Next Article in Journal
Facile Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots from Lignocellulosic Waste
Next Article in Special Issue
Multifunctional PLA Blends Containing Chitosan Mediated Silver Nanoparticles: Thermal, Mechanical, Antibacterial, and Degradation Properties
Previous Article in Journal
The Preparation and Properties of Multilayer Cu-MTa2O5 Composite Coatings on Ti6Al4V for Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Biodegradable and Biocompatible Nanocomposites in Electronics: Current Status and Future Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Way to Predict Gold Nanoparticles/Polymer Hybrid Microgel Agglomeration Based on Rheological Studies

Institute of Polymer Science and Technology (ICTP-CSIC), C/Juan de la Cierva 3, 28006 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(10), 1499; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101499
Submission received: 10 September 2019 / Revised: 9 October 2019 / Accepted: 11 October 2019 / Published: 21 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Biodegradable Nanocomposites)

Abstract

:
In this work, a detailed rheological study of hybrid poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) P(AAm-co-AAc) aqueous microgel dispersions is performed. Our intention is to understand how the presence of gold nanoparticles, AuNP, embedded within the microgel matrix, affects the viscoelastic properties, the colloidal gel structure formation, and the structure recovery after cessation of the deformation of the aqueous microgel dispersions. Frequency sweep experiments confirmed that hybrid microgel dispersions present a gel-like behavior and that the presence of AuNP content within microgel matrix contributes to the elasticity of the microgel dispersions. Strain sweep test confirmed that hybrid microgels aqueous dispersion also form colloidal gel structures that break upon deformation but that can be recovered when the deformation decreases. The fractal analysis performed to hybrid microgels, by applying Shih et al. and Wu and Morbidelli’s scaling theories, evidenced that AuNP significantly affects the colloidal gel structure configuration ending up with the formation of agglomerates or microgel clusters with closer structures in comparison to the reference P(AAm-co-AAc) aqueous microgel dispersions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among all colloidal systems, the sub micrometer-sized hydrogel (microgels) particles are of special interest [1,2]. After decades of research, polymeric microgels have revealed their versatility from both the functionality (responsiveness) and applications perspective. These smart materials have received much attention owing to their environmentally tunable sizes and potential applications, such as chemical separation, catalysis, sensors, enzyme immobilization, drug delivery systems, biomimicking artificial synovial fluids, tissue mimicking, and injectable 3D cell scaffolds, among others [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Besides the mentioned advanced applications, microgels are used as building blocks to create structures such as colloidal crystals, films, and gels in the macroscopic scale [9,10,11,12], and more recently as active sites confined within electrospun polymer fibers toward the design of tailored multifunctional stimuli-responsive advanced materials [13,14,15,16]. In our previous works, we first developed poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) microgels featured with the ability to swell upon heating, thus showing a positive thermosensitivity and an upper critical solution temperature-like (UCST) volume phase transition temperature [17,18]. This thermo-responsiveness derived from the presence of acrylic acid that forms hydrogen bonds with acrylamide. The obtained UCST-like microgels were characterized in terms size, shape, and thermoresponsiveness, so that the effect of the composition–crosslinking degree and acrylic acid comonomer content could be understood. Moreover, rheological behavior of aqueous poly (acrylamide-acrylic acid) microgel dispersions was also studied from the perspective of a colloidal system. This study outlined their macroscopic elasticity showing that the material behaves as a colloidal gel [17,18].
As deduced from the literature, the evolution of microgel systems advanced toward the development of hybrid systems (organic/inorganic systems). In fact, since the first work of Antonietti et al. [19], in which microgels were used as microreactor and “exo-templates” for the controlled growth of gold nanoparticles, the development of hybrid microgels has increased significantly [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. This interest is related to the fact that the incorporation of inorganic nanoparticles into polymeric microgels provided additional functionalities to the final system [29,30]. For instance, the incorporation of gold nanoparticles to thermoresponsive microgels would provide optical properties and thus dual-stimuli responsiveness; the system could be remotely activated (swollen) via light [23].
The intention with this work, besides understanding the effect of adding a nanoparticle into a nano/microgel in the flow behavior, is to propose our approach as a tool to control/predict the formation, breakage, and reformation of agglomerates in colloidal dispersion that might influence their final applications, in particular as drug delivery systems, carriers, or similar. For such purpose, in the present work a detailed rheological study of hybrid P(AAm-co-AAc) microgel dispersions is presented. Thus, the aim of this research is to understand how the presence of gold nanoparticles AuNP, that are embedded within the P(AAm-co-AAc) microgel matrix, could modify the viscoelastic properties of the aqueous microgel dispersions and their macroscopic elasticity. In previous studies, we could determine that P(AAm-co-AAc) aqueous microgels dispersion present a gel-like behavior associated not only to the gel nature of the polymeric microgels themselves, but also to the formation of certain structure due to interactions occurring between microgel particles within the dispersion. Therefore, in this work we will determine if the presence of AuNP within microgels could modify such interactions and hence the described gel-like behavior. To do so, we used two scaling models (Shih et al. [31] and Wu and Morbidelli [32]) to perform a fractal analysis of the hybrid aqueous microgel dispersions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

As monomer and comonomer we used acrylamide (AA, 99% pure, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) and acrylic acid (AAc, Sigma-Aldrich), respectively. To obtain crosslinked microgels N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.5% pure) was used as crosslinking agent. The reaction was initiated using 2,2’-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine)dihydrochloride (AMPA-d, Sigma-Aldrich, 97% pure). As part of the organic phase, span 80 (sorbitan monooleate) (Fluka, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and dodecane (Fluka, 99% pure) were used as surfactant and organic solvent, respectively. Gold nanoparticles (AuNP) used for their encapsulation into microgel matrix were purchased from Nanogap, which are already covered with poly(n-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) so that they can be stable in water dispersion. According to Nanogap, AuNP contain 16% gold and the size is approximately 5 ± 1 nm (See Figure S2). All the water used in the preparation and characterization of microgels was Millipore Milli Q grade.

2.2. Synthesis of Hybrid P(AAm-AAc)-AuNP Microgels

Microgel synthesis was performed by means of inverse emulsion polymerization (w/o) method as described in [27]. The aqueous phase of the emulsion is formed by acrylamide monomer, acrylic acid comonomer, crosslinker, water dispersed gold nanoparticles, and distilled water (See Table 1 for details). For the oil phase, emulsifier (SPAN 80) and the organic solvent (dodecane) were mixed. Prior to the reaction, both solutions were purged with nitrogen during 30 min. Then, we incorporated the organic phase into a three-necked round bottom flask. Over this organic phase we added the aqueous phase solution by means of a peristaltic pump with a feeding rate of 1.5 mL/min while the forming emulsion was mechanically stirred at 475 r.p.m. This procedure derived in the formation of aqueous phase droplets dispersed in the organic phase. These droplets act as reservoir where the radical polymerization reaction occurs. Finally, the polymerization was thermally initiated using a 2,2’Azo-bis-(2-methylpropionamidine-dihydrochloride (AMPA-d) solution. (The reaction took place at 50 °C, which is the decomposition temperature of the initiator.) Immediately after adding the initiator, the emulsion became turbid. From this stage, the polymerization reaction was allowed to continue for 3 h under nitrogen atmosphere. After this period of time, the reaction was cooled down to room temperature while the stirring and nitrogen flow was maintained to avoid aggregation. Finally, all the prepared emulsions were purified by removal of organic phase by decantation and the remaining aqueous phase was further precipitated in ethanol with subsequent washing by centrifugation at 4500 r.p.m. All samples were redispersed in deionized water and placed in dialysis bags (molecular weight cut off = 3500) for 1 week to remove any unreacted materials. For the sake of clarity, in Table 1 the recipe and reaction conditions for the hybrid microgel synthesis are described.

2.3. Characterization Methods

The morphological analysis of the microgels was performed by scanning electron microscopy, SEM (ESEM, XL30, Philips, North Billerica, MA, USA) to determine the shape, size, and dispersion of microgels. Transmission Electron Microscopy, TEM (JEM 3000F, 300kv, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to confirm the presence and distribution of AuNP within microgel matrix. For this analysis, dried microgels were further dispersed in acetone (We used acetone in order to promote a rapid evaporation of the solvent.). A drop of the dispersion was deposited in a glass wafer, waited till the solvent evaporates, and sputter-coated with gold to minimize charging at fixed conditions for SEM analysis. For TEM analysis a drop of the dispersion was deposited in formvar/carbon-coated grids.
For the rheological study of the hybrid microgel dispersions ARG2 (TA Instrument, New Castle, DE, USA) stress-controlled rheometer was used. First, we determined the linear viscoelastic range by performing strain sweep tests at a constant and non-destructive frequency of 0.5 Hz for hybrid microgel aqueous dispersion with concentrations of 1, 2, and 5 wt%. Then, we carried out frequency sweep tests at a constant strain of 1%, within the linear viscoelastic region. All measurements were performed at 20 °C, the temperature at which microgels are in their collapsed state [27] and using a 60 mm acrylic parallel plate. The temperature sweep tests were performed, from 1 to 40 °C, at a non-destructive frequency of 0.5 Hz, and at a constant strain of 3%. The protocol used for loading the sample were the same for all the aliquots. We used a 1 mL micropipette to add the same volume. The plastic tip used for the loading was previously cut in order to avoid any unwanted deformation prior to the measurement. Microgel dispersions were squeezed the same, by selecting the same gap for all the microgel dispersions and controlling the normal force exerted to each dispersion, so that the initial state is the same for all the samples. In order to preserve or not affect structural equilibrium of the microgels dispersions, we did not perform any preshear prior to the strain sweep test. To ensure a reproducibility and to obtain an average of the determined parameters we performed a minimum of 5 measurements of each microgel dispersion. To determine the critical strain from the stain sweep tests, we selected the second point that comes out of the linearity that coincides with the >5% deviation rule. Fractal analysis was carried out by the application of two scaling theories: Shih et al. [31] and Wu and Morbidelli [32].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology

Figure 1 shows SEM (A, B, C) micrographs corresponding to P(AAm-co-AAc) microgels and hybrid microgels containing 5% and 10% of AuNP. As observed, the synthesized P(AAm-co-AAc) microgels are of spherical shape with diameters in the range of 200 to 500 nm (Figure 1A), which is in agreement with the definition of microgel: intramolecularly crosslinked polymer particle with diameter size in the range of 100 nm to 1 µm. The incorporation of AuNP did not affect the morphology of P(AAm-co-AAc) microgels as seen in both Figure 1B,C and already envisaged in previous work [27]. The hybrid microgels are also of spherical shape with similar diameter sizes. Therefore, in terms of morphology, microgels shape and size were not affected by the addition of AuNP, probably due to the small quantity of added nanoparticles and their small size (5 nm) as well. Nevertheless, SEM technique does not allow to detect AuNP.
In order to confirm the successful encapsulation of AuNP, TEM micrographs corresponding to P (AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP hybrid microgel sample (Figure 1D,E) are depicted in Figure 2A–D. Those micrographs, reprinted with permission of Elsevier, were taken from our previous work [27]. As shown in Figure 2A, AuNP appear as black spheres in an organic matrix. In particular, in Figure 2A it is possible to observe the atomic planes of the Au nanoparticles, besides confirming that the particles diameter is approximately 5 ± 1 nm. In Figure 2B the image of a single hybrid microgel with black spheres can be observed. Such image is not clear enough to identify whether AuNP are located inside the microgel matrix or on the surface. But if we focus on the Figure 2C,D (magnified from C), near the edge of a single microgel AuNP particles (black spheres) clearly embedded inside the microgel matrix can be observed. This result confirmed the successful encapsulation of AuNP [27]. In order to determine the final AuNP content we also performed thermogravimetric analysis. From TGA experiments we could conclude that the samples P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP and P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP have a final AuNP content of 3% and 8%, respectively. (See Figure S1 and Table S1 of supporting information).
Regarding the influence of AuNP in the swelling ability and thermo-responsiveness, in a previous work we demonstrated that the incorporation of AuNP shifted the volume phase transition temperature of P(AAm-co-AAc) towards temperatures close to 37 °C [27].
As mentioned in the introductory section of the manuscript, the versatility of polymeric microgels make them very useful for a wide and diverse spectrum of applications. In this particular case, we developed this hybrid dual responsive microgel system so that it could be potentially used as drug carriers for a further controlled drug release [18]. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the rheology of the microgel aqueous dispersions so that their application could not be conditioned due to undesirable or uncontrollable agglomerations that could occur when applied by injection, for instance, or when circulating in the blood stream so that blood clot could be induced. Taking this into consideration, in this work we put effort in determining the rheological properties of these hybrid microgels so that we could better understand their structure-properties-applications relationship.

3.2. Effect of the Incorporation of AuNP in the Viscoelastic Properties of Aqueous Hybrid Microgel Dispersions

Our first step in the rheological characterization of microgel dispersion was to determine their viscoelastic behavior. Figure 3A shows representative frequency sweep tests corresponding to P(AAm-co-AAc), P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP, and P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP aqueous microgel dispersion (C = 5 wt%). As general behavior, the three microgel samples possess the elastic modulus (full symbols) higher than the viscous modulus (empty symbols) at all the frequency ranges studied. Having G’ > G’’ indicates that microgel dispersion presents a solid-like behavior. Moreover, microgel dispersions also present an elastic modulus G’ which is constant and independent of the frequency (showing a finite value at zero frequency). These are the two conditions that define a polymer gel rheologically. Therefore, these two facts together serve to affirm that microgel dispersions present a gel-like behavior as it was also the case of similar systems [17,25]. In addition to these two conditions, the three microgel samples described a minimum in the frequency dependence of G’’ (Figure 3A), which is characteristic of colloidal gels, as stated by Mewis and Wagner [33]. This minimum is better observed in the graph corresponding to the P(AAm-co-AAc) microgel (without AuNP).
For a deeper analysis of the results, in Figure 3B we have collected the elastic modulus plateau G’0 (extrapolated at zero frequency) obtained from the frequency sweep tests performed for hybrid microgel dispersions at three different concentrations (1, 2, and 5 wt%), and represented as a function of AuNP content within the microgel matrix. Two results can be drawn: First, that the elastic modulus increases as the concentration of the aqueous microgel dispersions increases, and second and probably more relevant, that the encapsulation of AuNP within the microgel matrix contributes to increase the elastic modulus of the dispersion. For instance, if we analyze the effect of AuNP content in the dispersions containing 5 wt% of microgel, it is observed that the encapsulation of 5% of AuNP within microgel matrix provokes an increase of the G’ modulus one order of magnitude. When the encapsulated AuNP increases from 5% to 10%, the elastic modulus increases also the double, that is, it evolves from approximately 150 Pa (5% AuNP) to 260 Pa (10% AuNP). This result clearly indicates that AuNP act as a filler reinforcing the microgel matrix. The aqueous microgel dispersions’ elastic character is increased giving rise to a stronger gel-like system with improved viscoelastic properties.
We have confirmed that the encapsulation of AuNP contributes to the elasticity of the system deriving in a stronger gel-like behavior compared to pure microgel dispersions. In previous studies we could determine that the gel-like behavior was associated not only to the gel nature of the polymeric microgels but also to the formation of certain structure (a colloidal gel) due to interactions occurring between microgel particles within the aqueous dispersion [17,25]. In the present work we have studied how hybrid microgel dispersions behave under strain (deformation) and evaluated the influence of AuNP embedded in the microgel matrix. Accordingly, in Figure 4A the evolution of G’ and G’’ with increasing applied strain and for decreasing applied strain is evaluated for P(AAm-co-AAc) (5 wt% microgel concentration).
If we analyze the obtained graphs, at low strains both G’ and G’’ keep constant being G’ > G’’. This first stage defines the linear viscoelastic range (LVR). But as the strain increases, both G’ and G’’ reach the limit of linearity at a critical strain value (γ0), becoming dependent on the strain. At certain strain value the modulus crossover occurs (G’ = G’’). From this point on, viscous modulus is higher than the elastic modulus, which is indicative of the liquid-like behavior of the microgel dispersion. When the applied strain is reduced up to the initial value, both G’ and G’’ start to increase again until recovering their independency against the strain ending up in the gel-like behavior described before. The fact that aqueous microgel dispersions are able to recover their initial gel-like behavior implies the formation of some kind of structure that breaks upon deformation that restructure when the deformation disappears [34,35,36]. However, the obtained absolute values of G’ and G’’ are slightly lower in the upturn measurement, showing an incomplete recovery or hysteresis.
When analyzing the strain dependent behavior of the hybrid microgels shown in Figure 4B,C, a similar trend is observed. Hybrid microgel dispersions described a region in the curve at which G’ and G’’ are independent of the applied strain, but as the strain increases both G’ and G’’ become dependent, the cross-over point is achieved and G’, G’’ end up decreasing. When the strain is reduced, hybrid microgel dispersions recover the initial G’, G’’ values, and therefore, the initial gel-like behavior. Interestingly, the encapsulation of 5% of AuNP within microgel matrix derived in weakened hysteresis. But even more remarkable is the behavior described for the P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel dispersions where no hysteresis is observed. This means that, P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP hybrid microgel dispersion is capable to totally recover the initial colloidal gel structure, and therefore the interactions that held the structure (cluster).
In fact, strain dependence behavior (increasing and further decreasing the applied strain) corresponding to P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP shows two superimposed curves indicating that there is no loss of elasticity; G’ and G’’ recover from the imposed deformation. Therefore, hybrid microgel dispersions are capable to totally recover the interactions between microgels and thus the initial colloidal gel structure.

3.3. Fractal Analysis of Aqueous Hybrid Microgel Dispersions by Means of Shi et al. and Wu and Morbidelli Scaling Theory: Effect of AuNP in the Microgel Interactions

At this stage, from the evaluation of the viscoelastic properties we have confirmed the reinforcement role that AuNP have in the microgel. Additionally, the analysis of the hybrid microgel dispersions behavior under strain put in evidence the formation of some kind of structure that breaks upon deformation and with the ability to recover as the applied deformation decreases gradually. Previous research regarding the rheological behavior of aqueous dispersions of poly (acrylamide-acrylic acid) microgels already outlined their macroscopic elasticity showing that the material behaves as a colloidal gel [17,18]. These two results are relevant for further potential applications that might imply flow of aqueous dispersions. Indeed, shear-thinning of a colloidal suspension could enable a more homogeneous and easy delivery of the material in the case of injectable materials [37]. And if this behavior is complemented with the total recovery of the elastic properties immediately after injection/deformation, this may prevent the flow of the colloidal solution and facilitate that the material remains on the target site.
There are several studies regarding the interplay of microgel inter-particle interaction modifications by changing particle size, surface charge (functionalization), and crosslinking degree [38,39,40,41,42] (most of them used poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) PNIPAM microgels), but reports aimed to evaluate, control, and predict its influence on the fractal structure and cluster formation through rheology are scarce. For instance, Liao et al. [8,43] generated an in-situ formed hydrogel, using PNIPAM microgels as the building blocks to construct injectable thermal gelling scaffold for 3D cell culture, in the presence of Ca2+ to induce changes in the inter-particle interaction. They studied their fractal structure and concluded that both salt concentration and temperature modify the interactions among microgels [8,43]. Recently, we also attempt to modify microgels colloidal behavior through quaternization but no relevant differences were obtained [44]. Therefore, to determine the flow behavior of the hybrid microgel dispersions and to understand how hybrid microgels interact within the aqueous dispersion could be as relevant as the characterization of their responsiveness. Being so, we took advantage of the scaling theories developed by Shih et al. [31] and Wu and Morbidelli [32] and used them as a tool to perform a fractal analysis. These two scaling theories, which are an extension of the computer model proposed by Brown and Ball [45] are based on the fact that microgel dispersions are a collection of flocs–fractal objects closely packed throughout the sample-. These models were recently used to study the interactions occurring among poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) polycationic microgels [44].
Shih et al.’s [31] models differentiated two extreme situations and unravel the intra- and inter-floc interactions in two separate regimes: strong-link regime where inter-floc interactions are stronger than intra-floc (among particles) interactions and weak-link regime where the elasticity is driven by the mechanically weaker part of the system, that is the weak links between flocs. Shih et al. described each regime based on the scaling relationship of both the elastic constant (elastic modulus plateau) and critical deformation with concentration as shown in the following equations:
(i) Strong-link regime:
G 0 φ ( d + x ) / ( d D f )
γ 0 φ ( 1 + x ) / ( d D f )
being φ the concentration, d the Euclidean dimension of the system (d = 3), Df the fractal dimension, and x is the fractal dimension of the aggregated backbone that has to be lower than the fractal dimension and positive (Df > x > 0) [31,46], being a reasonable value 1–1.3 [31].
(ii) Weak-link regime:
G 0 φ ( d 2 ) / ( d D f )
γ 0 φ 1 / ( d D f )
Wu and Morbidelli extended the Shih et al. model to the case where samples belong to a transition regime between the strong and weak link regimes. Therefore, in order to gather these two regimes in a single model, they introduced a new parameter, microscopic elastic constant, α. This parameter describes a range of values from 0 to 1, where α = 0, corresponds to Shih et al.’s strong-link regime whereas α = 1 matches the weak-link regime. Wu and Morbidelli defined the model with the following equations:
G 0 φ β / ( d D f )
γ 0 φ ( d β 1 ) / ( d D f )
β = ( d 2 ) + ( 2 + x ) ( 1 α )
being β an auxiliary parameter that relates α with x.
In order to perform the fractal analysis, strain sweep tests of hybrid microgels aqueous dispersions were carried out at three different concentrations (1, 2, and 5 wt%) as shown in Figure 5: P(AAm-co-AAc) (Figure 5A), P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP (Figure 5B), and P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP (Figure 5C). As observed from the figure, the three samples describe an increase of G’ and G’’ with the microgel concentration. However, the increase of microgel concentration lead to a decrease of the linear viscoelastic range; less strain is necessary to break the formed structure within the dispersion.
We have extracted the average elastic modulus plateau Go and the average critical deformation γ0, for each aqueous microgel dispersions at each studied concentration, and represented as a function of the concentration in Figure 6A,B. As it was expected, both Go and γ0, exhibit a power law relationship with the concentration that can be fitted to the form: Go ~ CA and γ0 ~ CB. When evaluating the concentration dependence of Go, positive slopes are observed for the studied microgel dispersions (as collected in Table 2). In contrast, the evolution of γ0 exhibit negative slopes.
According to the Shih et al. scaling model [31], the fact that γ0 exhibit a negative slope indicates that the three systems fall into the strong-link regime, in which inter-floc interactions are stronger than intra-floc. In the case of P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP microgel dispersion, this strong-link regime is also evidenced in the strain hardening depicted in Figure 5B for the dispersion containing 1 wt% of microgels. Thus, fractal dimension is obtained by applying Equations (1) and (2) of the Shih et al. model and collected in Table 2. But, as shown in the table, results obtained with the Shih et al. model are only valid for the P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel dispersion, being this sample the one that fulfill the requirements mentioned above (having an x value lower than the fractal dimension and positive). In the case of P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP microgel dispersion, although 1 wt% dispersion clearly described a strain hardening behavior, thus supporting the strong-link regime, it is observed that upon addition of more microgels, 2 and 5 wt %, dispersions turn to strain thinning (see Figure 5B), which evidenced a transition between the two regimes, strong- and weak-link. Consequently, in order to evaluate the type of interactions Wu and Morbidelli’s scaling theory needed to be applied. From the applications of Equations (5)–(7) we could obtain the fractal dimension (Df) and microscopic elastic interaction regime (α) of the three studied microgel dispersions (Table 2). Some of the parameters showed significant experimental errors, in particular for P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP; these results would be more accurate with the study of more concentrations however, we have to indicate that our intention with this experiment was to obtain semiquantitative results for comparative purposes.
The estimation of α parameter resulted in values that evolves from 0.63 for P(AAm-co-AAc) to 0.04 for P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP, indicating an evolution from a transitioning regime toward a strong-link regime. It is worth mentioning that there is a lack of agreement between the semi-quantitative strong-link regime assessed for P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel dispersion through Wu and Morbidelli’s model, and the qualitative shear thinning described in Figure 5C.
The encapsulation of AuNP within the microgel matrix contributes to increase the inter-floc interactions, or in other words, hampered the formation of cluster or agglomerates. This result is also in agreement with the estimation for the fractal dimension Df that varies from 2.14 to 1.2 with the incorporation of AuNP. This remarkable decrease of the fractal dimension also indicates that the incorporation of AuNP has changed the growth/aggregation mechanism of the aqueous dispersions. Fractal dimension is an indication of the growth mechanism and stacking density of the particles forming the floc. As stated in the literature two growing mechanisms are identified: reaction-limited and diffusion-limited aggregation mechanisms. Each mechanism gives rise to different agglomerates structures and thus, to different fractal dimensions. In the case of the reaction-limited mechanism, this ends up in agglomerates with denser structures (Df ~ 2.0–2.2) [47,48]. For the diffusion-limited mechanism, agglomerates form looser structures (Df ~ 1.7–1.8) [49]. Taking this into account, we can conclude that the incorporation of AuNP has modified the growth mechanism of P(AAm-co-AAc) micorgels, ending up in the formation of agglomerates with looser structures. It is worth mentioning that the obtained results could also be affected by the spatial distribution of the AuNP within microgel matrix that could be different as the content of AuNP increases [46]. This issue will be studied in further work.

4. Conclusions

The detailed rheological study performed in this work resolves that hybrid microgel dispersions present a gel-like behavior, besides confirming the elasticity reinforcement role of AuNP, as it was expected. By analyzing the behavior under deformation (strain sweep tests), we confirmed the colloidal gel structure which can break upon deformation but completely restructure as the deformation gradually disappears. Metal nanoparticles (AuNP) also play a major role in the recovery of the structure. From the application of the scaling theories, we also determined that the incorporation of metal nanoparticles (AuNP) affects significantly the colloidal structure formation to the point of modifying the growth mechanism from a reaction-limited to a diffusion-limited aggregation mechanism with the incorporation of 10 wt% AuNP. In conclusion, the incorporation of AuNP modifies the agglomerate growth mechanism giving rise to agglomerates with looser structures at rest that are easily deformable.
The strategy used in this work serves as a tool to control the formation, breakage, and reformation of agglomerates under stress through rheological characterization. Moreover, it opens a new way to predict metal nanoparticle effect in the microgel dispersions behavior through simple stress sweep tests, being the targeted objective. In addition, this facilitates the preparation of a more homogeneous and easy applicable system, for instance when applied for injectable systems [37]. In addition, the recovery of the elastic properties immediately after injection (deformation) may prevent the flow of the colloidal solution and facilitate that the material remains on the target site [50]. In summary, the approach presented herein is straightforward and simple, besides potentially inducing additional functionalities to the microgel system derived from the nanoparticles responsiveness itself.
Being able to control and program the flow behavior of microgel dispersion would be extremely helpful in order to ensure the success of their final application, in particular as drug delivery systems, carriers, or similar. Being able to tailor how stimuli responsive microgels should behave under deformation, and at rest, would avoid undesirable or unexpected agglomeration problems that could limit their responsiveness or have dramatic consequences as blood clots when referring to real in-vivo use of the smart dispersions. In conclusion, this work puts in evidence the importance of understanding the rheological behavior and fractal structure of stimuli responsive microgels for further potential applications that might be implied in flow/deformation of aqueous dispersions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/10/1499/s1, Figure S1: TGA Thermograms corresponding to P(AAm-co-AAc) (black), P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP (red) and P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP (green). Table S1: Results corresponding to the residue obtained from TGA experiments.

Author Contributions

Investigation, C.E. and C.M.; methodology, C.E.; supervision, C.M.; writing—original draft, C.E.; writing—review and editing, C.E. and C.M.

Acknowledgments

CE acknowledges IJCI-2015-26432 contract from MINEICO.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gennes, P.-G. Nobel Lecture—Soft Matter; 4930838533; Angewandte Chemie International Edition: Paris, France, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  2. De Gennes, P.G. Ultradivided matter. Nature 2001, 412, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thorne, J.B.; Vine, G.J.; Snowden, M.J. Microgel applications and commercial considerations. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2011, 289, 625–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Muratalin, M.; Luckham, P.F.; Esimova, A.; Aidarova, S.; Mutaliyeva, B.; Madybekova, G.; Sharipova, A.; Issayeva, A. Study of N-isopropylacrylamide-based microgel particles as a potential drug delivery agents. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 532, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Madrigal, J.L.; Sharma, S.N.; Campbell, K.T.; Stilhano, R.S.; Gijsbers, R.; Silva, E.A. Microgels produced using microfluidic on-chip polymer blending for controlled released of VEGF encoding lentivectors. Acta Biomater. 2018, 69, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, G.; Liu, Z.; Li, N.; Wang, X.; Zhou, F.; Liu, W. Hairy Polyelectrolyte Brushes-Grafted Thermosensitive Microgels as Artificial Synovial Fluid for Simultaneous Biomimetic Lubrication and Arthritis Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 20452–20463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Joshi, A.; Nandi, S.; Chester, D.; Brown, A.C.; Muller, M. Study of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) (pNIPAM) Microgel Particle Induced Deformations of Tissue-Mimicking Phantom by Ultrasound Stimulation. Langmuir 2018, 34, 1457–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gan, T.; Zhang, Y.; Guan, Y. In Situ Gelation of P(NIPAM-HEMA) Microgel Dispersion and Its Applications as Injectable 3D Cell Scaffold. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 1410–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gelissen, A.P.; Schmid, A.J.; Plamper, F.A.; Pergushov, D.V.; Richtering, W. Quaternized microgels as soft templates for polyelectrolyte layer-by-layer assemblies. Polymer 2014, 55, 1991–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jia, S.; Tang, Z.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, Y. Order–Disorder Transition in Doped Microgel Colloidal Crystals and Its Application for Optical Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 14254–14258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, C.W.; South, A.B.; Hu, X.; Verdes, C.; Kim, J.-D.; Lyon, L.A. Gold nanoparticles reinforce self-healing microgel multilayers. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2010, 289, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Krüger, A.J.D.; Köhler, J.; Cichosz, S.; Rose, J.C.; Gehlen, D.B.; Haraszti, T.; Möller, M.; De Laporte, L.; Krüger, A.J.D.; Koehler, J. A catalyst-free, temperature controlled gelation system for in-mold fabrication of microgels. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 6943–6946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Faria, J.; Echeverria, C.; Borges, J.P.; Godinho, M.H.; Soares, P.I.P. Towards the development of multifunctional hybrid fibrillary gels: Production and optimization by colloidal electrospinning. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 48972–48979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marques, S.C.S.; Soares, P.I.P.; Zabala, C.E.; Godinho, M.H.; Borges, J.P. Confinement of thermoresponsive microgels into fibres via colloidal electrospinning: Experimental and statistical analysis. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 76370–76380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Diaz, J.E.; Barrero, A.; Marquez, M.; Fernandez-Nieves, A.; Loscertales, I.G. Absorption properties of microgel-pvp composite nanofibers made by electrospinning. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Leon, A.M.; Aguilera, J.M.; Park, D.J. Mechanical, rheological and structural properties of fiber-containing microgels based on whey protein and alginate. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Echeverria, C.; López, D.; Mijangos, C.; Zabala, C.E. UCST Responsive Microgels of Poly(acrylamide−acrylic acid) Copolymers: Structure and Viscoelastic Properties. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 9118–9123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zabala, C.E.; Peppas, N.A.; Mijangos, C. Novel strategy for the determination of UCST-like microgels network structure: Effect on swelling behavior and rheology. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 337–346. [Google Scholar]
  19. Antonietti, M.; Gröhn, F.; Hartmann, J.; Bronstein, L. Nonclassical Shapes of Noble-Metal Colloids by Synthesis in Microgel Nanoreactors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 2080–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yoshida, A.; Kitayama, Y.; Kiguchi, K.; Yamada, T.; Akasaka, H.; Sasaki, R.; Takeuchi, T. Gold Nanoparticle-Incorporated Molecularly Imprinted Microgels as Radiation Sensitizers in Pancreatic Cancer. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 1177–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, J.; Tang, D.; Jia, S.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Yang, X.; Zou, H.; Lv, H. In situ thermal synthesis of molybdenum oxide nanocrystals in thermoresponsive microgels. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 563, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brändel, T.; Sabadasch, V.; Hannappel, Y.; Hellweg, T. Improved Smart Microgel Carriers for Catalytic Silver Nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 4636–4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Das, M.; Sanson, N.; Fava, D.; Kumacheva, E. Microgels Loaded with Gold Nanorods: Photothermally Triggered Volume Transitions under Physiological Conditions†. Langmuir 2007, 23, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, J.; Xu, S.; Kumacheva, E. Polymer Microgels: Reactors for Semiconductor, Metal, and Magnetic Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7908–7914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Echeverria, C.; Mijangos, C.; Zabala, C.E. UCST-Like Hybrid PAAm-AA/Fe3O4 Microgels. Effect of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles on Morphology, Thermosensitivity and Elasticity. Langmuir 2011, 27, 8027–8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Echeverria, C.; Soares, P.; Robalo, A.; Pereira, L.; Novo, C.M.; Ferreira, I.; Borges, J.P. One-pot synthesis of dual-stimuli responsive hybrid PNIPAAm-chitosan microgels. Mater. Des. 2015, 86, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Echeverria, C.; Mijangos, C. Effect of gold nanoparticles on the thermosensitivity, morphology, and optical properties of poly(acrylamide-acrylic acid) microgels. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Scarabelli, L.; Schumacher, M.; De Aberasturi, D.J.; Merkl, J.-P.; Henriksen-Lacey, M.; De Oliveira, T.M.; Janschel, M.; Schmidtke, C.; Bals, S.; Weller, H.; et al. Encapsulation of Noble Metal Nanoparticles through Seeded Emulsion Polymerization as Highly Stable Plasmonic Systems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pérez-Juste, J.; Pastoriza-Santos, I.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Multifunctionality in metal@microgel colloidal nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Strozyk, M.S.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Henriksen-Lacey, M.; Brust, M.; Liz-Marzán, L.M. Biocompatible, Multiresponsive Nanogel Composites for Codelivery of Antiangiogenic and Chemotherapeutic Agents. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 2303–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shih, W.-H.; Shih, W.Y.; Kim, S.-I.; Liu, J.; Aksay, I.A. Scaling behavior of the elastic properties of colloidal gels. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 42, 4772–4779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, H.; Morbidelli, M. A Model Relating Structure of Colloidal Gels to Their Elastic Properties. Langmuir 2001, 17, 1030–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mewis, J.; Wagner, N.J. Colloidal Suspension Rheology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sprakel, J.; Lindström, S.B.; Kodger, T.E.; Weitz, D.A. Stress enhancement in the delayed yielding of colloidal gels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 248303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stokes, J.R.; Frith, W.J. Rheology of gelling and yielding soft matter systems. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Diba, M.; Wang, H.; Kodger, T.E.; Parsa, S.; Leeuwenburgh, S.C.G. Highly Elastic and Self-Healing Composite Colloidal Gels. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Guvendiren, M.; Lu, H.D.; Burdick, J.A. Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Guan, Y.; Zhu, X.X. Gelation Kinetics of Thermosensitive PNIPAM Microgel Dispersions. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2011, 212, 2052–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gan, T.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, Y. Thermogelable PNIPAM microgel dispersion as 3D cell scaffold: Effect of syneresis. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 5937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cheng, D.; Wu, Y.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, Y. Tuning properties of injectable hydrogel scaffold by PEG blending. Polymer 2012, 53, 5124–5131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, T.; Jin, L.; Song, Y.; Li, J.; Gao, Y.; Shi, S. Rheological study on the thermoinduced gelation behavior of poly(N -isopropylacrylamide-co -acrylic acid) microgel suspensions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fraylich, M.R.; Liu, R.; Richardson, S.M.; Baird, P.; Hoyland, J.; Freemont, A.J.; Alexander, C.; Shakesheff, K.; Cellesi, F.; Saunders, B.R. Thermally-triggered gelation of PLGA dispersions: Towards an injectable colloidal cell delivery system. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 344, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Guan, Y.; Zhu, X.X. Fractal Structures of the Hydrogels Formed in Situ from Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Microgel Dispersions. Langmuir 2012, 28, 10873–10880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Echeverría, C.; Aragón-Gutiérrez, A.; Fernández-García, M.; Muñoz-Bonilla, A.; López, D. Thermoresponsive Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide-co-Dimethylaminoethyl Methacrylate) Microgel Aqueous Dispersions with Potential Antimicrobial Properties. Polymers 2019, 11, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Brown, W.D.; Ball, R.C. Computer simulation of chemically limited aggregation. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1985, 18, L517–L521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vermant, J.; Ceccia, S.; Dolgovskij, M.K.; Maffettone, P.L.; Macosko, C.W. Quantifying dispersion of layered nanocomposites via melt rheology. J. Rheol. 2007, 51, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kolb, M.; Botet, R.; Jullien, R. Scaling of Kinetically Growing Clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51, 1123–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Meakin, P. Formation of Fractal Clusters and Networks by Irreversible Diffusion-Limited Aggregation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51, 1119–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Witten, T.A.; Sander, L.M. Diffusion-Limited Aggregation, a Kinetic Critical Phenomenon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1981, 47, 1400–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yan, C.; Mackay, M.E.; Czymmek, K.; Nagarkar, R.P.; Schneider, J.P.; Pochan, D.J. Injectable Solid Peptide Hydrogel as a Cell Carrier: Effects of Shear Flow on Hydrogels and Cell Payload. Langmuir 2012, 28, 6076–6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Representative SEM micrographs corresponding to the samples (A) P(AAm-co-AAc), (B) P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP, and (C) P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP.
Figure 1. Representative SEM micrographs corresponding to the samples (A) P(AAm-co-AAc), (B) P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP, and (C) P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP.
Nanomaterials 09 01499 g001
Figure 2. A to D figures show TEM images corresponding to the sample P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP (Adapted from [27] with permission from, Wiley-VCH, Copyright 2010).
Figure 2. A to D figures show TEM images corresponding to the sample P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP (Adapted from [27] with permission from, Wiley-VCH, Copyright 2010).
Nanomaterials 09 01499 g002
Figure 3. (A) Evolution of the elastic (G’) and viscous modulus (G’’) with frequency for P(AAm-co-AAc), P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP and P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel aqueous dispersions at a single concentration of 5 wt%. (From 10 to 1 Hz measurement was performed under a constant strain of 3% and from 1 to 0.01 Hz under a constant value of 1% strain). (B) Elastic modulus plateau (G’0) represented as a function of AuNP content, for the three different concentration of microgel dispersion: 1, 2, and 5 wt%.
Figure 3. (A) Evolution of the elastic (G’) and viscous modulus (G’’) with frequency for P(AAm-co-AAc), P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP and P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel aqueous dispersions at a single concentration of 5 wt%. (From 10 to 1 Hz measurement was performed under a constant strain of 3% and from 1 to 0.01 Hz under a constant value of 1% strain). (B) Elastic modulus plateau (G’0) represented as a function of AuNP content, for the three different concentration of microgel dispersion: 1, 2, and 5 wt%.
Nanomaterials 09 01499 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of G’ (full symbols) and G’’ (empty symbols) as a function of % strain determined as the strain increases (square) and as the applied strain decreases to the initial state (circle) for (A) P(AAm-co-AAc), (B) P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP and (C) P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel aqueous dispersions at 5 wt% concentration.
Figure 4. Evolution of G’ (full symbols) and G’’ (empty symbols) as a function of % strain determined as the strain increases (square) and as the applied strain decreases to the initial state (circle) for (A) P(AAm-co-AAc), (B) P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP and (C) P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel aqueous dispersions at 5 wt% concentration.
Nanomaterials 09 01499 g004
Figure 5. Strain sweep test corresponding to (A) P(AAm-co-AAc), (B) P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP, and (C) P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel aqueous dispersions at three different concentrations: 1, 2, and 5 wt%.
Figure 5. Strain sweep test corresponding to (A) P(AAm-co-AAc), (B) P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP, and (C) P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP microgel aqueous dispersions at three different concentrations: 1, 2, and 5 wt%.
Nanomaterials 09 01499 g005
Figure 6. Double-logarithmic plot of (A) the elastic modulus plateau, G’0, and (B) critical strain, γ0, as a function of the aqueous microgel concentration for the samples: P(AAm-co-AAc) (black square), P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP (red circle) and P(AAm-co0-AAc)-10% AuNP (green triangle).
Figure 6. Double-logarithmic plot of (A) the elastic modulus plateau, G’0, and (B) critical strain, γ0, as a function of the aqueous microgel concentration for the samples: P(AAm-co-AAc) (black square), P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP (red circle) and P(AAm-co0-AAc)-10% AuNP (green triangle).
Nanomaterials 09 01499 g006
Table 1. Recipe for the synthesis of the hybrid microgels
Table 1. Recipe for the synthesis of the hybrid microgels
AQUEOUS PHASEORGANIC PHASE
AcrylamideAcrylic AcidMBAAuNPDodecaneSpan 80
(Mol)(Mol)(Mol)(%wt)(mL)(g)
P(AAm-co-AAc)0.0562.77 × 10−41.29 × 10−30300.5056
P(AAm-co-AAc)–5% AuNP0.0562.77 × 10−41.29 × 10−35300.5056
P(AAm-co-AAc)–10% AuNP0.0562.77 × 10−41.29 × 10−310300.5056
The volume of water in the aqueous phase is 10 mL. 1 wt% of AMPA-d intitiator was used.
Table 2. Summary of the results obtained by applying Shi et al., and Wu and Morbidelli’s fractal models.
Table 2. Summary of the results obtained by applying Shi et al., and Wu and Morbidelli’s fractal models.
SamplesSlopes (Figure 6A,B)Shih et al.Wu and MorbidelliRegime
ABDfxDfβα
P(AAm-co-AAc)2.56 ± 0.16−0.22 ± 0.17---<02.14 ± 0.282.2 ± 0.50.63 ± 0.17Transition (weak)
P(AAm-co-AAc)-5% AuNP3.82 ± 0.78−0.62 ± 0.22---<02.3 ± 0.72.3 ± 1.20.57 ± 0.38Transition (weak)
P(AAm-co-AAc)-10% AuNP2.29 ± 0.06−1.18 ± 0.131.191.131.2 ± 0.44.14 ± 0.10.04 ± 0.03Strong-link

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Echeverría, C.; Mijangos, C. A Way to Predict Gold Nanoparticles/Polymer Hybrid Microgel Agglomeration Based on Rheological Studies. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101499

AMA Style

Echeverría C, Mijangos C. A Way to Predict Gold Nanoparticles/Polymer Hybrid Microgel Agglomeration Based on Rheological Studies. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(10):1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Echeverría, Coro, and Carmen Mijangos. 2019. "A Way to Predict Gold Nanoparticles/Polymer Hybrid Microgel Agglomeration Based on Rheological Studies" Nanomaterials 9, no. 10: 1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop