Next Article in Journal
Smart and Multifunctional Nanomaterials and Applications for Food Safety
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection of Reverse Transcriptase LAMP-Amplified Nucleic Acid from Oropharyngeal Viral Swab Samples Using Biotinylated DNA Probes through a Lateral Flow Assay
Previous Article in Journal
Current Status and Emerging Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnostics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in Point-of-Care Testing of microRNAs Based on Portable Instruments and Visual Detection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/bios13100927
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Active Core-Shell Ag NPs@Carbon Dots with Enzyme-Mimicking Activities for Label-Free Measurement Cholesterol

by
Jian Ju
1,2,*,
Lin Li
1,3,
Bei Li
3,4,
Sagar Regmi
5,
Tingting Wang
1,
Jiao Xu
1,
Chaojie Li
1 and
Shixing Tang
1,6,*
1
Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou 325001, China
2
Oujiang Lab, Wenzhou 325001, China
3
School of Ophthalmology & Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China
4
The State Key Lab of Applied Optics, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
5
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
6
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(10), 927; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13100927
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 27 September 2023 / Accepted: 3 October 2023 / Published: 16 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advance in Biosensors and Its Applications in Point-of-Care Molecular Diagnostics (POC-MDx))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Serological-sensitive testing of cholesterol holds significant value in the fields of healthcare and clinical diagnosis. This study reports on the preparation of peroxidase-mimicking nanozymes through the wrapping of N, S-doped carbon dots (DCDs) on the surface of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs@DCD). The shell–core structure of Ag NPs@DCD displays peroxidase-mimicking capability, with the potential to catalyze inactive Raman probe molecules into the Raman reporters. Furthermore, a “shell-isolated nanoparticles-enhanced Raman spectroscopy” structure exhibited an enhanced Raman signal of reporter molecules. Ag NPs@DCD were utilized to create a label-free SERS sensing system for high-performance detection of cholesterol in serum samples. These results demonstrate the potential of the novel nanozyme-based SERS approach for clinical diagnosis.

1. Introduction

Cholesterol (C27H46O) is a waxy substance that serves multiple functions such as building healthy cells as well as regulating cell membrane permeability and fluidity biomarkers of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and ischemic stroke (IS) [1,2]. In addition to that, some epidemiologic studies suggested a correlation between the risks of several malignancies and serum cholesterol levels [3,4]. It is generally accepted that the optimum concentration of cholesterol is in the range of 3 to 6 mM in human serum [5]. The abnormal cholesterol level often serves as a warning for several diseases such as hyperthyroidism, malnutrition anemia and low lipoprotein, etc. [6,7,8]. Therefore, the accurate monitoring of blood cholesterol in the body is important for health-related problems as well as clinical diagnosis.
At present, there are many methods to monitor the quantification of cholesterol, such as electrochemical [9,10,11], piezoelectric [12], colorimetric [13,14], fluorometric [11], surface plasmon resonance [15] and enzymes methods [10,16,17]. However, these technologies have some shortcomings, such as poor stability of electrochemical electrodes [18], susceptibility of colorimetric methods to color interference [19], photobleaching and easy quenching of fluorescent light-emitting groups [20]. Recently, a cholesterol biosensor based on Surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) has been developed due to its rapid analysis, low small sample requirement, non-destructive properties, and high sensitivity. Wu et al. fabricated a shell–core nanoparticles with an embedded standard used as the novel SERS substant for detection of cholesterol in solution as well as inside the live cell at a single-cellular level [21]. He et al. prepared a kind of Ag NPs@MOF-based SERS-active sensor for high-performance detection of cholesterol in blood samples [22]. In this study, the Ag nanoparticles were grown on the surface of MIL-101 (Fe) to create the hybrid nanomaterial of AgNPs@MOF. This material is capable of oxidizing leucomalachite green (LMG) into the Raman-active malachite green (MG) in the presence of H2O2 from cholesterol oxidase (ChOx) during the oxidation of cholesterol. Interestingly, such a novel hybrid SERS biosensor can achieve high sensitivity and provide a more user-friendly strategy by reducing the operation steps to immobilize enzymes on the substrate surface. These articles propose novel strategies for developing efficient composite materials possessing both enzymatic activity and SERS-active properties, which could promote the use of SERS biosensors in vitro diagnostics application.
The sliver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) possess extraordinary SERS activities, which present great localized electromagnetic (EM) field enhancement [23]. The EM phenomenon is linked to the “hot spots” created via Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) on the surface of metals, such as gold (Au) or silver (Ag). The Raman signal experiences significant amplification when once the analyte molecules come close to the “hot spot” field [24]. Currently, researchers have reported abound of materials loaded with Ag NPs to obtain homogeneous structures, such as metallic oxide [25], MOF [22], carbon materials [26,27], polymer [28,29] and silica [30,31], which are conductive to improving the stability of Ag NPs and generating a large number of “hot spots”. Among the above-mentioned SERS-active substrates, the carbon-based materials are of particular interest as the Raman signals of target molecules can be enhanced through both chemical enhancement (CE) and EM by combining with plasmonic nanoparticles [32]. Zheng et al. [33] demonstrated that Graphene/Ag nanomaterials can generate numerous “hot spots” for the development of effective SERS biosensors. Meanwhile, Shi et al. reported on a two-steps approach to synthesize Graphene/Ag@ molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) hybrid nanomaterial with outstanding SERS activity [32]. Furthermore, Ag NPs are receiving considerable interest as nanozymes due to their excellent stability, customizable catalytic performance, affordability and ease of preparation. With these advantages, silver nanozymes are being increasingly used in biosensing [34,35] and biomedicine [36]. However, creating ideal nanozymes that exhibit not only good catalytic activity but also excellent sensitivity for use in SERS sensor remains a challenge.
In our study, we proposed a TMB-AgNPs@carbon dot-based SERS sensor probe for the first time. The substrate was prepared through a green and low-temperature technique using N, S-doped carbon dot (DCD) and Ag nanoparticles. The resulting structure features Ag NPs as the core and DCD as the shell, enabling a “shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy” (SHINERS) effect. SHINERS technology was first reported by Prof. Tian’s group [37]. The method utilized shell-isolated nanoparticles to prevent direct contact between the core of the nanoparticle and the target molecules, resulting in enhanced Raman signals. Currently, SHINERS technology is being applied in various fields such as single crystal interfaces, food safety, cultural heritage, biological imaging, and photothermal therapy [38]. In addition, this substrate has a higher capacity to enrich molecules in its “hot spot”. In particular, Ag NPs@DCD exhibited a peroxidase-like activity through the increased oxidation of chromogenic 3, 3′, 5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) with H2O2. Utilizing oxTMB as Raman signal molecules, the TMB-Ag NPs@DCD probe effectively detected serum cholesterol concentration with speed and precision, as shown in Scheme 1.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical Reagents

Citric acid (CA), thiourea (TU), 3, 3′, 5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), ethanol, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), Triton X-100 and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (HH), silver nitrate, cholesterol oxidase (ChOx), uric acid (UA), cholesterol esterase (ChE), ascorbic acid (AA), urea, MgCl2 and dopamine (DA) were purchased from Aladdin Shanghai, China. NaAc-HAc buffer (0.2 M, pH 4.26), and PBS buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.0) were also used. Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA) provided Rhodamine 6G (R6G) and Urea. Rabbit serum was provided by the Animal Experiment Centre of Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

2.2. Instruments

The morphology and size images of N, S-doped carbon dot (DCD), Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD were analyzed using a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM, FEI Talos F200S, Hillsbor, OR, USA). Raman spectra were measured using a Raman spectrometer with a 785 nm laser excitation wavelength (Renishaw, London, UK). A UV-vis spectrometer (TU-1901, Beijing, China) was employed to perform the UV-Vis absorption spectrum readings. Absorbance was quantified using an Epoch Microplate Spectrophotometer (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT, USA, country).

2.3. Preparation of N, S-Doped Carbon Dot (DCD)

DCDs were synthesized via the hydrothermal method using a TU and CA mass ratio of 2:1. The resulting powder was dissolved in DMF solution and heated to 160 °C in an autoclave for 6 h [39]. After cooling to the room temperature, the products were collected via the centrifugation process (10,000 rpm for 10 min). Next, 5 mL of the obtained supernatant obtained was added dropwise to 40 mL of NaOH solution (50 mg/mL), and DCD (2.0 mg/mL) was then stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C.

2.4. Details the Preparation of Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD

Ag NPs were prepared using the method reported by Liu’s lab [40]. First, 1 mL of 10 mg mL−1AgNO3 was dropped into water (44 mL), and then 5 mL solution containing Triton X-100 (35 μL), HH (15 mM) and NaOH (30 mM) was added immediately. The mixture was then sonicated for 30 min at room temperature, and the resulting Ag NPs were purified via centrifugation and washed twice for 10 min at 10,000 rpm.
Following our previous work [41], Ag NPs@DCD were synthesized with a similar approach that was applied to pure Ag NPs. Briefly, 4 mL of DCD (10 ug/mL) was added and mixed before the introduction of Triton X-100 (35 μL), HH (15 mM) and NaOH (30 mM) and subjecting it to an ultrasonic treatment for 30 min. Finally, we washed the Ag NPs@DCD with centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 10 min) to remove unused DCD. The concentration of the reserve solution was adjusted to 2 mg mL−1.

2.5. Evaluation of Enzyme-Activity of AgNPs@DCD Nanocomposites

The mimetic peroxidase activity of Ag NPs@DCD was assessed by utilizing TMB and H2O2 as substrates. In the reactive system, various concentration of H2O2 and TMB were mixed to a HAc-NaAc buffer (0.2 M, pH 4.26) containing 0.25 mg mL−1 of Ag NPs@DCD solution. After incubation for 10 min, the absorbance of oxTMB at 652 nm was recorded on an Epoch Microplate Spectrophotometer.

2.6. Examination of SERS Activity of Prepared Ag NPs@DCD as SERS Substrate

The SERS activity of pure Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD was investigated using R6G as a Raman reporter. Specifically, 50 μL each of Ag NPs or Ag NPs@DCD (2 mg/mL) was added into R6G (100 μL, 10−6 M) and incubated for 5 min. Then, the SERS measurement was performed at a 785 excitation wavelength with an integration time of 10 s.

2.7. SERS Detection of Cholesterol Utilizing TMB-Ag NPs@DCD System

In this experiment, 0.1 M of cholesterol stock solution was prepared using an ethanol solution in a water bath at 60 °C. The above solution was then diluted to series concentration (2 to 200 μM) with a PBS solution. For a typical assay, a mixture of 10 μL of cholesterol sample and 50 μL of ChOx (70 UN mL−1) were incubated in PBS buffer (140 μL) at 37 °C for 30 min. Then, an aqueous solution of Ag NPs@DCD (0.25 mg mL−1) was mixed with 2 mM of TMB, and the resulting mixture was diluted with HAc-NaAc buffer (0.2 M, pH 4.26) to a final volume of 1 mL. The system was incubated for additional 30 min at 37 °C, and the Raman intensity at 1605 cm−1 was measured to detect cholesterol. The procedure of the selectivity experiment to detect cholesterol was the same as described above. The excitation wavelength for the Raman measurement was 785 nm with a power density of 1.2 W/mm2 and an exposure time of 10 s.

2.8. Testing of Serum Samples

To evaluate the application of the novel TMB-Ag NPs@DCD SERS biosensor, rabbit blood was chosen as a complex sample for detecting total cholesterol. To produce the free cholesterol, 50-fold serum samples (with PBS buffer) were mixed with 100 μL of 10 U mL−1 cholesterol esterase and 50 μL of 70 UN mL−1 cholesterol oxidase and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C [42]. Each sample was then mixed with the same concentration as mentioned before for Ag NPs@DCD, H2O2 and TMB. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and then employed for the SERS detection.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of DCD, Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD

The morphologies of the DCD, Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD were analyzed using TEM, as illustrated in Figure 1. DCD has a narrow size distribution of approximately 11 nm, as shown in Figure 1A. TEM image of Ag NPs with a relatively broad size distribution, and an apparent process of gradual fusion of small particle size silver nanoparticles into large particle size was observed in Figure 1B due to the weak structure control agent of TX-100 surfactant. However, in the presence of DCD, Figure 1C,D show that the capped Ag NPs obtained with DCD have a well-defined morphology with an average diameter of about 87 nm, as judged from the image analysis of 100 individual particles. These TEM images prove that DCD is coated on the surface of silver nanoparticles and has a significant control effect on morphology and structure of Ag NPs. High crystallinity, the fast Fourier transform (FFT) shows lattice spacing of 0.22 nm and 0.235 nm, which corresponds to the (1120) lattice fringes of graphitic carbon, and the (1 1 1) planes of Ag NP, respectively. This result indicated that DCD was successfully wrapped on the Ag NPs surface. The nanocrystals of the AgNPs@DCD were also analyzed via Scanning TEM (STEM) coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Figure 2 displays an overlay of DCD and silver EDX maps, which demonstrates a distinct separation of the C, N, and S elements from carbon dots that are homogeneously distributed on the silver element, thus confirming the shell–core structure.
The absorption spectra (UV–visible) of the aqueous dispersion of the DCD, Ag NPs, and Ag NPs@DCD are displayed in Figure 3A. A characteristic absorption peak attributed to the π-π* transitions in the core and the surface states is evident at 230 nm and 332 nm [32]. The pure Ag NPs synthesized via ultrasonication exhibit a typical peak at 400 nm (curve red), and then as expected, the peak of Ag NPs capped with DCD (curve blue) is observed at 420 nm, indicating an approximately 20 nm redshift. It is noted that encapsulating the Ag NPs with DCD causes the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) band to gradually shift towards longer wavelengths and become broader. This can be attributed to the formation of nanoparticle composites with more uniform and improved particle sizes, as well as the efficient plasmon-induced interfacial charge transfer (CT) processes (Ag to DCD CT transition) in AgNPs@DCD [43]. Based on the HRTEM and UV results, it can be concluded that Ag NP@DCD comprising a core–shell structure has been successfully prepared [35].

3.2. Examination of Raman Performance of Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD

Figure 4 depicts the SERS spectra analysis comparing Ag NPs (black curve) to Ag NP@DCD (red curve), utilizing R6G as the Raman reporter. An array of peaks has been identified, specifically strong peaks at 613 cm−1 and 776 cm−1 that correspond to the C—C—C ring in-plane bending and C-H out-of-plane bending, respectively. Peaks located at around 1311/1365 cm−1 are attributed to C—C/C—N stretching, and a strong peak at 1510 cm−1 was assigned to the aromatic C—C stretching. It is worth mentioning that Ag NPs@DCD demonstrate enhanced SERS performance compared to the pure Ag NPs, suggesting the formation of a “shell isolated nanoparticle” structure when the surface of Ag NPs is coated with DCD. The thickness of the layer of DCD placed between silver nanoparticles is advantageous for creating more Raman-enhanced “hot spots”. We estimated that the enhancement factor (EF) of Ag NPs@DCD SERS signals relative to the ordinary Raman measurement (EFSERS/Raman; R6G) is about 1.6 × 106.

3.3. Enzyme-Mimicking Activities of Ag NPs@DCD

Ag NPs@DCD were assessed for their enzyme-like capabilities in a system with H2O2 and TMB using UV-Vis spectroscopy. The visible region did not showcase any distinct UV-vis peaks for the TMB mixed H2O2 solution, as displayed in Figure 3B. Nevertheless, the introduction of Ag NPs@DCD into the catalytic system above demonstrated an obvious absorption at around 652 nm, which was designated to the oxidized TMB. Figure 3B inset provides the relevant digital photographs of the solution. These results verified the peroxidase-mimicking activity of Ag NPs@DCD hybrids in the current study.
To evaluate and understand the catalytic activity of the Ag NPs@DCD, we utilized the steady-state kinetic parameters of the reaction, focusing on the concentration series of H2O2 and TMB. Figure 5A,C displayed the typical Michaelis–Menten curves for TMB and H2O2 were obtained by plotting the initial reaction velocity for the substrate concentrations. The Michaelis–Menten equation was applied as follows:
V0 = Vmax [S]/Km + [S]
The V0, Vmax, Km, and [S] represent the initial reaction rate and the maximal reaction velocity. These kinetic parameters of Ag NPs@DCD were analyzed with respect to HRP. The Km value explains the intrinsic properties of a particular enzyme/substrate, where a lower Km value indicates a stronger affinity of the enzyme for the substrate. The obtained kinetic parameters of Ag NPs@DCD were compared to those of HRP. The Km value of Ag NPs@DCD for H2O2 (1.137 mM) was 3.2 times lower than that of HRP (3.700 mM) [44]; this suggests that Ag NPs@DCD possess a higher affinity for H2O2. Ag NPs@DCD showed 1.4 times lower activity towards TMB (0.307 mM) than HRP (0.434 mM) [44]. This indicates that Ag NPs@DCD have a stronger affinity for H2O2 than HRP. It is worth noting that Figure 5B,D illustrate a typical ping-pong mechanism with parallel slopes across varying substrate concentrations, resembling that of HRP. The aforementioned results indicate that Ag NPs@DCD showed enhanced catalytic performance as a peroxidase-mimicking agent during the reaction with H2O2 and TMB.

3.4. Conditions for the Experiments

The amount of Ag NPs@DCD utilized, and the concentration of H2O2 and TMB are vital factors that determine the catalytic performance. The optimization of measuring conditions was conducted by measuring the absorption of oxTMB at 652 nm. According to previous research [35], the catalytic of the enzyme is significantly affected by the temperature during incubation. If the temperature is too low or high, the effectiveness of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction decreases. Hence, we opted for an incubation temperature of 37 °C for this experiment. As depicted in Figure 5A, the absorbance intensity of the reaction solution in the Ag NPs@DCD and TMB reaction increases with the addition of H2O2. In this reaction system, Ag NPs@DCD can effectively catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 into the ·OH radicals, leading to the conversion of oxTMB by TMB. However, the absorbance of oxidized TMB ceases to increase at 50 μM. Therefore, we concluded that 50 μM H2O2 is the optimal reaction concentration for this study. Figure 6A shows an increasing absorbance at 652 nm as the amount of Ag NPs@DCD nanocomposites (ranging from 0 to 2 mg mL−1) increase in the presence of TMB (10 mM) and H2O2 (50 μM). Considering the catalytic efficiency and sensor cost, it is advisable to employ 0.25 mg mL−1 of Ag NPs@DCD subsequent experiment. The influence of TMB concentration was also studied within a concentration range of 0.25 to 5 mM. Figure 6B illustrates the present data showing that maximum absorbance is obtained at 2 mM TMB using Ag NPs@DCD (0.25 mg mL−1) and H2O2 (50 μM). Thus, 0.25 mg mL−1 and 2 mM TMB were used as the optimized experimental conditions for this work.

3.5. Analytical Performance of TMB-Ag NPs@DCD SERS Sensing for Cholesterol Detection

The proposed sensing platform was used to measure various concentrations of cholesterol according to defined experimental parameters. As depicted in Figure 7A, the Raman peak at 1605 cm−1 exhibited changes upon the addition of different cholesterol concentrations, establishing a dynamic response range for measuring cholesterol concentration between 2.0 and 200 μM. Additionally, Figure 7B shows the concentration-dependency response, which is explained with the following linear fitting equation: I(1605 cm−1) = 15,169.74 × Log Ccholesterol − 44.25 (R2 = 0.998). The calculated detection of limit for this sensing system is 0.8 μM. Table 1 presents a summary of the detection capabilities of various sensing techniques for cholesterol measurement. The results suggest that the method reported in this study showed better performance than some other reported sensing systems in terms of both detection limit and linear range.

3.6. Selectivity of the TMB-Ag NPs@DCD SERS Sensing System for Cholesterol Detection

To test the selectivity of the proposed sensor for cholesterol detection under the defined conditions, we measured the responses of some possible coexisting substances in serum samples, including 200 μM of UA, Uera, MgCl2, AA, Glu and DA. Figure 8A,B demonstrate that the Raman intensity of oxTMB remained unaffected by all coexisting substances, except for cholesterol. With the DCD-coated surface of the plasmonic Ag NPs, the stability of the nanoparticle is greatly improved, which can effectively reduce the adsorption of biomolecules on the Ag NPs surface within the complex system and ensure the enzyme-like catalytic efficacy of silver nanoparticles, and at the same time, it shows that Ag NPs@DCD can also play a role as a Raman substrate in Raman signal enhancement. Therefore, the designed SHINERS nanostructure in this work is expected to be widely used in the field of enzyme immunoassay and molecular diagnosis in complex biological samples.

3.7. Measurement of Cholesterol in Serum Sample

The TMB-Ag NPs@DCD SERS sensing system was utilized to measure cholesterol in the serum samples. In this study, we employed the standard addition method to detect cholesterol under physiological conditions. The data are presented in Table 2. Using the standard calibration curve depicted in Figure 7B and the customary regression equation, we calculated the cholesterol concentration in the serum samples. This sensing system displays excellent cholesterol measurement sensitivity.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the Ag NPs@DCD nanocomposites were prepared using a straightforward ultrasound strategy to form a shell-isolated nanoparticle structure for SERS substrate. The resulting Ag NPs@DCD exhibit oxidase-like behavior and have the ability to facilitate the oxidation of TMB with H2O2. The as-designed TMB-Ag NPs@DCD SERS sensing system for sensitive cholesterol detection ranging from 2.0 to 50 μΜ, with a low LOD of 0.8 μΜ. The novel biosensor is a label-free assay that does not require a complex labeling procedure. Moreover, TMB-Ag NPs@DCD SERS was shown to be an effective SERS biosensor for detecting cholesterol in rabbit blood samples. At present, the key to clinical diagnosis of this sensor is the stability of the enzyme, and the efficiency of enzyme catalysis directly determines the detection performance of this novel sensor. Nevertheless, the advantages of the present sensor, such as low cost, fast response, high detection sensitivity, and good selectivity, demonstrate its potential application in point-of-care testing (POCT) diagnostics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J., B.L. and S.T.; validation, J.J., L.L. and S.T.; experimental operation, J.J., L.L., T.W., J.X. and C.L.; writing—original draft, J.J., L.L., S.R. and T.W.; investigation, J.J., L.L. and S.T.; formal analysis, J.J., L.L., T.W. and S.R.; supervision S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No. LTGY23B050002; the Wenzhou Public Welfare Basic Research Program (grant No. S20220021) and start-up grant from the Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (WIUCASQD2021027, WIUCASQD2020018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

  1. Aspelund, T.; Gudnason, V. Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol. Nature 2020, 582, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lim, G.B. Inclusion of remnant cholesterol improves risk prediction for ischaemic heart disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022, 19, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Allott, E.H.; Howard, L.E.; Cooperberg, M.R.; Kane, C.J.; Aronson, W.J.; Terris, M.K.; Amling, C.L.; Freedland, S.J. Serum lipid profile and risk of prostate cancer recurrence: Results from the SEARCH database. Cancer Epidem. Biomar. 2014, 23, 2349–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Silvente-Poirot, S.; Poirot, M. Cholesterol and cancer, in the balance. Science 2014, 343, 1445–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Brahim, S.; Narinesingh, D.; Guiseppi-Elie, A. Amperometric determination of cholesterol in serum using a biosensor of cholesterol oxidase contained within a polypyrrole–hydrogel membrane. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 448, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sigal, G.A.; Tavoni, T.M.; Silva, B.M.; Khalil-Filho, R.; Brandão, L.G.; Baracat, E.C.; Maranhão, R.C. Subclinical hyperthyroidism: Status of the cholesterol transfers to HDL and other parameters related to lipoprotein metabolism in patients submitted to thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haba, T.; Sakai, Y.; Koizumi, J.; Miyamoto, S.; Mabuchi, H.; Takeda, R. A case of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia associated with hyperthyroidism: Effects of triiodothyronine on low-density lipoprotein receptor and cholesterol synthesis. Metabolism 1983, 32, 1129–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hofmaenner, D.A.; Kleyman, A.; Press, A.; Bauer, M.; Singer, M. The many roles of cholesterol in sepsis: A review. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 205, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, J.; Ye, Z.; Fan, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, B. A highly sensitive biosensor based on Au NPs/rGO-PAMAM-Fc nanomaterials for detection of cholesterol. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xia, T.; Liu, G.; Wang, J.; Hou, S.; Hou, S. MXene-based enzymatic sensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of cholesterol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 183, 113243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaur, G.; Tomar, M.; Gupta, V. Development of a microfluidic electrochemical biosensor: Prospect for point-of-care cholesterol monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 261, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Srisawasdi, P.; Jearanaikoon, P.; Wetprasit, N.; Sriwanthana, B.; Kroll, M.H.; Lolekha, P.H. Application of Streptomyces and Brevibacterium cholesterol oxidase for total serum cholesterol assay by the enzymatic kinetic method. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2006, 372, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, D.D.; Duong, P.K.; Cheah, R.H.; Liu, X.Y.; Wong, J.R.; Wang, W.J.; Guan, S.T.T.; Zheng, X.T.; Chen, P. Colorimetric microneedle patches for multiplexed transdermal detection of metabolites. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 212, 114412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, H.; He, Y.; Xu, L.; Wei, Y. Fabrication of polydopamine/hemin-cyclodextrin supramolecular assemblies for mimicking natural peroxidases and their sensitive detection of cholesterol. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 328, 115490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zheng, W.-L.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Li, L.-K.; Li, X.-G.; Zhao, Y. A plug-and-play optical fiber SPR sensor for simultaneous measurement of glucose and cholesterol concentrations. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 198, 113798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. He, Y.; Li, N.; Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Q. 5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis (4-carboxylphenyl) porphyrin functionalized NiCo2S4 yolk-shell nanospheres: Excellent peroxidase-like activity, catalytic mechanism and fast cascade colorimetric biosensor for cholesterol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 326, 128850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vrielink, A. Cholesterol oxidase: Structure and function. In Cholesterol Binding and Cholesterol Transport Proteins: Structure and Function in Health and Disease; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 51, pp. 137–158. [Google Scholar]
  18. Song, K.; Yang, R.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, G.; Zhao, N. The structures of CoFe2O4/PEDOT electrodes effect on the stability and specific capacity for electrochemical energy storage. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 542, 148670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, D.-M.; Xu, B.; Dong, C. Recent advances in colorimetric strategies for acetylcholinesterase assay and their applications. Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 142, 116320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, M.; Yang, C. Blue fluorescent emitters: Design tactics and applications in organic light-emitting diodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 4963–4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, X.; Tan, Z.; Lin, L.; He, J.; He, C.; Thackray, B.D.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, J. Surface-Enhanced Raman Nanoprobes with Embedded Standards for Quantitative Cholesterol Detection. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, Y.; Chen, J.-Y.; He, W.-M. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy biosensor based on silver nanoparticles@ metal-organic frameworks with peroxidase-mimicking activities for ultrasensitive monitoring of blood cholesterol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 365, 131939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, S.; Cai, W.; Kong, L.; Lei, Y. Surface nanometer-scale patterning in realizing large-scale ordered arrays of metallic nanoshells with well-defined structures and controllable properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2527–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, H.; Zhu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Cai, D. Functionalized UIO-66@ Ag nanoparticles substrate for rapid and ultrasensitive SERS detection of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in plastics. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 349, 130793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yao, J.; Quan, Y.; Gao, M.; Gao, R.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Lang, J.; Shen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L. AgNPs decorated Mg-doped ZnO heterostructure with dramatic SERS activity for trace detection of food contaminants. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 8199–8208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, C.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; Gao, X.; Xu, Y.; Wei, Q.; Man, B.; Yang, C. Suspended 3D AgNPs/CNT nanohybrids for the SERS application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 487, 1077–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, L.; Li, C.; Luo, Y.; Jiang, Z. Silver nanosol SERS quantitative analysis of ultratrace biotin coupled N-doped carbon dots catalytic amplification with affinity reaction. Food Chem. 2020, 317, 126433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, T.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Tao, S. Preparation of hollow silver-polymer microspheres with a hierarchical structure for SERS. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 490, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ren, X.; Cheshari, E.C.; Qi, J.; Li, X. Silver microspheres coated with a molecularly imprinted polymer as a SERS substrate for sensitive detection of bisphenol A. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, J.; Li, W.; Rao, Y.; Shi, F.; Yu, S.; Yang, H.; Min, L.; Yang, Z. Synthesis of highly ordered AgNPs-coated silica photonic crystal beads for sensitive and reproducible 3D SERS substrates. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 150–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, L.; Huang, J.; Su, M.-J.; Wu, J.-D.; Liu, W. AgNPs decorated 3D bionic silicon nanograss arrays pattern with high-density hot-spots for SERS sensing via green galvanic displacement without additives. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 27152–27159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Su, K.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Zuo, S.; Ha, Y.; Dan, J.; Chen, W.; Sun, C.; Dai, Z.; Shi, X. Selectively encapsulating Ag nanoparticles on the surface of two-dimensional graphene for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 492, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, H.; Ni, D.; Yu, Z.; Liang, P. Preparation of SERS-active substrates based on graphene oxide/silver nanocomposites for rapid zdetection of l-Theanine. Food Chem. 2017, 217, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hu, P.; Xia, C.; Liu, B.; Feng, R.; Wang, M.; Zhu, H.; Niu, X. In situ controllable growth of Ag particles on paper for smartphone optical sensing of Hg2+ based on nanozyme activity stimulation. Talanta 2023, 253, 124055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ju, J.; Zhang, R.; Chen, W. Photochemical deposition of surface-clean silver nanoparticles on nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for sensitive colorimetric detection of glutathione. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 228, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mou, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Chen, X.; Fan, K.; Liu, H. Nanozymes for regenerative medicine. Small Methods 2022, 6, 2200997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, J.F.; Huang, Y.F.; Ding, Y.; Yang, Z.L.; Li, S.B.; Zhou, X.S.; Fan, F.R.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Wu, D.Y. Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nature 2010, 464, 392–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, Y.-J.; Ze, H.; Fang, P.-P.; Huang, Y.-F.; Kudelski, A.; Fernández-Vidal, J.; Hardwick, L.J.; Lipkowski, J.; Tian, Z.-Q.; Li, J.-F. Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Met. Primers 2023, 3, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ju, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Regmi, S.; Yang, G.; Tang, S. Development of fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM and IgG based on aggregation-induced emission carbon dots. Front. Bioeng. Biotech. 2022, 10, 1042926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yuen, C.; Liu, Q. Optimization of Fe3O4@ Ag nanoshells in magnetic field-enriched surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering for malaria diagnosis. Analyst 2013, 138, 6494–6500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ju, J.; Liu, W.; Perlaki, C.M.; Chen, K.; Feng, C.; Liu, Q. Sustained and cost effective silver substrate for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy based biosensing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, X.-T.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, D.-H.; Yue, S.; Yang, C.-G.; Xu, Z.-R. Multitarget sensing of glucose and cholesterol based on Janus hydrogel microparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 92, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jin, J.; Song, W.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Tian, Y.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, S.; Yang, B.; Zhao, B. A highly sensitive SERS platform based on small-sized Ag/GQDs nanozyme for intracellular analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gao, L.; Zhuang, J.; Nie, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N.; Wang, T.; Feng, J.; Yang, D.; Perrett, S. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sun, L.; Li, S.; Ding, W.; Yao, Y.; Yang, X.; Yao, C. Fluorescence detection of cholesterol using a nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dot/chromium picolinate complex-based sensor. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 9006–9014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mondal, A.; Jana, N.R. Fluorescent detection of cholesterol using β-cyclodextrin functionalized graphene. Chem. Comm. 2012, 48, 7316–7318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xiao, W.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, H. Sensitive cholesterol determination by β-cyclodextrin recognition based on fluorescence enhancement of gold nanoclusters. Microchem. J. 2022, 175, 107125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nirala, N.R.; Abraham, S.; Kumar, V.; Bansal, A.; Srivastava, A.; Saxena, P.S. Colorimetric detection of cholesterol based on highly efficient peroxidase mimetic activity of graphene quantum dots. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 218, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. He, Y.; Niu, X.; Shi, L.; Zhao, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, W.; Pan, J.; Zhang, X.; Yan, Y.; Lan, M. Photometric determination of free cholesterol via cholesterol oxidase and carbon nanotube supported Prussian blue as a peroxidase mimic. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 2181–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hong, C.; Zhang, X.; Wu, C.; Chen, Q.; Yang, H.; Yang, D.; Huang, Z.; Cai, R.; Tan, W. On-site colorimetric detection of cholesterol based on polypyrrole nanoparticles. ACS App. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 54426–54432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.-N.; Sun, X.-T.; Chen, L.; Xu, Z.-R. Boron nitride nanosheet/CuS nanocomposites as mimetic peroxidase for sensitive colorimetric detection of cholesterol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, H.-Y.; Xin, P.-L.; Xu, H.-B.; Lv, J.; Qian, R.-C.; Li, D.-W. Self-Assembled Plasmonic Nanojunctions Mediated by Host–Guest Interaction for Ultrasensitive Dual-Mode Detection of Cholesterol. ACS Sens. 2023, 8, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, S.; Chen, S.; Shang, K.; Gao, X.; Wang, X. Sensitive electrochemical detection of cholesterol using a portable paper sensor based on the synergistic effect of cholesterol oxidase and nanoporous gold. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Manjunatha, R.; Suresh, G.S.; Melo, J.S.; D’Souza, S.F.; Venkatesha, T.V. An amperometric bienzymatic cholesterol biosensor based on functionalized graphene modified electrode and its electrocatalytic activity towards total cholesterol determination. Talanta 2012, 99, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biosensors 13 00927 sch001
Scheme 1. Illustration of the Ag NPs@DCD based on SERS biosensor to detect cholesterol.
Scheme 1. Illustration of the Ag NPs@DCD based on SERS biosensor to detect cholesterol.
Biosensors 13 00927 sch001
Biosensors 13 00927 g001
Figure 1. TEM images of DCD (A), Ag NPs (B) and Ag NP@DCD (C). Inset of the (A,C) show the size histograms of the DCD and Ag NPs@DCD, respectively. (D) HRTEM images of Ag NP@DCD and FFT patterns of DCD and Ag NPs@DCD shown in inset a and b respectively.
Figure 1. TEM images of DCD (A), Ag NPs (B) and Ag NP@DCD (C). Inset of the (A,C) show the size histograms of the DCD and Ag NPs@DCD, respectively. (D) HRTEM images of Ag NP@DCD and FFT patterns of DCD and Ag NPs@DCD shown in inset a and b respectively.
Biosensors 13 00927 g001
Biosensors 13 00927 g002
Figure 2. (A) EDX maps image of Ag NPs@DC, (B) C, (C) N, (D) S, (E) Ag and (F) overlapped image of Ag and S element.
Figure 2. (A) EDX maps image of Ag NPs@DC, (B) C, (C) N, (D) S, (E) Ag and (F) overlapped image of Ag and S element.
Biosensors 13 00927 g002
Biosensors 13 00927 g003
Figure 3. (A) UV–vis absorption spectra of DCD, Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD. Inset (A) shows the samples image as prepared in the bottle (from left to right: DCD, Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD). (B) UV–vis absorption spectra of TMB (curve blue line), oxTMB containing Ag NPs (curve black) and Ag NPs@DCD (curve red) in the presence of H2O2, respectively. The inset (B) shows digital photographs of the corresponding color changes.
Figure 3. (A) UV–vis absorption spectra of DCD, Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD. Inset (A) shows the samples image as prepared in the bottle (from left to right: DCD, Ag NPs and Ag NPs@DCD). (B) UV–vis absorption spectra of TMB (curve blue line), oxTMB containing Ag NPs (curve black) and Ag NPs@DCD (curve red) in the presence of H2O2, respectively. The inset (B) shows digital photographs of the corresponding color changes.
Biosensors 13 00927 g003
Biosensors 13 00927 g004
Figure 4. SERS spectra of R6G (1 μM) adsorbed on freshly prepared Ag NPs (curve black) and Ag NPs@DCD (curves red).
Figure 4. SERS spectra of R6G (1 μM) adsorbed on freshly prepared Ag NPs (curve black) and Ag NPs@DCD (curves red).
Biosensors 13 00927 g004
Biosensors 13 00927 g005
Figure 5. Steady-state kinetic assay of Ag NPs@DCD nanocomposites. (A) TMB concentration used was 0.8 mM. (B) Lineweaver–Burk plots obtained for H2O2 with different concentrations (0.5, 0.8 and 1 mM). (C) H2O2 concentration was 20 μM. (D) Lineweaver–Burk plots obtained for TMB with serial concentrations of H2O2 (10, 20 and 30 μM).
Figure 5. Steady-state kinetic assay of Ag NPs@DCD nanocomposites. (A) TMB concentration used was 0.8 mM. (B) Lineweaver–Burk plots obtained for H2O2 with different concentrations (0.5, 0.8 and 1 mM). (C) H2O2 concentration was 20 μM. (D) Lineweaver–Burk plots obtained for TMB with serial concentrations of H2O2 (10, 20 and 30 μM).
Biosensors 13 00927 g005
Biosensors 13 00927 g006
Figure 6. Effect of the concentration of Ag NPs@DCD nanozyme (A) and TMB concentration (B).
Figure 6. Effect of the concentration of Ag NPs@DCD nanozyme (A) and TMB concentration (B).
Biosensors 13 00927 g006
Biosensors 13 00927 g007
Figure 7. (A) SERS spectra of TMB-Ag NPs@DCD solution with various concentrations of cholesterol. (B) The SERS intensity with respect to logarithmic concentration of cholesterol at 1605 cm−1.
Figure 7. (A) SERS spectra of TMB-Ag NPs@DCD solution with various concentrations of cholesterol. (B) The SERS intensity with respect to logarithmic concentration of cholesterol at 1605 cm−1.
Biosensors 13 00927 g007
Biosensors 13 00927 g008
Figure 8. Study on the performance of selectively testing cholesterol with fibrate sensors. (A) SERS spectra and (B) the characteristic peak of oxTMB at 1605 cm−1 indicate to cholesterol (200 μM), Glu (200 μM), AA (200 μM), UA (200 μM), Urea (200 μM), MgCl2 (200 μM), and DA (200 μM), respectively.
Figure 8. Study on the performance of selectively testing cholesterol with fibrate sensors. (A) SERS spectra and (B) the characteristic peak of oxTMB at 1605 cm−1 indicate to cholesterol (200 μM), Glu (200 μM), AA (200 μM), UA (200 μM), Urea (200 μM), MgCl2 (200 μM), and DA (200 μM), respectively.
Biosensors 13 00927 g008
Table 1. Comparison of detection performances of different sensing systems for cholesterol analysis.
Table 1. Comparison of detection performances of different sensing systems for cholesterol analysis.
MethodsSensing SystemLinear Range
(μM)		LOD
(μM)		Refs.
FluorometryN-GQDs/CrPic0–5200.4[45]
b-CD-G-R6G5–305[46]
CD-AuNCs10–1005.77[47]
ColorimetryChOx/GQDs-TMB-H2O220–6006[48]
ChOx-PB/MWCNT4–1003.01[49]
PPy NPs10–1003.5[50]
BNNS@CuS10–1002.9[51]
SERSAgNPs@MIL-101(Fe)1–1000.36[21]
HS-β-CD@Au0.45–220.74[52]
ElectrochemialNPG/SPE50–60008.36[53]
ChOx-FG/Gr50–3505[54]
SERSTMB-Ag NPs@DCD2–2000.8This work
Table 2. Total cholesterol monitoring in serum samples with the proposed SERS sensing.
Table 2. Total cholesterol monitoring in serum samples with the proposed SERS sensing.
SampleAdded (µM)Found (µM)Recovery (%)RSD (%)
Serum 1 12.87 1.50
113.9699.803.20
1021.47101.904.51
2539.46102.802.17
Serum 2 10.98 0.98
112.0599.981.46
1020.65102.901.58
2536.76101.902.68
Serum 3 11.36 1.42
112.5099.001.51
1021.98100.802.30
2536.07101.761.98
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ju, J.; Li, L.; Li, B.; Regmi, S.; Wang, T.; Xu, J.; Li, C.; Tang, S. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Active Core-Shell Ag NPs@Carbon Dots with Enzyme-Mimicking Activities for Label-Free Measurement Cholesterol. Biosensors 2023, 13, 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13100927

AMA Style

Ju J, Li L, Li B, Regmi S, Wang T, Xu J, Li C, Tang S. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Active Core-Shell Ag NPs@Carbon Dots with Enzyme-Mimicking Activities for Label-Free Measurement Cholesterol. Biosensors. 2023; 13(10):927. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13100927

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ju, Jian, Lin Li, Bei Li, Sagar Regmi, Tingting Wang, Jiao Xu, Chaojie Li, and Shixing Tang. 2023. "Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Active Core-Shell Ag NPs@Carbon Dots with Enzyme-Mimicking Activities for Label-Free Measurement Cholesterol" Biosensors 13, no. 10: 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13100927

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop