Next Article in Journal
Local Melting of Gold Thin Films by Femtosecond Laser-Interference Processing to Generate Nanoparticles on a Source Target
Previous Article in Journal
Flower-like Cu2SnS3 Nanostructure Materials with High Crystallinity for Sodium Storage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 8
Issue 7
10.3390/nano8070476
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Nanoparticle Morphology on Pre-Breakdown and Breakdown Properties of Insulating Oil-Based Nanofluids

by
Yuzhen Lv
1,2,
Yang Ge
1,*,
Zhen Sun
2,
Qian Sun
2,
Meng Huang
1,
Chengrong Li
1,
Bo Qi
1,
Jinsha Yuan
3 and
Zhaoliang Xing
4
1
State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
2
School of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
3
School of Electrical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Global Energy Interconnection Research Institute Co. Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2018, 8(7), 476; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8070476
Submission received: 7 June 2018 / Revised: 21 June 2018 / Accepted: 25 June 2018 / Published: 28 June 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nanoparticles currently in use are challenged in further improving the dielectric strength of insulating oil. There is a great need for a new type of nanoparticle to promote the application of insulating oil-based nanofluids in electric industries. This paper experimentally investigates the effect of nanoparticle morphology on pre-breakdown and breakdown properties of insulating oil-based nanofluids. The positive impulse breakdown voltage of insulating oil can be significantly increased by up to 55.5% by the presence of TiO2 nanorods, up to 1.23 times that of TiO2 nanospheres. Pre-breakdown streamer propagation characteristics reveal that streamer discharge channels turn into a bush-like shape with much denser and shorter branches in the nanofluid with TiO2 nanorods. Moreover, the propagation velocity of streamers is dramatically decreased to 34.7% of that in the insulating oil. The greater improvement of nanorods on the breakdown property can be attributed to the lower distortion of the electric field. Thus, when compared with nanospheres, pre-breakdown streamer propagation of nanofluid is much more suppressed with the addition of nanorods, resulting in a greater breakdown voltage.

1. Introduction

Nanoparticles have shown a promising prospect in improving the electric performance of dielectric materials [1,2]. The insulating oil-based nanofluids exhibit great potential to address the strong demands for power equipment with large capacity, high dielectric strength and small volume in an ultra-high voltage power grid [3,4]. The dielectric strength of insulating oils is closely related to the breakdown event, which is caused by the initiation and propagation of charged gaseous channels called “streamers” at the pre-breakdown stage [5]. Previous experimental evidence for insulating oils has shown that positive streamers emanating from the positive electrode tend to initiate at lower applied voltages and propagate faster and further than negative ones. As a result, impulse pre-breakdown streamers and breakdown under positive polarity constitute a great risk to dielectric strength in power equipment [6,7].
Extensive research has been conducted into dispersing nanoparticles into the oil to improve the dielectric strength of the insulating oil [8,9,10,11]. The lightning impulse breakdown voltage of insulating oil can be improved by 82.6% with the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles [8]. However, this conductive nanoparticle may increase the electrical conductivity of the insulating liquid and be influenced by a magnetic field which restricts its practical application [12]. In this case, insulating and semi-conductive nanoparticles (e.g., Al2O3 and TiO2) with lower electrical conductivity are widely used to improve the dielectric strength of the insulating oil. However, the improvement of positive impulse breakdown voltage by these nanoparticles is generally around 30% under optimum concentrations [13,14,15,16,17]. There is still a bottleneck in further increasing the dielectric strength of nanofluids modified by semiconducting nanoparticles. To date, only spherical nanoparticles have been used to modify the dielectric strength of insulating oil. Therefore, there is a necessity to investigate the effect of the microscopic structure of nanoparticles on the dielectric strength of insulating oil. The nanoparticle morphology may shed light on the enhancement of the dielectric strength of insulating oil-based nanofluid.
In this work, the effect of the TiO2 nanoparticle morphology on the dielectric strength of insulating oil-based nanofluids is investigated. TiO2 nanospheres and nanorods with a similar diameter were prepared by the solvothermal method and used to synthesize insulating oil-based nanofluids. The dielectric strengths of insulating oil and nanofluids with the same nanoparticle concentration were measured. To reveal the breakdown process, the propagation characteristics of pre-breakdown streamers were studied with the help of the schlieren technique. Moreover, the effect mechanism of nanoparticle morphology on the improvement of dielectric strength of insulating oil is proposed.

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials

TiO2 nanospheres and nanorods modified by oleic acid were synthesized by the solvothermal method in our lab [18]. Naphthenic transformer oil (25# Karamay) was used as the insulating oil, which was filtered to remove impurities and meet the demand for clean oil defined by CIGRE (International Council on Large Electric Systems) working group 12.17 [19].

2.2. Preparation of Insulating Oil-Based Nanofluids

TiO2 nanofluids (NFs) were prepared by dispersing TiO2 nanoparticles into the insulating oil with a concentration of 0.075 vol. % under stirring and ultrasonic treatment. The insulating oil and nanofluids were degassed at less than 1 kPa for 24 h before testing, and the moisture content of each sample was around 10 ppm.

2.3. Characterization and Measurement

The morphology of nanoparticle powders was observed by transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). However, limited by the vacuum environment of TEM, the morphology of nanoparticles in nanofluids cannot be observed directly. So, the liquid cell was applied to characterize the morphology of nanoparticles in nanofluids, as shown in Figure 1 [20,21]. The liquid cell was made from two vacuum-tight electron transparent membranes with a controlled separation of about 100 nm to 1 μm. Thin SiN films were used as membranes. The cell was filled with the oil. The electron beam was passed through the membranes and oil to allow recording of images [21].
The breakdown and pre-breakdown properties were investigated by the experimental setup using schlieren technique, as shown in Figure 2 [22]. The breakdown property was measured according to the standard procedures for testing lightning impulse breakdown voltages (IEC60897-1987). A needle-sphere electrode system, with a high voltage tungsten needle (tip radius of 35 ± 5 μm) opposing a grounded sphere, was located within a test cell made of transparent Perspex sheet, which facilitates the streamer observation. An Intensified Charge Coupled Device (ICCD) camera was used to capture streamer propagation images, which were performed with an electrode gap of 40 mm under peak voltage of 75 kV. The camera works with the help of the laser to meet the need of the schlieren technique. A trigger unit was used to synchronously trigger the impulse generator and camera.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Nanoparticle Morphology

As shown in Figure 3, the as-prepared nanorods have a small diameter of 4.6 ± 0.3 nm and a length of 22.0 ± 1.1 nm with a uniform particle size distribution. The nanospheres have a diameter of 4.3 ± 0.1 nm. After added to oils, nanospheres disperse uniformly, as shown in Figure 4a. Whereas, nanorods tend to contact each other, as shown in Figure 4b. Moreover, the size of the nanoparticles is observed to be increased. The nanorods have an average diameter of 6.8 nm and a length of 27.6 nm. And nanospheres with an average diameter of 7.6 nm are obtained. The reason for the increased particle size is that the exterior of the TiO2 nanoparticles as modified by oleic acid is a hydrophobic alkyl long chain with oil molecules coated on the surface of the TiO2 nanoparticles [23].

3.2. Breakdown Property

The positive breakdown properties of insulating oil and two types of TiO2 nanofluids are shown in Table 1. The breakdown voltages of TiO2 nanofluids are both higher than that of the insulating oil. The nanorods have the best performance in the improvement of the breakdown strength of the insulating oil. In the case of the addition of TiO2 nanorods, the breakdown voltage is increased by up to 55.5%. The improvement is more than twice that of nanospheres, which is only 25.9%. Of particular note, the time to breakdown is significantly increased by 83.2% with the presence of nanorods. According to the data on time to breakdown, it can be clearly seen that nanorods dramatically change the average propagation velocity of positive streamers, which is of great importance since it has a significant influence on the breakdown voltage of insulating liquid [24,25].

3.3. Pre-breakdown Streamer Propagation

Figure 5 shows the shapes of pre-breakdown streamers from initiation to their maximum lengths (at 12 μs for insulating oil and 15 μs for nanofluids) in insulating oil and two types of nanofluids with nanospheres and nanorods, respectively. The streamers in insulating oil and nanofluids extend to the ground electrode once derived from the needle electrode. In insulating oil, pre-breakdown streamers show a tree-like shape, the same as those reported in References [26,27]. With the increase of propagation time, only two or three filaments are left to develop into main channels, the distance between which is obviously elongated. When compared with the streamer shapes in the insulating oil, streamers in nanofluids show a bush-like shape and have three considerable differences, especially for nanofluid with nanorods. First, more lateral branches are formed in nanofluid with nanorods than the fluid with nanospheres during the propagation process. Second, branches are much denser, and the distance between main channels is much closer in nanofluid with nanorods than that with nanospheres. Third, it is worth noting that streamer propagation length is kept even shorter in nanofluid with nanorods during the propagation process as presented in Figure 6. In addition, the average propagation velocity of streamers in insulating oil is 2.22 km/s according to the slope of curves in Figure 6, which is consistent with propagation velocity of second streamers in mineral insulating oil [6]. Whereas, in nanofluid with nanorods, the velocity is sharply decreased to 0.77 km/s, even lower than that of 1.04 km/s in nanofluid with nanospheres. This observation indicates that the addition of nanoparticles in a rod-like shape has a more significantly inhibiting effect on streamer propagation process than sphere-like ones.

3.4. Discussion

In dielectric liquids, the breakdown strength is related to the streamer propagation, which is strongly affected by the electric field [3,5,6]. The electrons and positive ions are generated at streamer tips by ionization. When compared with positive ions, electrons move out of the ionization region with a much faster speed, leaving positive ions to become the transient space charges, as presented in Figure 7. In insulating oil, positive ions tend to assemble locally due to the filament shape of streamers, resulting in a greater distortion of the electric field. Thus, the electric field towards the ground electrode is enhanced by the space–charge field created by the positive ions, making it easier for streamers to propagate.
The greater inhibition on the propagation process of pre-breakdown streamers as well as the improvement on breakdown properties contribute to the difference of nanoparticle morphology. Nanoparticles are considered to have a large area of interface in nanocomposites [28,29], so streamers easily contact nanoparticles [30,31]. Whereas, streamers cannot go through the nanoparticles but must go around them, leading to more branches. This is similar to the treeing propagation in polymer nanocomposites proved by the scanning electron micrograph [32,33]. When compared with nanospheres, the streamers are more likely to be blocked by nanorods due to their larger collision cross-section, resulting in more branches.
Furthermore, the large interfacial layer surrounding nanoparticles is beneficial for charge migration [30,31]. The interaction zone for charge migration is formed when interfacial layers overlap [31,32]. There is a higher probability for nanorods to come in contact with each other (as shown in Figure 4b), forming an extended interaction zone in which charges can move easily. This has also been reported in nanocomposites modified by TiO2 nanorods [34,35]. The promotion of charge migration in the nanofluid with nanorods is verified by the conductivity test according to the standard of IEC 60247-2004 as presented in Table 2. It should be mentioned that all observed results are mainly related to morphology, and do not consider the change of electron transport properties in the particles. Nanofluid with nanorods has a greater conductivity which means that charges migrate more easily. Some electrons may move in different directions through the interaction zone, further increasing the branches of streamers. In this case, streamer tips of nanofluids with nanorods distribute along an arc, as illustrated in Figure 8. So, the space charges generated at the streamer tips distribute more uniformly compared with that in the insulating oil or nanofluid with nanospheres, as presented in Figure 9. The distortion of the electric field is decreased, which considerably reduces the streamer propagation length. Therefore, the propagation of pre-breakdown streamers in nanofluid is greatly hindered by the presence of nanorods, resulting in the significant improvement in breakdown property.

4. Conclusions

This paper investigated the effect of nanoparticle morphology on pre-breakdown and breakdown properties of insulating oil-based nanofluids, revealing the working mechanism for greater improvement by nanorods. The improvement of the breakdown property of nanofluid with nanorods is much larger than that of TiO2 nanospheres. Moreover, in nanofluid with TiO2 nanorods, pre-breakdown streamers exhibit a bush-like shape with the most branches and shortest propagation length compared with insulating oil and nanofluid with nanospheres. Thus, the addition of nanorods significantly suppresses the pre-breakdown streamer propagation, leading to a remarkable improvement in the breakdown property. Consequently, it is anticipated that TiO2 nanorods will provide a promising material for improving the dielectric strength of insulating oil and be highly desirable for future application in power equipment.

Author Contributions

Y.L. and Y.G. conceived, designed the experiments and wrote the paper; Z.S. and Q.S. prepared and the materials; Y.G., M.H. and Z.X. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; C.L., B.Q., and J.Y. gave some good advice during the experiments and discussion.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China for supporting this research under Contract No. 51337003, 51472084 and State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology (GEIRI-SKL-2017-009).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, N.; Dibenedetto, S.A.; Tewari, P.; Lanagan, M.T.; Ratner, M.A.; Marks, T.J. Nanoparticle, size, shape, and interfacial effects on leakage current density, permittivity, and breakdown strength of metal oxide−polyolefin nanocomposites: Experiment and theory. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 1567–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paszkiewicz, S.; Szymczyk, A.; Pawlikowska, D.; Subocz, J.; Zenker, M.; Masztak, R. Electrically and thermally conductive low density polyethylene-based nanocomposites reinforced by MWCNT or Hybrid MWCNT/Graphene nanoplatelets with improved thermo-oxidative stability. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dung, N.V.; Hoidalen, H.K.; Linhjell, D.; Lundgaard, L.E.; Unge, M. Influence of impurities and additives on negative streamers in paraffinic model oil. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 20, 876–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lesaint, O.; Jung, M. On the relationship between streamer branching and propagation in liquids: Influence of pyrene in cyclohexane. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2000, 33, 1360–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Unge, M.; Singha, S.; Dung, N.V.; Linhjell, D.; Ingebrigtsen, S.; Lundgaard, L.E. Enhancements in the lightning impulse breakdown characteristics of natural ester dielectric liquids. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 172905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Massala, G.; Lesaint, O. A comparison of negative and positive streamers in mineral oil at large gaps. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2001, 34, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Furusato, T.; Tanoue, H.; Katsuki, S.; Hara, M.; Akiyama, H. Prebreakdown process of a negative nanosecond pulsed discharge in supercritical carbon dioxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 7, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Segal, V.; Hjortsberg, A.; Rabinovich, A.; Nattrass, D.; Raj, K. AC (60 Hz) and impulse breakdown strength of a colloidal fluid based on transformer oil and magnetite nanoparticles. IEEE Int. Sympos. Electr. Insul. 1998, 2, 619–622. [Google Scholar]
  9. Du, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, M.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Tu, Y. Effect of electron shallow trap on breakdown performance of transformer oil-based nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 104104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sartoratto, P.; Neto, A.; Lima, E.; Rodrigues, S.A.; Morais, P.C. Preparation and electrical properties of oil-based magnetic fluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 10Q917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mimura, K.; Kato, K. Enhanced dielectric properties of BaTiO3 nanocube assembled film in metal-insulator-metal capacitor structure. Appl. Phys. Express 2014, 7, 61501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, Q.; Yu, F.; Sima, W.; Yuan, T.; Jin, Y.; Song, H. Inhibition effect of space charge transportation on impulse breakdown performance of propylene carbonate with Al2O3 nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 513–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Du, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, M.; Zhong, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y. Effect of semiconductive nanoparticles on insulating performances of transformer oil. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 770–776. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sima, W.X.; Cao, X.F.; Yang, Q.; Song, H.; Shi, J. Preparation of three transformer oil-based nanofluids and comparison of their impulse breakdown characteristics. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2014, 6, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, R.; Pettersson, L.A.A.; Auletta, T.; Hjortstam, O. Fundamental research on the application of nano dielectrics to transformers. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, Cancun, Mexico, 16–19 October 2011; pp. 423–427. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yao, W.; Huang, Z.; Li, J.; Wu, L.; Xiang, C. Enhanced electrical insulation and heat transfer performance of vegetable oil based nanofluids. J. Nanomater. 2018, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Taylor, R.; Coulombe, S.; Otanicar, T.; Phelan, P. Small particles, big impacts: A review of the diverse applications of nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 011301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gonzalo-Juan, I.; McBride, R.J.; Dickerson, H.J. Ligand-mediated shape control in the solvothermal synthesis of titanium dioxide nanospheres, nanorods and nanowires. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3799–3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Council on Large Electric Systems (CIGRE). Effect of Particles on Transformer Dielectric Strength; Working Group 17 of Study Committee; Council on Large Electric Systems: Paris, France, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  20. De, J.N.; Ross, F.M. Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 695–704. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ross, F.M. Opportunities and challenges in liquid cell electron microscopy. Science 2015, 350, aaa9886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lv, Y.; Ge, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Zou, Y.; Qi, B.; Yi, K.; Chen, X.; Yuan, J. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on streamer propagation in transformer oil under lightning impulse voltage. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 2110–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, E.Y.; Choi, H.; Whang, C.M. Controlled growth of TiO2 nanorods capped with carboxylate groups by the solvothermal process. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 3895–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jadidian, J.; Zahn, M.; Lavesson, N.; Widlund, O.; Borg, K. Impulse breakdown delay in liquid dielectrics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 192910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Dung, N.V.; Høidalen, H.K.; Linhjell, D.; Lundgaard, L.E.; Unge, M. Effects of reduced pressure and additives on streamers in white oil in long point-plane gap. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2013, 46, 255501–255516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beroual, A.; Zahn, M.; Badent, A.; Kist, K.; Schwabe, A.J.; Yamashita, H.; Yamazawa, K.; Danikas, M.; Chadband, W.G.; Torshin, Y. Propagation and structure of streamers in liquid dielectrics. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. Mag. 1998, 14, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dung, N.V.; Hoidalen, H.K.; Linhjell, D.; Lundgaard, L.E.; Unge, M. Influence of impurities and additives on positive streamers in paraffinic model oil. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 1593–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, M.; Huang, J.; Wang, H.; Wu, G.; Wu, H. Alignment of boron nitride nanofibers in epoxy composite films for thermal conductivity and dielectric breakdown strength improvement. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Xiao, K. Effect of nanoparticles on the morphology, thermal, and electrical properties of low-density polyethylene after thermal aging. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lewis, T.J. Interfaces: Nanometric dielectrics. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanaka, T. Dielectric nanocomposites with insulating properties. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2005, 12, 914–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nelson, J.K. Dielectric Polymer Nanocomposites, 7th ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 198–226. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tanaka, T.; Matsunawa, A.; Ohki, Y.; Kozako, M.; Kohtoh, M.; Okabe, S. Treeing Phenomena in Epoxy/Alumina Nanocomposite and Interpretation by a Multi-core Model. IEEJ Trans. Fund. Mater. 2007, 126, 1128–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zerjav, G.; Arshad, M.S.; Djinovic, P.; Junkar, I.; Kovac, J.; Zavasnik, J.; Pintar, A. Improved electron-hole separation and migration in anatase TiO2 nanorod/reduced graphene oxide composites and their influence on photocatalytic performance. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 4578–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nam, S.H.; Ju, D.W.; Boo, J.H. Comparison of photovoltaic properties of TiO2 electrodes prepared with nanoparticles and nanorods. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 9406–9410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of a liquid cell and (b) configuration for electron microscopy in oil.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of a liquid cell and (b) configuration for electron microscopy in oil.
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g001
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic of experimental setup for breakdown and pre-breakdown measurement.
Figure 2. Schematic of experimental setup for breakdown and pre-breakdown measurement.
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g002
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g003 550
Figure 3. HRTEM (High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscope) images for TiO2 nanospheres and nanorods.
Figure 3. HRTEM (High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscope) images for TiO2 nanospheres and nanorods.
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g003
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g004 550
Figure 4. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images for (a) TiO2 nanospheres and (b) nanorods in nanofluids.
Figure 4. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images for (a) TiO2 nanospheres and (b) nanorods in nanofluids.
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g004
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g005 550
Figure 5. Pre-breakdown streamer propagation images for insulating oil, nanofluid with nanospheres and nanorods.
Figure 5. Pre-breakdown streamer propagation images for insulating oil, nanofluid with nanospheres and nanorods.
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g005
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g006 550
Figure 6. Positive streamer propagation length in insulating oil and nanofluids versus propagation times.
Figure 6. Positive streamer propagation length in insulating oil and nanofluids versus propagation times.
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g006
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g007 550
Figure 7. The electric field distribution in insulating oil ( E 0 : applied electric field, E q : space–charge electric field).
Figure 7. The electric field distribution in insulating oil ( E 0 : applied electric field, E q : space–charge electric field).
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g007
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g008 550
Figure 8. Streamers of nanofluid with nanorods.
Figure 8. Streamers of nanofluid with nanorods.
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g008
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g009 550
Figure 9. The electric field distribution in the nanofluid ( E 0 : applied electric field; E q : space-charge electric field).
Figure 9. The electric field distribution in the nanofluid ( E 0 : applied electric field; E q : space-charge electric field).
Nanomaterials 08 00476 g009
Table
Table 1. Positive breakdown properties of insulating oil and TiO2 nanofluids.
Table 1. Positive breakdown properties of insulating oil and TiO2 nanofluids.
SampleBreakdown Voltage (kV)Standard Deviation (kV)Time to Breakdown (μs)Standard Deviation (μs)
Insulating oil83.525.8915.091.08
Nanofluid (Nanosphere)105.195.7622.381.98
Nanofluid (Nanorod)129.852.5427.651.27
Table
Table 2. Conductivity of insulating oil and TiO2 nanofluids.
Table 2. Conductivity of insulating oil and TiO2 nanofluids.
SampleInsulating OilNanofluid (Nanosphere)Nanofluid (Nanorod)
Conductivity (S/m) 6.4 × 10 − 13 2.8 × 10 − 11 4.5 × 10 − 11

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, Y.; Ge, Y.; Sun, Z.; Sun, Q.; Huang, M.; Li, C.; Qi, B.; Yuan, J.; Xing, Z. Effect of Nanoparticle Morphology on Pre-Breakdown and Breakdown Properties of Insulating Oil-Based Nanofluids. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8070476

AMA Style

Lv Y, Ge Y, Sun Z, Sun Q, Huang M, Li C, Qi B, Yuan J, Xing Z. Effect of Nanoparticle Morphology on Pre-Breakdown and Breakdown Properties of Insulating Oil-Based Nanofluids. Nanomaterials. 2018; 8(7):476. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8070476

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Yuzhen, Yang Ge, Zhen Sun, Qian Sun, Meng Huang, Chengrong Li, Bo Qi, Jinsha Yuan, and Zhaoliang Xing. 2018. "Effect of Nanoparticle Morphology on Pre-Breakdown and Breakdown Properties of Insulating Oil-Based Nanofluids" Nanomaterials 8, no. 7: 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8070476

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop