Next Article in Journal
Facile Synthesis of FeS@C Particles Toward High-Performance Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Protective Coatings Based on Nanoparticle fullerene C60 for Oil & Gas Pipeline Corrosion Mitigation
Previous Article in Journal
MPI Phantom Study with A High-Performing Multicore Tracer Made by Coprecipitation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Nanocomposites Based on Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles and Polyacrylamide: Preparation and Complex Characterization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/nano9101465
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bi1−xEuxFeO3 Powders: Synthesis, Characterization, Magnetic and Photoluminescence Properties

by
Vasile-Adrian Surdu
1,
Roxana Doina Trușcă
1,
Bogdan Ștefan Vasile
1,*,
Ovidiu Cristian Oprea
2,
Eugenia Tanasă
1,
Lucian Diamandescu
3,
Ecaterina Andronescu
1 and
Adelina Carmen Ianculescu
1,*
1
Department of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, “Politehnica” University of Bucharest, Gh. Polizu Street no. 1-7, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, “Politehnica” University of Bucharest, Gh. Polizu Street no. 1-7, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
3
National Institute of Materials Physics, 077125 Bucharest-Măgurele, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(10), 1465; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101465
Submission received: 23 September 2019 / Revised: 11 October 2019 / Accepted: 12 October 2019 / Published: 16 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis, Processing and Application of Micro and Nanostructured Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Europium substituted bismuth ferrite powders were synthesized by the sol-gel technique. The precursor xerogel was characterized by thermal analysis. Bi1−xEuxFeO3 (x = 0–0.20) powders obtained after thermal treatment of the xerogel at 600 °C for 30 min were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, and Mössbauer spectroscopy. Magnetic behavior at room temperature was tested using vibrating sample magnetometry. The comparative results showed that europium has a beneficial effect on the stabilization of the perovskite structure and induced a weak ferromagnetism. The particle size decreases after the introduction of Eu3+ from 167 nm for x = 0 to 51 nm for x = 0.20. Photoluminescence spectroscopy showed the enhancement of the characteristic emission peaks intensity with the increase of Eu3+ concentration.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among various multiferroic compounds, bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) stands out because it is one of the few magnetic ferroelectrics at room temperature. Therefore, there has been intensive research in the past decades to make it useful in practical applications. There are certain issues that are still open in what concerns voltage-induced changes, the possibility of reading magnetic data or the mechanism of magnetoelectric coupling, and whether it may be controlled [1]. Besides, extensive studies search for the possibility of using BiFeO3 based materials for applications such as actuators, transducers, magnetic field sensors, information storage devices, optical imaging, photocatalysis, or gas sensors [2,3,4,5,6]. Recently, BiFeO3 nanopowders were found to exhibit catalytic activity for doxorubicine degradation [7].
The antiferromagnetic structure in BiFeO3 is quite complex, usually being considered as a G-type with a spiral spin arrangement (about 62 nm wavelength), due to the interplay between exchange and spin-orbit coupling interactions involving Fe ions. There are several strategies to enhance its magnetic properties, including chemical modifications, or control of morphology and structure. In terms of morphologies, BiFeO3-based nanostructures exhibit increased magnetization than the corresponding bulks, due to the perturbation of the helimagnetic order by structural peculiarities (e.g., local defects) or the specific size of nanoparticles [8,9,10,11,12].
Another way to modify the magnetic structure consists in replacing Bi by rare earth ions, based on the fact that in the perovskite-like structure, the superexchange interaction between the localized RE4f and Fe3d electrons may play an important role. The effect of several rare-earth dopants/solutes, as Ho [13,14], Sm [15,16], La [17,18], Dy [19], Gd [20], or Nd [21] on the properties of bismuth ferrite have been investigated. There are some works which described the effect of Eu3+ used as A site solute on the characteristics of bismuth ferrite powders prepared by various non-conventional techniques, such as hydrothermal process [22], ball milling [23], or different variants of the sol-gel methods [24,25,26], etc. Even if the magnetic behavior of these powders was extensively analyzed, however no data regarding other properties as photoluminescence were reported.
The aim of this work is to study the influence of europium addition on the phase purity, crystal structure, morphology, magnetic behavior, and optical properties of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders (x = 0; 0.05; 0.10; 0.15; 0.20) prepared by the sol-gel route. In order to be able to assess only the contribution of Eu substitution on the A-site of the perovskite structure, all the processing parameters were constantly maintained.

2. Materials and Methods

Synthesis of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders (x = 0; 0.05; 0.10; 0.15; 0.20) was carried out through sol-gel route. All the solvents and chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. The precursor solution was prepared by dissolution of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA ≥98%), Eu(NO3)3·5H2O (Sigma Aldrich, 99.9%) and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Aldrich, 99.99%) in stoichiometric ratios in acetic acid solution (Honeywell Fluka, Wabash, IN, USA ACS Reagent, ≥99.7%). A transparent brownish red sol resulted after the complete dissolution (≈ 1 h) of the nitrates. The sol was stabilized with 2-methoxyetanol which was added in a 1:1 volume ratio with respect to acetic acid. The amounts of precursors are summarized in Table 1. After 1 h mixing at 400 rpm, the temperature was set to 80 °C and the sol was kept under magnetic stirring at this temperature for 12 h until a gel was obtained. Gel drying was carried out in a forced convection oven (Memmert Universal Oven U, Schwabach, Germany) in air at 120 °C for 12 h to obtain the xerogels. The precursor powders were heat treated in air at 600 °C with a soaking time of 30 min, a heating rate of 5 °C/min and then were slowly cooled at the normal rate of the oven (CWF 1200, Carbolite Gero, Hope Valley, England).
Thermal behavior of the precursor powders was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry–thermogravimetry (DSC-TG) analyses carried out with a TG 449C STA Jupiter (Netzsch, Selb, Germany) thermal analyzer. Samples were placed in alumina crucible and heated with 10 °C/min from room temperature to 900°, under dried air flow of 20 mL/min.
Room temperature X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed to investigate the phase purity and structure of the (Bi,Eu)FeO3 powders. For this purpose, an Empyrean diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands), using Ni-filtered Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) with a scan step increment of 0.02° and a counting time of 255 s/step, for 2θ ranged between 20–80°was used. Lattice parameters were refined by the Rietveld method [27], using the HighScore Plus 3.0e software (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands). After removing the instrumental contribution, the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peaks can be interpreted in terms of crystallite size and lattice strain. A pseudo-Voigt function was used to refine the shapes of the BiFeO3 peaks.
The local order and the cation coordination in the calcined powders were studied by Raman spectroscopy carried out at room temperature, using a LabRAm HR Evolution spectrometer (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). Raman spectra were recorded using the 514 nm line of an argon ion laser, by focusing a 125 mW beam of a few micrometer sized spots on the samples under investigation.
Mössbauer spectroscopy ICE Oxford Mössbauer cryomagnetic system (WissEL, Mömbris, Germany) was used to analyze the state of iron ions in the perovskite lattice. The system was equipped with a 10 mCi 57Co(Rh) source and the velocity was calibrated using a α-Fe standard foil.
Morphology and crystallinity degree of the (Bi,Eu)FeO3 particles were investigated by scanning electron microscopy operated at 30 kV (Inspect F50, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscopy operated at 300 kV (TecnaiTM G2 F30 S-TWIN, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The average particle size of the (Bi,Eu)FeO3 powders was estimated from the particle size distributions, which were determined using the OriginPro 9.0 software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) by taking into account size measurements on ~100 particles performed by means of the software of the electron microscopes (ImageJ 1.50b, National Institutes of Health and the Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, Madison, WI, USA) in the case of SEM, and Digital Micrograph 1.8.0 (Gatan, Sarasota, FL, USA) in the case of transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Vibrating sample magnetometry (7404-s VSM, LakeShore, Westerville, OH, USA) was used in order to investigate the magnetic behavior of the processed powders. Hysteresis loops were recorded at room temperature with an applied field up to 15 kOe, with increments of 200 Oe and a ramp rate of 20 Oe/s.
The fluorescence spectra were recorded with a LS 55 spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) using an Xe lamp as a UV light source, at ambient temperature, in the range 350–650 nm, with all the samples in solid state. The measurements were made with a scan speed of 200 nm/min, excitation and emission slits of 10 nm, and a cut-off filter of 350 nm. An excitation wavelength of 320 nm was used.

3. Results

3.1. Thermal Behavior of the Precursor Powders

The TG-DSC curves of the Bi1−xEuxFeO3 xerogels are shown in Figure 1. The peaks corresponding to the exothermic effects and associated mass loss are illustrated in Table 2.
Thermal analysis reveals four step decomposition in the case of (Bi,Eu)FeO3 powders with x = 0, x = 0.05, x = 0.10, and five step decomposition for the samples with x = 0.15 and x = 0.20. The first step decomposition at 103–108° was attributed to dehydration of the xerogels.
The second decomposition step (110–230 °C) associated with exothermic reactions with the highest mass loss, between 18.2% and 26.5% for the selected compositions, correspond to decarboxylation of acetic acid and decomposition of small groups such as NO3−. For the powders with x = 0.15 and x = 0.20, this reaction takes place in two steps, one at 206.7 °C and 208.7 °C, respectively, and the other at 239.2 °C and 240.3 °C, respectively [28].
The exothermic effect at 270–282 °C could be assigned to the collapse of the gel network and combustion of most organic materials. A small weight loss ≈2.5% occurring up to 430 °C corresponds to the end of CO2 release [28].

3.2. Phase Composition and Structure of the (Bi,Eu)FeO3 Powders

The room-temperature XRD patterns of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders are illustrated in Figure 2. The profiles of the peaks indicate a high crystallinity. A rhombohedral perovskite structure with space group R3c was indexed for the powders with x ≤ 0.10 [23]. A small amount of Bi25FeO40 sillenite phase is also detected for these compositions. Upon increasing the substitution ratio, the secondary phase diminishes until vanishing, which proves the beneficial effect of Eu3+ in what concerns the stabilization of the perovskite phase. All the reflections corresponding to the major perovskite phase are shifted to higher values of the diffraction angle when x is increased. Besides, in the case of the compositions with x ≥ 0.15 it may be observed that the (012) peak is split and a supplementary interference occurs at 2θ ≈ 34°. These are arguments that suggest Eu3+ ions have substituted Bi3+ in the BiFeO3 lattice and that a phase transition from rhombohedral R3c (α phase) to orthorhombic Pnma (β phase) crystal symmetry has occurred [29,30].
Rietveld refinement was performed in order to accurately determine the phase composition and structure of the powders. For the specimens with x ≥ 0.15, the best fit to data was obtained when using a mixture of rhombohedral R3c and orthorhombic Pnma polymorphs. The quality of the fits is indicated by the agreement indices obtained from Rietveld refinement (Table 3).
The phase composition evolution versus Eu3+ substitution degree is shown in Figure 3. For x ≥ 0.15, the Bi25FeO40 secondary phase vanishes in the limit of detection of X-ray diffraction. Stabilization of the perovskite phase is also accompanied by rapid polymorph transition. When increasing x from 0.10 to 0.15, phase composition changes from 97.4% R3c bismuth ferrite and 2.6% sillenite in the secondary phase to 62% R3c bismuth ferrite polymorph and 40% Pnma bismuth ferrite polymorph, respectively. These results are in good agreement with those reported by Iorgu et al. [31] and Khomchenko et al. [32] who also found a second orthorhombic polymorph in their Eu-substituted bismuth ferrite, with x ≥ 0.10 obtained by combustion method and solid state reaction, respectively.
Unit cell parameters and cell volume (Figure 4) decrease with the increasing amount of Eu solute. This, together with the phase transition, is supported most likely by the smaller ionic radius of Eu3+ (1.07 Å) than that of Bi3+ (1.17 Å) [33].
As expected, the formation of (Bi,Eu)FeO3 solid solutions drives to the decrease of the crystallite size and the concurrent increase of the internal microstrains (Figure 5).
Raman spectroscopy is a powerful technique, which is sensitive to structural phase transitions and it has been carried out to further support the Rietveld analysis of the XRD patterns. The active Raman modes of the BiFeO3 solid solutions with rhombohedral R3c structure may be summarized using the irreducible representation of ΓRaman, R3c = 4A1 + 9E [34,35,36].
In the present study, for the powders with lower Eu content (x ≤ 0.10), the modes A1-1 and A1-2, attributed to Bi-O bonds shift to higher-frequency region. This may be explained by the partial substitution of Bi3+ with Eu3+ because the frequency of the mode is inversely proportional to the mass, M, at A-site. Since the mass of Eu is about 27% lower than the mass of Bi, substitution will induce the shift in the frequency of vibration of the modes, which is consistent to the data presented in Figure 6. When x increases from 0.10 to 0.15, the most significant feature in the Raman spectra is that A1-1 and A1-2 modes almost vanish and severely broaden, while the E mode at ≈290 cm−1 shifts to a higher frequency and increases in intensity. Such peak has been reported for orthorhombic rare earth ferrites and can be assigned to Ag mode [37]. The further increase of x from 0.15 to 0.20 indicate a visible distortion of FeO6 octahedra, which is evidenced by the increase of intensity of the 500 and 600 cm−1 modes [38]. All the discussed features are arguments that Eu3+ is incorporated on the Bi site of the perovskite lattice of BiFeO3 forming solid solutions, and that when the substitution degree exceeds the value of 0.15, using the processing parameters in the present work, it induces a structural phase transition from rhombohedral to orthorhombic symmetry.
The 57Fe Mössbauer spectra for the selected compositions with x = 0 and x = 0.20 were recorded at room temperature. Results show that the spectra corresponding to the investigated samples present hyperfine magnetic sextet (Figure 7).
The refining of the spectra under the assumption of the Lorentzian shape of the Mössbauer line allowed obtaining of the characteristic parameters: isomeric shift (IS), quadrupole splitting (ΔEq) and hyperfine field (Hhf), which are presented in Table 4.
The values of IS and ΔEq prove that Fe occupies only the B-site in the perovskite structure and correspond to high-spin Fe3+ ions.
Upon introduction of Eu3+ in the lattice, ΔEq switches from positive values (0.179 mm/s) in the case of x = 0 to negative values (−0.054 mm/s) in the case of x = 0.20. This means that the electric field gradient is drastically changed by the substitution and may be assigned to structural phase transition from rhombohedral to orthorhombic symmetry, as seen for Bi1−xDyxFeO3 nanoparticles obtained by Qian et al. [39]
In what concerns the Hhf, the substitution of Bi3+ with Eu3+ does not affect the obtained values nor the charge density reflected in the IS parameter which remains constant. All Mössbauer parameters are in good agreement with those obtained by Prado-Gonjal et al. for microwave-assisted hydrothermal processed BiFeO3 powders [40].

3.3. Morphology

Scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images depicting the morphology and the particle size distribution of the calcined (Bi,Eu)FeO3 powders are shown in Figure 8. A general view of two selected compositions, x = 0 (Figure 8a) and x = 0.10 (Figure 8b), illustrate porous networks with pores in the micrometer and submicrometer range, which were formed after heat treatment of the precursor gels. The walls of the pores are dense and consist of agglomerated particles as it may be seen in the detail in the images of Figure 8c,e,g,i,k. In each case, the particles exhibit polyhedral shapes and as x increases the particles tend to have a more rounded aspect. Moreover, for ternary compositions, a tendency toward coarsening was observed. In what concerns the particle size, one can see a decrease after the introduction of Eu3+ as a substituent in the perovskite lattice from 167 nm for x = 0 to 85 nm for x = 0.05, which becomes even more evident for the compositions where the polymorphic transformation occurs (x = 0.15 and x = 0.20). In the latter case, the particle size decreases from 78 nm for x = 0.10 to 56 nm for x = 0.15. This kind of effect is consistent with other studies regarding substituted BiFeO3 particles prepared by various techniques [24,26,31,41]. Moreover, Dai et al. explained this in the case of (Eu, Ti) co-substituted ceramics as a result of suppression of oxygen vacancies by the solutes, which slows oxygen ion motion and, consequently, grain growth rate [42]. The particle size distribution is unimodal (Figure 8d,f,h,j,l) and becomes narrower as the solute concentration increases. Thus, in the BiFeO3 sample, the unimodal distribution show 20%–25% of nanoparticles in the size range of 140–180 nm. Besides, the influence of the addition of Eu3+ on the size and particle size distribution should be noted. The introduction of 5% Eu3+ results in the particle size distribution shown in Figure 8f. The entire particle size distribution is between 50 and 120 nm, with a maxima at 80–90 nm, which represents a proportion of 35%. Actually, all the nanoparticles present sizes below those characteristic to BiFeO3 (80–280 nm). The slowing particle growth effect of europium is better observed when its concentration in the perovskite solid solution increases. Thus, for x = 0.10, even if 30% of the nanoparticles correspond to the size range of 80–90 nm, the unimodal distribution is asymmetric due to the increase of the ratio of nanoparticles in the range size of 50–80 nm. More obvious contribution of the solute is shown in the case of x = 0.15 and x = 0.20, where one can observe that 35%–40% of the nanoparticles are in the size range of 50–60 nm and, respectively, 40–60 nm. The measurements of the sizes and the corresponding distributions from FE-SEM data illustrate a clear influence of the Eu3+ solute on the reduction of the particles size, as well as on the narrowing of the particle size distribution with the increase of the substitution rate.
TEM investigations sustain FE-SEM observations. The coarsening of the particles is observed better in Bright-field TEM images (Figure 9a,e,i,m,q) by means of necks at the particles limits. Particle size distributions (Figure 9b,f,j,n,r) are similar to those measured from FE-SEM images, as the small differences are in the limits of the standard deviation. Morphology evolution with increasing Eu3+ solute degree is similar to that reported by Bahraoui et al. who synthetized Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders by the sol-gel method with calcination treatment at 500 °C for 24 h, but the average particle size is almost four times higher [26]. This shows that although the time of heat treatment at 600 °C was relatively short (30 min), the temperature has a stronger influence on the particle size growth.
The powders show a high crystallinity degree as assessed from the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns (Figure 9c,g,k,o,s), which consist of well-defined diffraction spots arranged in concentric diffraction rings. For the pure BiFeO3 powder (x = 0), the diffraction rings are less visible due to the fact that both crystallite size and particle size are situated in the submicrometer scale and because the coarsening process may induce some preferential orientations of the aggregated particles. In the case of the samples with higher Eu3+ content (x = 0.15 and x = 0.20), the patterns are more complicated because of the coexistence of rhombohedral and orthorhombic polymorphs which are homogeneously distributed.
High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) investigations reveal long-range highly ordered fringes with spacing at 2.28 Å and 1.77 Å corresponding to the (2 0 2) and (1 1 6) crystalline planes of the rhombohedrally-distorted perovskite structure in the case of x = 0. For x = 0.05 and x = 0.10, there were also identified the crystallographic planes specific to rhombohedral polymorphs (Figure 9f,h). In the case of x = 0.20, both polymorphs were identified in the same particles consisting of multiple crystallites. It is worth mentioning that the substitution also induces the forming of polycrystalline particles, which is also evidenced in the HR-TEM images.
In order to have a better understanding of the nature of the particles, in Figure 10 a comparison between average crystallite size determined from XRD data and average particle size measured on SEM and TEM images was depicted. In the case of unsubstituted BiFeO3 particles, the three values are almost equal. Slightly differences that occur are in the range of standard deviation. This means that in this case, the particles are single crystals. Interestingly, when comparing the values obtained for Eu-substituted BiFeO3 compositions, one can observe that the values for the average nanoparticle size determined from SEM and TEM investigations are very close, whereas the average crystallite size presents at most a half value of the average particle size, proving that for x ≥ 0.05, the particles are polycrystalline and consist of two or more crystallites, which sustains the HR-TEM observations.

3.4. Magnetic Behavior

Figure 11 and Table 5 show the room-temperature M = f(H) hysteresis loops up to 15,000 Oe, and Ms, Mr, and Hc parameters of the Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders.
It can be observed that the sample with x = 0 shows a continuous linear increase of magnetization versus magnetic field which suggests the presence of the antiferromagnetic phase, involving relative low exchange integrals in order to progressively reorient the spins along the field direction.
However, at very low fields, there is a much faster variation of saturation magnetization of 0.3529 emu/g and a coercive field of 51.290 Oe. Unlike this sample, in the case of the samples with 0.05 ≤ x ≤ 0.15, a weak ferromagnetic behavior, with a saturation magnetization of 1.6570 emu/g for x = 0.05, 1.1089 emu/g for x = 0.10 and 0.7113 emu/g for x = 0.15 is present. A possible conclusion of these aspects is that Eu content influences the spin spiral structure, most likely by a perturbation of the superexchange interactions between localized Eu4f and Fe3d electrons.
At the maximum substitution degree studied in this work, the magnetic behavior shows a decrease in Ms, Mr, and Hc compared to pristine BiFeO3 particles, suggesting that increasing Eu content above x = 0.15 does not improve the magnetic behavior of the particles. This suggests that the presence of the orthorhombic Pnma polymorph affects the magnetic order.

3.5. Photoluminescence Properties

BiFeO3 is an interesting optical material, which shows promising applications in photocatalysts and photoconductive devices. Thus, photoluminescence spectroscopy was used to study the optical property of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 nanoparticles.
During synthesis there are generated several deep and shallow oxygen vacancies and surface defects that introduce localized electronic levels in-band [43]. Therefore, the PL spectra (Figure 12) are complex and present more than a single peak from band-to-band transition.
The most intense blue emission peak at the wavelength of 455 nm (2.72 eV) originates from self-activated centers in the synthesized nanoparticles [44,45]. The emission peak is broad and asymmetric, with a clear overlap with the peak from 479 nm (2.58 eV). This indicate the existence of another transition below the conduction band, due to the presence of defects in grain boundaries or oxygen vacancies, usually referred as near-band edge (NBE) transition [45,46,47].
In the blue-green region there are further shoulders at the 511–524 nm range which can be attributed to oxygen vacancies and a small, but broad peak in the range of 569–584 nm which has an unknown origin [48]. These peaks are usually referred as defect-level emissions (DLE).
The intensity of emission peaks increases with the increase of the solute content from the Eu3+-doped BiFeO3 with x = 0.05 to x = 0.20. This behavior cannot be explained in terms of the difference in nanoparticles dimensions, taking into account that the 5% and 10%-doped samples, as well as the 15% and 20%-doped powders exhibit roughly similar sizes.
In the first instance, for 5% Eu3+-doped sample, the photo-generated electron-hole pairs present a lower recombination rate, which leads to lower intensity of emission peaks. For the next three samples the increase of luminescent emission with the europium amount could be related to a higher concentration of surface defects as new crystalline phase is formed. These defects can contribute to the capture of photo-generated electrons, to produce excitons, which will enhance the emission intensity. A similar behavior was reported for Sn4+/Gd3+ or Mn2+-doped BiFeO3 samples [49,50].
In the 550–650 nm range there are no peaks that can be assigned to Eu3+ ions emission spectrum, indicating either a masking effect from BiFeO3 luminescence or, simply, a quenching of europium fluorescence. This effect was also observed for other rare earth ions used as soluted for bismuth ferrite [49,51,52].

4. Conclusions

Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders were prepared by the sol-gel method. XRD and Raman spectroscopy investigations indicated phase-pure particles and a structural phase transition for x ≥ 0.15 when using the processing parameters presented in the present work. Mössbauer spectroscopy showed only the presence of Fe3+ and a hyperfine magnetic sextet. FE-SEM and TEM analysis evidenced obtaining submicron-sized single-crystal particles for pure BiFeO3 composition, and polycrystalline nanoparticles in the case of Eu3+-substituted powders. The most pronounced ferromagnetic behavior was observed for Bi0.95Eu0.05FeO3 composition, which exhibited a saturation magnetization of 1.65 emu/g and a coercitive field of 100 Oe, which occurs, most likely, by a perturbation of the superexchange interactions between localized Eu4f and Fe3d electrons. This work shows a possibility to tailor magnetic behavior of bismuth ferrite using rare earth metal solute on the A-site of the perovskite structure. The luminescence emission increases with the increase of the Eu3+ content, but the quenching of the fluorescence specific to europium ions seems to be induced by a masking effect of BiFeO3, as in other rare-earth doped bismuth ferrite systems.

Author Contributions

The authors contributions are as follows: methodology, V.-A.S. and A.C.I.; investigation, O.C.O., E.T., and L.D.; data curation, V.-A.S., R.D.T., and B.Ș.V.; formal analysis, A.C.I.; writing—original draft preparation V. -A.S.; writing—review and editing, E.A. and A.C.I.; visualization, B.Ș.V. and A.C.I.

Funding

This research was funded by Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI, Project No. PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0072.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Catalan, G.; Scott, J.F. Physics and applications of bismuth ferrite. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2463–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Clarke, G.; Rogov, A.; McCarthy, S.; Bonacina, L.; Gun’Ko, Y.; Galez, C.; le Dantec, R.; Volkov, Y.; Mugnier, Y.; Prina-Mello, A. Preparation from a revisited wet chemical route of phase-pure, monocrystalline and SHG-efficient BiFeO3 nanoparticles for harmonic bio-imaging. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Haruna, A.; Abdulkadir, I.; Idris, S.O. Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic properties of Bi0.85−XMXBa0.15FeO3 (M = Na and K, X = 0, 0.1) perovskite-like nanoparticles using the sol-gel method. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramos-Gomes, F.; Möbius, W.; Bonacina, L.; Alves, F.; Markus, M.A. Bismuth ferrite second harmonic nanoparticles for pulmonary macrophage tracking. Small 2019, 15, 1803776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chakraborty, S.; Pal, M. Highly selective and stable acetone sensor based on chemically prepared bismuth ferrite nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 787, 1204–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sinha, A.K.; Bhushan, B.; Mishra, S.K.; Sharma, R.K.; Sen, S.; Mandal, B.P.; Meena, S.S.; Bhatt, P.; Prajapat, C.L.; Priyam, A.; et al. Enhanced dielectric, magnetic and optical properties of Cr-doped BiFeO3 multiferroic nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel route. Results Phys. 2019, 13, 102299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dumitru, R.; Ianculescu, A.; Păcurariu, C.; Lupa, L.; Pop, A.; Vasile, B.; Surdu, A.; Manea, F. BiFeO3-synthesis, characterization and its photocatalytic activity towards doxorubicin degradation from water. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 2789–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Philip, G.G.; Senthamizhan, A.; Natarajan, T.S.; Chandrasekaran, G.; Therese, H.A. The effect of gadolinium doping on the structural, magnetic and photoluminescence properties of electrospun bismuth ferrite nanofibers. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 13361–13365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Godara, S.; Sinha, N.; Kumar, B. Enhanced electric and magnetic properties in Ce-Cr co-doped bismuth ferrite nanostructure. Mater. Lett. 2014, 136, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dutta, D.P.; Mandal, B.P.; Mukadam, M.D.; Yusuf, S.M.; Tyagi, A.K. Improved magnetic and ferroelectric properties of Sc and Ti codoped multiferroic nano BiFeO3 prepared via sonochemical synthesis. Dalt. Trans. 2014, 43, 7838–7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chaudhuri, A.; Mandal, K. Study of structural, ferromagnetic and ferroelectric properties of nanostructured barium doped Bismuth Ferrite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2014, 353, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, F.; Wang, Z.; Lu, X.; Zhang, J.; Min, K.; Lin, W.; Ti, R.; Xu, T.; He, J.; Yue, C.; et al. Peculiar magnetism of BiFeO3 nanoparticles with size approaching the period of the spiral spin structure. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qi, J.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wei, M.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J. Structural, magnetic and impedance spectroscopy properties of Ho3+ modified BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 2942–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Muneeswaran, M.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, D.H.; Jung, B.S.; Chang, S.H.; Jang, J.W.; Choi, B.C.; Jeong, J.H.; Giridharan, N.V.; Venkateswaran, C. Structural, vibrational, and enhanced magneto-electric coupling in Ho-substituted BiFeO3. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 750, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, X.; Guoqiang, T.; Huijun, R.; Ao, X. Structural, electric and multiferroic properties of Sm-doped BiFeO3 thin films prepared by the sol-gelprocess. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 6223–6228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yotburut, B.; Thongbai, P.; Yamwong, T.; Maensiri, S. Synthesis and characterization of multiferroic Sm-doped BiFeO3 nanopowders and their bulk dielectric properties. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 437, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reddy, B.P.; Sekhar, M.C.; Prakash, B.P.; Suh, Y.; Park, S.H. Photocatalytic, magnetic, and electrochemical properties of La doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 19512–19521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Castillo, M.E.; Shvartsman, V.V.; Gobeljic, D.; Gao, Y.; Landers, J.; Wende, H.; Lupascu, D.C. Effect of particle size on ferroelectric and magnetic properties of BiFeO3 nanopowders. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 355701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dhir, G.; Uniyal, P.; Verma, N.K. Effect of particle size on magnetic and dielectric properties of nanoscale Dy-doped BiFeO3. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2014, 27, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vijayasundaram, S.V.; Suresh, G.; Mondal, R.A.; Kanagadurai, R. Composition-driven enhanced magnetic properties and magnetoelectric coupling in Gd substituted BiFeO3 nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 418, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.; Liu, W.F.; Wu, P.; Hai, X.; Wang, S.Y.; Liu, G.Y.; Rao, G.H. Unusual magnetic behaviors and electrical properties of Nd-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles calcined at different temperatures. J. Nanopart. Res. 2014, 16, 2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.; Zhu, Z.; Yin, X.; Wang, F.; Gu, W.; Fu, Z.; Lu, Y. Enhanced magnetism and light absorption of Eu-doped BiFeO3. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 7079–7083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Freitas, V.F.; Grande, H.L.C.; de Medeiros, S.N.; Santos, I.A.; Cótica, L.F.; Coelho, A.A. Structural, microstructural and magnetic investigations in high-energy ball milled BiFeO3 and Bi0.95Eu0.05FeO3 powders. J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 461, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Reshak, A.H.; Tlemçani, T.S.; Bahraoui, T.E.; Taibi, M.; Plucinski, K.J.; Belayachi, A.; Abd-Lefdil, M.; Lis, M.; Alahmed, Z.A.; Kamarudin, H.; et al. Characterization of multiferroic Bi0.8RE0.2FeO3powders (RE=Nd3+, Eu3+) grown by the sol-gel method. Mater. Lett. 2015, 139, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.; Fang, L.; Zheng, F.; Ju, S.; Shen, M. Enhancement of magnetization in Eu doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 022511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bahraoui, T.E.; Tlemçani, T.S.; Taibi, M.; Zaarour, H.; Bey, A.E.; Belayachi, A.; Silver, A.T.; Schmerber, G.; Naggar, A.M.E.; Albassam, A.A.; et al. Characterization of multiferroic Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders prepared by sol-gel method. Mater. Lett. 2016, 182, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rietveld, H.M. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1969, 2, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, J.; Ke, H.; Jia, D.; Wang, W.; Zhou, Y. Low-temperature synthesis of BiFeO3 nanopowders via a sol—gel method. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009, 472, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Troyanchuk, I.O.; Bushinsky, M.V.; Karpinsky, D.V.; Mantytskaya, O.S.; Fedotova, V.V.; Prochnenko, O.I. Structural transformations and magnetic properties of Bi1-xLnxFeO3 (Ln = La, Nd, Eu) multiferroics. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. 2009, 246, 1901–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ravindran, P.; Vidya, R.; Kjekshus, A.; Fjellvåg, H.; Eriksson, O. Theoretical investigation of magnetoelectric behavior in BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 224412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iorgu, A.I.; Maxim, F.; Matei, C.; Ferreira, L.P.; Ferreira, P.; Cruz, M.M.; Berger, D. Fast synthesis of rare-earth (Pr3+, Sm3+, Eu3+ and Gd3+) doped bismuth ferrite powders with enhanced magnetic properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 629, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khomchenko, V.A.; Troyanchuk, I.O.; Bushinsky, M.V.; Mantytskaya, O.S.; Sikolenko, V.; Paixão, J.A. Structural phase evolution in Bi7/8Ln1/8FeO3 (Ln = La–Dy) series. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1970–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rao, T.D.; Karthik, T.; Asthana, S. Investigation of structural, magnetic and optical properties of rare earth substituted bismuth ferrite. J. Rare Earths 2013, 31, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fukumura, H.; Harima, H.; Kisoda, K.; Tamada, M.; Noguchi, Y.; Miyayama, M. Raman scattering study of multiferroic BiFeO3 single crystal. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 310, 2006–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kothari, D.; Reddy, V.R.; Sathe, V.G.; Gupta, A.; Banerjee, A.; Awasthi, A.M. Raman scattering study of polycrystalline magnetoelectric BiFeO3. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2008, 320, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gupta, H.C.; Singh, M.K.; Tiwari, L.M. A lattice dynamical investigation of Raman and infrared wavenumbers at the zone center of the orthorhombic NdNiO3 perovskite. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2003, 64, 531–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sati, P.C.; Kumar, M.; Chhoker, S.; Jewariya, M. Influence of Eu substitution on structural, magnetic, optical and dielectric properties of BiFeO3 multiferroic ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 2389–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qian, F.Z.; Jiang, J.S.; Guo, S.Z.; Jiang, D.M.; Zhang, W.G. Multiferroic properties of Bi1-xDyxFeO3 nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 084312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prado-Gonjal, J.; Ávila, D.; Villafuerte-Castrejón, M.E.; González-García, F.; Fuentes, L.; Gómez, R.W.; Pérez-Mazariego, J.L.; Marquina, V.; Morán, E. Structural, microstructural and Mössbauer study of BiFeO3 synthesized at low temperature by a microwave-hydrothermal method. Solid State Sci. 2011, 13, 2030–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, Y.; Quan, C.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Q.; Mao, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Min, Y.; Yang, J.; Li, X.; et al. Effect of Eu, Mn co-doping on structural, optical and magnetic properties of BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2017, 57, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dai, H.; Xue, R.; Chen, Z.; Li, T.; Chen, J.; Xiang, H. Effect of Eu, Ti co-doping on the structural and multiferroic properties of BiFeO3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 15617–15622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pandey, D.K.; Modi, A.; Pandey, P.; Gaur, N.K. Variable excitation wavelength photoluminescence response and optical absorption in BiFeO3 nanostructures. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 17245–17253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yu, X.; An, X. Enhanced magnetic and optical properties of pure and (Mn, Sr) doped BiFeO3 nanocrystals. Solid State Commun. 2009, 149, 711–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Moubah, R.; Schmerber, G.; Rousseau, O.; Colson, D.; Viret, M. Photoluminescence investigation of defects and optical band gap in multiferroic BiFeO3 single crystals. Appl. Phys. Express 2012, 5, 035802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, T.; Wang, F.; Shi, W. Optical and photoluminescence properties of BiFeO3 thin films grown on ITO-coated glass substrates by chemical solution deposition. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 2012, 209, 1456–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Prashanthi, K.; Gupta, M.; Tsui, Y.Y.; Thundat, T. Effect of annealing atmosphere on microstructural and photoluminescence characteristics of multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition technique. Appl. Phys. A 2013, 110, 903–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hauser, A.J.; Zhang, J.; Mier, L.; Ricciardo, R.A.; Woodward, P.M.; Gustafson, T.L.; Brillson, L.J.; Yang, F.Y. Characterization of electronic structure and defect states of thin epitaxial BiFeO3 films by UV-visible absorption and cathodoluminescence spectroscopies. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 222901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Irfan, S.; Rizwan, S.; Shen, Y.; Li, L.; Asfandiyar; Butt, S.; Nan, C.W. The Gadolinium (Gd3+) and Tin (Sn4+) Co-doped BiFeO3 Nanoparticles as New Solar Light Active Photocatalyst. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chauhan, S.; Kumar, M.; Chhoker, S.; Katyal, S.C.; Singh, H.; Jewariya, M.; Yadav, K.L. Multiferroic, magnetoelectric and optical properties of Mn doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Solid State Commun. 2012, 152, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Das, R.; Khan, G.G.; Varma, S.; Mukherjee, G.D.; Mandal, K. Effect of quantum confinement on optical and magnetic properties of Pr—Cr-codoped bismuth ferrite nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 39, 20209–20216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kumar, K.S.; Ramanadha, M.; Sudharani, A.; Ramu, S.; Vijayalakshmi, R.P. Structural, magnetic, and photoluminescence properties of BiFeO3: Er-doped nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel technique. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2019, 32, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and (b) thermogravimetry (TG) curves of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 xerogels.
Figure 1. (a) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and (b) thermogravimetry (TG) curves of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 xerogels.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g001
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g002a 550Nanomaterials 09 01465 g002b 550
Figure 2. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders, (b,c) Rietveld refined patterns for x = 0.05 and x = 0.20.
Figure 2. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders, (b,c) Rietveld refined patterns for x = 0.05 and x = 0.20.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g002aNanomaterials 09 01465 g002b
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g003 550
Figure 3. Phase composition evolution in Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Figure 3. Phase composition evolution in Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g003
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Unit cell parameters corresponding to R3c polymorph, and (b) unit cell volume for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Figure 4. (a) Unit cell parameters corresponding to R3c polymorph, and (b) unit cell volume for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g004
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g005 550
Figure 5. Average crystallite size and lattice microstrain for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Figure 5. Average crystallite size and lattice microstrain for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g005
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g006 550
Figure 6. Typical Raman scattering spectra of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Figure 6. Typical Raman scattering spectra of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g006
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g007 550
Figure 7. Room temperature 57Fe Mössbauer spectra of powders with x = 0 and x = 0.20.
Figure 7. Room temperature 57Fe Mössbauer spectra of powders with x = 0 and x = 0.20.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g007
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g008a 550Nanomaterials 09 01465 g008b 550Nanomaterials 09 01465 g008c 550
Figure 8. FE-SEM images showing the morphology and corresponding histograms for particle size distribution of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders: (a,b) General view for x = 0 and x = 0.10, (c,d) x = 0: (c) detail, (d) particle size distribution, (e,f) x = 0.05: (e) detail, (f) particle size distribution, (g,h) x = 0.10: (g) detail, (h) particle size distribution, (i,j) x = 0.15: (i) detail, (j) particle size distribution, (k,l) x = 0.20: (k) detail, (l) particle size distribution,.
Figure 8. FE-SEM images showing the morphology and corresponding histograms for particle size distribution of Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders: (a,b) General view for x = 0 and x = 0.10, (c,d) x = 0: (c) detail, (d) particle size distribution, (e,f) x = 0.05: (e) detail, (f) particle size distribution, (g,h) x = 0.10: (g) detail, (h) particle size distribution, (i,j) x = 0.15: (i) detail, (j) particle size distribution, (k,l) x = 0.20: (k) detail, (l) particle size distribution,.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g008aNanomaterials 09 01465 g008bNanomaterials 09 01465 g008c
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g009a 550Nanomaterials 09 01465 g009b 550Nanomaterials 09 01465 g009c 550Nanomaterials 09 01465 g009d 550
Figure 9. (a,e,i,m,q) Bright field TEM images, (b,f,j,n,r) particle size distributions, (c,g,k,o,s) Selected area electron diffraction patterns, and (d,h,l,p,t) High resolution TEM images corresponding to Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders for: x = 0 (a–d), 0.05 (e–h), 0.10 (i–l), 0.15 (m–p) and 0.20 (q–t), respectively.
Figure 9. (a,e,i,m,q) Bright field TEM images, (b,f,j,n,r) particle size distributions, (c,g,k,o,s) Selected area electron diffraction patterns, and (d,h,l,p,t) High resolution TEM images corresponding to Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders for: x = 0 (a–d), 0.05 (e–h), 0.10 (i–l), 0.15 (m–p) and 0.20 (q–t), respectively.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g009aNanomaterials 09 01465 g009bNanomaterials 09 01465 g009cNanomaterials 09 01465 g009d
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g010 550
Figure 10. Comparison between average crystallite size determined from XRD data and average particle size measured from SEM and TEM images.
Figure 10. Comparison between average crystallite size determined from XRD data and average particle size measured from SEM and TEM images.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g010
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g011 550
Figure 11. M-H hysteresis loops for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders: Inset showing the low-field M = f(H) dependence.
Figure 11. M-H hysteresis loops for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders: Inset showing the low-field M = f(H) dependence.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g011
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g012 550
Figure 12. Fluorescence spectra for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders.
Figure 12. Fluorescence spectra for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders.
Nanomaterials 09 01465 g012
Table
Table 1. Amounts of precursors for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 sol-gel synthesis.
Table 1. Amounts of precursors for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 sol-gel synthesis.
x = 0x = 0.05x = 0.10x = 0.15x = 0.20
Bi(NO3)3·5H2O1.4554 g1.3826 g1.3098 g1.2371 g1.1643 g
Eu(NO3)3·5H2O0 g0.0643 g0.1285 g0.1928 g0.2571 g
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O1.2121 g1.2121 g1.2121 g1.2121 g1.2121 g
2-methoxyetanol125 mL125 mL125 mL125 mL125 mL
Acetic acid125 mL125 mL125 mL125 mL125 mL
Table
Table 2. TG-DSC effects corresponding to Bi1−xEuxFeO3 xerogels.
Table 2. TG-DSC effects corresponding to Bi1−xEuxFeO3 xerogels.
x = 0x = 0.05x = 0.10x = 0.15x = 0.20
T (°C)Mass Loss (%)T (°C)Mass Loss (%)T (°C)Mass Loss (%)T (°C)Mass Loss (%)T (°C)Mass Loss (%)
103.3−4103−4.4105.1−3.7108.3−4.7104.5−4.7
214.1−18.2218.4−26.5221.6−24.6206.7−12.4208.7−13.4
275.9−14278.0−5.5282.1−8.7239.2−11.4240.3−11.1
413.5−2.4419.9−2422.2−2.1269.9−10.8277.9−10.8
427.8−2.2391.9−2.7
Table
Table 3. Agreement indices from Rietveld refinement for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Table 3. Agreement indices from Rietveld refinement for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 calcined powders.
Agreement Indicesx = 0x = 0.05x = 0.10x = 0.15x = 0.20
Rexp6.13816.44796.44516.35966.4065
Rp5.53045.02386.73918.61368.7802
Rwp7.16366.49518.980211.654011.6193
χ21.36211.01471.94143.35813.2894
Table
Table 4. Mössbauer parameters for x = 0 and x = 0.20 samples.
Table 4. Mössbauer parameters for x = 0 and x = 0.20 samples.
IS (mm/s)ΔEq (mm/s)Hhf (T)
x = 00.3350.17948.90
x = 0.200.335−0.05448.89
SE±0.001±0.002±0.02
Table
Table 5. Ms, Mr and Hc for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders.
Table 5. Ms, Mr and Hc for Bi1−xEuxFeO3 powders.
x = 0x = 0.05x = 0.10x = 0.15x = 0.20
Ms (emu/g)0.35291.65701.10890.71130.2968
Mr (emu/g)0.01280.22870.07340.05510.0457
Hc (Oe)51.290101.16069.88391.15636.815

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Surdu, V.-A.; Trușcă, R.D.; Vasile, B.Ș.; Oprea, O.C.; Tanasă, E.; Diamandescu, L.; Andronescu, E.; Ianculescu, A.C. Bi1−xEuxFeO3 Powders: Synthesis, Characterization, Magnetic and Photoluminescence Properties. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101465

AMA Style

Surdu V-A, Trușcă RD, Vasile BȘ, Oprea OC, Tanasă E, Diamandescu L, Andronescu E, Ianculescu AC. Bi1−xEuxFeO3 Powders: Synthesis, Characterization, Magnetic and Photoluminescence Properties. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(10):1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Surdu, Vasile-Adrian, Roxana Doina Trușcă, Bogdan Ștefan Vasile, Ovidiu Cristian Oprea, Eugenia Tanasă, Lucian Diamandescu, Ecaterina Andronescu, and Adelina Carmen Ianculescu. 2019. "Bi1−xEuxFeO3 Powders: Synthesis, Characterization, Magnetic and Photoluminescence Properties" Nanomaterials 9, no. 10: 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101465

APA Style

Surdu, V.-A., Trușcă, R. D., Vasile, B. Ș., Oprea, O. C., Tanasă, E., Diamandescu, L., Andronescu, E., & Ianculescu, A. C. (2019). Bi1−xEuxFeO3 Powders: Synthesis, Characterization, Magnetic and Photoluminescence Properties. Nanomaterials, 9(10), 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop