibi, A.; Adil, M.S.; Cummings, B.S.; Somanath, P.R. PAK1 inhibitor IPA-3 mitigates metastatic prostate cancer-induced bone remodeling. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 113943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cheng, X.; Zheng, X.; Zhou, X.; Zeng, J.; Ren, Z.; Xu, X.; Cheng, L.; Li, M.; Li, J.; Li, Y. Regulation of oxidative response and extracellular polysaccharide synthesis by a diadenylate cyclase in Streptococcus mutans. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 904–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Du, B.; Sun, J.H. Diadenylate cyclase evaluation of ssDacA (SSU98_1483) in Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Genet Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 6917–6924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kuželová, K.; Grebeňová, D.; Holoubek, A.; Röselová, P.; Obr, A. Group I PAK inhibitor IPA-3 induces cell death and affects cell adhesivity to fibronectin in human hematopoietic cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Yang, J.; Zhang, Y. I-TASSER server: New development for protein structure and function predictions. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43, W174–W181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Roy, A.; Kucukural, A.; Zhang, Y. I-TASSER: A unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 725–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Roy, A.; Xu, D.; Poisson, J.; Zhang, Y. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods 2015, 12, 7–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Robert, X.; Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W320–W324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Antibiotics 11 00418 g001 550
Figure 1. Purification of the catalytic domain of diadenylate cyclase of S. suis. (A) The predicted topology of S. suis diadenylate cyclase; (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified ssDacA.
Figure 1. Purification of the catalytic domain of diadenylate cyclase of S. suis. (A) The predicted topology of S. suis diadenylate cyclase; (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified ssDacA.
Antibiotics 11 00418 g001
Antibiotics 11 00418 g002 550
Figure 2. Optimization of parameters for the enzymatic reaction of ssDacA. (A) Biochemical reaction of diadenylate cyclase; (B) determination of the optimal ATP concentration. A reaction mixture (10 μL) containing 50 µM ssDacA with varied ATP concentrations of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µM, in the reaction buffer (100 μM ssDacA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl) in a 384-well black plate, was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Then, 10 μL of Kinase Glo® reagent was added to each well. After 10 min, the relative light unit (RLU) values were measured using a microplate spectrophotometer. ΔRLU was calculated referring to wells containing the same amount of ATP but lacking ssDacA. (C) Determination of the optimal ssDacA concentration. The optimal concentration of ssDacA was determined in the presence of the optimal concentration of ATP as described above. (D) Determination of the optimal reaction time. The optimal reaction time was then determined when optimal concentrations of ssDacA and ATP were present as described above. (E) Determination of Z-factor. Enzymatic reactions with 100 replicates of positive wells containing ssDacA (▲) and the 100 replicates of negative wells lacking ssDacA (△) were carried out. The Z-factor was calculated as described in the Materials and Methods.
Figure 2. Optimization of parameters for the enzymatic reaction of ssDacA. (A) Biochemical reaction of diadenylate cyclase; (B) determination of the optimal ATP concentration. A reaction mixture (10 μL) containing 50 µM ssDacA with varied ATP concentrations of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µM, in the reaction buffer (100 μM ssDacA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl) in a 384-well black plate, was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Then, 10 μL of Kinase Glo® reagent was added to each well. After 10 min, the relative light unit (RLU) values were measured using a microplate spectrophotometer. ΔRLU was calculated referring to wells containing the same amount of ATP but lacking ssDacA. (C) Determination of the optimal ssDacA concentration. The optimal concentration of ssDacA was determined in the presence of the optimal concentration of ATP as described above. (D) Determination of the optimal reaction time. The optimal reaction time was then determined when optimal concentrations of ssDacA and ATP were present as described above. (E) Determination of Z-factor. Enzymatic reactions with 100 replicates of positive wells containing ssDacA (▲) and the 100 replicates of negative wells lacking ssDacA (△) were carried out. The Z-factor was calculated as described in the Materials and Methods.
Antibiotics 11 00418 g002
Antibiotics 11 00418 g003 550
Figure 3. Screening for ssDacA inhibitors. (A) The scatter plot of the primary screening with the 1133 compounds; (B) the structure of IPA-3; (C) determination of IC50 of IPA-3 against ssDacA. Reactions containing 100 μM of ssDacA and varied concentrations of IPA-3 (10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200 μM), were performed and the IC50 was calculated using the variable-slope 4-parameter model. The data presented are the means ± standard errors of the mean (n = 3). (D) Inhibition of IPA-3 on the production of c-di-AMP. Reactions containing 50 μM of ssDacA and varied concentrations of IPA-3 (0, 25, 50 μM) were performed in vitro. The produced c-di-AMP was quantified by HPLC. The data presented are the means ± standard errors of the means (n = 3). *** represents p value < 0.001.
Figure 3. Screening for ssDacA inhibitors. (A) The scatter plot of the primary screening with the 1133 compounds; (B) the structure of IPA-3; (C) determination of IC50 of IPA-3 against ssDacA. Reactions containing 100 μM of ssDacA and varied concentrations of IPA-3 (10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200 μM), were performed and the IC50 was calculated using the variable-slope 4-parameter model. The data presented are the means ± standard errors of the mean (n = 3). (D) Inhibition of IPA-3 on the production of c-di-AMP. Reactions containing 50 μM of ssDacA and varied concentrations of IPA-3 (0, 25, 50 μM) were performed in vitro. The produced c-di-AMP was quantified by HPLC. The data presented are the means ± standard errors of the means (n = 3). *** represents p value < 0.001.
Antibiotics 11 00418 g003
Antibiotics 11 00418 g004 550
Figure 4. Antimicrobial efficacy of IPA-3. Cells of (A) S. suis SC19, (B) B. subtilis WB800N, (C) S. aureus ATCC29213, (D) E. rhusiopathiae 13013, (E) S. suis SS2041, (F) S. aureus 1213M4A, (G) S. mutans ATCC25175, and (H) E. coli ATCC25922 were subcultured from a culture grown overnight in an appropriate medium in the absence or presence of the indicated concentrations of IPA-3. The growth was monitored using an automatic growth curve analyzer. The data presented are the means ± standard errors of the means (n = 3).
Figure 4. Antimicrobial efficacy of IPA-3. Cells of (A) S. suis SC19, (B) B. subtilis WB800N, (C) S. aureus ATCC29213, (D) E. rhusiopathiae 13013, (E) S. suis SS2041, (F) S. aureus 1213M4A, (G) S. mutans ATCC25175, and (H) E. coli ATCC25922 were subcultured from a culture grown overnight in an appropriate medium in the absence or presence of the indicated concentrations of IPA-3. The growth was monitored using an automatic growth curve analyzer. The data presented are the means ± standard errors of the means (n = 3).
Antibiotics 11 00418 g004
Antibiotics 11 00418 g005 550
Figure 5. Analysis of the binding mode between IPA-3 and ssDacA. (A) The simulated 3D structure of ssDacA. The amino acid sequence of ssDacA was analyzed using the I-TASSER server. The image was generated by PyMOL software. (B) RMSD plot. The IPA-3 was docked to the simulated structure of ssDacA by using Autodock4 software and a molecular dynamics simulation was performed to further optimize the binding conformation using GROMACS software (2021 version), which generated the RMSD plot. (C) Optimized binding model between IPA-3 and ssDacA. The optimized conformation was taken from the stable and equilibrious time point in the molecular dynamics simulation. The protein–ligand 3D structure was generated using PyMOL software, where the green structure represents IPA-3 and the other structures represent the residues within the binding pocket of ssDacA. (D) Multiple sequence alignment of diadenylate cyclase from different bacteria. Multiple sequence alignment was generated by using MEGA version 6 software and the ESPript 3.0 server based on the amino acid sequence of diadenylate cyclase from each indicated bacterium. The amino acids involved in the interaction are shown in the black boxes.
Figure 5. Analysis of the binding mode between IPA-3 and ssDacA. (A) The simulated 3D structure of ssDacA. The amino acid sequence of ssDacA was analyzed using the I-TASSER server. The image was generated by PyMOL software. (B) RMSD plot. The IPA-3 was docked to the simulated structure of ssDacA by using Autodock4 software and a molecular dynamics simulation was performed to further optimize the binding conformation using GROMACS software (2021 version), which generated the RMSD plot. (C) Optimized binding model between IPA-3 and ssDacA. The optimized conformation was taken from the stable and equilibrious time point in the molecular dynamics simulation. The protein–ligand 3D structure was generated using PyMOL software, where the green structure represents IPA-3 and the other structures represent the residues within the binding pocket of ssDacA. (D) Multiple sequence alignment of diadenylate cyclase from different bacteria. Multiple sequence alignment was generated by using MEGA version 6 software and the ESPript 3.0 server based on the amino acid sequence of diadenylate cyclase from each indicated bacterium. The amino acids involved in the interaction are shown in the black boxes.
Antibiotics 11 00418 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Li, T.; Zou, W.; Ni, M.; Hu, Q.; Qiu, X.; Yao, Z.; Fan, J.; Li, L.; Huang, Q.; et al. IPA-3: An Inhibitor of Diadenylate Cyclase of Streptococcus suis with Potent Antimicrobial Activity. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030418

AMA Style

Li H, Li T, Zou W, Ni M, Hu Q, Qiu X, Yao Z, Fan J, Li L, Huang Q, et al. IPA-3: An Inhibitor of Diadenylate Cyclase of Streptococcus suis with Potent Antimicrobial Activity. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(3):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Haotian, Tingting Li, Wenjin Zou, Minghui Ni, Qiao Hu, Xiuxiu Qiu, Zhiming Yao, Jingyan Fan, Lu Li, Qi Huang, and et al. 2022. "IPA-3: An Inhibitor of Diadenylate Cyclase of Streptococcus suis with Potent Antimicrobial Activity" Antibiotics 11, no. 3: 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030418

APA Style

Li, H., Li, T., Zou, W., Ni, M., Hu, Q., Qiu, X., Yao, Z., Fan, J., Li, L., Huang, Q., & Zhou, R. (2022). IPA-3: An Inhibitor of Diadenylate Cyclase of Streptococcus suis with Potent Antimicrobial Activity. Antibiotics, 11(3), 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop