Next Article in Journal
Estimation of Total Hemoglobin (SpHb) from Facial Videos Using 3D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Regression
Previous Article in Journal
Wearable Personal Uroflowmeter for Measuring Urine Leakage in Women with Incontinence: Feasibility Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advance in Single-Molecule Fluorescent Biosensors for Tumor Biomarker Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Organic Afterglow Materials for Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy

1
The Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province for Basic and Clinical Application of Functional Nucleic Acids, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biosensors 2025, 15(8), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080484
Submission received: 27 May 2025 / Revised: 8 July 2025 / Accepted: 17 July 2025 / Published: 25 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Single-Molecule Biosensing: Recent Advances and Future Challenges)

Abstract

Organic afterglow nanoparticles (OANs) represent a unique class of optical materials capable of sustaining luminescence after excitation cessation. Owing to their exceptional design flexibility, tunable optical properties, and favorable biosafety profiles, OAN-based afterglow imaging has emerged as an advanced modality in tumor diagnosis and therapy. These nanostructures demonstrate significant potential in guiding precision surgical interventions and real-time monitoring of tumor treatment, including photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and immunotherapy. This review systematically analyzes and discusses the luminescence mechanisms of OANs under various excitation sources, with particular emphasis on recent developments in tumor detection and treatment. Additionally, we also discuss the current challenges and future perspectives of using these nanoparticles in this field.

1. Introduction

As a prominent bioimaging modality, optical imaging enables high-resolution visualization of both anatomical structures and physiological processes. Relative to traditional imaging techniques (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans), optical imaging exhibits higher sensitivity and specificity, lower invasiveness, and improved adaptability for both structural and functional in vivo analysis. This distinctive advantage significantly enhances the fidelity and productivity of experimental studies, pathological assessment, and treatment regimens [1]. However, traditional optical imaging methods such as fluorescence imaging rely on real-time excitation sources and are susceptible to interference from autofluorescence in biological tissues [2]. Although bioluminescence and chemiluminescence imaging eliminate the requirement for real-time excitation, they are still limited by enzyme-substrate kinetics [3]. To overcome these challenges, afterglow imaging, a unique luminescence phenomenon, enables the emission of luminescence persistently even after the excitation source is removed. This process is characterized by a half-life ranging from seconds to hours, and allows for recurrent excitation [4]. In contrast to phosphorescence (triplet-state emission) and delayed fluorescence (thermally activated reverse intersystem crossing), both involving short-lived exciton transitions, afterglow luminescence is sustained post-excitation through oxygen-mediated reactions that slowly decompose high-energy intermediates. Most importantly, because afterglow luminescence does not require real-time excitation, it presents several unique benefits, including significantly reduced autofluorescence background, enhanced imaging contrast with high signal-to-background ratios (SBR), and extended luminescence persistence for improved detection [5]. These features have made afterglow imaging a growing research focus in bioimaging and therapy fields (Table 1).
Given these remarkable advantages of afterglow imaging, the development of high-performance afterglow luminescent materials has become crucial for realizing its full biomedical potential. Afterglow luminescent materials are fundamentally categorized into inorganic and organic systems [6,7]. The field of inorganic afterglow materials originated with SrAl2O4 in the 19th century [8]. Through crystal engineering and doping strategies, researchers have developed transition metal (TM)- and lanthanide (Ln)-based nanomaterials with improved afterglow properties [9]. However, their biomedical applications are constrained by inherent drawbacks, including heavy metal ion leakage risks, non-biodegradability, structural rigidity, and energy-intensive synthesis, which pose significant biosafety concerns and may lead to inflammatory responses or organ accumulation, ultimately limiting clinical translation. Organic afterglow nanoparticles (OANs) have emerged as promising biomedical materials due to their tunable structures and excellent biocompatibility. A significant advancement occurred in 2015 when Pu developed the first MEHPPV (poly[2-methoxy-5-(2-ethylhexyloxy)-1,4-phenyl-enevinylene])-based afterglow system from poly (p-phenylenevinylene)s (PPVs) derivatives [10]. Subsequent studies expanded the scope to thiophene-functionalized polymers (PFODBT) [11] and small molecules like Schaap’s dioxetanes [12], enabling bioimaging applications. Recent progress includes porphyrin-based compounds (Ppa, Ce4) for diagnostics and therapy [12,13], as well as trianthracene derivatives—now leading candidates for deep-tissue imaging owing to their exceptional photon yield.
Table 1. Performance comparison of organic afterglow materials and traditional imaging agents.
Table 1. Performance comparison of organic afterglow materials and traditional imaging agents.
ExamplesReal-Time Excitation Lightλem [nm]BiocompatibilityBiological ApplicationsRef.
Organic Afterglow MaterialsMEHPPVNot Required595GoodLymph nodes, tumors and drug-induced hepatotoxicity imaging[7,10]
PFODBT690Real-time monitoring of photodynamic therapy, visualization of immune response and tumor imaging[14]
mMB710Early detection of inflammation, peritoneal metastatic tumors imaging and intraoperative navigation[15]
Ce4680Peritoneal metastatic tumors imaging and intraoperative navigation[13]
TAD625–650Colorectal cancer, glioblastoma and other tumors imaging, Granzyme B imaging and vascular lesion visualization[16]
Inorganic
Afterglow Materials
SrAl2O4Not Required520PoorThermoluminescence and photoconductivity research[8]
ZnSn2O4:Cr,Eu(ZSO)800Breast cancer imaging and tumor targeting capacity[9,17]
NaGd (Y) F4:Ln@NaGd (Y) F4(Ln = Er/Tm/Ho/Nd)1525, 1475, 1180, 1064Vascular and tumor imaging and real-time ureter tracking[9,18]
mSiO2@Zn0.6Ca0.4Ga2O4:Cr3+,Yb3+650–800Tumor imaging and dynamic monitoring[9,19]
NIR dyesICGRequired780–830GoodHepatic function assessment, vascular imaging and tumor surgical navigation[20,21]
BODIPYNIR-I(700–900), NIR-II(1000–1700)Photodynamic/photothermal therapy, deep tissue imaging and biosensors
IR-780780–820Tumor photothermal therapy, fluorescence-guided surgery and drug delivery monitoring
SOD9-TPP600–800Antioxidant therapy, mitochondrial protection and oxidative stress imaging
Quantum dotsPbSRequired800–1800PoorTumor imaging, biosensors and photodynamic therapy monitoring[22,23]
CdSe500–1000Fluorescence labeling, biological imaging and nucleic acid testing
InAs1000–3000Vascular and tumor imaging, biocompatible devices
Ag2Te1000–1300Tumor angiogenesis detection, drug delivery tracking, photothermal therapy monitoring and biosensors
Given these advantages, OANs are poised to play an indispensable role in advancing biomedical research [24]. In tumor diagnostics, OANs enable precise lesion localization with high sensitivity and outstanding signal-to-background ratio, allowing clear delineation of tumor infiltration margins and providing reliable clinical diagnostic information [16,25,26,27]. As for tumor therapy, OANs function not only as therapeutic agents and nanocarriers for chemotherapeutic drugs but also enable real-time monitoring of drug release kinetics through their afterglow signals, thereby facilitating dynamic treatment optimization [13,28,29]. Currently, researchers have systematically enhanced the afterglow performance of these materials via molecular engineering strategies, successfully developed multifunctional theranostic platforms that have achieved notable progress in in vivo imaging, intraoperative navigation, and personalized therapy. These advancements offer innovative solutions for precision oncology.
This review provides an overview of the luminescence mechanisms of OANs under different excitation conditions, including light, ultrasound, and X-ray, with a focus on their latest research progress and applications in tumor therapy (Scheme 1). Additionally, we will discuss the challenges these nanoparticles face in biomedical applications and explore future directions. The goal is to offer new perspectives for researchers, thereby advancing the application and development of afterglow luminescence technology in biomedicine.

2. Light-Induced Afterglow Imaging

Light serves as the primary excitation source for afterglow luminescent materials, and its mechanisms can be broadly categorized into physical and chemical mechanisms. In the physical mechanism, afterglow luminescent materials, upon the absorption of light energy, facilitate electronic transitions across various energy levels through the generation and stabilization of excitons, leading to afterglow luminescence. The observed phenomena arise from: (i) radiative relaxation from singlet excited states to ground states, coupled with (ii) dynamic equilibrium between triplet and singlet states established through competitive intersystem crossing (ISC) and reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) processes [30,31]. In the chemical mechanism, light energy is converted and sequestered within unstable cyclic peroxides as chemical energy, which is incrementally released as photons upon the decomposition of these peroxides [10,32,33,34]. Thus far, these dual mechanisms have been extensively utilized in the domain of afterglow luminescence.
In recent years, the domain of OANs has seen remarkable progress. The following discussion will meticulously elucidate the performance characteristics and photoluminescence mechanisms of three distinct categories of organic nanoparticles.

2.1. Semiconducting Polymers (SPs)

Poly (p-phenylenevinylene)s (PPVs), a member of the semiconducting polymers (SPs) family, is an organic nanoparticle distinguished by its unique optical properties. The core structure of PPVs, which confers these special characteristics, is based on the p-phenylenevinylene motif. As early as 2015, a derivative of PPVs was first reported as a material exhibiting afterglow properties [10].
Miao et al. [7] have identified that PPVs, when adorned with electron-donating alkoxy substituents like BOPPV, MDMOPPV, and MEHPPV, manifest observable afterglow luminescence. The underlying mechanism involves the photogeneration of singlet oxygen (1O2) upon irradiation, which engages in a π2–π2 cycloaddition with the vinylene bond (C=C) of the PPVs, yielding a highly reactive PPV-dioxetane intermediate. This intermediate, being inherently unstable, undergoes spontaneous degradation into a PPV-aldehyde, in the process emitting photons. Photocatalytic oxidation of PPV-aldehyde ultimately generates PPV-carboxyl as the terminal reaction product (Figure 1a).
Concurrently, our team conducted studies on organic semiconductors incorporating thiophene groups. We developed PFODBT@CPPO nanoparticles via nanoprecipitation, exhibiting 80–100 nm diameter and buffer stability. Optimization of CPPO doping and Pluronic-F127 surfactant enhanced NIR afterglow intensity 8-fold over PFODBT alone. PFODBT functioned as: (1) photosensitizer generating 1O2 via ISC; (2) substrate forming thiophene-dioxetane intermediate; and (3) chemically initiated electron exchange luminescence (CIEEL)-based energy relay for NIR emission. CPPO amplified signals through 1O2-triggered dioxetanedione formation, creating a dual cyclic loop where 1O2 activated both components, intermediate cleavage excited more PFODBT, and PFODBT regenerated 1O2 via ISC. This synergy achieved 8-min afterglow duration, 7.5-mm tissue penetration, and 16× higher SBR than fluorescence imaging (Figure 2) [14].

2.2. Heterocyclic Compounds

Among various OANs, heterocyclic structures—particularly methylene blue and porphyrin derivatives—have garnered significant research interest due to their exceptional photoactive characteristics.
Zhu et al. [15] pioneered the investigation of methylene blue’s (mMB) persistent luminescence behavior. Their findings revealed that mMB serves as a multifunctional component in the afterglow system, acting simultaneously as a luminescence trigger, reaction medium, and energy transfer mediator, thereby amplifying near-infrared chemiluminescence. The proposed photophysical process can be described as follows: When irradiated, mMB generates abundant 1O2 along with trace amounts of superoxide radicals (O2•−). These reactive oxygen species facilitate the oxidative cleavage of the dual vinylene linkages in the aromatic side chain, producing an mMB-dioxetane transition state. This transient high-energy species rapidly undergoes decomposition, accompanied by light emission (Figure 1b).
In addition to mMB, porphyrins (such as Ce4, Ce6, and Ppa), with their highly conjugated systems and unique photoelectric properties, have found widespread application in clinical practice. Taking Ce4 as an example [13], Ce4 absorbs energy and transfers it to oxygen, producing 1O2. The generated 1O2 subsequently oxidizes the vinylene bond (C=C) through a π22 cycloaddition, producing a Ce4-dioxetane intermediate. This intermediate then decomposes to generate the observed afterglow luminescence.

2.3. Trianthracene Derivatives (TADs)

To address the limited triplet energy that constrains 1O2 production and subsequent afterglow emission, we developed an innovative trianthracene derivative (TAD) through rational molecular engineering [16]. Our team strategically incorporated alkoxy substituents at both ortho- and bay-positions of the anthracene core to augment electron donation capability. The TAD’s unique afterglow behavior arises from the cooperative interaction between two distinct photodynamic processes: The first involves electron transfer reactions that generate O2•− and TAD radical cations (TAD•+), while the second proceeds through energy transfer to produce 1O2 alongside ground-state TAD molecules. Importantly, the reactive species created via the electron transfer pathway synergistically enhance the efficiency of the energy transfer mechanism, forming a self-reinforcing cycle that dramatically improves intermediate production and afterglow performance (Figure 1c). Experimental evaluations demonstrated the TAD’s remarkable afterglow intensity, surpassing MEHPPV by approximately 500-fold, while also exhibiting superior tissue penetration characteristics. These exceptional properties establish TADs as highly promising candidates for next-generation afterglow applications.

3. Ultrasound-Induced Afterglow Imaging

The implementation of light-induced luminescence for deep-tissue imaging faces significant limitations due to photon scattering and reabsorption effects in biological media. Ultrasound, as a noninvasive mechanical energy source with excellent deep tissue penetration capability, can effectively transfer its energy to luminescent nanoparticles through a well-characterized mechanoluminescence mechanism, thereby generating a persistent afterglow emission. This method fundamentally overcomes the depth limitations associated with traditional optical excitation methods while maintaining excellent spatiotemporal resolution [35,36]. Therefore, ultrasound-induced afterglow luminescence shows great potential in promoting precision medicine in the diagnostic monitoring of visceral organs.

3.1. Sonoafterglow Nanoparticles (SNAPs)

The ultrasound-induced afterglow luminescence system is composed of three critical elements: a sonosensitizer, a luminescent substrate, and a stabilizer. Upon ultrasonic activation, the sonosensitizer produces 1O2 through an energy transfer process. This reactive oxygen species (ROS) oxidizes the luminescent substrate, generating a high-energy intermediate that undergoes controlled decomposition, thereby releasing stored chemical energy as delayed luminescence. The stabilizer ensures nanoparticle structural integrity and promotes dispersion and stability in physiological environments. Through systematic screening of sonosensitizers and substrates, compositional optimization, and incorporation of biocompatible stabilizing agents, Xu et al. [37] established a robust platform, named sonoafterglow nanoparticles (SNAPs), for efficient afterglow imaging.
The fundamental process underlying ultrasound-induced afterglow luminescence in SNAPs is clearly delineated (Figure 3a). Initially, the sonosensitizer absorbs acoustic energy, generating 1O2 via physicochemical transduction. This 1O2 then catalyzes the conversion of the substrate into an energy-rich intermediate that emits photons upon decomposition. Notably, the emitted photons can be reabsorbed by the sonosensitizer and re-emitted at longer wavelengths through energy transfer, resulting in signal amplification. This mechanism enhances both luminescence intensity and persistence. Optimization of the sonosensitizer-to-substrate ratio and ultrasound parameters enabled imaging at tissue depths up to 4 cm, surpassing conventional photoafterglow limitations. The system’s high sensitivity and deep-tissue penetration establish its potential for high-contrast, real-time imaging in biomedical diagnostics.

3.2. Molecules Luminescence Through Two-Step Intraparticle Energy Conversion

Differing from above mentioned ultrasound-induced luminescence system, our team have pioneered organic molecules leveraging a piezoelectric effect to achieve ultrasound-induced afterglow luminescence [38]. Employing a trianthracene derivative (TD) as both the luminescent molecule and piezoelectric component, the approach utilizes a nano-precipitation method to encapsulate TD into a hydrophobic core (TD NPs), forming spherical nanoparticles with an average diameter of 30–40 nm.
When subjected to ultrasound irradiation, TD NPs exhibit piezoelectric polarization that drives catalytic generation of reactive oxygen species (1O2 and •OH) through piezocatalytic processes. These generated ROS then react with TD NPs to form metastable dioxetane-based high-energy intermediates. The subsequent decomposition of these intermediates results in efficient energy release through photon emission (Figure 3b). The developed system demonstrates a remarkable 2389.6-fold enhancement in ultrasound-triggered luminescence intensity compared to conventional water-based sonoluminescence. This significant increase in luminescence intensity directly contributes to its superior imaging performance, achieving a spatial resolution of 1.46 mm and a tissue penetration depth of 2.2 cm. Moreover, leveraging this enhanced luminescence capability, the platform is engineered to enable dual-mode imaging, seamlessly integrating both immediate and delayed ultrasound-induced luminescence imaging modalities, thereby providing more comprehensive and detailed information for various applications.

4. X-Ray-Induced Afterglow Imaging

X-ray, a type of electromagnetic radiation, consist of high-energy photons with extremely short wavelengths, allowing them to penetrate atomic structures. This unique property enables X-ray to effectively deliver energy to deep tissue areas, enhancing energy storage for afterglow luminescence [39]. Based on the unique tunability and structural flexibility of OANs, X-ray-induced afterglow luminescence characteristics offer an innovative technological pathway for achieving precise radiotherapy.
Xu et al. [40] have proposed a cascade X-ray energy conversion system for X-ray induced afterglow luminescence, utilizing a radioabsorber (CzTPN) that attenuates X-ray through photoelectric and Compton effects. The X-ray energy undergoes conversion to radioluminescent emissions, which subsequently activate the radiosensitizer (NIR775) to produce 1O2. The 1O2 can effectively diffuse to the radio-afterglow substrates, where it oxidizes them into an active dioxetane intermediate. After the cessation of X-ray exposure, these intermediates gradually decompose, emitting radio-afterglow. The emitted photons can also be transferred back to NIR775, resulting in a red-shifted radio-afterglow from the radiosensitizer (Figure 4a).
Moreover, the team also reported a type of OANs [4] that are composed of an organic luminophore (IDPAsu), a tumor-targeting moiety, and an enzyme-cleavable peptide. These OANs demonstrate a radio-afterglow signal enhancement exceeding 25-fold relative to traditional inorganic phosphors, while simultaneously generating a significantly higher yield of 1O2. The mechanism begins with X-rays interacting with the atoms in IDPAx through photoelectric and Compton effects, leading to the production of high-energy hot electrons. These electrons then interact with nearby atoms, generating low-energy secondary electrons and electron-hole pairs. Under the influence of iodine and sulfur, a substantial number of electrons are transferred into triplet excited states. During the excitonic transition to ground state, they transfer their energy to surrounding oxygen molecules, producing 1O2. The in situ-generated 1O2 subsequently undergoes a cycloaddition reaction with IDPAx, forming a dioxetane intermediate. Finally, this intermediate decomposes into the corresponding induced IDPAx, releasing photons and resulting in afterglow emission (Figure 4b).

5. Organic Afterglow Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy

The distinctive benefits of OANs have led to their broad adoption across various biomedical research applications in recent years. Numerous studies have reported the development of innovative nanoplatforms based on these nanoparticles, which not only exhibit exceptional optical properties but also facilitate precise tumor-targeted imaging and real-time monitoring of therapeutic responses. These capabilities hold significant promise for advancing early cancer diagnosis and enabling more personalized treatment strategies.

5.1. Afterglow Imaging Guiding Surgery

Accurate intraoperative identification of a tumor’s location and its invasive margins is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and prognosis. By interacting with specific biomarkers in tumor cells, OANs generate bright islands at the tumor site, thereby enabling real-time imaging to provide precise guidance during tumor surgery.
Chen et al. [13] reported the development of an organic afterglow nanoparticle (NPs-Ce4) for in vivo tumor imaging. Following intravenous administration, the light-induced NPs-Ce6 enabled continuous monitoring of distinct afterglow signals in the abdominal region, with a notably high SBR (Figure 5a). Additionally, histopathological analysis confirmed that, guided by the afterglow signal, surgical resection of tumor tissues was performed with enhanced precision, particularly in the detection of small tumors, where the technique demonstrated significant efficacy in identifying tumor lesions measuring just 3 mm3 in volume (Figure 5b–d).
A high signal-to-background ratio combined with high sensitivity proves crucial for cancer surgery guidance by allowing visualization of minute and residual tumor lesions [41]. To achieve enhanced afterglow luminescence signals, Duan et al. [29] developed organic nanoparticles (Ppa-FFGYSA) that form β-sheet structures via supramolecular self-assembly, remarkably amplifying both photoacoustic and afterglow luminescence signals. These nanoparticles leverage dual targeting capability combining passive the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) accumulation with EphA2 receptor-specific binding to generate robust photoacoustic signals at tumor sites. Moreover, afterglow luminescence imaging, free from tissue autofluorescence interference, enables clear detection of submillimeter tumor nodules in the complex peritoneal environment, demonstrating excellent spatiotemporal controllability and imaging performance.

5.2. Afterglow Imaging Monitoring Photodynamic Therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) represents a spatially targeted anticancer strategy where the interaction between a light-induced photosensitizer and tissue oxygen generates cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, enabling precise tumor eradication with minimal invasiveness [42]. Compared to traditional fluorescence imaging, afterglow luminescence imaging can provide real-time information with a high SBR, thereby offering robust support for precise therapy. Therefore, the development of an imaging system that integrates afterglow luminescence imaging with PDT has become a research hotspot in this field [43,44].
In addressing the challenges of hypoxic conditions within solid tumors that limit the efficacy of PDT by impeding the generation of ROS, we proposed an innovative fractionated PDT protocol [28]. Our team developed an innovative TAD-based photosensitizer engineered to maintain ROS production persistently following light withdrawal, thereby inducing an afterglow photodynamic effect. The protocol involved administering light irradiation through intermittent illumination phases with recovery periods for oxygen replenishment, while employing afterglow imaging to track continuous ROS generation. Furthermore, we optimized the therapeutic outcomes of PDT by meticulously controlling the intervals between irradiation sessions, the dosage of illumination, along with the irradiation cycle duration (Figure 6). This strategy extended the duration of therapeutic effects and reduced damage to normal tissues, demonstrating significant promise for clinical application.

5.3. Afterglow Imaging Monitoring Photothermal Therapy

Photothermal therapy (PTT) employs photoconversion materials that effectively transform optical energy into thermal energy, thereby annihilating tumor cells with abbreviated treatment durations and minimal side effects. To minimize thermal damage to surrounding healthy tissues, a plethora of OANs with high photothermal conversion efficiencies have been reported. These OANs harness afterglow imaging to monitor the photothermal temperature of tumors, thereby guiding PTT. However, the majority of these nanoparticles predominantly absorb light in the NIR, which is characterized by limited tissue penetration capabilities [45].
Qu et al. [46] engineered a dual-functional polymeric nanosystem (APPN) incorporating three key components: a tumor-targeted afterglow probe (PPV-PEG-cRGD), an afterglow activator (NCBS), and a NIR-II photothermal converter (PBBTOT) (Figure 7a). The APPN nanoparticles leverage 808 nm laser pre-irradiation to activate NCBS, which produces 1O2 that interacts with PPV’s vinylene groups to yield dioxetane species. These high-energy compounds gradually emit photons during decomposition, producing near-infrared afterglow through fluorescence resonance energy transfer-mediated energy transfer for accurate tumor visualization. Simultaneously, APPN achieves efficient photothermal conversion (80.82%) under 1064 nm laser irradiation, facilitating deep-tissue PTT with excellent thermal stability. This multifunctional platform enables precise afterglow imaging and NIR-II PTT, specifically eliminating remaining malignant cells to prevent tumor regrowth (Figure 7b). APPN’s distinctive characteristics allow for high-contrast imaging and effective PTT, presenting a viable strategy for adjuvant treatment following breast-conserving surgery.

5.4. Afterglow Imaging Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy, a strategy that harnesses the body’s immune system to combat tumor cells, has become increasingly effective against recurrent and refractory tumors [47]. However, due to individual patient variability and the toxicity associated with drug overdose, the efficacy of immunotherapy has not yet reached an optimal level [48]. By developing specific afterglow imaging techniques targeting immune response-related biomarkers [37], it enables the visual monitoring of immune cell activity throughout the immunotherapy process.
To develop afterglow nanoprobes with high signal intensity, enhanced tissue penetration, and specific biomarker responsiveness, we developed a nanosensing platform incorporating three key components: (1) the enzyme-responsive peptide IEFD, (2) luminescent TAD nanoparticles, and (3) the dark quencher BHQ-3 (Figure 8a). When exposed to granzyme B, the specific proteolytic cleavage of the IEFD linker disrupts the ARET process between TAD-NPs and BHQ-3, leading to significant enhancement of the afterglow emission signal (Figure 8b,c) [16]. Since granzyme B is released by CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells during immune responses, monitoring granzyme B expression levels provides an indirect measure of immune activation following immunotherapy.
Parallel to these investigations, our team assessed immune activation in mice subjected to combined radiotherapy (RT) and PD-L1 blockade by quantitatively monitoring granzyme B expression (Figure 9a). Experimental data revealed markedly enhanced afterglow emission intensities in tumors from the PD-L1 inhibitor plus RT cohort (Figure 9b,c), demonstrating the TAD-BHQ nanosensor’s capability for dynamic assessment and therapeutic evaluation of chemo-radiotherapy and immune checkpoint modulation regimens.
The aforementioned approach, which combines multiple drugs or therapies for synergistic or combination treatment of tumors, is known as combination therapy. Its advantages include reducing drug resistance, inducing apoptosis in cancer cells, and achieving high efficacy, making it a cornerstone of cancer treatment [49]. Pei et al. [50] developed a multifunctional nanotherapy and diagnostic platform for tumor combination treatment by self-assembling Fe-Ce6 nanoparticles (Figure 10a). The designed nanoparticles exhibit two distinct therapeutic mechanisms: they efficiently transform light energy into thermal energy for PTT, while their glutathione (GSH)-sensitive components enable controlled Ce6 release to initiate both photodynamic effects and sustained afterglow emission (Figure 10b,c).

6. Conclusions and Outlook

This review offers a critical evaluation of emerging trends and transformative innovations in organic afterglow luminescence research. The article begins by elucidating the mechanisms of afterglow luminescence under various excitation conditions, including light, ultrasound, and X-ray. It then offers detailed examples of several types of organic afterglow materials, such as semiconducting polymers, heterocyclic compounds, and trianthracene derivatives. These materials have attracted significant attention in recent years due to their exceptional biocompatibility and versatile design flexibility. Lastly, the review discusses the cutting-edge applications of organic afterglow nanoparticles in tumor therapy, underscoring their immense potential and promising future in the biomedical field.
Despite the remarkable potential of ultrasound- and X-ray-induced afterglow luminescence systems, current research is confronted with three significant hurdles. (1) The short emission wavelengths of existing nanoparticles impede deep-tissue transmission, restricting high-contrast imaging and precise diagnostic and therapeutic applications; (2) Safety remains a critical concern as the unclear metabolic pathways, unassessed toxicity, and potential immune responses of afterglow materials have stalled clinical trials; (3) Afterglow luminescence is closely associated with oxygen concentration, and hypoxic tumor microenvironments, characterized by low oxygen levels, can quench afterglow signals. In hypoxic conditions, energy transfer and electron transfer mechanisms that rely on oxygen molecules for afterglow luminescence are disrupted, reducing imaging effectiveness.
To address these challenges, future research should focus on three key strategies: (1) Developing systems with extended emission wavelengths to enhance deep-tissue imaging and the capabilities for diagnosis and treatment; (2) Creating safe afterglow materials and establishing comprehensive evaluation systems to promote clinical translation; (3) Incorporating oxygen-supplying molecules via nanocarriers, such as co-delivering nanocarriers loaded with oxygen-releasing compounds alongside afterglow nanoparticles to the tumor site, where the compounds can gradually release oxygen, increase local oxygen concentration, and potentially enhance afterglow luminescence performance in hypoxic tumors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W.; validation, D.X.; writing—original draft preparation, X.C. and B.L.; writing—review and editing, X.C. and B.Y.; supervision, Y.W. and D.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Maldiney, T.; Bessière, A. The in Vivo Activation of Persistent Nanophosphors for Optical Imaging of Vascularization, Tumours and Grafted Cells. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, H.; Kim, Y. Near-Infrared (NIR) Fluorescence-Emitting Small Organic Molecules for Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 8957–9008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vacher, M.; Fdez Galván, I. Chemi- and Bioluminescence of Cyclic Peroxides. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 6927–6974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, J.; Su, L. Molecular Radio Afterglow Probes for Cancer Radiodynamic Theranostics. Nat. Mater. 2023, 22, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.; Teng, L. “Four-In-One” Design of a Hemicyanine-Based Modular Scaffold for High-Contrast Activatable Molecular Afterglow Imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 5134–5144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, X.; Waterhouse, G.I.N. Recent Advances in the Design of Afterglow Materials: Mechanisms, Structural Regulation Strategies and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 8005–8058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miao, Q.; Xie, C. Molecular Afterglow Imaging with Bright, Biodegradable Polymer Nanoparticles. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 1102–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aoki, Y.; Takeuchi, N. A New Long Phosphorescent Phosphor with High Brightness, SrAl2O4:Eu2+,Dy3+. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1996, 143, 2670–2673. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao, L.; Liu, Y. Modulation of Near-Infrared Afterglow Luminescence in Inorganic Nanomaterials for Biological Applications. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2419349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Palner, M.; Pu, K. Semiconducting Polymer Nanoparticles with Persistent Near-Infrared Luminescence for in Vivo Optical Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11477–11480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Z.; Zhou, Y. Efficient Electroconversion of Carbon Dioxide to Formate by a Reconstructed Amino-functionalized Indium–Organic Framework Electrocatalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 19107–19112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, H.; Tessarolo, J. Light-Powered Dissipative Assembly of Diazocine Coordination Cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 3099–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, W.; Zhang, Y. Near-Infrared Afterglow Luminescence of Chlorin Nanoparticles for Ultrasensitive In Vivo Imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 6719–6726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Y.; Song, G. Cyclic Amplification of the Afterglow Luminescent Nanoreporter Enables the Prediction of Anti-cancer Efficiency. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 19779–19789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhu, J.; Chen, W. A Self-Sustaining Near-Infrared Afterglow Chemiluminophore for High-Contrast Activatable Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202318545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Guo, J. Ultrabright and Ultrafast Afterglow Imaging in Vivo via Nanoparticles Made of Trianthracene Derivatives. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2025, 9, 656–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, J.; Shi, J. Five-Nanometer ZnSn2O4:Cr,Eu Ultra-Small Nanoparticles as New Near Infrared-Emitting Persistent Luminescent Nanoprobes for Cellular and Deep Tissue Imaging at 800 nm. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 8631–8638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pei, P.; Chen, Y. X-ray-activated persistent luminescence nanomaterials for NIR-II imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, Y.; Hu, J. Multiple emission bands NIR-persistent luminescence mSiO2@Zn0.6Ca0.4Ga2O4:Cr3+,Yb3+ nanoparticles for biological applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, L.; Zhang, Q. Biomedical applications of NIR-II organic small molecule fluorescent probes in different organs. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 519, 216122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, Y.; Mao, Z. Recent advances in near infrared (NIR) electrochemiluminescence luminophores. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2024, 35, 109622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, Y.; Xin, K. Recent Progress and Challenges of Infrared Quantum Dots. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2025, 68, 4383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shen, W.-S. Near-Infrared Quantum Dots for Electroluminescence: Balancing Performance and Sustainability. Laser Photonics Rev. 2025, 19, 2401947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Z.; Liu, H. Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Organic Long-Persistent Luminophores Light up Biomedicine: From Two-Component Separated Nano-Systems to Integrated Uni-Luminophores. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 11207–11227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zeng, W.; Wu, L. An Activatable Afterglow/MRI Bimodal Nanoprobe with Fast Response to H2S for in Vivo Imaging of Acute Hepatitis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202111759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lyu, Y.; Cui, D. Near-infrared Afterglow Semiconducting Nano-polycomplexes for the Multiplex Differentiation of Cancer Exosomes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4983–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, L.; Zhao, M. A Highly Bright Near-Infrared Afterglow Luminophore for Activatable Ultrasensitive In Vivo Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202313117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.; Shen, H. Enhancing Fractionated Cancer Therapy: A Triple-Anthracene Photosensitizer Unleashes Long-Persistent Photodynamic and Luminous Efficacy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 6252–6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duan, X.; Zhang, G. Activatable Persistent Luminescence from Porphyrin Derivatives and Supramolecular Probes with Imaging-Modality Transformable Characteristics for Improved Biological Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202116174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, L.; Chen, J. Controlling Persistent Luminescence in Nanocrystalline Phosphors. Nat. Mater. 2023, 22, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Berezin, M.Y.; Achilefu, S. Fluorescence Lifetime Measurements and Biological Imaging. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2641–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Green, O.; Gnaim, S. Near-Infrared Dioxetane Luminophores with Direct Chemiluminescence Emission Mode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13243–13248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Haris, U.; Kagalwala, H.N. Seeking Illumination: The Path to Chemiluminescent 1,2-Dioxetanes for Quantitative Measurements and in Vivo Imaging. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 2844–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jiang, Y.; Huang, J. A Generic Approach towards Afterglow Luminescent Nanoparticles for Ultrasensitive in Vivo Imaging. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Memari, E.; Khan, D. Focused Ultrasound-Assisted Delivery of Immunomodulating Agents in Brain Cancer. J. Control. Release 2024, 366, 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, H.; Zheng, Y. Ultrasound-Based Micro-/Nanosystems for Biomedical Applications. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 8307–8472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, C.; Huang, J. Nanoparticles with Ultrasound-Induced Afterglow Luminescence for Tumour-Specific Theranostics. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 6, 298–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Yi, Z. In Vivo Ultrasound-Induced Luminescence Molecular Imaging. Nat. Photonics 2024, 18, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wei, Y.; Wang, J. X-Ray/γ-Ray/Ultrasound-Activated Persistent Luminescence Phosphors for Deep Tissue Bioimaging and Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 56519–56544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, C.; Qin, X. A Cascade X-Ray Energy Converting Approach toward Radio-Afterglow Cancer Theranostics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2025, 20, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vahrmeijer, A.L.; Hutteman, M. Image-Guided Cancer Surgery Using near-Infrared Fluorescence. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 10, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wu, W.; Mao, D. A Highly Efficient and Photostable Photosensitizer with Near-infrared Aggregation-induced Emission for Image-guided Photodynamic Anticancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Juengpanich, S.; Li, S. Pre-Activated Nanoparticles with Persistent Luminescence for Deep Tumor Photodynamic Therapy in Gallbladder Cancer. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zheng, X.; Wu, W. Organic Nanoparticles with Persistent Luminescence for in Vivo Afterglow Imaging-guided Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 6911–6916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, Y.; Li, J. Dual-Peak Absorbing Semiconducting Copolymer Nanoparticles for First and Second near-Infrared Window Photothermal Therapy: A Comparative Study. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Qu, R.; He, D. Afterglow/Photothermal Bifunctional Polymeric Nanoparticles for Precise Postbreast-Conserving Surgery Adjuvant Therapy and Early Recurrence Theranostic. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 4216–4225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhong, Y.; Ma, Z. In Vivo Molecular Imaging for Immunotherapy Using Ultra-Bright near-Infrared-IIb Rare-Earth Nanoparticles. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 1322–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Friedman, A.A.; Letai, A. Precision Medicine for Cancer with Next-Generation Functional Diagnostics. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bayat Mokhtari, R.; Homayouni, T.S. Combination Therapy in Combating Cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 38022–38043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pei, Q.; Zhou, S. Ferric Ion-driven Chlorin E6 Nanoparticles: Simple and Effective Multimodal Theranostics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2304205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Scheme illustrating excitation sources and biomedical applications of organic afterglow nanoparticles.
Scheme 1. Scheme illustrating excitation sources and biomedical applications of organic afterglow nanoparticles.
Biosensors 15 00484 sch001
Figure 1. Light-induced luminescence mechanisms of different organic nanoparticles. (a) Luminescent mechanism of PPV-based semiconducting polymers (R1/R2: alkyl chains). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [7]. Copyright 2017 Springer Nature America, Inc. (b) Chemiluminescence pathway of mMB system (m/z data presented as mean ± SD, n = 3), mMB*, excited mMB. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [15]. Copyright 2024 Wiley-VCH GmbH. (c) Molecular design, synthesis, and principle of TAD-NPs afterglow system. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Figure 1. Light-induced luminescence mechanisms of different organic nanoparticles. (a) Luminescent mechanism of PPV-based semiconducting polymers (R1/R2: alkyl chains). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [7]. Copyright 2017 Springer Nature America, Inc. (b) Chemiluminescence pathway of mMB system (m/z data presented as mean ± SD, n = 3), mMB*, excited mMB. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [15]. Copyright 2024 Wiley-VCH GmbH. (c) Molecular design, synthesis, and principle of TAD-NPs afterglow system. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Biosensors 15 00484 g001
Figure 2. Afterglow luminescence mechanism studies. Investigation of the delayed emission mechanism in PFODBT@CPPO nanoparticles. PFODBT*, excited PFODBT. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [14]. Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 2. Afterglow luminescence mechanism studies. Investigation of the delayed emission mechanism in PFODBT@CPPO nanoparticles. PFODBT*, excited PFODBT. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [14]. Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Biosensors 15 00484 g002
Figure 3. Mechanism of ultrasound activated luminescence. (a) Sonochemical activation pathway: Ultrasound-triggered 1O2 generation initiates dioxetane formation from substrates, followed by gradual decomposition yielding persistent emission. Energy recycling occurs through sensitizer re-excitation with spectral red-shift. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [37]. Copyright 2022 Springer Nature. (b) Piezoluminescent process in TD nanoparticles: Mechanically-induced photon emission (hν) via piezoelectric transduction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright 2024 Nature Photonics.
Figure 3. Mechanism of ultrasound activated luminescence. (a) Sonochemical activation pathway: Ultrasound-triggered 1O2 generation initiates dioxetane formation from substrates, followed by gradual decomposition yielding persistent emission. Energy recycling occurs through sensitizer re-excitation with spectral red-shift. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [37]. Copyright 2022 Springer Nature. (b) Piezoluminescent process in TD nanoparticles: Mechanically-induced photon emission (hν) via piezoelectric transduction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright 2024 Nature Photonics.
Biosensors 15 00484 g003
Figure 4. Mechanism of X-ray-activated luminescence. (a) X-ray energy conversion pathway in RANP: The radioabsorber CzTPN transforms X-ray energy into visible luminescence through photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering. This scintillation energy is subsequently relayed to NIR775, enabling near-infrared emission and 1O2 production via ISC/RISC processes. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [40]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature. (b) Radio-afterglow generation process: Initial X-ray absorption by IDPAX creates high-energy photoelectrons that undergo sequential energy loss, forming thermalized charge carriers. I/S-rich environments promote triplet exciton formation, whose decay energizes molecular oxygen to yield 1O2. This reactive species initiates dioxetane formation and subsequent photon release through cyclic peroxide breakdown. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [4]. Copyright 2023 Springer Nature.
Figure 4. Mechanism of X-ray-activated luminescence. (a) X-ray energy conversion pathway in RANP: The radioabsorber CzTPN transforms X-ray energy into visible luminescence through photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering. This scintillation energy is subsequently relayed to NIR775, enabling near-infrared emission and 1O2 production via ISC/RISC processes. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [40]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature. (b) Radio-afterglow generation process: Initial X-ray absorption by IDPAX creates high-energy photoelectrons that undergo sequential energy loss, forming thermalized charge carriers. I/S-rich environments promote triplet exciton formation, whose decay energizes molecular oxygen to yield 1O2. This reactive species initiates dioxetane formation and subsequent photon release through cyclic peroxide breakdown. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [4]. Copyright 2023 Springer Nature.
Biosensors 15 00484 g004
Figure 5. Afterglow imaging of tiny metastatic tumors in vivo together with the histological analysis of the tumors extracted. (a) Temporal afterglow imaging series following intravenous administration of NPs-Ce4 in murine models, with quantified luminescence intensities (ROI analysis, n = 3). (b) Dual-mode visualization combining afterglow and bright-field imaging post NPs-Ce4 injection (200 μg/mL, 200 μL dose). (c) Comparative ex vivo imaging of resected tumors showing bright-field (upper) and afterglow (lower) modalities (5 mm scale). (d) Histopathological correlation via H&E-stained tumor sections (400 μm scale) corresponding to (c). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [13]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. Afterglow imaging of tiny metastatic tumors in vivo together with the histological analysis of the tumors extracted. (a) Temporal afterglow imaging series following intravenous administration of NPs-Ce4 in murine models, with quantified luminescence intensities (ROI analysis, n = 3). (b) Dual-mode visualization combining afterglow and bright-field imaging post NPs-Ce4 injection (200 μg/mL, 200 μL dose). (c) Comparative ex vivo imaging of resected tumors showing bright-field (upper) and afterglow (lower) modalities (5 mm scale). (d) Histopathological correlation via H&E-stained tumor sections (400 μm scale) corresponding to (c). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [13]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 15 00484 g005
Figure 6. Illustration showing the working principle of TAD-NP-mediated divided-dose photodynamic therapy in tumor cells. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [28]. Copyright 2024 American Chemical Society.
Figure 6. Illustration showing the working principle of TAD-NP-mediated divided-dose photodynamic therapy in tumor cells. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [28]. Copyright 2024 American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 15 00484 g006
Figure 7. (a) Structural formulas of PPV-PEG-cRGD and PBBTOT compounds and preparation scheme for APPN assembly. (b) Procedural overview showing intraoperative afterglow imaging during BCS and subsequent NIR-II photothermal treatment guided by persistent luminescence. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. (a) Structural formulas of PPV-PEG-cRGD and PBBTOT compounds and preparation scheme for APPN assembly. (b) Procedural overview showing intraoperative afterglow imaging during BCS and subsequent NIR-II photothermal treatment guided by persistent luminescence. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Biosensors 15 00484 g007
Figure 8. Afterglow imaging of immune responses after chemotherapy in vivo. (a) Working mechanism of TAD-BHQ nanocomplex for granzyme B-responsive afterglow visualization. (b,c) Afterglow monitoring in subcutaneous CT-26 tumors after treatment regimens: PBS control, triple-dose NLG919/BMS-1/BEC, single-dose BEC, followed by TAD-NP administration. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Figure 8. Afterglow imaging of immune responses after chemotherapy in vivo. (a) Working mechanism of TAD-BHQ nanocomplex for granzyme B-responsive afterglow visualization. (b,c) Afterglow monitoring in subcutaneous CT-26 tumors after treatment regimens: PBS control, triple-dose NLG919/BMS-1/BEC, single-dose BEC, followed by TAD-NP administration. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Biosensors 15 00484 g008
Figure 9. In vivo monitoring of combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy via afterglow luminescence CT-26 tumor models were subjected to four treatment regimens: (i) PBS control, (ii) anti-PD-L1 monotherapy, (iii) radiotherapy (RT) alone, and (iv) combination anti-PD-L1 + RT. After 72 h, all groups received TAD-NP administration for subsequent afterglow visualization. (a) Conceptual diagram of TAD-BHQ nanoprobe operation for granzyme B detection post-treatment, including dosing timeline. (b) Time-dependent afterglow signals comparing PBS control versus combination therapy groups. (c) Quantitative afterglow intensity measurements from tumor regions shown in panel (b). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Figure 9. In vivo monitoring of combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy via afterglow luminescence CT-26 tumor models were subjected to four treatment regimens: (i) PBS control, (ii) anti-PD-L1 monotherapy, (iii) radiotherapy (RT) alone, and (iv) combination anti-PD-L1 + RT. After 72 h, all groups received TAD-NP administration for subsequent afterglow visualization. (a) Conceptual diagram of TAD-BHQ nanoprobe operation for granzyme B detection post-treatment, including dosing timeline. (b) Time-dependent afterglow signals comparing PBS control versus combination therapy groups. (c) Quantitative afterglow intensity measurements from tumor regions shown in panel (b). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Biosensors 15 00484 g009
Figure 10. The diagram shows (a) the process of preparing Fe-Ce6 NPs. (b) The GSH-responsive theranostic application. (c) The antitumor effect achieved by combining PTT and PDT. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 10. The diagram shows (a) the process of preparing Fe-Ce6 NPs. (b) The GSH-responsive theranostic application. (c) The antitumor effect achieved by combining PTT and PDT. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Biosensors 15 00484 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Li, B.; Yin, B.; Xu, D.; Wang, Y. Organic Afterglow Materials for Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy. Biosensors 2025, 15, 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080484

AMA Style

Chen X, Li B, Yin B, Xu D, Wang Y. Organic Afterglow Materials for Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy. Biosensors. 2025; 15(8):484. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xiayi, Bin Li, Baoli Yin, Dong Xu, and Youjuan Wang. 2025. "Organic Afterglow Materials for Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy" Biosensors 15, no. 8: 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080484

APA Style

Chen, X., Li, B., Yin, B., Xu, D., & Wang, Y. (2025). Organic Afterglow Materials for Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy. Biosensors, 15(8), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15080484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop