Next Article in Journal
Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused in an Immunocompetent Patient by the Emergent Monophasic ST34 Variant of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium: Treatment-Associated Selection of Fluoroquinolone and Piperacillin/Tazobactam Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial Activity of the Green Tea Polyphenol (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) against Clinical Isolates of Multidrug-Resistant Vibrio cholerae
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Ishaque et al. Iriflophenone-3-C-β-d Glucopyranoside from Dryopteris ramosa (Hope) C. Chr. with Promising Future as Natural Antibiotic for Gastrointestinal Tract Infections. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1128
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Study on Citrus Oils Antibacterial Activity Measured by Flow Cytometry: A Step-by-Step Development
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/antibiotics11030302
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Antibacterial Activity of Solanum torvum Leaf Extract and Its Synergistic Effect with Oxacillin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphyloccoci Isolated from Dogs

by
Duangdaow Khunbutsri
,
Nattakarn Naimon
,
Khomson Satchasataporn
,
Natnaree Inthong
,
Sarawan Kaewmongkol
,
Samak Sutjarit
,
Chanokchon Setthawongsin
and
Nattakan Meekhanon
*
Department of Veterinary Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(3), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030302
Submission received: 7 January 2022 / Revised: 18 February 2022 / Accepted: 22 February 2022 / Published: 24 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Activity of Natural Products and Plants)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) have been considered a veterinary and public health threat that needs to be addressed, as they are known to cause serious infections, with limited therapeutic options. Thus, in this study, we aimed to examine the potential antibacterial activity of the leaf extract of Solanum torvum against MRS isolated from clinically healthy dogs. In total, seven mecA-positive Staphylococcus isolates tested in this study were identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and all of them were classified as multidrug-resistant using disk diffusion tests. According to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis, the main phytochemical components found in the leaf extract were hexadecanoic acid and its ethyl ester and 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, ethyl ester, (Z,Z,Z). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for the leaf extract against all tested isolates ranged from 2 to 16 mg/mL, while the MIC breakpoints for oxacillin were from 2 to 512 mg/L. Although varying effects were found, the positive effects of the leaf extract were most evident in combination with oxacillin. These results suggested that S. torvum leaf extract may complement classical antibiotics and may potentially drive the development of an effective therapeutic option for MRS.

1. Introduction

Although most staphylococci are commensal bacteria, some of them can cause serious infections of the skin and other tissues in both animals and humans. According to their ability to produce coagulase, staphylococci can be classified into the following two groups: coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Coagulase-positive staphylococci, particularly Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius are commonly involved in infection in humans and companion animals, respectively, while coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are frequently related to nosocomial infection [1,2]. In the last few decades, the incidence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) has seen a steady increase, which has led to it becoming a major concern worldwide. Since MRS can occur in companion animals and the transmission of MRS between animals and humans may potentially occur [3,4], MRS is considered to be a significant threat to public health. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci has mainly been associated with the mecA gene, which encodes a modified penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), causing a low binding affinity to β-lactam antibiotics [5]. In veterinary medicine, infections and colonization with MRS strains have been recognized as a serious problem because of their multidrug resistance and the possibility of transmission to humans. MRS strains are known to be resistant to several classes of antimicrobial agents, including β-lactam antibiotics, so therapeutic options are limited [6,7,8]. Therefore, traditional plant medicine may provide a potential alternative approach to treating and controlling the spread of MRS.
Solanum torvum (Swartz or turkey berry) is a small spiny tree widely distributed in India; China; Southeast Asian countries, including Thailand, Malaysia, and the Philippines; and tropical America. Different parts of this plant, particularly the fruits and leaves, produce antimicrobial effects and could therefore be used as medicinal plants [9,10,11]. Leaf extracts of S. torvum have been shown to effectively inhibit various pathogenic bacterial strains [12], although there is a lack of information regarding the antibacterial activity of S. torvum against antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Due to the limited options for the treatment and control of MRS infection, the leaf extract of S. torvum is a potentially valuable candidate for the management of this public health threat.
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the leaf extract of S. torvum against MRS isolated from clinically healthy dogs. The synergistic effects between the extract and oxacillin were also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Preparation and Extraction

Leaves of S. torvum collected from the Nan province in the northern part of Thailand were used in this study. They were identified and authenticated at the Office of the Forest Herbarium, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Thailand (code: BKF 186114). After air-drying at room temperature, the sampled leaves were ground to a fine powder. Then, approximately 600 g of the leaf powder was extracted with 5400 mL of 95% ethanol, as described in a previous study [12].
The leaf extract was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Merck, Germany) to a final concentration of 50% (v/v) and filtered through No. 1 Whatman filter paper to obtain the crude extract used for the examination of antibacterial activity. The phytochemical components of the crude extract were analyzed using GC-MS with a 6980 GC system (Agilent Technologies; Santa Clara, CA, USA), as described previously [12].

2.2. Bacterial Strains and Identification

In total, seven mecA-positive Staphylococcus isolates collected from the head (n = 2), mouth (n = 3), and nasal cavity (n = 2) of six clinically healthy dogs were used in this study. These three sites of sample collection are considered to be areas of high-frequency contact between dogs and owners. Ethical approval for the animal research was obtained from Kasetsart University (ACKU 01557). The bacterial isolates were cultured on mannitol salt agar (Himedia, India) and presumptively identified as Staphylococcus spp. by Gram staining and catalase tests. After DNA extraction using an E.Z.N.A.® Bacterial DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Doraville, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions, all isolates were definitely identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, as previously described [13], and the results were further analyzed using EzBioCloud (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/) (accessed on 13 May 2021) [14]. In addition, S. aureus ATCC 25923 was used as a quality control strain for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
The detection of mecA was performed using PCR, as described previously [15], with slight modifications. Briefly, the primers used for the amplification of mecA were mecA-1 (5′-AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC-3′) and mecA-2 (5′-AGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTGC-3′), giving a product of 533 bp. The conditions for PCR amplification were as follows: 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were analyzed using gel electrophoresis. After staining with SYBR® green (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA), the bands of the amplified products were visualized using a gel documentation system. Positive and negative controls were included in all reactions.

2.3. Disk Diffusion Tests

Five representative antimicrobial agents from different classes—ciprofloxacin (5 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), and tetracycline (30 µg) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK)—were used for antimicrobial susceptibility tests by disk diffusion, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [16]. In addition, all isolates were tested for methicillin resistance using cefoxitin (30 µg) or oxacillin (1 µg) disk diffusion, as appropriate to the species. The test for detecting inducible clindamycin resistance (D-test) was performed in all isolates according to CLSI [16].

2.4. Microdilution Broth Susceptibility Assay

The determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of crude extracts of S. torvum leaves and oxacillin was performed using the microdilution broth method [16] with slight modifications. Twelve twofold serial dilutions of the extract (256–0.125 mg/mL) and oxacillin (0.512–0.005 mg/L) were prepared in a 96-well microplate. To each well, 100 μL of each dilution of the leaf extract or oxacillin and 100 μL of bacterial suspension in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) with a concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL were added to produce a final bacterial number of approximately 1.5 × 105 CFU per well. Sterility control with only MHB medium and positive control with MHB medium and bacterial inoculum were included in the experiment. In addition, we added DMSO as a negative control at equal concentrations (12.5–0.05% v/v) to those used to dilute the leaf extract. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the bacterial viability was examined by adding p-iodonitrotetrazolium chloride (INT) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the color alteration was observed in the wells containing viable bacteria. Then, the MIC values were determined. The MIC and the more concentrated test dilutions were inoculated into Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK); then, the MBC values were further determined after an overnight incubation at 37 °C. The assays were independently performed in triplicate.

2.5. Synergistic Interaction Analysis

To determine the potential synergistic antibacterial activity of the leaf extract of S. torvum and oxacillin, the checkerboard method was used [17]. Briefly, the leaf extract was diluted twofold in MHB along the vertical rows of the 96-well microplate, while oxacillin was cross-diluted horizontally by twofold serial dilution. Bacterial suspension was added into each well to produce a final concentration of 1.5 × 105 CFU/mL. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After adding INT and incubating at 37 °C for 30 min, the bacterial growth was assessed by observing the color of the solution. The tests were carried out in triplicate.
Synergistic effects were determined based on the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). The FICI was calculated as follows:
FIC oxacillin = MIC oxacillin in combination/MIC oxacillin alone;
FIC leaf extract = MIC leaf extract in combination/MIC leaf extract alone;
FICI = FIC oxacillin + FIC leaf extract.
The FICI value was evaluated as follows: synergy (FICI < 0.5), partial synergy (0.5 ≤ FICI ≤ 0.75), additive (0.76 ≤ FICI ≤ 1), indifference (1 < FICI ≤ 4), or antagonism (FICI > 4) [18]. The averages of MICs obtained from three independent experiments were used for these equations.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All tests were independently performed in triplicate. The differences between the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with repeated measures in SPSS version 28.0.1.0 (142) (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The p-values were considered statistically significant at ≤0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Resistance Profiles of Bacterial Strains

As shown in Table 1, seven mecA-positive Staphylococcus isolates were identified as Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. schleiferi (n = 1), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 2), Staphylococcus intermedius (n = 3), and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (n = 1), using 16S rDNA sequencing. These staphylococcal species are commensals on skin and mucous membranes and can cause infections in both humans and animals [19,20,21,22].
According to the results from disk diffusion tests, all isolates were found to be resistant to at least three classes of antimicrobial agents and were therefore considered to be multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria [23]. Their resistance profiles are presented in Table 1. Among the isolates used in this study, those isolated from the nasal cavities and mouths of dogs tended to be resistant to most antimicrobial agents tested. One isolate from the nasal cavities of dogs (DN41) and two isolates from the mouths of dogs (DN11 and DN40) which were identified as S. intermedius, as well as one S. pseudintermedius isolate (DN73) from a dog’s mouth, were resistant to all tested antimicrobials. By D-test, two phenotypes were observed among the isolates tested in this study. S. schleiferi subsp. schleiferi (DN2) was erythromycin-sensitive and clindamycin-sensitive, indicating a susceptible phenotype, while the other six isolates showed resistance to both erythromycin and clindamycin, indicating a constitutive macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) phenotype.
Although information on methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) in pets is rare compared with that on methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), these results suggested that a considerable amount of antimicrobial resistance was present in CoNS and other commensal bacteria in healthy pets. Since a high prevalence of MRS has previously been reported in healthy dogs [24] and the transfer of methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) among pets, humans, and the environment has evidently occurred [3], people who have close contact with pets would be at increased risk of transmission of these MRS bacteria.
MRS (including MRCoNS) are potentially a neglected risk to public health. Therefore, the use of natural extracts or combinations of extracts and existing antimicrobial agents may provide effective alternative options for the treatment and prevention of MRS bacteria.

3.2. Phytochemical Components of Leaf Extract

An ethanol extraction of S. torvum leaves was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The phytochemical components of the extract and their potential biological activities are shown in Table 2. In total, 11 chemical compounds, including fatty acid ethyl esters, fatty acids, diterpenes, indoles, and alkanes, made up 60.12% of the total extract, as determined by GC fraction (Supplementary Figure S1). The major components were hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester (11.13%), followed by hexadecanoic acid (8.63%) and 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, ethyl ester, (Z,Z,Z) (7.47%). These compounds have also been identified in extracts of the fruit of S. torvum [25] and other plants [26,27,28]. The common biological activities of the abundant compounds of S. torvum leaf extract are antibacterial and anti-inflammatory. Consistent with a previous study, hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester, and 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, ethyl ester, (Z,Z,Z), were identified as major components of other leaf extracts which had potent activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as MRSA [28]. Hexadecanoic acid and its methyl and ethyl esters have previously been reported to exhibit antituberculotic activity in actinobacteria [29]. It is, therefore, suggested that the major phytochemical compounds (hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester, hexadecanoic acid, 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, ethyl ester, (Z,Z,Z) found in our leaf extract play a crucial role in bacterial inhibition.
The GC-MS results showed that neophytadiene was found twice, in peaks No. 4 and 10 (Table 2, Supplementary Figure S1). However, due to their different retention times, these two peaks were possibly related compounds with slightly different chemical structures.

3.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Synergistic Interaction Analysis

The results from MIC and checkerboard analysis are presented in Table 3. All isolates were phenotypically confirmed as MRS (MIC of oxacillin ≥ 0.5 mg/L) [16]. They had MIC and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values ranging from 2 to 512 mg/L for oxacillin, with the MIC and MBC values of S. torvum leaf extract ranging from 2 to 16 mg/mL and 8 to 64 mg/mL, respectively. Three S. intermedius isolates—DN11, DN40, and DN41—which were resistant to all antimicrobial agents tested also showed high MIC values for oxacillin. However, the leaf extract exhibited effective antibacterial activity against these three isolates, with an MIC range of 2–4 mg/mL. Similarly, the leaf extract of S. torvum has been reported to be effective against several pathogenic bacteria [12] and mycotoxigenic fungi [39].
The combination of oxacillin and S. torvum leaf extract exhibited varying antibacterial effects against the MRS strains tested (Table 3 and Figure 1). Although no antagonism was detected, only limited effects were found for 2/7 isolates. Synergistic and partially synergistic effects were observed for 4/7 isolates, while an additive effect was noted in one isolate of S. intermedius. The positive interaction was observed against all staphylococcal species used in this study—S. schleiferi, S. epidermidis, S. intermedius, and S. pseudintermedius—indicating the potential of the use of S. torvum leaf extract in combination with common antibiotics to counteract MRS.
The cytotoxic effects of crude extract of S. torvum leaves were previously evaluated in vitro. Since the antimycobacterial activity of S. torvum leaves has been observed, the cytotoxic potential of S. torvum leaf extract was investigated against a human fetal lung fibroblast cell line [40]. Although the notable cytotoxicity of several compounds of S. torvum aerial parts against human cancer cell lines was identified [41,42], the S. torvum leaf extract was found to be safe in a human fetal lung fibroblast cell line, supporting the traditional use of these leaves to treat respiratory tract disorders [40].
Due to the limited therapeutic options available for the treatment of MRS infections, novel alternatives, particularly phytopharmaceuticals, have been attracting increasing interest. The antimicrobial activity of several natural product extracts, and the synergistic effects between the extracts and antimicrobial agents, have been investigated. The antibacterial activity of various leaf extracts and their synergy with antibiotics against MRSA have previously been observed [43,44]. The combination of methicillin or penicillin G and essential oil has recently been reported to be effective against MRSA [45]. In this study, we demonstrated the potent activity of S. torvum leaf extract against MRCoNS and MRSP. The major components, hexadecanoic acid and its ethyl esters, are likely to be the bioactive compounds detected in our crude extract. However, further study regarding the antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties, and cytotoxic effects of these purified compounds is required to elucidate the antibacterial mechanism and the possibility of their use in vivo.

4. Conclusions

Methicillin-resistant staphylococci known to possess multidrug-resistant traits were isolated from healthy dogs. In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial activity of the crude extract of Solanum torvum leaves against the tested isolates and identified positive interactions between the extract and oxacillin. The results highlight S. torvum as a promising therapeutic option for methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11030302/s1: Figure S1: Chemical composition of ethanolic extract of S. torvum leaves.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K. and N.M.; methodology, D.K., N.N., K.S. and C.S.; validation, N.I., S.S. and N.M.; investigation, D.K., S.S. and C.S.; resources, N.N., S.K. and N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; writing—review and editing, N.M.; supervision, S.S., C.S. and N.M.; funding acquisition, D.K. and N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Graduate Program Scholarship from the Graduate School, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand and the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Argemi, X.; Hansmann, Y.; Prola, K.; Prévost, G. Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Pathogenomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kmieciak, W.; Szewczyk, E.M. Are zoonotic Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains a growing threat for humans? Folia Microbiol. 2018, 63, 743–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Feßler, A.T.; Schuenemann, R.; Kadlec, K.; Hensel, V.; Brombach, J.; Murugaiyan, J.; Oechtering, G.; Burgener, I.A.; Schwarz, S. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) among employees and in the environment of a small animal hospital. Vet. Microbiol. 2018, 221, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ortiz-Díez, G.; López, R.; Sánchez-Díaz, A.M.; Turrientes, M.C.; Baquero, M.R.; Luque, R.; Maroto, A.; Fernández, C.; Ayllón, T. Epidemiology of the colonization and acquisition of methicillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in dogs hospitalized in a clinic veterinary hospital in Spain. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 72, 101501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Loncaric, I.; Tichy, A.; Handler, S.; Szostak, M.P.; Tickert, M.; Diab-Elschahawi, M.; Spergser, J.; Künzel, F. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus sp. (MRS) in different companion animals and determination of risk factors for colonization with MRS. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gold, R.M.; Cohen, N.D.; Lawhon, S.D. Amikacin resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from dogs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 3641–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kizerwetter-Świda, M.; Chrobak-Chmiel, D.; Rzewuska, M. High-level mupirocin resistance in methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolated from dogs and cats. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moodley, A.; Damborg, P.; Nielsen, S.S. Antimicrobial resistance in methicillin susceptible and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius of canine origin: Literature review from 1980 to 2013. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 171, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gandhi, G.R.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Paulraj, M.G. Solanum torvum Swartz. fruit containing phenolic compounds shows antidiabetic and antioxidant effects in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 2725–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chah, K.F.; Muko, K.N.; Oboegbulem, S.I. Antimicrobial activity of methanolic extract of Solanum torvum fruit. Fitoterapia 2000, 71, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bari, M.; Islam, W.; Khan, A.; Mandal, A. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of Solanum torvum (Solanaceae). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2010, 12, 386–390. [Google Scholar]
  12. Naimon, N.; Pongchairerk, U.; Suebkhampet, A. Phytochemical analysis and antibacterial activity of ethanolic leaf extract of solanum torvum Sw. against pathogenic bacteria. Kasetsart J. (Natl. Sci.) 2015, 49, 516–523. [Google Scholar]
  13. Arai, R.; Tominaga, K.; Wu, M.; Okura, M.; Ito, K.; Okamura, N.; Onishi, H.; Osaki, M.; Sugimura, Y.; Yoshiyama, M.; et al. Diversity of Melissococcus plutonius from honeybee larvae in Japan and experimental reproduction of European foulbrood with cultured atypical isolates. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Murakami, K.; Minamide, W.; Wada, K.; Nakamura, E.; Teraoka, H.; Watanabe, S. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991, 29, 2240–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 30th ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2020; ISBN 978-1-68440-067-6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Omokhua, A.G.; Ondua, M.; Van Staden, J.; McGaw, L.J. Synergistic activity of extracts of three South African alien invasive weeds combined with conventional antibiotics against selected opportunistic pathogens. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 124, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mun, S.H.; Joung, D.K.; Kim, Y.S.; Kang, O.H.; Kim, S.B.; Seo, Y.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Lee, D.S.; Shin, D.W.; Kweon, K.T.; et al. Synergistic antibacterial effect of curcumin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Phytomedicine 2013, 20, 714–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. May, E.R.; Hnilica, K.A.; Frank, L.A.; Jones, R.D.; Bemis, D.A. Isolation of Staphylococcus schleiferi from healthy dogs and dogs with otitis, pyoderma, or both. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2005, 227, 928–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McManus, B.A.; Coleman, D.C.; Deasy, E.C.; Brennan, G.I.; O’Connell, B.; Monecke, S.; Ehricht, R.; Leggett, B.; Leonard, N.; Shore, A.C. Comparative Genotypes, Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance amongst Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus Isolates from Infections in Humans and Companion Animals. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138079. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, N.; Neilan, A.M.; Klompas, M. Staphylococcus intermedius infections: Case report and literature review. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2013, 5, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bhooshan, S.; Negi, V.; Khatri, P.K. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: An undocumented, emerging pathogen in humans. GMS Hyg. Infect. Control 2020, 15, Doc32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Rafailidis, P.I.; Kofteridis, D. Proposed amendments regarding the definitions of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant bacteria. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2021, 14, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Han, J.I.; Yang, C.H.; Park, H.M. Prevalence and risk factors of Staphylococcus spp. carriage among dogs and their owners: A cross-sectional study. Vet. J. 2016, 212, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jaabir, M.S.M.; Vigneshwaran, R.; Ehtisham Ul Hassan, T.M.; Kumar, S.S. Study on the antimicrobial activity of ethanolic extract of the fruits of Solanum torvum and its phytochemical analysis by GC-MS. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2010, 3, 117–121. [Google Scholar]
  26. Joshua, P.E.; Anosike, C.J.; Asomadu, R.O.; Ekpo, D.E.; Uhuo, E.N.; Nwodo, O.F.C. Bioassay-guided fractionation, phospholipase A2-inhibitory activity and structure elucidation of compounds from leaves of Schumanniophyton magnificum. Pharm. Biol. 2020, 58, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fernandes, C.P.; Corrêa, A.L.; Lobo, J.F.; Caramel, O.P.; de Almeida, F.B.; Castro, E.S.; Souza, K.F.; Burth, P.; Amorim, L.M.; Santos, M.G.; et al. Triterpene esters and biological activities from edible fruits of Manilkara subsericea (Mart.) Dubard, Sapotaceae. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 280810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Musa, A.M.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Aliyu, A.B.; Abdullahi, M.S.; Tajuddeen, N.; Ibrahim, H.; Oyewale, A.O. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of hexane leaf extract of Anisopus mannii (Asclepiadaceae). J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 4, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hussain, A.; Rather, M.A.; Shah, A.M.; Bhat, Z.S.; Shah, A.; Ahmad, Z.; Parvaiz Hassan, Q. Antituberculotic activity of actinobacteria isolated from the rare habitats. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 65, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Girija, S.; Duraipandiyan, V.; Kuppusamy, P.S.; Gajendran, H.; Rajagopal, R. Chromatographic Characterization and GC-MS Evaluation of the Bioactive Constituents with Antimicrobial Potential from the Pigmented Ink of Loligo duvauceli. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 820745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sunita, A.; Kumar, G.; Meena, S. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy analysis of root of an economically important plant, Cenchrus ciliaris L. from Thar desert, Rajasthan (India). Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jalalvand, A.R.; Zhaleh, M.; Goorani, S.; Zangeneh, M.M.; Seydi, N.; Zangeneh, A.; Moradi, R. Chemical characterization and antioxidant, cytotoxic, antibacterial, and antifungal properties of ethanolic extract of Allium saralicum R.M. Fritsch leaves rich in linolenic acid, methyl ester. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2019, 192, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Huang, C.B.; Alimova, Y.; Myers, T.M.; Ebersole, J.L. Short- and medium-chain fatty acids exhibit antimicrobial activity for oral microorganisms. Arch. Oral Biol. 2011, 56, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Balaji, M.; Dhanapal, T.; Vinayagam, S.; Balakumar, B. Anticancer, antioxidant activity and GC-MS analysis of selected micro algal members of chlorophyceae. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2017, 8, 3302–3314. [Google Scholar]
  35. Krishnaveni, M.; Dhanalakshmi, R.; Nandhini, N. GC-MS Analysis of phytchemicals,Fatty acid Profile, Antimicrobial Activity of Gossypium Seeds. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2014, 27, 273–276. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dubey, P.; Jayant, S.; Srivastava, N. Preliminary phytochemical screening, FTIR and GC-MS analyses of aqueous, ethanolic and methanolic extracts of stem of Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Miers for search of antidiabetic compounds. Ann. Phytomed. 2016, 8, 2020–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mannaa, M.; Kim, K.D. Biocontrol Activity of Volatile-Producing Bacillus megaterium and Pseudomonas protegens Against Aspergillus and Penicillium spp. Predominant in Stored Rice Grains: Study II. Mycobiology 2018, 46, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mariastuti, H.D.; Listiyowati, S.R.I.; Wahyudi, A.T. Antifungal activity of soybean rhizosphere actinomycetes producing bioactive compounds against Fusarium oxysporum. Biodiversitas 2018, 19, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abhishek, R.U.; Thippeswamy, S.; Manjunath, K.; Mohana, D.C. Antifungal and antimycotoxigenic potency of Solanum torvum Swartz. leaf extract: Isolation and identification of compound active against mycotoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 1624–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Nguta, J.M.; Appiah-Opong, R.; Nyarko, A.K.; Yeboah-Manu, D.; Addo, P.G.; Otchere, I.; Kissi-Twum, A. Antimycobacterial and cytotoxic activity of selected medicinal plant extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 182, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Nguyen, H.M.; Nguyen, N.Y.T.; Chau, N.T.N.; Nguyen, A.B.T.; Tran, V.K.T.; Hoang, V.; Le, T.M.; Wang, H.-C.; Yen, C.-H. Bioassay-Guided Discovery of Potential Partial Extracts with Cytotoxic Effects on Liver Cancer Cells from Vietnamese Medicinal Herbs. Processes 2021, 9, 1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yousaf, Z.; Wang, Y.; Baydoun, E. Phytochemistry and pharmacological studies on Solanum torvum Swartz. J. App. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 3, 152–160. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chakraborty, S.; Afaq, N.; Singh, N.; Majumdar, S. Antimicrobial activity of Cannabis sativa, Thuja orientalis and Psidium guajava leaf extracts against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Integr. Med. 2018, 16, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kuok, C.F.; Hoi, S.O.; Hoi, C.F.; Chan, C.H.; Fong, I.H.; Ngok, C.K.; Meng, L.R.; Fong, P. Synergistic antibacterial effects of herbal extracts and antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A computational and experimental study. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 731–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kwiatkowski, P.; Łopusiewicz, Ł.; Pruss, A.; Kostek, M.; Sienkiewicz, M.; Bonikowski, R.; Wojciechowska-Koszko, I.; Dołęgowska, B. Antibacterial activity of selected essential oil compounds alone and in combination with β-lactam antibiotics against MRSA strains. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 11 00302 g001 550
Figure 1. Isobolograms showing the synergy (FIC index ≤ 0.5), partial synergy (0.5 ≤ FICI ≤ 0.75), additive (0.76 ≤ FICI ≤ 1), and indifference (1 < FICI ≤ 4) effects of oxacillin and S. torvum leaf extract: interaction assays with oxacillin against methicillin-resistant staphylococci strains ▲ DN 2; ▼ DN 10; ● DN 11; ○ DN 18; ∆ DN 40; ∇ DN 41; ■ DN 73; □ S. aureus ATCC25923. Isobolograms were plotted using the GraphPad Prism, ver. 9.0, software to present the FIC index of the combinations.
Figure 1. Isobolograms showing the synergy (FIC index ≤ 0.5), partial synergy (0.5 ≤ FICI ≤ 0.75), additive (0.76 ≤ FICI ≤ 1), and indifference (1 < FICI ≤ 4) effects of oxacillin and S. torvum leaf extract: interaction assays with oxacillin against methicillin-resistant staphylococci strains ▲ DN 2; ▼ DN 10; ● DN 11; ○ DN 18; ∆ DN 40; ∇ DN 41; ■ DN 73; □ S. aureus ATCC25923. Isobolograms were plotted using the GraphPad Prism, ver. 9.0, software to present the FIC index of the combinations.
Antibiotics 11 00302 g001
Table
Table 1. Information about the isolates and their resistance profiles.
Table 1. Information about the isolates and their resistance profiles.
IsolateBacterial Species Identified by
16s rDNA Sequencing		Similarity (%)/
Completeness (%)		SourceResistant Profiles
DN 2Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. schleiferi99.86/100HeadCIP, TE, OX
DN 10 1Staphylococcus epidermidis100/100HeadDA, E, TE, OX
DN 11 1Staphylococcus intermedius99.93/100MouthCIP, DA, E, SXT, TE, OX
DN 18Staphylococcus epidermidis100/100Nasal cavitiesDA, E, TE, OX
DN 40Staphylococcus intermedius99.93/100MouthCIP, DA, E, SXT, TE, OX
DN 41Staphylococcus intermedius99.93/100Nasal cavitiesCIP, DA, E, SXT, TE, OX
DN 73Staphylococcus pseudintermedius100/99.5MouthCIP, DA, E, SXT, TE, OX
QC strainStaphylococcus aureus ATCC25923---
1 The isolates were recovered from the same dog. CIP, ciprofloxacin (5 µg); DA, clindamycin (2 µg); E, erythromycin (15 µg); SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg); TE, tetracycline (30 µg); OX, cefoxitin (30 µg) or oxacillin (1 µg).
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition of ethanolic extract of S. torvum leaves.
Table 2. Chemical composition of ethanolic extract of S. torvum leaves.
Peak No.Chemical CompoundFormulaRetention Time (min)Area (%)Biological Activity
1TetradecaneC14H3026.280.90Antimicrobial [30]
2OctadecaneC18H3838.251.58Antimicrobial [30]
3Heptadecane, 8-methyl-C18H3849.451.87Anticancer, pest repellent, sex pheromone [31]
4NeophytadieneC20H3851.304.58Antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal [32]
5Hexadecanoic acidC16H32O259.138.63Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant [33,34]
6Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl esterC18H36O259.4411.13Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory [26]
7Linoleic acid ethyl esterC20H36O267.156.07Antibacterial, antifungal [35]
89, 12, 15-Octadecatrienoic acid, ethyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-C20H34O267.407.47Anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant [28]
9Heptadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, ethyl esterC20H40O268.824.52Antidiabetic, antioxidant [36]
10NeophytadieneC20H3869.661.85Antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal [32]
115-Methyl-2-phenyl-1H-IndoleC15H13N83.625.05Antimicrobial, antifungal [37]
121,1-Dicyano-2-methyl-4-(p-cyanophenyl) propeneC13H9N384.656.47Antifungal, insecticidal [38]
Table
Table 3. Synergistic activity of the S. torvum leaf extract with oxacillin against methicillin-resistant staphylococci.
Table 3. Synergistic activity of the S. torvum leaf extract with oxacillin against methicillin-resistant staphylococci.
IsolateBacterial StrainsMBCMIC AloneMIC CombinationFIC IndexInterpretation
Oxacillin
(mg/L)		Extract
(mg/mL)		Oxacillin
(mg/L)		Extract
(mg/mL)		Oxacillin
(mg/L)		Extract
(mg/mL)
DN 2S. schleiferi subsp. schleiferi8642160.580.75Partial synergy
DN 10 1S. epidermidis64326446421.5Indifference
DN 11 1S. intermedius2568256412810.75Partial synergy
DN 18S. epidermidis12832648220.28Synergistic
DN 40S. intermedius51216512212821.25Indifference
DN 41S. intermedius51216256412821Additive
DN 73S. pseudintermedius232240.510.5Synergy
ControlS. aureus ATCC259231160.5160.581.5Indifference
1 The isolates were recovered from the same dog. The values are presented as the average from three independent experiments.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khunbutsri, D.; Naimon, N.; Satchasataporn, K.; Inthong, N.; Kaewmongkol, S.; Sutjarit, S.; Setthawongsin, C.; Meekhanon, N. Antibacterial Activity of Solanum torvum Leaf Extract and Its Synergistic Effect with Oxacillin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphyloccoci Isolated from Dogs. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030302

AMA Style

Khunbutsri D, Naimon N, Satchasataporn K, Inthong N, Kaewmongkol S, Sutjarit S, Setthawongsin C, Meekhanon N. Antibacterial Activity of Solanum torvum Leaf Extract and Its Synergistic Effect with Oxacillin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphyloccoci Isolated from Dogs. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(3):302. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khunbutsri, Duangdaow, Nattakarn Naimon, Khomson Satchasataporn, Natnaree Inthong, Sarawan Kaewmongkol, Samak Sutjarit, Chanokchon Setthawongsin, and Nattakan Meekhanon. 2022. "Antibacterial Activity of Solanum torvum Leaf Extract and Its Synergistic Effect with Oxacillin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphyloccoci Isolated from Dogs" Antibiotics 11, no. 3: 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030302

APA Style

Khunbutsri, D., Naimon, N., Satchasataporn, K., Inthong, N., Kaewmongkol, S., Sutjarit, S., Setthawongsin, C., & Meekhanon, N. (2022). Antibacterial Activity of Solanum torvum Leaf Extract and Its Synergistic Effect with Oxacillin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphyloccoci Isolated from Dogs. Antibiotics, 11(3), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11030302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop