Next Article in Journal
Toward a New Future for Essential Oils
Previous Article in Journal
Vapor Phosphorylation of Cellulose by Phosphorus Trichlo-Ride: Selective Phosphorylation of 6-Hydroxyl Function—The Synthesis of New Antimicrobial Cellulose 6-Phosphate(III)-Copper Complexes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/antibiotics10020206
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Slaughtered Pigs and Pork in the Central Region of Thailand

by
Wimonrat Tanomsridachchai
1,
Kanjana Changkaew
2,
Ruchirada Changkwanyeun
3,
Watsawan Prapasawat
4,
Apiradee Intarapuk
4,
Yukari Fukushima
1,
Nattapong Yamasamit
2,
Thoko Flav Kapalamula
1,
Chie Nakajima
1,5,
Orasa Suthienkul
2,6 and
Yasuhiko Suzuki
1,5,*
1
Division of Bioresources, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
2
Faculty of Public Health, Thammasat University (Rangsit Campus), Pathumthani 12121, Thailand
3
Faculty of Public Health, Thammasat University (Lampang Campus), Lampang 52190, Thailand
4
Department of Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mahanakorn University of Technology, Bangkok 10530, Thailand
5
International Collaboration Unit, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
6
Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(2), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020206
Submission received: 17 January 2021 / Revised: 11 February 2021 / Accepted: 15 February 2021 / Published: 19 February 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been a major public health concern in humans. Among MRSA, livestock-associated (LA)-MRSA strains have always been associated with exposure to livestock or their products and have emerged in different countries globally. Although studies have identified LA-MRSA from healthy pigs and pork in Thailand, prevalence in slaughtered pigs is still unknown. In addition, there are few reports on the epidemiology and molecular characteristics of LA-MRSA in Thailand. Hence, this is the first report investigating the epidemiology and molecular characteristics of MRSA in individual slaughtered pigs and pork in Thailand. A total of 204 nasal swab and 116 retailed pork samples were collected from three slaughterhouses and four fresh markets, respectively. Individual samples were used for screening for MRSA and obtained isolates were examined for drug- resistance profiling for 12 antimicrobial agents of 10 drug classes. In addition, SCCmec typing and multi-locus sequence typing were conducted to obtain genotype profiles. MRSA were isolated from 11 and 52 nasal swab and pork samples, respectively. The prevalence was significantly higher in the pork than in the nasal swab samples (p-value < 0.05). A high prevalence of ST9-SCCmecIX and ST398-SCCmecV with high-level antimicrobial resistance from markets and slaughterhouses indicated the spreading of MRSA with these genotypes in the Thai swine processing chains and suggested the need for further investigation to determine a control.

1. Introduction

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been a major public health concern as it causes nosocomial infections leading to high mortality and morbidity in humans [1]. MRSA strains with resistance to a wide range of antibiotics have been found in various sources globally [2,3,4] and are classified into three broad groups, namely, healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA), community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), and livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) based on the source of infection [5]. The majority of MRSA infections originate from hospitals and other healthcare facilities and spread into the community [2]. CA-MRSA has been increasingly reported in communities among people without prior history of risk factors to MRSA infections [6]. LA-MRSA strains have always been associated with exposure to livestock or their products and have emerged in different countries in Europe, America, and Asia [7,8]. The most prominent LA-MRSA strain in Europe and America belongs to sequence type 398 (ST398) whereas that in most Asia countries belongs to ST9 [9,10,11,12,13]. MRSA types have divergent genetic backgrounds, hence different MRSA strains carry different types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) [7]. LA-MRSA belonging to ST398 has been reported to colonize livestock and people with close contact to them such as farmers and veterinarians [14,15,16].
However, infections by LA-MRSA were also found in people without livestock exposure [17,18]. ST398 and several others (ST9, ST97, ST5) have been isolated from pork, chicken, beef, and milk in many countries [19]. These finding demonstrate that handling and/or consumption of food-producing animals contaminated by MRSA is a potential zoonotic transmission source for humans [20,21]. When MRSA-carrying animals are slaughtered, MRSA may spread to carcasses, to the environment, and to abattoir workers. Moreover, if animal products are contaminated, MRSA can enter the human food chain [6]. Therefore, LA-MRSA has become an important public health issue that warrants intensive monitoring.
Thailand has a positive trend for the production and export of pork and live pigs especially to ASEAN countries and domestic pork consumption increased 2–3% from 2011 to 2016 [22]. As the central region of Thailand is the main pig production area [23], the risk of zoonotic transmission of LA-MRSA through pigs and/or pig products is high [24]. Although some studies have identified LA-MRSA from healthy pigs [13,25], and pork [26] in Thailand, the prevalence in slaughtered pigs is still unknown. Moreover, there is only one report on the description of the epidemiology and molecular characteristics of LA-MRSA from slaughtered pigs and pork in Thailand [7]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence, molecular characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance pattern of MRSA isolated from slaughtered pigs and retail pork in the central region of Thailand.

2. Results

2.1. Prevalence of MRSA

Among 204 nasal swab samples of pigs from three slaughterhouses and 116 pork samples from four markets, 63 (19.7%) were positive for MRSA based on the presence of the mecA (Table 1). The prevalence was significantly higher in pork samples (44.8%; 52/116) than in nasal swab samples (5.4%; 11/204) (p-value < 0.05) (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). No MRSA was found in nasal swab samples from slaughterhouse C in both year (2017 and 2018) or in pork samples from market D in the first year (2017). Among nasal swab samples, the highest prevalence of MRSA was found at slaughterhouse A (11.8%; 8/68). For pork samples, the highest prevalence of MRSA was found at market F (58.3%; 7/12) followed by market G (50.0%; 8/16), market E (48.0%; 36/75), and market D (7.7%; 1/13). There were no significant differences between the sampling years (Table 1). In total, 67 MRSA isolates, 11 from nasal swab and 56 from pork samples, were used for further analyses (Table 1 and Table 2).

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Drug susceptibility tests utilizing 12 antimicrobial agents of 10 drug classes revealed that all examined isolates were resistant to ampicillin and cefoxitin, and various degrees of resistance were observed in other 10 antimicrobial agents with all isolates susceptible to vancomycin as shown in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3. There was no statistically significant difference between nasal swab and pork samples in the prevalence of each antimicrobial resistance (Fisher’s test; p-value > 0.05). All MRSA isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR) and classified into 18 different patterns of resistance (Supplementary Table S2). Six and 16 different patterns of drug resistance were observed in isolates from nasal swabs and pork samples, respectively. Nevertheless, it was found that all of isolates showed resistance to at least two of the non-β-lactams antimicrobial classes. All isolates from nasal swab samples were MDR, resulting in resistance to at least three non-β-lactams antimicrobial classes, whereas only 39 (69.6%) MRSA isolates from pork samples were MDR. The antimicrobial resistance profile of ampicillin-oxacillin-cefoxitin-clindamycin-tetracycline (AMP-OXA-FOX-CLI-TET), was the highest in frequency (23.9%; 16/67) and found only in pork samples from Market E (in 2017) and market F (both 2017 and 2018), followed by AMP-OXA-FOX-chloramphenicol(CHL)-CLI-enrofloxacin(ERY)-ciprofloxacin(CIP)-erythromycin(ENR)-gentamicin(GEN)-TET (16.4%; 11/67) and AMP-OXA-FOX-CHL-CLI-CIP-ENR-GEN-TET (16.4%; 11/67) found in both nasal and pork samples. The other antimicrobial resistance patterns, which were mainly found in pork samples for both years, were diverse and low in number.

2.3. Molecular Characteristics (by Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) and SCCmec Typing) of MRSA Isolates

MRSA isolates were differentiated into four SCCmec types and four STs. SCCmec type IX was the most prevalent (68.7%; 46/67), followed by SCCmec type V (26.9%; 18/67) and SCCmec type IV (1.5%; 1/67), while two isolates (3.0%), consisting of class C2 mec complex but negative amplification of ccr complex were nontypeable (NT). The most frequently found ST was ST9 (70.1%; 47/67) followed by ST398 (26.9%; 18/67), ST779 (1.5%; 1/67), and ST5639 (1.5%; 1/67) (Table 3). ST5639 was a new single-locus variant of ST9 with a substitution mutation (G52T) of glpF, resulting in allelic profile 3-3-111-1-1-1-10, which belonged to clonal complex (CC)9. The five different genotype profiles were identified where ST9-SCCmec IX was predominant in both nasal swabs and pork samples. ST398-SCCmec V was identified at market F (in both years), market E (only in the first year), and at slaughterhouse A (only in the first year). MRSA at market E in the first year (2017) showed the most diverse molecular characteristic profiles (Table 2). Four samples were found to carry two strains with different genotype profiles in each. The characteristic genotype profile of ST9-SCCmec IX and ST398-SCCmec V were found in a pork sample from market E and two pork samples from market F. Moreover, ST398-SCCmec V and ST9-SCCmec NT were found in a pork sample from market E.

2.4. Association between Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Typing

Antimicrobial resistance rates obtained for five different genotype profiles are shown in Table 3 and Figure 1. ST9-SCCmec IX isolates showed significantly higher rates of resistance (p-value < 0.05) than isolates with other genotype profiles, exhibiting high prevalence of resistance to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, gentamicin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Among ST398-SCCmec V isolates (n = 18), the antimicrobial resistance pattern AMP-OXA-FOX-CLI-TE was found with the highest frequency in pork samples from markets (88.9%; 16/18) (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S2). All MRSA ST398-SCCmec V from market F in both years exhibited the same antimicrobial resistance profile, whereas one MRSA isolate from market E in the first year was different in antimicrobial resistance pattern.

3. Discussion

This study investigated the distribution of MRSA in individual slaughtered pigs and pork in markets at central region of Thailand. This is the first report investigating the epidemiology and molecular characteristics of MRSA in individual slaughtered pigs and pork in Thailand.
The prevalence of MRSA in nasal swab samples observed in this study (11/204; 5.4%) was lower than that in European countries such as Latvia (17/100; 17%) [27] and other Asian countries such as China (38/590; 6.4%) [28]. We estimated the prevalence of MRSA isolated from pork as 44.8% (52/116), which is slightly lower than that in the earlier study in the central region of Thailand (50%;5/10) [26]. In contrast, our study results were higher than 1.8–15.8% among pork in European countries [29], 3.6–9.6% in North American countries [30,31], and 7.1–21.5% in some Asian countries [32,33]. The prevalence may vary depending on several factors, such as geographical area, sampling methods, sample size, collection period, and laboratory methodologies.
In our study, the frequently-observed STs were ST9 and ST398 which are known to be associated with animals. These are major endemic MRSA clones circulating in pigs in the central region of Thailand [24,26]. ST9 represents the most common sequence type in Asian countries [7] while ST398 is the dominant clone disseminating worldwide, especially in Europe and North America [3], and has been rarely identified in some Asian countries [34]. However, these strains are an infection-associated strain among pigs and humans in other Asian countries [7,34]. Although ST398 strains have been found from veterinarian [35] and swine farms (pigs and swine workers) [24] in Thailand, our report is the first to detect this strain from pork samples. ST9 and ST398 might be endemic in animal food production in the central region of Thailand.
ST9 has been rarely associated with human diseases [3]; however, a report from Thailand identified ST9 in 2.5% (7/276) of pig farm workers’ isolates [36]. In our study, ST5639, a novel single-locus variant of ST9, with a single base substitution in glpF was detected in pork from the market. This finding supports the notion that pigs or food animals are reservoirs for the emergence of new MRSA lineages or the evolution of existing clones [37]. Of note, one ST779 isolate from pork in the market (Table 2) was closely related to CA-MRSA or HA-MRSA observed among the population in Australia, UK, Ireland, and France [38,39]. We detected MRSA ST779 clone carrying SCCmec type IV (Table 2) distinct from a previous report by Kinnevey et al. [40,41] and Roberts et al. [42]. The former and the latter found ST779 carrying pseudo-element ΨSCCmec-SCC-SCCCRISPR and SCCmec type V, respectively. The emergence of human-related STs indicates that slaughter pigs and pork could become important reservoirs for MRSA and increase the potential risk of human infections. Thus, the MRSA lineage described in this study should be considered as a possible public health threat. These data suggest the need to investigate production practices in farms supplying pork products to markets.
A high prevalence of SCCmec IX and V among MRSA isolates from markets and slaughterhouses (Table 2 and Figure 1) indicates that this MRSA genotype is rapidly spreading among swine processing chain. ST9 isolates carry different types of SCCmec depending on the country [12,13,28,43]. Moreover, a large variety of SCCmec types have been found in CC9 strains; much more so than CC398 stains [8]. Therefore, the structures of the non-typeable SCCmec found in ST9 in this study need to be characterized by whole-genome sequencing in our future study.
We discovered a high diversity of MRSAs genotypes in markets. The major genotype profiles of MRSA isolates were different in each year and each source (slaughterhouses and markets). This analysis suggests that it may be linked to multiple sources of pork in each market and to a temporal shift in the epidemiology of genotype (STs and SCCmec type) in Thailand. Hence, further study is needed to monitor the evolution of these pathogens among livestock especially in pig farms and food production stages. Moreover, investigations of LA-MRSA compared to HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA in the same area should be conducted to elucidate the source of cross-contamination of MRSA among the human population, since certain clones may spread in this population.
Notably, oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive S. aureus (OS-MRSA) found in one pork-sample isolate belonged to ST9-SCCmec IX (Table 3 and Figure 1). All of LA-MRSA ST398 (Table 3 and Figure 1) displayed resistance to tetracycline similar to the previous reports [44]. This demonstrates that the LA-MRSA ST398 strain originated as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus in humans, then acquired methicillin and tetracycline resistance by antimicrobial selective pressure within the pig farms [45]. Thus, human exposure to LA-MRSA ST 398 might lead to the readaptation of this clone by reacquisition of human pathogenicity genes [45,46]. The MRSA ST9 strain showed more diverse antimicrobial resistance profiles than ST398 clones. Similar profiles to ST9 have been reported in central Thailand [24]. Previous reports have shown that LA-MRSA isolates were resistant to at least one agent of the fluoroquinolone class in Thailand [13,24,26,36,47,48,49], whereas only LA-MRSA ST9 in our study was associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. It is possible that several fluoroquinolones are available for treatment of animals in farms, and thus, their use may increase resistance among LA-MRSA. These results indicated that appropriate use of antimicrobials in farms is necessary to avoid emergence of high antimicrobial resistance rates of MRSA which can be sources of transmission to humans via food and other routes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design and Sample Collection

The cross-sectional study was performed in two settings of the food chain—slaughterhouses and markets in the central region of Thailand in 2017 and 2018—to determine the prevalence of MRSA.
A total of 204 nasal swab samples were collected from three slaughterhouses (A, B, and C) during 2017–2018 (Figure 2). In each year, 34 nasal swab samples were collected from each of the three slaughterhouses. All slaughterhouses were under the control of Department of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, but under different ownerships. Slaughterhouse A belonged to the town-municipal while slaughterhouses B and C belonged to private companies. Approximately 100–200 pigs were slaughtered per day. Slaughtering of animals was done according to common slaughtering practice, nasal swab samples were collected immediately after the scalding and dehairing and prior to washing the head with water. A cotton swab was inserted 2–7 cm (according to swine size) into both nostrils and gently rotated against the mucosal epithelium. Then, the cotton swab was inserted in the tube containing medium (Seed Swab γ No. 2 “Eiken”; Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) and the cap was tightly closed. All the swab samples were immediately stored in an ice box.
Approximately 50 g raw pork samples were purposely purchased from each butcher shop and collected in individual plastic bags. A total of 116 retailed pork samples were collected from 64 butcher shops in four fresh markets (D, E, F, and G in Figure 2) in the 2-year study. In 2017, a total of 57 pork samples were collected from 32 butcher shops, including market D (n = 6), market E (n = 37), market F (n = 6), and market G (n = 8). In 2018, a total of 59 pork samples were collected from 32 butcher shops, including market D (n = 7), market E (n = 38), market F (n = 6), and market G (n = 8). The unequal number of butcher shops for sample collection in each market was dependent on the capacity of the market.
Slaughterhouses and fresh markets were selected for convenience, based on the willingness of the producers to participate. All samples were kept individually in sterile bags, stored in an icebox, and transported to the laboratory within 6 h for further processing.
This study used meat and carcass from pigs in markets and slaughterhouses that had been legally registered. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Thammasat University (IACUC-TU) has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

4.2. Isolation and Identification of MRSA

All samples were inoculated into trypticase soy broth (TSB; Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) containing ceftizoxime (5 ug/mL), aztreonam (75 mg/mL), and 6.5% NaCl, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, enrichment cultures from individual samples were streaked on oxacillin-resistance screening agar (ORSA) supplemented with 2 µg/mL oxacillin (Oxoid) and incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. Up to three suspected staphylococcal colonies (mannitol-positive) were selected per sample from ORSA and sub-cultured on trypticase soy agar (TSA) (Oxoid). Colonies on TSA were primarily identified by Gram stain, catalase test, coagulase test, DNase test, and growth on mannitol salt egg-yolk agar (Figure S1). Presumptive MRSA isolates were further confirmed to species level by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene using primers Bact-rrs-F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and Bact-rrs-R (5′- TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGAC-3′) [50]. The PCR reaction mixture (total 20 µL) consisted of 1× Ex Taq buffer, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 0.25 µM of each primer, 0.5 U Taq polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., Kyoto, Japan), and 1 µL of DNA template. Thermal cycling was performed in a Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems Veriti™ Thermal Cycler, Foster City, CA, USA). Amplification conditions entailed the following: initial denaturation at 96 °C for 1 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 96 °C for 10 s, annealing at 55 °C for 10 s, DNA extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. This protocol was adapted from Neilan et al. (1997) [50]. After sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, contiguous sequences were analyzed by the BLAST search engine (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov accessed on 19 February 2021) and compared with those registered in the GenBank database.
Detection of the mecA gene was done by PCR using specific primers mecA-F (5′-AAAATCGATGGTAAAGGTTGGC-3′) and mecA-R (5′- AGTTCTGCAGTACCGGATTTGC-3′) for methicillin-resistance confirmation [51]. The PCR mixture was prepared in a total volume of 20 µl per reaction. The mixture contained 1x Green GoTaq reaction buffer, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM each of dNTP, 0.25 µM of each primer, 0.5 U GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and 1 µl of DNA template. The final volume was adjusted to 20 µl with sterile deionized water. The PCR conditions were the same as explained in the previous study [51]. Isolates with mecA were kept frozen at −80 °C until further examination.

4.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)

Isolates identified as MRSA were examined for susceptibility to antimicrobial agents using the disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA; Oxoid) following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines CLSI VET01 S5, 2018 for enrofloxacin [52]; and CLSI M100 S30, 2020 for all other antibiotics [53]. A total of 12 antimicrobial disks were used comprised of ampicillin (AMP, 10 µg), oxacillin (OXA, 1 µg), cefoxitin (FOX, 30 µg), chloramphenicol (CHL, 30 µg), clindamycin (CLI, 2 µg), erythromycin (ERY, 15 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), enrofloxacin (ENR, 5 µg), gentamicin (GEN, 10 µg), tetracycline (TET, 30 µg), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT, 25 µg), and vancomycin (VAN, 30 µg).

4.4. Molecular Typing of MRSA

SCCmec typing of MRSA was performed by PCR amplification of the mec (classes A–C) and ccr (types 1, 2, 3, and 5) regions as previously described [54]. The combinations of ccr types and classes of mec gene complexes were used to determine the SCCmec types of each isolate.
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed following the protocol described elsewhere [55]. The seven housekeeping genes (arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqi) were amplified by PCR. After agarose gel electrophoretic separation, PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT™ PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The concentration and quality of the purified PCR products were measured by Qubit 3 using Qubit dsDNA HS (High Sensitivity) Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The purified products were sequenced by ABI 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a BigDye ver. 3.1 Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sequencing data were analyzed using BioEdit version 7.0.9.1 [56]. The allele numbers and sequence type (ST) of each S. aureus isolate were obtained using MLST Databases S. aureus database (http://saureus.mlst.net accessed on 19 February 2021). Phylogenetic trees were constructed by Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 6.0 (www.megasoftware.net accessed on 19 February 2021). Isolates showing identical antimicrobial resistance phenotype and genotype obtained from same sample were considered as clonal.

4.5. Data Analysis

The SPSS software version 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. The chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests were carried out to examine the differences in the prevalence of MRSA and antimicrobial resistance profiles among the MRSA isolates. The p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

This is the first report investigating the distribution of MRSA in individual slaughter pigs and pork in Thailand. A high prevalence of SCCmec IX and V with high-level antimicrobial resistance among MRSA isolates from markets and slaughterhouses indicated that MRSA with this genotype was rapidly spreading in Thai swine-processing chains. For planning countermeasures, further research is required to understand the nationwide epidemiology of LA-MRSA among livestock, especially in pig farms and food production. In accordance with the information obtained from this study, reduced usage of antimicrobials in farms, prevention of MRSA contamination in animals along the entire pig production chain, and improved hygiene in food practices can be recommended to control the spread of MRSA and reduce the risk of MRSA to a minimum.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/2/206/s1, Table S1, Prevalence of MRSA among different sources; Table S2, Antimicrobial resistance patterns of MRSA isolates from pig and pork; Table S3, Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance of MRSA isolated in slaughterhouse and market located in Pathumthani province, Thailand in 2017 and 2018; Figure S1, Isolation and identification for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Author Contributions

W.T., R.C., K.C., W.P., A.I., Y.F. and N.Y. contributed to obtain data; W.T., T.F.K., C.N., O.S. and Y.S. contributed to analyze data; C.N., O.S. and Y.S. designed the study plan; W.T., T.F.K., C.N., O.S. and Y.S. drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the writing of the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a grant from Thammasat University Research Fund under the TU Research Scholar, Contract No. 8/2560, Thailand to O.S. This study was supported in part by a grant from the MEXT, for the Joint Research Program of the Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University to YS, and in part by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Number JP20wm0125008 to Y.S.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

W.T. was supported by the world-leading Innovation and Smart Education (WISE) Program (1801) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT). The authors also extend their sincerest gratitude to the Pathumthani Provincial Livestock Office, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, for their kind support during sample collection at slaughterhouses and markets.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Lencastre, H.; Oliveira, D.; Tomasz, A. Antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A paradigm of adaptive power. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007, 10, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Stefani, S.; Chung, D.R.; Lindsay, J.A.; Friedrich, A.W.; Kearns, A.M.; Westh, H.; MacKenzie, F.M. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Global epidemiology and harmonisation of typing methods. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 39, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aires-De-Sousa, M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among animals: Current overview. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Foster, T.J. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Current status and future prospects. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 007, 430–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Crombé, F.; Angeles Argudín, M.; Vanderhaeghen, W.; Hermans, K.; Haesebrouck, F.; Butaye, P. Transmission dynamics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Köck, R.; Becker, K.; Cookson, B.; Van Gemert-Pijnen, J.E.; Harbarth, S.; Kluytmans, J.; Mielke, M.; Peters, G.; Skov, R.L.; Struelens, M.J.; et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Burden of disease and control challenges in Europe. Eurosurveillance 2010, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chuang, Y.-Y.; Huang, Y.-C. Livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia: An emerging issue? Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2015, 45, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Butaye, P.; Argudín, M.A.; Smith, T.C. Livestock-associated MRSA and its current evolution. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2016, 3, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lo, Y.P.; Wan, M.T.; Chen, M.M.; Su, H.Y.; Lauderdale, T.L.; Chou, C.C. Molecular characterization and clonal genetic diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of pig origin in Taiwan. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 35, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cui, S.; Li, J.; Hu, C.; Jin, S.; Li, F.; Guo, Y.; Ran, L.; Ma, Y. Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from swine and workers in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 64, 680–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Guardabassi, L.; O’Donoghue, M.; Moodley, A.; Ho, J.; Boost, M. Novel lineage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Hong Kong. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1998–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Neela, V.K.; Zafrul, A.M.; Mariana, N.S.; Van Belkum, A.; Liew, Y.K.; Ghaznavi-Rad, E. Prevalence of ST9 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among pigs and pig handlers in Malaysia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 4138–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Larsen, J.; Imanishi, M.; Hinjoy, S.; Tharavichitkul, P.; Duangsong, K.; Davis, M.F.; Nelson, K.E.; Larsen, A.R.; Skov, R.L. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST9 in Pigs in Thailand. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lewis, H.C.; Mølbak, K.; Reese, C.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Selchau, M.; Sørum, M.; Skov, R.L. Pigs as source of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 infections in humans, Denmark. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. David, M.Z.; Daum, R.S. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 616–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Petinaki, E.; Spiliopoulou, I. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among companion and food-chain animals: Impact of human contacts. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Larsen, J.; Petersen, A.; Sørum, M.; Stegger, M.; Van Alphen, L.; Valentiner-Branth, P.; Knudsen, L.K.; Larsen, L.S.; Feingold, B.; Price, L.B.; et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 is an increasing cause of disease in people with no livestock contact in Denmark, 1999 to -2011. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20, 30021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Lekkerkerk, W.; Van De Sande-Bruinsma, N.; Van Der Sande, M.; Tjon-A-Tsien, A.; Groenheide, A.; Haenen, A.; Timen, A.; Van Den Broek, P.; Van Wamel, W.; De Neeling, A.; et al. Emergence of MRSA of unknown origin in the Netherlands. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 656–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Chon, J.; Sung, K.; Khan, S. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in food-producing and companion animals and food products. In Frontiers in Staphylococcus aureus; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. Assessment of the Public Health significance of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in animals and foods. EFSA J. 2009, 7, 1–73. [CrossRef]
  21. Larsen, J.; Stegger, M.; Andersen, P.S.; Petersen, A.; Larsen, A.R.; Westh, H.; Agersø, Y.; Fetsch, A.; Kraushaar, B.; Käsbohrer, A.; et al. Evidence for human adaptation and foodborne transmission of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Office of Agriculture Economics. Report of Important Agricultural Goods and Trend in 2016; Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives: Bangkok, Thailand, 2015. Available online: http://www.oae.go.th/view/1/Home/EN-US (accessed on 15 April 2020).
  23. Charoensook, R.; Knorr, C.; Brenig, B.; Gatphayak, K. Thai pigs and cattle production, genetic diversity of livestock and strategies for preserving animal genetic resources. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol. 2013, 7, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chanchaithong, P.; Perreten, V.; Am-In, N.; Lugsomya, K.; Tummaruk, P.; Prapasarakul, N. Molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from pigs and swine workers in Central Thailand. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 1382–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Anukool, U.; O’Neill, C.E.; Butr-Indr, B.; Hawkey, P.M.; Gaze, W.H.; Wellington, E.M. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs from Thailand. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 38, 86–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vestergaard, M.; Cavaco, L.M.; Sirichote, P.; Unahalekhakac, A.; Dangsakul, W.; Svendsen, C.A.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Butaye, P.R.; Golding, G. SCCmec type IX element in methicillin resistant Staphylococcusaureusspa type t337 (CC9) isolated from pigs and pork in Thailand. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ivbule, M.; Miklaševičs, E.; Čupāne, L.; Bērziņa, L.; Bālinš, A.; Valdovska, A. Presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in slaughterhouse environment, pigs, carcasses, and workers. J. Vet.-Res. 2017, 61, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yan, X.; Yu, X.; Tao, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, B.; Dong, R.; Xue, C.; Grundmann, H.; Zhang, J. Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from slaughter pigs in northeast China. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 304, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lassok, B.; Tenhagen, B.-A. From Pig to Pork: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the pork production chain. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 1095–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weese, J.; Avery, B.; Reid-Smith, R. Detection and quantification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones in retail meat products. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 51, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hanson, B.; Dressler, A.; Harper, A.; Scheibel, R.; Wardyn, S.; Roberts, L.; Kroeger, J.; Smith, T. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on retail meat in Iowa. J. Infect. Public Heal. 2011, 4, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lim, S.-K.; Nam, H.-M.; Park, H.-J.; Lee, H.-S.; Choi, M.-J.; Jung, S.-C.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, Y.-C.; Song, S.-W.; Wee, S.-H. Prevalence and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in raw meat in Korea. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 775–778. [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Donoghue, M.; Chan, M.; Ho, J.; Moodley, A.; Boost, M. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in meat from Hong Kong shops and markets. In Proceedings of the ASM Conference of Antimicrobial Resistance in Zoonotic Bacteria and Foodborne Pathogens in Animals, Humans and the Environment, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8–11 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-J. Detection and phylogeny of Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 in Taiwan. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Li, S.; Skov, R.L.; Han, X.; Larsen, A.R.; Larsen, J.; Sørum, M.; Wulf, M.; Voss, A.; Hiramatsu, K.; Ito, T. Novel types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements identified in Clonal Complex 398 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3046–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Patchanee, P.; Tadee, P.; Arjkumpa, O.; Love, D.; Chanachai, K.; Alter, T.; Hinjoy, S.; Tharavichitkul, P. Occurrence and characterization of livestock-associated methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusin pig industries of northern Thailand. J. Vet.-Sci. 2014, 15, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wagenaar, J.A.; Yue, H.; Pritchard, J.; Broekhuizen-Stins, M.; Huijsdens, X.; Mevius, D.J.; Bosch, T.; Van Duijkeren, E. Unexpected sequence types in livestock associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): MRSA ST9 and a single locus variant of ST9 in pig farming in China. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 139, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Coombs, G.; Pearson, J.; Christiansen, K.; Nimmo, G. Staphylococcus aureus Programme 2010 (SAP 2010). Community Survey. MRSA Epidemiology and Typing Report on Behalf of the Australian Group for Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR). The Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance: Australia, 2011. Available online: https://agargroup.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/FED-REPORT-SAP210-MRSA-FINAL-shrink.pdf (accessed on 4 January 2021).
  39. Monecke, S.; Coombs, G.; Shore, A.C.; Coleman, D.C.; Akpaka, P.; Borg, M.; Chow, H.; Ip, M.; Jatzwauk, L.; Jonas, D.; et al. A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kinnevey, P.M.; Shore, A.C.; Brennan, G.I.; Sullivan, D.J.; Ehricht, R.; Monecke, S.; Slickers, P.; Coleman, D.C. Emergence of sequence type 779 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harboring a novel pseudo staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec(SCCmec)-SCC-SCCCRISPR composite element in Irish hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kinnevey, P.M.; Shore, A.C.; Brennan, G.I.; Sullivan, D.J.; Ehricht, R.; Monecke, S.; Coleman, D.C. Extensive genetic diversity identified among sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered in Irish hospitals between 2000 and 2012. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1907–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Roberts, M.C.; Joshi, P.R.; Monecke, S.; Ehricht, R.; Müller, E.; Gawlik, D.; Paudel, S.; Acharya, M.; Bhattarai, S.; Pokharel, S.; et al. MRSA strains in Nepalese Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) and their environment. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Boost, M.V.; Wong, A.; Ho, J.; O’Donoghue, M. Isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from retail meats in Hong Kong. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2013, 10, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wendlandt, S.; Schwarz, S.; Silley, P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A food-borne pathogen? Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 4, 117–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Price, L.B.; Stegger, M.; Hasman, H.; Aziz, M.; Larsen, J.; Skytt Andersen, P.; Pearson, T.; Waters, A.E.; Foster, J.T.; Schupp, J.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: Host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. mBio 2012, 3, e00305-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Parisi, A.; Caruso, M.; Normanno, G.; Latorre, L.; Miccolupo, A.; Fraccalvieri, R.; Intini, F.; Manginelli, T.; Santagada, G. MRSA in swine, farmers and abattoir workers in Southern Italy. Food Microbiol. 2019, 82, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chanchaithong, P.; Perreten, V.; Schwendener, S.; Tribuddharat, C.; Chongthaleong, A.; Niyomtham, W.; Prapasarakul, N. Strain typing and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococcal species in dogs and people associated with dogs in Thailand. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 117, 572–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Lulitanond, A.; Ito, T.; Li, S.; Han, X.; Ma, X.X.; Engchanil, C.; Chanawong, A.; Wilailuckana, C.; Jiwakanon, N.; Hiramatsu, K. ST9 MRSA strains carrying a variant of type IX SCCmec identified in the Thai community. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Sinlapasorn, S.; Lulitanond, A.; Angkititrakul, S.; Chanawong, A.; Wilailuckana, C.; Tavichakorntrakool, R.; Chindawong, K.; Seelaget, C.; Krasaesom, M.; Chartchai, S.; et al. SCCmec IX in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from pigs and workers at pig farms in Khon Kaen, Thailand. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 1087–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Neilan, B.A.; Jacobs, D.; Del Dot, T.; Blackall, L.L.; Hawkins, P.R.; Cox, P.T.; Goodman, A.E. rRNA sequences and evolutionary relationships among toxic and nontoxic cyanobacteria of the genus microcystis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997, 47, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Murakami, K.; Minamide, W.; Wada, K.; Nakamura, E.; Teraoka, H.; Watanabe, S. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991, 29, 2240–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 5th ed.; CLSI standard VET01; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  53. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 30th ed.; CLSI supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kondo, Y.; Ito, T.; Ma, X.X.; Watanabe, S.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Etienne, J.; Hiramatsu, K. Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: Rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in Junkyard Regions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 51, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Enright, M.C.; Day, N.P.J.; Davies, C.E.; Peacock, S.J.; Spratt, B.G. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Window 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 10 00206 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between 67 MRSA strains isolated from nasal swab and pork samples based on the concatenated sequences of seven housekeeping enzyme genes’ loci (3186 bp). Boxes showing resistant, dark red; intermediate, ocher; and susceptible, green.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between 67 MRSA strains isolated from nasal swab and pork samples based on the concatenated sequences of seven housekeeping enzyme genes’ loci (3186 bp). Boxes showing resistant, dark red; intermediate, ocher; and susceptible, green.
Antibiotics 10 00206 g001
Antibiotics 10 00206 g002 550
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of the three selected slaughterhouses and the four fresh markets in the central region of Thailand.
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of the three selected slaughterhouses and the four fresh markets in the central region of Thailand.
Antibiotics 10 00206 g002
Table
Table 1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated in slaughterhouses and markets located in the central region of Thailand in 2017 and 2018.
Table 1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated in slaughterhouses and markets located in the central region of Thailand in 2017 and 2018.
Sample/PlaceNo. of MRSA-Positive Samples/Total No. (%)
20172018Total
Nasal swab
Slaughterhouse A2/34 (5.9)6/34 (17.6)8/68 (11.8)
Slaughterhouse B2/34 (5.9)1/34 (2.9)3/68 (4.4)
Slaughterhouse C0/340/340/68
Total (n)4/102 (3.9)7/102 (6.9)11/204 (5.4)
Pork
Market D0/61/7 (14.3)1/13 (7.7)
Market E22/37 (59.5) a14/38 (36.8)36/75 (48.0)
Market F3/6 (50.0)4/6 (66.7) a7/12 (58.3)
Market G3/8 (37.5)5/8 (62.5)8/16 (50.0)
Total (n)28/57 (49.1)24/59 (40.7)52/116(44.8)
a Two MRSA isolates were derived from one sample (there were two samples).
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type and ST type of MRSA isolated in slaughterhouses and markets located in the central region of Thailand in 2017 and 2018.
Table 2. Characteristics of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type and ST type of MRSA isolated in slaughterhouses and markets located in the central region of Thailand in 2017 and 2018.
Typing ProfilesSlaughterhouseMarketTotal
2017201820172018
SCCmec TypingSTABCABCDEFGDEFG
IX922051009131133545
V39800010001220003028
NT9000000020000002
IV779000000010000001
IX5639000000000001001
NT, nontypeable; ST, sequence type.
Table
Table 3. Association between antimicrobial resistance and genotype profile.
Table 3. Association between antimicrobial resistance and genotype profile.
Genotype ProfilesAntimicrobial Agents (No. of Isolates)
AMPOXAFOXCHLCLIERYCIPENRGENTETSXTVAN
ST9-SCCmec IX(n = 45)45444538 *3922 *45 *45 *42 *4416 *0
ST398-SCCmec V(n = 18)18181801812101800
ST9-SCCmec NT(n = 2)222222220200
ST779-SCCmec IV(n = 1)111100000100
ST5639-SCCmec IX(n = 1)111110111100
Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; OXA, oxacillin; FOX, cefoxitin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ENR, enrofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; TET, tetracycline; SXT, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim; VAN, vancomycin; resistant: only resistant isolates, non-resistant: including susceptible and intermediate isolates; NT, nontypeable; significant differences between ST9-SCCmec IX and all other genotype profiles; * p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanomsridachchai, W.; Changkaew, K.; Changkwanyeun, R.; Prapasawat, W.; Intarapuk, A.; Fukushima, Y.; Yamasamit, N.; Flav Kapalamula, T.; Nakajima, C.; Suthienkul, O.; et al. Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Slaughtered Pigs and Pork in the Central Region of Thailand. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020206

AMA Style

Tanomsridachchai W, Changkaew K, Changkwanyeun R, Prapasawat W, Intarapuk A, Fukushima Y, Yamasamit N, Flav Kapalamula T, Nakajima C, Suthienkul O, et al. Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Slaughtered Pigs and Pork in the Central Region of Thailand. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(2):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanomsridachchai, Wimonrat, Kanjana Changkaew, Ruchirada Changkwanyeun, Watsawan Prapasawat, Apiradee Intarapuk, Yukari Fukushima, Nattapong Yamasamit, Thoko Flav Kapalamula, Chie Nakajima, Orasa Suthienkul, and et al. 2021. "Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Slaughtered Pigs and Pork in the Central Region of Thailand" Antibiotics 10, no. 2: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020206

APA Style

Tanomsridachchai, W., Changkaew, K., Changkwanyeun, R., Prapasawat, W., Intarapuk, A., Fukushima, Y., Yamasamit, N., Flav Kapalamula, T., Nakajima, C., Suthienkul, O., & Suzuki, Y. (2021). Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Slaughtered Pigs and Pork in the Central Region of Thailand. Antibiotics, 10(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020206

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop